@@OBCBTTB lol and those who do are wrong .and nobody in an official compacity should ever refer to a former president as president ,and they dont ,unless there nut job magas
@@a.d.j213The rightful president. Unless you want people like Maduro from Venezuela selling to Democrats stealing elections.. News flash he stoled the election at Venezuela for the 3rd time.
@@seesidesummerhouse6112 I agree but Beverly needs to go to couth camp. Quote from President Obama " I’m unhappy when I hear former Presidents and other ex-officials addressed as “Mister." Doesn't this belittle their importance? I was taught to address someone with the highest title or position they've reached in their career." Formally Addressing the Former President: When addressing a former President of the United States in a formal setting, the correct form is “Mr. LastName.” (“President LastName” or “Mr. President” are terms reserved for the current head of state.) This is true for other ex-officials, as well. When talking about the person to a third party, on the other hand, it’s appropriate to say, “former President LastName.” This holds for introductions, as well: A current state governor is introduced as “Governor Tom Smith,” while you’d introduce an ex-governor as “former Governor Jim Bell.”
Apparently, the thoughts are now that he wasn't hit by a bullet at all, but by a piece of flying debris. That would account for the strange angle and the lack of damage to him. RIP Corey Comperatore, who hit by a real bullet.
@@troyjenkins3886 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. (Rev 13:3)
@@troyjenkins3886 Hit by a bullet and no damage. Are you paying attention. No blood on his white shirt or his hand that he grabbed his ear with. Donable Lector said there was lots of blood. 😂😂
@@jvallas "Former president" is most common in the US. Sometimes you'll hear a Mr. President. trump's perfidies and attempt to keep office after losing his election have caused some people to refer to trump as Benedict Donald, Quisling, or just Git-face.
@@gailflorence2007 Hes only a criminal because they had to ammend a law to turn what would of been misdemeanors at the very most into felonys so they could go after him.People see through this bs
@@troyjenkins3886 😂😂😂😂 Another brainwashed MAGAT. Falsifying business records is a felony not a misdemeanour. Paying off a porn star during his campaign so she won’t tell anyone he was with her while his wife was in hospital having Baron is election interference! Anything else you need to be sorted out with?
@@JamesBurdon-gu5yu even a felon who never did the work that comes with being a president, but just golfed, tweeted, had executive time, flushed documents down the toilet, and then golfed and tweeted some more, and when he lost another election so badly that the electoral college couldn’t help him, lied about it and incited an insurrection.
@@ShariHarris-ok7lf A. Not american. B. A past president can legally and historically has heen referred under the title of president C. The reason people have said that is because ballot fraud via mail in votes did occur and democrats have chosen illegal immigration as a tactic to boost their votes.
It is common practice to call former presidents in america, president. President Obama, President Bush, President Carter and will be the same for Biden.
No it's not @ OBCCTTB. The more intelligent ones do use "former" or "previous" in front of something of the past. I've heard the smarter ones use it countless of time. It's just basic English. The cult followers do it knowing it's bad English, on purpose all the time when referring to their cult leader mental-case, weirdo orange, lying, convicted felon buffoon. It's that simple, and yes, very annoying while it confirms so many dumb and dumber bummers living in the U.S.
There was no reason to be taking a picture at that moment. Combine this with the fact that the trajectory doesn't line up with the top of the ear.... Suspicious.
One thing that I haven't heard discussed, why did the televised videos show a completely cloudy background above the bleachers, but the bullet background is of a clear bule sky?
I believe this image is of a fragment of some sort, I would guess, not a bullet. But it does line up with the top of the ear. The photographer is clearly at the same level Trump's head is but is aiming the camera at an angle. The head is about 6 inches wide. The path appears to be about 2 inches too low. Assuming the path does line up with the top of the right ear, the angle needed to make it appear 2 inches below the left ear is arctan ( 2 / 6 ) or about 18 degrees. This looks about right. The camera is looking up at an angle of about 18 degrees.
Just look at the photo carefully. If that is the path of the bullet which is dead horizontal it would have been shot from near ground level and it is level with the bottom of his ear not the top.
I noticed the same thing. Unless his head along with body is tilting his head to the left (Which would raise the right ear) or his right ear is mounted higher on this head. I agree with you its strange. I think maybe the cameraman did some photo shop.
