Which Pixar film would you like my hot take on next? The Good Dinosaur / jennynicholson The Good Dinosaur / jennyenicholson The Good Dinosaur / spider_jewel The Good Dinosaur / spiderjewel The Good Dinosaur / jennynicholsonvids
I don’t know why, but I was always under the impression that kids love was the reason they were alive, in like a magic pixie dust way so as toys stop getting played with they die naturally and so being a lost toy means that you accept your mortality and that you know you’re going to die without a child’s love.
@@marshalinehamismother Ah, which is why they seek out children at parties or other places where random extra toys won't be thought of as odd. That's their equivalent of eating. Given how long Jesse languished, though, if that is the case it takes a long time.
@@professorhaystacks6606 Also the Villain of the second film was a collectable in a box and had never been played with; so I Guess the theory falls apart there.
Mario Angel Medina maybe! And that would solve the Jesse problem. But it could also be that the prospector was keeping her alive? That way if you’re an adult and keep your toys around and you still love them they’re still alive even if you don’t play with them all the time?
Imagine being the porg behind jenny and hearing all this and having to pretend your just a toy while slowly screaming inside about how you'll never be happy
Yikes. Scary. Love it. Awesome adaptation of an amazing reference. Who would Benny be? Good question. Hell, who would any of them be? I must ponder this.
Imagine Bonnie later finding out Woody is missing, being upset about it enough that the parents consider trying to get her a new one, googling Woody, and finding out their child just lost a Toy that could have payed off their mortgage. Imagine any adult in Bonnie's life finding out before this and Woody spending a good decade or two in a safety deposit box.
The way that happened to me almost the same way... Because my Woody toy was original from the 90s and was super detailed from back then, and you can only find them crazy expensive 🥴🥴🥴
I'll be pissed if toy story 5 isn't inexplicably bearded woody and bo as mad max and furiosa wandering around a post apocalyptic wasteland where only toys have survived
I was raised Christian and personally, every moment I spent at church was indeed pervaded by the constant anxiety that God would replace me with a cool spaceman.
@@theoneandonlymichaelmccormick Sadly, it's very possible that you weren't told the actual Good News. Let me break it down: 1. You're not really being threatened as much as alerted. It's like saying that a Tornado Siren is "threatening" you with a tornado. The natural, unavoidable consequence of not acknowledging or believing in the literal Creator and Sustainer of all things, including you, is eternal death because sin separates us from God like oil and water and since God is Life that separation is death. Since you have an "eternal spirit" that cannot literally end, disappear, and be "no more," that suffering just goes on and on and on without end. No one is making you suffer the same way that no one forces you to be ripped apart in the tornado - it's just the natural consequence of not getting out of its way. 2. That "omnimpotent force" loves you so much that He literally took on the form of a human being, lived up to that "arbitrary standard" life you and I couldn't live up to, and then died the death you and I deserved. He is offering to give you the eternal reward he earned in exchange for your sin and wrongdoing. He drinks your poison and gives you his elixir of life! He's not looking down in judgement yelling at you to, "get your life right," but rather knocking at the door of your heart asking for entry. If you let Him inside through faith and repentance in Jesus, He will literally transform you from an object of wrath into a beloved child of God. No effort required. If you are just the least bit curious, I highly recommend starting with the Book of John. It's not very long - and it's the perfect place to begin your encounter with the God who loves you. www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+1&version=NLT
just know that if or when your god abandons you there's a whole slew of norse gods to play with, they don't know cool spacemen are a thing yet so don't tell them anything!
ghaskjdfsdf I was just watching your intense interview with that gamer therapist guy right before this and I was not ready to see you just comment on a random Jenny Nicholson video this is so surreal
there there was me, who was convinced all plushies were sentient and would yell at other kids if they were too rough with the stuffed animals because they were hurting them. i still at 23 feel kinda bad when i find one of my many stuffed animals face down on the floor.
I don’t know why, but I was always under the impression that kids love was the reason they were alive, in like a magic pixie dust way so as toys stop getting played with they die naturally and so being a lost toy means that you accept your mortality and that you know you’re going to die without a child’s love.
@@tinaj3279 I was honestly annoyed at the replies and was going to call them out for being pedantic but then was like, "Oh no my sincere reply turned into a bit and now I'm the asshole" So...I'm really glad you enjoyed it lol
I think it seems in the movies that the toys want to be loved specifically by children and played with, being owned by an adult, even one who loves them, might not be satisfying to them.
