Randall Carlson’s RIDICULOUS Great Pyramid Hypothesis 

Maaan I'd love to watch this video but almost 2 hours. I can't spend that much time. I understand it may take that long to go through it all in depth but maybe make clips or something. You could have another channel for clips and increase your revenue. Just a thought.

You were waaay too polite to "drunk uncle" (SNL joke...) Randall Carlson. I appreciate your restraint. You are a good communicator even when claims are just plain silly. I fail to see the purpose of Randall's nonsense... Is it books and speeches? Does ''silly'' really gather the kind of audience to turn a profit? Odd.

He’s making bank. Rogan has such huge reach there’s no way he ain’t. My guess is trust the von dannikans and all the others eventually realize it’s bullshit but by then it’s their job. If I was getting rich looking for Bigfoot I’d probably keep looking no matter what I knew

What do you think of my Magic Numbers, you know what Magic says when you play it in reverse, "Wisdom".

Recently an ostrich egg. With three pyramids scrated on it. Has been dated at 7,000 years old.

Well, that is a quote worth remembering.

Exactly!

Well, if the coincidence has already happened, then the odds of it happening were always 100% It just wasn't possible to know that.

I thought it was masturbation

5 palms 2 fingers sounds like a fun date to me.

🤭 IKR. When LAHT prattles on about _"thousands of an inch"_ or whatever that becomes farcical on its' face as such metrics as you noted did not even exist at the time. What we see while in the case of buildings might have followed some level of planned dimensional outcome whereas others were often a result of aesthetics and the style of the time. I'm sure an Egyptian potter as an example did not create a vase based upon anything more than achieving a certain look consistent with said style. Most of the "precision" LAHT rattles on about is of course = illusory.......

Exactly. Looking at them one by one in detail is an interesting look into folly, but better to name and shame the worst of them in one go so that people know who to watch out for.

Let's be real. No one who falls for the pseudo-science nonsense will ever come back to reality.

@@yaldabaoth2 some do. And these videos are important for the people who might be falling down and don't really have the means to be able to interpret the constant nonsense they're being exposed to, it gives them a lifeline before they become a dribbling pseudoscience fan. This is good work and it does help.

Yes this is good work. The blind leading the blind.

@@yaldabaoth2 some do. I loved the alt stuff, but once I actually started learning about these civilizations, I realized I was misguided and wrong, and realizing how many of these pseudohistory characters are frauds. Not everyone is open to accepting being wrong, though. It's quite odd.

42 is the answer to Life, the Universe, & Everything according to the Hitch-hiker's Guide.

There's a really good XKCD about it.

I've thought about this as well. Considering how many deliberate number tricks you need to do to get to his results I deem it highly improbable that he's unconscious of the fact that he's manipulating the numbers. Repeatedly. So in this case I infer an intention. Guilty beyond reasonable doubt, or what's the phrase?

@@Spielkalb-von-Sparta There can be a lot of reinforcement going into this type of delusion. Get a bad number? well maybe you just put them together wrong. Get the same bad number several times? Hey you just discovered a new sacred number to add to your series. And don't forget that you can just multiply by a small number any time you see a near match, and justify it somehow.

@@rianfelis3156Yeah, this might counts as a "reasonable doubt." I've once heard the argument that intelligent people aren't less vulnerable to conspiracy theories because they've got more means to delude themselves. Could be similar here.

No, he is also fooling himself, it is what happens when folks don't expose themselve to peer review, Carlson is probably very intelligent and figured things out for himself, therefor hardly ever corrected, and then you can go south very south... just like scientists can.

The first time I saw him he was being interviewed and getting pressed and broke down. He's on the grift grind for sure with his pal Graham

AI?

@@WorldofAntiquity Yes, I wasn't going to write out the whole thing by myself. I do find it interesting that Eratosthenes worked out the Earth's circumference using Egypt and Syene. Of course, he had access to the Library of Alexandria. I understand your point; you can make numbers fit into any conspiracy theory you like. And it's not like they burnt down the Library of Alexandria; and we have all ancient records of Egypt. Oh wait.............

​@@WorldofAntiquitysounds like it's from Carl Sagan's show.

They literally used the same math to determine the prime meridian... 360 degrees for a circle, divided by hours and minutes. Math that goes back to at least 5000 BC.

The answer is racism.

the math surrounding ancient monuments isnt interesting?

@@catsncrypto you can do that without making up fantasies

@@catsncryptoit’s not that the math isn’t interesting-It’s that the math can be manipulated by searching for mathematical connections and super imposing meaning where there is no reason to believe there is meaning/intent to be found.

​@@catsncryptoforcing correlations into the numerical values isn't that interesting. It's too easy. But people who don't understand how easy it is tend to swallow it whole.

It's too bad that nothing he talks about is supported by evidence.

In other words he milked the whole "numerology" bit for a while and now he has shifted to a new scam to continue to monetize among the gullible.

​@@NinjaMonkeyPrimego watch squaring the circle and tell me there's no evidence. You guys like to stand on your pedestal all while keeping your minds zippered up.

You should watch the video.

_Most historians read and repeat what has been written._ You seemingly have never been in contact to any historian or haven't read any historical books or papers. They're always on there way to _improving_ our knowledge of the past. Carlson, on the other hand, has _never_ added anything to our understanding of our ancestors. All his "delightfulness" and "inspiring" falls apart, as a big overrated balloon of air, if you stick the needle of reason into it.

The authoritarians will never be on the side of discovery. Obligate groupthinkers cannot accept new ideas because their role is to remember and repeat what has been given to them by figures of authority. This is why they become violent against anyone who presents themselves as bearing truth without first dawning the robes of priestly dignity or the crown of kingship. They hate the idea of a peer of theirs being able to think for themself because they are jealous of such people, being unable, themselves, to think. Their role is to remember and repeat what is taught to them by authority.

Yes, he's adding money to his bank account, thanks to all the ignorant people falling for his con.

