Prince Charles seeks Queen's approval to marry Camilla - The Crown Season 6 

And yet she allowed that harpy to be Queen consort 🙄

​@@wickedwitchoftheeast88 Charles remained with his one true love Camilla ❤❤. Diana took her married boyfriends to Kensington Palace. I feel bad for their innocent wives and children! Diana was a SLOB! It makes me wonder if Charles was a butcher or a baker or a candle stick maker would "lady" Di have married him? No! She wouldn't even have noticed him! The same thing about Waity Katie and William. Carole Kardashian Middleton pushed her daughter with William! Another loveless marriage - hence Rose Hansbury.

No, we can't agree. It is so easy to judge. And yet none of us are perfect. We are trying to get on with our lives and deserve love❤

@@hinahinananoha7783 Well said!! I also think that the queen is in no position to judge extra marital affairs. The queen was very close to both Lord Patrick Pinchett of Northern Ireland and England's Lord Porchester. 😢

for sure. Charles, as usual, thinks only about himself.

QEll did no such thing and Camilla was not on the scene until the marriage was over and Di on her bodyguard.

@@honestea1828 No, Camilla was well there even when Charles was marrying Diana. Stop whitewashing Camilla...no one was completely blameless there.

@@Coryraisa She was at the wedding. Her husband was working the wedding. They were both friends with Charles. William and Harry had old girlfriends at their wedding. NONE of them were having affairs after married. Even Diana's own accounts from the early 1980s was different from the narratives she tried to paint in the 1990s. Di and otr security staff confirm she was first to stray.

​@@CoryraisaI think the other commentor meant that Charles didn't cheat on Diana with Camilla until Diana cheated on him first. As Diana herself admitted that she cheated first and it's also a known fact that Charles paused his romantic affair with Camilla after marrying Diana and only resumed when Diana had an affair with her bodyguard.

@@ellevillamor4454 No, Charles cheated first. He was having flings with Camilla and Kanga early in their marriage. Stop whitewashing Charles and stop villainizing Diana. Neither one of them were blameless.

Camilla wanted to marry another man then and did. Charles didn't even get a chance. To his credit, he did try to get her to call it off to no avail. Ftr, Camilla was quite attractive and would have received and built on the good will customary afforded to Royal brides.rathe than right hypocritical, projecting Diana's inaccurate portrayal of her and the situation. The bottom line was neither Diana nor Charles should have married each other.

Charles and Camilla would’ve been fondly viewed as star-crossed lovers kept apart by family if Diana hadn’t been one of the most charismatic people to walk the earth.

@@honestea1828 she was never ever attractive.

It’s not quite as simple as that though. The Royal Family had stringent rules for who the heir to the throne was allowed to marry. She had to be an aristocrat and preferably someone without a “past”. Camilla was a commoner who’d had several serious boyfriends. The Queen would not have approved the match. It was only after almost all her children went through divorces that she relaxed the rules.

@@stephaniequinlan8988 There certainly were pressures and expectations at the time but the truth is Camilla wanted to marry another man then even though Charles tried to get her to call it off. His tried then and certainly stood by her decades later. It is unknown if QEll would have approved the marriage in 1970s as the option was never even presented to her.

Well... love is blind?

I don't recall any of those elements disappearing after season 1 though

@@frname7665it kinda went away after season 2

Prince Philip and Queen approved Diana bcz she was a virgin and Spencer, nothing more than that. Btw, rest of the royals have been involved in way more charities than Diana.

Diana was considered a brood mare by all of them, not just Charles.

@@kate_cooper Prince Philip actually wrote a letter to Diana expressing his utter disbelief at the prospect of leaving her for Camilla.. After all he always pointed out his son's inadequacy, also the fact that he died on their wedding anniversary is serendipitously morose ..

Good lord, what a ridiculous take. Nobody viewed Diana that way. Certainly not Charles. People really need to get over the fact they got divorced. They weren't happy together. I really do not understand why people are made at Charles for pursuing happiness.