Most religions conceive of deities as though they're emotional children. The Abrahamic deity being a terrific example. Throws massive temper tantrums over the pettiest bullsh*t. Conceives of people as all bad, deserving infinite torture, or all good, with no grey area of people who are mostly good, but sometimes do bad things, or mostly bad, but sometimes do good things.
@@danielsilvers2896 Hey! There is no universal interpretation of gd in all three abrahamic religions and the Christian gd is fundamentally different from the interpretation by the other two.
this is the way it's been since 1. it's simultaneously amusing and emotionally exhausting to delve into. and you still come out of it with no more answers than when you began and also you're staring at the dolls & action figures in your house suspiciously, wondering if they saw all that.
@@BintonGamingwell if you wanna get into it, probably something extremely similar! their purpose just has to do with adults rather than kids, so i imagine an unused sex toy probably feels just as upset as a child’s toy stuck in a closet.
I was under the impression that children making memories with a toy is what gives them sentience. Also because Bonnie and Andy wrote their names on their toys shoes lol.
@@jorgeamadosoriaramirez8953 Maybe I've just been watching too much Persona, but it definitely feels like toys have something of a collective unconscious element to them. Buzz (and Woody before him) has roughly the same personality as his fictional counterpart from popular media (which would thus have become part of the collective unconscious thanks to its popularity) prior to being given individual attention from Andy and from the other toys, which allowed him to develop an individual identity that differs from the original. Forky, on the other hand, was created purely from Bonnie's individual imagination, and is thus much less thoroughly formed than Buzz or any of the commercially manufactured toys, since he doesn't have the weight of the collective unconscious backing him up. ...actually, maybe Forky _does_ draw from the collective unconscious' perception of who he should be after all; the majority of people would see a used spork as disposable trash, so thus Forky's basic instincts are to be thrown away as trash. As he gets attention from Bonnie and from other toys, however, he develops into more of his own individual, and is able to break free from the collective unconscious' idea of him.
Right? Forky forces us to contemplate what makes a toy to begin with? Is it because a child once played with them? Are toys inanimate before being played with?
@@ziggystardog I think this is just a case of bad writing, not thinking through implications and the filmmakers getting lost so far up their meta-physical backsides. It's a movie. Relax.
Toy story: "your parents won't replace you" Toy story 2: "your parents will always love you" Toy story 3 : "but one day you have to move on" Toy story 4: "and find your own porpose in life" Kingdom hearts 3: "or you could let some Japanese kid fix all your problems for you... That works too I guess"
Just imagine little toys gathering around their sick kid, worried and upset. Then finding out years later about lead poisoning, and not even trying to hide while all of the toys were called back to be destroyed, accepting their death.
as a disabled person i totally read the voice box part as an allegory for loving all of yourself, even the ""broken"" parts i found it sooo lame that fixing her "disability" is what got her love from some random kid
Yeah it would have been cool if she found a teenager who thought her broken voice box was interesting and symbolized finding the people who love you the way you are instead of wanting you to change to be good enough for them (which wasn’t even her problem to begin with since the girl didn’t like her after fixing her voice box)
@@freddiesimmons1394 True, my ppms makes dating me a drag. I don't like comparing the shallow struggles of some broken object in a kids movie to the complexities of being disabled. I get they're supposed to teach lessons but that's a little too out of range for media that's half "be nice to everyone" half "X is bad" cut into easily consumed, black and white bites.
Imagine Buzz and Woody being split up and living years, several kids worth of lives apart only to meet randomly when their current owners visit a Pizza Planet.
I agree with everything you've said here but I'm surprised you made a 20 minute rant about the unintended implications of mortality and consciousness in the Toy Story Universe without mentioning TS4's biggest contribution to that narrative: Forky. We know that there's a possibility that toys may never die but what about the approach from the other side? When does a toy become alive? In Toy Story 1-3, we're lead to believe that a toy becomes alive when it is explicitly that: a toy. (Tortilla Potato Head in TS3 not included. If we think about the constraints of Potato Head's consciousness for more than a couple seconds it leads into too many questions. If he's still alive without his potato, where is he consciousness stored? Do toys even have a physical representation of consciousness? Is he the hive mind of a collection of parts? But I digress.) Now in Toy Story 4, it throws all that we know out the window. Forky was an already used spork found in the trash give eyes and limbs, does this mean anything personified suddenly becomes a toy? Is the paper plate I drew a face on in ketchup doomed to live its existence in misery as a consciousness trapped in the dump? Does this mean there are thousands, if not millions, of suffering objects accidentally given souls doomed to live out their existence in a trash heap never seeing the light of day again? The implications of the Toy Story Universe are horrifying.
