Thanks for the continued insights/expose'. I came around slowly. As a young fan I knew something had fundamentally changed with the band around the time in question. I took Tina Foster's challenge to heart and honestly began studying the photos of before and after Paul/Faul. It was with a heavy heart that I realized the original Paul was indeed gone and that the rumors of his death were possibly true. It certainly explains why Billy didn't attend either his 'Fathers' Funeral or the induction of The Beatles into the R&R Hall of fame. (George was choked up as he spoke) Also stopping the Child support of Paul's German daughter (of course the DNA didn't match!) Most of all... You can tell of the sadness in some of their songs. From Ringo's: I get by with a little help from my friends, to George's: While my guitar gently weeps and finally, John's: A Day in the Life... Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band says it all, with songs and pictures.... And so they sang and let us in on the secret by introducing us to: THE ONE AND ONLY BILLY SHEARS... Thanks Billy, you held up your end of the bargain and fooled us, but giving us some great songs in passing... Perhaps we SHOULD...just... LET IT BE ...or perhaps we can't, because we loved and admired him so much and yes, even idolized him. Truly it WAS and IS a LONG AND WINDING ROAD... R.I.P. Paul, you brought such joy for a season...
None of what the Beatles have done since Paul's death is worthy of anything much, imo. Paul's 3 good mates threw him under the bus, didn't allow for a proper burial and memorial service for Paul's fans. John, George & Ringo did something unbelievably cruel and selfish by allowing the con to go on for all these decades. Sure, John, George & Ringo...put all the clues you want to out there but an imposter is still living as Paul McCartney. And what about Paul's family? Were they paid off, too? Seems that some of Paul's family was taken care of by Billy Shears according to what I've read. It's all sad and sick.
Y si no hubo un accidente fortuito?Y si no hubo accidente de coche?Su muerte fue premeditada y hubo complices.Al falso Paul no le importo lo minimo cuando le avisaron del asesinato de Jhon.Luego finge hasta hoy que fue su gran amigo.Que farsa!!!Sir Willi Campbel!!Nombrado Sir por la corona inglesa..Pero da para cuestionarse y mucho!!!
@TechnoPop Just the other day in Congressional hearings a Pfizer CEO was asked if they knew, when the vaccine was rolled out if it would stop transmission. She responded by saying that they had no idea whether it would or wouldn't. In Canada we were told by our p.o.s prim minister that the only way to stop they virus was to take the vaxx. We live in a world that bases itself on deception and narratives that sheep abide by. One poster on this video actually thinks it's ok to forget about Paul because of Billy's song catalogue. That's the kind of sociopathic idiot that becomes a "success".
@@coastdaze748you are right , however we must keep in mind that there were likely threats , and not just bribes , to keep the lie going on . Finally, John was killed and Paul’s death might well be involved . I think (that’s just my opinion) that when doing sergeant pepper they ( the Beatles and their producers)were testing the public to see whether people would realize that Paul had been replaced. Indeed the name of the band on that record is not “the Beatles “ but “ sergeant peppers lonely hearts club band “. The name “ Beatles” is only on the grave . Going out with the album might have been like, let us see if we can get away with the lie, but if we don’t , we can find a way out since we have changed the band name and everything, and we even introduced the new member in a song : “ the one and only Billy shears “! Unfortunately it worked and by then the 3 members left were already trapped in a very unpleasant situation , with Billy probably leading the band to another style/ contents and the 3 of them forced to comply.
Thanks so much for creating and posting this. It confirms so much visibly. Paul is round faced. Faul is thinner or sharp featured face. The energy is so different. Faul saying without emotion in response to John's death, "it's a drag". Like he couldn't care less, says it all.
Wow!!! Saw something I haven't noticed before, early clip shows early Paul from side on, which seems rare, his chin sort of sticks out more and kind of turns up, very different to the later Paul. Amazing. Thank you.
Paul was an absolute genius with the camera. The fluidity of his playing his hofner bass. Just the way he would hold it ,coming on stage. There's no comparison. The other guy ,trying to hard ,looking stiff ,like he's learning to ride a bike for the first time.