@@nothere7198 I think you raise a fair point. Similar to standing under a telephone pole where the wires are parallel since you are lower than the wires (Like the view at trump) the wires will appear so that the furtest wire (trumps right ear) will appear lower than the closer wire. The higher you go the closer the two wires will look until they perfectly over lap when you are at their level. But.. The closer the wires are together this effect goes away. if they are 10 feet apart its more dramatic if they are 1 mm apart no matter what you do you won't be able to one above the other. His ears are probably 8inches. The angle below him does not look sufficient to cause the amount of disparity seen in the photo. I've taken the photo in paint with parallel lines for each ear. Unless he has more head tilt to his right ear it still looks to be too much. Without knowing the the distance to trump and the height of the camera in relation to trumps head I can't be certain. The closer and lower they are the better it is for the illusion to be true. The further they are (telephoto lens) its more likely the picture was photo shopped. Get me that info and I will give the answer.
Why would someone sacrifice civilians for a photo shoot. A patsey never makes it to the court room. Can't be trusted and neither can the secret service.
There were 3 very quick shots before trump squatted down. I would have thought that someone good enough to get that close to his head would have had one of those 3 bullets land. I can't stand trump, never could, he is everything I brought my kids up not to be. But, that doesn't mean I want him shot. I am glad no bullet landed but I am not convinced it wasn't a show to get his ratings up. I am sure that nobody was supposed to die that day though. I have seen his ear and there isn't a bullet hole it looks more like a surface scratch. No stitches..no medical report and no wound to show off. Alex Jones was on air shortly before this happened saying something like that sure would increase his ratings. 🇺🇲💙🇺🇲💙🇺🇲💙🇺🇲
A bullet does not draw a vapor trail, this is a plane in the far distance. The bullet speed from an AR15 is 2250 mph. No way 20 frames per sec will do to make this shot. You need 20.000 - 40.000 frames per second
Actually, they can. Especially high velocity rounds in a humid atmosphere (and I have no idea whether it was humid there or not). Look it up. And you don't need a fast frame rate to catch the vapour trail, only the actual bullet, which this is NOT, obviously...
Undoubtedly, a bullet CAN leave a vapour trail. Sudden decompression of air that has high humidity will leave a vapour trail. Though of short duration, such a vapour trail will last more than long enough to be captured at 20fps. Ever heard of a Wilson cloud chamber? By momentarily supersaturating the air in a chamber you can produce vapour trails from particles as small as protons, neutrons or electrons. They are clear enough to be seen by the naked eye and could be recorded on a box brownie with care. It’s also clear that the bullet did not hit the top of his ear. Possibly, a bit of plastic wadding from the cartridge. At that sort of velocity even a graze by a bullet would cause extensive damage that would not miraculously heal in three days.
@@BjBeamDid you know there was a UFO spotted that day and the American flag turned in a shape of an angel? Oh have you heard cameras taking many multiple photos in seconds?
@@davidmacphee3549 Why no great panic ? When a concert or Mall has a shooting the people are going out of their minds screaming and running. That is believable.
That's exactly what I thought. It looks like it's either in the middle of his ear or down below to not even hit his ear. But there is no way that it hit the top part of his ear unless it magical moved upward. Something is off about the entire situation, and he still hasn't put out the medical records.
Exactly and the bullet that never made his ear profusely bleed but you can see on the hat that the Secret Service was caught holding for the photo op 1 inch above where his ear actually would have been there is a 2 inch long red strip you know probably the size of a WWE prop packet that's why he's slapped his hat
@@denisbradley9289 it was a WWE performance that's probably why the Hulk showed up you know the Epstein document dump was supposed to have been breaking news because his Frenemy Rhonda sanctimonious had just released it he had spent that week on the golf course you know plotting and if you read his text messages they sure are alluding to something like this just like his j6 tweets did in hindsight
@@LisaMitchell-f8e not a drop on the white shirt either. Donable Lector said there was lots of blood. Face stained with a strange colour. He played golf the next day without covering the ear.
@@OBCBTTB The only one who is called "the president", is the one currently in office. All others are called "former president" or "ex-president". Once they're dead, you can call them "President Lincoln", or "President Kennedy", because that's what they're most famous for.
@@joannews The only one who's referred to as "the president", is the one currently in office. The others are called "former president" or "ex-president". Once they're dead, they are referred to by "president" and their name, like "President Lincoln" or "President Kennedy".
He wouldn't release his tax returns because he didn't want us to know he wasn't as rich as he claimed Now Jr goes ballistic when anyone suggest it wasn't a bullet, just shrapnel and the medical records would answer that
Did anyone do any Analysis on this Photo, It looks like someone PhotoShoped this Picture: 1:) What was the Frame Rate or Flops per second? 2:) What was the perspective of the person taking the Image? 3:) Did anyone check the Edges / Outlines? 4:) Did anyone Know what was the rate of speed of the bullet to justify the trailing length in this picture? 5:) without knowing the answer for #2 it seems that Trajectory / path of bullet is wrong? And there is More question?
