Professor Dave Destroys Kent Hovind (Young Earth Creationism Debunk) 

Kent is a total loon

+Kore I knew I liked you for a reason.

Kore How can you claim to understand science when you believe in evolution?

Simon Bouazaza Bratsve 🤦‍♂️

all of these r/ videos allows you to make really good tldrs

😂

xD

He avoids questions better then taxes

Avoids them like a politician dodging questions

zing!

I would have told him that perhaps the singularity was the creative act of God that brought the universe into existence, and just watch him melt down

But he has “multiple degrees” and “taught science for 15 years”

Because no one actually knows what a singularity is, it's something that transcends known science, where all measurements meet infinite values. So I'm not sure what you're getting at.

@@notrecyborg5492: "it's something that transcends known science, where all measurements meet infinite values" Kent: "whatever the singularity is" You know the definition of it, you just don't know the details. Kent, meanwhile, demonstrated that he came to a debate without even a shred of understanding of his opponents argument, foreshadowing that he's not here to argue but just to yell.

The moderator is just checked out probably playing Pokémon go.

@@Robert-dt4is Nah he's ignoring the conversation and paying attention to his super chat donations.

i'd zone out as well to avoid severe brain rot

iirc he's religious which was honestly a bit of a shame to learn considering the amount of these debates he's sat through and 'moderated'. I do think he really must be checking out to ignore all of the religious/religious idea beatdowns that have gone on. perhaps his view of religion doesn't necessarily conflict with the general evidence against it but you can only really go so far with it before it gets even more made up & dishonest.

You can be spiritually religious and/or agnostic and still believe in science

Dave Dave Dave.....do they swim in wateR ? I cried

This is most definitely my favorite comment and I hope it gets more likes

@@williamknight52 You know normally I'm a comment and leave it kind of guy but it's really shitty outside in the world right now and that cheered me up, thank you.

@@PADELATOR do they swim in *ThE WatEr*

Great comment 😅

It's been on loop for over 30 years

@@DarthSinistris 30? Perhaps 1900? Cheers mate🍻

@@Obediah002 That's not what evolution is.

@Casey B oh my God you're exactly right. I've listen to the creation guy for about a minute and a half and then I thought, 'I can't even listen to this guy anymore'. And I came to the comments.

I like you sir/ma'am/non, you say things that I agree with.

dave learnt his lesson, he moved on to a better way to debate

Yes. Yes. Yes. So much.

Absolutely. You saw the last Presidential debate correct? This mess goes all the way to the top.

Actually, that may be a good analogy. Thanks for the idea.

Technically we do, at the end of puberty when our growth plates fuse we literally go to bed and wake up as an adult, although we don't look any differentiated. I'm a good example. I went through puberty a bit too early so I literally went to bed as a child who was going through puberty then when I was 9 and my puberty finished I suddenly was biologically an adult... even though I was only 9 years old. So I literally went to bed a child and woke as an adult 🤷‍♀️

@ Fiona -Jane kelly : If that is the case, then the adult in the morning is still almost identical to the child before. The different child kind Kent Hovind expects to appear is very different from the parent kind, like a mouse producing an ape. Hence, we can use the analogy of a baby turning into an adult overnight. No one has ever seen that happen. Yet there are people who believe babies can turn into adults. It's a religion, not science.

​@@snoopyjot Except you've arbitrarily defined 'an adult' to meaning someone whose skeletal structure has stopped developing. Someone else might define 'an adult' to mean someone who has turned 18, someone else might define it to mean they've started their first job, etc. The Ancient Greeks defined adulthood to be somewhere around 14, 15. Biologically a human is adult the moment it is capable of producing offspring, regardless of their growth plates. The definition of 'adult' is vague and subject to change as people see fit. This is the entire problem with Kent's argument.

@@amyseilnum3346 Because all the polar bears that didn't have white fur died. Also I don't know what you mean by "straight to", this is a process that took hundreds of thousands of years.

Even tho Kent mentioned the bible multiple different times.

@@ANTICHRISTian736 yeah, he mentioned it saying "the Bible says" but that's all. My point is Kent refused to talk about the Bible with Dave. At 19:00 Kent asks to see errors in the Bible and when Dave ,3 minutes later, says he'd like to talk about it Kent said no 21:05.

Oh god....I have to get to 19 mins to see this? I really....really wanted to watch this because Dave does an amazing job with explanations....but Kent started his 8 minutes, and I started to cry.

@Stan Gore it does not have to. Using math and research you can put time stamps on the events of the bible.