I'm a retired bass player, and let me tell ya',..the main thing that convinced me a few years ago, is both of these guys have different styles of playing! It's not hard to tell at all, but not too many videos have ever pointed this out. Most documentaries focus on the facial appearance, the height difference, and of course Paul & Faul's different mannerisms, but the stage presence did it for me!!... -Bob-
As a beatles fan i fell in love with pauls playing as a lefty myself. Now I'm playing Bass left handed and definitely have the capacity to play upside down but it would just sound off. So legit RIP paul, fly high Mr Kite
JPM Was a master bass player. With ease he played without looking at his fretboard, all the while singing like an angel and grooving to the sounds of the music. The imposter has to watch every move he makes and can only rock back and forth while he plays. It was easy to get his songs on the radio using the McCartney name. Although he is prolific,most of his songs are commercial, childish and fruity. JPM Would have never written songs like Do it in the road, maxwells silver hammer, or Mrs. Vanderbilt, just to name a couple. RIP, JPM. Thanks for another great video!
Thank you for posting this. I've followed this story since 2010. More and more clues coming out all the time. Some believe it, others don't. Here's another clue for you all. Ready? My favorite Beatles Album is Revolver and both the original Paul and the replacement "William" played on the record. Paul's bass line is 100% different than William Billy Shears! Wild man. Great edit, love your channel! 💌💌💌
On 2:56 as i see Paul's position is relaxed, but Faul looks really afraid or under stress,well,for me. I see that Paul had a style,but Faul could put a scarf on himself and he could walk all day like that. Paul was charming and had this impression of a boy,clever and stylish and cute. While Faull,well,he just needed to act as Paul,nothing more for him.
Today I put two different versions of ''Things we said today''to my grandma-of course that the first is from our Paul,the second one was pain for my ears. And she told me that they are two different people...amazing...IT IS SO OBVIOUS!!!
The thing I noticed is that the real Paul when playing the bass and him being an experienced left-handed bass player, he hardly looks at his hands when playing! Billy being that he was not left-handed looks at his hands a lot when playing. We have to also remember that Billy was around the Beatles and he is a fantastic musician in his own right and that is how he was able to blend in and take his place!
Heather also,in a Desperate sounding TV interview said that she had PROOF about something and kept it to protect their daughter and herself...Whatever it was she said that if anything happened to her,it would be made public...
The facial shape isn’t the same at all. Paul has a wider face and jaw Billy is much more narrow. You don’t change like that in a year and they started not getting along.
Paul’s face is rounder and his ears stick out more than Frauls! It’s so obvious these are different people! I’ve never heard about the story before. And just look at the car nobody could’ve survive that. !!!
The ears are in a different place next to the face. I always knew that there were 2 Paul's. Even when I was a little kid. Most of us kids could tell. It was obvious. Maybe our eyes were better than the older kids.
Yes, St Pwppers was the first album i bought, so fir me, Faul was my dirst glimpse of Paul. When i watched ‘A Hard Day’s Night’ i could relk that Paul was a different lad. I just told myself he must have changed in the couple of years between…
What about that strange new playing style with the exaggerated swaying back and forth? It almost looks like he started a spasm style of playing. Not very rhythmic, as opposed to the completely composed and rhythmic style used pre 1967. Long ago, there was a time in my life where I would reject things out of hand, simply because, being young and already knowing everything, I would not even consider something that I considered ridiculous. Now, I take time to consider what is told to me, to examine the evidence, and come to my own, unguided evaluation to come to decisions. This has both helped my personal life and when it comes to the women I have known, much sorrow and regret that I did not open my eyes much sooner. Take whatever comes your way and do not be so blind as to reject what comes your way before you evaluate it without prejudice. Prejudice is not just about race relations. It has an effect upon all of our everyday lives. Open your mind to other possibilities, it can't hurt you unless your life is built upon a mound of BS. Then it might be a disaster for you.
The more I look into the Beatles stuff, the more it becomes evident to me that the 1966 year (autumn) changed everything. After that each of them changed their looks (for example not only Paul but even John was unrecognizable). I came to conclusion Paul was murdered and it was camouflaged as a car accident (a brief announcement during the Hollies concert on the US TV promising an update that never came). The reason was John´s "Bigger than Jesus" claim, "Christianity will wane", the Beatles power. Faul is a handler, the same as Yoko. There have been many deaths around the Beatles since autumn 1966 (Tara Browne, Brian Epstein, Jane Asher´s father, Mal Evans etc). Don´t forget Brian´s gambling, debts and the Krays. Prince Phillip was a regular visitor to the Thursday club which was attended by the Krays as well. In 1965 a journalist quoted him (Prince Phillip) as saying The Beatles’ popularity was waning. (He denied the claim). You have to keep your power at any costs. That´s why Faul is Sir now.
