Plato referred to the world of ideas.A metaphysical world where perfection exists. (Perfect ideas,perfect shapes etc) This perception of the supernatural was argued by Aristotle. That's why in the famous painting where the two philosophers walk in to the academy,Plato points up to the sky and Aristotle place his hand horizontally to the ground.
I think this video doesn't really grasp Plato's concept. Plato thought that Forms were real things... actually residing somewhere beyond our world. And everything in this world of ours is just a faint emanation of those Forms. And there is even the Form of the Good, where all these Forms emanate from - the closest thing Plato has to a God. Plato's Forms were almost mystical entities. I understand that this video tries to be practical, but it really removes a lot of weight from the concept.
I totally agree with you La Serpiente! I am thinking of making a video on my channel Elevated & Meaningful where I discuss the spiritual dimension of Plato's Forms. I don't like that this has been left out. Maybe I will make a video out of our discussion together because I would still like to enhance my understanding of what Plato was trying to get at actually. What do you think?
Do you know what is the true practical application of the forms? What types of forms are there? I mean, is there a form of a rock? Or a Bed? Or forms of the compositions of each of these, and are there forms of non physical things? Like love or speed? How do we classify the forms and of what use is this for us?
Ricard De Virgo good question. There are schools of thought such as Plato's Forms that presupposes if there is a thing that exists in this world, let's call it beauty, then there is the "IDEAL" beauty that exists which is reality because it doesn't die. The beauty we know of in this world is but a reflection of the "IDEAL" beauty, that if it wasn't for the "IDEAL" true beauty, then we would never would have come to know of beauty in the first place. So this is what I understand. As for your question of practical application, to be quite frank, the practical application is but a reflection of the true reality. Things in this world allude to the existence of a world that doesn't pass away and die. We know of beauty as something that dies, decays, etc but the reality of beauty doesn't. So the practical application would always fall short in describing the reality of anything that is of the "Forms" according to my understanding. Does this make sense?
Elevated & Meaningful Yes!! It does!! The forms are the archetypes of all that exists. They are non physical, eternal and perfect. Not bound to time and space, and only comprehensible by the intellect. The thing is that I want t understand the practical application of platonism to my everyday life. For example, I'm a big fan of the stoics... I basically read all of them: Musonius Rufus, Seneca, Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius. The aim of life for the stoics is the happy life, by understanding that only virtue is good, only vice is bad and everything else is indifferent. From here they developed a very big system in how to carry on with life with tranquility. But... My personality goes more with things I can grasp with my intellect, not just psychological techniques. That is why I was interested in platonism. For example, a platonist, in order to obtain a happy and tranquil life: Ataraxia and Apatheia, what would they do? I read that the union with the supreme Good, or the form of the good is the only way to be happy. But how to I obtain it? How do I have to see the world in order to find tranquility? Because many talk about the theory of forms, but not of how to use the forms to obtain absolute joy.
youre right. but minus the crazy mystical metaphysics his teachings become practical. if anyone wants to appreciate the metaphysics they can go read his teachings.
Wow, so Plato is asserting that ideas are as real as we are and that we can abandon or rebuild beliefs that we no longer feel fit the ideal. This is a powerful tool to understanding our minds and guiding us towards truth and understanding in life.
I always have seen form as the goal. This thing that you strive to be, even if it is not possible in your life time. To work for anything that is not your goal is counter productive. To use every moment to push towards your goal, regardless of your personal advantage, is ideal. Having the courage to remove the part of your old goal that does not serve your ideal end, is progress. The end is now clearer in sight, and you have further perfected the goal. With the misconception behind you, the ideal is more real. With a clearer form you more competently complete. This philosophy is stated before Plato, but I love the way he put it.
+Ross Brannigan Skepticism is not pessimism and vice versa. Schopenhauer and the Buddha were pre-eminent pessimists but had clear views on human nature (as well as metaphysics for the latter).
