It’s kinda dark really to think about it. No traffic violation, tags not coming back is bull and she knows it. Impossible to disprove cause if they run it again and it does come back then they can just say it was a system glitch. I don’t believe the police are running tags all day randomly. Windows too dark. More bull. The second he realises who it is he wants to get out of there quick as he can knowing he was in the wrong. That’s really bad. If this is the common occurrence for people of colour in Florida that must put relations with the police at a complete low.
Anti - Ethnic Cleansing eh. well I’m not black so I’m not sure how I’d be the one with a victim complex in this scenario. You can’t make traffic stops for no reason. That’s what happened here. Very obvious from the police officers demeanour and his obvious discomfort when he realised he’d stopped someone who could spot his mistake and in theory have him reprimanded. Police have a very tough job and deserves tons of support but that doesn’t mean ignoring bad practice. If you want to go ahead and think that was a routine traffic stop then by all means please do so.
Chadillac you mean all black people steal cars ? I wasn’t aware that stealing cars was directly related to melanoma in your skin. How very curious. I tan pretty easily does this mean I’m at risk of stealing something a little slower like maybe a bicycle or a skateboard. I’ll have to be on the lookout for that next summer.
This is old but he clearly knew she was with an 'agency' which was above his pay grade because his first question was..'What agency are you with' which her driver's license presumably doesn't show. He went so far as to give his own personal ID despite that car not being his.
You are a fool and easily amused, why would any of that catch your attention? First of all you are alluding to him having some trepidation, well they weren't worried about her in the slightest. Here are the facts she had Absolutely no authority there in any way, she knew it, the officers knew it, and now you know it. Next why would they have any worries? Here are the facts that traffic stop was positively lawful in every detail period. Officially logged, authenticated, verified and a matter of public record. None of those things you think affect that stop are a truthful portrayal of anything except your worthless projection. I bet you've stuttered, cleared your throat, hesitated in a speaking idea, and more all of the is overtly meaningless period.
She was no boss of anyone on the police department, she is merely an attorney paid by the state to litigate cases brought to her by the law enforcement agencies. That traffic stop was absolutley lawful in every detail period and verifiable so. She had absolutley no authority there.
You might be right she isn't their boss! However, she is the Elected District Attorney. In the full video, the officer said another reason why he pulled over her state issue while was because of window tint. Mind you, it's a state-issued car with tags. The whole thing screams of profiling. So you're wrong
Yes, she was dismissed of cases and duties and is now long gone from any state offices that smile was of no consequence except to see to your foolish amusement. Those officers are still on the job making stops and enforcing the law
@@patrickrichardson1036 I’m not sure your point… Outside of having way too much time on your hands to keep up with the personal lives of strangers. I saw this video and passing. What are you doing with your spare time? On the Internet trying to one up strangers? #StalkerAlert Congratulations! 😐👏🏽
@@TheGreatCommission777 Why would how much time I have concern you in the slightest? Next her smile was meaningless as I corrected this poster, next I am keeping the record correct and have engaged at that not just here but also on other errant threads for years what does a YT post have to do with anyone's personal life, a post here is quite public as you well know! That help you out any?
@@patrickrichardson1036 you just walked into my point… I know your personal life must be dull and/or filled with chaos if you’re trying to passively aggressively escape misery by “correcting” strangers on the internet, like a dog on the side of the road, barking at traffic as it goes by! Congratulations on your accomplishments of infinite nothingness!!! Now what? Nothing… On to your next comment… 😐👉🏽
@@TheGreatCommission777 What a load of self proliferating manure and you know it. Your overtly stilted diatribe has nothing to do with that lawful traffic stop in Orlando.Walked into your point? How juvenile you take a lot on yourself and for the least pay back. Now to return to your folderol her smile was meaningless and nothing more than transient "face saving"" account for the body cameras and served her no good end period. She had no authority there she knew it, the officers knew it and now you know it!! As to your kindergarten kiddie drawings of fire, I can teach you how to use words and language as we grownups use to communicate and no those officers are still on the job happily making stops and doing their sworn duties. But I will update you as to reality, she having been dismissed of multiple duties and cases by the governor is long long gone from any state offices. So you get busy with words and language to make a civil and non retractable ''POINT''' of aquesiasece. Now as to the topic my friend, this traffic stop was absolutely lawful in every detail period.