@@ANTICHRISTian736 So here is my problem with this idea. On one hand, you have a book, with many fanciful ideas like Adam and Eve living to approximately 900 years old, an Ark that was supposed to hold 2 of every animal for about a year, men rising from the dead, and so on so forth. On the other hand, you have science, where millions of people devote their lives to figuring out how the world works, using a variety of different sources, such as Ice core dating, geology, fossils, laws like the speed of light, evolution, ect, to prove the age of the earth is billions of years old. To throw another wrench into things, scientists are constantly challenging ideas that others present, checking peoples methods meticulously, or finding new information that invalidates or changes the way we see things. So, my problem is, why would I trust one source when many sources say that it is wrong? And if I could only trust one source, why should it be yours? Why not another religion?

😂

Sound's like something a 7 year old would say.

shi-ench!

Oh this got a good laugh out of me especially because I read it in his voice

I want to kiss him with my car ...

hahah i almost spit out my water at that part, just amazing.

I laughed so hard when he did this... Kent failure.

He's not prepared for that.

Was the same reason by some Christian religions control so much the study of the bible. Catholic church prohibited even to have one on your house in some periods of time. The Spanish Inquisition persecuted person just for having the book.

@jason4522 He "upheld the Bible"? What does that mean? Also, it's Loser. Looser means not so tight, like the screws that hold your brain in. Always nice to see christians go straight to insults though. Good for you. Jesus will be so proud.

Technine bows down to this man

😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣

"Funny you should mention taxes..." ohhhhhhh snap! He actually went there hahaha

For real, that opener was great in response to someone like Kent Hovind, who cannot respond to evidence or facts that accurately reflect reality. It forces Kent to reveal how much of a scheister he is. Unfortunately, Kent is a very experienced scheister and his style is likely effective on people who already share his beliefs

@@Slappy_McNasty_9090 I don't think I've ever heard an opening argument as compelling as this one...and I watch a LOT of Law & Order! 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣

@@secretsquirrel6718lol

@@secretsquirrel6718Really? The geologic column, speciation, mutations, and the other biological/scientific mechanisms are on Hovind’s side? Take a Freshman level Biology course and you’ll see how incorrect you are.

Pls tell me your as old as Kent because if you think like he does and you’re not old and stuck in your ways then that’s just sad.

@@marshill88 define gender

​@@GrantMarcello-di3qedawg what are you even saying. also, Kent is based.

It's horrifying! This man needs to be locked up. Not out of spite, he's a sad little man and I kinda feel sorry for him. But because this man is dangerous. He has and will hurt people.

Yep, the simple situation whereas you learn more you realize what you haven't learned. Just imagine if we stopped progressing past the iron age because no one cared enough to realize that there are better materials than iron. If it were up to Kent we would still be living in grass huts dying of the common cold.

exactly. lol

Except Christians are far more likely to think they know a sufficient amount about a subject they have zero familiarity with than scientists. Just like Hovind. That's what faith does to a rational mind.

@@fenrirhere The Dunning Krueger effect is beautiful

@@nastasedr Watch it. It's a good watch. :)

For real. Dude was reading chat the entire time or something

They invite people with big audiences to "debate" so they can make money off of superchats or w/e from them. It'd be one thing if they actually moderated but they're just unnecessary middle men leeching off people imo.

Thanks for that. You have a good sense of humor.

He was just playing solitaire or something

he was really into his coffee

Wait! Hold on! I'm 100% certain he also said: "I don't understand!". Sooo two for two🤷🏼

That's literally every religious person ever. You have to deny science to be religious.

Plus heroin (I read, not certain)

that makes no sense

it makes sense

he'd also be wrong about teleportation because it very much exists

@@duck6100 sure thing! every time i walk into the bar full of chicks, the next second its empty

This is perfect

Another one is you can’t talk sense into an idiot, Hovind is the proof. 😂🤣😂

I mean, if you're dumb enough, you can win, but both parties will exhaust each other

You guys keep laughing at Kent but he’s upset and in fact feels pity on you because you believe in this delusion that nothing created something. These evolution scientists always look into cells but they can’t ever explain how nothing created something. There’s a painting because there’s a painter there’s a creation because there’s a creator. Humans where created by god, don’t fall for this evolution trap. It’s simple we don’t come from sponges. No thing except for god existed millions of years ago so you cannot claim that evolution is an actual thing. Understand that the life your living is wrong and sinful but every person has a savior and that is Jesus Christ. Repent of your sins and trust in Jesus. You won’t see him but you will feel his effect, similar to wind you can’t see it but you feel it’s effect. Then your trust and belief will keep growing stronger and you will do what I’m doing, telling people the truth.

