I’m really amazed by Secretary Carlos’speech. It was delivered purely in English language. I just hope that everyone who,listens understand the meaning of it, especially Robin Padilla. People like her should be sitting in the United Nations as our Philippine delegate
@@daxgarcia6606 Sa tingin ko naintindihan yan ni Padilla.....kasi....buong buhay nya naririnig nya ang salitang English....graduate ng Criminology...at tumira/bumibisita sa Australia nung hindi pa nya pinalitan yung dating asawa ke Mariel. HIrap na hirap lang yang magsasalita ng English.....pero nakakaintindi......parang mga ordinaryong Pilipino lang.....
@@daxgarcia6606 Naiintinhan nya yan kasi pinaliwanag nya na yan bago pa ang eleksyon. Obviously alam mo lang kung pano iportry ng media si Robin na walang alam. sobrang dami niyang alam about sa form of government kaso stupid ang portrayal nila sa media.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday that the way Britain chooses its leaders was "far from democratic", a day after Liz Truss replaced Boris Johnson as prime minister. Putin alluded to the fact she was chosen in a leadership ballot by members of her Conservative party, not by the whole country. "The people of Great Britain don't take part, in this instance, in the change of government. The ruling elites there have their arrangements," he told an economic forum in Vladivostok.
@@xyxyxyx321 I don't think papayag ang mga Pilipino na mawalan ng karapatang mag halal ng presidente. Dyan palang sa topic na yan, tigok na ang parliamentary. Nagsasayang lang sila ng oras dyan.
@@albertohusay3002 Filipinos are smart enough to determine ano ang mas magandang systema at I think pagod na mga pinoy sa 1987 OLIGARCH CONSTITUTION. Sa parliamentary always ang debate. Mahilig ang pinoy manuod at makinig sa debate. Case in point, madami nanunuod ng face to face, tulfo in action at fliptop. Like parliamentary, matindi ang labanan dun. Kaya Dito palang karamihan ng pinoy ay susuportahan ang Parliamentary System.
Brilliant! Excellent Sec. Carlos! Minsan lang tayo magkaroon ng isang SOCIAL SCIENTIST at ang background ay nasa ACADEME na cabinet secretary. Let us support Sec. Carlos, let us support our new administration. Godbless the Philippines!!! 💖🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭💖💖💖💖
Parliamentary is nice becoz the parties are the politicians machinery and what are the parties mission/policies etc … so ang labanan dyan yung parties (if we have 2-3 parties and what the parties stood)… within the party, one member can ascend to higher position (MP like in UK) based on his qualifications at meron siyang positions na inoccupy na nya so hindi pwede umangat dyan sa party ang walang alam at di umabot sa isang position prior to MP… they (the parties) discuss anu yung mga agenda nila and they vote (agree or disagree) kaya minsan makita mo sila (yung parties) nag didiskusyon sa parliamentary… tas it will end yung individual expenses pag election kasi yung party na gagawa
Parliamentary system can be awful because the Governing Majority Party/Governing Coalition Parties of Parliament can pass laws whatever they want without being judge by the court to challenge its constitutionality nor validity. If there's a disagreement within Governing Majority Party/Governing Coalition Parties then there will be an instability in the government.
Second to Sen. Miriam Santiago, Sec. Clarita Carlos is one of the person that i don't want to be part of my Thesis Panel haahaha kakatakot yung mga socratic ideas niya grabe. Amazing
Advantage of Parliamentary System 1.Seating Government is always accountable sa Parliament since the seating government is forcibly answerable sa Parliament. During question hour. 2.Fully Functional Opposition since they are the one who oversee the work of government. Kung baga sila ang bantay kaya nila directang tinatanong at ginigisa ang trabaho nang gobyerno. 3.Mabilis magtangal nang corrupt at inificient na opisyal through motion of no confidence na pagbobotohan sa loob nang parliamentary.
Aking opinion..Sana Dr. Carlos katulad ka rin sana ni Sen Robin na mag deliver ng pahayag sariling lingwahi natin, ni respeto namin yung mataas na antas ng propisyon mo. Pero Pilipino tayo at ang sarap pakinggan talumpati kung sariling atin at maliwanag intindihin sa kabuo-an.
ito ang tandaan m senator padilla hanggat nsa ibat ibang panig ng mga ahensya ng gibyerno ang mga kurap hinding hindi maitatama ng pagpapalit ng form of government kahit anu pang form of government yan.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday that the way Britain chooses its leaders was "far from democratic", a day after Liz Truss replaced Boris Johnson as prime minister. Putin alluded to the fact she was chosen in a leadership ballot by members of her Conservative party, not by the whole country. "The people of Great Britain don't take part, in this instance, in the change of government. The ruling elites there have their arrangements," he told an economic forum in Vladivostok.
