Paris Air Show 2013 - Su-35 vertical take-off + Air Show (HD) 

I totally agree and respect you for accepting this. Whilst certain American aircraft are also capable of similar manoeuvres, they lack the grace with which the Su-35 performs them

Aeronautically, USA has nothing even close.... but aeronautics don't win in the air anymore... its all about electronics and stealth and weapons carrying range/capacity... which is sad for people who love aeronautical performance... all they want today is stealth "trucks" with good radar and electronics jammers...

@@toadamine Russia is way ahead in D. All of the above.

@@Aasn9 Name a russian aircraft with better avionics and engagement range than the F22 or F35?

@@geoffreyleonard99 define your terms please re “engagement range” I’m guessing it’s about early detection and missile strike capabilities? Then I’m going to suggest that the “stealthy” are not so stealthy and that the range of air to air missiles would be the determining factor. A red versus blue was gamed and the conclusion was that “it was like clubbing baby seals”. Blue team were the baby seals and the JSF-35 “can’t turn, can’t climb, and can’t run” due to single engine and low power/weight ratio. No super cruise and no missile launch at supersonic. Russian radars pick them up early in Syria. JSF-35 has definite avionics issues as any quick search can verify. My country bought a dud to bail out LM? Airpower Australia did a full independent analysis and the results were damning. The F-22 would be the pick of the US aircraft and I don’t have much on the Su 57 except that it flies extremely well from my observations and would no doubt have long range air to air strike capability.

didnt age so well

@@jiro3428 Only in the mind of a Russophobe.

@@jotunblod you have a point, i focused on the saluting russia

@@jiro3428 Well... everyone knew Putin was a dictator, so why did everyone refuse to negotiate for 8 years? Because the West wanted the war, and they all admit it. Everyone is at fault. I respect both Russians and Ukrainians so much more than I do the West. I hate all the needless death, but people in Washington couldn't be happier.

the Su-37 has canards its even better than this

​@@tinfoilchampion3651 No. According to Russian engineers: “While the canard layout brought advantages in terms of improved maneuverability, it also added structural weight to the airframe. A conventional airframe coupled with thrust vector control, the source said, could now provide the same capability.” Basically improvements to thrust-vectoring have achieved what canards were doing in the past and this has been reflected in the design of the Su-35 and Su-57 which instead of canards utilize leading-edge vortex controllers (LEVCONs). The Su-37 never entered production. The top Russian air-superiority supermanouverable fighter (if we exclude the Su-57 for now) is the Su-35. The aircraft with the closest resemblance with canards is the Su-30MKI which is a joint Russian-Indian product. Indian pilots on Su-30MKI have routinely been doing wargames against US pilots mainly of F-15E and have achieved victory in many of the dogfighting scenarios. The first such join exercise was 20 years ago back in 2004 during 'Cope India 04' where Indian Su-30MK (not the advanced MKI version) achieved impressive 9:1 kill ratio against U.S. F-15s. It was a wake-up call to the US.

@@tinfoilchampion3651 N su 57 i believe

Actually, the Eurofighter is it's equal or even better. Then, the objective is completely beyond you.

@@user-py6bo1jz2mEuro lol ok

Тоже так подумал

Planes impressive but pilot has balls of steel but brains of mud. Engine stalls out and dead pilot unless he plans to demo ejection seat.

@@johnweiland9389 What?! O.O

See you havent seen many ballets

Bolishoi theatre.

Peace!) From Russia ✌️

This is fake, never happened.

CNN told me.

The Russians are useless with antiquated technology!

@@yianpap6093 Thousands of people watched it. Stop lying.

Colonel sergey BOGDAN the best in the world

Where is the vertical take off? It's a click bait.

@@GegeDxD it was so fast that you couldn't see it.

@@GegeDxD Go to the very beginning. It flows up 30-50 meters or so, then nose up 90 degrees into a vertical climb. It's insane, a lot of birds can't do it.

Stupid cant be fixed son@@GegeDxD

И что?

I love how when it reappears, it's just falling lmao

@@Lil_Thick This is called flat spin not "falling" that used in a dogfight and of course this is a trained pilot he knows what he's doing and can recover from it.