Actually, no. They're white and cops, not going to lose they're jobs. Not going to be wrongful jailed. Not going to be shot. The know they followed their cover protocols. No problems.
@@Seagull780 to me this should not be a debate. The racial profiling should stop. American laws and system need to be the same for all Americans. Anyone who doesn't adhere should be cast out. The rights and obligations should be the same. Kkk needs to be outlawed as a terrorist group, so should the black panthers or any watchdog group th's not been vested as an extension to normal policing. Police officers should carry a camera that needs to be on everytime they are on the beat. Racism of any form should be outlawed and the prison stats should be looked at. Any judge found disproportionately condemning a kid from another race should be stripped of the coveted robe. Only then will we see an end to this madness
Police in states are so messed up. i can't believe it. For example..Police stopped her just cos she is an African American and did not black woman to own nice car with tinted window. C'mon.Whats kinda of logic is that.
Are cops in the U.S. really able to pull someone over like that? Where I live, a cop must have a legal reason to stop someone like that. Her windows weren't tinted to the point where it was illegal, so unless I am wrong about your legal system, he didn't have any right to stop her.
@@anonymouscommentor411 apparently the tag didn't come back "legit" with registration info, so they thought it was a fake, possible stolen vehicle. The responsible thing would be to investigate how that happened, bug in the system or operator error, that is of course if we truly cared about solving these incidents.
@@anonymouscommentor411 Yes they are really able to pull over someone just like that. All they have to do is make up a fake suspicion. It happened to me two weeks ago in Illinois. I was profiled because I had Colorado plates on my rental car and I stopped in at a rest area for only a minute just to check my map. By the time every thing was done, the car I was driving had been sniffed by a drug sniffing dog, a scent of drugs was found near the rear passenger wheel, and my car was searched along with my two bags of personal belongings. After nothing was found the alleged officers told me to have a nice day. I say alleged because the officers would not identify themselves or even what agency they work for. Want the kicker? These types of stops are perfectly legal if immoral. What the supreme court has done is to allow our law enforcement agencies a way to get around the fourth and fourteenth amendments which are supposed to guarantee our privacy privacy and unlawful search rights. So if you think we don't live in a communist country, think again. BTW. I'm in my 60's and have never had a serious infraction of any kind. Even my last speeding ticket was over forty years ago.
@@bobtony6036 But why did they check the tag in the first place? I don't believe they're just checking every car they're coming by. They saw a black woman in an expensive car and thought: Let's check it out. Maybe the car is stolen.
You couldnt be more wrong, incorrect, or inaccurate. What do you mean who he pulled over? As everyone knows she had no authority there, no state attorney has any authority with any law enforcment agency or enforcment action including this one. What was required of her was compliance and she complied not only nicely but politely at that. The officer required her I D which she submitted to him and once examined her document and found her to be legal he then freed her to depart. Here are the facts this traffic stop was absolutly lawful in every detail period.
@@PatrickRichardson-gj3wb Exactly. The reason they were “good” is because she had a government plate but it wasn’t registered properly so the tag came up non-existent. Once he realized she was legitimately a government official, it became pretty obvious that it was a mistake by her office and not a stolen car or plate. Everyone acting like she dunked on them is crazy, she admitted it was a legitimate stop after the fact
@@PatrickRichardson-gj3wbI know it’s hard to believe if you’ve had a privileged life, but some of us that have different skin tones DIE or get our ass beat in situations like this - Regardless if we’re calm or not.
@@chrissmith6018 Oh of course it is I am just the ""Poor ole perpetual victim I never smart off to an officer, I never try to run or avoid capture, I never defile or break the law, I have a halo and am an altruistic soul in the service to others and for no reason this man just jumps me""! Well I'll tell you I am not privileged or special in any way and I have been stopped and detained by law agencies and peace officers of every conceivable shade, and have yet to be in any manifest difficulty as I observed the order of things listened to and obeyed commands and emerged in every incidence totally un harmed. So do you want to attribute that to luck or wisdom. As to you I'd say just from you scribing's you possess a certain recalcitrance and errant demeanor, and that is swimming upstream against the current and would be better served with an attitude accounting. To return to the subject at hand this traffic stop was absolutly lawful in every detail period.