But Forky was _happy and cozy_ in the trash. _He liked_ being in a garbage can, surrounded by other discarded refuse, and would probably _enjoy_ being buried in a dump. Your ketchup-faced plate will probably be fine.
There's a weird theory out there that the toys are basically inhabited by Supernatural parasites that feed off of the feelings of love given to them by kids and that's why they're so afraid of being abandoned. But yeah, Forky is one of those things that says "let's take everything we know about the established cannon in previous movies and toss it out the window. Also, Forky liked being in the trash and that suggests that, as a spork, he was already conscious.
@@blobbertmcblob4888 It suggests less that he was conscious as a spork, and more that the gift of consciousness is inherently a curse to him as he knew from the moment he was born he wasn't supposed to exist. It's like if you could teach an octopus about suffering and morals and how to feel parental connection; the entire genus would have a mental breakdown.
Thank you for the much needed Mr Shark representation in the background, Jenny. The worst thing the team at Pixar have ever done is remove him from the series after his standout performance in the first film
I think with Toy Story 2 the point was less “let’s worry about all the sad things later because we have a lot of time” and more so “let’s begin the process of acceptance by stopping the worry and be grateful for the time we have now”
I always thought of it more as a "journey vs destination" theme, like "this thing right now probably won't last (all things are transitory), but that doesn't matter. Something not being permanent doesn't make it less valuable, and when it's over, that time you spent will still have meant something."
I usually loathe the “fantastical elements were never real” kind of theories in children’s material. But I think picturing that these really were stories that Andy and Bonnie made up about their fuzz and plastic pals really is the most satisfying answer. I like to think the ever imaginative Andy had fun making up fantastical scenarios for why his toys were lost or what they were doing while he was off at summer camp. And when he chose to finally give them away, being a teenager with a little more bite to his storytelling but still a lot of sentimentality, he imagined them off on one last hoorah. When he gave them to Bonnie, he taught her all of their personalities, so they remained intact throughout the stories she sent them on. Maybe Andy’s sister told her he used to have a Bo Peep lamp and would play her as Woody’s love interest, so Bonnie came up with a big reunion story for them... which covered up the reality she’d actually lost Woody while her family was on vacation. Maybe that’s not so satisfying to some viewers, but, anymore, it’s what I think was really going on.
that's a really sweet interpretation. im kind of blown away this is the first i heard of this type of angle. also, a cool extension to this is Andy is the sort of fictional "writer/director" of the first 3 toy stories (kind of mirroring his playtimes with them), which explains how toy story 4, which is "written & directed" by Bonnie, toys with the worldbuilding of it all and kind of sticks out among the series as having slightly different logics.
Oh my god i've never heard this theory, but i really kind of like it! At least for me it wraps up a thing that bugged me about the ending of Toy Story 2 as a kid which was 'wait, where does Andy's mom think these new toys came from? He audibly thanks her for them, so it's not like he's hiding them from her'. Under this theory, she probably *could have* just gotten them for him!
Toy Story is legitimately one of the most bizarre franchises I've ever seen. They could have, so easily, kept their stories nice and fluffy but they keep trying to poke and prod at these deeper existential ideas and themes. So the movie keeps bringing up these super awkward and uncomfortable ideas and weirdly tries to marry them to the lighthearted tone they're going for. So you get completely horrifying ideas like Forky, a sentient being birthed by a child who has to come to grips with him being alive and it's just mindboggling to see.
It’s just plain cynical and weird. This toys have one purpose in life and that’s to be a child plaything. Regardless of the kids they still get to live their purpose out with the kids , every kid HAS to grow up and it’s sad but we have to but the toys purpose in life is to be a tool for their imagination. It’s fun and awesome 👏 It don’t even have to get cyclical cuz who was asking these questions? No one , Disney so greedy. Any trash Cash grab
"Toy Story 3 is a brilliant send off to the franchise for the kids that grew up, along with Andy, on the originals." *Toy Story 4:* I'm about to end this man's whole career.
mariokarter13 So the man goes off, reconnects with the woman he loves and starts a new career. Will it be messy and hard? Sure, but life is like that so make the best of it ;-)
I don't know why he didn't just keep them in a box in his attic lol. He didn't have to give them away, he could just give them to his kid when he has one.
