Ranger: Hunting Submarines 

You can stay underwater for a time but your battery needs to refill

Cv plane don't have ability to detect subs.. If they did it.. It would make game much worse.. The only that can detect subs are ship on the surface. Like dds for example.. That carry depth charge n seamine to kill the subs For subs underwater time.. Yes.. It should have a timer.. And if they on submerge.. Decrease speed by half.. And get rid that homming thingy.. It just stupid idea

All of those suggestions are in favor of the ships that are trying to kill the sub, what does the sub get in return?

@@juanmiguelfernandez9730 that was the problem, even if you battery need to refil with surfacing, not hiding the fact that you can still underwater from start of the match till the end of the match and launching torps

@@markk875 SS already have almost everything, good concealment, almost invulnurable, citadel torp with 60 knts speed, hydro accoustic torp, perma spotting more worse than aircraft, ability to avoid Deep charge, even healing consumable

So Hallands AA rocket pods should be real as well you say?

​@@kellypatrick4366 And while we're at it don't forget to add Midway's *squint* Ballistic missile? For reference: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-sJi8Ym1ADMQ.html

@@kellypatrick4366 No, No I mean Hoods rocket pods should be real ;).

@alan mei they should work just like the HE bombs in one of notser most recent sub videos his sub gets hit hard from APDB

xyz some subs were able to still float when breached with bulkheads

And another thing: U-boat in the atlantic where completely destroyed by English aircraft because they couldn't hide from them.

It could be interesting

I dont really think they will add them. The ss can just surface and the depth charges would do nothing against him. Adding a 4th squadron for ASW doesn´t make too much sense in the game.

@@esaualfaro3447 And when the Submarine surfaces, the destroyers, light cruisers and other ships will shoot the shit out of it

Depth charge also made to force SS to the surface.

Yep. Finally my Essex will be back.

SebaX 👍 I miss both Essex and Taiho

Somebody said taiho

Damn it WG. You deleted the most beautiful and also famous Cv classes from the game for no reason...

@@ok-lf4ps there is a reason, more premiums for realese

Yep. You can OHK sub if you drop your bomps from bow to stern

or maybe use AP bomb so the submarine will have instand 3 Flooding XD

@@lynizie-8489 submarines should get flooding even when ANYTHING hits it, but good idea😉😉😉

Since submarines aren't that agile and can only dodge reliably by going deeper, being able to hit the bombs in a single spot like dive bombers do makes them more efficient

Jingles maybe

Underwater detection range is around 2km. And yes hydro works on them.

DCs for battleship is eh, sonar equipped float planes are much more viable. Make your team mates support you actually win a multiplayer game is the intention. Submarines are becoming a good counter to battleships since currently it always requires BB to defeat another BB (especially on higher tiers)

@Nguyen Johnathan he said BB AIRCRAFT not the actual battleship itself Read before you comment

Moska es OP believe me I have salen is a cool ship Yoshino hit hard I like it but moska go for it

On which ship are you? The split is gonna come with 9.5, we are currently at 9.3.5. This means you will have at least 2 updates of time. If you are at the t8 or dimitri its still makeable. Even if youanre at t7 it may be possible, depending on how much you are willing to grind

Amazing Blyatman only on t5 because Russian cruisers didn’t interest me that much. Salem is I think my number one for the pick right now

Salem is mostly useless Des Moines much better.. Try Georgia or Thunderer

Go to setting when you click on world of warships, then click add game instance. Select public test and download it. You can also find how to exactly do it on the website of world of warship news.

perhaps tomorrow

@@TTier i hope too friends, is really hard use submarine

@toptier can u tell me where and how to get them plane mods? I play brits.

Submarines are only on PTS server right now in their 3rd iteration.

they are coming in 0.9.4

@@b-17gflyingfortress6 check the official wows web and news

@@Crater74 will they come out with the russian cruiser split?

Uss Enterprise devblog

Destroyers and light cruisers carry depth charges

I think it can be included in the game with some adjustment.

@@TTier I hope so. From what I've been hearing from others it doesn't look promising. Like how sub commanders can be almost immune to damage by staying just below 6.1m, pop up really quick to fire torps, and back down to 6.1m before someone's shots has a chance to hit. That can be heavily exploitable for subs. One more thing, CL's should be able to take some of the work load off DD's when it comes to ASW work. DD's already have so much to do.

With homing torpedoes (ridiculous), dive below damage threshold, deep dive to counter depth charges, and their spotting, subs are way over-powered.

@@sempermilites87 It is way easier said than done. A good submarine will be able to mitigate a lot of damage, but doing that and attacking at the same time is very difficult to do. CLs do have depth charges, but CAs and BBs don´t.

@@TTier Members of our clan on NA spent 7 hours back on Friday on the PTS, trying subs themselves, DD's CL's and CV's against subs, and divisioning subs with other ships, live streaming so the rest of us could watch, and give suggestions and feedback for trying different tactics and ideas in real time. Overall, I'd agree with what Kingpin6100 said on his stream later that day - subs are either completely OP against something that can't spot them or fight back like a BB - or they're completely worthless against a DD or CL that can one-shot them in one pass - there's no middle ground. The one potential game-breaking feature of subs right now, is their ability to spot other ships from a position of near-invulnerability. One tactic my clan mates employed was to div a U-69 with two RN DD's. When an opposing DD or CL tried to take cover in smoke, the U-69 would sneak towards the smoke cloud, pop Hydro Search, spot everything in the smoke, and his two div mates in RN DD's would then trash the enemy DD or CL from the safety of their own smoke, oft times other team mates adding fire support as well. I've seen other games ruined by the addition of a "stealth" class that was poorly balanced. I fear WG is getting ready to make the same mistake with subs.

Lol have you seen the torpedo beats of subs it's so cool

No

yes, check the official wows page

Yes, but you play against them in "Submarine Battles" queue (not in randoms).

they have a consumable to reduce the dmg, not to get immune to dmg, pls stick to the trueth. also this ehole thing could be more balanced, make subs hittaboe much further down like 15 meter when bombing or shooting them, require them to stay on periscope depth to torpedo, make the diving not instant but on a timely delay, i.e after you press dive you have 10 seconds on dive prepartions before actually changing depth

@@TheBaBySiTteR90 the damage is so reduced its closer to immunity. Agree on your points that more balanced is needed though.

My experience with Leander: If you see a submarine going lower than 50km, it means he used the consumable, so just don´t drop your DCs and wait for it to come up again. Keep him detected with hydro, and if you can, stay close to him. CLs and DDs are faster and more agile than an underwater SS, and they really can´t attack if they´re not able to attack anything because the homing torps can really curve that much to attack players 80m above them. Now what WeeGee should do is maybe nerf the time a SS can stay at max depth.

The akizuki class kitakaze and harugumo are subs killer!!!! They ve got a lot of dept charges!!!

There are no subs into the pc game as well. The subs for now are only avaliable at the testing servers not in the actual game