Pope Francis apologizes to Orthodox Archbishop for mistakes that led to division 

What is the opposite of a religious schism? I think that happened in the day this was recorded but I don't think there is a word for it

@@Bee-tj8gc Ecumenism, communion, reconciliation.

@@crusaderACR that sounds like a slogan for an AA group lol

the problem is xatholic church is not with jesus anymore. orthodoxy is 2000 years the same not changed.

@SIMPSON Bart Oh were already in the true faith... You guys gotta accept biblical doctrines of the immaculate conception purgatory and the filioque. Does not matter if it was "added" without the eastern bishops consent its still the truth...

Amen

@SIMPSON Bart Yeah the truth: Catholic... ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-WCURDSRz6D0.html

@@bdsferno5083 romans followed old catholism Not orthodox lol and orthodox never won a single war on their own, they only lost while we to this day kik muslims assess

@ThxGod It'sOver go away troll

@ThxGod It'sOver Egypt is practically part of the Middle East. It has had closer ties to it and Europe than it ever did to Sub-Saharan Africa.. Also the Egyptian language belongs in the same language family as Semitic, very different to Sub-Saharan African languages.

@ThxGod It'sOver What is this copy-paste BS? who colonized Egypt? The people there now are the same race as the people in ancient times. Following the Arab conquest of Egypt, they only lost their religion, nothing more. Egyptians continued speaking the Egyptian language up until a few hundred years ago when the Ottomans took it over, then they fully adopted Arabic. I think I know what you're trying to get at here and the ancient Egyptians were not black.. this is pretty evident. Also when ancient Greek explorers came, they didn't encounter any black people until they reached Ethiopia, which at the time, just meant anywhere south of Egypt. Look up the origin of the name "Ethiopia" and you will see what its name means. It would make no sense for it to have this name if Egypt was black too.

Peace be with you. 🙏

What has that have to do with anything. Christians are as free to practice their faith as they like as long as they do not go within the boundaries of politics and I am no supporter of the CCP in fact I am as critical as you are

It's time for the BODY to live HOLY again. Make peace with all men and without holiness no man will see God . Saint Peter

The body will always be one because the body was never a church, but Jesus' collective people/followers. The church of Christ is not a place or organization. Matthew 23:8-11

@@Aethelvlad I agree with you in an essential aspect, but do not forget that Christ came to spread the knowledge of the Kingdom of God. A kingdom has a King, jurisdiction, law, hierarchy, ministeries, due process, tradition, an official language, a capital, history... It has a FOUNDATION IN STONE. That foundation is the Authority given to Peter and the institution of the Papacy. If you believe in the Bible, you must necesarily believe the church that MADE the Biblical Cannon was INSPIRED. And that church, that took 400 years to make the Bible a reality, had a Roman Sede, marian dogmas, eucharist, altar and the once and eternal Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. It's understandable it takes time and hard work to understand the Christian faith and it's history, but rejecting knowledge and neglecting research to preserve our bias (or because of lazyness) won't be a valid argument during judgement day. The revelation warns of a False Prophet and the prostitute, and it clearly symbolices the Roman Catholic Church. Does this mean RC is evil or false? No, it means that the False Prophet has to come from a legitimate church. Roman Catholicism wouldn't be in the BIBLE if it was just another Christian denomination. Do your research on the Early Church and read the commentaries of Saint Ignacious of Anthioch, amongst others... TRADITIONAL ROMAN CATHOLICISM (pre Vatican II council) is the perfect form of the Christian Faith. Peace of God be with you.

​@@Aethelvladwhat lies are you saying heretic human? And you called yourself Christian;

​@@AethelvladHe himself writes to the Christians of Colassa. "And he (Christ) is before all things, and all things were held together in him. And he is the Head of the body of the Church" (Colossians 1:7-8).

é impressionante que estás em todo o lado hahaha boa

Catholics are against traditionalism, so never, you're traitors

@@oosthuizen2012 uhhh, according to who? You?

I agree with your post. I would like to make clear that the church IS still One. The only issue is the Catholic Church 'left' 1000 yrs ago. However the Catholic Church is welcome to repent and return.

@@ManelvisSoares Do you have WhatsApp or fb sir? I want to talk to you about this

Indeed!

unite in the name of allah☝🏽 the true tecahings of Jesus (pbuh).