I am an ordinary Filipino citizen and I understand the structure of parliamentary system which is applicable to this fast changing environment and technology.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday that the way Britain chooses its leaders was "far from democratic", a day after Liz Truss replaced Boris Johnson as prime minister. Putin alluded to the fact she was chosen in a leadership ballot by members of her Conservative party, not by the whole country. "The people of Great Britain don't take part, in this instance, in the change of government. The ruling elites there have their arrangements," he told an economic forum in Vladivostok.
No matter what form of gov't we will persue, if the same banana are running our gov't, we will not attain growth and development. CORRUPTION are the name of the game, good governs are the key
Wla naman po ata bansa na wlang corruption. Bigyan mo ako ng isang bansa na wlang corruption. Kumbaga, sa isang bulig ng saging ay mai isa tlga na sira. Kahit gaano kagaling ng presidente, hndi tlga mawawala corruption sa mababang sangay kse anay na yan sa lahat ng government.
@@gregomartinez2740 Countries with rampant corruption are the poorest among countries. It should be minimize as much as possible in order for us to move forward. If you are in favor of corruption so be it.
It is not only the president who is running the country. Executives also refers to the head & staff of every department. Please refer to the nations corruption index to enlighten you more
@@gregomartinez2740 Kung lahat na bansa may corruption na nangyayari eh paano umunlad yung iba at yung iba hindi? Saan ang pagkakaiba pala kasi inherent na pala ang corruption saan mang sulok ng mundo. Sa tingin mo ano at saan ang problema....
Hindi n kailangan baguhin ung sestima ng gobyerno ang kailangan baguhin at unahin ung mga nk upo ngayon s mga iba ibang ahensya ng gobyerno. In dapat baguhin at palitan .yan magandang paliwanag ni sec carlos
Simpleng Analisa, hindi ako abogado or politikal scientist..palitan na ang 1987 Cons. Ilang dekada na yan, Luma nah, subukan natin ang bago...tuwing eleksyon ng Brgy at SK opisyal, ginawang negusyo, pati SK na kandidato namimili ng Boto, eh dyan nag umpisa ang pulitiko kurap hanggang tatanda ,yan parin ang gagawin nya..Pag tuwing may kalamidad, pupunta kapa sa Central Manila para aprobahan, samantalang sa mindanao at visayas ang problema...
Yes, Democracy only works with a knowledgeable electorate. Kaya may nakalusot na image projection lang ang talent, e.g., Sen. Legarda. Parliamentary is much better than a presidential form of government, as articulated by NatSec. Carlos. But there's a third option, which can be integrated into the Federal Parliamentary form of government -- Open Legislative System, or simply Open Government, whereby people can directly participate in the actual crafting of laws, policies, budget allocation, etc. of the government in real time. The same platform that is now being used by the Open Source Community can also be used to create these laws, and policies, etc., NOW, so there's no actual startup cost to implement this today... Structural changes do affect behavior, and when people are given the opportunity to volunteer their expertise in real time, all problems of the country can be solved in a more efficient and cost effective manner. When people create their own laws, they would be more than happy to abide by them -- the long term effect would be that this country will have more politically educated, law abiding, responsible citizens for generations to come.
Ganun ka sana magsalita senator pimentel nyayon lang ako naka rinig ng magandang logic mo honorabe senator pimentel. Bakit iba yung logic nyo ngayon senator pimentel. I love your speeches dearest senator pimentel.
sana nxt time meron naman subtitle para saming mga di naman ganun kalalim ang pagkakaintindi sa salitang banyaga...nakakatuwa makinig pero hanggang duon lang..
Dr Carlos' promise of improved Bureaucracy can be achieved under the presidential form of government and federalism! It is time for our best legal minds and thinkers to flood the forum of public discourse with reason and logic! Dr Carlos is intelligent but it doesn't mean she's right!