The only thing that we can tell by this picture is Rate of speed of bullet and Camera frame rate, which can give us starting point to End point per Frame if it is true. At this time it dose not seem to add up? The FBI investigation should have a 75% chance of accuracy and it will take at least 3 to 4 months for a reasonable time. Based on the photographers own statements there should be more frames that should help in analyzing the validity of this photo. That dose not include the Meta Date per Frame should be intact.
There are at least 4 possibilities that I can think of 2 are Normal the other two are conspiracies theories from each side which are useless waste of time.
Actually, it's even lower than you think because the photo was taken at an *upward* angle which makes the alleged projectile seem higher that it really was. Also, the trajectory appears virtually horizontal which would be impossible if fired from a rooftop.
My best guess is that we are seeing an image of a bullet that missed Trump, not the one that hit his ear. If we could see all the frames a second before and a second after this frame it would be clear.
I believe the bullet on the photo is not the bullet that hit him. As you can see he's already grimacing so I think the bullet has already nicked his ear and this is a second bullet.
@@PatsySelf-mg9nn The bullet hit his right ear, but the photo is looking at his left ear. The shot is from below the podium looking up at him. Less cropped versions of the photo have more of the podium visible, and if we assume that the podium is a rectangular box that is level with the ground it seems we are looking up at Trump more than I would have thought based on just looking at Trump in the photo. I think that is enough to make it plausible that this is the bullet that hit his ear.
The shooter was firing from an elevated position. But only about 20 feet. From 450 feet away, the downward angle is only arctan ( 20 / 450 ) or about 2.5 degrees, pretty flat.
@@Joseph-xt2qg Regardless of perspective, something that's parallel to the ground is always gonna look parallel to the ground, whether you're below it, above it, seeing it from the side, or from a helicopter, or from a bicycle. If you're saying shooter was higher (roof) than trump's fat head, on a 4ft riser/standing at podium... well trump is 6'3" (finally! he's caught in a lie he cannot deny!!) + 4 ft platform... that's 10ft+. That roof was on a bldg w 10 ft walls and a pretty flat roof, shooter prone. That actually works. But it is defly a case of Wag The Dog, because Ol' dumpty is fraying at the edges and knows he can't bring this election to his desired conclusion. And then Pootie will release THE PEE-PEE TAPES!! 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛
20 frames per second will not capture a bullet in flight. That round would still be doing about 2600 feet per second at that distance from leaving the barrel. The path of the bullet would not be flat and parallel to the ground. If you believe that photo shows the track of the round, then you most likely believe that Oswald fired it
But dumpty did tell us he A) heard the whizzing sound as the bullet passed his ear B) *FELT* the bullet pierce his ear Either way, if that particular bullet is the one (if there was one) that hit his ear, it likely would've changed course a couple mm and continued on in a slightly different path.
20 frames per second does not tell you anything about the SHUTTER SPEED. It tells you about the FRAME RATE. Now, let's assume the picture is real, and that the projectile was from an AR-15 and traveled at around 900 m/s. This picture shows the atmospheric disturbance from the bullet, not the bullet itself. The lenght of the disturbance is about 30 cm. This means the shutter speed of the camera was around 1/3000 of a second. It was a clear day, sunlight and hot, so with a shutter speed of 1/3000 second, an aperture of 2.8 and an ISO setting of 100, this gives EXACTLY the correct exposure for sunlight.
that bullet is not on a trajectory that would have struck his ear. It is lower. A second bullet? Maybe a first shot that missed. But was it from the same shooter?
It 2nd or 3rd one. Trump has a hand rising on this picture already. It looks like badly mounted/calibrated scope on a gun or lack of experience as he (shooter) clearly was shooting to the left of Trump's head. Maybe a matter of position he was laying on a roof.
@@obscuritystunt I mean, I don't think it looks like that, but to really solve it we'd need to take accurate measurements, which we don't have. But also, anyone who's comfortable definitively asserting that the assassination attempt is a hoax based off of their qualitative analysis of a single photograph should, at a minimum, be understanding of people who believe that the 2020 election was rigged that January 6th was inside by the FBI, etc. It is just as belief-based as those things.