@@ایازمحمود-ع4ث Muhammed was a false prophet and enemy of God. Someone who goes by the name "Byzantine Monk" will recognize which martyr I quoted, too.

True, but uniting the 2 rites back to one Church again .. will take a lot of effort and time ... there are still lingering dregs of hate lingering on both sides and both sides should also compromise. On the other hand ... from what I know and have heard .. A Catholic can already attend an Orthodox mass and receive communion and the Latin Rite considers it valid. I dont know about Orthodox ... is it the same?

Is the Assyrian Church of the East in union with Rome?

@@jjc6101 it isn’t, Chaldean and Syriac Catholics are, my mother is Chaldean and my father is Assyrian, and we go to Roman Catholic mass often, but prefer the traditional church they followed in Iraq, there are few in the Netherlands though so it’s an issue

@@martino_yes interesting. I am Catholic myself but am weirdly intrigued by the other 3 apostolic churches. Why are some in communion with Rome and not others? Aren’t most Assyrian people not?

@@jjc6101 I don’t know the statistics but there are plenty of both Catholic and Orthodox Assyrians

Roman Catholics and Orthodox Greeks are Pagans

4No one can serve two masters: Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.

Pope Francis is looking for allies to reel in for his 'climate change' and immigration agendas. If he succeeds, it will not work out well for the Orthodox. History will only repeat itself. If you study the history, you will see that it was a very painful one, and the Orthodox suffered immeasurably. I'm Catholic but seriously considered becoming Orthodox largely because of the direction Pope Francis is leading the Church and the corruption, especially the pedophile ("Lavender") mafia operating at the highest levels of the Catholic hierarchy. Pope Francis not only shielded McCarrick but many others from prosecution. Don't get me wrong, the Orthodox have their internal problems, too, but teddy bear compared to the Roman corruption. In the end, I decided to stay Catholic because I believe the dogmas of faith to be the true, albeit it's not practiced nor taught by most of the clergy. Priests are more concerned about being liked by parishioners and not pissing off their bishops then being living examples of our Catechism.

@@titati8227 Lol many pedo priests and a corrupt cardinal (Pope Francis' close ally) was indicted. Aren't that enough to you??? That isn't humiliating the church though, it is reforming the church from the rot caused by worldly popes like John Paul II that called the death of Russians under economic shock therapy as "miracle from God" and collaborating with the neoliberal Reagan.

@@titati8227 Its good that you thought about dogma when you made the decision. It is really the most important thing when choosing papism or orthodoxy. However how could you ignore filioque? The saints who gathered to create the nicene creed, supported their beliefs by miracles and as a result we have to accept the creed of the holy fathers as the truthful one. Any addition or taking away from the creed would alter it. The Roman Catholic doctrine concerning the Holy Spirit is not as it should be. For in the original Nicean Creed (Council of Nicea 381 AD), agreed upon by the Holy fathers and protectors of God's Church, through the Holy Spirit (agreeing upon it as one and in the Spirit), it is written about the Holy Spirit: "..the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life, Who proceeds from the Father, Who together with the Father and the Son is worshiped and glorified..." Yet, when the catholic church ...changed what the creed said, and stated that the Holy Spirit " proceeds from the Father and the Son." Thus breaking the unity and equality of the Trinity by saying the Holy Spirit is less than the Father and the Son. This new saying is a heresy. For even Christ spoke of the Holy Spirit only proceeding from the Father: “But when the Helper comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify of Me.” (John 15:26) But in addition to the dogmatic issue raised by the filioque, the Byzantines argued that the word was added unilaterally and, therefore, illegitimately, since the East had never been consulted. In the final analysis, only another ecumenical council could make such an alteration. Besides, the councils which drew up the original Creed had expressly forbidden any subtraction or addition to the text. The West’s tampering with the major creedal formula of the Church is, therefore, unacceptable.

I thought the same - being catholic IS being christian, one cannot divide that.

You're definitely lost.

It is worse now than those times. Those days there was no telephone even, except slow mail. Current technology makes current hierarchy to be gods themselves, by passing all Jesus teachings and the 10 commandments. Atleast Orthodox still go with traditions where as we have bowed to satan.