@@yehia4638 Vectored thrust helps, too.

@@yehia4638 a flat spin is just controlled falling…

su 35 also amazing

У нас все такие, дураков не берут летать на такой машине.

4:06

😅👏👏👏

Brao

лучше и не скажешь

No one is ever going to beat the Russian "Bear". Asked Napoleon and Adolf H. If you don't realize this, you're a loser and you're spending money needlessly on the arms industry. Greetings from the Netherlands. Российского «Медведя» никто и никогда не победит. Спросили Наполеона и Адольфа Х. Если вы этого не осознаете, вы неудачник и зря тратите деньги на военную промышленность. Привет из Нидерландов.

You have to take into account that its empty nothing weighing it down. I would love to see it do that with full load out. Its still nice to see it fly around.

@@marjanpavlovic211 obv we have to take that "into account", no aircraft in the world can even do what the su35 does with the same energies and also have a full loadout.

Retention?

@@marjanpavlovic211 full load out what for? usually the weapons are chosen based on the flight purpose. no sense to load everything. 2-4 missiles in 99% of situations.

Guess that pilot is Sergey Bogdan.

Made in Russia not by Americans in China--have you seen the Mig29 videos? Chess anyone?

I’m sure he would be impressed with all the digital technology we now have

@@johnmyviews3761 not anymore when the Chinese are making the newest computer CPUs

OpenReel and how would that happen, the su35 is far superior in a dogfight

OpenReel, Since your are in Germany: worauf basieren denn Ihre Annahmen, dass der F-22 den SU-35 um den Faktor 3 zu 1 überlegen ist?

Your raptor is a load of advertised bullshit - as well as F-117 now decommissioned. Just a waste of insane amount of money lol

@tk421missing They'll have another war where 60,000 more soldiers die and their mindset will change back again until another 40 years.

@@nmk3261 Why must we start closed-minded arguments about the superiority of fighter aircraft in reply to a neutrally-themed comment and video?

You do realize dogfights aren't how they look in the movies, right? Tight turns only matter if you get in close enough. And maneuvers that sharp bleed off huge amounts of energy. Even F-22 pilots know better than to stick around too long in the slow-speed zone where thrust vectoring provides most of the directional control. Because that kind of sharp, slow-speed turning may let you get in a shot, but you'd better pray you get it first try, because if not, you're a sitting duck... Now, whether or not the F-35 will or will not be a pig remains to be seen. But jets shouldn't be compared based solely on their top speeds and G-limiters. There's so much more going on. The reason everyone does so is because it's nice to have two numbers to point to and say "A is bigger than B! A wins!" Few things in life are this simple.

You talk at the level of an amateur, I'm sorry. The plane that you see is a multipurpose. All these pirouettes allow for minimal time to work more ground targets, the aircraft than any American would be more efficient and not as fast in the destruction of ground targets. It is not necessary to imagine yourself what it is for air combat. Do not think in terms of the 20th century.

Airshows never tell the real story. It maybe an impressive performance, but Sukhois in airshows carried very little fuel, and no weapons. Fully loaded, the poor Su-35 Thrust-to-weight ratio is only 0,94 -- even worse than F-16; its wing-loading is a whooping 500,8 kg/m2 -- worse than F-18F. And never talk about reliability and spare part issues for these Russian-made Sukhois!

Dark Rider well said

Not when the plane is carrying weapons, Andrey. Or were you planning on using your 150-round cannon for every single target?

Are you an emigrant from ruZZia😂?

​@@arunassilkas3207даже если так, это что-то меняет? Попробуй скажи, что самолёт фигня, блесни невежеством, ботомерма желто синяя

@@interpretolog самлёт ОК, потому что его не русня, а ссср создавал (то есть - и Украина, Литва, Эстония, Латвия…). А вы только танк из говна способны слепить :D

@@interpretolog te fut in flit

​@@arunassilkas3207Least salty American:

@ Your blind bias (and level of knowledge) is not very obvious, then.... As usual many Americans live with a false confidence believing they are the best at everything. It should be, as the US Government spends more on defense than every other country in the world combined. Yet reality is a bitter pill. Sit back and stuff another burger down your neck and vote for obesity and heart disease, as THAT is what the USA is truly best at.