What many people in the comments miss is that it's exactly systems that dictate how people behave. Kung titingnan mo na lang yung Corruption Perceptions Index, may noticeable difference. May recurring pattern. Lahat nang less corrupt, mostly parliamentary. Yun namang pinaka-corrupt, puro presidential. Di ko na lang alam kung pinanood niyo talaga yung video pero pinakapaliwag talaga yung sistemang ginagalawan nang manga pulitiko under a parliamentary system na sa sobrang daming constraints mahihirapan ka talagang mangurakot. Patalasan nang utak at bibig dahil may lingguhang debate. Madaling sumibak nang lider. Partido sa halip na indibidwal ang hinahalal na bumuo nang gobyerno. Doon pa lang damayan ang bawat galaw nang ruling party. Dito nare-realize ang mindset na "kasalanan nang isa, kasalanan nang lahat."; "Dapat umayos ka pwes damay-damay tayo dito". Sa parliamentary system nga lalakas ang party culture natin kung saan meron tayong manga tao na maninindigan sa kanilang paniniwala at ideolohiya. Eh yung political parties natin? Wala siyang ganong significance sa sistema natin ngayon, nagiging bandwagon lang yan na sinasalihan nang manga pulitiko para hindi mapag-iwanan. Yung problema kasi satin, naniniwala tayo na kapag may nalalaman tayong competent na pulitiko sa ibang bansa, kala natin sadyang mabait. Yung totoo pala, ang sistema ang nag-hubog sa kanya. Eh yung presidential system nga, ginawa talaga yan on the assumption na may mesiyas diyan sa paligid na kayang magpatakbo nang pamahalaan. Ang parliamentary system? Kinikilala na hindi perpekto ang tao. Kaya may oposisyon sa kabilang dako. Kaya may face-to-face debates. (Sa manga kakampink dito, diba ito gusto niyo? Debates?) Lalong nagiging mabigat ang pananagutan kasi hindi lang ikaw, buong partido mo damay. Nasa sistema na yan. Ilang palit na tayo nang tao, wala pa ring pagbabago. Kahit gaano kasanto pa nang isang tao, hindi niya mababago ang culture kung nariyan pa rin ang lax na sistema na nag-e-enable nang incompetence at corruption. Sinabi nang psychologist na si Armin Trost, kung binago mo ang structure, susunod na riyan ang pagbabago nang pag-uugali at sa kalaunan, ang kultura.
the Philippine government is strong and anti-corruption UNTIL MARCOS came into power. He alone normalized corruption in the government. and now, they are planning to revert to a Parliament system. WHY? because they want to stay in power.
@@boothyshake5438 You must be stupid. BBM and Sarah Duterte was raised in corruptions. The entire new administration are corrupt. All Philippines Government were and are past and present are corrupt. Parliamentary System might be the only way to change the system for good.
This is only my own personal opinion as I am here in UK Before the Philippines change to a parliamentary form of government can the country adapt one national language? Madali kasing sabihin yan na sige parliamenttary form of government tayo pero heto ang tanong anong language ang gagamitin natin kapag nagdedebate tayo? Tagalog ba, Bisaya ba? O English? Ito ang nakikita kong isa sa mga problema kung bakit ang hirap magkaisa ang Pilipinas Okay balik sa UK na apat na bansa ( England, Scotland, Northern Ireland at Wales). Itong apat na bansa ito may kanya kanya silang language. Pero kapag nasa parliament sila English ang usapan kaya nagkakaintindihan Iba’t ibang lahi rin ang narito mga tao na galing sa iba’t ibang bansa pero nagkakaintindihan kasi kapag nag uusap English ang gamit. Balik tayo sa Pilipinas mula Aparri hanggang Jolo, Mindanao nagkakaintindihan ba talaga tayo? Unless we adapt one language na maiintindihan nang mamamayan mahihirapan tayong sa parliamentary form of government
Singpore is multi ethnic country with different language but they use English in parliament. I guess English would be much better in unilateral conversation. Just my two cents also.
That is because Philippines is a diverse country. When it comes to ethnicity: BISAYA, TAGALOG, WARAY, MUSLIM, TAUSUG, etc., You cannot impose a one language in a Diverse country. Every Regions must become Federated States(with Autonomy) so that language will be respected. Remember how the National Government imposed Filipino (Tagalog) as a National Language?? Other language have gone extinct. In policy-making, it is best to use the ethnic language than the Tagalog. In conclusion, the Division among Filipinos is because of unequal developments between the capital and the surrounding regions. Monopolized ng Tagalog ang National Government. And aside from that, one size fits all policy and slow delivery of public services is an additional cause of disorganization.