@Buddy Come to this ytb channel so that we can educate you on Christendom ! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ck_86cJ_qFA.html

@Buddy The only true church is the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Orthodoc church

@@amrod4024 Both Catholics and Eastern Orthodox do believe and practice the commandments. It's the whole point ! To become new people in Christ we must abandon the ways of the world. Our saints are the best examples of this ! Colossians Chapter 3. To fallow Christ is to live by the commandments, there's no place for the lukewarm as God will spit them out, Revelation. We both believe this . Once a person becomes close to God there's no choice to become obedient to His will ( commandments ) .

@Buddy The church is not divided. The Church is one. Protestants and Roman Catholics are outside of The Church and outside of Christendom. They need to be baptized into the Church. They need to be evangelized just as the atheists, Muslims, and the rest do. Ecumenism is heresy.

I agree. We orthodox are not proud people. Apologies are not that important. What matters for us is the return of Rome to the orthodox faith and that's not yet done.

​@@srfrg9707 As a Catholic, that would be nice. A system like that in the early Church would be great I think. The Patriarchs being more like a brotherhood, with the Pope's authority being just the privilege of sitting in the nicest chair in the Ecumenical Council, and not much more than that. I feel it's unacceptable that the two most important Patriarchs in the Christian Church (Rome and Constantinople) are not together. This statement from Pope John Paul II illustrates it perfectly: "The Church *must* breathe with her two lungs"

@@crusaderACR Despite what most people think the two most important patriarchates are neither Rome and Constantinople. It's Jerusalem and Antioch. Jerusalem because Jesus promised "But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.” Acts 1:8 This means, in my modest opinion, that the Church of Jerusalem will last until the day of judgment since it will occur only after the Gospel has reached all places on the earth. Therefore any Church that is not in communion with the Patriarch of Jerusalem and all Judea and Samaria is in big trouble. The other most important is the Patriarchate of Antioch and all the East, because that's where saint Peter founded the Church. It's therefore the fist in the chronological order despite being the last in the protocol. Jesus promised to Peter that the doors of hell will not prevail but also that the last will be the first. That means that despite being the last in the protocol it is the first in God's own hierarchy and since it was the first it will play an important role in the last times. On the other hand Rome and Constantinople were the political capitals of the roman empire and that's where their importance come from rather than from their holiness. In reality the Patriarch of Constantinople has not even 4000 sheep left and is hostage of the Turks. Rome is more concerned by accommodating to the temporal world than following Christ. No disrespect intended.

@@srfrg9707 In the very early Christian Church, before Constantinople even existed, that may have been the case. But not since the First Council of Constantinople. A council recognized by the Catholics and the Orthodox, that happened in the 4th century so way before the schism. In fact, it's recognized by Catholics, Orthodox, Lutherans, Anglicans and even Calvinists! Specifically, the Third Canon, which reads: "The Bishop of Constantinople, however, shall have the prerogative of honour after the Bishop of Rome, because Constantinople is New Rome." This was indeed controversial because it dethroned Alexandria as the second, and put Constantinople right after (Old) Rome. The Bishop of Rome (the title Pope wasn't used yet) complained about the part "because Constantinople is the New Rome" which, as you say, implied the reasons to be earthly in nature, and went as far as to claim that part was added without his knowledge. Apparently it wasn't, it was likely just language barriers. Everyone complained about many things, but note that *no one* complained about it taking Rome as *first* Prerogative of Honor. In fact, the Canon *assumes* it as an established notion. In the early Church it just meant the fanciest chair in any Council is for the Bishop of Rome, and the second fanciest to Constantinople, and no powers beyond that. But it still leaves the fact: *Rome and Constantinople ARE the MOST important Apostolic Sees.* Which again, brings back the tragedy of both Apostolic seats to be divided.

@@crusaderACR "... because Constantinople is New Rome" Exactly what I said. That's protocol order, not sanctity. They are important because those were the capitals. The Roman empire exists no more. Christianity has nothing to do with the Roman empire. In Luke 22:24 Jesus told us that the temporal kings lord it over the nations and justify their authority by calling themselves benefactors. He gave that example to tell us not to be like them bur rather to be servants of each other and honor the last more than the first. You Roman Catholics are told to do the exact opposite, to submit to the Roman Pontiff because he's a benefactor (Unam Sacram). We have also many orthodox who behave the same way and need a human monarch to feel good. That's why God punished us by giving us the sultans as monarchs. The lesson was rude and some haven't learn it yet and still dream about reestablishing a new Basileus. We need to listen to Christ rather than following our own human thoughts.

I don’t think it’s that simple, Filioque was added before schism eg….also understanding of primacy was different…..