She is just a regular person. Just because shes black doesnt really make her different. Just because she holds a public position doesnt make her and better or worse either.
She seems to be so calm and intelligent women. I'd like to be there with her to learn things. That's why I love calm people. They have so much in store ☺️
You couldnt be more wrong, incorrect nd inaccurate, the lawful traffic stop was for registration irregularities and that alone, that officer F'd up nothing!! This traffic stop was positivly lawful in every detail
@@PatrickRichardson-gj3wb No, it’s called PROFILING. They need a lawful reason to stop you if you did commit and or a traffic violation then it’s a crime. She clearly did nothing wrong. So, the cop says clearly “oh we run tags all the time” openly admitting he breaks unlawful tag runs on ANYBODY when she’s was looking for a reason for the stop then he proceeds to say “and your windows are really dark”. She smiles, like I got this fool 😏
@@user-J_Nj-777jjk WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, This traffics stop was absolutly lawful in every detail period. She herself in multiple press interviews and personal comments states and I quote her here""This stop appears to be consistent with Florida law"" says she. So if there was the slightest hint of any profiling she could not state that. Next the law in the U S is plain law enforcment may (and does) registration inquiries (run tags) randomly, Law enforcment may run tags anywhere, any time, for any reason, or for no reason at all just for officer information, that is the law and has been for decades, and supported by the supreme court thus they needed no reason whatsoever to inquire of her plates and likely they were run by an ALPR and electronic scanner used in the U S and foreign country's to make registration inquiries. hundreds of plates at a time automatically. The window tint remark at this stop was nothing more than conversational observation, if he"d have believed the tint was in violation he'd have detained her further and summoned a luminometer from the supervisor for a measurement-----HE DID NOT!! No measurement equals no violation! This traffic stop was for registration violation and that alone!! Once again this traffic stop was absolutly lawful in every single detail officially logged, verified, authenticated and a matter of public record. That is the was it stands, and has for half a dozen years!!
Scared of what? A state attorney. LMAO! They're just as dumb as anyone. They did nothing wrong and she even admits they did nothing wrong. So she asks for their cards. You know how many times an officer gets asked for his name and badge number? It makes the subject feel like they are in control of something. Which amounts to shit!!!
Wow so what part do you like the most watching her comply with the officers or when he examined her documents and found her to be lawful and then freed her to depart!
@@ghost.protocol yes. That is exactly what it means. Just business cards. We are not obliged to hand then out but do so as a courtesy. Any time you are contacted by the police their name and badge number are on the citation or police report along with the other officers present. People often times ask them from us as an attempt at intimidation. The "now i know who you are" mentality but nothing is being hidden regardless
@@id1763 we have discretion to write or not write a ticket. We so not give tickets to everyone we stop for a traffic infraction, even if the person is a public employee. Additionally, once he found that her unregistered license plates belo ged to a government official and was allowed to have such plates, he had no grounds to cite her for anything.
@@id1763 Yeah you're very right. Police should always follow rules and not over step their authority by targeting indiduals who have broken no laws. They are to serve and protect citizenry not act above the law. 👍🏽
This cop literally shit his pants when he realized that not only was he not going to be able to play stupid cop games but he was actually going to get played himself
You couldn't be more wrong, incorrect, and inaccurate, what would lead you to believe that load of false manure you posted here? First of all as everyone knows she had no authority there whatsoever. State attorneys have no administrative or personal function with any law enforcement agency in any way. What was expected of her was compliance and that is just what she did and politely at that. After the officer examined her agency document and found her to be legal he then freed her to depart. This traffic stop was positively lawful in every detail period officially logged, authenticated verified and a matter of public record.
You couldnt be more wrong, incorrect, and inaccurate. Why would he be ""Nervous""? She was certainly no threat there to him in any way. As everyone knows she had no authority there, as everyone knows state attorneys have no authority with ANY law enforcment agencies or law enforcment actions, including this one. No he was not nervous, those officers are still on the job happily making stops and enforcing the law. This traffic stop was positivly lawful in every detail.