It is strange that he brought the 400 acre farm in remote Scotland (owned by a QC in London) in June 1966 also later brought the one next door to stop 'sightseeers'. It might be they had this planned for a while but for what reason?
Something i have always noticed is how different their expressions are. Paul has a really particular way of moving his eyes and head when he is speaking, while Faul's expressions are completely different and unnatural when he imitates Paul.
If Paul McCartney really did die in 1966, the music video for "Your Mother Should Now", Paul is the first to walk down the steps, and the first to die, then John, who dies after Paul. Then George walks down the steps, and lastly Ringo walks down and he is still alive. They all walk down the steps in the order they pass.
With Paul everyone looked happy and energetic and Paul never tried to dominate. When Billy came on board all of the other 3 Beatles looked somber and pissed off-you can tell Billy tried to run the whole show. Also interestingly enough, when you check out the "Take It Away" video there's a moment when the camera zooms on Ringo and Ringo looks VERY irritated and annoyed. When I first saw that I thought "what the hell is that all about". Now I know why
YES, its kind of like the Apollo 11 astronauts coming back from the moon or something. You have to wonder if John brought Yoko to the studio for that reason.
The two are as different as chalk and cheese. We have been lied to and cheated for years. Paul was cherubic and had a charm that the imposter does not have. RIP Paul.
When i was a kid in the early seventies i started listening to beatles music and watch their videos. It entered my mind that there is something off with paul especially with let it be album.
1:00 in the interview Faul covers his mouth with his finger for around half of the time, I have always thought that he did this to avoid his fake moustache to detach from the lips, great video as always.
I have heard the song called = Yesterday, love was such an easy game to play. I have heard Paul sing it. And l have heard Faul sing it. And Paul sang in a higher pitch. Faul can't sing this song in the original pich because Fauls voice is deeper in tone.
And,when LADY MADONNA was first played on TV and the Radio,the Story that was PUSHED on us was that "Paul" was using his Elvis voice to sound the way he did. Then, Every song AFTER that he used his Elvis voice...Changed how he Looked,Played and Sang. All of a sudden now,also, he started performing, playing the piano...Its really Billy Shepherd.
Honestly they don’t seem the same or look the same at all. It’s so weird to me that people can’t see it right off. I don’t really like Faul. I don’t like his music and I love Pauls music. I believe Paul was murdered.
I bet Billy‘s crappy style is from the fact that he went from having no money to having so much money that he didn’t know what to do with, so he just splurged on things that weren’t necessary.
I read the book and watched the videos. One thing still bothers me though. In December, 1965, Paul had a moped accident, chipped a tooth and split his lip on the left side which developed into a lump later on. You can see it in the promotional videos for “Rain” and “Paperback Writer.” The “replacement” Paul has the exact same lip bump on the left side.
most clear so far in my opinion. these things are really hard to mimic since they are subconscious for paul but billy has to keep actively think about doing them and there is no reason for people to change their manners, postures, expressions etc. people keep them from young to old. good video ty.
Yeah, I'm starting to think there's something to this. I just don't see the same person in the pre-66 interviews. Chin is different, hairline, voice is different. I was watching the Johnny Carson interview from 84 and Johnny was asking Paul why Ed Sullivan told the audience that the Beatle's dedicated their first 3 songs to Johnny Carson (in '64) and Paul/Faul brushed it off and claimed it didn't happen and you can see Johnny react like wait, what??? In fact, it did happen. They dedicated the songs to Earl Wilson, Randy Paar (Jack Paar's daughter) and Johnny Carson and no one knew why Carson was included including Johnny. But Paul/Faul wouldn't budge and shrugged it off and Carson was genuinely confused by his reaction.
The German court hired a graphologist for Bettina’s trial , who found the signature of the man who gave the dna sample ( Faul) not matching the love letters from Paul to Bettina’s mother in the early 60s. They also stated that the signature was from a right handed person , if I remember correctly
The true story of the Beatles written by Billy Sheperd, June, 1964, paperback. The back cover states that "this is our true story as we told it to Billy Sheperd"... he also wrote several articles for the Beatles monthly magazines... interesting...