Well, it's nice to see you ladies so animated against an enquirer into scientific truth. You academic guards stationed at Fort History successfully scare many away and keep your pockets lined with the sale of your rehashed fairytales.

Total charlatan. Have you seen him lately on the Shawn Ryan podcast ? 🤡

Your use of labels and assumption instead of countering points with substance shows you lack objective thinking and will only get you ignored.

Ooo interesting. I had not heard that.

So volcanoes had mud brick cores then............ After all by the late Old Kingdom period pyramid construction had shifted from all stone ones to ones with cores of mud brick surrounded by a layer of polished stone - or even "boxes" of earthen fill as a base upon which more was stacked not unlike you see with pyramids elsewhere in the world. Anything to save time and effort - and cost. The point being therefore is that the Egyptians built their pyramids based upon multiple designs and techniques. The only "standardization" if you will was = they were pyramidal shape - at least on top. This of course was consistent with their religious beliefs. Moral: few pyramids contain chambers within the pyramid proper. Many were simply "capstones" for underground vaults.

@@varyolla435 is that to displace the downward pressure on the vaults apex and move it to the sides? Thanks for the reply yeah I thought it was funny that one pyramid matched a volcanos Side view (internal) and if they were building according to that natural structure there is a vault under the volcano domes as well. Maybe the peru crew was a part of that. Also the big 3 pyramids in “Egypt” spell AWA. The Copts and their eternal word play genius.

This is insulting to psychics!

_"I'm not here to tell you which ones though"_ Well that's suspicious. So you COULD tell him about the false claims but you refuse? Do you have a super model girlfriend living in another country? _"It's clear to me that you've run over a couple of his videos, JUST to "debunk" him"_ What seems clear is you never watched THIS video. Because you think he covers more than one, which he does not. That's pretty dishonest on your part. _"Anyway, good luck protecting the consensus! May "the science" forever stay the same"_ You mean like how science found evidence for a structure older than Egypt and raced to uncover it and those involved became famous and it turned into a great achievement?

@@NinjaMonkeyPrime I'm sorry, i think you confuse me with someone that gives a sht.. But anyway, i'll give you one example: "He still sells his work at Sacrate Geometry International" (SGI). Well no, SGI sells his work ILLEGALELY to this day! Pretty sloppy start to the video imo..! Eh..?! But who am i kidding? Not that you give a sht, right?

@@stefanmulder3877 _"I'm sorry, i think you confuse me with someone that gives a sht"_ You made a public comment and wanted to remain silent? Seems odd. _"Well no, SGI sells his work ILLEGALELY to this day! Pretty sloppy start to the video imo..! Eh..?!"_ So they do sell his stuff or at least showcase him, so that seems true. And Carlson has one tweet that seems to say he is NOT a partner, but not sure about anything else. But I can't help but notice, that has zero to do with the actual claims made by Carlson. Could this be the only error? And it is not related to the topic but just background about his business partners? Let me guess, you won't feel the need to reply. _"But who am i kidding? Not that you give a sht, right?"_ Do you care about the content or are you pretending to be offended by a possible error in business partnerships? Who are we kidding, there's zero evidence you will accept that Carlson is wrong. Why not just admit that? Or just refute any of the actual points made against what Carlson says on the topic? Oh right, you don't care. So if you can't find any errors in the evidence presented about Carlson and his flimsy and error prone argument, why should Carlson get respect from anyone? Should bad work be rewarded just because the person is entertaining and tells interesting stories?

@@NinjaMonkeyPrime I could really ask you the same questions, can i not? But you know, i clicked on the video for honest criticism. I'm the kind of guy that wants all angles of opinion? Multiple perspectives if you will. Unfortunately, there are a lot of dishonest people out there.. Why call Randall Carlson a "amature geologist" for example? It's really not his lack of knowledge on the scientific literature hopefully, right? We know that obviously NOT the case! ....right..? Then why i wonder? Why call him that?

@@stefanmulder3877 _"I could really ask you the same questions, can i not?"_ I have no idea what question you want to ask but I don't recall refusing to answer anything from you. So why don't you? _"But you know, i clicked on the video for honest criticism. I'm the kind of guy that wants all angles of opinion? Multiple perspectives if you will. Unfortunately, there are a lot of dishonest people out there"_ So was there a dishonest critique of what Carlson claims in his video? I think you said there were several errors but so far you just listed one and it had nothing to do with what Carlson claimed at all. _"Why call Randall Carlson a "amature geologist" for example?"_ Was that incorrect? He's never worked as a geologist and never written a single paper. Carlson is in the video saying he is a builder, not a geologist. And he makes it clear WHY he points it out - because Carlson tried to dispute years of geology with a few months of reading. So are you saying that does NOT sound amateur? Maybe he should have said incompetent? Or inept? _"It's really not his lack of knowledge on the scientific literature hopefully, right? We know that obviously NOT the case! ....right"_ So this video shows you that Carlson is in fact lacking in knowledge about limestone and erosion, and you think the opposite? I have to ask again, what evidence do you need if you're just ignoring what is presented? _"Then why i wonder? Why call him that?"_ Because the evidence shows he lacks knowledge on the topic. It's in the video you supposedly watched looking for an honest critique. But it sounds like you instead ignored the evidence. So were you really looking for an honest critique?

_"I can go into specifics but"_ Ah yes, the same excuse we hear with the super model girlfriend that lives in Canada. Let me guess, you want a debate instead? _"how about you call him out for a debate?"_ Shocking! Because it's too much for you to type in your evidence. So now we can add Carlson with Hancock to the list of people who won't debate him. And we will never know your "specifics". What a terrible shame for the world.

The dialogue is open. If Carlson feels the need to react to this video, he's free to do so. But he's probably to busy with other things, I don't know. You've wasted a lot of words but failed to bring forth an argument on your own. _I can go into specifics but I don't think it's going to do anything against such a heavy confirmation bias._ Yeah, well that's an easy cop-out. _Instead I offer a different solution: how about you call him out for a debate?_ So you're the one _offering a solution?_ So now you want to take time from both Carlson's and Miano's time table to enjoy a media show? How about formulating an argument by your own? If you're so convinced Carlson is right that should be an easy task for you.

