I've recently become fascinated with aviation and fighter jets but this is the best video I've seen yet. Better than any f22 f35 14 15 16 video I've seen. Truly amazing
@@jiro3428 Well... everyone knew Putin was a dictator, so why did everyone refuse to negotiate for 8 years? Because the West wanted the war, and they all admit it. Everyone is at fault. I respect both Russians and Ukrainians so much more than I do the West. I hate all the needless death, but people in Washington couldn't be happier.
@@jotunblod No, this didn't age well. Phobe implies fear. After watching the clown show that is the failed assault on Ukraine and their submarine literally falling apart as it left Cuba, there is no fear of Russia. I have nothing but apathy for Russia and those that would defend them.
I'm an American veteran, and I can recognize that the Su-27/35 are some of the most capable and stunningly beautiful aircraft ever produced. Su-35 shows that you can have grace AND power.
I totally agree and respect you for accepting this. Whilst certain American aircraft are also capable of similar manoeuvres, they lack the grace with which the Su-35 performs them
Aeronautically, USA has nothing even close.... but aeronautics don't win in the air anymore... its all about electronics and stealth and weapons carrying range/capacity... which is sad for people who love aeronautical performance... all they want today is stealth "trucks" with good radar and electronics jammers...
@@geoffreyleonard99 define your terms please re “engagement range” I’m guessing it’s about early detection and missile strike capabilities? Then I’m going to suggest that the “stealthy” are not so stealthy and that the range of air to air missiles would be the determining factor. A red versus blue was gamed and the conclusion was that “it was like clubbing baby seals”. Blue team were the baby seals and the JSF-35 “can’t turn, can’t climb, and can’t run” due to single engine and low power/weight ratio. No super cruise and no missile launch at supersonic. Russian radars pick them up early in Syria. JSF-35 has definite avionics issues as any quick search can verify. My country bought a dud to bail out LM? Airpower Australia did a full independent analysis and the results were damning. The F-22 would be the pick of the US aircraft and I don’t have much on the Su 57 except that it flies extremely well from my observations and would no doubt have long range air to air strike capability.
@ Your blind bias (and level of knowledge) is not very obvious, then.... As usual many Americans live with a false confidence believing they are the best at everything. It should be, as the US Government spends more on defense than every other country in the world combined. Yet reality is a bitter pill. Sit back and stuff another burger down your neck and vote for obesity and heart disease, as THAT is what the USA is truly best at.
5 лет назад
@@Slaktrax ,..No "False confidence" ( as you call it ) here partner! You damn skippy I am down with the Red, White, and the mother #ucking Blue! As if you don't have pride in your country, whatever it is. You picked the wrong one to try and spin ya bull chit on,..try somewhere else..
D Joe The AIM missile is best known to have least accuracy. Any Su 30 Can easily deflect it. And one more thing that dancing is best at gaining air superiority during dogfight.
Сталин французам подарил Як-3,лучший самолет второй мирорвой войны,Месершмита драл хорошо,Покрышкин показазал 63 победа,а не официально еще больше,групповые бои не считались и часто свои победы отдавали тем их сзади прикрывал,а я считаю заслуженно...
@@Lil_Thick This is called flat spin not "falling" that used in a dogfight and of course this is a trained pilot he knows what he's doing and can recover from it.
@@tinfoilchampion3651 No. According to Russian engineers: “While the canard layout brought advantages in terms of improved maneuverability, it also added structural weight to the airframe. A conventional airframe coupled with thrust vector control, the source said, could now provide the same capability.” Basically improvements to thrust-vectoring have achieved what canards were doing in the past and this has been reflected in the design of the Su-35 and Su-57 which instead of canards utilize leading-edge vortex controllers (LEVCONs). The Su-37 never entered production. The top Russian air-superiority supermanouverable fighter (if we exclude the Su-57 for now) is the Su-35. The aircraft with the closest resemblance with canards is the Su-30MKI which is a joint Russian-Indian product. Indian pilots on Su-30MKI have routinely been doing wargames against US pilots mainly of F-15E and have achieved victory in many of the dogfighting scenarios. The first such join exercise was 20 years ago back in 2004 during 'Cope India 04' where Indian Su-30MK (not the advanced MKI version) achieved impressive 9:1 kill ratio against U.S. F-15s. It was a wake-up call to the US.
