Reagan - "Rendezvous with Destiny" 

and so begins the thousand years of darkness

I worked as a volunteer for his reelection campaign as a young Republican in college. I loved Reagan BUT he took a really big shit on some a bunch of really good Americans who were in need of help!

+Lenin M. Plazas Teddy, of course certainly not Franklin D.!

Where would Trump rank?

Now we do

@@Priddyboiicrls meh... not so much. Hi, I am from the future, and the last president of America did nothing to fight covid tyranny. January 20th 2021, the death of America, cause he couldn't fight back against the race war of 2020.

​@@Priddyboiicrlslmao.

President Reagan in his prime was just crushing it. He was old school handsome. No doubt.

no… they are two opposites

@@kalebh1075 he's the closest thing to Reagan we'll ever see agian.

trump would of given Putin Ukraine on a silver platter. He is a giant coward.

Anthony DePalma lol moron

I wish

+Andrew E You are a remarkable imbecile. You bring new dimensions to moron. I am amazed your knuckles are able to tap on that keyboard. Or, did you minder do it for you? Just after she cleaned your jobbie? Here is what he said. Not that it will help you much since you seem to understand very little except; hot, cold, thirsty, hungry. "Admittedly, there's a risk in any course we follow other than this, but every lesson of history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement, and this is the specter our well-meaning liberal friends refuse to face -- that their policy of accommodation is appeasement, and it gives no choice between peace and war, only between fight or surrender. If we continue to accommodate, continue to back and retreat, eventually we have to face the final demand -- the ultimatum. And what then -- when Nikita Khrushchev has told his people he knows what our answer will be? He has told them that we're retreating under the pressure of the Cold War, and someday when the time comes to deliver the final ultimatum, our surrender will be voluntary, because by that time we will have been weakened from within spiritually, morally, and economically. He believes this because from our side he's heard voices pleading for "peace at any price" or "better Red than dead," or as one commentator put it, he'd rather "live on his knees than die on his feet." And therein lies the road to war, because those voices don't speak for the rest of us. You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin -- just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well it's a simple answer after all."

+Jim Parsons why did you start off with a slew of hatred? Christ was for peace at any cost, remember. I know it's not simple to understand or to act, but we can try. Don't be filled with such vitriol. Shit.

Andrew E that is incorrect, let me help you with a direct quote from Jesus own words: “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’ He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for My sake will find it." Matthew 10:34‭-‬39 NKJV