@@this.science ohhhhh that makes sense Oh hello :3 You saw this, nice And that's smart, do that, so it isn't compressed when it's first posted I'm gonna start to do that
oh my god back when I was in like 1st grade we did a play and I was cast as a scientist who ran on stage and announced very loudly (and very lispy) that PLUTO WASNT A PLANET ANYMORE!! so yes good memories
Honestly I think Pluto getting demoted was my earliest memory I can place. I came along with my Dad taking my sister to school, and he was telling us about it because the news broke that morning.
I was the pluto in my 1st grade play, and during final rehearsals my planet crown with pluto on it was taken away to represent it not being a part of solar system anymore. I felt sad :(
See, this is why nobody liked you in elementary school. You were always trying to learn some fucking bullshit that nobody cared about. This is why when you asked Jessica if she could be your girlfriend, she laughed at your face. This is why everyone laughed at you when your pants fell down and it revealed that big ass burn scar. You are at fault for your own failures.
If you think Pluto has a poor excuse for an orbit then you should check out Sedna: its orbit is 5x more eccentric than Pluto's and it take about 11,400 years to complete it just once.
@@NikodAnimations You mean 2015Tg87 Ans the furthest object from the sun is 2014fe72 it takes about 92,000 years to orbit the sun. And is 3050Au from the sun at aphelion..
I disagree. Pluto is definitely not a planet, but that doesn't mean it's not an uninteresting body or uncool. There are a ton of incredibly interesting properties about Pluto, even if it's just a somewhat common Kuiper belt dwarf planet. Gorgeous ice formations, its atmosphere, its moons, its geology.. Charon even gets covered in red debris on its Pluto-facing side from cryovolcanoes. Honestly, every aspect of Pluto- and every body in the solar system, is absolutely fascinating. You don't need to be a planet to be cool :)
About that orbit, have you seen Sedna’s? Also, Haumea *does* have enough gravity to pull itself into a sphere, it’s just spinning so fast that it’s being stretched into that shape.
This is the best start to a channel I've ever seen, can't believe you made it to the top 0.5 percentile in just 2 months. Can't wait to see what you upload next.
what i learn from solarball: Pluto is from the Kuiper belt and the reason why pluto was out of the kuiper belt cause of neptune's gravity but pluto had a moon like their size getting them out from neptune
That message at the end is too easy, give me something harder like darkening the image a lot so I have to take it into Photoshop and brighten it, and the words are actually put through some kind of cipher, while also being converted into hex code, which is actually a hex code of binary code, which represents an audio wav file of your voice saying the message, reversed, and sped up a lot. I think that might make it harder.
haumea actually does have enough gravity to form a sphere. it just spins so unbelievably fast for a planet that its equator bulges extremely, making it look very oblate
The second rule says that it has to have enough gravity To keep its shape. So that doesn’t mean it has to be a sphere. Else earth isn’t a planet as well since it isn’t perfectly round
I love this channel so much dude. These videos are amazing, and I'm so happy you made a video about space!! Congratulations with the 100k button! You've almost hit the 300K now! :D
Pluto technically fails the first rule to since the bary center lies outside of Pluto. This means that Pluto is technically a binary system or a moon of Charon. On earth, the bary center lies inside earth and that makes it still a planet
It should be noted that the IAU's new definition of what makes a planet is pretty dumb, for example anything that orbits a different star than our sun can't be a planet. A new new definition is needed for sure. Maybe that would include Pluto, but I doubt it.
One thing you failed to mention, is that plutos discovery was through unimaginable luck. It was nowhere near large enough to produced the observed effect on neptune, and as it turns out, thanks to Voyager 2 we found out neptunes mass was 0.5% less then previously calculated, which as it turns out is just enough of a difference to explain what we thought was another object pulling on it. So not only did the planet they were searching for not exist, and as such the flawed calculations were entirely pointless, but by through some divine stroke of luck, a speck of dust happened to be in the night sky at the time, which we would name pluto.
@@memiwei Well, just for starters, Haumea DOES have enough gravity to be a sphere, it just spins really fast so it looks misshapen. Look at Saturn, it spins fast, just not as fast as Haumea. Saturn is also flattened a bit. And Pluto is like, the coolest object ever. It's objectively awesome. It literally has an ocean of LIQUID WATER underneath the ice. It is geologically active. It's moon. Charon, has a deposit of organic molecules on it, called MORDOR.
Pretty cool through, there's enough big circular rocks that we could actually land on, bit risky in an asteroid belt but hey maybe we'll mine them someday or something.
Rules don't matter? Okay then (I can't argue with you because anytime I see a person who doesn't care about rules/facts, it's impossible to change their mind)
IAU says Pluto is not a planet. It can be a planet in your heart, but it is forever classified as a dwarf planet and people will have to accept the new planet definition someday.
Also, Pluto has another neighbour in its orbit: Neptune. Even if the Kuiper Belt were to be farther away, Pluto would still be a dwarf planet because there's no way it can take on a gas giant 7880 times its mass.