Incredible !!!! In the beginning, the short and quick vertical take off, at minute 5:57 trapeze stunt, overall just mesmerizing!!! The pilot and plane has to be either from Russia, Rusia, RRusia, Russsia, Rrrussia, or out of this world.- It cannot be from another place other than Russia !! Fantastic fighter plane ! Fenómenal pilot- Sergey Bogdan !! Braaavooo !!!!
@@GegeDxD Go to the very beginning. It flows up 30-50 meters or so, then nose up 90 degrees into a vertical climb. It's insane, a lot of birds can't do it.
Why are there so many patriots in the comment section, who feel the need to talk bad about other countries? We are all humans. The only difference is the language we speak and the environment we live in. There are bad guys and good guys in every nation.
megaapfel That doesn't matter. We born in different enviroment, with different cultural education, with different values. And every citizen of my motherland will fight for their values, culture and family.
Александр Мельничников It does matter. Earth is a planet as you surely know. If someone makes a mistake, everyone else pays the price. Your values are not different, this is the same one everywhere. Why do I find the same nationalist in my own country? Try to answer me.
Pilou Pilou First two sentences are obvious, i have nothing against. About next statements: I don't agree. If our values were the same with everyone 70 years ago - Russia wouldn't exists, people would be slaves working for REAL nationalists. In russia most people are patriots, not nationalists. This is a different thing, we are not against other nations, we are very friendly with em and russia is a multinational county. But if someone plays bad with us - we do the same. And, you can find the same nationalists in your country because there are no bad nations, there are bad people in the world, but difference in - we don't support nationalists, they are criminals and offcource you think that patriots in russia are nationalist but that's wrong. I tried, your turn to understand, but i don't think you'll be able to understand cause different education, values, traditions, but every russian will understand me well.
Yep, if the United States has an aircraft that can match that maneuverability, I have yet to see it. Plus, that plane is just sexy as hell. Hats off to the operator, peerless skillset.
It's been 5 years now... It was the last russian plane I saw in an European Airshow...Fucking sad. I don't care about politics, I just want to see these masterpiece of engineering flying and salute their pilot after the show :'(
@@williamboyer1165 Modern fighter, powerful long-range radar, new missile modifications, high range, better maneuverability. Russian fighters do not need stealth, with them a lot of anti-aircraft systems. F-35 is not a panacea, low speed, medium visibility, medium range, full load removes all stealth. Over-the-horizon radars see them from afar, against a strong anti-aircraft system they will loss. PS Sorry for the English, use Google translate)
@@williamboyer1165 Hahahaha. Is that why even American experts say that the F-35 couldn't beat the Su-35 in a dog fight in a million years. And that's why the F-35 (which can detect the Su-35 earlier) will probably avoid the Su-35.
You do realize dogfights aren't how they look in the movies, right? Tight turns only matter if you get in close enough. And maneuvers that sharp bleed off huge amounts of energy. Even F-22 pilots know better than to stick around too long in the slow-speed zone where thrust vectoring provides most of the directional control. Because that kind of sharp, slow-speed turning may let you get in a shot, but you'd better pray you get it first try, because if not, you're a sitting duck... Now, whether or not the F-35 will or will not be a pig remains to be seen. But jets shouldn't be compared based solely on their top speeds and G-limiters. There's so much more going on. The reason everyone does so is because it's nice to have two numbers to point to and say "A is bigger than B! A wins!" Few things in life are this simple.
You talk at the level of an amateur, I'm sorry. The plane that you see is a multipurpose. All these pirouettes allow for minimal time to work more ground targets, the aircraft than any American would be more efficient and not as fast in the destruction of ground targets. It is not necessary to imagine yourself what it is for air combat. Do not think in terms of the 20th century.
Airshows never tell the real story. It maybe an impressive performance, but Sukhois in airshows carried very little fuel, and no weapons. Fully loaded, the poor Su-35 Thrust-to-weight ratio is only 0,94 -- even worse than F-16; its wing-loading is a whooping 500,8 kg/m2 -- worse than F-18F. And never talk about reliability and spare part issues for these Russian-made Sukhois!