I’m not scared of that at all. I figure whatever people watching my life will realize that whatever replacement shoved down their throats is a lame Poochy, and then the writers will learn their lesson and put the focus back on me. I’m a classic, time tested character. The audience will never get tired of me!
I'm listening to a girl dressed like a toy talk about the themes and philosophy of mortality and reincarnation in a children's movie. ... I could do this all day.
It's almost sort of relaxing in a way. Hearing her review stuff is so calming to me, like I just can't help but keep listening. Dunno why, I just find it interesting
One of my favorite ideas from Last Action Hero. After Arnie finds out he's an action movie protagonist, there's a bit where he gets a little upset that his creators kept putting him and his family through the ringer in multiple sequels for entertainment.
My issue with the series is it's established in 2 that Woody is "an old family toy" he's from a line that came out in the 50s(they remember/confirm that in 4) yet he only ever mentions Andy as a previous kid and he never draws on any experience of being outgrown. Like depending on what years the timeline lands in, Woody was at least Andy's father's toy, possibly his grandfather's(I mean he could have been his mother's toy, Idk) but when they're being packed away in 3, he doesn't reassure the gang like "It's okay, this is how it works, this is what's gonna happen" he just let's them freak out, like he does try to calm them down but doesn't site anecdotal evidence to do so. Also if I was Andy's mom, I'd be pissed "you gave our family heirloom away!? I wouldn't sell it to a man for 50 bucks but you just gave it to a random child!!??" There was a bunch of tiny things that bugged the crap outta me in 4. Like the guy drives through a rainstorm to pick up a lamp??? Who does that? It could wait, it could definitely wait til the next day. The fact that Bo is still made of porcelain but her clothes are sudden cloth and it's like we're just suppose to accept that. The fact that they need a key to enter the cabinet but literally 30 seconds later we see a dummy leave the cabinet from the inside, does the lock only work one way? Are we just suppose to ignore that these events take place one after the other. They try to make us empathize with Chatty Cathy but she literally harvested Woody's organs and we're just suppose to be like "Yeah, help her find a kid. She just wants love" SHE STOLE A MAN'S ORGANS, she was plotting it from the moment she met him, couldn't we have made her a good guy prior to her mutilating the main character!? Who approved this!??
for some reason it took me a while to realise you were wearing costumes in these videos and I thought you just had like an eccentric personal style and I didn't question it at all until this moment.
Incidentally nobody's more cynical about those songs than Randy himself. He once pointed out that in You Got A Friend In Me he sounds like a used car salesman.
You’re right. But I really identified with that movie as a teacher. A theater teacher. I have the same kids for years until they grow up and move on. My business hinges on their attachment to me and what I teach. I love them and I’ve been trying to balance that love with knowing that they’re going to move on (and finding a healthy center for my sense of purpose). I know that’s a super specific situation to identify with these movies but hey it’s something😅
I came from a violent home. I was probably a pretty good bet to end up in the prison or the graveyard. It was a Drama Teacher who wouldn't give up on me - wouldn't accept less than my best, never stopped encouraging me. I am living a happy, successful life now, and 45 years later I am still convinced that she is why I didn't self-destruct very early. I will be grateful to her for the rest of my days. I'm glad I went back and told her so. And now I'm telling you - what you do matters. It ripples down the years. Thank you.
I moved around a lot as a child, before anyone was concretely reachable, so the idea of "at any time you can just be removed from your friends and never see them again" is sad but completely imaginable. I've forgotten so many names and faces.
That moment when a “random” person yells your name in public and in your head all you are thinking is I went to three different middle schools like I have no idea where you are from
I mean i had that same experience in a time with the iphone, but before kids really had them and yeah, hard to see my friends realizing the impermanence of relationships as they go through breakups or drift apart from childhood friends, because its hard for me to help them through something i grappled with as a child and no longer really worry about
KaijuTurtle i think you’d be a little disappointed tbh. i’d expect just a 20-second video with only the words “This movie was boring.” immediately followed by the list of patreon supporters
“Who fights for God’s attention?” Cain literally killed Abel because God thanked Abel for his sacrifice and not Cain, since Cain’s sacrifice was selfish and all he wanted was attention. So...