+Hides inMud There's no fear at all. I posted this quote because I think it maybe comes from Plato's philosophy. Perfection or form is just (and can only be) in our minds, we can never reach it phisically. We have the idea or form of a perfect sphere for instance but we can never make it, but that should not make us stop trying and getting as close as possible :)
+Hides inMud There's no fear at all. I posted this quote because I think it maybe comes from Plato's philosophy. Perfection or form is just (and can only be) in our minds, we can never reach it phisically. We have the idea or form of a perfect sphere for instance but we can never make it, but that should not make us stop trying and getting as close as possible :)
Nobody has ever seen a perfect circle or a perfectly straight line in nature. And once Euclid et al. began to think about this non-physical ealm of perfect forms and their relationships, abstract thinking (& mathematics) began to take-off. Plato is applying the same, newly-discovered, strategy. In school, one of the sillier ways to talk about Plato is to say that he "believed in the existence of ideal forms." However if students write this in their notebooks and remember that "Plato believed . . ." they add these Greek philosophers to a long list of people in history what had "beliefs." Plato was reporting an exciting "if . . .then" discovery about thinking that (powerfully) always worked. Good job, School of Life: this improves the standard sound bite history lectures.
It wasn't really mentioned in this video but I feel a very important part about Plato's forms is that he thought we were born with them. And in that sense you really come to regard them less as our own mental things we are striving towards, but rather things that exist in their own right that we have some idea of.
Exactly. This video reduced the forms to some kind of set of ideals we hold in our mind and then impress upon the world. Somehow the author (I'm pretty sure it Alain de Botton so no suprises there -the man really is clueless) has managed to reduce the Platonic forms to what sounds a bit like Kantianism🤦♂🤦♂🤦♂
+Paul Hill: That's right. There are different kinds of Forms: physical . . . emotional . . . intellectual . . . and so on. By over-emphasizing intellectual Forms, this video makes it too easy for people to think that all Forms are mental abstractions.
Since I started watching your videos a couple of mounths back now, you have been leading myself to have the belief that forms/teplates/other words are needed, but until now I couldn't really name it, and now a day or two since your upload and I can't stop thinking about the 'forms' Great work!
It is a very wise advice from you to say that we all need to have as many forms in mind as we possibly can! I think for this, the character trait we need the most is " curiosity". Because if we want to know, the forms are everywhere. Take any subject from this lesson: Friendship. You can begin searching from 2300 years ago. Aristoteles has a whole chapter about how a friendship should be in his Nicomachean Ethics. You can start from there, and then you have the entire history of world literature and philosophy, arts and music ( so many wonderful songs about friendship) that you can apply to! So every beautiful story, every great song or movie, every painting or poem on the subject can make that form "clearer" to you. You can create your own template of the "ideal friendship" as a result of this beautiful searching adventure. We must also look around a lot, to find the admirable sides of people we come across with. There is nothing wrong with having "role models". They are like "living forms" I would say. Of course you must learn NOT to expect too much from them, since they are also only human beings. But it is a very noble thing to do, to look for the "virtues" in wiser people and to try to integrate those virtues into our lives. For example I have this friend from Ethiopia. She used to work in an internet-cafe 12 hours a day seven days a week, but she was such an incredibly patient and kind person. I have never seen her angry despite all the stress she was having with all sorts of people on that place. People get mad if something on their computer doesn't work, or if the connection is slow or if they can't print this or that...My friend would solve any problem, but she would always keep calm and take her time, while at the same time joking with those who were complaining, but always in a very friendly and warm hearted way. So she is definitely one of my role models when it comes to imagining" a form of kindness and resilience". So as I am saying, if we are curious enough and have our eyes open, it is not a big deal to fill our heads with forms and templates and ideals, which is a much more exciting and enthusiastic way of living. The difficulty is to keep them "always" in mind and have the perseverance in wanting to live by them. But this is the only way worth living. By the way, for all friends who want to apply philosophy for this and don't know where to begin with, I highly recommend Alain de Botton's excellent book " The Consolations of Philosophy". ( He is the founder of this channel). You can also watch the documentaries he made about the six philosophers we encounter in that book: Socrates, Nietzsche, Montaigne, Seneca, Epicurus, Schopenhauer. They are all on youtube! Thank you for this wonderful lesson as always!