I use to be friends with the real Paul’s son on Facebook for many years….he told me the whole story, Paul was murdered because they couldn’t control him, he would not stay involved with that Tavistock guy’s daughter, he married a simple girl, a secretary, against their orders/instructions, in private. The powers didn’t like it amongst other things, she was made homeless after Paul’s death so she wouldn’t talk but finally married another man who raised the real Paul’s son. She was threatened by William’s cronies who got wind of the fact that she told her son who his real father was.The real Paul’s son looks exactly like the real Paul’s mother, the likeness is startling. Within months Paul’s son’s mother died of a fast acting cancer, which he tells me was injected somehow at her doctor’s office, I’ve heard of this fast acting cancer before in that it is weapon used by MI5 etc to get rid of undesirables. When he came out with the story on RU-vid he was constantly gang stalked and sabotaged as his story began to gain ground, his house being broken into, sabotage tactics and threats and in some cases physical abuse so he would stop talking, the guy had so much PTSD that he just got tired and gave up and has now gone underground, he was locked up for 4 years in some kind of place where I’m sure he was tortured somewhat to stop him from finally talking and it did the trick. I’ve noticed the Jim Fetzer interviews with him are no longer on RU-vid barr one where the audio is sped up deliberately so you can’t understand a thing that is said…..Tina Foster is controlled opposition unfortunately….controls the narrative just enough to have it not taken too seriously with holes in some of her theories, I knew he’d been replaced years ago by just simple observations…..sometimes digging deep in RU-vid comments reveals treasures, one comment I read was about where Paul is actually buried. The City of London is not part of England, it has its own laws, own police force etc, which is why I give some credibility to where he is buried which is supposedly under the cross walk on Abbey Rd, it was done at 3 am in the morning apparently and I cannot remember how the commentor was involved, he maybe just didn’t want to say for obvious reasons….maybe this explains the cloaked funeral procession on the famous album cover…explains a lot
Not convinced but I’m open minded enough to hear more of your story .. what you say is very interesting …are u still in contact with the real pauls son ? and I’ve heard a couple of famous musicians called fake Paul bill / Billy (cant recall exactly) but it’s captured on video and how did Billy have such enormous talent ? .. two musicians who are both musical geniuses …welcome hearing more ..
For those who don't know how to differentiate between Paul and Faul ..Well whot can I say ...but for me it definitely "different" .... Whot a really SHAME Billy Faulie ....
And pick up my guitar and play, Just like Yesterday (all my troubles seemed so far away) Meet the new boss (Billy Shepherd) Same as the old boss (Paul McCartney) Paul was the boss of the Beatles. They wanted the new boss to be the same. The Who knew.
Billy is a great professional, when he replaced Paul they were concerned on how to replace the creator of Yesterday, and he just said "i had some songs that could work, Penny Lane, Helter Skelter, Hey Jude, Let it Be, Get Back...don't know if they'll work". And when Beatles broke up because they could not continue with the fraud he just said "ok, i'll continue my solo careen...it could work
Billy Shears Campbell is taller than the real Paul. the two are as different has night and day, the sad thing is the mass media and Beatles fans don't want to except the truth. I wonder if Billy Shears will tell the truth on his death bed or take it to the grave with him? I'm assuming someone will come forward and tell the truth.
Billy for all the Paul that he is not earned his keep... British intelligence and the Beatles decided it best not to tell the world what you can plainly see with your own eyes. Those are two different people... Maybe it was right, maybe not but it was done in a time when they thought the world could not handle the death of a superstar... Thank you Faul for playing the ultimate role as our beloved Paul...
