Paris Paloma labour Reaction 

empowering and heartbreaking all at once

@@aeri_taylors-versionfr

Those where actually young adult women not children.

@@sierrabird2460​​​​⁠​⁠genuinely curious if you have a specific reason for needing to clarify that the accompanying chorus of voices were produced by “actually young adult women” rather than “children”.

@@anicaputo6289 do you have a specific reason for being upset over misinformation being corrected? Kinda weird that you are pro misinformation.

Also "it's not an act of love if you make her"

That line has a third meaning as well. So that he never lays blame on her, never lifts an accusatory finger pointed at her

@@danae8112to me, this line, it’s about sexual coercion. 😢

A hand is not the only thing that hurts women.........

Also pomegranate juice looks a lot like blood, which to me also symbolizes what part of her wants to do to him in her anger

You do see her candle get smaller rapidly. while his barely do. In paintings deceased people would sometimes be potraited with a blown out candle near them. to show you that they are deceased. i see it as her candle burning out for (because of) him. Either by his abuse or by childbitrh. which might be abuse in this angle? seeing she is adement on doing too much " labour" (childbirth?) She is gone at the end and the candle burned out... somehow it points towards a tragic ending for her. It also seems that she wanted to drown herself in the beginning of the song...

I believe those are wedding candles, so it also shows how little he contributes to or values the marriage. Plus he's toying with his wedding ring.

Also could be referencing "burning the candle at both ends" to mean overworking, meanwhile his candle is unburnt

Add "forbidden fruit" (because it realy was considered ro be the true "apple") , and "fruit or labour" / hard work.

The cacophony version is the superior version, in my opinion. the video for it is good too.

I agree completely ❤ it’s the superior version. PS. we really are done - we’ve realized we would rather be alone than deal with so much bullshit

It can happen crying too. Lifting heavy things. Capillaries are sensitive.

Where's the girl with the list

My 5yo did this during a meltdown @@Cees91

​@@Cees91not to that level and we both know it, cute attempt to undercut the seriousness though, clearly you're the target of this cutting read of a song lol

I was told at like 18 that I should never entertain natural labor. because I might end up blind.

im certain this is exactly the point

Have the child someone else "If we Have a daughter"

maybe because misandry and sexism doesnt exist in a vacuum, and this song represents centuries of past of women being oppressed while what you mention are expectations *created by patriarchy* which women had little say in. Birthrates are dropping as a result of industrialisation and inflation not correlating with income so young people can't afford having children, plus that we no longer force the expectation of having children on women as much as we used to, not your incel coded fantasy of "we cant get along". YOU cant get along with it. YOU are the problem if hearing a women singing about a shared experience of abuse makes you instantly react by crying about "b-but if a man". But it's not a man singing about it because men hasnt been the oppressed sex throughout history. You'd live such a happier life if you stopped victimizing youself for a second and taking everything as a personal attack on you instead of systems.

this song is literally about the constraints and labels given to us by men thousands of years ago, that to this day still haunt our society. why would a man create a song with ‘role reversal’ when none of these things she sings of has or ever will happen to a man in the way that ideals like these have clung to women for centuries. idk if you’re trying to be devils advocate or what here, but men never do write songs complaining about what opportunities on a silver platter have been given to them. why? because to be seen as powerful in these roles you list, will never be seen as a negative in the grand scheme of things, because men made it so. not to say that this structure should be this way for men either, but it was created by them. to benefit them. to serve them. and that’s why no man would or even could write a song like this and paint women out to be the ones in control. this is obviously just referring to women vs privileged men. hope this helps 😎

Her lyrics are no where near misandrist. Everything a woman talks about pertaining to men is not misandrist. Men are using that word Incorrectly all the time and It has to stop! She is sharing her experiences and there is actually history on the oppression of women and how we are viewed. And the past still has lasting effects to this day. It would be misandrist if she said men were only good for money. It would be misandrist if she said she hated men. But she did not 😒 there would have to be contempt for it to be misandrist. Look up the definition. Just because you feel attacked doesn’t mean that’s what it is.

This is a song about an abusive relationship, very very very obviously. If all you got from that is misandry then you have horrific view of both women and men

Because this has been the truth for women for most of history. Women were an oppressed group for a very long time. It’s just a song telling that story about what women went through and sometimes still do, not misandry.