+Lua Veli Thank you Lua Veli, I read your comments and i think it is really wonderful. Furthermore, I thank you for all the names that you recommended because i am a new learner in philosophy :). Thank you Lua Veli!
+Bimo Antonio Hello there Bimo! Thanks a lot for reading and for your lovely message. It is wonderful that you are such a curious person. You know, I once wrote a little list for another friend who was asking for websites, sources etc. to learn intersting staff, so I thought I will just copy-paste it for you . I hope you find it useful. I send you my best wishes too. So here is the list: 1. The founder of this channel Alain de Botton has another youtube channel, where you can find his documentaries. All of them have a life changing quality. 2. Wisecrack and " In a Nutshell"are good too. 3. I recommend you three great websites you could subscribe: -The Book of Life ( then brain of this channel) -Open Culture ( there you really have everything! From free E-Books , to online classes from Top Universities. On any subject you want.) -Brain Pickings ( Maria Popova's incredible blog. That place is a gold mine. ) For art check this one: -Art as Therapy ( wonderful website launched by Alain and John Armstrong) 4. And here are three podcasts where you can learn a lot: -Radiolab - The 7th Avenue Project - On Being with Krista Tippett
Thank you so much for the recommendation. I will make sure that i check it out. Thank you so much for sharing your sources with me, you have no idea how grateful i am to see this :) I hope i can repay you someday, If i may i would like to have a conversations with you in the journey of pursuing my knowledge. In the meantime i will consume some wisdom for my curious mind:)
I heard from a Philosophy prof that Plato's idea of ‘forms’ was more than a thought-experiment, and that Plato really believed they existed out there somewhere.
Understanding Plato's idea of forms is actually useful if you're into computer programming, you need to be able to understand things on an abstract level and break them down into their most fundamental pieces. For instance, a car has fundamental properties like wheels, an engine, seats, and so on, but your specific car may have red paint and a V8 engine with a dent on the fender. Knowing this you can program a template class Car and use that to derive any form of a car you wish.
The reason or the very notion why people lean towards a realization of being content with the way things are (being content in a manner which is progressive yet not so dependent on the goal of the ideal state), is because the weight of letdowns or failure from that ideal state is crushing. I think your video on Wisdom will be supportive to my argument
To ppl learning Plato: This is just one way of understanding Plato's Forms. In this vid they argue that Plato's Forms (which is his metaphysical system) show us pure, formal concepts of things. The Forms are a lot more than that, but this is one important feature !
this is not what i understood from a philosophy book about Plato.. i thought he is saying that anything we see there is the better version of it in the world of forms. he says that we feel there is a better version of anything because we have been in the world of forms. our soul Plato says. he says its an innate. and here where Aristotle disagrees with him. im really confused i need help from a philosopher
Hey Mansour! I have some ideas about what Plato was thinking maybe we can have a conversation and see where it leads us both! I am still learning about such themes that I am interested in a lot! What do you say?
Catherine Murphy You can't perfect what's in your head because it's already perfect. I think plato is trying to tell us not to worry ourselves with worldly things because they will never be perfect; they are a mere imperfect reflection of the forms. So when you work your ass off trying to make a table but it instead ends up looking like a chair, don't stress yourself because it was never meant to be perfect.
" i despise perfection , it is the doom which marks the end of betterment, evolution, change, challenge, and everything that we hate and love . but , absolutely would love to define ourselves with . what is there to live for in a perfect world . perfection is what we should all work towards , hopping that we never attain it . " the perfect world is deeply grim & disturbingly dark . it is something that i would never want to attain. But , something that i would always love to work towards .☺
I am a teacher of mathematics and philosophy. when I teach, I use quotations from the great philosophers (Plato, Aristotle, Lucretius, Marcus Aurelius, Thomas Aquinas, Rambam, ETC.) Most of my students hate when I use Plato for my arguments, because “His ideas are not for the modern world”. I feel that us philosophers need to sugarcoat ideas; So that no one will be offended by it. Yet Plato has an answer for this. Every human is born within the cave, seeing illusions of things. Yet some will escape, and they would share their ideas to all. People will not understand, but it’s what it is. This is the job of philosophers.
