@@michaelparsons2225 you must be paid for your disinfo. Star trails around Polaris prove the stars are close and rotate above us. Stars are not visible in high altitude weather balloons.
Vid mentions pole star was used for navigation as far back as 5th century AD, but chola kings were already navigating using pole star in SE asia during 3ooBC
@@Gamer_2047_ The Northstar never moves, all stars above rotate around it In a 365 day pattern. That’s how come stars could be used for navigation. We are not moving.
You forgot to mention one thing. The ancient Greek word for bear is arkos. That's where we get the arctic from. You are in the area of the bear constellation.
Since we are hurtling through space, how come Polaris holds its precise position, given we are all moving relative to each other and at different speeds, different masses etc. One would expect that no star would occupy a position like Polaris, but should move just like everything else? Can somebody explain why Polaris always holds it position?
There are at least a couple of factors at play. One is that Polaris and the Earth are embedded in the same milky way galaxy and each is revolving around the galaxy's center roughly once every 240 million years. (We've made about 1/4 or a revolution since the mass extinction of dinosaurs!) While the two objects speeds aren't likely to be exactly the same, the distance between them is so enormous any change in the relative positions of the two objects is nearly undetectable over short time periods of time, even with enhanced astronomical instruments. For example, image viewing two airplanes traveling the same speed with each traveling directly overhead, one at 3,000 ft, the other at 30,000 ft.* That plane nearer you would appear to be moving much faster relative to you and horizon and would quickly disappear from view. The other would be visible for much longer, and appear to creep across the sky. (I've noticed this best when a plane is at cruising elevation, 30,000+ ft and the sun, near the horizon, is gleaming off it's fuselage creating a pinpoint of light in the twilight sky.) Multiple that effect by the 6 trillion miles that polaris is from earth and you get the idea; even if the relative distance is changing, you'll never see it in your lifetime, or even a thousand more life times.
@@paulhamilton3026 yes Paul, I would have (and did) take that "too distant to observe" explanation as adequate, every day of the week and twice on Sunday. But No, it's the tip of the iceberg. You have to start with the massive local problems with the heliocentric model and when you put aside our natural revulsion to looking into anything so stupid as "flat level earth", you soon see the many problems. Up to 2019, I could not be convinced to even look at anything coming from the flat earth community, it was only because of some recent events that got me looking in 2020. I am not a person to accept "theory" only, especially when I have already accepted what I knew to be reality, (of course only a dummy thinks the earth is flat) so I set about doing my own measurements to really look carefully and purely scientifically, at all of the proofs for both sides. It's overwhelming, we have been lied to for at least 500 years and the globalist elites who run the money system, all our institutions, from education to science and media etc, are hiding that the earth is a closed system. The implications of this are staggering and the illusion of democratic government is the first to knock you off your feet when you understand it's all theatre for the sheep. Rather than try argue over distant hard to prove factors, go straight to the heart of the issue. If we are living on a ball earth, find the evidence for the curve? Let that be your starting point. Isolate the angular resolution limits of the human eye, via optical equipment and modern sensors and take measurements. I have one friend who is a life long astronomer, who refused to accept any of the arguments against the heliocentric position, even when we used a 1000 lens plus a 1.4 extender on 1.5x sensor, giving us 2100mm of reach, he was convinced that we were observing refraction, "a mirage" of the target, until we attached an infra-red sensor, we could all clearly see the heat signature of the "mirage" only then did he accept the curve calculations were absolutely wrong and he sought to investigated the whole issue with a different attitude. Today he is hard core flat earth, because he dug deep into all the issues, because you cannot discuss your way to the truth with short conversations. It's very simple, we are on a flat plane and we are NOT moving. I don't expect you to take any of what I am telling you on face value, because in 2019, I certainly wouldn't have. I would automatically be scouring my mind for examples and arguments that the FE proposition was simply wrong. The problem is we are basing our arguments on heliocentric lies and theory that cant be easily proven wrong without experimentation and scientific investigation. This is key to solving this problem. I do not know what is beyond that part of the Earth that we are not allowed to visit, Antartica/North Pole. I do not know what exactly is locking down our atmosphere, but I know for sure its not "gravity" I do not know what is preventing us from leaving low earth orbit, other than what is written in biblical texts/ancient times, we are enclosed in some kind of firmament. I first thought that the calculation for the size of the earth (its bigger than we thought) had to be the problem, but no matter what we allowed for, it soon became obvious that there is NO curve. When you STOP believing in the magical properties of the theory of gravity, the floodgates open and the heliocentric model falls apart. There are so many proofs that we are not on a spinning ball, when you "get them", its a major head-F that we never saw it before. You have to spend the time to watch the videos and properly interrogate the arguments. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence (NASA) and others, to support that we are being lied to on an industrial scale for a very long time. A lot is going on behind the scenes right now, and it is directly related to the FE revelation. I believe that major changes for humanity are just around the corner as a result of us learning for the first time in perhaps 500 years, exactly where we are, and maybe even who we are. Kind regards.