@@Slaktrax ,..No "False confidence" ( as you call it ) here partner! You damn skippy I am down with the Red, White, and the mother #ucking Blue! As if you don't have pride in your country, whatever it is. You picked the wrong one to try and spin ya bull chit on,..try somewhere else..

D Joe The AIM missile is best known to have least accuracy. Any Su 30 Can easily deflect it. And one more thing that dancing is best at gaining air superiority during dogfight.

@@VY-zt3ph Inaccurate? Out of all BVRAAMs it has the best operational history, and a theoretical P(k) of ~.85, which is very good.

@ Having pride is one thing. Being a Dickhead arm chair expert like yourself is another. Don't misuse the word pride for your dirty attitude.

The Eurofighter can do it too :D

@@t.800XR There might be many more planes that could do it but you need pilots that also have enough skill.

все имеет значение это русское и точка

Russians can do, Americans can do PR😂...

Совершенно верно! Такие же мысли ,у меня были во время просмотра)

I’m Moroccan and I agree with you

Someone who gets it.

No need for emoji but ok

“Welcome to Russian express airlines we guarantee you will have a vomit inducing flight” but seriously I thought the engine stopped or some shit lol.

Even hornet can do that.

@ledufAkaDemy ledufAkaDemy hornet can do it as well.

@@anfrale4657 true with fcs override switch on the right of the cockpit the pilot can do supermanouverability maneuvers up to 85 angles of attack which is still worse than the russian su 35 which doesn't override but completely disables the fcs (flight control system) which has a risk of ripping off both wings of the aircraft if used in high speed while the hornet still doesn't allow the pilot to break wings by limiting the pilot both aircraft are a piece of art IMO but the war makes them look like machines of the villain while those engineers etc just wanna protect their country by helping them make aircraft the country uses it for bad purposes

Yep, if the United States has an aircraft that can match that maneuverability, I have yet to see it. Plus, that plane is just sexy as hell. Hats off to the operator, peerless skillset.

It's sexy I agree, but I like F14 tomcat too, I know it's obsolete but it was the most sexy plane in US aviation history.

Russians fighter jets are awesome its cheaper, sexier and better at manuver

@@nahyeahwhatsahandle Yeah ! Its like a lamborghini with toyota built quailty

Saxiest! Yep that's the word!

So why is it that Russia is losing its special military cockup ? It fantastic.

Yawn 🥱

​@@user-py6bo1jz2mтупой придурок, это только в твоих фантазия

@@user-py6bo1jz2m I wish you would bet all your money on Russia is losing.See you soon living under a bridge. 😅

@@user-py6bo1jz2m What planet are you on?

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Go there who ever wins

@@CuteKitten_DD he did

SU 34

komberi if they are Arabs or asians its ok😆

usa suck dicks all day....especially russian dicks.... u love it

The raptor is a failure as a plane, the su it's better you just have to stop reading yanki propagande and see the both characteristics

Like watching poetry in the sky.

+Future Pilot YES!!

+Future Pilot Best RUSSIAN AIR!!!

+Future Pilot nothing

+Future Pilot That's supermaneuverability for you. That move is the kulbit i think.

+Jasper Neuvonen This is "Pugachev's Cobra"

Скажи это госдепартаменту США...

megaapfel That doesn't matter. We born in different enviroment, with different cultural education, with different values. And every citizen of my motherland will fight for their values, culture and family.

Александр Мельничников It does matter. Earth is a planet as you surely know. If someone makes a mistake, everyone else pays the price. Your values are not different, this is the same one everywhere. Why do I find the same nationalist in my own country? Try to answer me.

Pilou Pilou Обама неудачник, хуже Буша

Pilou Pilou First two sentences are obvious, i have nothing against. About next statements: I don't agree. If our values were the same with everyone 70 years ago - Russia wouldn't exists, people would be slaves working for REAL nationalists. In russia most people are patriots, not nationalists. This is a different thing, we are not against other nations, we are very friendly with em and russia is a multinational county. But if someone plays bad with us - we do the same. And, you can find the same nationalists in your country because there are no bad nations, there are bad people in the world, but difference in - we don't support nationalists, they are criminals and offcource you think that patriots in russia are nationalist but that's wrong. I tried, your turn to understand, but i don't think you'll be able to understand cause different education, values, traditions, but every russian will understand me well.