Senator Padilla's knowledge and capability to lead the Constitution issue is so hallow. He needs to be schooled by Secretary Car!os for the next six years for him to at least catch up with the other senator's'. to lead the Constitutional issue. He did not understand the presentation of Dr Carlos
mas magaling ka cguro kay sen robin? feeling mo mas naiintindihan mo kesa sa kanya LOL ano ano naba narating mo ngaun! dapat camote apelyido mo! hahahaha
BILISAN N NINYO!! MAG DECIDE N KAYO KUNG PARLIAMENTARY o FEDERALISM FORM OF GOVERNMENT HABANG BUHAY P AT MALAKAS P C PROFESSOR CARLITA CARLOS! KAILANGAN N KAILANGAN NATIN UNG KLASE NG PAG IISIP N MERON CYA!!! 😎
OK. Not a federal form of government. I was not thinking of a federal form of government but a parliamentary system of which regions is federated. There are federal parliamentary system of governance, governing countries like Germany and Switzerland. A federal form of government can work, imo; provided it consist only of 3 states -the 3 main islands of the country. However, a parliamentary system may redound well to the Philippine political reality. Thank you for letting me qualify what I stated previously. The country may have to chose between a federal parliamentary republic and a federal parliamentary democracy. What the committee on charter change seems to be pinning is federal parliamentary democracy.
@@ethereal8743 bakit pnag hiwalay mp ung federal parliamentary republic at ung federal parliamentary democracy? Iisa lang ito! Mg k iba ung parliamentary form of government, kung pinakinggan mo ung paliwanag ni Prof Carlos, ung parliamentary form of government, meron itong shadow government, n kung saan ung shadow government ay ppalitan ang main government o government of the day. N kung mg kkroon ng lost of confidence doon s main government ay pwede itong palitan agad agad s pmmgitan ng eleksyon, kahit wala png isang taon n nnunungkulan ung main government. Meron b shadow government doon s cnsb mo n Federal parliamentary repubic? WALA! Kaya mg k iba ito s cnsb mo! ANG GALING MO INGLES!!
GB, NZ, Japan are federal parliamentary democracy examples while Germany, India, Austria, are federal parliamentary republic examples. There are distinctive differences between the two. Federal parliamentary democracy is what professor Carlos wish to adopt as I understand their stand against Munsod's "nothing wrong in the constitution" peroration.
Ferdinand Marcos' parliament was only parliament in name. Through many amendments to the 1973 Constitution he consolidated all the supposed executive powers of the prime minister to himself when he was just supposed to be a head of state. Cesar Virata was just a glorified secretary. There was never a real functioning parliament either under the Martial law years. KBL was the supermajority with little opposition holding the Marcos government accountable. By the time the 1984 amendments were implemented, the Office of the Vice President were already restored.
In a parliamentary system, Prime Ministers are not Political Appointees. They are elected. What we have during Marcos era is not a Parliamentary System.
Gustong magtanong ! ang taong bang NA convict AT PANSAMANTALANG nakalaya daHil NAG BAIL ay pwede TUMAKBO SA ELEC ? ANO ba talaga ang ating SALIGANG BATAS SA KASONG ITO MAM CARLOS ...
Senator Padilla understand fully the resource persons' speech in English but he remains talking in Filipino, as he promised, because he wants the majority of his Kababayans to understand what they discuss in the plenary session.
Both forms of government are organized in such a way that they both have various strengths. Due to the vote of no-confidence, it is easy to end the term of a Prime Minister within a parliamentary system. Meanwhile, it is much harder to impeach a president. However, Prime Ministers are dependent on the legislature. In contrast, presidents are completely independent of their legislative branches. They are able to make decisions that they believe are best in the nation’s interest without the influence of outside parties. Despite all the differences between the parliamentary system versus the presidential system, it is ultimately the members of a nation who hold power. By voting, citizens can express their voice and effect change in their respective countries, no matter their system of government. - Shreya Gaddipati
Mad maganda gayahin pa rin natin sa america Federal Presidential System para makapili tayo ng gusto natin leader ng bansa at gawin ang Vice president Senate President at both tandem na panalo sa election.
@@yambenedict8963 germany ay Federal Parliamentary System at ang gusto ng inappoint ni dating pangulo duterte sa federal constituiton ay napag botohan na tulad sa america Federal Presidential System!
Hindi problema ang form ng govt. Ang main problem sa bansa ay yung mga nagpapatakbo at nagpapatupad ng batas. Kung walang galang sa batas, walang mangyayari.