@@jasonkoch3182 Some people refuse to move on from the fact that a so called Real Life Fairy Tale was anything but that, or that people can and do move on from divorce and/or death of (ex-)spouse.

You really don’t know what you are talking about. This show isn’t a documentary. Remember that

Back in those days, it wasn't that simple. Camilla "got around" back in those days, it would have been scandalous for the heir apparent to wed a non-virgin.

She was married to someone else. Charles was not her first choice nor did she love him that time. He was just her side puppy.

Camilla is a social climber. She had been bouncing back and forth between Andrew Parker Bowles and Charles for years. She wasn't going to "fight" for anything--she ultimately is loyal only to herself

It was a different time. Sadly it caused so much heartache

Camilla had already been in a 7 year on-and-off relationship with the more mature APB before young Charles even briefly ame on the scene. They were all different people then than 5, 10, 15+ years later (and she learned after-the-fact that marriage did not quell APB's philandering as hoped. It's precisely why most schoolage, May/December, and young unions don't last for the long haul. People are capable of loving different people at different points in your life and sometimes even more than one person at one period.

You could say the same for Charles, its best to hold your judgements aside as you weren't the ones in their shoes when they made life-altering decisions at young ages

Camilla has always just thought of what's best for Camilla and used whatever was available to get it .....

@@deniseball7764 You obviously know nothing.

@@deniseball7764you’re spot on

lets hvfe a good look at you shall we.. how good looking are you.. or not? What a shallow person you definitely are.

no she wasn;t. she LOVED her children and is on record saying she loved him then.. so that is hardly the callus description you hae jut put on it. You were NOT in the bed now. were you? Donl be so utterly horrible to someone.. and by that I mean the late Princess.

@@mariahoulihan9483this isn’t an insult to princess di it’s an insult to the crown and how they treated her.

@@cjevans3640 rubbish. what the hell do you know? your head is filled with mis information.. sorry to say. How is it an insult to the Crown.. lol.. its an insult to the late Princess of Wales to say that about her having her children.. Likening her to an animal. Shameful language.

Bcz the RF chose Diana for Charles

@fahimfaisalmahir567 though diana and queen didn't see eye to eye . Elisbeth did care for her in a way

​@@Indy44636 the queen DID care for Diana but did Diana ever care for the queen or the rest of the royal family? Diana was enormously ungrateful!!!

I dont think she liked her much by the end. She was sorry for her and tried to hlep but she found Diana impossilbe@@JoanMorrison-vq2jc

I think the Queen was a bit put off by Charles description of Camilla's behavior as heroic. None of the people involved showed "heroic" behavior.

It all goes with the talent of the actress... Imelda Staunton was the best actress to play HM the Queen.

This would never, ever have happened in 1981. Diana even had to undergo a physical exam to prove her virginity. The Queen or the church would never have consented to Charles marrying a divorced woman with 2 children. Your scenario is engaging in presentism and not recognizing the stark reality of his choices as Prince of Wales in the 80's. He had to marry a vjrgin, period. Camilla was far from that.

Exactly. He could've done what he wanted and they would've had to accept it, or else he could've abdicated and been happier with Camilla much sooner, and Diana would've been spared dealing with the royal family.

@@autumninthewoods4522You ppl talk as if abdication is something regular. It is a taboo for the royal family.

⁠@@fahimfaisalmahir567Notice it’s ONLY taboo for the British Royal Family. For the other royal houses, abdication IS truly an option if they don’t like the rules. Or if they want out after a time. Simply give up their claim to the throne. They don’t exactly see it as a birthright to be held hostage to. The same way the Brits do. They will do what makes them happy. They see being king or queen as just an occupation, a real job. NOT something they’re entitled to. The British are always far too dramatic about the whole thing.

@@destinywhite2063Their positions are fixed by their birth. So it is their birthright to wear the crown or to be in the line of succession. To choose retirement is a luxury which they are not allowed to enjoy. Unlike other occupation, a monarch's boss is God himself and He decides when it's the time for retirement. Monarchy will get destroyed if they sway away from the traditionalism. British monarchy's strength is their strict adhere to rules. Everything has to go by the rule book and that's how they have survived for so long. The thing is Monarchy has to be dramatic, full of magic and mystery; otherwise, what's the point of having it.