Alright then, you asked for it: I will give you some points for you to chew on. These are not the only points I could bring up. I would invite you to apply a little bit of nuance in this discussion and to not get stuck on semantics or willful misconstructions of the points made here. This is a RU-vid comment so I wrote the following down rather quickly. 1. The uploader spends a good amount of time making a point that the slope angle of the Great Pyramid is not sufficient to determine the height of the Great Pyramid when we know that the Great Pyramid is 280 Royal Egyptian Cubits in height which will give us another layer how to determine the height of the Great Pyramid and therefore providing us with the height of the Great Pyramid being 146.6-146.7 meters. Research the consensus for the Royal Egyptian Cubit and then do the math for yourself: 280 x 0.524 (0.5236) Meters. This is something the uploader and mathematician have completely ignored. 2. The uploader and his mathematician friend didn't understand why the latitudinal/longitudinal of the equator would have been chosen on behalf of the pyramid builders, and used that as a critique of RC's hypothesis which is a red flag and I will explain why. They pretend that the equator is an arbitrary place for geodesy when it is the most reasonable point of reference that someone who would have tried to encode knowledge about the planet would have chosen. Or do you disagree that the equator is not a "universal" point of reference when it comes to the planet? 3. The Sphinx does have significant water erosion marks and the uploader uses an argument of authority aka "geologists say this so it must be true" which doesn't address the issue sufficiently. And claiming that RC "has only looked into this for a few months" and presenting him as a layman is laughable when you look at RC's geological knowledge. Just go through his two RU-vid channels to get a feel for his geological research and you will see that this is magnitudes above “looking into geology for a few months”. Just because he does not have a degree, does not mean he is not extremely well versed in the discipline - which he certainly is. He also has a 1 hour presentation on the Sphinx question where he makes his case in more nuance, but I'm guessing you aren't aware of this. There he also addresses the flooding issue. 4. The number 43200: so the great pyramid displays a light/shadow spectacle on the day of the equinox which is 43200 seconds of night and day each, the sexagesimal system going back as far as ancient Sumeria which makes it not unreasonable to conclude that the pyramid builders also applied this sexagesimal division to finer cycles of time aka minutes and seconds. If you want to be more cautious like RC and don’t want to invoke the existence of the second necessarily (even though it wouldn’t be inappropriate, see point 10), you provide it as 1/43200 of the diurnal rotation. And Not mentioning the whole equinox Spiel of the Great Pyramid is very dishonest on behalf of the uploader in this context. So using the scale 43200 is a fantastic way to express the Great Pyramid as a monument to time and space as experienced from earth. Sure, you can go out of your way to make it look like 43200 is just a random number (which is what the uploader did) but it's not an honest point in the debate, is it? From the ancient Greeks (mostly the Pythagoreans and Platonists) we also know for a fact that the number 432, 4:3:2:1 (tetractys) had tremendous significance for the ancient Egyptians. So while it may seem arbitrary to the casual observer with a modern lense, the number has a certain connotation and significance in Egyptian history. This is without mentioning the appearance of 432 and this canon of sexagesimal numbers that is emphasized in other contemporaneous ancient knowledge systems (vedas, Sumeria, Egypt etc.). We can go more in depth into the number 43200 and its significance in this canon but I think this should already be plenty to emphasize why the number 43200 certainly is not an arbitrary or connotation-free number. 5. In the video it is also implied that Randall Carlson selects the inch, furlong, foot, cubit etc. or “switches the measurements” so that he lands on the number that he wants. Well, the thing is is that these units belong to the same system of measurement or at the very least are linked to each other, in other words they are derived from certain ratios that they display to each other based on the roots. Look into RC’s diagram of ancient metrology. Clearly the mathematician isn’t aware of this point there when she says this.