STU****PUD ARGUMENTS.. kung hindi problema ang form of government edi sana may transformation na ang Pilipinas in terms of status with its retained Presidential System. Nagpapatupad ng batas? They're all working under the same system. That is why there are no changes you IDI0**T.. Expecting a different result from the same system with same output is KABO**BOHAN.. kagaya ng mga uta**k ninyo na nasa kang**kungan pinulot para ilagay sa U**LO ninyo
Ang pagkakaintindi ko sa Mandanas ruling ay tataasan ang share nang mga LGU doon sa mga buong taxes na nakolekta nila doon sa lugar nila. Kung baga example ang dati ang LGU ay nakakatangap nang 23% allocation mula sa national government. Ngayon tataasan na sila yung allocation mula 23% up to $35%.
Professors in UP do not respect her. Ni wala nga siyang research paper na na published in international papers. Nakataas lahat ng kilay ng mga UP professors.
Mali po yon. Walang gobyerno na walang korapsyon. Walang palabas na walang kontrabida. Kahit nga vatican na mismo madami korapsyon. Meron at meron tlgang korapsyon. Ang dapat lng gawin is to manage korapsyon na hindi ito ang naghahari at kahit papano nababawasan at namimintina sa low levels lng. Naiinis aq pagmag motherhood statement agad ng "walng korapsyon". Wala nman tlgang ganun.
@@albertohusay3002 and kung mga ganyan rin klase ang mga nasa parliament wala rin ipinagbago. ok na sana eh kahit di baguhin basta alisin lang yung naka ugalian nang pangungurakot.
Secretary Carlos, kapag nasira po ang pinto ng banyo natin, iyon Ang dapat nating ayusin. Hindi Ang mga pintuan ng mga Kuwarto.kapag na flat po Ang gulong ng kotse natin. Iyon po ang dapat nating Palitan. Hindi ang lahat ng Gulong. Hindi po angkap na Sa katawan ng tao ninyo Ihambing ang saligang batas. False equivalence po yata iyan.
Tama po kayo alex. When only one part is defective, change that one part alone. Why include the whole body? That's too much and might be too dangerous for a total healing process.
Pano po kung sira lahat? Or at least more than 60% na ang sira? Mapapag iwanan po tayo ng husto kung patagpi tagpi lang plgi. Y do u keep on holding to a system na 36 years ng pinapatunayan gaano ka 3rd world ang Pinas? I just couldn't understand ur loyalty to that 1987 constitution. Unless mga sindikato kayo na malaki pakinabang sa constitution na yan ?
@@ehms2266 Sa parliamentary, hindi kana makaka boto ng presidente. Yung mga taga parliament nalang ang mag kuntsabahan kung sino ang next prime minister.
@@albertohusay3002 depende po kung pano mo tinitignan pano maeexercise ang people power sa system na mabubuo... Ang 1 sa advantages ng parliament is sila2ng marurunong muna na forte tlg ang governance, gisahin muna nila isa't isa. Pr bago iharap sating mga botante eh cguradong alam ang ginagawa. Weekly nmn me televised ng debate nila pr nakikita ng tao anong partido ang dpat susuportahan na me magagawa tlg pr sa bansa. Di uso ang bata bata system, mpp resign tlg ang walang kayang ma-contribute, lalo if magagaling ang mga opposition. We will be looking for a team, rather than paisa isang individual during elections... So ung mga Cory Aquino, Erap, Lito Lapid, Bong Revilla, Pacquiao, Leni out na. Di na puede ung kadramahan at pacute at me mga coach.
@@albertohusay3002 lalo na po sa panahon ngayon ang daming nagmamagaling... katulad na lang ng mga artista natin, kagagaling bumanat. Tapos mapapahiya lang pag me nagsalita na me alam tlg sa batas at pamamalakad ng bansa. Gets?
in a parliamentary sys of govt. hindi involved ang mga mamamayan kung mapatalsik ang isang PM. sila2 miembro ang magluluklok at mag papatalsik sa PM. kapag hindi nagustuhan ang pamumuno. ang poblema sa mga pinoy karamihan gusto maging lider... yun sinasabi ni prof ay pure leadership... hindi pa nya nababangit kung anu anung probinsya ang mag kakasama o magkaka grupo... at gagawa pa ng batas ang maging leader ng bawat federal group. malalim na talakayan pa yan mga kababayan... you can research abt. what sen.aquilino pimentel drafted abt for federalism... that was i think more than a decade ago...
