Brother, first listen properly what he is saying??? And if Allah is the creator of the whole universe, creator of Muhammad as well,if there would have no God,there would have been nothing,he has power to make sun from a lust particle. So halaal and haraam is in the hands of Creator,not the creation being himself a creation,similarly if Muhammad was not wearing the what you call western dress,but doesnot makes it haraam,so what is halal,so one can wear it yes not obligatory. Now Muhammad was not wearing ,he would not be wearing out of habit,culture or he was having no knowledge of this or at that time it wasnot invented,but saying haraam is rebelling Nature.Is Nature superior or the creation?,as things used by Muhammad as sunnah are also first halaal being created by God than sunnah.Muhammad himself is bring created by God.So saying or abusing it with western culture with the seal of haraam is rebelling Nature with culture and rebelling halal with haraam is infidelity and you are among them. And secondly Sunnah means something else,Aadat (habit) means something else,sunnah can become aadat but aadat cannot become sunnat,and apart from Islamic texts there is ijtihad(independent thinking),to know the things that are not mentioned in those texts,so it is a matter of ijtihad,so the things that are not sunnah or aadah are termed as Mubah. Lastly islam is a global religion upto dooms day,so there is no particular dress in it except some rules of looseness.You are weak in knowledge.
first listening to him properly what he is saying,from the textual point of the view. Now let me add more to it from textual and natural world both And if Allah is the creator of the whole universe, creator of Muhammad as well,if there would have no God,there would have been nothing,he has power to make sun from a lust particle. So halaal and haraam is in the hands of Creator,not the creation being himself a creation,similarly if Muhammad was not wearing the what you call western dress,but doesnot makes it haraam,so what is halal,so one can wear it yes not obligatory. Now Muhammad was not wearing ,he would not be wearing out of habit,culture or he was having no knowledge of this or at that time it wasnot invented,but saying haraam is rebelling Nature.Is Nature superior or the creation?,as things used by Muhammad as sunnah are also first halaal being created by God than sunnah.Muhammad himself is bring created by God.So saying or abusing it with western culture with the seal of haraam is rebelling Nature with culture and rebelling halal with haraam is infidelity and you are among them. And secondly Sunnah means something else,Aadat (habit) means something else,sunnah can become aadat but aadat cannot become sunnat,and apart from Islamic texts there is ijtihad(independent thinking),to know the things that are not mentioned in those texts,so it is a matter of ijtihad,so the things that are not sunnah or aadah are termed as Mubah. Lastly islam is a global religion upto dooms day,so there is no particular dress in it except some rules of looseness.You are weak in knowledge.Brother, your argument is lame,first listen properly what he is saying??? And if Allah is the creator of the whole universe, creator of Muhammad as well,if there would have no God,there would have been nothing,he has power to make sun from a lust particle. So halaal and haraam is in the hands of Creator,not the creation being himself a creation,similarly if Muhammad was not wearing the what you call western dress,but doesnot makes it haraam,so what is halal,so one can wear it yes not obligatory. Now Muhammad was not wearing ,he would not be wearing out of habit,culture or he was having no knowledge of this or at that time it wasnot invented,but saying haraam is rebelling Nature.Is Nature superior or the creation?,as things used by Muhammad as sunnah are also first halaal being created by God than sunnah.Muhammad himself is being created by God.So saying or abusing it with western culture with the seal of haraam is rebelling Nature with culture and rebelling halal with haraam is infidelity and you are among them. And secondly Sunnah means something else,Aadat (habit) means something else,sunnah can become aadat but aadat cannot become sunnat,and apart from Islamic texts there is ijtihad(independent thinking),to know the things that are not mentioned in those texts,so it is a matter of ijtihad,so the things that are not sunnah or aadah are termed as Mubah. Lastly islam is a global religion upto dooms day,so there is no particular dress in it except some rules of looseness.You are weak in knowledge. @Adewale Abdulmalik true,he also didnot spoke English,he also didnot used pen,he also didnot used bed,he also didnot used electricity torch,he didnot used underwear shorts.He didnot used eye glasses,he didnot used scissors, he didnot used soap,he didnot used glass tumblers,he didnot used wood houses,he didn't used cells,he didnot used watches. These are all habitual/cultural in Arabic terms called aadat not sunnat,one more example The Woman of Arab use to wear blanket not Abaya or hijab
Lol nobhe doesn't. And Christmas specifically refers to Christianity hence why it's not allowed to say Merry Xmas 😂 Sh Yasir Qadhi is quite vocal and straightforward abt it.