@@AllenHanPR You idiots never quit do you? They were no such thing! They are still on the job making stops enforcing the law and doing their sworn duties. She however was dismissed of multiple cases by the governor and is long gone from any state offices. There couldn't possibly be any reason to fire them for anything from this traffic stop in that this traffic stop was absolutly lawful in every single detail, officially logged, authenticated verified and a matter of public record!
@@PatrickRichardson-gj3wbYou obviously don't understand the projection of emotion through speech. He sounded very nervous, as if his reasons of stopping her weren't for rightous or practical reasons more of a power trip. Doesn't matter if she decided not to go for a re-election. The officer was nervous because the former state attorney of Florida questioned their decision to stop her. That's all.
@@ZezeRia44 There is NO logical reason for any nervousness whatsoever first of all as everyone knows she had no authority there. Next there is provable no lack of any foolish righteousness in that this traffic stop was absolutly lawfull in every single capacity, thus why would any officer doing a 100 percent job have the slightest trepidation---he did not! It is illogical.
What sort of foolishness are you talking about his voice had nothing to do with anything here. First of all as everyone knows she had no authority there! A state attorney has no authority with ANY law enforcment agency or action including this one, so he wasn't the slightest bit trepidatious. Next this traffic stop was absolutely lawful in every detail so why would he be concerned with her in anyway except to see that she complies and she not only compiled properly but politely as well.
You couldnt be more WRONG, INACCURATE AND INCORRECT how did he F*ked up you have no idea what you are talking about first of all, asking for those cards was meaningless, as everyone knows she had no authority there a state attorney has no authority with ANY law enforcement agency. Next this traffic stop was absolutely lawful in every detail period. Those officers are still happily on the job making stops and enforcing the law and she is long long gone from any state offices.
@@theone9224 Wrong the traffic stop was totally lawful the stop was made when her tag did not return from the radio data link, that was noted officially logged authenticated verified and a matter of public record and you just stay wrong you have no idea about any white supremacy that is nothing but a trash assumption, again this traffic stop was absolutly lawful in every detail and provably so!!
What a fool you are she was no worry to him. That window tint was not the official reason for the stop and was meaningless, he needed no luminometer (tint measure) those officers are still on the job, she having been dismissed of duties and cases by the governor however, is long long gone from any state offices.
@@aranbrico1005 If her windows were dark, how did he know she was black BEFORE he pulled her over? Not to mention, so many here act like a cop isn't supposed to pull someone if they are black. What's up with that?? Do you think they are special? Are they exempt fro the laws the rest of us have to abide by? Ooops. I forgot. It's racist now if someone mentions thing s like that. LMAO
You couldnt be more wrong, incorrect or inaccurate, why would he? There was no reason and he knew it, she had no authority there, a state attorney has no authority with ANY law enforcment agency or enforcment action including this one. Here are the facts: What was expected of her was her compliance, and she not only complied properly but politely at that. The officer required her I D which she submitted to him and after he examined her document and determined she was legal he then freed her to depart, ending that lawful traffic stop then and there. So my misguided friend there was no bodily functions involved on his part in any way. This traffic stop was absolutely lawful in every detail period.
You couldnt be more wrong, inaccurate, or incorrect, there isn't the slightest hint of any profiling here, and that insipid smile of hers was meaningless, and she knew it, it served her no good end. Here are the facts the window tint had absolutly nothing official to do with this traffic stop. This traffic stop was for vehicle registration irregularities and that alone. This traffic stop was positively lawful in every detail period and those are (the bulk) of the facts.
@@jacksoxman9000 It's so ridiculous to see how copsuckers like you just do everything you can to defend cops. Being a police officer isn't the most dangerous job in America.... It isn't even on the top ten most dangerous. The most dangerous is a logger, followed by a fisherman. Since those jobs don't involve massive Police Unions, I guess most of the public gleams over these facts, right?
Police instinctively abuse their authority. They do not identify with the concept ‘Protect and Serve’. Did anyone else notice the arrogance with which they engaged the Attorney?
Doug Davis yes Doug AMEN. Right? I don’t give the police any reason to even put their hand near their gun. I’ve never ever had a problem with the police.