My all-time favorite jet video. I lost track long ago of how many times I've watched this video and shown it to other people. My girlfriend rolls her eyes when I show it to someone new, but I look over and she's watching it too for the hundredth time.
@@interpretolog самлёт ОК, потому что его не русня, а ссср создавал (то есть - и Украина, Литва, Эстония, Латвия…). А вы только танк из говна способны слепить :D
The energy retention and performance of the Su-35 is insane, looking at the nozzles he barely ever needed to go full afterburner to regain/retain energy. Absolutely insane engineering. Not to mention the unbelievable amount of skill, knowledge of and trust in his machine the pilot has. Plus being able to fly like that under the pressure of all those sustained g's? Wow.
You have to take into account that its empty nothing weighing it down. I would love to see it do that with full load out. Its still nice to see it fly around.
@@marjanpavlovic211 obv we have to take that "into account", no aircraft in the world can even do what the su35 does with the same energies and also have a full loadout.
@@marjanpavlovic211 full load out what for? usually the weapons are chosen based on the flight purpose. no sense to load everything. 2-4 missiles in 99% of situations.
@TheSataev 2-4 is not usually enough. Usually they will carry at least 2 heat seekers and two radar guided missiles in addition to what they need for whatever mission they are flying. Maybe a small jet like a grippen would have that small of a load out.
Beautiful!! So flat! The amount of g force this pilot is generating is incredible. Making the jet stand on its tail at 5:16 just amazing. That really looks like an art!
Il prend pas beaucoup de G sur ce solo display... Il doit à peine atteindre 7g sur certain virages pour le reste les cobras et autres comme à 5:16 ne sont pas dur à subir pour le corps humain. Si vous voulez des G regardez le Gripen, F16, Rafale avec des pointes à 10.5g pour ce dernier.
This almost makes you teary-eyed when you realize that this is a product of human imagination and engineering. Russian or American is irrelevant here. I think this takes your breath away and makes you feel a little better for mankind, no matter which country you're from or which nationality the engineering team of this plane represents.
@@anfrale4657 true with fcs override switch on the right of the cockpit the pilot can do supermanouverability maneuvers up to 85 angles of attack which is still worse than the russian su 35 which doesn't override but completely disables the fcs (flight control system) which has a risk of ripping off both wings of the aircraft if used in high speed while the hornet still doesn't allow the pilot to break wings by limiting the pilot both aircraft are a piece of art IMO but the war makes them look like machines of the villain while those engineers etc just wanna protect their country by helping them make aircraft the country uses it for bad purposes
It's the art of flying - it's the definition of perfection! I saw it live once and I will never forget it! It's like dancing - like a ballett in the sky. For me as a pilot it's the ultimate you can reach... I just love it!❤️
Un Meteor il est finito... Ne croyez pas qu'un pilote de SU35 fera ce genre de manoeuvre dans un vrai combat face à un Typhoon. Même le Rafale a prouvé qu'il était pas si dangereux quand on a constaté qu'il a brouillé totalement son radar et que le SU35 ne pouvait tout simplement pas tiré de fox 3 sur lui. C'est l'Egypte qui avait fait le test avec un SU35 vs un Rafale.
Мне вот просто было бы любопытно посмотреть что запели бы проамериканские тролли, когда бы в реальном бою сошлись 1 звено СУ 35/37 и пара - тройка звеньев ф22. К сожалению это озаначло бы открытую войну и отключение интернетов (как и просто электричества)). Но уверен, что пока ф22 ловили бы прицелами наши сушки, эти самые сушки уже бы отсрелялись по ним всеми ракетами, на встречных курсах зашли бы в хвост и вырезали бы оставшихся "рапоторов" курсовыми орудиями. И возможно даже без потерь.
Вопрос не только в этом, к сожалению у нас много хороших и современных разработок, но вот в серию многие просто не идут, может подскажите сколько у нас на вооружении этих СУ 35/37 и сколько Ф-22 у янки? К тому же ф -22 надо сравнивать с Т-50 которых у нас 3 шт на испытаниях...