@@mikesammartano That doesn't explain the tilting. If the earth tilts around the sun then then the position of polaris should change significantly. It doesn't. Check any 30+ day timelapse from any position on earth and you will see it never ever ever moves. Not an inch. It's the center, right above the north pole...because the north pole is the center.
First of all, shout out to our eyes for having the ability to see 433 Light-years away. I give thanks to Our Ancestors for laying down the foundation for All of Us to pick up where they left off.
We can't see light-years away, these are lies. The stars are small and close in our sky; they disappear at high altitudes like in weather balloons. And all the other stars rotate around Polaris in fixed and repeating patterns - never changing. Earth is not moving.
@@JacobLM42 Not really. The inverse square law of light proves that a light’s brightness diminishes to a quarter every time you double the distance. With this one fact, you can unwind the lies of our so-called solar system and alleged planets as well as alleged distant stars.
Surprised you did not mention that Polaris is not just a single star but is a triple star system. It just looks like a single point of light when viewed by our unaided 'naked' eyes.
@@RobertTozzi Suggest you do your own research. But just in case : "Although appearing to the naked eye as a single point of light, Polaris is a triple star system, composed of the primary, a yellow supergiant designated Polaris Aa, in orbit with a smaller companion, Polaris Ab; the pair is in a wider orbit with Polaris B. The outer pair AB were discovered in August 1779 by William Herschel, where the 'A' refers to what is now known to be the Aa/Ab pair."
@@favesongslist I'll disagree with this opinion. Polaris, like all stars are not burning balls of gas in an alleged void of space, it is a pulsating orb of light, apparently energetic in nature as well as close and small. The idea of stars proposed by "science" fails when they disappear from sight in high-altitude weather balloons.
@@RobertTozzi What you said is moronic, speculative, based on the gap of your knowledge which you filled in with your superficial hypothesis. The conclusion that you came up didn't come from the method of empiricism. You didn't account for confounding variables in your hypothesis. One can easily disregard this as a rambling of a fool. No facts nor evidence.
If the earth is moving in 4 different directions simultaneously. Night and day, orbiting the Sun, the Sun orbiting the Galaxy and the legendary wobble. How does the Polaris star stay in the North Pole area year after year century after century with all of these movements?
Theyre claiming it moves 1degree every 70years but it was named polaris on a second century lol where it would be 25 degrees off Axis lol.ttuth od it never moves singlehandedly destroying heliocentrism
@Andy Salek star trail photography shows polaris moves,, it's not centre. And history shows Thuben was previously the closest star to the north Celestial pole. And history shows we navigate using both north and south Celestial poles. Pole stars are irrelevant, what's relevant is north and south Celestial poles, True north and true south.
@@michaelparsons2225 it makes a tiny circle and it does it for centuries. it means it doesnt move. nobody would call it a polaris if it moved 1 degree every 70 years. thats all i need to know to know its been there and it will. this would be one of good reasons not to trust history that much
@Andy Salek polaris does move, it's not centre and polaris is irrelevant. What's relevant is north and south Celestial poles, True north and true south
More like indoctrinating people across the plane. All of the stars rotate around Polaris, which is directly above the north star at all times. How does that work if we’re traveling in 4-directions about 4,500,000,000 miles per year? Well, it doesn’t.