@@RPlavo The Filioque wasn't even noticed by the non Latin Churches until after the schism due to langauge barriers. Like actually, the cause of the schism was political, there were theological divdes, but they were living with them for a while, and most cropped up after. It was political.

History proves catholic actions down to expansion and increased wealth and power religious beliefs used as a excuse , its religion is all based on people never having met jesus just writings about visions and dreams becoming facts nearly a hundred years later, like Chinese whispers .

The filioque was very much noticed before the schism. Pope Leo III officially banned it being added to the Creed and condemned the Libri Carolini. The Frankish missionaries in Bulgaria were accusing the Greeks of removing it from the Creed, and the Greeks were livid. There's a reason why it was never used in Rome until 1014, when even the city fell to the demonic teachings of the filioque, which seeks to usurp the doctrine of the Monarchy of the Father. The really obvious differences arose later with the West adopting Thomism, and the Council of Lyons, etc. After that there was no doubt that we were now two separate religions. If anything is political, it's the attepmts of "reunificiation", because we can unite with Rome as much as we can with Anglicans, Lutherans, or Calvinists, that is to say, it's impossible.

@@RPlavo I think thats the least.Orthodox accept filioque with a better interpretation.But they were both selfhish.

It is, but we must be cautious. Pope Francis would love nothing more than to merge all religions into one.

Unity in truth and faith. Not for control and political gain.

@@our-days-are-short8254 blah blah blah.

@SIMPSON Bart true , but the Spirit of the anti-Christ is division and confusion ... Truly , I say to thee ... he who is not with Christ scatters ... He will gather all wheat with him and left the weeds out to ashes (I am saddened to have my protestant brothers so scattered ... basically becoming their own pope and God and created their own traditions ... they may call other protestant denomination other than them their brothers ... but in their backs they see them as heretics ... though all of them or most of them see Catholics and Orthodox as common enemy (heretic). The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of Love and Unity and of Truth

@@matthewhavemercyonmeimasin1500 The pope was a customary position. The curch is not supposed to have a singular figurehead.

@ThxGod It'sOver go away troll

YOU HAVE SAID IT ALL.REMAIN BLESS FOREVER.

@@cynthiaowusu3727 thank u🙂 GOD BLESS U😇 TOO. Your apreciation is apreciated. Tcare & stay safe in this pandemic.

Thank Jesus for having the Church survive for 2000yrs for this to happen. There's His reason to not have gates of the netherworld to prevail against Her.

I am catholic but be careful of the pope and the church lest you too my brother's and sister get influenced and turn lukewarm

What forgiveness to ask for? For the misunderstandings of the Nature of Jesus Christ.? Catholic doctrine is Jesus had both human nature and divine nature coexisting, Orthodox believe he had only divine nature. Where was Borgoglio believes Jesus had only human nature until resurrection. What is your take on that.

@@amrod4024 the Catholic and I Orthodox positions on the nature of Christ are the same and inscribed in the Nicene Creed.

@@amrod4024 We orthodox believe that our Lord was Godly human. Two natures. Why are you claiming something and not showing evidence?

Daily mail has a video of it

He was just an intolerant old pensioned off priest. There are several like him, but they don't matter.

@@theo9952 Francis is not pensioned off...

@@cosmic4037 Ι was talking about the old Greek priest who shouted at the Pope caLLing him a heretic, not of the Pope.

@@theo9952 Yes...and i was talking about an intolerant Pope.

AMEN.

I assure you think is only a play. Do you think demons are dumb? 80% of the world if not more are not religious, exactly because of demons

Wake up! He is the evil!

Lol. Why would the devil oppose him when he’s doing the devils work.

How do you find this to be humility and sincerity?? Words are easy to say. He has no deeds to show

There is no unity with heretics. Watch at the sign on the chair in front between them when they sit. As long this sign there has any meaning the papacy and cathoolicism will be less worth than shit.

Exactly. Return to Ortodoxy...

@ThxGod It'sOver go away troll

No. Oecumenism is evil. Orthodox should stay away from catholicism.

@@edwardsedwards796 While every opinion is respected considering the circumstances and background... One thing is for sure past holds us back from the future that is full of hope... Love and prayers ❤️❤️❤️

@@vcerocks3287 This is not an opinion. You are trying to defend the evilness of oecumenism. Shame on you.