@@markboyko4538 'you cannot claim evolution is an actual thing' Sure you can, if you're referring to biological evolution. In biology, a simple, one sentence definition of evolution is: 'Evolution is the change in the characteristics of a species over several generations and relies on the process of natural selection'. That's it. It's how life on Earth works. It's demonstrated to be fact every day, all over the world. No one in history has ever demonstrated otherwise. There are plenty of geneticists and others working in the life sciences who are religious and have no problem accepting this basic fact of life. Even very devout Christians, like Francis Collins, who led the Human Genome Project, knows evolution is fact. No data or evidence indicates it isn't. You can modify some aspects of your beliefs so they align with reality, but you sure can't change reality.

@@markboyko4538 You're lying to people, and yourself. There is no divinity in this world.

I thought Candy crush

Maby because you have absolutely no idea how to debate him.

​@@lucasfox8439 *maybe

maybe*

@@nagi159 There is no maybe would you like to debate me?

@@lucasfox8439you would lose, All you have are arguments from incredulity. No amount of denial will change the fact that evolution is a scientific fact

I find them to be extremely interesting because there challenges are hard to defend ..

@@marvinhesler321 But they can be done. And thats always the most important part.

Kent Bovine has been speaking for about 12 seconds and I'm bored already. NEXT!

​@@SiegfriedDrachentoeter I wonder if you could move along the micro-macro direction by expanding or shrinking much like walking across a room, how the world would be viewed? It might look like this "realm" we are in - where things are of fixed size - is a bit like a flat plane. And prob between the most micro and most macro, Earth's in the middle. Maybe ancient "flat earth" and "earth's in the center of the universe" was profound wisdom we have lost and was actually completely, totally different than retarded "flat earth" of today - as if it wasn't a sphere. To compare only the outer shell of theories and say they're the same based on only what's observable without taking into account any of the intangibles or invisibles. Isn't that kind of like willful self-delusion?

@@SiegfriedDrachentoeter NO ..in fact no one can still prove true curvature..Period..I have heard all the silly lame arguments but still no clarity

God loves you. Romans 5:8

@@lucasfox8439 "Cats, as you know, are quite impervious to threats." -Connie Willis

“Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you will be like him yourself. A wise man will not rebuke a fool.” Bruce Lee 1940~1973

LOL @@user-DongJ That actually has it's roots in the Bible: Proverbs 26:4-5 4 Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you yourself will be just like him. 5 Answer a fool according to his folly, or he will be wise in his own eyes.

@@radudrag "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance." Kung Tzu ~500 BCE

@@user-DongJ Kung Tzu was a wise man. By the way the book of Proverbs was written by King Solomon who lived between 990 and 931 BCE.

@@radudrag - Kent Hovind knows that compare to the Flat Earth apologists, Young Earth apologists have a slightly better chance of cracking/shaking the Old Earth promoters since there are still many more unsolved/unresolved problems, mysteries, dilemmas, etc. By creating enough Fear, Uncertainty, Confusion &/or Doubt (FUCD) & attacking those unresolved problems, Dr Hovind can keep Prof Dave on the defensive & grow/keep his base of Young Earth believers. Such tactic/strategem was discussed in Sun Tzu’s Art of War & 36 Strategem. Perhaps Prof Dave should become more familiar with books like the Art of War to better counter Dr Hovind’s tactics.

Literally game set match. Best part, Kent literally did _exactly_ what Dave said he would do lmao

@@heyitzrare He had him all figured out. Kent had to resort to buffoonery and claims of imminent "whacking's". Pitiful.

@@ngcastronerd4791 Yeah, Kent had no choice there lmao

he already won there tbh

Holy hell, and then the 8 minutes he responded with was pre-destroyed in Dave's opening. Also, calling Professor Dave on par with child abusers is offensive.

Progress? Society wouldn't function at all.

@@captainlamp2.076 ok dickhead, calm down.

​@@captainlamp2.076 fr

Says James who assumes he came from a strawberry.

@@lucasfox8439 I think your brain broke bro. Try turning it off and back on. Usually fixes minor issues.

It is fascinating how at least half the time his response to any criticism ends up with "You think you are related to a watermelon" or whatever because he simply doesn't KNOW anything and his cult can't imagine that maybe scienticians know something Hovind doesn't.

Dave can't even have a civilized conversation I can see the smoke coming out of his ears and I can hear the stress in his voice typical Democrat

@@joshbrz8902Hovind can’t win a straight debate so he uses the most annoying tactics possible to antagonizing a reaction out of Dave because idiots like you can only process the simplest of physical cues, I.e. Ken make opponent mad, Ken winner! Yay Ken yay!

Kent is very very dumb and happy to be so

It’s hard to have a civilised conversation with an idiot suffering from the Dunning-Kruger effect. @@joshbrz8902

Not if the toddler is an 80 year old man who shids in a diaper

@@apolloandwarrior_3229 lmfao 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

Yes

Yeah!! 😂😂 Dave sounded like a little angry man

@@BlakeosaurusRex not angry, frustrated. Hovind's explanations sounded like they came from a 7 year old.