How foolish!! That smirk meant nothing except that she possibly had gas. She had Absolutely no authority there whatsoever, she knew it, the officers knew it and now you know, The foolish grin was fruitless, Here are the facts that traffic stop was Absolutely lawful in every detail period. officially logged, authenticated, verified, and a matter of public record. Those officers are still on the job making stops, enforcing the laws, she on the other hand was dismissed of multiple state attorney duties by the governor and is long gone and far removed from any state office in any way period.
Why wouldn't she low play it? She had absolutley no authority there whatsoever. What was required of her was compliance, which she did and politely. The officer required her I D which she submitted to him, after he examined the documents and found her to be legal, he then freed her to depart. That concluded the lawful traffic stop then and there. that traffic stop was absolutley lawful in every detail and verifiably so period.
Her reactions and body language speak volumes more than this doofus ever will If I was in her position, I wouldn’t even tell them anything except “see you in court” and light ‘em up like there’s no tomorrow
You have no Idea what you are talking about, she was not about to see anyone in court owing to the fact that there was not a hint of any case to be tried, she knew that, the officer knew that and now you know it. Here are the facts this traffic stop was positivly lawful in every detail period, officially logged, authenticated, verified and a matter of public record.
@@jimmyrustles9911 No such thing occurring with me you may be referring to your mother or other family members. Never the less good to hear from you, and as always this traffic stop remains positivly lawful in every detail.
She better not state attorney or not she is still a so called black woman in America and she seems to understand that. There is a pecking order no matter what your position is. Don’t ever forget your place in the hierarchy.
@@Barak144 your so called "hierarchy" literally mean racism. Regardless, in that moment, she holds a higher position than those police officers, that is where change will come from.
The windows had absolutely nothing to do with this traffic stop, the stop officially was for registration irregularities alone. This traffic stop was absolutely lawful in every detail! I see you youse kindergarten kiddie art to attempt to communicate , but we grown ups and intelligent people use language not children's stick drawings of kiddie smiley faces and symbols, I can teach you how to make a point with words as an adult if you like.
@@patrickrichardson1036 🥾😛.... you missed a spot.... you edited your comment... and STILL ended up with "youse" in it..... wow... but please continue about how you'll teach me about words... and if the stop had nothing to do with the windows... how come the doofus mentioned them.... you have to be an older person... there's NO WAY you're seasoned at using the internet and insulting people with verbiage like THAT... so please.. Sprinkle some metamucil in your prune juice.... don't forget your stool softener... and drink something warm... that should keep you regular.... have a nice day
@@elijahspeller6796 What a juvenile attempt at insults, I have a sticking key and you are looking to what? Metamucil, and prunes to set a term paper federal case adrift here . Of course your fetid scribings and fruitless extempore of gastric renown are certain to see you with a Pulitzer nomination. Regardless none of that (erstwhile) creativity for which you strive with strained alacrity hasn't the slightest to do with the subject, the traffic stop: which is, was and shall always be absolutely lawful in every detail. Your kiddie art drawing lexigrams notwithstanding. The officer has first amendment rights to mention anything he cares to, but if he'd have believed the glass to be in violation he'd have detained her further and summoned a luminometer....he did not! No measurement equals no violation thus the official violation was for registration violation and that alone! Officially logged verified and a matter of public record, thus you are wrong, incorrect and inaccurate and shall remain so in perpetuity.
@@patrickrichardson1036 Get a life brother. I swear you've been replying to every single comment that slightly suggests the cop was in the wrong, for over a year now.
@@bean6520 You are in correct I have replied it has been much longer than that and the reason is misinformed fools are trying to "gin" up foolishness. Now to you I have a fine life keeping the record correct and accurate so thanks.
razz P seemed to me like she smiled because the dark windows thing sounded like he made it up on the spot and was grabbing for straws. And just like all citizens, citizens are not required to sit and act like they buy whatever the cop is selling.
razz P She is privileged, she knew she was illegally pulled over but she also knew he couldn't justify it bc of who she was. If she wasn't who she was, it could have been way different.