6. Base 10 and base 60 are both systems that the ancient builders used. Both numbers have interesting properties (60 for example with the number of divisors, 10 from the Tetractys model), especially in light of the Fibonacci modulo circles to name one context. 7. The uploader implies that the fact that there is a slight variation in the measurements of earth makes the narrative obsolete. 8. 1:29:00 This absurd scenario that the uploader provides about the pyramid builders transmitting “The Secret message that we knew the polar radius of the earth” just as that is a phenomenal distortion from the purpose of the Great Pyramid as a monument of geometric knowledge (Geo-Metry). When the uploader creates this bizarre scenario, he ignores the whole point of the Great Pyramid signifying the distillation of geometric principles relevant for our earth and our solar system. 9. Not understanding why you would choose the medium of geometry to transmit information is also not a good look for the uploader of the video. Let me ask you this: how would you encode information so that it prevails for the longest amount of time? Would you write it down? Okay, in what language? How do you make sure that the key to the language doesn’t get lost through wars, natural catastrophes, long time spans (which happened to all ancient languages for that matter, which is why we can not understand the majority of hieroglyphs and narratives unequivocally for example). Therefore 1:31:00 “Encoded in the most unintuitive matter possible” is just an incredibly ignorant statement, which seriously damages the credibility of the video essay and shows the cognitive bias involved. (A modern equivalent of this form of transmission would be the voyager btw where we also used drawings and geometry to send it off into space as something to think about) 10. 1:36:00 And “the second only existing since the invention of the mechanical clock” is plain wrong. The Babylonians divided circles of time and space as far back as *at least* (!) 4000 years ago into minutes and seconds so this is false information on behalf of the uploader of the video. Let me emphasize this again: it is literal *false information*. Ancient Egypt and Babylon were in rich exchange of each other by the way. 11. 1:37:00 Yes you are (willfully) misunderstanding him if you don’t understand the meaning of 43200 in the context of RC’s explanation. 12. 11600 years debate: there is no fudging of the numbers, this is exactly what Plato said and if you had read the dialogues properly, it would be clear that Solon is addressed in the dialogues himself, placing the story clearly during his time and not during Plato’s. The uploader is willfully ignoring this “coincidence” yet again and worse trying to go out of his way to reject any meaning that could possibly be extracted from Plato’s account and his eerily precise date that he gave for the demise of Atlantis. It is clear that the Egyptian priests are directly speaking to Solon “O Solon, Solon [..] There is no old doctrine handed down among you by ancient tradition nor any science which is hoary with age, and I will tell you the reason behind this. There have been and will be again many destructions of mankind arising out of many causes, the greatest having been brought about by earth-fire and inundation. [..]” Read it for yourself. 13. Overall the uploader depicts the Great Pyramid as a rather imprecise monument, which is outrageous in and of itself but especially in light of the relevance of its precision for the structural integrity, as in the indentation on all 4 sides and the orientation to the cardinal directions or the shafts of the pyramid. So painting the picture of imprecise pyramid builders is also not a good look for the uploader of the video. 14. The take away of Randall Carlson's body of work is that these numbers, proportions, relationships are idealized metaphysical principles and that reality will always have a deviation or margin of error from them. RC often uses the analogy of a builder trying to build in accordance with a plan but the manifested reality will always somewhat deviate from the original plan, especially in a dynamic system like our earth our solar system. This is by the way one of the main principles of metaphysics. 15. Tossing out Sacred Geometry as just "spiritual woo woo" shows that the uploader does not have a solid grasp of the tradition. In fact it is very similar to Euclidian geometry with the difference that sacred geometry contemplates metaphysical processes and truths beyond a strict mathematic perspective. An example for this symbolical contemplation is the idea that “everything” emerges from the Vesica Piscis. From a more "scientific" standpoint you can say that you can derive all of the most important ratios for the formation of more complex geometry (root 2, root 3, 2, golden ratio, root 5, root 6, the platonic solids etc.) and the more, say esoteric, lens tells you that this is a vital template for the creation of sentient life. I would invite you to try to understand this discipline with more nuance. So all in all this video is a willful misunderstanding and twisting of RC’s theory by going out of his way to look at his points in the worst possible light. This is not historical “science” to look at theories, but rather with such a heavy confirmation bias. You can do the same willful misunderstanding of this comment if you want by playing semantics and what not but I doubt it’s going to yield a productive discourse. Overall my point is, there are serious flaws in this video, if you ignore them then that’s on you. Which brings me back to my original point that a debate between him and RC would be of most utility.

@@mikehawk8231 I just watched this part so let me respond to it. _"3. The Sphinx does have significant water erosion marks and the uploader uses an argument of authority aka "geologists say this so it must be true" which doesn't address the issue sufficiently"_ Then go refer to the research on the topic. Carlson only brings this up as a distraction so why should he spend more time on it? Plus your reply lacks anything to support that he's wrong. _"And claiming that RC has only looked into this for a few months and presenting him as a layman is laughable when you look at RC's geological knowledge"_ Based on what? He never got a degree in geology. He never worked as a geologist. He never published any papers on geology. His knowledge is just him talking about his opinion, like he did in the video. _"Just go through his two RU-vid channels to get a feel for his geological research and you will see that this is magnitudes above looking into geology for a few months”_ But that is what Carlson said on the topic of limestone - just a few months. Just because he talks about other geology topics doesn't change how long he looked at this topic. Why should we NOT take his word for it? You're trying to tell us to NOT trust his own words on how long he looked into this topic? Is that how desperate you are to defend him? _"Just because he does not have a degree, does not mean he is not extremely well versed in the discipline - which he certainly is"_ And what did he read from? The published papers of actual geologists who actually did the work and had it reviewed by peers. You seem to be avoiding the point that Carlson never showed what he found in his months of observation. He never published anything. He just claims he looked into it and he concluded it would take over 10k years to show that erosion. It's the ultimate in "trust me bro". _"He also has a 1 hour presentation on the Sphinx question where he makes his case in more nuance, but I'm guessing you aren't aware of this. There he also addresses the flooding issue"_ Did you forget you were supposed to show where the video was wrong? Because you still haven't. Carlson is ignoring the evidence that the area was underwater around the time he thinks it was built. He's going to need to explain why the peer reviewed papers are wrong and why he's not presenting his evidence to remove those papers. He's pretending to understand the science involved better than those who put their work up for review, but he's refusing to prove that he in fact does have that superior knowledge. I see you also avoided how his reference is only Schoch and not several other geologists. And how that Schoch doesn't agree with his estimates except for more "trust me bro" behind closed doors. My guess is you can't refute those bogus statements so you're going to avoid them. In summary you haven't shown any errors in what was said on the Sphinx. It's not relevant to sacred geometry at all and his ideas on it being older have nothing to do with his faulty math. It only serves to try and throw doubt into the evil scientists who keep ruining things with evidence. Your own "defense" is to cry that Carlson claims to have lots of knowledge because Carlson told you he has lots of knowledge in videos. Well duh, that's how he gets his money. He spins these mysterious tales and charms people into thinking he's smarter than the evil scientists who are hiding the mysteries of the world from the public. Of course he has to keep telling you how hard he worked on reading the material from other people. Because after reading from the experts, he can just claim they're all dummy heads and sell you magic stories about numbers. He can't prove any of this by refuting the evidence in the papers with his own evidence, because he's never done any actual work himself. But he does have cool stories so you should just "trust me bro" as he gish gallops around about how he's super researched on this stuff. Pretty lame defense. Why not just admit to the flaws in the presentation from Carlson? Do you have a need for him to be perfect?

They probably came up with the metric system first, then they built the Earth.

Yeah we French are really REALLY smart !!! 😂😂😂

​@@Deipnosophist_the_Gastronomer I always thought the name Slarty Bartfast sounded French.

​@@bipolarminddroppingsI loved the fjords in the Camargue

read Civilization One by Alain Butler and Christopher Knight

He had to use shadows ... absent minded ole goat left the calculator back in the cave.

You dont know how refreshing your comment is..