In Parliamentary system, it is the Parliamentarians who elect the Prime Minister which is different from Democratic system where the President is elected directly by the people. Its disadvantage is it is prone to have a dictator if the Parliamentarians can be bought.
Iba naman ang England compare to the Ph, ang layo ng similarity ng dalawa. England became an empire in the 16th and 17th centuries. Di naman naging empire ang Ph or have conquered or colonized a lot of countries under a monarchy in the past. Sure they have the vote of no confidence, di mangyayari iyan sa Ph. Iyon nga incompetent di mapatalsik sa legislative or executive. Kapit tuko pa rin sa pwesto. Iyon sabi ni Coco Pimentel di ka puedeng mandaya sa eleksyon duon sa England dahil ma ostracize ka or isusuka ka ng mga tao bakit sa Ph, iyon mga sinusuka na nananalo pa rin sa eleksyon sa Ph?
Walang kinalaman ang pagiging isang kingdom o empire sa paggamit nang parliamentary system. Republics like Germany, Austria, Singapore, even. Wala naman silang monarko na tinatawag. If anything, mas maliit pa mga ang kapangyarihan nang isang hari o reyna dahil ceremonial figurehead sila. Hindi nila kayang diktahan ang isang parliament na demokratikong hinalal nang tao. Gumagawa ka nang manga kongklusyon sa konteksto nang kasalukuyan nating sistema. Hindi mo alam, ang sistema mismo ang nagdidikta nang pag-uugali nang isang tao. Maraming salik ang parliamentary system na umaapekto sa pag-uugali nang tao. Sa Party culture na lang: 1. Partido ang hinahal na bumuo nang gobyerno. 2. Yung manga natalong partido ang nagiging oposisyon na siyang nagbabantay sa bawat hakbang nang pamahalaan 3. May face-to-face debates linggo-linggo 4. Madaling buwagin ang ruling government sa pamamagitan na lang nang majority vote of no-confidence. Kung pagsasamahin mo lahat nang salik na ito, bilang isang pulitiko, mare-realize mo na damayan lagi dito. Ang kasalanan nang isa ay magiging kasalanan nang lahat. Kung gusto mong manatili sa pwesto kailangan mong nag-behave. Bawal ang papetiks-petiks lang. Kapag pumalpak ka, either mapipilitan magre-resign ka o ikaw ang paaalisin nang sarili mong partido dahil nakasalalay ang reputasyon at impluwensiya nang ruling government. Kung hinintay mo pa yung vote of no-confidence eh malaking kahihiyan na yan. Hindi mo ba napapansin na lahat nang "ministers" na nababalitaan mong magresign, nasa parliamentary system sila? Hindi lang sila nag-resign dahil meron silang delicadeza. Ang sistema ang nag-pressure sa kanila. Doon pa lang, nagbabago na ang mindset. Kaya mali ang sinasabi niyo na dapat tao lang ang dapat palitan. Sabi nga nang psychologist na si Armin Trost, "Once you change the structure, behavioral change will follow and thus, the culture."
Dito SA PINAS KHT MAY KASO pwed prn lumaban at BALINGBINGAN kapit tuko WALNG kahihiyan lakas NG apog kadami prn nkatago PAUPOUPO SA SENADO PAAMEAMERIKANA d BA KYO nahihiya pagalinganpero asshole...
Naawa ako kay Robin. Sorry talaga. Pero maganda din na may representative ang masa sa ganito. Para na i cocorrect ang mga no basis na mga theories napaguusapan sa mga kwentuhan.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday that the way Britain chooses its leaders was "far from democratic", a day after Liz Truss replaced Boris Johnson as prime minister. Putin alluded to the fact she was chosen in a leadership ballot by members of her Conservative party, not by the whole country. "The people of Great Britain don't take part, in this instance, in the change of government. The ruling elites there have their arrangements," he told an economic forum in Vladivostok.
Maxadong maaga ang full parliamentary stin, hindi pa ganun kamature ang politics ntn for that. So Federal semi-parliamentary, bigyan parn ntn ang mga tao ng pagkakataon na pumili ng national leaders, Pres and VP, pero isang vote nlng for them. Tpz ung VP will head the senate, wherein senators will be elected regionally. Tpz sa lower house, dun pipiliin ang prime minister, tpz xa mgging head ng local government. Tpz ung president ntn, head of the states, afp commander-in-chief, economic affairs, and foreign affairs.