Viewing these philosophy videos, I came to realize, Philosophy and classical music have something in coming: Everything is awesome... They have the same natural frequency...
I think you have the form of making incredible youtube videos. Fantastic work thank you for this video. One of the best youtube videos I have ever seen.
I find it very interesting that this channel does not go into Plato's actual philosophy on the forms but sticks to the Atheist abstraction of Plato's philosophy on it. They refuse to include the fact that Plato actually saw this world as an illusion and that the forms are the true reality. He believed that these forms do actually exist in a spiritual universe. But, you would never know that because The School of Life willfully denies facts to make Plato sound more useful to the Atheist agenda.
John you raise an interesting point! I have notice this similar language used in my classes. I am an undergraduate Philosopher at UC Davis here in California. I am also noticing that the language straight away avoids spiritual concepts as you say in your comment above. I too am most attracted to Plato's concept of the forms with regards to the spiritual reality. Plato was a genius for his time. Plato's explanation of the forms has opened my eyes to what is possible even though there may not be sufficient evidence or ways to describe whatever we seek. I think that most of reality is indescribable but for some reason, despite its undescribablity, humanity, nevertheless, is able to function and progress. This is a way to look at the world, that we don't need to have evidence for everything otherwise life would be quite miserable and boring, to say the least. I hope to use this idea of Plato's forms and add the spiritual dimension to it.
Most western religions sprang up because of Platonic thought, including Christianity. C.S. Lewis, a 20th century Christian writer considered himself a neo-Platonist. Yet, a thousand years before, Eastern Orthodoxy used Platonism to flesh out their theology and clear up "confusion".
Elevated & Meaningful he's not wrong though. Most Christian philosophers have a deep love for plato and attribute this form world as being an attribute of God by including an intellect to the world of ideals. Augustine, Aquinas, C.S. Lewis, Chesterton all use much of plato
Elevated & Meaningful Fact is, you're thousands of years late to this game. Some have referred to Christianity as pop-Platonism. References? Here's a starting point: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoplatonism_and_Christianity In addition, the New Testament, CS Lewis (he called himself a platonist in his writings), John Davidson - The Gospel of Jesus (which is a thorough overview of Gnostic theology), Bertrand Russell - history of western philosophy (for the broad strokes), Alvar Ellegard - Jesus: 100 BC (which has great discussion on the syncretism of hellenistic, jewish worldviews to create gnosticism and christianity). Also, google for a bunch of articles echoing points like this based upon centuries of research and common academic knowledge. I mean, seriously, WTF are they teaching you at UC Davis? I don't even have a philosophy degree. I just read.
Did you know that Plato talked about a place called "the world of ideas" (ὁ κόσμος τῶν ἰδεῶν) where the perfect "forms" of everything existed and where reason and science originated from? The word idea is directly from Greek ἰδέα, and the word ideal means he/she/it that is in the world of ideas. Fascinating.
As a software developer, I would like to say that Plato is right , the day when we use Forms in programming (aka Classes & Objects) everything becomes easier & more far better than before .
Thank you for the video, it gives Plato's ideas very accurately in a nutshell (along with the allegory of cave). I'd also love to see you guys' interpretation of Plotinus and his works!
i've been teaching philosophy for some years now and i've never seen such a simple and concrete way to present the concept of form... thank you. would you be nice also if you do a video on the reasons that explain why some philosophers criticize this concept and feel the need to define themselve against plato
+pierrot monami: Then you obviously know almost nothing about Plato. This video is a very mediocre attempt at conveying an understanding of the Forms . . .
+Liandra Bassiane i would like to be able to express them with the same simplicity as they do on art of life, but i am not able to do it for now. i was thinking about philosophers like Nietzsche and Deleuze, who think that the way Plato defined forms necessarily brings him to the condemnation of the "sensible world', the world 'of life'... Plato's philosophy would be a "discontented" philosophy
Plato's Essentialism (Philosophy of Forms) is contradictory to modern Existentialist philosophers because Plato claims the true forms are unchangeable, sacred and infinite.Thus the true human form would be something that is eternal and unchangeable.Existentialists like Sartre,Kirkegaard,Camus... hate the idea of something stable and unaltered that has no room for development
Great video but I am confused. What makes something ideal is very subjective so if you don't really know what really is the ideal, how do you aim for the form?