He did his best to marry Camilla, but he was given so little control. Why are so many so judgmental, is beyond me😮

@@hinahinananoha7783 The stigma of cheating and affairs is well documented and there are many, many victims over the centuries. The judgement is well understood. It is to the King and Queen's credit that they understood that, especially after Diana's death. Accepting that they'll always be judged is how people can accept them, even forgive them. But acceptance and forgiveness are a choice made by the one who judges. It's for their own piece of mind, not the King and Queen's. I've made my peace with what they did by accepting it. I'll never forgive the cheating, but I accept it. Love is never easy and as much as it is worth to have it, love can still destroy lives and hurt others. Their story surely proves the point.

Charles never proposed to Camilla 25 years earlier, though, so the Queen had nothing to regret (except for raising such a dithering, petulant, self-centred prat of a son). Their romance had never been serious till he took up with Diana, to whom he offered the gratuitous insult of allowing Camilla to “vet” her for him. That was nasty.

I'm not sure if you meant it figuratively or literally, but if it was literal, the crown did not come before motherhood. Charles was born in 1948 and she acceded to the throne in 1952. If you meant it figuratively, well, I have no argument with that.

@@R.J._Lewis In the figurative sense yes that was what I meant. But also thank your for the literal reminder too LOL. I just always wonder if KG6 could have lived another 10 to 15 years, Charles would have been at least a teenager by the time his mother ascended the throne, if things would have turned out differently.

Diana was good at concealing her issues to a point. Lady Femoy later apologized to the QM for not disclosing such.

​@honestea1828 I'm glad there are people who acknowledge that Diana had issues. Charles was not good in the marriage, but Diana was no saint either, both were very incompatible for one another.

@@ellevillamor4454 I'm sick of hearing that she was no saint; we are all well aware of that by now. Had Charles stayed away from Camilla and tried to make his marriage work, perhaps Diana would not have cheated, either.

@@autumninthewoods4522 actually it was reported that Charles paused his affair with Camilla just after marrying Diana and that he only rekindled relations after Diana cheated on him first with her bodyguard. Diana also confirms this as she admitted in an interview that she cheated first in the marriage. And witness reports from people who worked with Charles and Diana actually said that Charles did a lot to try and please Diana from firing staff just because she didn't like them, distancing himself from his friends again just because she didn't like them, and to even getting rid of his long time dog just because Diana disliked pets. Apparently, Charles also tried to get Diana professional help for her bulima, but she would refuse. Eventually, Diana began cheating with her bodyguard and Charles, who had enough, rekindled his relationship with Camilla. Look, I am not defending Charles or his infidelity because he was far from the ideal husband, but to say that he didn't try to help Diana would be an overstatement. Diana herself, was also reported to be a difficult wife and she cheated on Charles with many men, including married men, which as a result broke several marriages. Again, I am not defending Charles, but if we are to look at the situation from a bigger picture, both sides of the marriage were unfaithful and just ultimately not a good match for each other. They had different likes and a huge age gap for one. When I first learned about the whole issue, I was quick to dislike Charles as well, but knowing what I know now, they really were just not suited for each other and to blame Charles solely for how the marriage ended would be an injustice.

@@ellevillamor4454 That's not true. He was engaged to Diana, was fucking camilla, then post wedding avoided camilla for a time, but they were still fucking. He only had sex with diana once every 3 weeks until harry was born. She says this herself in the peter settlin tapes on camera, never knowing it would be released to the public after her death. Monarchies are retarded. Being 30 and dating a teenager you don't even like is even more retarded. No one forced the monarchs into anything. It's just idiocy the whole bit of it. Why anyone feels bad for them is beyond me when people in the world have real problems. They'll all (monarchies) die out eventually.