@@edwardsedwards796 There is no shame in defending our future... But as mentioned before... We are all entitled to our opinions... Love and prayers ❤️❤️❤️

Not at all. Looks like you have stockholm syndrome for the EU. More baseless unity will fix the trouble of the last bout of baseless unity.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FS_Y5ujQNxM.html

@ThxGod It'sOver go away troll

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FS_Y5ujQNxM.html

How are the Protestants and Catholics one in Christ?

That is heretical non sense. We are not all one in Christ.

@@MrWesford We aren't. They are dreaming.

@ThxGod It'sOver and where did they come from, before they were in Egypt? The land of Canaan, The middle east.

The catholic church back then was wrong though. They decided to divide the church to two for geopolitical reasons and let Christians of eastern Roman (aka Byzantine empire) fall to the muslim conquerors when Constantinople fell. And all of that in the name of pride and power of the Catholic church.

Yes, to acknowledge whats wrong and humble enough to ask for forgiveness is first step to healing and reunite. May the body of Christ united.

@@johnkkin9230 It's not because of geopolitical reasons, it's because of liturgical rites that split the church. If one do not know church history be quiet and pray for providence.

@@DesiSm-nz1sr that was the execution not the real reason behind the split. History has spoken about the real reason and it is the Catholic dominance over western Europe and overseas

@@johnkkin9230 The pride of the Carolingian dynasty first. The pride of Rome later.

Yeah,Amen

You are kidding?

@@anonymoussource701 No!!! +t+

@@lonniestoute8762 Bergolio is a commie )(*&

@AVRO filmvideo If you wish to ridicule me. Please call me by my proper name. Yes I am sniffing something. Just as Jesus breathed into the nostrils of the disciples, and they were filled with the Holy Ghost, He has breathed in my nostrils also. Praise God

@@anonymoussource701 Jesus and the early Church resembled "commies"...." All things in common"".. It seems most all Religious Orders and the Church herself are " community" or "communal". He seams on tract by me. Would you rather the Pope be Democrat?? Lol....are you infected with Democracy and think the Church should operate under a " worldly government system?? Keep Calm and Catholic on.

maga idiots are not christians. they should start worshipping him.

@@sagkoenigin you calling someone a idiot is also not Christian and should repent before the lord.

@@sagkoenigin leave me alone and you are idiot I do not love you so much muslim.

@@greenlightstudio5302 I'm Fanatical Christian and Catholic I do not love only muslims.

@@anlerden4851 learn English mr. El stinko.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FS_Y5ujQNxM.html

JESUS says Sabbath is holy POPE says Sunday is holy The WORD say the 7th day is holy. The WORLD says the 1st day is holy 7th day Sabbath = (Exodus 20:8-11) 1st day Sunday = (Mark 7:7) WHO DO YOU OBEY 🤔??????

@@protestant7778Jesus, who rose on Sunday. Since Jesus fulfilled the law of the Old Testament, Sunday is to be the replacement of the sabbath on Saturday as The Lord’s Day.

Actually the translation is good, it really says "many catholics", *so* many catholics" in Italian would be " *così* tanti cattolici"

@ThxGod It'sOver O

Come and pray for this brother, please ! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ck_86cJ_qFA.html

We don't seek accommodations for us but orthodoxy in Rome itself.

@@srfrg9707 Our theology is perfectly orthodox (in lower case). The differences we have do not break any of the verdicts done in the Ecumenical Councils before the schism. How we should approach this is to tolerate these extra things that do *not* go against Church orthodoxy. Does Immaculate Conception go against any Eastern Orthodox council? It does not, because it isn't even mentioned. So let's leave it as an aspect of a Particular Church, and if it is ever considered really important, we could just arrange a Council with everyone present, Eastern Orthodox included, and we go from there. Personally, I don't see any particular dealbreaker. Edit: Papal Primacy might be a dealbreaker. Oops. But I have a few ideas. One is to make a council (where both West and East attend) to make it so Primacy gets limitations/restrictions within the jurisdictions of the other Patriarchs, and keep it just for the Western Church.

I'm a Roman Catholic and I love the eastern churches in communion with the Holy See. Sometimes I go to their liturgy. We love you!

So far I've mostly seen the Orthodox attacking us Latins about being heretics. Are we reading the same comment section?