There' no other climbing than vertical climbing though.

@@fzrewagfzaerfer Really? Haven't heard of "incline climbing"?

We know

Do you go down when you climb? Oh shit where's my brain.

Jf17 thunder did the same in paris air show 2015

Why is it good to see Russian fighter jets advancing? NATO countries are within range of these jets, which could demolish their air forces in hours.

@@johntechwriter that is a nuclear war! Please respect nuclear powers or else there will be nothing to respect.

@@johntechwriter I mean it would be a predominantly 4th gen fighter platform against a full 5th gen program with superior steath, acceleration, and range control. I don't think "demolish in a few hours" is anywhere near possible

Rafale...Nato...Friend! SU35...Russian federation...enemy!

Mr.Leviatumbelis you, stupid.

Mr.Leviatumbelis Why are they they enemy? You are evil.

tropickman you are right. i am evil! :D

American planes have thrust vectoring. 2-dimesional vectoring in the F-22, 3 dimensional in the F-15, F-16, F-18. US has also developed thrust vectoring for VTOL aircraft like F-35. So I wouldn't say Russians have better thrust vectoring technology. They may have been the first to implement it, but their technology hasn't developed a whole lot beyond basic PID control.

did you come?

El Risitos , welcome to Russia Airshow MAKS-2019! 😉

El Risitos Too bad there are no “masterpieces of engineering” in the Russian Dom forces. The SU 35 is a piece of shit that everybody knows it.

@@williamboyer1165 Modern fighter, powerful long-range radar, new missile modifications, high range, better maneuverability. Russian fighters do not need stealth, with them a lot of anti-aircraft systems. F-35 is not a panacea, low speed, medium visibility, medium range, full load removes all stealth. Over-the-horizon radars see them from afar, against a strong anti-aircraft system they will loss. PS Sorry for the English, use Google translate)

@@williamboyer1165 The more stupid BS I ever read about russian aircrafts...

@@williamboyer1165 Hahahaha. Is that why even American experts say that the F-35 couldn't beat the Su-35 in a dog fight in a million years. And that's why the F-35 (which can detect the Su-35 earlier) will probably avoid the Su-35.

Marko Nekoizmase And of course, if it's a Russian athlete, the graceful aroma of anabolic steroids! Nah, just joking. Lovely looking aircraft.

Well, it is certainly less "aromatized" than NBA players. Just joking, NBA basketball is fun to watch

Marko Nekoizmase Indeed. But I'm British so you should have had a go at our drug-riddled cyclists!!! It was just a "heavy cold" or "asthma" that I took steroids for...honest!

Damn bro you might actually be able to say you sexually identify as a attack helicopter with a comment like that lmao

I never see this aircraft doing more than 300 knots what's up with that

ur so right mxd6

Россия приглашает всех на соревнования в танковом биатлоне! Вот это хорошо!

Nice said, dude…. God bless you…. ;-)

Aviation Nut Well said... 😤👍🏽

Its pure ballet... Poetry in the air...

They're not crap but they're old doctrine and the new doctrine is all about stealth and emission control and situational awareness. As far as pure flying machines they're spectacular.

America has built some amazing machines over the years but in the past 40 or so years its all been plan by politics and its never once worked. Our front line battle tanks (M1 ABRAMS) are from 1982 and are the single oldest tanks in full use today anywhere and these where CHRYSLER/Lee Iococca products like those K cars). The Russians have adapted to designs that are inexpensive, easy to maintain, and solid flyers. Most of them are simply beautiful machines the SU-35 perhaps the most so. USSR is gone. This is Russia now which is a small republic nation about the size of the Southeast US. They have to budget tightly and yet somehow are doing this and producing these things. If only we here in the US could learn..... Although just yesterday the Pentagon placed an actual order for 8 brand new f-15 eagles that have redesigned air frames, engines, electronics, and avionics packages. Upon successful testing and AIR CERTIFICATION there should be a much larger order coming to the navy. The airforce is working already with a group of redesigned f-16 falcons and an order of those is expected this summer after air certifications this spring. NOT ONE SINGLE yf-22 or f35 HAS EVER OBTAINED AN AIR CERTIFICATION. An f35 was cherry picked for testing to obtain the 8,000 hour mark but last summer it literally fell apart on a runway at around 1500 hours. Even f4 phantoms had that beat by miles. But that was when we were building beautiful machines.