Camilla had always been willing to behave more like what is expected of a monarch's spouse, though she is less "showy" than Diana. Kate Middleton seems to have struck a happy medium; she's admired by the public (and does things like going down a slide during a visit grinning her head off) but she's also not someone who wants her life across the tabloids (as recent events have shown.) Whether Diana would have revealed that sort of thing to the public could only be speculated.

Camilla didn't do that though

@@j-mshistorycorner6932she was was willing participant. She could have backed off, and insisted that Charles be divorced first. I’d she the sole reason for the mess? No, but she didn’t exactly try to step away from it.

​@@elite_artist351She wasn't in it until Diana was already straying. He couldn't get a divorce until QEll approved it which, in trying to save Monarchial face, was a decade late.

How convenient of you to leave out that the one who broke the home was the wife they arranged for him who slept with several men, broke up MULTIPLE marriages ASIDE HER OWN, and trauma-dumped on her teenaged son. But sure, it was all Camilla and Charles' fault. Saintly Diana could never do wrong...

it was not at all clear if charles could be divorced in hte 1980s@@elite_artist351

....and the true Queen really !!!!

@@IMP1963 Agreed

@@IMP1963 You would have to know nothing about diana to think that.

@@rorythompson5410We know enough about to know that was done wrong. She was surely no Camilla the wicked homewrecker

@@inmyelementblue7186 You know even less then the first poster diana had like 7 affairs during the marriage most of them married men, in fact the relationship with camilla was paused for years until charles and dianas marriage started to break down and then diana broke her vows first get a clue, her house was referred to as the revolving door for christ sakes. diana was a home wrecker far more then camilla ever was.

How can you love Diana and feel any love for Camilla and Charles relationship? If Charles really loved Camilla then he wouldn't have married Diana and Camilla would have divorced Andrew if she loved Charles. But if they did that then Charles wouldn't be able to become king and Camilla wouldn't be the queen. They wanted it all and they didn't care about hurting Diana at all even though she walked into this mess at 18 while they were both in their 30s.

@@kca3346 Because we are all human beings. And we act like assholes during really serious parts of our lives. Charles and Camilla carrying on does not reflect on the kind of people they are in their jobs as king and consort and they are obviously absolutely devoted to one another. Diana was not an angel herself and gave as good as she got. She was still a wonderful human being who did a lot of wonderful things in her life and so have Charles and Camilla.

@@kca3346 exactly ... they smugly played Diana

@@xxwhispersxx2856 nope .... nope nope.... cannot respect loose morals

​@@xxwhispersxx2856💯👍👍👍❤

You had me in the first half, not going to lie

So very sorry for your loss! This must have been very difficult for you honey. Your father won't get anywhere in life being this way! But you move forward and be your own individual !!! God bless you and good luck 🍀🍀🍀🍀 Stay strong.

By "brat" you mean Diana, right? She was the childish one who acted out and pouted when she didn't get her fantasy world handed to her an a silver platter.

You obviously don't know the true story of camilla and charles, camilla was will always reamin chalres first great love. If the royal family were strong and not stubborn, and hateful towards camilla and accepted her and talked to the shand family instead of the spencer family, where the the father is after money and has been absent to his children leaving them with nannies. Camilla would have been amazing princess of Wales and diana would have learned to love someone for her. Camilla wouldn't have know as the listless and the royal family would let always blame her. Its not all camillas fault its mainly the royal families fault for not knowing their eldest sons love interest. Eventhough he was aplayboy he still held deep love for camilla and is the shand and parle bowels parents didn't plan a fake engament in the paper it would saved everything

It’s a shame to the Church of England that Charles took up another wife and abandoned his first one. If he REALLY wanted to stay true to his role as head of English church, he’d do it four more times.

@@JWRogersPS And yet, Charles would've been the same immoral, selfish individual no matter who ended up marrying him. The reality is that Charles was unwilling to put duty above his personal desires. As long as he didn't have Camilla - whom the Royal Family was NEVER going to let him have - then he was going to carry out the same affair no matter whom he ended up marrying in the end. He should've stepped aside, as his grand uncle did, if he wasn't up to the task of putting duty first, and insisted on pursuing a relationship with a married woman.