You have a wonderful way of explaining and communicating your ideas, but after watching this debate, I don't think Kent would be able to change his mind on anything despite the sound simple logic in your words. He likes the idea of being open to having his mind changed, but puts forth so little effort to understand an opposing idea, that I don't think it's possible

You both are very very right!! Kent is a Narcissistic liar and will not EVER understand science nor does he care!!

@jerrytyler2835 Thank you for your kind words. I agree with you about Kent specifically. His mind will not be changed as he's now too dedicated to his "side." However, there will be people watching this video who haven't yet made up their mind and this may be an aspect that they've never considered. So long as we can focus on thinking about life critically and with an open mind and heart, we'll be supporting people in developing a belief system based on facts and not emotions.

Hovind was ready to do just that for one second because his mouth moves before he thinks. He knew he would be on a loser using his "science" book.

@@jamesj2022 what in the world are you talking about? In ALL of that writing you don't actually bring a single point or fact. See, that's the issue. You spout some Bible verse and hate but your words are empty. I don't know why some Christians hate on evolution. There are PLENTY of scientists and intelligent people who believe in God AND evolution. I mean we have human history that goes back more than 5 thousand years so it's pretty absurd to think humans existed before the planet did. Believing in the facts we see in the world around us is not some attack on God. I find it so interesting how people take SOME parts of the Bible SUPER literal but then completely ignore other parts. Dyeteronamy 25:11,12 or how about levitcus 19:19 or leviticus 19:27? Or how about slavery? Do you own slaves? Ephesians 6:5 , leviticus 25:44-46... what about stoning a child to death for not listening? Deuteronomy 21:18-21... do you own more than a single shirt? Luke 3:11 ever made a crude joke? Ephesians 5:4... see I can quote Bible versus too but you'll just ignore those and say how it's not to taken literally or :"Jesus doesn't care about the old laws" ... suuurreee... look, science doesn't care about the Bible and it isn't attacking God. MEN wrote that book and it's been changed A BIT over the years so its certainly not infallible. weather U believe in God or not that should be self evident. Interesting you mention plastics in the water... bring that up in church along with climate change and let me know how it goes for you.

@@trevorduncan9580 you know. Growing up pagan I always heard the retoric of being evil and brainwashing people. Then when I gave up my faith and started looking at the evidence. Turns out I'm still evil and brainwashing people

@@jamesj2022 Biological evolution is just how nature works. If you have a problem with reality, then take it up with the creator you believe in, since he/she/it would be the one responsible for evolution. Bigotry and racism are not 'evolution things'. The science of genetics/evolutionary biology indicates we are all related. Racist hate groups like the KKK for example, often use the Christian Bible as justification for their racism. This is because they are ignorant. Like you. The good news is, you can always educate yourself. No need to take a trip to the library; you have internet access. Start learning. You don't even know the definition of biological evolution.

🤣🤣🤣

Its kinda hard to listen to

A small cost for a small amont of brain cells

So your net amount of gained brain cells are 0? I see that as a win

See. I’m in full support of religious belief (as long as it’s lifting and connected a community whilst making sure people are accepted) because I feel as though for many who find themselves lonely even with people around, it is stabilizing. And for those suffering in a hard place, it gives them someone to believe in. And it makes me sad, that people like this religious scumbag make tools such as Faith and Religious Belief non-accessible/shunned for people in my generation because they fear judgement by association with people like him.

@@silas0757 i see this as an absolute win

1:09:45 Dave was brilliant with that destruction of Kent's fantasy book club.

Obviously it was not the topic on debate, and what he did is a common debate tactic: focus on destroying the other person’s basis, which he successfully poked holes in. Apart from fossils and billions of years which have no present-day observable evidence Dave had nothing to say. I just think these are two entrenched ‘faiths’ or ‘schools of belief’ having a go at it.

@@kwasiosafo that's a really interesting tactic: use phrases that appear very neutral while simultaneously spewing bull shit in support of one position. Very dishonest, if I may say so, myself.

@@kwasiosafo but the bible is his sole piece of evidence, and he was using it at the time to defend his statements. the entire debate went like this; kent: *lies about observable fact dave: can i explain to you why that's wrong? kent: stop changing the subject understandably, dave got frustrated eventually.

@@kwasiosafo Mate you say that fossils provide no evidence for evolution. Kindly elaborate on that.

hmmm you really look like a rickroll

This Kent guy proves that stupidity has no bounds and, contrary to his argument, is living proof we are related to primates.

You’re right, professor Dave discredits himself my constantly reverting to ad hominem attacks and name calling.