Ok but according to your big bang space theory the whole universe is spanding, at the same time the earth is a constant circuit around the sun, at the time i thought the earth tilted on its axis causing summer/winter equally on both hemispheres, surely there must been some change in position since it was first noticed thousands of years ago.
There is no way the Earth is a ball spinning at 1,000 mph. Whoever still believes that after watching any timelapse of the stars is blinded by indoctrination.
@@aman-qj5sx oh really? Were you there thousands of years ago to observe it's change? If we are indeed spinning like a merry-go-round, then WHY AM I NOT DIZZY??? Furthermore, how can you even make that analogy on a ball earth theory? Merry-go-rounds are flat.
@@acidvat3052 your theory would assume that the sun is in directly associated and connected gravitationally with the stars. Also, it assumes the sun is 94.5 million miles away which, to this day, has not been proven. THEORETICAL SCIENCE IS NOT SCIENCE - IT'S A RELIGION!!!
How does it manage to stay in the same spot considering we are on a spinning ball circling the sun while at the same time chasing sun through the cosmos?
The stars are going around earth and around the north star :) this is what i believe. Both theories can be ''proven'' and would work IN THEORY. One is more logical and less complicated and also is true to your own perspective tho
Thanks! great video but I noticed a calculation mistake at 00:58 Polaris is about 433 light years away from earth. The speed of light is 300,000 km/sec(186,000 mile/sec), our fastest spaceship speed 8 km/sec(5 miles/sec), which means light is ABOUT 37,200 times faster than our spaceship. If it takes 433 years for the light to travel the whole distance, it would take us 433 multiplied by 37,200. so approximately 16 million years!
Also since its on the NP all the other stars rotate around it. Same with the southern star. But you would have to be on Antarctica to see it. Also just a note, you can't see it if you live south of the equator. All in all, polaris is my favorite star.
@En busca de la verdad Look it up where? A flat earth video? The southern star is called polaris Australis and it's the closest star to the south Celestial pole, not centre, closest visible star to centre. Magnitude 5.4 it's not bright enough to use for navigation, the reason we use the southern Cross to locate centre, true south
Also according to wikipedia, the resolution of your eyes is about an arcminute. So no not really noticeable . en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minute_and_second_of_arc
It's always in the same position, right over the North Pole. All of the stars and so-called planets (aka wandering stars) rotate around it, in regular repeating patterns (ie the zodiacal stars). We're supposed to believe that it only looks that way and we're supposed to believe that we're travelling 4.5 billion miles per year.
Growing up, the song "Right Down the Line" by Gerry Rafferty was popular. He sings that the Northern Star is the "Brightest star that shines". It drove me nuts because I knew that was a lie. Nobody else cared though
Bingo, you found the right question. Is there really a south pole? We won't really know for sure because of the Antarctic Treaty. I bet we won't ever find another stationary star like Polaris because the earth is possibly flat
@@BaysideSoundz wrong little flerf , every year people go to Antarctica , people even life and work there .. explain why you can’t see Polaris on the Southern Hemisphere ?
I may be wrong and I would love for the internet to let me know if I am please talk but shouldn't there be a similar star that we can see from South pole🤔
@@mikesammartano Hey man you might be interested in this I saw North star is also the center spinning point of the universe called "Pole Star", here is the explination and more. facebook.com/VedicCosmology/posts/the-pole-star-dhruvaloka-is-the-central-pivot-of-the-universal-planetary-systems/1545225325785394/
Quick question why doesn't Polaris move it stays stationary in the sky, would that mean from over 400 light years away Polaris is mirroring the exact wobbles and spins earth is doing? Seems kind of hard to believe.