@@Joseph-xt2qg How does parallax angle, or perspective, play into the fact that the televised video, at the exact same moment, revealed that the sky behind was completely cloudy while the photograph had a bright blue sky behind? If there were bright blue sky behind the bullet, that would imply that the bullet was well above his ear, but it appears to be well below. That would require that the bullet be much farther behind his ear and impossible to have hit his ear. It would also require an impossible location for the photographer who does not appear in the video at all. That has nothing to do with any other events, unless God suspended the laws of physics for the day and temporarily implemented some science fiction model of physics, like the Einstein model.
@@heracles3523 only way possible would maybe be with a phantom camera 🎥 & they would have to search thru frames for a while to find the “shot”.. def fake anyone who’s watched slo-mo bros know how frames work
This is BS! I have a 20 yr old version of Photoshop, and I could replicate this photo with bullet in about 10 minutes! That's about 1 foot of travel for the bullet and since a bullet fired from an AR-15 with a 16″ barrel travels at about 3,250 feet per second, he would have to be filming with shutter rate of 270 frames per second. That is not reality!
@@byugrad1024 You are very quick and sharp. No kidding about the little line of fog designating the path of the bullet, (if there was a bullet...) Again, I could MANUFACTURE that image with my old Photoshop in about ten minutes. Take the photo of Trump, grab some grayish cloud fog, paste it & then squeeze it down to the exact line showing in the photograph. Fade the edges....easy peasy...coffee didn't even get cold...
@@byugrad1024 how can you see the vapor? or how can you capture the vapor? in the night, yes you can see the bullet flying, because it is dark, actually you se the light, the friction between the air and the flying bullet produces light, and you are far from the bullet, maybe one mile or more, but if you are near the bullet ten or twenty feet, you will not see the light.
Why is the bullet trail level. This guy was on a rooftop shooting down. Also if to extend the bullet trail back toward Trump it catches the bottom of his ear not the top.
Maybe he was hiding something in his shoe? How did he end up getting out of his shoes? Did secret service really take a break from trying to save tRump's life so he can put his shoes back on? tRump; "If I die today, I. want to die with my shoes on!" When he was fisting the air saying Fight, fight fight, looked more like he was trying to swat the mosquito that bit him.
Trump, feeling the impact, raises his hand to touch his ear. The sequence is as follows: first the impact, then he starts to raise his hand. But the hand is raised at the precise moment of the impact. Trump must necessarily have started to move his hand towards his ear before the impact.
Why does this man constantly refer to Trump as ‘The President’? I’m not American, but I’m pretty certain that Biden is the current president of the United States!
The line behind is in an upward trajectory. Shooter was shooting down at Txxxx from a rooftop to the stage. Not to mention you can photoshop anything. Additionally, anyone who knows about the ammo rounds for an assault rifle will tell you Txxxx’s ear would have extensive tissue damage, not just a minor flesh wound. There is far too many questions unanswered about this whole event.
It takes a "special" kind of camera to film a bullet...a high speed camera or sorts and makes me wonder why a photographer would have a camera like that on this occasion.
Your point is what I can't get my head around on-top of that the secret service would basically be allowing him to get hit by a possible second shooter
He's not "independent," he's a photographer for the New York Times. News photographers normally have cameras that take dozens of shots per second. They take hundreds of pictures and sort through them to decide which ones they want to use
I still find it hard to believe, the bullet in the picture was in that position shown in the photo 1/3 second before anyone could have heard it being shot. The bullet would be travelling at approx mach4 (3000feet per sec.) the trail shows a distance of around 1 foot long which means the photo was taken 1/3 sec before anyone heard anything and being in that position for 1/3000th of a second meaning that the exposure time had to be 1/3000th sec,which would require a video being shot at 3000 frames per second??
I worked as a photographer on a military test base. It takes a high speed camera to capture a bullet in flight. That 20 fps you wouldn’t even capture a tank projectile. Nice try
This is absolutely codswallop. 3200 hundred feet per second? Seriously!! From 90 deg never happen. You would only ever see that round through the air from the shooters position, only then through optics. The air displacement called "swirl" is what you may pick up, only then in certain conditions conditions
“If the gunman was firing an AR-15-style rifle, the .223-caliber or 5.56-millimeter bullets they use travel at roughly 3,200 feet per second when they leave the weapon’s muzzle,’’ Mr. Harrigan said. “And with a 1/8,000th of a second shutter speed, this would allow the bullet to travel approximately four-tenths of a foot while the shutter is open.” “Most cameras used to capture images of bullets in flight are using extremely high speed specialty cameras not normally utilized for regular photography, so catching a bullet on a side trajectory as seen in that photo would be a one in a million shot and nearly impossible to catch even if one knew the bullet was coming,” he said.