@@tiagorodrigues3730 quite true, while we love them and try to not offend by calling them heretics, they often reply by bashing and insulting us. By their fruits you will recognize them. Just hope in those who don't insult and hate us.

@@JohnDoe-uw9nq and by their fruits you will know their works. We recognize hertics. Us bashing is pointing out truth and exposing evil as it says too. Not ecumenism with evil here. Better to have be killed or have heads cut off like the Greek monks on Mount Athos in 12 century for not "converting" to catholicsm by the sword.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1zN7J64IeBo.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE--M5d0gl2agY.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-PnQ3Ciorvjo.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pLBE1qr-Z1w.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BNyPeLIhNCo.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1zN7J64IeBo.html

cathelics are pagens they not real christans , I am egyptians and we have oldest form of christan orthodox belief coptic Christianity and it look nothing like catholics

@@sakurakou2009 pagans lmao.... read the catholic catechism before you judge

Jesus is the only way to the father Abba

@@talatofimisi7955 so u don't pray for others? And others don't pray for you?

ANTI CHRIST IS MORE APPROPRIATE 👍 THE FACTS AND REALITIES ARE SELF EVIDENT 💯 BOTTOM LINE - BUDDHA SAID : “THE SUN ☀️ THE MOON 🌙 AND TRUTH CANNOT BE HIDDEN “ 💪🏼

Such a difference between an Orthodox bishop welcoming a catholic bishop brother; tough, they are not in communion with each other; compared to the anger and resentment from an sour priest.

@@ernestpadilla9095 That’s Fake News 📺 for the gullible 🐒 The old priest can see thru 👀 the Hypocrisy 👺 of the Anti-Christ 😇

@@ernestpadilla9095 truthfull priest

@@anonymoussource701 . I don't answer with anonymous source. Why not give your name ?

You said said it.!

Umm i Just wamt to be clarified because How can Jesus be head if His church is His bride? And what can you say about the apostolic succession

@@glennhollier7562 Yes yet history tells that peter lead all the apostles and Untill to this day through apostolic successiom outcome is the Holy priesthood

@@glennhollier7562 Peter denied God but Peter ask for forgiveness Therefore Jesus forgave then Untill this day Pope has errors But still ask for forgiveness

@@glennhollier7562 Ephesians 5:22-33, Chruch can be a structure a Temple of Worship but Us can become A church and our Body is our temple

Most likely the former

CIA hard at work.

My guy’s let the Catholic Church take over his mind😂

Understand that ortodoxes absolutly dont like catholicism, in orthodoxe countries there is very small amount of protestants and catholics, in russia for exemple, you only can find 0.1% of protestants and catholics out of 99.9% of orthodoxed

@@orangecobraEU not true I see many orthodox bishops ans patriarchs having excellent relationships with Rome

@@rodolforivera7083 there is protests against catholics in orthodoxe countries

pope francis???Pope Leonid I!!!

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FS_Y5ujQNxM.html

Orthodoxy IS The Catholic Church.

take heed that no one deceive us for many for many shall come in my name

@@MrWesford im sorry but who rejects the position of St Peter that was clearly stated in the bible?

@@CopperheadAirsoft Peter's faith in Christ and acknowledgment that Jesus was the Christ was the rock upon which the Church was founded. Not the person-hood of peter nor his official position in Rome.

@@CopperheadAirsoft Pope Francis is a luciferian communist.

He bemoaned the sight of the camera. Imagine what he thinks of being in the sight of God. The fool needed to read from a script.

@@keyboardwarrior6296 When it comes down to what he stands for, this Pope is as phony as a 3 dollar bill. I feel sorry for the ones that looks up to him.

@@destiny5776 agreed

Who is, "we?" Bergoglio is disgusting.

Not more important than the faith itself. Unity with the Whore of Babylon is the worst idea imaginable.

No it's not. Uniting with evil is a bad idea.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FS_Y5ujQNxM.html

Well, you just blessed all the most evil and decrepit people imaginable. So now you take part in their wrongdoing.

@@hanskloss9431 He's still the Patriarch of Rome, isn't he? The theology is compatible, is it not? Why not unite? Isn't that what Jesus would like us to do? We are sorry. There are over a billion of us that want nothing but reconciliation, to leave the past behind and continue where we left off.

"One Church to rule them all. One Church to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them." Bergoglio, the Pacha-papa.