Don’t lie you know he had to find the book of the dead in that cabin before he discovered the size of the earth

Nah bro. Eratosthenes was visited by aliens and they just told him the size of the earth, and then left. It's a much easier explanation.

That and why the fuck is it that fucking big?? Couldnt you use the same formula, but make it smaller? In this theory, he proposes that they are amazingly precise but somehow they’re always either off or kind of off 😂

100 percent. "This is complex and I don't understand it, therefore it must be profound."

Which paper shows the entire Giza complex to be completely flooded for thousands of years? The cited works don’t show that

@@Tucker93669 Agreed, my research is showing that it was tropical between 20,000- 10,000 years ago. Did not find anything saying it was completely flooded... What we do know is that there was a long period of time, that it took on water damage and it could not have been in the last 5,500 years because their was no such rail fall to create that kind of deterioration.

Brava Bravo

yeah you were bullshitted in school and your brain was baffled

Thanks for the time you took to prepare for and appear in this video Kaitlyn!

Thank you for taking the time to respond to our questions. I am a bit confused by something that WoA said. Isn't the radius of an object measured from the center to the outer circumference? The radius of earth is 3,963 miles but WoA says some crazy number in the 400k + range. 52:23 ish minutes into the video. Did i miss something?

​@@mattking993 I think he meant to say the radius of the sun, not Earth.

Thanks, Kaitlyn! This should be pinned on top, I propose.

Okay, why you believe only europeans can measure the Earth? I checked Randalls claim, its true to 99,94% (NASA) no coincidence.

My favorites by far

1080 ÷ 60 is 18 18 × 20 is 360 360 is 12 lunar months or one lunar year This proves the resolution of your monitor was based on sacred geometry, probably made with blueprints from an ancient world wide civilization, but they are hiding it from us!

Made even worse by modern day air pollution.

The casing stones which would have been where the hieroglyphs would have been have been removed.

As noted by others Egyptian sites were cannibalized in the 14th and 19th Centuries as I recall for their stone - specifically any white Tura limestone casing stones etc.. These were stolen so as to build other things like forts and Mosques around Egypt. The grand Mosques of Cairo as an example were built from limestone taken from Giza. p.s. - this was not limited to above as the Egyptians themselves and others also sometimes stole stone from ancient sites to repurpose it for something. Djedefre's Pyramid at Abu Rawash as an example saw its' granite blocks stolen during Roman times.

@@brianmincher716 Meaning that any remaining hieroglyphs are probably building instructions.

Or humans destroyed it 🤣

Even more so when done by people that use neither imperial measurements nor the decimal system lol

Welcome to the wonderful world of decimal feet.

We literally use decimal places every day work when machining. It is very relevant.

@lisukeholifield3649 you machine by feet to 3 decimal points do you...sure you do. Maybe reread it and think about that for a while... then delete your comment

@@lisukeholifield3649no machinist does anything by feet to multiple decimal points. If you’re machining to class tolerances you’re not using feet at all, it’s going to be metric.

Have you ever read the paper that was published in the journal of applied physics a few years back about Giza? I cant remember the name of the paper or the author but from my very limited understanding of physics it seems that their little computer model shows that the Giza complex might have been built in that manipulates radiowaves in some way. I know its just a computer model but if it can be shown to be an intrinsic feature of the pyramid itself wouldnt that kind of throw a wrench into the idea this stuff is nonsense? I cant imagine a way in which that happens by accident.

the name of the paper is "Electromagnetic properties of the Great Pyramid: First multipole resonances and energy concentration". I only understand how to program computers so this sort of applied phyiscs is well beyond my knowledge. I got no idea what most of that paper is even talking about but I never here anyone talking about it or trying to explain it. Maybe its a bad paper that shouldnt have been publish I dunno

@@iraniansuperhacker4382I just downloaded it and will have a look in the coming days :)

@iraniansuperhacker4382 I actually just looked this paper up. It costs USD40 to read. I didn't read it, but the abstract sounds like they're just bouncing some radio (or radar) off stuff. Lots of stuff reflects and scatters radio waves... like mountains, and planets, the moon, etc.

@@juliavixen176 there is a very nice website for getting papers 4 free ;-) but I think youtube censors the name.

When's the North pseudo-science debunking series coming bro?! You know we're waiting!

@@_MikeJon_ I have thought about debunking some stuff though it can be tricky. The younger dryas video I made is sort of a debunking video

@@NORTH02Oh I'm fully aware. I watch all your stuff lol. But I think you would make a great detailed video on the subject. You're well researched and your video quality is excellent. Nevertheless for every video like Doc made here there's 10,000 Randall Carlsons and Graham Hancock videos. The more credible people touching on the subject the better. Plus you know it would be fun lol.

@@_MikeJon_ - Speaking of the Younger Dryas, "The Tel" channel has a nice, concise debunker video on it.

@@MossyMozart I know it. Great content too.

Thank you! This is actually very helpful when sparring with a Roganite. Using feet was a huge red flag to all the non-Americans watching this, I imagine. Those of us like myself who are stateside idiots didnt connect that initially.

time was created by the Egyptians

@@AhmedOfKemeti don’t know about carlsons but it does not matter the length system, what matters are the propprtions. What you are saying is the same as knowing how to add oramges but not apples as a 5 years old child learning the basic operations.

@@marcuso.424 no, it does matter since Carlson is adding and dividing fixed constants like 2 and 4 .. the unit will matter.

@@thelordllsortem that's true only Quentin Tarantino would measure even the planet in FEET.

Did you check his works cited on the claim that the Giza complex was completely flooded for thousands of years? Because his works cited doesn’t say that at all lol

@AllHailDiskordia - In the aerial shots of the Giza Plateau, you can see many of them.

Correct. People tried it, didn't work, they wrote it down, tried something else, worked better, wrote it down, tweaked it. Then THAT worked. Write it down. Do it again. You now, how all human endeavor has worked. Period.

The unfinished Ryugyong Hotel in Pyongyang are formed as a pyramid of the same reason. Sourcing high quality materials in North Korea forced such a design.