It's because earth rotates west to east if the earth rotates north and south you would only see the star sometimes. Take a dot a put it on your roof rotate yourself 180 degrees and tell me when you look up you can still see the dot hence north start looking north is basically looking up from the earth.
Look to the left of Polaris and slightly upward to see the star Thuban. It is located halfway between the bend of the Big Dipper’s handle and the bowl of the Little Dipper. “Thuban was the North Star 4,800 years ago at the time of the ‘Old Kingdom’ in Egypt-a period when most of the pyramids were built,” Teske said. “The exact pole has crept from Thuban to its present position near Polaris and now is headed toward gamma Cephei, which will be the North Star in about 2,000 years.
having intention not to insult but to use words as precise as I can - until it is not forbidden for us to take a look at any astronomical chart (star map) ever found - whether it be Babylonian/Akkadian/Chaldean, Egyptian, Chinese, Greek, Arabic or even from cave art of cave people - we can easily recognize constellations and there is no even a room for serious discussion of nonsense that Polaris (star on the tip of a handle of lesser "stove/cup") circled around another star Thuban, which unknown and requires very good sight to be even seen by naked eye, but one day Thuban began circling around Polaris, and Sun, Moon and stars followed) So no, this is a weak and easy disprovable lie, not supported by any historical text or drawing, and contradicts every single of them from different continents, cultures, authors and texts - so why you even accepted such unbased lie when read it/ heard it?
@@JacobLM42 except the North Star still lines up with the air shaft of the pyramid of Giza and didn’t move from the view hole on the Georgia guide-stones for 40 years. There’s no evidence that it ever moved.
@@RobertTozzi No it doesnt, and yes it did move inside the hole if you had mesured it, dude stop this abosolutely stupid BS some random con man Flerf Daddy put into your brain, its laughable. ru-vid.com8gS5puV8-aI
@@RobertTozziit “hasn’t moved” for 40 years because the axial precession cycle takes 20,000 years. we aren’t ever going to see a difference in our lifetimes because it happens at a scale so much larger, 743.4 human generations larger to be exact
because it is look at david weiss videos called flat earth dave or rob skiba or jeranism show also uncommon ground on you tube with shawn and wes blaze
Can someone who lives in South Argentina 🇦🇷 tell if they can see the Polaris or north star. If can't this should means earth is NOT FLAT! I'll translate in Spanish
Polaris can be seen all the way to the 45 parallel. All stars rotate around Polaris. Polaris is in the same place in the sky during they day as it is at night but can only be seen at night. This is the verifiable proof the Earth is flat and stationary
Polaris can be seen all the way to the equator, but it CANNOT be seen south of the equator. Southern hemisphere stars appear to circle around the south celestial pole, NOT, Polaris. This is verifiable proof you don't know what you're talking about.
@Robert Tozzi Star trail photos from the equator show polaris at the horizon, do you disagree with how latitude works also? Imagine tine polaris visible from 45 degrees south and the huge sun vanishes in less distance. Your stupid logic debunks your fantasy. And basic research will prove you're wrong,,, but you gotta keep lying.
It's because earth rotates west to east if the earth rotates north and south you would only see the star sometimes. Take a dot a put it on your roof rotate yourself 180 degrees and tell me when you look up you can still see the dot hence north start looking north is basically looking up from the earth.
@Robert Tozzi Polaris Australis isn't bright, it isn't centre and it's not used for navigation because it isn't bright enough. The reason we use the southern Cross. Polaris is bright and also not centre, if there's no Polaris there's no north? Is that your flat logic?
the tilt is fixed in one direction, so when we’re on one side of the sun the north pole is pointing away from the sun (which would make it winter in the northern hemisphere) and on the opposite side of the sun the north pole would be pointing towards the sun (which would make it summer in the northern hemisphere) seasons happen because the earth is tilted *and* we orbit the sun, not just because of the tilt
I read the hyperlink that you put in the comments section under mylady22's comment. That is pretty cool 😎 it's like heaven, but for the angels(guardian and death). Thank you for you being you❣️
I noticed the Big Dipper is right outside my window by my bed although right now as I’m commenting this it is very cloudy so Polaris is not very bright, but I can find it
@@tezz2698 maybe billions, or trillions. Just listen to Neil Degrass and *just believe.* Whatever you do, don't think for yourself or you might start looking into what BS this is. All stars rotate around Polaris in the sky above us. Zodiacal stars rotate around it once per year, and wandering stars each have unique and repeating patterns in this "carousel" in the sky. We are not moving at all.