Not true at all. It's not about Francis, it has been official doctrine of the Catholic Church to focus all its efforts into unification and dialogue for 70 years now. This stuff began with Pope Paul in the mid 20th century. Let me stress this: It is *doctrine.* Francis has no say on the matter anymore (not to say he would complain), he must seek by Church consensus a union within the Christian Church.

It is impossible to unite two completely different churches in spirit.

We are not the same in faith. We have different dogmas. To be truly unified, someone has to give up theirs. No option.

Because misstakes were commited by both sides. and he apologized for the catholic ones

Your arrogance, lack of respect and stupidity are typical for catholics.

orthodox have never apologised because they have too much pride (a sin!) @@voievod9260

One of the problem is that St mark of Ephesus was totally wrong about the Filioque in the Florence Council

@@ernestpadilla9095 No, he was not.

@@Neo-dl7ts . Do you want the list of the Fathers of the Church that believed in the Filioque. ?

@@ernestpadilla9095 RCC's failures and inconsistencies are innumerable.

@@keyboardwarrior6296 . Can you please send me photo of your University Masters degree in Teology. To see if you really have a good support in what you say. I'll accept degrees from any orthodox or protestant college or university; as long as you don't have a masters degree from some of those evangelical churches; from where they give you a title or degree as long as you can prove them that you know how to read and write and that you have enough hate against the Pope and the Catholic Church. I'll take Lutheran schools or episcopal among others.

The catholic church is Babylon and the mother of harlots this is what the book of Revelation is saying,study your scriptures,Christ had no affiliation with any Sunday church,He kept the sabbath,as a matter of fact His warning to us is come out of this babylon beliefs and practices.

@@anointedone4775 love it wen ignoramuses regurgitate the same old protestant vomit. The whole world can see it!

one world religion = communism

@@anonymoussource701 yeah under americas leftists media including kameltoe harris's puppet sleepy brandon

absolutely right, moreover he is the best friend of the Muslim Community. He is the reason I left the catholic church...

"One Church to rule them all. One Church to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them." That's the Church of Bergoglio, the Pacha-papa. Traditional Roman Catholicism is the way to go, because it is what this spawn of Satan hates the most.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FS_Y5ujQNxM.html

The Catholic church has nothing to apologise for.

@@djf5069 I mean they have plenty to apologize for. If your talking theology wise then apologizing from a doctrine findings it primary origin in Charlemagne would be nice.

The Catholic Church should stop protecting child abusers & using the legal system to stall justice....300k children abused in France over 60 yrs, how many countries have the same story, and how long have Catholics been wilfully abusing children, 500-800 yrs? But thanks for your meaningful commentary. LOL

that's a very sikh name for a christian

It has been declared as an infallible dogma by the mother church so sorry, it is you who needs to add the filioque.

@@krimbii imagine thinking that the universal synodal 700 year old creed established by the 5 patriarchs together can be changed by 1 patriarch alone then excommunicate the other 4 for not accepting his innovation. It’s not a coincidence that all 4 of the Eastern Patriarchs Reject this foreign addition as something they did not receive from the apostles.

@@diegobarragan4904 The Catholic Church is not solely a church of men, it's a church governed by God. Either you believe the church is guided by the Holy Spirit or you don't. Either you believe Jesus Christ is the head of the church or you don't. God would have never let the church be bound to a dogma that is not true. There was a reason that the filioque was added which was to combat heresy at the time. So extra knowledge was added to the dogma to combat this heresy. It's really not that crazy of an idea. Even the eastern churches that have come back into communion with the Holy See don't add the Filioque to the Nicene Creed. Saying that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father is okay. Saying the Holy Spirit proceeds from both the Father AND the Son does not contradict the previous statement, it is just more knowledge.

@@krimbii when you say church you mean the see of Rome. That’s not what the Church is. The Church is the body of Christ, not symbolicly but in reality mystically. The church was never isolated to Rome. So we say that the church never defected, but has always preserved the apostolic doctrine in perfect purity. It’s Rome that literally cut itself off from the unity of the church by going off on their own to change the very creed that unites the faith of the Church. Rome defected from the Church, the Church itself never lost its oneness and purity. And you contradicted yourself , first you said that we have to add the Filioque but then say that the Uniates don’t even add it into their creed. Rome doesn’t care about oneness of faith, only about submission to the pope. That’s why Nestoriaus is allowed to be venerated within the Catholic Church now

@@krimbii :|

Like the priests talking politics. Oops