+Shuheng Zhang: The answer to such a general question is itself general: you discover the Forms by exploring your experience of Reality . . . since all of Reality is en-Formed by the Forms.
holly, this channel is amazing, even i can find captions on my language to understand everithing perfectly, thanks. btw plato was really genious , he makes me think about lot of stuff
Dear Alain de Bottonm ,i am fan of your work and voice .I Have request for you please have a look into Thiruvalluvar a famous Tamil poet and philosopher .He is best known for Thirukkuṛaḷ, a collection of couplets on ethics, political and economical matters, and love. The text is considered as one of the finest works of the Tamil literature
Knowledge - opinion Ideal - actual Form - appearance There's is always a "best" that's need to be achieve, Plato described Socrates as a knowledge person and others have opinions.
may I request a video about a topic? I often think to myself that if I thought less, perhaps life would be easier. Though, "thinking too much." or "overthinking" is every philosophers' worst insult, every philosopher should know that in a way, it is kinda true. what do you think?
You forgot to mention how the forms were "universal" and (plato believed) that everyone had the same understanding of a form (he was against relativism).
Well, this ignores some of the more important problems with Plato's Forms, for instance that they are not really supposed to have their basis in human purposes or to be found with the help of experience: "Instead of the purpose of the tool, [Plato] talks of the Form or εἶδος of the tool; and this Form is something which we are supposed to apprehend telepathically, without any means of doing so. We are explicitly forbidden to learn from experience what form a shuttle should take: 'If his shuttle breaks as he is making it, will he in making another look to the broken one, or to that Form to which he also looked in making the broken one? To the Form, I think' (389A)." - Robinson, R. 1956. A criticism of Plato's Cratylus
+Mrcharrio There is no right or wrong. One may think the ideal mother would be tough and hard working while another may think the ideal mother to be kind and forgiving. Either way they should strive to be the best mother in there mind.
Thanks School of Life, this is a great video. I felt inspired because I have always been in conflict with having a "form" . As you mentioned we should look at the philosophy and plato know what the form for friendships, marriages etc.. I am interested in where can we find these forms ?
+Liandra Bassiane: We "get" the Forms by exploring, reflecting on, and explicitly recognizing different levels of our experience . . . since all of Reality and our experience of it is implicitly en-Formed by them. There are physical Forms . . . intellectual Forms (overly emphasized in this video) . . . emotional Forms . . . and so on. Each of these can be "touched" or "tasted" both implicitly (like "something" that you recognize as a taste in a cake) . . . and explicitly (like recognizing that the "something" is "chocolate").
+Liandra Bassiane Hi there Liandra! I would highly recommend you the book " The Consolations of Philosophy", it is written by Alain de Botton, the founder of this channel. If you search on youtube for " Status Anxiety", you will find his other youtube channel, where you can find documentaries about all six philosophers he wrote about in that book. You can also subscribe to the website " The Book of Life" which is the brain of this channel. The articles there give you guidance on anything you can imagine! Best wishes!
+The School of Life ; please bring out a video about Socrates; there's not much written about him, but in Plato's The Apology we see a quite distinct philosophy and approach. I know you did mention the Socratic method in The Allegory of the Cave, but come on, there's much more to say about the method.
It seems like this video is the basis of this entire channel, you guys really took this idea to heart. And it produced some very interesting videos, like The Perfect Country and Better Porn. I might not always agree with the ideas themselves, but it always makes me look at the issue from a completely new angle.
You should also have mentioned that Plato argues that every element in our life is and can only be a copy of those forms, those perfect ideas that we look to. The forms belong to the hyperuranion, while their copies belong to our physical world. He thus accepted the intrinsic imperfection of human nature, which invariably reflects in our societies.