@@ryangilles4837 And still some how faded kent. Amazing

@bryan Sike! Lol I'm not saying I agree with him but Kent destroyed Dave in this debate.

@@misc.2682 if by destroyed you mean "screamed over him like a child and dodging all questions". Then yes yo boy caught a body

It's like Magnus Carlsen playing chess with a cat.

Yes totally mad

boy, must you have a happy life if that's what makes you the most mad.

@@TheMiracleMatter Eh not a sad life but it just really made my blood boil for some reason.

Yeah. That was appallingly ironic.

@@weiwei-uplink I wasn't being sarcastic when I said happy life. I meant to say I experienced and witnessed so much more upsetting things than that during my life. ...And to give the devil his due, Dave also really dropped the gloves quick.

Kent begins singing the ABC's: "A, B, let me stop right now because there is no way there is going to be a Z at the end. And they teach this to children in schools?"

@@DrDeathpwnsu they’re brainwashing children!1!1!

Theyir*

@@DrDeathpwnsu Kent walks into a room and sees a cup on the ground, well obviously the cup just appeared there right before he entered the room and was definitely not set down by a dude that had to go do something real quick.

@@Railfan105. I'm flattered. I think you could improve that one though. What you need is a premise with a built-in expectation, then you can circumvent that expectation. Like put something that people know at the front, that way you're not explaining what happened the end, because you need to end to be like a surprise that pops out not one that trails off.

Answer: indoctrination from a young age or a gullible personality.

As someone who believes in Þor, I can kinda agree with you.

Excellent news.

Absolutely EXQUISITE NEWS!!! this is music to my BLOODY EARS!!!

Hallelujah!

Good to see there’s some justice in the world

@@dwaynechristophercheeke8605 no, he has faced several domestic violence charges. He likes to beat the shit out of women.

Hahahaha

Yup

24:06 this must be an end of a discussion. kent know nothing about biology this is a proof, he knows nothing about what dave asked works. thats it this is a proof that kent is nothing bore but a biggest scumbag.

By 25 minutes i have paused 4 times to take a breath as this is actively killing my braincells.

you can just feel the love in the room

Do you mean a dead end on the evolutionary tree.

​@@stephenconnolly3018 LOL

Well said

​@@stephenconnolly3018Even Paranthropus was better than this.

Probably, I wouldn't blame him lol

It is a very bad moderator....

It stops him from loosing all his braincells

@@obsidian_oki if they get too loose, they fall out.

Funny shit man, lol

Hahahaha.

Yeah and “professor” dave is going to say some book says something else. Books don’t say a thing dumb ass.

Jeremy Cox that better be a joke

@@jeremycox6471 You sir are an example that siblings can't have children without the loss of IQ.

@@jeremycox6471 Science isn't a book, it is a method. My daughter is in university and she spends countless hours in the lab. They are required to learn things for themselves and test the things they learn from books and lectures.

@siavash ghorbani Ad hominem

@siavash ghorbani that’s what kent did though?

@siavash ghorbani I mean that the comment you insulted had nothing wrong in it, because the comment was making fun of what Kent said in the debate.

@siavash ghorbani oh ok. I was just confused. I didnt know that was how weebs talked, maybe because I spend so much time reading comments from other weebs that it's become normal.

In the movie the green mile

The most funny part of the debates is James thinking he's a moderator.

​@@freddyguy8582agree😂

"You're calling the Bible a Liar"

That’s why I refuse to debate Nathan Thompson on that platform

From what I've seen, James does an okay job of enforcing rules. The problem is, often there are pretty close to no rules. So no rules, no enforcement.

That's James for you

Chris Wallace's long lost twin

James stopped after Dave started insulting Ken. Dave failed by resorting to insults, ad-hominems, & religious attacks (which he literally disavows before 2:00). No Hovind acolyte or moderate will change their mind after watching this; they'll just hear Dave name-calling (and lying about Venter at 56:00) & assume he knew he was wrong. Dave's behavior kneecaps actual, serious defenders of evolution.

He also abused his multiple ex-wives. Physically and psychologically.

@@frankinher7467 that information is as readily available to you as it is to me. Do the work.

@@frankinher7467 weirdo

@@frankinher7467 I could go into details but its just best to hear from the horses mouth, here is Cindi Lincoln, one of his ex wives, speaking about it ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tcQ52eqBtns.html

@@frankinher7467 lmao he got arrested for it in September!

Not sure what hovind could be so frustrated about since evolution isn’t against religion.