Саша Питерский Про СУ-37 забудьте.Программа прекращена.Тем более это обычны СУ-27M c УВТ, коих у нас навалом. Су-35 вроде было 22 шт. но в заказе до 2015 года должно было стать 48. по крайне мере за февраль нашел публикацию о поставке 12 штук СУ-35 на Дземги. И если базовый су-27 является достаточно надежным и обкатанным самолетом, то бедняга f-22 то и дело попадает под запрет полетов. "Высший пилотаж" в исполнении раптора - жалкое зрелище под которое самое то засыпать. ясно что машина создана не для открытого противостояния в воздухе. Ее основное назначение как у МИГ-21 во время Вьетнама - отстрелялся и убежал
Саша Питерский f22 чуть больше 180, и больше выпускаться не будут, прям как f117 и b2 spirit, которые на деле оказались самыми дорогими кусками металлолома...
+Stefan Djurovic its all about super long range smart air to air missliles anyways dude...no modern fighter jet is ever going to get close to eachother... its not world war 2 ...
+JonnyUnderrated the su35 has jamming capabilities not yet seen by NATO ( because they won't turn them on no matter how much NATO provokes them. they will save that for the big one ) once you're16 if it can avoids all 12 missiles and it goes guns on that's when this baby comes into her own
One of the best wild beasts of sky from Sukhoi and the mighty Russia. Russian pilots are well known for their crazy flying skills of high levels! After Su30, this is another one thrust vector beast! King Cobra of the Sky!
This is the SU-35S, the latest variation with many upgrades including fly-by-wire controls. I just love jet aircraft period and don't care who makes them. We are all human beings and maybe one day well act like one. Far too much hate in the world not to enjoy what others bring to the table.
What an aircraft flown by what a pilot. I believe Russian pilots are encouraged to extract every ounce out of what their aircrafts are capable of. These guys fly like demons.
As an American, I have to admit that the SU-30 and SU-35 are the best in their class. The vector thrust capability that they have are lacking in our fighter aircraft, even the F-35 which is gonna bleed the taxpayer pale!! With the French Rafale for an interceptor, the SU-30 and Rafale combination will be unbeatable. Jackson, Mississippi.
American planes have thrust vectoring. 2-dimesional vectoring in the F-22, 3 dimensional in the F-15, F-16, F-18. US has also developed thrust vectoring for VTOL aircraft like F-35. So I wouldn't say Russians have better thrust vectoring technology. They may have been the first to implement it, but their technology hasn't developed a whole lot beyond basic PID control.
@@vimfuego8827 You made me come back and watch it again 😄 I am still super impressed. 05:14. That manoeuvre is just breathtaking! This is an aeronautical ballet.
I remember being amazed at the agility of the earlier SU-27 in the 1990's, the 'cobra' manoeuvre was unforgettable, so it is good to see the SU-35 is even more impressive!
@@johntechwriter I mean it would be a predominantly 4th gen fighter platform against a full 5th gen program with superior steath, acceleration, and range control. I don't think "demolish in a few hours" is anywhere near possible
The most beautiful figher-jet ever built by human hands.... its like a swan. Looking at this jet fly is so unreal at moments you think this is a fake video or something, but no its real. This is why there are no UFO's in Russian skies lol.
Taking in account SU 35 is a heavy multi-role aircraft (not just fighter), its aerobatic is especially fantastic. Russians have Mig 29 which is 2 times lighter and bit faster and designed as fighter.
What I'm about to tell you would be a fly in a flight engineer's coffee in the USA. Russia was the first country to have jets that could exceed breaking the sound barrier.
@@geraldboykin6159 Um, no. That was done by Chuck Yeager in a Bell X-1 (Both American). Although Russia was the first to use PESA radar, so there's that.
@@sovietpineapple7938 : The Mig 15 is a relic of sound barrier breaking flight. It once outranked the USA's inventory back in the day. But things got better!!
