Тёмный

Razavi Electronics2 Lec21: Computation of Freq. Resp., Freq. Resp. of Common-Emitter/Source Stages 

Behzad Razavi (Long Kong)
Подписаться 41 тыс.
Просмотров 45 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

15 авг 2018

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 31   
@coolwinder
@coolwinder 3 года назад
01:25 - Intro and Review of Lecture 20 04:28 - General Procedure for Frequency Response Computation 10:58 - Preview of Analysis Circuits 13:12 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response 24:00 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Finding Poles by Inspection 32:20 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Bode's Plot 34:15 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Exact Analysis 44:15 - CE/CS Stage Frequency Response: Observations and Dominant Pole Approximation
@artemisiasoumpasakou4547
@artemisiasoumpasakou4547 5 лет назад
I feel that you are more important than Sedra Smith.
@alexandrosanastasiou1964
@alexandrosanastasiou1964 5 лет назад
Και μόνο που ανέβασε τις διαλέξεις αυτές τον καθιστά σκάλες ανώτερο
@Gatos77
@Gatos77 3 года назад
@@alexandrosanastasiou1964 Τον έχω συναντήσει από κοντά, θα ανεβάσει κι άλλα στο μέλλον.
@zinhaboussi
@zinhaboussi 5 месяцев назад
don't say that, sedra and smith are very old than Prof Razavi, smith alone was in his 90 before he died in the end of 2023, it's true that Razavi he initiate good initiatives to help students, but sedra and smith book still have one of the most creative learning approach to simplify microelectronics curriculm to the aspiring students
@nikoszervo
@nikoszervo Месяц назад
It is harder to understand the Sedra Smith's book, but it has some more deep explanations. In my opinion, combining Mr's Razavi lectures with Sedra Smith's book is the BEST WAY to learn as of 2024!!! Once you completely master Sedra Smith's book, you move to Arts Of Electronics (which the E-book is free by the way) and you master hundreds of actual circuit applications.
@ggmb1032
@ggmb1032 6 месяцев назад
Thank you so much sir for your generosity of your knowledge and explaining everything so well and in detail. You are blessing and treasure to this world. God bless you and your family.
@skshrest
@skshrest 4 года назад
I humble gratitude to you sir. You are up there withe the best teachers there has ever been.
@fadiharb2023
@fadiharb2023 3 года назад
You are the king of analog design world Professor .. thx you a lot
@GodLeclerc
@GodLeclerc 4 года назад
이 형은 진짜다 시벌ㅋㅋㅋ전세계 회로계의 대부님ㄹㅇ 이해가 쏙속 가네
@umapatikumarsinha2077
@umapatikumarsinha2077 5 лет назад
you are amazing
@amitgalkin1215
@amitgalkin1215 3 месяца назад
thank you so much!
@muratt6894
@muratt6894 5 лет назад
Thank You
@anafivp7897
@anafivp7897 5 лет назад
nice lecture
@fabianporras8585
@fabianporras8585 Год назад
muchas gracias!
@mrpossible5696
@mrpossible5696 5 лет назад
Ty
@mnada72
@mnada72 3 года назад
Waiting eagerly for circuit theory I & II and the rest of the series.
@felixqi6659
@felixqi6659 3 года назад
Here I see you again, XDD
@mnada72
@mnada72 3 года назад
@@felixqi6659 I have gone through the whole 90 episode , I wish there is more , this guy is a genius
@felixqi6659
@felixqi6659 3 года назад
@@mnada72 Of course u r right, he is "the God of Electronics."
@alex_hiller
@alex_hiller Год назад
I think Prof Razavi's denominator in the transfer function at 43:00 might be wrong. I put the KCL equations through a symbolic solver and got the following for the transfer function : R_D*(g_m - C_GS*s)/R_D*R_G*s^2*(C_DB*C_GD + C_DB*C_GS + C_GS^2) + s*(C_DB*R_D + C_GD*R_D*R_G*g_m + C_GD*R_G + C_GS*R_D + C_GS*R_G) + 1. The difference being with the square term on the denominator, where instead of C_GS*C_GB, I got C_GS^2. Not super important, but caused me some confusion.
@GautamGarg_0
@GautamGarg_0 Год назад
I carried out the calculations myself, his function is correct. You must have made some mistake in between
@alexandrosanastasiou1964
@alexandrosanastasiou1964 5 лет назад
One question, at ~ 31:50 why is the transistor Current Source = g_m * V_1 considered an independent current source? This source should not be set to zero.
@jovandrum21
@jovandrum21 5 лет назад
Yes, but because the input voltage goes to zero, V1 also is zero, and hence gmV1 is zero
@inquisitortr7930
@inquisitortr7930 5 лет назад
How we write transfer function directly.Can someone explain?
@anaseshmawi568
@anaseshmawi568 4 года назад
you need to use algebra and etc
@harithagb5514
@harithagb5514 4 года назад
There's a separate video on that, I think it's lecture 18
@zinhaboussi
@zinhaboussi 5 месяцев назад
who tried to find the transfer function but stopped and didn't finish it xD
@vancart47
@vancart47 4 года назад
until this video there was no ads but in this one there is like ads for every 5 minute. is that same with you guys or only me ?
@shaleensingh2333
@shaleensingh2333 3 года назад
No
@sangeetsarang7136
@sangeetsarang7136 2 года назад
Same
Далее
Inside Mark Zuckerberg's AI Era | The Circuit
24:02
Small Signal Amplifiers
57:53
Просмотров 325 тыс.