Yeah, that part and the "I think all this is based off this one line" made me stop watching for a minute. A one two combo of poorly thought out and wilfully ignorant.
"If the toys had actually been incinerated, would they have died, or would they have just been forced to lie for eternity as a conscious pile of ash?" SCP-2718 containment breach confirmed.
DAMMERUNG-class cognitohazard detected. Failure to close browser, delete cache, and report exposure to Mobile Task Force Psi-7 within eighteen seconds of this warning will result in summary execution by Trinitite-class memetic.
me, opening this video: ok, a review on toy story 4 accidentally clicks on a middle part of the video: "people find the idea of reincarnation comforting..."
There’s no happy endings, not here and not now. This tale is all sorrows and woes. You may dream that justice and peace win the day, but that’s not how the story goes -A Series of Unfortunate Events
Not to mention the original TV show Woody. You know, the marrionette one that the regular toy Woody is based off of? If a fork with some googly eyes glued on can become sentient, marrionettes surely count under the same umbrella as "toy." So where is OG Woody, Jesse, Bullseye and Stinky Pete?
Woody’s first owner was Andy’s dad. This is cannon, one of the creators of toy story talks about it in an interview, it just never made it into the story.
@@fortunatecookie the creator that talked about that told his friend. That creator died in a car crash. It's not cannon as Pete Doctor said in a tweet it's absolutely not true. Each creator had their own "origin" story I think, but none of it is cannon.
"And who.. fights for God's attention? Who feels anxiety that God will replace them with a cool space man?" I feel like this was the plot of Prometheus..
This ended up being a lot deeper than I was expecting. Good job Jenny, you made me contemplate my existential existence again. For several years after watching Toy Story 3 I had recurring nightmares about being a toy and getting abandoned or destroyed. The thought of spending eternity as a disembodied consciousness terrified me
Wait, why didn’t she just talk normally and fake still having a voice box? She can talk to other toys and humans can hear toys since Woody could threaten Sid back in the first movie, at least unless I’ve missed something.
I realize I’m 2 months late with this hot take but... I always though Toy Story was about change, purpose, and growing up. TS1 is about how things change and that can be scary but can also bring more family and friends and is often a blessing even if you worry about being left behind or overshadowed. TS2 is about choosing a path/purpose. You can do something/live a life that is safe and bland and stable or you can make the healthier more mature option to chose something that has risk and is finite but brings you joy and love and community. TS3 is about endings. People who grew up on Toy Story loved it because it’s about how childhood ending (where that audience was in their lives) is scary because anything could happen and not all of it will be good. Circumstances change but even though that’s hard, on the other side there is joy and purpose and it’s totally different but still has a lot of similarities to the life you loved before. TS4 is about realizing you are free to build any life you want and how that freedom is overwhelming and terrifying but ultimately what is needed to find purpose and meaning in your evolving life. It’s also about letting go of things you loved that no longer fit into what you want. A lot of people have things in their lives they hold onto because they used to love it but it doesn’t bring them that anymore. Woody leaving Bonnie and his friends is an example that you can change your purpose or how you identify yourself and it’s not a betrayal or giving up. It’s just a part of growing up. Life is dynamic and nothing lasts forever but that doesn’t have to be bad. Sorry for the novel...
@@lostjohnny197 she's said before that she wont review anything that she doesnt feel like reviewing. Might as well give up on trying to push movies on her and just enjoy the ride.
I feel like you can take much of Jenny's read but view Gabby-Gabby's ending as less aberrant/revisionist and account in Woody's relationship to Forky and you get something fairly coherent about the trade offs between altruism and seeking happiness through a more parochial lens through stages of life. As well as how directly one needs to help to help effectively I think in there essential "toyness," it's fair to assume the desire, reflected in woody's speeches about nobility, to help a child is a moral good and valid purpose for a toy. I think you can see Gabby-Gabby's "failure" through much of the film mostly as fixation on a particular child (Harmony) vs understanding that there are _other_ children she can help. Her vanity re: voice box isn't really what gets her there (though it is played as more than irrelevant), rather it is about helping a child in need (lost) vs helping a child who, per her mother, "already has enough toys" Whereas Bo-Peep in backstory did the good work of getting Molly through her fear of the dark, and then was fulfilled enough to go off on her own, live for herself Woody has to come to that realization throughout the film, and he arrives at it partially through helping Forky accept his present role in Bonnie's life, partially through his commitment to helping him reunite with her, partially in more or less willingly helping Gabby-Gabby, and then staring in the face the opportunity to stay with Bonnie and (with a push) _choosing_ to stay with Bo-Peep And then in the mid-credits Bo and Woody are spending their time helping unite other toys (the prizes) with new children. Helping many kids indirectly rather than few directly Idk. Jenny put more effort into this than I obviously - but I think there's something down this path.