Brother, your argument is lame,first listen properly what he is saying??? And if Allah is the creator of the whole universe, creator of Muhammad as well,if there would have no God,there would have been nothing,he has power to make sun from a lust particle. So halaal and haraam is in the hands of Creator,not the creation being himself a creation,similarly if Muhammad was not wearing the what you call western dress,but doesnot makes it haraam,so what is halal,so one can wear it yes not obligatory. Now Muhammad was not wearing ,he would not be wearing out of habit,culture or he was having no knowledge of this or at that time it wasnot invented,but saying haraam is rebelling Nature.Is Nature superior or the creation?,as things used by Muhammad as sunnah are also first halaal being created by God than sunnah.Muhammad himself is bring created by God.So saying or abusing it with western culture with the seal of haraam is rebelling Nature with culture and rebelling halal with haraam is infidelity and you are among them. And secondly Sunnah means something else,Aadat (habit) means something else,sunnah can become aadat but aadat cannot become sunnat,and apart from Islamic texts there is ijtihad(independent thinking),to know the things that are not mentioned in those texts,so it is a matter of ijtihad,so the things that are not sunnah or aadah are termed as Mubah. Lastly islam is a global religion upto dooms day,so there is no particular dress in it except some rules of looseness.You are weak in knowledge.Brother, your argument is lame,first listen properly what he is saying??? And if Allah is the creator of the whole universe, creator of Muhammad as well,if there would have no God,there would have been nothing,he has power to make sun from a lust particle. So halaal and haraam is in the hands of Creator,not the creation being himself a creation,similarly if Muhammad was not wearing the what you call western dress,but doesnot makes it haraam,so what is halal,so one can wear it yes not obligatory. Now Muhammad was not wearing ,he would not be wearing out of habit,culture or he was having no knowledge of this or at that time it wasnot invented,but saying haraam is rebelling Nature.Is Nature superior or the creation?,as things used by Muhammad as sunnah are also first halaal being created by God than sunnah.Muhammad himself is being created by God.So saying or abusing it with western culture with the seal of haraam is rebelling Nature with culture and rebelling halal with haraam is infidelity and you are among them. And secondly Sunnah means something else,Aadat (habit) means something else,sunnah can become aadat but aadat cannot become sunnat,and apart from Islamic texts there is ijtihad(independent thinking),to know the things that are not mentioned in those texts,so it is a matter of ijtihad,so the things that are not sunnah or aadah are termed as Mubah. Lastly islam is a global religion upto dooms day,so there is no particular dress in it except some rules of looseness.You are weak in knowledge. @Adewale Abdulmalik true,he also didnot spoke English,he also didnot used pen,he also didnot used bed,he also didnot used electricity torch,he didnot used underwear shorts.He didnot used eye glasses,he didnot used scissors, he didnot used soap,he didnot used glass tumblers,he didnot used wood houses,he didn't used cells,he didnot used watches. These are all habitual/cultural in Arabic terms called aadat not sunnat,one more example The Woman of Arab use to wear blanket not Abaya or hijab
Mr YQ Your beard is gradually getting smaller... I wonder when it will disappear and you r going to come up with fatwah on it according to your own understanding of Quran and hadith!!! Stop misguiding people and put a break on your mouth.
What? I hope you repent for what you have said and feel remorse. I don’t see his beard getting smaller and even if it is, then what is your problem? Some people make it lawful to shave, some people say that you should have a beard, some say you should have a fist length of beard, some say don’t touch it, some say it’s recommended to trim it to not make it look scary. What is your problem? See the purpose of the beard before you open your mouth. By the way if that is you in the picture, then why are you wearing glasses? Didn’t you know that kafirs invented it and it was invented in Italy? If you tell me he is giving false fatwas then you are very ignorant. Either you stick to your word and do not wear glasses or use a phone or you can simply be quiet. By the way; I thought photography was haram so why do you have a selfie of yourself?
@@leun6768 I am not sad about what I said . It is very clear that he has developed his own version of Islam. He got confusion on many issues that are crystal clear to the scholars of Islam. Check out the links : ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UHoW7qiKZRs.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xDufzB4rjSM.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_ON2b3xpfSU.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RHmUc0SM5Ag.html And many more. Personally I have no animosity against him .. Wa Allah ! I have no problem with him. But I am scared about the misguidance he is spreading ! I have no interested in his believes at all but really my concern is he is misguiding a lot of people!!!
@@shahmohammadabdulhadi3646 just because you don't like his answers doesn't mean he's misguiding people. You can't just say he's misguiding people you have to prove it. Allot of speaker's don't agree with each other .
@@PalestineandBFDI I agree with you. This is not about personal liking or disliking. I would suggest that.... just make a small research on his controversial statements on Yajuje-majuje, quaranic preservation , and lastly on the asking to the grave issues. You will get the answers.