Only if you go by evidence and observation. You’re supposed to go by what loosely fits the conclusions you started with, the ones that will sell your books and speaking engagement tickets at looney conventions. With that in mind, clearly the aliens/Atlanteans made the really good ones, and then humans gradually made shittier and shittier ones as time passes and we _forgot how to make them_ (This is really one of their arguments. 🤦)

You got no rteal knowledge to the matter i see. The oldest ones, are the ones that are stand still, so there dor, there is no evolution, Plus after the great pyramids that are still stand, you got to undertand that pyramind after thatm were poorly constructed in the inside, but they would probably had a well cut granite or andesite, or other kinds of stone, that were probably removed, to build the next one, fromt the next pharao, or other cultures that invade egypt to their own constructions, like happens with the great pyramid, and all around.

What's your problem dude? You don't feel the trans-conscious gaia vibes from the arbitrary contrived number rubbish that means something something whatever?

@lakrids-pibe - Reality is so fascinating, enthralling, interesting, and captivating that I feel no need to embrace fairytales.

Strange how all the conspiracy theorists bang on about the amazing achievements of the Egyptians but never have any interest in the engineering practices that made them possible

Real scholars are grant money dependent while calling themselves data dependent. Money sways reality and people are willing to kill for it.

Claiming the entire Giza complex was completely flooded for thousands of years when nothing cites this is also a fantastical claim.

I have to admit some of his field studies are actually pretty amazing.

It's also really fun because you can quite easily repeat it yourself if you just get a friend that lives roughly on the same longitude as you.

If you ask those kinds of people for hard evidence, they will lash out at you, call you a shill for academia and block you lol

Sounds like Ron Wyatt, a legendary fake archeologist who claimed to have found all sorts of Biblical artifacts.

Wtf does that have to do with this you and the creator if this video are just full of shit beechs

Lawyers in a Liars Club... seems redundant.

Desperate for what? 🤓 his main thing are ice age floods in North America and that seems to be pretty much confirmed, so what's he deperate for?

Your problem is you're going from belief to belief. Seek the truth with no belief, and you'll be more alert to life around you.

@GLaDOS_WR - I used to read such books when I was young, too. I'm glad I stopped. Reality is so much more exciting. I don't want to waste another second of my life on garbage like Carlson and Hancock.

@@ccoodd26 - It's never a problem when someone moves from a state of sleepwalking to the tune of a scammer to a state of being fully awake and seeking knowledge from mentors who know what they are talking about. @GLaDOS_WR-1 is doing well.

Yes, they provided a lot of information. But almost nothing actually debunks his theory. Both Graham and Carlson can get pretty "out there," but they also get a lot of stuff right. It's almost like they're real people.

​@@MossyMozartjust because there may be a few things that may be off or completely wrong doesn't mean everything they say is completely bogus

A typo sets you right off huh? Wow

Spell Check police. Critical thinking stops at a misspelled word.

A mistake in youtube comment sets you off? Lol. It's not War and Peace get over yourself.

​@@mystijkissler8183no but when this man has got everything else terribly wrong and he then proceeds to ruin spelling too isn't a great look. If he had got some things right nobody would care about a misspelling or two

@@lucifer-ic9th terribly wrong? this video doesn't prove anything beyond an ad populum fallacy and appeal to authority fallacy. The citation doesn't show that the area around the sphinx was completely flooded for 6500 years either.

I wonder how the shadow in relationship to the angle changes throughout the day and year.

@@mshaffer-2629 All it takes is to install a 360 cam on the pyramid top for a year , I wonder If one can sneak a drone on top without someone noticing....

@@מוגוגוגו They have been using shadow to measure time since the dawn of man, IMO. A good outdoorsman (not me) can find true north in about 10 minutes by observing a shadow.

*If you're so confident that your theories are the only correct ones, why do you waste your time attacking amateur hobbyists like RC?* I am not sure why you think that only people who are sure of their own theories are able to debunk someone else's. What do my theories have to do with this? Nothing. *He's no threat to you* Why do you think that I only make videos about ideas that I consider a threat? *the way you guys go after him speaks to a deep insecurity and fear.* The way that you are responding to this video speaks of a deep insecurity and fear. Why not just learn something about the subject and continue to live your life? It's no skin off your nose, is it? *Just seems like a colossal waste of time to go after him like he's some kind of legit threat to your professional reputation* I'm a teacher. Teaching isn't a waste of my time. There are many ways to teach. Sometimes I do it by traveling to ancient places. Sometimes I do it by answering people's questions. Sometimes I do it by examining other people's proposals. It's all good. Lighten up.

​@WorldofAntiquity starting at 51:12 you go in to make an egregious error. Will you acknowledge it? Publicly correct it? And revise the false implications you assert based on the error? An apology would also seem appropriate in my opinion considering you attack Carlson in a pretty nasty way prior to the egregious error. I look forward to your response and correcting the mistake.

@@drew7155 I don't see an error there. What error do you think you see?

same, also note how with people like uncharted X its all about selling the tours.

no. they are the Keepers of Ancient Wisdom. persecuted and disregarded geniuses akin to Galileo & Kepler. kneel, lowly dog and worship at the feet of your Ascended Masters!!

@@chuckleezodiac24 I genuinely can't tell if you're joking.

@@hedgehog3180 thanks! i've been working on it. trying to blur the lines between Delusional Atlantard & Sarcastic Troll.

@@chuckleezodiac24 You definitely fooled me lmao.

Oh but at what cost to your conscious to humanity ?there is also much much pain in order to have that comfort ......might not be your pain .....yet...

It can also be wiped out in a nanosecond. How equipped are we to deal with that eventuality?

@@toucheturtle3840 No it can't do you even know how short a nanosecond is? Even the most destructive possible event like a close by supernova would take at least a few seconds to wipe out life on Earth.

and someone who posts mealy mouth sh!t insulting a guy and his theories is just a cheap little poopy bum bufufoon

Hater!!

