PIE & PROTO-INDO-IRANIAN 

What proto Indo-Iranian(Aryan) developed: 1. Aspect Different from proto Germanic, Proto-indo iranian keep PIE 3 aspect develop the forth aspect "Future aspect" derived from the desiderable verb. Avestan has the inchoative aspect. 2. Passive and Middle voice In the present aspect, the Aryan language developed the passive voice derived from the intransive verb, also the developed the middle voice in the perfect aspect. 3. Keep the derivational verb Difference from other indo-european languiage, the Aryan language keep the causative, desiderative and intenseive. Vedic sanskrit made the form of aorist and future for these verb. Conclusion, this language compared from the proto-germanic, keep the archic form and preserve more archaic word and developed the grammar.

As a Kurdish speaker, I understood many words

This proto language sure loves the [a] sound

I hope you do Proto-Armenian soon, I love this series so far! 🤩

Pamiri Aryan here! Waited for this one because that's how my ancestors apparently spoke

Amazing how one can already hear the salient characteristics of Hindustani languages! Good job pronouncing it!

Love the old language videos.

Can you do Avestan and Vedic Sanskrit!

as an austrian, i understood both of them perfectly. this is because i speak english & i read the english subtitles.

the PII reconstruction shown here is more close to actual PIE than your PIE reconstruction.

Proto-Indo-Iranian has more open vowels as a striking feature. Especially more /a/ phonemes. This is what is pretty prominent in Sanskrit, too. The "chatwari" of Proto-Indo-Iranian is very interesting - exactly like in Sanskrit.

Will there be Proto Iranian or/and Proto Indo Aryan too

The proto indo iranian numbers are more similar to slavic numbers than the european ones

Balochi (Balochistan) language is also an iranian language, That is more simler to kurdish, Pashtu and Persian.

nice video there is an error there are places where we will have H in proto indo Iranian and aspirates in proto indo European

As much as they are related via their closely related vocabulary, Proto-Indo-European still has some extreme differences from Proto-Indo-Iranian, especially in terms of sharp phonetic differences. If you time-travelled, and got a Proto-Indo-European speaker to converse with a Proto-Iranian speaker, there would still be misunderstandings as the Proto-Indo-Euro speaker would be confused by the sound changes which have occured by the time Proto-Iranian languages fully took root. I mean, there would still probably be some mutual intelligibility between the two, but they would both have had to speak slowly and clearly with each other, and give each other phonetic-change pointers and time to think a bit in between sentences, and only then would they be able to have a smooth conversation. Otherwise, the PIE native speaker from 3000 B.C, if he/she time travelled to 2200 B.C Iran (800 years later), there would be communication problems even if some words seem familiar to the other. It would be like an Old Aenglisc Anglo-Saxon speaker from the 6th century CE hearing a Proto-Germanic speaker from the 1st century, relatable, but still different somewhat.

A language always keeps evolving and goes away from its original form while keeping the basic skeleton. As someone who speaks 3 Indo-iranian and 1 Indo-european languages, I am able to understand both the proto forms but maybe i will not be able to understand evolved forms of them like the germen from endo-europian family. I can speak Hindustani(Hindi-Urdu),Marathi,Kokani and off course English. i studied sanskrit for 4 years when i was in high school. I wont claim to understand Sanskrit completely since its a very rich language but i am familiar with the basics.

I suggest comparison PIE and Proto-Balto-Slavic. The earliest form of baltic and slavic languages

E became A

Please make Proto Balto Slavic and Proto Indo Iranian

I can't wait to learn these languages.

Fun fact:- They both are reconstructed languages. This is the most obvious thing ik.

Very cool!, First comment!

I’m hearing retroflexed consonants in Indo-Iranian, but I think this is a mistake. I believe the retroflexed consonants became a feature of Indo-Aryan because of contact with indigenous aboriginal languages in the Gangetic Plains. Avestan does not have this feature and it should according to this video since it is a scion of Indo Iranian

🇮🇷❤️🇵🇰❤️🇮🇳

Strange. In PII the word for wool is ur?na. This is similar to the urdu word oon. But the persian word for wool is pasham.

What is mean the proto?

This languages are dialects of a one language. They are intellegible

Both sound similar as root for both is same. But, Vedic sanskrit is a completely different language abs has no relationship with these languages.

We are one strong people, the strongest of the world💪💪💪

dwoh and dwaH are so similar to Austronesian's duwa.

why does Proto-Indo-Iranian sound like Latin?

Why does it sound so similar to Sanskrit😭

Javanese Ekå Dwi Tri Catůr Påncå Sat Saptå Asthå Nåwå > Nawa ? Dåså

Proto-Indo-Iranian has SUS symbol 💀

As an iranian i say The whole IE hypothesis is a hoax, it's only indian and iranian languages which are related, slavic, celtic and germanic hellenic are a language family by themselves each alone.

Love from India Bengal 🟧⬜☘️