Exactly. I reckon it is too much of a horizontal angle that doesn't match up with an angle coming from the roof of a building. My other thought is that there are two other sheds that were to the right of the stage when looking front on to Trump. Those sheds were outside the Secret Service Security border, on Lakeside Road. Also seems to make more of an accurate take to clipping Trumps ear when he turns his head slightly to the right. There is no way that the person on the roof of the building who supposedly did that shot would have clipped Trumps ear. Trump would have had to have turned his head to his right more than 90 degrees. Look on google maps and it shows clearly.
@@DallasDunlop-s6y The length of the bullet trajectory caught in image is about 1 ft, ballpark. At the supposed 1/8000 exposure time and bullet velocity of 2600 to 3000 ft per second there should only be about 4.5 inches or less of the trajectory captured. Plus, the background was mostly cloudy on the televised video, but the bullet was imaged in clear blue sky. A jet contrail not a bullet.
I'm laughing at this photo. I can slap a streak identical to that one into a photo of me in 5 minutes. Have you never heard of Photoshop? You probably think everything in Star Wars was real. That work was done in 1976, nearly 50 years ago.
until a doctor comes up with the report that what he had was a bullet hole and not a shrapnel, that bullet is the one that took the life of an innocent bystander.
So the shooter was at eye level with the target. If it was a 5.56mm round it would have torn the target to shreds. And this photographer also took the photo of the Flag rising on Mt Suribachi . Give me a break.
@@greggiles7309 if we assume that, then Donald's head was at about 9 feet, and the shooter, laying on the roof, was at around 12 feet. That means the bullet's angle would be about 0.41° downward, which to the naked eye looks essentially flat. Even if we assume the roof was 15 feet, that still less than 1°, which is very hard to see
In this photo how do you explain that a straight line trajectory of that "bullet" would be hitting the BOTTOM of his right ear (the lobe) and not the top ? I don't think he could have leaned his head to to his right that fast.
That is NOT the image of the bullet it is in fact the contrail left by the bullet that had passed with the light reflected from th water vapour droplets..
Google search: can a pro sports camera capture a bullet in flight? “Most cameras used to capture images of bullets in flight are using extremely high speed specialty cameras not normally utilized for regular photography, so catching a bullet on a side trajectory as seen in that photo would be a one in a million shot and nearly impossible to catch..."
Ok here is my findings on the photo: It is most certainly possible that photo is real. The math/physics align. Reports say ~150yards, shooter used AR-15 with 5.56 rounds. At that distance the fps of that bullet can range from 2600-2800 fps. So math-wise need the units to cancel out to determine movement of bullet during that time: 2800ft/sec * 1sec/8000 = 0.35ft which is 4.2". Keep in mind the 5.56 bullet, so from my source that size fired is 2.260" long. Please correct if wrong So the bullet in the photo should have a mean of length of 4.2+2.26=6.46" So because there is no true clocked bullet speed I would suggest 6"-8" long. And that is pretty dang close to the photo.
@@michellapointe2309 okay, imagine this: The photographer was standing below Trump. The bullet was behind him. Due to perspective, Trump would appear elevated relative to the bullet. Also, if someone were to fake the photo, do you really think that they would have added a streaking bullet too low? Finally, what was it that killed one man and injured two others? Photoshop? Fake blood capsules? The amount of people who claim that this is a conspiracy is shocking, considering how much the left in general decries anyone who opposes their narratives as conspiracy theorists...
@@Joseph-xt2qgthe entire bullet in its casing is about that long. Only the projectile comes out of the barrel. The projectile is only a hair over 16 mm long.
@@Joseph-xt2qgthe entire bullet in its casing is about that long. Only the projectile comes out of the barrel. The projectile is only a hair over 16 mm long.
Bullets dont deflect in straight lines and the direction of the so called "bullet" is a lot lower than the location of the claims wound. If its real, it really looks more like jet contrails in a distance.
No! I don't think so instead Maybe we need to ask ourselves if he's knew the plot ahead of time to adjust the camera to be able capture high speed bullet 😮
He will get a Pulitzer Prize, like the one who took a picture of Oswald just after he was shot. He did not know in advanced. The odds of capturing an image of a bullet, or even a fragment, even with a shutter speed of 1/4,000 of second, are too small without a lot of luck, even with fore knowledge.
Just a reminder that this guy almost never goes to a rally and he happens to be at this one shooting at 1/8000 frames a second snapping multiple photos at the exact moment the bullets were fired. Cnn also never televise these rallys and this was the first one they did.....