He was actually pretty good when he stayed in his lane and covered interesting topics in geology. Then he was recruited by the woo crowd and went off the rails, poor guy.

Randall is quite knowledgeable on a variety of subjects and his theories are no more outlandish than some of those that have been established through current consensus, which relies on much speculation. We may never know the absolute truth of ancient history. That's what makes it interesting.

@@TB-zw7dt Randall can be disproved whether his theories are outlandish or not. The fact is we DO know a lot about ancient history and it's much more important and interesting in my opinion to focus on that

@mtreder4 - "Sclerotic" is a good descriptor.

I’d love to see Miano vs Corsetti. Corsetti has some good ideas but also some very wrong ones, imo. As for this video…can you imagine anyone doing a better job being entertaining AND thorough while debunking Carlson? I can’t.

@@maidende8280 by saying the video wasn't as fun as I thought it would be, I rather meant the level of research by Miano far surpasses the claims of Carlsen. If this was a boxing fight, it would have been a first round KO with Miano continuing to punch Carlsen's lifeless corpse for 11 more rounds. It's a conundrum. I love to see this stuff thoroughly debunked, but once the real science and research comes into play it quickly becomes apparent that this is a total mismatch. I think Corsetti's would look ridiculous after about 6 minutes of Miano talking. I'm all for it though!

To be fair, people like Carlson amd Hancock make a lot of money spinning their nonsense and have quite influential platforms which they use to spread misinformation. I get what you are saying about the rebuttal coming across as mean, but I do think Carlson and co deserve getting dunked on.

@@girondinant yeah they definitely deserve it, I agree. Both have done extremely well financially as well as finding a kind of cult status with this niche field.

Considering that Carlson has a grade school level grasp of math it's like a kid fighting Mike Tyson.

he's actually not... but im sure you also checked the citations of this grifter, didn't you?

Don't put Randall and x in the same category. Randall is at least original and invents his own stuff. Uncharted just repeats everyone else's stuff. He is a fat lazy ass. Just like that dim no sight .

I don’t get why more people aren’t repelled by these fat slobs. I find it very difficult to take people seriously who can’t even take care of themselves properly. Also I can’t stand looking at them.

Hi, I've been watching Randall's kosmographia episodes a lot and I want to understand where he's going wrong, I'm not sure about the sacred geometry stuff but are the kosmographia episodes sound facts or is he wrong? And in what ways? I'm trying to understand particularly his views and hypothesis' about climate change as opposed to people like Myles Allen and his recent lecture 'the ice is melting' for example. 🫶

@@user-ol2mr4bx7c if i know enough to have a valuable opinion ill watch these episodes and get back with you.

yes , you sooooo smart . NOT . more thatn a few hours fool , sounds like a lifetime for you

Sphinx is carved from bedrock that is currently touching ground water. The water underground causes the surface stone to erode.

"I totally believe a PhD in Philosophy teaming up with a Mathematician to discuss geology, masonry, surveying, civil engineering and architecture. Since most of the experts agree it must be fact!"

I'm assuming you didn't check the citations.

She was really not very helpful, rarely finishing her sentences and jumping from thought to thought.

I'm pretty good with geometry... Kaitlyn could've explained it MUCH more clearly, especially when explaining Egyptian units and preferences... but yeah, go with her numbers over RC's, who's essentially combing the cherry orchard for heart-shaped cherries, so that he can prove that the ancient cherry growers were trying to develop heart-shaped cherries... and he couldn't find enough perfect ones, so some of them are like, really?

@@GizzyDillespeeThis is the RU-vid comments section right ?. I kinda got the feeling Kaitlyn is not used to talking to a whole bunch of thick people. When it comes to math and geometry..I'm defiantly one. It could have been explained in a way more people would understand, but I understood enough and enjoyed the vid. Thanks for reply.

I’m good at maths & there’s no competition. But you don’t need to be good at maths to understand that Carlson is reaching far beyond logic, as depicted in Miano’s hypothetical conversation between the builders.

The math isn't actually all that important, the more important point is just that Carlson is deliberately cherry picking specific measurements in specific units in order to fit his conclusion. Like notice how he'll randomly switch between imperial and metric without actually converting between the two, he's doing that so he can get the numbers to match whatever conclusion he wants. Also occasionally he'll actually use ancient Egyptian units like the cubit and the seked but only when it fits his conclusion, which seems odd since surely it'd make the most sense to talk about the pyramids using the units of the people who made them right? Like the Egyptians or anyone prior to them couldn't possibly have known about the modern American Foot or Meter, both of those units were only created about 4000 years after the great pyramids were built.

ROFL 🤣

Changing the units (assuming larger feet, or whichever units) doesn't change the ratios. For example, the ratio between the pyramid's base and the Earth's circumference stays the same no matter what units you measure them with... as long as you're consistent. By inconsistent, I mean, for example, if you measure the pyramid with one arbitrary unit (feet) and measure the Earth with a different arbitrary measurement (meters), then the ratio is meaningless. The units have to be the same for both measurements, if you want their ratios to have physical meaning. But it doesn't matter which unit you choose to measure with. This is the kind of thing that seems to confuse people at first, and then to be really obvious, once people think about it for a minute. Also, many of RC's claims of perfect mathematical correspondences are wrong... as this video shows, many of the measurements he mentions aren't as accurate or precise as he says they are... and some of them don't even fall within the margin of error for his calculations. As far as Neanderthals... I REALLY wish we could find some Neanderthal community that was preserved thru time by a sudden catastrophic volcano eruption... a Neanderthal village version of Pompei. They died so long ago that material preservation is limited. I wish we knew more about Neanderthals. I saw the Why Files episode on them, which made them seem like the urukai from Lord Of The Rings (I'm serious... it got over a million views). There was some good storytelling, but it's educated speculation. I wish we knew more definitively. I wish Elon Musk got a Neanderthal's DNA and cloned him/her, and eventually we make an army of Neanderthal slaves, to do what the AI robots won't be able to... until those 2 factions rise up against us, and take over the world. Okay, I take back that wish - I didn't think it thru. But I still wish we knew more about Neanderthals.