He knows it better than us

They're both drank vodka, what did you expect?

In mother Russia plane decided their won aerodymamics

thrust vector engines

No! Russian physics are other than normal physics!!!!!

Jeffrey Bucken Thanks, buddy !

supear

sim

gq

I think we all have a friend who told us that he saw a UFO.

that is not an air carft at that moment, that is what we humans refer to as a UFO

Maybe Phoenix & Dragon!

butt slaps earth cloud

Well, i think it's some alien pilot skills, those tricks are surely possible on that plane with a good pilot

This comment is gold

hahahahaha wtf?

Nah, not skilled enough compare to malaysian pilot su 30mkm ..

@@amirrx78 no one can touch sergey bogdan

@@blademanx go watch su30mkm stunning eyes on singapore airshow

Fuck that bitch

@@coolguy3848 this is Russia

@@whatintheworld6413Lol.....

Its not defying them , its playing WITH them beautifully

gravity ? it doesn't exist just freemasonic creation to fool people

Hahahahaha. Which bvr missile can claim to have energy to hit and shoot down su35 at distance greater than 60kms ?

@@pravirchandragadkari88 R-77-1

Great comment 🙂

@@Battlenude aim 54A phoneix

@@Alex96194 It does not exist any more. It went Out of production and comimision with the F-14

Ну чего? Ваш Раптор тоже ничего, только слепой...

medium.com/war-is-boring/d89b9ce721de no its a plane built around 60s engines and an old weak frame.

***** Lol it still outperforms the modern f-22 and f-18.

***** Pak-Fa is just a prototype..

Filip Šebök You Slovak pro US idiot- T-50 Pak fa is in service- already

Fridrich Hláva No its not their are only 3 made... And india just dropped its funding google it. India hates the Pak FA for some reason.

Otherwise no bread and vodka tonight!

Reminds me of German 109s, they flew like they didn't give a flying f*** if they died.

@ the us and russia and many european countries are fighting 3rd grade arabs sooo

The demon lord is inside that aircraft

and hellish g-force

Taking in account SU 35 is a heavy multi-role aircraft (not just fighter), its aerobatic is especially fantastic. Russians have Mig 29 which is 2 times lighter and bit faster and designed as fighter.

"White Swan" is TU-160 and it's even more awesome in terms of wow effect with no loops at all Just grace of flight, and the sound of course 😀

What I'm about to tell you would be a fly in a flight engineer's coffee in the USA. Russia was the first country to have jets that could exceed breaking the sound barrier.

@@geraldboykin6159 Um, no. That was done by Chuck Yeager in a Bell X-1 (Both American). Although Russia was the first to use PESA radar, so there's that.

@@sovietpineapple7938 : The Mig 15 is a relic of sound barrier breaking flight. It once outranked the USA's inventory back in the day. But things got better!!

too bad it's a killing machine

svrakata .svrakata Swords, guns, armor, shields or even tanks can be astonishing.

svrakata .svrakata It is designed by true patriots to defend people against enemies to come. People who created this jet thought of their families and remembered Nazis invasion that harvested about 20 millions of innocent lives. It's not designed for pirate raids to rob some small distant country to kill women and children USAF planes are mostly used for.

@@user-fr6cg1ym1u, 👍👍👍

ferze001 cobra?

trebreh dlanodcam nah it's just for the show

but very vulnerable in battle

it feels like when you lag af while mid air lol

Vectoring, great performance, the only thing, isn't a vertical take-off!

😂😂😂

Hahaha fck yes

Su 35 breaks previous 3 laws

Hahahah

Stall speed: No

This aircraft designer doesn't know what is stall

Has none

@@namyzarc8261 👍👍😷🇰🇿кутак желающий есть??э ук