So I’ve heard this from other religious people…. I think I’m their heads we believe in science with as equally blind faith as they believe in the Bible. They don’t understand the science, data, and evidence behind what we believe so they are trying to make an argument of “we both have faith based belief.” Obviously that’s front, but I think that’s what they’re getting at…

@@jamesj2022 Okay. What specific problems do you have concerning evolutionary biology/modern synthesis? What are you aware of that geneticists and other biologists are not? What are the professional, working scientists of the world missing? You are aware that evolution is not some 'American atheist' thing, right? See, unlike religion, there are no denominations in science. It's conducted in the same way all over the world, regardless of religious beliefs, culture, language, etc. Do you know the definition of 'science'? How about scientific theory? Do you know what that means?

@@connorcoultas9629 Yep. Some people are actually incapable of imagining "no religion" so they come up with "Science as a religion". It probably doesn't help that Scientism was a thing in the XIXth century. This is why you see Creationism often talking/discussing and quoting Darwin and pointing at errors in The Origins Of Species. They think it's a sacred book of sort that Evolutionnists believe from A to Z so if things are wrong in it, then it's a false religion.

@@LeSarthois Good points. They also project in other ways, like thinking that Darwin was some kind of messianic figure or something.. Weird. Also, I'm betting that very few creationists know that Darwin thought God created everything; he wrote something to that effect on the last page of 'Origins...'.

Its because the bible is apparently "above all human scrutiny" according to some people.

That is because Kent uses the "one for me, but none for thee" way of arguing, where he brings up a point that is invaluable to the argument, until it's brought up against him, then it's valueless. My brother used to use the same way to argue with me, and it'd get me in trouble because it'd piss me off and I'd start hitting him (we're far older now and no longer violently resolve things). My brother would use it because he knew it'd piss me off, and that's exactly what Kent is doing: pissing Dave off with blatantly false and circulatory arguments so it doesn't progress or resolve, stalling until the time runs out.

"im allowed to use the bible but you arent!"

Evolution doesn't exist? But all humans evolved from two people with millions of variations. Asians Mexicans, White people etc etc.. So two people who were of one possibly 2 different ethnicities produced all the other ethnicities over time without evolving? How blind can the creationists be? Edited this post to hopefully be a little clearer.

@@Fairburne69 ah so you are going to disagree with practically every biologist on earth? with what qualifications?

Lol

@@comanche66100 you know.. There was said a lot of things you can look up....?

Most things in the bible are made up? Lol there are tons of things that are not made up thats in it. I dont know if id say most

@BladerNation thats only a few not most... not saying i disagree with you just dont like people who hate on christianty for whatever reason and if you do make sure to say accurate. Alot of things in the bible a actually happened. But prob alot didnt or didnt in a way its taken idk there are therioes on mistranslations of dates or the the idea that god is out side time so a day to him = ? To us arguement. Im more fasinated by the nephilim and the flood. Lol

@BladerNation yea i know this well. I was raised sothern baptist. I just serperate my experience with the religon from researching it and other interesting stuff like science other religons myths phrophecy. Um i dont thinking people should have a problem with the christians who have used this religon to enhance their lives but maybe find problem with god bc he says he is alpha and omega but says most will go to hell and creates us all anyway. If he is all powerful he could have done better? Thats my issue dont take ur anger out on christians but god perhaps idk .

Yea it's better to talk about that next time.evolution vs creation is important

What's wrong with sticking to thr topic.?

@@mr.liddie9479 the point is that Kent’s only evidence was the Bible, which he asked Dave to disprove, then didn’t allow said requested disproval of his only source.

@@unpopularopinion4638 did we watch the same debate just now, either you don't listen very well, or you already established that Kent had nothing to offer before the debate got on the way....

@@mr.liddie9479 yes, we watched the same debate, but I have no idea what you’re saying, all I’m saying is Kent’s only argument was “the Bible said this” and didn’t allow Dave to point out the many inconsistencies in Kent’s only source of evidence

You have to debate and argue with some people because they're spreading false information and beliefs that are detrimental to society

Those idiots like Kent not just ignore science and logic they even fight against science and logic because science and logic are foes to their medieval religious beliefs. 🤷‍♂️ The whole drama is that those idiots use technology which could not exist without the science and logic they are fighting against so hard!

What is the role of the moderator in this discussion?

@@Kroll117 well the problem with debate people like Kent is they will never accept they are the losing side then bragging to they follow about how no one able to win the debate again them. This kind of people will never change they mind no matter how many times you debate them, most you can do is hope some of they follow to watch this video and actually know how nonsense Kent is.