I didn't mention the sphinx head proportions, because I believe the sphinx's head has been renovated and changed at least once since its original shape. It's so much smaller than the body, and it looks so much less weathered than the rest of the sculpture. It's really obvious that the head is a newer carving - just look at a tourist video that rotates around the sphinx, looking at the difference between the body and the head (especially the face - the back of the neck is smoother than the sphinx's body, but apparently less was removed from the head-dress side), and see how much smaller and newer the head appears to be. So, we can't use the facial features or neck to obtain any useful information about the original head and neck.

@@GizzyDillespee We should selectively breed to increase Neanderthal DNA. I have 6% and I’m pretty awesome. I think the Neanderthals were superior in many ways including intellectually but I *may* be biased. One of my theories is they never truly died out, they just hybridised with Homo sapiens & live in hiding, breeding amongst themselves. Possibly in a biosphere…

This is so nonsensical that I can’t tell if it’s a hilarious joke or a Randall Carlson quote 😂. Either way I’m laughing!

@@krakensquatch What. You thought I was serious. Surely you don't think Neandrathals possess space age tech. They had a hard time chasing wolly mammoths to bother with measuring the distance to the moon.

so hes a nutjob because he states information you disagree with.... take your meds dude

that is not how any of this works, kid@@notafortnitegamer

​@@notafortnitegamer you're spazzing out all over this comment section haha

@@Crannogman4686ah yes im spazzing out cause I posted a couple of comments lol

​@@notafortnitegamer I'm doing it too haha

Their sacred geometry is messing up my feng shui. I don’t get why he’s discussing socles without mentioning shoesles.

@@MarcosElMalo2 - .^_^.

@@MarcosElMalo2 good one Chip

If you’re not precise in your writing, what else are you inaccurate about?

Really? Americans built something similar into one of their massive dams, showing how the stars were aligned, so future civilisations could know the date the dam was built. It was an encoded msg? So it shouldn’t be that hard to believe that other civilisations have done it. So unsure why it had you cracking up, when we have done exactly the same

Do you think Epstein killed himself?

"I totally believe a PhD in Philosophy teaming up with a Mathematician to discuss geology, masonry, surveying, civil engineering and architecture. Since most of the experts agree it must be fact!"

@@Tucker93669 The implied appeal from authority, does not persuade.The biggest aspect of belief in anything is wanting what you believe, to be true. Confirmation bias, misrepresentation/misinterpretation of data, cherry picking and just plain ol makin shit up are the tools of the trade for all charlatans.

Basically, reality isn't fun enough for them. Yeah, it's fun to read sci-fi about Lizard People living underground, or another civilization before ours that was wiped out by an asteroid (especially since that could happen to us), but there's no evidence for these things actually being real.

It's because these theories were cooked up by, and fundamentally have their roots set in old racist theories. Theories that posited that the (non white) Egyptians couldn't have possibly been capable of stacking up rocks and therefore someone else must have built it, or someone else must have taught them. That runs the gamut between aliens and an ancient globe spanning civilization that leaves no trace of itself. Depending on who you ask of course

@@highjumpstudios2384 No. You're wrong. It ALL starts with this one question... How could they build the great pyramid in only 20 years? Millions of huge "rocks" moved long distance... More than even ALL that, they say that equals something like a block every few minutes, 24 hours a day. How is that possible with their little technology? No steel, no wheels, no elephants, no writings, just... nothing. But they did have the Nile, many people that were surely fed well, dictatorship, slaves. More than all that even still more. Look what they did under ground... somehow more impressive than the pyramids.

@@IntelligentElephant why did you put rocks in quotations? And also did you forget about wooden rollers?

Same here. He and Graham were always interesting to me. It feeds the imagination and thats fun. Now this “class” is beyond mental gymnastics. The dude is scratching his heels with the same foot’s tor at this point. God damn i cant even believe some people eat that stuff up.

Agreed, eventually lost interest. The Royal system's like Greek to me. Use both maybe?

WHy would they use metric either, which is ALSO arbitrary. Sure, its scientifically measured but they had to pick something to measure it BY

@@samwill7259 Metric was actually supposed to be based on the circumference of the Earth, with the original goal being that there'd be 6000 km from Paris to the North Pole, however this was the 18th century so their measurements weren't super precise, hence why that isn't the case.

@@hedgehog3180 Well sure but that's still arbitrary. It's not some cosmically ordained measurement, we still had to pick two points when they could have been any two points at any division on the planet, you know what I mean?

The inch furlong and mile are much older than England and Anglos

but you bought the claim that the area around the sphinx was completely flooded for thousands of years when (checks citation) that's not what the science suggests at all... You didn't look up the citation did ya? Just bought some philosopher's nonsensical argument.

Sacred geometry is to math what playdough is to marble sculpting.

Ignorance is no excuse.

@@hedgehog3180 Ignorance is no excuse

Especially when the kind of maths used is 10th grade stuff.

Don't listen to this guy. I'm from 3122, and our senior prank in space high school was to take a couple days to make the Pyramids and send them back in time to swap them with the ones the 3094 team were prepping to send back in time to Egypt.

@@valritz1489 I am from 4124 and y'all lying ....

I'm going to having taken my TARDIS back to the past in order to proving you wrong. Then you have shall seen!

@@valritz1489 one of you is lying

Can you please do something constructive with your "Time Travelling expertise and undo the 2020 US election.

Clearly, the only way to learn is to buy his books and find out! 🤪 (/s)

We are very skilled stone workers today. That's why all of us live in stone houses, right?

@@framegrace1 many of us do, since concrete is, in fact, stone.

@@framegrace1 The US is like the only country in the world where homes are regularly made out of plywood, in literally every other country homes are built from brick and concrete, the US just uses uniquely cheap and shitty construction techniques.

​@@framegrace1We don’t have that level of skill for the hardness and size of stones used.