Not only maneuverability. Russian "old overshoe" SU 24 with Л-175В (newest complex for radio-electronic jamming «KHIBINY») blocked all electronics of defense systems (including Aegis combat system) USA destroyer "Donald Cook" - Black Sea, April 2014. One-third of crew immediately filed a letter of resignation;)
VaultBoy87 It would be a big bright target on an America Fighter radar, It would be shot down before it could even detect the US Stealth FIghter,we are not fighting dog fights like they did in WW2 the US has technology for the next war, Russian jets would be awesome indeed for the last war, sitting ducks for the 21st century
It's simply majestic ! The most elegant jet of today..just look at it. He has an appearance of a top athlete: Pure muscle, self confidence and elegance
Marko Nekoizmase Indeed. But I'm British so you should have had a go at our drug-riddled cyclists!!! It was just a "heavy cold" or "asthma" that I took steroids for...honest!
The power to weight ratio is just crazy on that SU-35, fucking beautiful display i love how the pilot just throws the aircraft around the sky, with that much thrust behind him he is not really worried about falling out of the sky. I love the look of the SU-35 and 27 and also the MIG-29 and 35,Russia sure builds some beautiful military aircraft and that's coming from an American, so please don't think that all Americans think Russian planes are crap because i can tell you most American aviation fans love a lot of the Russian aircraft and i am one of them. Usually the people that say Russian aircraft are garbage are trolls that have zero knowledge about aircraft.
They're not crap but they're old doctrine and the new doctrine is all about stealth and emission control and situational awareness. As far as pure flying machines they're spectacular.
America has built some amazing machines over the years but in the past 40 or so years its all been plan by politics and its never once worked. Our front line battle tanks (M1 ABRAMS) are from 1982 and are the single oldest tanks in full use today anywhere and these where CHRYSLER/Lee Iococca products like those K cars). The Russians have adapted to designs that are inexpensive, easy to maintain, and solid flyers. Most of them are simply beautiful machines the SU-35 perhaps the most so. USSR is gone. This is Russia now which is a small republic nation about the size of the Southeast US. They have to budget tightly and yet somehow are doing this and producing these things. If only we here in the US could learn..... Although just yesterday the Pentagon placed an actual order for 8 brand new f-15 eagles that have redesigned air frames, engines, electronics, and avionics packages. Upon successful testing and AIR CERTIFICATION there should be a much larger order coming to the navy. The airforce is working already with a group of redesigned f-16 falcons and an order of those is expected this summer after air certifications this spring. NOT ONE SINGLE yf-22 or f35 HAS EVER OBTAINED AN AIR CERTIFICATION. An f35 was cherry picked for testing to obtain the 8,000 hour mark but last summer it literally fell apart on a runway at around 1500 hours. Even f4 phantoms had that beat by miles. But that was when we were building beautiful machines.
5:25 fifteen years ago a friend told me that he saw UFO. Like 10.000 feet above in the air, not moving like a plane, like no gravity at all. Now i know he maybe not lying.
deyvi69 Friend, even my own country has MIG 21 and 29 since my father was in the army. That is like 30 years ago. You compare 21's and 29's to modern fighters? When was the last time an american fighter fought against SU-35 variants or better? I think only the Grippen is a worthy opponent for this plane.
Nobody has gone against an SU-35 because the Russians only have about a dozen in service. They still rely on their old SU-27 as the bulk of their Air-Air fighter.
Besides, my previous comment was just a rant against all the Russian fan-boys who think that whatever Russia makes is automatically the best thing ever made. That's ridiculous. That is why I shared the history lesson, to prove that history has shown that when Russian equipment goes up against western equipment, they have a tendency to crash and burn. You see, you can't make a wonder fighter and then put a mediocre pilot at the controls and expect them to rule the skys. The West make wonder fighter pilots and puts them in capable machines. This has worked well for us in the past and I expect it will work in the future. If not, we will adapt.
okay All Right I flew 7000+ hrs in high performance jets and I can assure you that this aircraft will beat F22 (or any other US fighter) in a dogfight.
okay All Right I flew 2200 hrs in an F16 (actually) Air Defence and had no problem in a dogfight 1v1 against an F15C but sure as hell would lose against this one.
with this level of maneuverability , it doesn't need to escape detection ... nothing can keep up with it ... it can outmaneuver anything that comes its way !! Superb , elegant, beautiful maginificent . Well done the Russians !