+Caesar Vespasian ok.... so when did you see her get "sassy" with lip smacking, finger snapping? She is the State Attorney, which means you have to actually sit for the Bar Examination, actually TAKE the test (and they ID you, strict rules about no "In and Out", etc) AND Pass it to become a Lawyer. Methinks you're just butt hurt because an Intelligent Black Woman GOT ELECTED to serve. Nothing rigged about that. If you're going to say voting is rigged, then lets talk about that fucktard orange abomination in OUR white house, because he's lowering our Property Values every damn day he is left there to run amok- like the lowlife animal he is.
What do you mean? Her being a minor office holder had no effect on this traffic stop in any way. As everyone knows she had no authority there, a state attorney has no authority with ANY law enforcment agency or action including this one. What was expected of her was compliance and comply she did and politely at that. The officer required her I D which she submitted to him and after he examined the document and found her to be legal he then freed her to depart. Ending that lawful traffic stop then and there. This traffic stop was absolutely lawful in every single detail.
As far as I'm concerned she's a scumbag just like the pigs, remember she prosecutes innocent people that the same pigs pull over on a faily basis. They are on the same team.
You couldnt be more wrong incorrect and in accurate, those foolish facial contortions of hers meant nothing, she had no authority there as everyone knows a state attorney has no authority with ANY law enforcment agency or enforcment action including this one. This traffic stop was for registration irregularities and only that. She was no threat to those officers in any way. She knew it, the officers knew it and now you know it, as to your worthless opinion of their employment those policemen are still happily on the job making stops and enforcing the law. She however having been dismissed of multiple state attorney duties by the governor is long long gone from any state offices. The facts are these: This traffic stop was positivly lawful in every detail PERIOD!
I love how she starts smiling as soon as he tries to bullshit his way out of it with the "I don't have a tint measurer but your windows are really dark" line.
@@AydinTiras I can’t tell if this is a joke or not... if it’s so bad here then why do you live here? Should we just get rid of all of the police, since they cause more trouble than they help.
WRONG! The window tint is in no way any official reason for the stop, the only reason for the stop and detainment is for registration irregularities and that alone!! This traffic stop was absolutly lawful in every detail!
@@PatrickRichardson-gj3wb so you know for a fact that there were irregularities with her registration? I’m guessing your source for that knowledge is “cause a Jack boot thug said so and they aren’t trained to lie!”
@@machans372 Yes everyone involved in the stop knows there were irregularities and she herself knew it. The inquiry to the radio data link is recorded and the return results are recorded logged, date and time stamped to the tenth of a second, and all of it officially logged authenticated, verified and a matter of public record. This traffic stop was positivly lawful in every detail period.
MrWolfSnack no, not really, maybe you have a different definition of sounding scared but nothing the cop said sounded scared whatsoever. The judge seems kind of ignorant on how cops patrol and run plates.
MrWolfSnack how did his “excuse” fail? He said I ran your plate and no name came up which he hadn’t seen before. I think black people want to paint the police as bad, even when there is nothing to be mad about. You also take the time to be happy when a black judge “scares” the police, which didn’t happen.
What a juvenile and childish entry, and nothing further from the truth, as everyone knows she had no authority there. After her dismissal by the governor of cases and duties, she is likely serving at Ihop. Those officers are still happily on the job making stops and enforcing the law, she however is long long gone from any state offices.
@@PatrickRichardson-gj3wbthe implication here is that the officers couldn’t get out of there fast enough after realizing they pulled over someone up the chain. I don’t know what kind of political views you have nor do I care. All I see here is an interaction that went awkward pretty quick. Using terms such as “Childish” and “Juvenile” while picking a fight with a random stranger on the internet is kind of hypocritical don’t you think?
@@hussamtahir915 Here are the facts: Up what chain? As everyone knows she had no authority there. Also it is very well known that a state attorney has no authority with ANY law enforcment agency or action including this one. They were in no more of a hurry than they would be for anyone other than someone with a conditional tag. What the officer required from her was compliance and she not only compiled properly but politely as well. They required her I D which she submitted to them and after the officer examined and viewed her agency I D and found her to be legal he then freed her to depart. She was operating a crp registration and her I D supported that. They were in no trepidation in an way that would be illogical owing to the fact that his traffic stop was absolutly lawful in every single detail.