Buddies - I like Dave, I think he is a precise and diligent debator and subscribe to his channels BECAUSE he is worth it. However ... a lot of these commentators misses the boat. Dr Kent got it some premises right, although he has some flaws in his "debauchery". Prof Dave has it ALSO wrong, and on several aspects, BUT mostly due to each trying to overshadow the other, INSTEAD of solving the problem, ie State and provide evidence to the hypothesis, then DEBATE with a follow up on the next programme on facts, errors, ommissions. However, I understand his and Dr. Kent's thought process and believe this needs to be a series of discussions as these debates are NOT Solutionary. One debate must be on Chemistry, one on Biology, One on BIOCHEMISTRY, one on Physics evidence, One on ... are you getting the line of thought? I didn't get ANY solutions from this debate, as the REAL analysis wasn't yet discussed. They started, thats the best way to put it. However, reading some of YOUR comments Guys and Dolls ... WOW!!! If you do not get WHAT I'm trying to explain to you, You're able to CONCLUDE some preordained / pre-thought process from basically "non-conclusive evidence" Man... You're just ... Magical?!!! Your bias is NOT palatable.

That's rich coming from a religious Preacher.

Yeh classic. Then aligns himself with the church who are the biggest group of child abusers and murderers ever to have lived

Probably calling him that to fuck his reputation, and his credibility

In July of 2021 Kent was arrested for beating his wife back in 2020

"hey kid, god watches all of your movements, and if you do anything wrong you will be sent to a fire pit for all eternity" *new ability learned: anxiety!*

But the dust was alive , Kent showed me in science class, or a bad dream I had about the world getting dumber

@@qhviananan-laul5159 hahaah i hope this is troll

@@skoulikiagamwtanekrasas why would I be a Troll ? , I like billy goats . Plus it is too difficult sleep under bridges and no room for the entertainment center.

@@qhviananan-laul5159 you are it's difficult sleeping under bridges

@@skoulikiagamwtanekrasas mostly with all the damn goats constantly crossing over . I should have listened to my mom and went to Troll University. Got myself a degree in trolling from Troll U. and a trolling job in a tech company trolling, where I would troll you, but no degree you see for me so I have to let the trolling be, I'm tellin' ya G, it's not easy up this tree, for me or the, but sold out cheap, like my name was Lee, now life dips its nutsac top my head, like a bag of tea. Soon a turn for better, strike swift and silently, a pig, chanced on its way home, ham steak, anyone as I end this tome. It's on a swine I dine, you know the one that went Wheee ! Troll time peace out , didn't need Troll U. Doin' fine with a Troll G.E.D. ~ Q.

well if they went the Alabama route and a woman gets pregnant by her son, it would be her child and grandchild at the same time.........

@@Grieves0001 if only they knew

@@Grieves0001 the child would become mutated teletubby

It's normal in Alabama and west virginia

@@Grieves0001 Yes, but the key point to understand here is that the grandchild is not the son of the grandparent. In this context the child cannot be both.

Is that actually true? That is hilarious, I love you for this information right now. XD

I laughed so hard when i heard that. The scammer was scammed by his own son bwahahaha! His son also remade all of kents videos 😂😂😂

@@johnnyapplesmith Some people get away with murder too, does that mean everybody should?

@@johnnyapplesmith random, john apple ive seen ur other comments u seem like an intelligent individual

Saw telltale's video on this. Good stuff lol

😆😆😆 agreed.

He was teaching a pig to sing.... Frustrates him and irritated the pig

Thanks for the warning. I'm outta here after 2 minutes.

Kent Hovind is a lolcow.

Don't insult pigeons like that.

Just through my bible away. Thanks Kent for educating me.

It is indeed ironic

Him accusing someone else of child abuse when he’s a convicted domestic abuser and allowed his friend to abuse children at his resort is… awful

every accusation made by right wingers is secretly an admission of guilt

It would be funny if their indoctrination wasn't so dangerous for the good of society.

I'm so sorry to hear that. That must have been tough. I was the one asking questions in Sunday school

Lmao I feel you , mom would force me to go to church and church school. I would constantly debate with her. To the point, she took me to a preist to argue against lmfao

Damn you must have good debating skills, because once I bring up something about god my parents just beat me up 😢

That must been rough...

Just a bit of advice, anyone claiming to be intelligent is never actually intelligent, 10 out of 10 times.

Big time

the 10 year old being Dave. p.s: I believe in evolution and I'm an atheist.

I don't think so, I think Howind is an intelligent and professional, well-trained liar.

@@JulianThursday13 riiiiiight. You must have been watching a whole different debate than this one. In fact, I've come back to watch it multiple times, because I enjoy it so much. And I must say, there is no way in _~bleeping bleepety bleep~_ that anyone could call Kunt the Fraud "Einstein" with _any_ level of actual honesty.

@@JulianThursday13 I understand, easier to understand the lier that teaches children. You just don’t understand.

Yeah he gets away with that garbage because James coddles and protects him. He's usually a decent moderator but never with this clown

He also has a bridge to sell

Kent tryna dodge it like in the matrix

Creationism in a nutshell.