@@JWRogersPS Also, it is the Royal Family who was in the wrong, not Diana. They snatched this very young, naïve, hopeful virgin out of her mundane, innocent life, and threw her into the very grown and harsh world of loveless marriages and affairs - and on the world stage, no less. Of course she wanted a fairytale - she was only 16 when she met Charles, and 20 when they married! How did they think it would work out - crushing a girl whose head is full of dreams and expectation at that tender age? She wasn't some old, worldly woman accustomed to major heartbreaks, disappointments, and scandal of the magnitude that she was forced to endure. And worse - Diana had more eyes on her than any other bride in history. She wasn't the first royal wife to deal with a cheating husband, but her shambolic marriage was more visible than any other marriage in history. The media was more advanced, ever-present, less deferential, more all-knowing, and more vicious than the media was in Queen Alexandra's time. Queen Alexandra was probably the last major royal wife to deal with major philandering by her husband - but it was without the incessant media coverage and visibility. Charles' affair was therefore FAR more visible and far more talked about than any other affair in history - making it all the more embarrassing and humiliating for Diana (who, again, is VERY young). The Royal Family reaped EXACTLY what they sowed with Diana. The correct thing to do would've been for the Royal Family to find an older, mature woman whom they knew would be experienced and emotionally strong enough to be content with the second life they KNEW Charles would be living as the world looked on.

Natural Police

I was around then, too. First of all, Diana was 19-20. Most young people are going to be frivolous; it's in their nature. It's called immaturity. Second, she didn't "retaliate"; she was abandoned and tried to find love with others. What was she supposed to do, sit home and pine away forever for Charles? Third, we don't know how much William heard from his mother; it's all speculation and hearsay from others. Fourth, this series is a partly fictionalized retelling with many real events and politics added in. "The Crown" is NOT a documentary, nor did the news stations and tabloids entirely tell the truth in all aspects. Fifth, as far as an age gap, there was 13 years' difference between them. Many men marry wives much, much younger than that-decades younger-and their marriages endure because they most likely have the same interests and ideals. Charles and Diana were worlds apart in every way and had nothing in common. They made mistakes because no one is perfect. Charles may or may not have had a dialogue with his mother about Camilla. Had he been a real man of courage, he would've stood up to his family even if he'd had to do what Edward VIII did; abdicate. Instead, he went through with a sham marriage and put two women and himself through hell for decades. Had he done the right thing, Diana might still be alive and be happy with someone else, and Charles and Camilla could've been happily married for much longer than they have been.

They were never in it. Camilla wanted to marry her love at that time and did.

@honestea1828 Please, they sent Prince Charles away because Camilla wasn't the sort of woman you married. She had been around the block and they didn't approve of her.

He never asked the Queen if he could marry Camilla back in the 1970s. Camilla wanted APB, not Charles. There was nothing to stop Charles marrying her, apart from the fact she had had a few boyfriends. Camilla and APB used to laugh at Charles crush on her. Camilla and Charles didnt get serious until years later after Camilla had her children and was fed up of APB's philandering.

@@rosiebottom3870 AOB was actually threatened by Charles' interest in Camilla and he soon proposed soon after Charles came on the scene. Camilla did not mock and did care for Charles but has long been hung up on the older, more suave APB long before awkward young Charles ever came along. By the time she eventually grew tired to Andrew's philandering, Charles had grown up a bit.

@@honestea1828 no, APB kept her hanging on a string for 7 years. Her dad had enough and put the wedding announcement in The Times. APB, as a 'gentleman' went through with it.

lol. Sure, "all would be well." Let's just ignore the fact that Charles never actually loved, nor wanted to marry Diana in the first place. I simply do not understand the people who seem to think Charles is the bad guy here. He had an affair. Diana had multiple affairs. They weren't happy together. They got divorced. It happens multiple times a day every single day. It's long past time for people to get over it.

