My buddy raced against one of these Trans Ams in his Ford F-100 that had a straight six and column shifted 3 speed. I couldn't believe it when we pulled ahead of the Pontiac by a car length and the truck just kept pulling away.
One of my friends had the 1981 Turbo TA. He would tout the turbo 301 & rave about the boost gage until he lined up against 455 SD TA. All we saw was the smoke from the SD's tires & tail lights. The Turbo TA got blown away.
That is one funky setup, it looks like there's tons of room for improvement tho. You could improve upon every aspect of that induction system with porting or custom manifolds. I wouldn't be surprised if just a work over of the manifolds, turbo and exhaust without even getting into the engine you could gain 50hp or more? And some basic head porting and a cam you could easily put it over 300hp...
They do. TTA performance has a ton of great bolt ons. With all original GM internals, and E85, their street driven development car is running high 12s in the quarter. With 3.08 gears.
I have a fresh 301 and a trany with a clean 79 I really want to find that manifold so I can put it together and get use out of that engine it's dynod at 227 so I imagine that will add sum spunk to it ...if I can't find one at a junk yard near albuquerque I'll just go with blow through but I really don't feel experienced enough to tune that setup seems draw through is simple enough to get right it's this or nos but that' will just munch that motor I'd like to have it run good enough to have mom tak it to work she wants newer muscle car but I am sticking on stupid and working with what I have this vid helped me visualize the set up thank you I really don't want to pull the 400 out of my lemans for the firechicken
It’s amazing how they managed to Ram all the air through that little 2-1/4 hole 🕳 in the intake. I guessing if they went larger they would lose too much low end torque.
@@raysoto1969 It didn't out perform most traditional engines either. But as you yourself mentioned, it was all Pontiac had left, in 80-81. Too bad they weren't able to continue it, (and improve it), in the 3rd gens
@@joequillun7790 The problem with it was lousy gas at the time. You really couldn’t get much more then crap 87 octane. With no internal engine changes, a bunch of bolt ons, the 301 on E85 is now running high 12’s.
@@joequillun7790 I know the good folks from TTA , and am also a customer. Pontiac did a great job on that engine. If only they had a few more years to develop it, it would have been a monster.