And the thickass brick wall poorly disguised as a human

you can't make this stuff up 🤣🤦‍♂ pain, agony even

It's really funny that Dave lets Mr. Hovind criticize evolution textbooks but when Dave tries to criticize the Bible Kent says "we're not here to talk about the Bible" Smh

half the people tht say this dont even read the bible, lol. it says to not eat pork, get christians still do

@@zesu09 actually thats for Hebrews and Muslims as Christianity has different values from the 2 other Abrahamic religions and Modern Christianity is a decendent of just one sect mainly Nicean Christianity, there are others like Arian Christians, Gnostics, Cathars ect that have been in one form or another simply disappeared either violently or peacefully converted, in fact the 1st Christians are likely just hebrews that just believe Jesus is the messiah and still practiced the Hebrew traditions and practices.

Criticising and Interpreting the Bible is literally what Priests and Preachers do. In fact literal sects form based on certain interpretations.

Bingo!

lmao

Kent is a Huckster. Even his debates are scripted. If you've seen one, you've seen them all. That's why he's scared to speak outside the realm of the topic. You'd think someone making a claim about the Bible being un-foul-able, would actually talk about it.

That’s a brilliant analysis

wife beater, tax evader, ponzi scheme perpetrator, legally not a US citizen, and currently owes several million in debt due to the aforementioned arm of the "greedy corporate government" as he said on fox, and yet a man saying that a ball of oil with pre workout powder somehow makes a pile of pre workout soup with tapioca pudding running off the power of a lightbulb with its own nerves winding and strangling themselves due to the fact spicy oil managed to multiply, makes more sense than a sky man who hates aforementioned powder piles touching their wands and reincarnated his son as one of them, revived him, and caused magic tricks, is somehow right.

@@aidanmatthewgalea7761 HA HA, what? Pre workout powder? Tapioca pudding nerves? I'm reading your comment over and over and I'm not sure what you're trying to say, but, it's really creative and hilarious, whatever you're saying.

@@tinstrings6312 look it up, the brain is by volume mostly water, fat and some salt, and if not preserved with formaldehyde, looks, tastes and feels like tapioca pudding. our nerves are roughly the strength of the "pudding film" and most of our nerves only schematically make sense in a fish. the nerves for speaking, swallowing and chewing are all one nerve that wraps around our Aorta and can strangle itself if it shifts even a millimeter too far

That’s how snake oil salesman work, smoke and mirrors, gaslighting, and general stupidity. I don’t remember the exact quote but it has to do with not debating idiots because they drag you to their intelligence and then win from experience at that intelligence level.

sadly, when prof dave moved on to fossils (around 40 min) it seemed he did the same, but we know he was just tired of listening to the same kent spiel over and over. if he had just realized kent didnt know evolution happens over generations of many individuals, so a protist doesnt literally pop out a tree, he couldve gotten him, but instead we got this mind numbing repetitive back and forth.

you are completely wrong, kent doesn't know how to say yes and no, he can't answer questions

Hovind did get Dave to go back on what he said. And dave doesn’t want to answer Kent either. Just being objective.

@@donkim3493 thats what annoys me so much about this, just say yes or no like come on

@@jonquebyrd3105 but he didn't want to argue and defend it

52:00 is a good example

"One of"? It is his ONLY source. He believes (or claims to believe) that the Bible is fact and the accurate description of the possible actions of God. Ofc, he only accepts the KJV of it, which had some....edits...put in to it when comparing with the previous version. Some of the books in the bible where Jesus' life is depicted were written by people that didn't live at the same time as Jesus. Now, I was raised Catholic. That does not mean that I deny science. In fact, it is quite the opposite. The insistence on depicting Science as an adversary of religion (in this case Christian religion) is baffling to me. The Bible is a set of allegories used in an ignorant time, written by ignorant people, to try to explain what was going on to other ignorant people. We can explain today, **scientifically**, some of the events described in the Bible. I think of it like this: the Bible is what you get if you ask for a primary schooler to describe more advanced scientific phenomena than he/she is prepared to explain. The primary schooler will resort to "its magic" explanation more often than not. Sorry for the wall of text, but this guy (Kent H) really annoys the crap out of me.

That is like his whole shtick

He uses only the bible as his proof and randomly throws around big words to sound smart.

He should have been a politician. Actually, no, that would be horrible.

Don’t really understand how he was dodging questions, but Alr

@@phlyweekly6822 -Talking about protista - Kent asks why rabbits haven't grown wings (Unrelated) just one of many examples.

@@Pajamas.Tepanek Can you send the time stamp? When I watched it, I found no problem with his comments or rebuttals.

@@JohnV170 hes too overqualified, he avoids paying taxes, hes physically abusive, and he cant wrap his head around anything that doesnt enforce his worldview