That smirk was meaningless and no the officer wasn't reaching for a thing. The window tint was no an official reason for the stop. She was stopped and detained for vehicle registration irregularities and that alone. This traffic stop was absolutely lawful in every single detail.
That was after he tried to respond with a reason for the stop and it sounded like BS, both the reasons and particularly the way he delivered the response.
ShadowⓋ I see. Okay, so I see you not only failed to answer the question but chose to slander all of those who protect you and enforce the law and assume their motives but also chose to assume mine. I’ll take that as him wetting his pants from this situation was simply a fantasy of yours and you know it didn’t actually happen and that there are no indications he was scared what so ever.
You couldn't be more wrong, incorrect and in accurate!! Why would you conjecture up such foolishness? Nothing of the kind took place there, first of all she had absolutly no authority there as everyone knows, Next the officers were within all protocols, and next this traffic stop was positively lawful in every detail period.
"She looks forward to an open dialogue", surely after all she was so "cooperative" during the convo 🤷 u could literally feel the "warmth" vibes from her
+Austin Peters The tint in backdoors and backwindow can be as dark as you like, it only the frontdoors there is a degree on, and you never see any tint on the frontdoors because both her windows are down, so it can be all legal, it just the cop coming up with some "bullshit" on the spot, do to finding a legal reason to have stop the car, where State Attorney is behind the wheel...
In the state of florida there is a limit on the back windows of a car. The back windows must allow more than 15% of light in www.tintcenter.com/laws/FL/ tintlaws.com/florida-window-tint-law.php
I never understood that. Is it a hierarchy thing? A reasonable person, who I’m assuming the state attorney is, could not and would not affect a simple police officer’s career over a routine stop. Am I right to say that?
@@anwarabdulrahman2506 You're right to say that, but you're wrong about which way it is Police in the US regularly make up shit and abuse their power. If they ever do that to a state attorney, they're *fucked*
We know how they behave normally. There are 10 million arrests made a year in the US. Virtually all of them are handled without any police malfeasance. People seem to be content to look through a keyhole and think they’re seeing the whole picture.
I almost wish she wouldn't have identified herself as a state attorney. Just getting a dumb ticket and slapping them with the "UNO Reverse" card in court would've been a nice wake-up call to these morons. That "your tags came back with nothing on it" sounds like some bullshit, to me. Why not write her a ticket for having an invalid tag? #ALieDontCareWhoTellIt
cops just legit run random tags... when I was a teenager I actually had cops follow me across town following dangerously close at night and I was to a point where I was going to make formal complaints. I don't agree with it but they do fish in that respect has little to do with her race and moreso that they will fish to get anybody on something.
Morons huh? So what if someone murdered your Mom and they were on the loose. Cop pulls over someone with bad tags and blacked out windows and catches the murderer? Think that's never happened before? Think again
You are a fool why would you think such a foolish thought? Nothing of the kind was even approached as everyone knows she had no authority there to do anything as everyone knows a state attorney has no authority with any law enforcment agency or action including this one. Next this traffic stop was absolutly lawful in every detail those policemen are still happily on the job making stop and enforcing the law, she however haven been dismissed of multiple duties by the governor is long long gone from any state offices.
love that in Minneapolis Minnesota, minor traffic stops are no longer allowed. Less power to bored police looking for trouble in people trying to go about their day.
Minneapolis ranks well above the national average for crime, of the top 50 cities of over 100K population dear old "Mini" rates well up there at number 18, there are already plans to reverse some of those foolishly relaxed safety and enforcement measures, there is nothing stopping any return.
What fools you misfits are, and perennially ill educated aren't you? Why would he have the slightest difficulty with his throat. Here are the facts. She is merely a minor county lawyer, who hasn't the slightest authority there whatsoever. Next this traffic stop was positively lawful in every detail period, officially logged, authenticated , verified and a matter of public record.
@Zack Scheffer ...& everyone doesn't get pulled over for it. You think the state attorney was asking for their cards with a smirk for recreation? People who lie spout unconvincing statements, ie "Uh..this isn't my car.".
@Zack Scheffer which is an invasion of privacy.The car was not reported stolen and had not committed any traffic violation. There's no reason to run a tag...talk about dictatorship! Creepy. Her "crime" was Driving a nice car, while being black" .