@@jasonkoch3182Diana only had multiple affairs because she knew her husband didn’t love her. So she looked elsewhere for love instead. Can you really blame her for that?

diana loved charles but he did not love her.if charles and camilla had not been lovers then perhaps everything would have been ok as the queen said camillas husband left her because of her affair with charles which is why diana left charles.diana only had affairs because charles did not love her@@jasonkoch3182

Andrew PB had always been unfaithfull so...

@@marywise7661 Camilla's husband had been unfaithful to her since the day one. That's why even after marriage Camilla used to sleep with bachelor Charles. Andrew and Camilla had an open marriage. Both were cheating on each other. Btw, Charles wanted divorce from Diana in 1986 after her affair got exposed but Diana refused since she didn't want to inflict the pain of having divorced parents on her children as she had faced in her childhood. But after the Panaroma interview it was Queen who ordered both of them to tread the path of divorce.

He means complaining publicly, washing the dirty laundry in public. Like Diana did...

​@@RoPiDe ok fair but I still hate them both

​​@@RoPiDe very good point. Diana helped Andrew Morton write a book about Charles!! Diana complained non stop. A snake like Diana, doesn't have a leg to stand on.

Neither she nor.her children are interested in the throne.

Agreed. Andrew PB was known as an f-boy back in the day, not sure why she even bothered. In those circles they say the first marriage is for money/security and the second is for love. They say Diana cheated first too but I haven’t seen reliable sources on that.

Dominic is good, but the previous actor was better at making Charles "insufferable."

Dominic is a good actor but misses Charles' essence. Same with the Queen.

Good points ​@@honestea1828

Btw, this is a fiction. So, the conversations are for drama. Now how do you claim that Diana was wonderful? She was equally adulterer. It wasn't like that she was faithful, and he was the one philandering. Destroy her life? It was quite opposite actually. Diana destroyed Charles' life by refusing to have divorce initially in 1986 when her affair got exposed.

OK, first of all this is a television drama, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that reality is different than dramatic television writing. No one has any idea what he said to the queen when he asked to marry Camilla, save for Charles and the queen.

⁠@@fahimfaisalmahir567Charles’s neglect of her lead her to commit adultery. Let’s get that clear. That woman wanted her husband, but he was too busy with someone else’s wife at the time. She was only human and needed to feel loved by someone since she clearly couldn’t get that by her own husband at the time who made vows to love and cherish her at their wedding. A need we as humans all share. Not only was she lonely, she was hurt by her husband’s infidelity as well. It’s true that this is television drama, but it’s mostly based on their accounts published so far.

LMAO what ? Diana death was by caused by the paparazzi incessantly following her which was the direct result of the obsession her so called "fans" had about her private life

@@fahimfaisalmahir567 The Queen refused to let them divorce

Diana, was asked by the queen's secretary, " Did you help to write this book with Andrew Morton"? Diana said, "no" Hmmm - doesn't Diana, know not to lie?

the Queen sides with the crown. the Queen thinks Charles brought shame to it, but the moment Diana aired out her grievances in public she was dead to her as well. what the Queen would want is for them to live in their unhappy marriage turning a blind eye to each other and pretending for the rest of their lives. And that is something neither Charles nor Diana wanted.

Not at all. Hence the divorce grant and lobbying for the law changed that allowed Charles to marry Camilla who QEll became quite close to and highly honored through the years. This scene is fictional.

sided her?

there was no law change, there was no legal bar to Charles marrying a divorced woman@@honestea1828

@@honestea1828 Maybe the queen realized that Camilla was stable whereas Diana was emotionally unstable and treacherous. The queen probably also thought that Camilla was very good for Charles whereas Diana was a homewrecker with all her mental problems and married boyfriends coming back to Kensington Palace!!!

What does this even mean? You know the real guy is probably a bit busy to be on the show right?