Dogfight.. Enemy pilot: I am hot on the Su35's tail. Enemy pilot: Oh my God..it has just turned on me..and it's flying upside down...facing me..in its reverse direction. This freaking plane is haunted...eject eject eject!!
varun koganti in dog fight, spoting in the sky at low speed like that even if you can make a 360 turn like a copter is definitely a bad idea! Cause your enemy keep his energy by getting altitude come down and shot you while you try to accelerate after your show😁 theses type of maneuvering is only used for air show 😂😝
Oh those big beautiful wings... I'm an american and can see we're in deep do-do...The F-22, F-35 handle like a chevy van compared to that sky Ferrari the russians have built here.
No...Not really. The f22 can fly backwards as well. The Russian jets won't even see the f22 coming to perform these moves. Watch these videos and compare /watch?v=ELo1NRMHuR8 /watch?v=4eiskRcC2ys
martyisabeliever Ya, f35 is a huge waste of money. They are talking about scraping the A-10 warthog do to budget cuts and they could use the F35 instead. Dumbest idea I have ever heard
martyisabeliever Ya that would be cool. They tested that. It's called the NF-16 VISTA. I like the F15 active Idea and now they are coming out with the F-15 "silent eagle"
this is a true masterpiece. it has absolutely perfect shapes. so elegant and beautiful. I would say it has true natural shapes. and it flies like a live being. people who designed it are true geniuses. It really has near resemblance to birds and dolphins in its very shape
svrakata .svrakata It is designed by true patriots to defend people against enemies to come. People who created this jet thought of their families and remembered Nazis invasion that harvested about 20 millions of innocent lives. It's not designed for pirate raids to rob some small distant country to kill women and children USAF planes are mostly used for.
Beautifull machine , great engineering . Very powerful engine . Top pilot . Today, a f35 fly over . Not very high , not very hard . The sound of the engine makes speaking to each other impossible . 10 minutes after he passed , the roaring of the engine was still a disaster . The su 35 has a much better engine .
Sergey Pintelin F-22 is such a boring aircraft. I'm a fan of western aircraft, don't doubt that, but the f-22 is ugly, plain boring, featureless and really can't match the manoeuvrability of the Su-35. In fact any aircraft of similar size and weight can not match it.
+iwantlotsofcows That is mostly due to the fact that it is a stealthy aircraft. The F-22 is as stealthy as the F-117. It wasn't designed to look cool. It was designed to provide next-generation capabilities.
Awesome video. Why can't we all just admire the cool technology/engineering/piloting and drop the childish comments? If you want to turn it into a pissing contest then links us a more entertaining video to watch and we can argue against something real. Who cares about your theoretical b.s. fight that we'd all be better off avoiding in the first place.
Years back at a "church meeting" this guy who probably thought he was a George Patton because he was in the Army Guard told how the Russians were more advanced militarily than the USA. It was just a short time when their house of cards came tumbling down which was good for the people of Eastern Europe. Didn't the Lord say, "my thoughts are not your thoughts and my ways are not your ways?" I bet the Nazi leadership in the thirties and later would never have started WWII had they known the outcome. The saddest thing is the young today in Germany who boast about how the outcome would have been different if etc.
Dobriy Chel You're talking about the R-37? It's a great missile but it's designed to shoot down AWACS planes which are identifiable from 300-400 km away. The chances of detecting and identifying a stealth jet from that range are astronomically low.
georgebaggy no,im talking about РВВ-БД and i remember too well the American stealth bomber was shot down in Yugoslavia by a Soviet missile to believe in the efficacy of US stealth technologys.
Merdeka! Time to show Australia they're not the only ones that can buy fancy aircraft. Now we just need to buy more Su-35s, Leopard 2s, Chang Bogos, Amurs, etc. I'm gonna be honest here, it would be amazing if Indonesia also buys the Buk M1 and the 9K22 Tunguska. Indonesia seriously needs better anti-air weaponry, especially for the Navy.
All that low speed, high angle of attack stuff wins the air show but not a fight. Especially not a war. It's like karate vs MMA. MMA isn't pretty but it just works.
As a Air Show Performer nothing comes close not then the F-22 but US military doesn't make an air show jet. Odds are that the range on a SU-35 isn't comparable to the F22 isn't Stealth so no worries.
@@dannydonald380 True but slow speed flight and high maneuverability is pretty much only good for avoiding missiles or dogfighting in close range when all the missiles are depleted.