That smile was meaningless unless she had indigestion, as everyone knows a state attorney has no authority with any law enforcment agency or any enforcment action including this one. What was expected of her was her compliance and she complied nicely and politely at that, the officer required her I D which she submitted to him and after he examined her document he then freed her to depart, concluding that lawful traffic stop then and there. This traffic stop was positively lawful in every detail period.
She is on his side but because of this she ain't. The fact he don't know who she is but yet will need her when he does something stupid shows the issue here. Police are just regular people and should be treated as such.
What a load of manure, she had absolutely no authority there whatsoever, she knew it, the officer knew it and now you know it. This traffic stop was positively lawful in every detail period. Plus she is long gone from any state office period.
@@brucelee5576 They had better than that they had the offense of uncertified registration violation, when the radio data link failed to return the required statute information. Those officers weren't the slightest bit worried, in that she had absolutely no authority there in any way. That traffic stop was absolutely lawful in every detail, officially logged, authenticated verified and a matter of public record.
@@brucelee5576 I can assure you it was just that hot Florida climate, she had nothing to do with their throats in that she had Absolutely no authority there and couldn't dry up lizards throat. They had no fear or trepidation knowing that she had no authority she knew it, the officers , knew and so did everyone who had knowledgeful of these erstwhile minor county lawyers.
Exactly, when police windows are darker than everyone else's. THEY are the public servant, not us. What if they're abusing or raping someone inside the car and nobody can see it.
@TADionysus TAD, you have a case of arrogant ignorance. 1. You're the one who doesn't have a clue about my point. Hmm, so dark tint keeps it cooler inside for police dogs, okay. So do you think police dog lives are more important than citizen dogs lives? Or should they have equal rights?? And how about actual human beings inside the car? Babies, children? How about when the car A/C goes out in a state like FL? If the government can do it, then you and I can do it. That's called equal rights. It's what the founding fathers believed in, it's private property rights, it's common sense. Police claim to care about kids being left in hot cars and such at stores right, so if they actually cared then, by your own logic, they'd support all of us having the darkest tint to keep it cooler inside the car, and they wouldn't enforce tint laws. The police are hypocrites whenever they harass someone over window tint, plain and simple. Nice try, though.
Dude, yes the police get special priviledges. They're the police. And really, "what if they are raping" this is nonsense man. Our society has zero respect for authority anymore. But whatever, lets just let people do whatever they want, freedom of rights and all that...
@@carolcrowley3040 Thank you Carol, that's exactly what i'm talking about, but some people still don't get it. The way it is now is backwards. The reason cops are so brazen as to do such things is because they know the system is tilted in their favor and they have too much power and privilege. The way it should be is that citizens should be free to have fully tinted windows on our private property, and public servant cops should be forced to have clear windows. They are the ones who voluntarily chose to be a cop, so how can we hold them accountable when they're doing their job in secret. If they have nothing to hide they should have no problem with it.
@@timjthru They get additional privileges because they have to deal with shit like this: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-4i86SUNFFzs.html.
Cop won't run tags if they believe da vehicle is your. I recently got pulled over for the same nonsense and I was parked with all my windows down. The cop asked me to raise my windows up once my plate came up clear, and I started to question his harassment.
Wrong! The ALPR scans plates electronically and reports that data to the link, which reruns the information and status to the officer, that ALPR doesn't care who the owner of record is. Next you need to can that harrassment trash an officer performing his sworn duty is not harassment in any way. That window tint law is on the books as a result of you and your fellow citizens representatives acting on your behalf has authored and passed that regulation, if you object to the tint statute then contact your district representative and ask he or she to amend or repeal the rule, in the meantime it is the law and will be enforced.
Fucking unreal this cops response, good for her! Get these biased ass cops off the streets! I hope she seriously makes sure these pricks were reprimanded.
We don't need people spreading more hatred towards the cops you obviously do not like police officers or you would have kept your stupid opinion to yourself...
I'm not saying she is a "God" but being a state attorney holds a respectful and a powerful status, and although the windows were dark, you could see through. Not a good enough reason to pull someone over, but I don't live there so I don't know the law tbh.