The squeaky shark wearing Woody's hat is one of my favorite clips from the Toy Story franchise. I love that it was added to the background of this video!
Thank you for saying the pixar theory is nonsense. I'm glad I'm not the only one who finds it dumb. You can bend and twist anything to fit your narrative.
@@RemixedVoice I think they hide little Easter eggs from other Pixar films in newer ones, similar to A113. But I don't think that means the Creators are alluding to a deeper theory of the movies all taking place in the same universe.
I think if Jenny keeps making videos eventually she might stumble upon the meaning of life and our alien overlords will lift her away with a giant claw
The best ethos of the movies that I've read/seen... somewhere... was just that the themes of the series aged with the audience. For any given movie, if you imagine the audience is Andy's age, it makes sense as a work that resonates with themes of people that age. The first movie is about new friends and the anxieties of children, the second movie is still about the anxieties of children, but more pre-teens than young children, the third movie is about change, growing up, and the anxieties that come with being an adult. I never saw Toy Story 4, but the existential angst described in this video sounds like the existential angst of people in their late 20s, who would have been Andy's age at the beginning of the series (me being in that age group). From this view, the movies neither have nor need a consistent theme from movie to movie; themes of our anxieties and relationships change as we age.
For what it’s worth, the impermanence of everything - even friendship - feels like a central theme in all Toy Story movies. So 4 could simply be read as “how to find peace even with the impermanence of your most fundamental relationships.” And perhaps not everyone is capable of finding peace with that (gabby gabby - though I agree on your critiques of the voicebox-fixing). On the second criticism, I could imagine toys finding peace without running out to travel the world. Some major world religions center on finding peace in spite of everything being impermanent. Maybe elderly toys in the attic all just turn into Buddhists. Lol.
The toys are sentient beings, with volition and emotions and desires, and all that is rendered inconsequential the moment a powerful being comes along, demanding all their time and attention. It's a metaphor for work under capitalism.
Oh come on OP, it’s not as if even the superficial sense of purpose the toys gain via their service to a capricious entity with little respect for or understanding of their sapience and fundamental rights as feeling beings is futile, and in the end the toys will serve several masters, degrading more and more over time until their husk is discarded to rot.
*Rossiya - svyashchennaya nasha derzhava, Rossiya - lyubimaya nasha strana. Moguchaya volya, velikaya slava - Tvoio dostoyanye na vse vremena! Slav'sya, Otechestvo nashe svobodnoye, Bratskih narodov soyuz vekovoi, Predkami dannaya mudrost' narodnaya! Slav'sya, strana! My gordimsya toboi! Ot yuzhnyh morei do polyarnogo kraya Raskinulis' nashi lesa i polya. Odna ty na svete! Odna ty takaya - Khranimaya Bogom rodnaya zemlya! Shirokii prostor dlya mechty i dlya zhizni. Gryadushchiye nam otkryvayut goda. Nam silu daiot nasha vernost' Otchizne. Tak bylo, tak yest' i tak budet vsegda!*
The lesson I took from Toy Story 2 was "don't let the fear of impermanence or loss keep you from investing deeply during the time you have." Which is something I've really needed to hear at certain points in my life. (But yeah, "don't be a vampire" works too 😄)
Humans imbued life by will and by accident by having an emotional attachment, but that spell is never undone and the toys who never chose to be given far outlive that love that gave them life in their cursed mortality, only ended by the complete destruction of their shells. A Pixar Movie
Yeah, as the universe expands and we kind of get more "rules" for how the in-world magic works, the whole thing becomes gradually more ridiculous. Logical inconsistencies can be okay if they're small enough to not notice, but the more movies you add in, the more glaring they become.
You're reading TOO much into it. The movie is about TOYS that can move and talk and have thoughts and feelings of there own. Period. There's nothing more to the story. Toy Story 4 10/10
They should play into it at this point. Toy Story 4 didn't feel like an ending to me. They should just go wild and do the toy revolution. Honestly in Toy Story 4 that really seemed like the only possible conclusion to their situation