Well said! I think Diana was with her married boyfriends at Kensington Palace and I wonder how she could hurt all those marriages and innocent wives and their children! At least Charles remained with his one true love Camilla. Those innocent wives should have given an interview or did something to shut her down! Diana was emotionally unstable and yet protected by the royal family - the same family that she almost buried!! Somehow Diana got over that part of her life. Hmmm...

how coudl Camilla not mind that she was hurting Diana and her children?@@JoanMorrison-vq2jc

It does make me think that Camilla, while wrong, seemed to take the criticism fully and never really complained in public. Charles seems to be a main problem in all of this.

dont be ridiculous. Do you not know other people who have been divorced?

Funny how the princess of eating disorder was also mistress 😂😂

​​@@joelleginger599 Very well said! Charles remained with his one true love Camilla whereas Diana was emotionally unstable and took her married boyfriends to Kensington Palace!. I feel bad for their innocent wives and children. Diana broke up 💔 a few marriages - Buckingham Palace hid Saint Diana's craziness every day! And yet Diana showed no gratefulness. She hated every member of the royal family.

she didn't hate them, and she iddn't break up any marriages@@JoanMorrison-vq2jc

@@JoanMorrison-vq2jcCharles had lots of affairs. Not just with Camilla. He also had an affair with a disabled woman who committed suicide because he got bored of her and dumped her. Do more research on the matter.

He didn't. This is fiction.

It's ok to grovel your own mother, there is no shame in it

Uncle David's ghost must have been in the Palace.

I believe he couldn't marry Camilla because she was divorced and already had a kid. The Queen (now King) is the head of the Church of England. Their "Pope". The irony is that the religion was started by a divorce.

As she pointed out in another scene, of she did not grant permission, then Charles would ascend to the throne with a mistress instead of a consort, which would damage both the church and the crown far more. At his age she was not going to keep those two apart or arrange another marriage for him.

At this point, there was nothing else the Queen could really do. He produced an acceptable heir and Diana was dead for about 20 years at this point.

I think Queen Elizabeth would have been more understanding if he hadn't tried to portray this as heroic, when it was 4 people (to include himself) behaving horribly.

Stop you're talking crap he just wanted to be with the woman he truly loved th woman everyone hates but I feel like she will soon be loved and remembered for her book club. She is phenomenal and my idol

​@@linzainib7441Camilla is your idol?! Unbelievable.

​@@linzainib7441Everyone hates? Not even most.

Diana, the pig! She took married men back to Kensington Palace - I feel bad for their wives and children - oops I forgot poor Diana was "lonely" and "hurting" two wrongs don't a right.

Diana, the SLOB!! Diana had her married boyfriends to Kensington Palace and ruined marriages and the innocent wives and children were hurt!

I don’t

I glad she never got this title she was so immature and boring

Diana, lacked sincerity and commitment for the role of princess ( especially queen ). When Diana was 19 and got engaged she was still immature and when she married at 20 where was the national out cry back then? Her own mother and grandmother warned her about getting into the royal family because she was very unstable and yet she wouldn't listen. As time goes by Diana is not 20 anymore - grow up!! She took her married boyfriends to Kensington Palace and ruined many marriages. I feel bad for the innocent wives and children! Diana was a horrible person behind closed doors!! Diana should have been grateful that Buckingham Palace hid her craziness and stifled her shannigans daily!

​@@joelleginger599 Diana was a boar ( and a bore ).

there is no such thing as queen of England and Diana was not in line for it, since she was not married to Charles

Abdication isn’t a simple resignation. It is a shame. It’s like kicking off the duty towards country and the Crown. After Edward VIII’s abdication, this word is a taboo for the RF. It’s not only in Charles’ hands to abdicate. The abdication has to be accepted by the Parliament of 15 nations he is monarch. Edward VIII didn’t abdicate by his own will. He was forced to abdicate by the parliament bcz of multiple reasons. Most important reason was his over-friendliness with that Austrian painter. Besides, the woman he chose was a thrice divorced woman; and on top of that, she was known to be a whore of Nazis who was passing important state documents from King’s red box to her Nazi lovers. People would have set fire on Buckingham Palace if that woman had been crowned as Queen.