@@RobertTozzi Then how do you explain the differences between modern astronomical maps and ones from 2000-3000 years ago? Or the fact that stars in the Southern hemisphere rotate around the South Pole?
Hi! I wonder how Polaris can always be above or north of earth if our solar system and Polaris orbit around the center of the galaxy 🤔 wouldn't this make them change positions quite often so that it wouldn't be north anymore?
Over time the 'North' star will change. Polaris did not become the North Star until about AD 500. It will get closer to straight above the Earth’s north pole until sometime in 2102. Then it will move away again. It will be the closest star to the pole until about AD 3000.
@@RobertTozzi You can see the southern celestial pole from the entire southern hemisphere, although it's very close to the horizon if you are just south of the equator.
@@fromnorway643 if you could, it would refute the globe model, and as you couldn’t have a northern and southern pole star always staying in the same place if we’re traveling through the universe at 1,200,000 miles an hour. You can’t even have Polaris always staying over the North Pole if we’re traveling at that speed. If you are going to say the stars are so far away, look up the inverse square law of light.
@@RobertTozzi You have absolutely _no_ understanding of interstellar distances! The distance to Polaris is about *_13 million times_* larger than the width of the Earth's orbit around the Sun. Claiming that the apparent position of Polaris should change throughout the year is like claiming that the apparent position of a distant mountain should change if looking at it with your left eye and then your right eye. Our Sun would at most be visible from about 50 light-years away, but some giant stars are hundreds or even thousands of times brighter than our Sun. The giant star *_Rigel_* in Orion is about 100,000 times brighter, so using the inverse square law tells us that it would be visible from up to √100,000 x 50 = 15,800 light-years away.
@@fromnorway643 at allegedly 93 million miles away, the sun is 8 light minutes away. According to the inverse square law, at 16 light minutes, it would be a quarter of the brightness; at a light hour, it would be 1/56th of the brightness; a light day away, it would be 1/32,400 th of the brightness. So no, we’re not seeing anything from light days away, definitely not light years away. That’s impossible.
@@ericdavis219 its funny because they all attack as if we are less than human. Or as if they are more than human for thinking that type of way. Maybe in some time line or different space, we could all get together and openly talk about Truth without ridicule. Hoping you and others are meditating and praying to see what lies beyond our body complexes. Time is of the essence until it no longer is!!
@@rvnn4957 you mean the plasma moon which is a mirror image of our continents, known and unknown? And our plasma sun portal which is another construct that the parasites created to breach the toroidal field of our crater on a much larger earth? Draw a horizon line. There you go. Ten points if you used a ruler. Fly in an airplane and then tell me why it’s flat as far as the eye can see. Why does a pilot never correct for the curve?Or architects? Imagine the twin towers looking like chopsticks in a bowl of rice. Please do some research, any amount will affirm that things are not the way we were taught. Check out gogvlemaste, Radiation Matters, and others. See the Hereford map. Listen to the interviews of Admiral Byrd. I have a star map. It’s a book that has a round disk of all the constellations on it. You turn the disk and voila! New season and new stars in the view finder. It’s a flat disk. For all the calculations and all the balls supposedly spinning, a flat piece of paper seems to do just fine to explain the sky. We were taught in school that our perceptions were off and there were these optical illusions that needed to be explained by complex mathematics. I call bs on that. Just free your mind from the programming and really consider why the bottom of a cloud is flat and why a ship on the horizon is a tiny ship and not just the mast sticking up. Don’t be afraid to look with your own eyes. Don’t be afraid to question. There are worse things than to be ridiculed for holding views different than the masses. Not questioning authority is one of them.