I have no doubt that Billy Shepherd would have to be one of the best actors on the face of the planet, I'll give him his due credits but when does the show end and for Billy to take a bow?.Billy would truly have to be the 5th Beatle, eat your heart out George Martin but they forgot to tell the world what happened. Imagine if your hearing this for the first time & you now take it on as fact that Paul is Faul & the world was hoodwinked. Firstly please forgive the other 3 members who squarely didn't plan for this to happen it was completely out their hands. Like all grieving relatives you let someone else organize arrangements as the Beatles were no different to any other family. Is it coincidence that Paul left(passed) at the bands peak in 1966 & the remaining 3 members were in a state of shock where they would basically follow what they were told to do in order to remain who they were. I truly hope Paul's death was an accident instead believing he was taken out deliberately in order to control the most popular band on the planet, however I have still yet to decide on that.The powers that be would have loved to be in control of the fab fours fate at any given time due to their success & Paul's passing conveniently allowed them to create the parallel or timeline for that manifestation to happen. So many questions we need to ask Faul if only he was forthcoming like "Did you know that you were going to replace Paul at a later stage or were you picked up quickly & secretly on Paul's departure?" ."How long did it take you to feel comfortable in your new persona role? or were you ever really comfortable living a lie?" "Is it true that you Billy were paid a salary by the order whilst the other 3 members were paid by royalties & their management?" "Did Linda Eastman know of the charade & wanted to be part of the fame as she always wanted to be a singer & blackmailed you into a marriage of convenience(not that she needed the money, her father owned Kodak Films).? I'm sure a lot of readers would like ask Billy questions here as well it would make great reading. You got to hand it to Billy who worked so hard at convincing the world he is Paul McCartney that Billy became a workaholic maybe just to forget about who he truly is.
No point in beating about the bush. He takes the DNA test and it's put to rest. Questions? He's got all the answers. He screws up though, on occasion. He said when he joined the Beatles they were already set up, which is bollocks!!! Lennon was with Pete Shotten and a bunch of his mates at a church playing skiffle and some Gene Vincent when they met!!!
I find it annoying that those who call themselves big fans can't see it he isn't even a good impersonater he just slightly resembles him it's not about being horrible to Bill he did some of their greatest stuff it's about putting respect on the real Paul's name did he die or was he too badly injured to continue john haliday appeared and soon disappeared again and the hey jude video it looks like Paul's in the crowd and it's not just Paul 66 to 70 they all looked different I saw an interview with Ringo and when the reporter said fab 4 Ringo said more like fab 16 so was there 4 of each just look at John we've had ginger John Japanese John fat John skinny John the beatles is an hard rock to break...
The clues are numerous. The main difference is the attitudes of both George and John. There was a genuine love in the early Beatles, where after the real Paul died in 1966. The problems began and the various relationships between George and John towards the replacement became strictly business. Why would John and George put all those clues in the later albums if it wasn't true. The final clue was when John and George collaborated on the song "How Do You Sleep at Night". This was after the Beatles had disbanded. John making the statements about Campbell farm, etc. It's too bad both John and George are no longer with us, but this lie has been going on for almost 60 years now. Those who refuse to accept the literally hundreds of clues, just are ignorantly compliant. The final clue is the live performances, there is no way the Beatles would have never played live again after 1966, if the real Paul would have been alive.
I'm autistic which means I hyperfocus on details. I also have prosopagnosia (severe face blindness). I don't see faces as a "whole", but as a collection of parts. I was born in 68 and my entire life I've been stumped by pictures of The Beatles. I could never tell any of them apart and had no idea who was who because they were the same height and generally looked the same in the early days. The camera shots were so far away and they were always in motion in their videos. Then I came to recognise George by the eyebrows and Ringo by the nose. Never for the life of me could I figure out John and Paul because there seemed to be a third one of them, or someone who wasn't John OR Paul in the later pictures. I finally got to know John by his glasses and the long hair but I've never had a clue who Paul was because he changed so much over the years but even photo to photo. When he's on the roof I was always totally confused and had no idea who that was. Now it makes sense. Another thing is that Faul always looked like an actor or lounge singer to me, whereas JPM didn't. He looked like a Liverpool boy. In the mid 70s I loved Wings but I was confused why he didn't sound anything like JPM from The Beatles, and didn't seem to have the same personality either.
If you look at the poster of the beatles white album you can see A early billy shears wearing. Glasses. Is that Paul or a great double. I Was thinking.
Definitivamente parecen dos personas diferentes. Incluso a nivel de lo que se percibe como sentimiento interno, Paul es juguetón, inocente, bonachón, abierto, y el otro tiene toques de gay, superficialidad, manierismo y narcisismo. No pueden ser una misma persona a no sea que Paul perdió por completo su alma, cosa que es probable... La fama, el dinero y malas compañías pueden actuar como detonadores de otros, menos favorables aspectos de la personalidad