Real Reason Hitler Lost World War 2 

europe soft under bally

Oversimplified

Oversimplified

And then died of a lung hemorrhage

Oversimplified

just whatched the movie and read about the story surrounding the whole process. I was fascinated. Didnt learn anything in detail from my schooltime

@@UndisputedONE2 which movie?

@@dileepreddy9478 the imitation game

Lions led by donkeys

Happening in America now

@@RossFennell 🎯

@@sigmazhukov4897 Lack of good leadership is world wide pandemic... Lol

@@RossFennell exactly, which scares me . Not a doom and gloom type , but let's be honest. We are in for dark time's.

Agreed and the had a pact so they were allies

Stalin planned an invasion of Europe. If I remember correctly one of the reasons why they encircled so many Russian troops early in the war was because the Russian soldiers were formed up for an offensive.

@@nocapdribblezz6183 Stalin was Hitler's only opponent in Europe. In 1938, a non-aggression and friendship pact was signed between Great Britain and Germany. In the same year, the Munich Agreement was signed between Great Britain and Germany, in which Great Britain allowed Germany to seize part of Czechoslovakia. In the 1935 Naval Pact, Britain allowed Germany to take back its navy. We should also not forget about the "pact of four" in 1933 between Germany, Italy, Great Britain and France. These countries wanted to subjugate the whole of Europe to their hegemony. If you're a Westerner, I wouldn't be surprised if you're hearing all this for the first time...

Documents were planted to Gestapo in Russian citating how Stalin was planning to attack Germany first.This was very nicely faked documents made from British secret agency also supplied so that it looks like a Russian secret agencie made a flaw.Ultimatelly Britian could avoid Hitlers invasion and win the war on the cost of 27 million Russians dieing for their cause.

@@Anonymous-qj3sf well thank you for teaching me that part 😂 (western)

Oversimplified

@hampter112 yeah I thought that too! Lol 😆

Just like ...... Putin with Ukraine...paranoia included

Grandios ideas not thought through enough and a denial of the value of wise women and their ability to untangle possibilities

In the case of the British, it's pertinent to note that the entire Empire contributed to their survival, and later on the Americans came..

@@adhirbose9910 yes I know the UK had its massive empire of like a billion people but I didn't include that

Never attack the russians when they are drinking their vodka

EXACTLY. Even more, forced labour will never meet the economic output and quality like free willed labour for a mutual cause.

And they went up against 2 continental powers and an empire

@@119beaker yeah... they failed for many reasons lol

​@@user-zi1hq9ni7c

@@megancrager4397 true

Thats what caused the U.S. to be the main superpower after ww2, most of the major economies of the world had their infrastructure destroyed

@@delrhok4105 the us was headed there regardless

THERE IS NO GOD BUT ALLAH THE QURAN IS THE BOOK OF ALLAH SURAH IKHLAS In the name of Allah, the Entirely Merciful, the Especially Merciful. Say, He is Allah, [who is] One, Allah, the Eternal Refuge. He neither begets nor is born, Nor is there to Him any equivalent

@@ridwanfaysal7935 You do realize that the word Allah is the same as using the word God. Right?? The Islamic word Allah is the same as the Christian word for god

Same thing is true today for China and Russia. All Russian manufacturing is in the west close to Europe and Chinese manufacturing is on their east coast vulnerable to sea attacks by subs, while the US has infrastructure throughout the country making manufacturing possible on both coasts and the middle.

Arrogance won’t get you far

@John Grigg how similar they are

@@thathabsfan1431 It's interesting because all these "dictators" have a lot in common, it's like they are made from the same mold.

@@RuiLuz because they’re

All good leaders need a 2nd opinion and to see both sides of the problem.

I majored in history in college and the most I've ever read is Rommel said he would avail himself to the new government. He knew it was going to happen but yes he talked to his son before he was taken away in a staff car. Patton was furious when he was told the truth and he made sure the family was taken care of. They lived where he was military governor in Baveria.

Given they think the USA were the main allied country in the North Africa campaign it certainly isn't the historical content.

I like historical

That's the assumption. No one definitely knows what the 2 officers said when they were alone with him in the living room but it's very likely what was said.

@@revolver_84 both of those others reported their discussion. They have the order to give the offer from Himmler. The Germans kept such detailed records to thankfully helped to literally hang them.

@@revolver_84 several good books have photos of the orders and testimony of both of the other two.

I highly doubt he could have "won". I mean, he might have won in Europe but do you imagine him stopping there? I don't see any successful conclusion without him eventually fighting Russia, Japan and the US. He was too much of a megalomaniac. Now maybe if he took them on one at a time, but eventually any remaining powers have to recognize he will break his word to anyone as soon as it suits him to do so. So whatever powers remain would ultimately join forces if for no other reason than to defeat him.

@@Robert08010 understand your valuable point but I seriously doubt whether anyone else would've stood against him after this onslaught. I mean, he would've become even more stronger after this victory.

@@personenkenzahl IF there was anything left after his "victory". Remember what happened in Russia.

But attacking the Soviets was the whole point of the war. So you're saying, they could have won the war if they did not start it.

Yes, he probably could've won against the British by forcing them into a stalemate after winning in North Africa. No, he could not invade the UK, please don't bring that up. But if there was only a victory in the West then would it really be a world war. And also, who's to say that Russia wouldn't eventually attack Germany at one point.

lol

Actually I think it's two since in some videos another voice is heard, tell me if im wrong tho. Am i?

​@@speedyanimatez7276 you are srry😅😅😅

Nah he probably was painting that day his teacher discussed Napoleon.

Japan had a similar problem. The war they fought was on too many fronts, against too many opponents without the industrial infrastructure to support it.

Like modern day Republicans.

@John Grigg that's basically what I said. Yes he was insecure about his lack of an education. As many people would be if surrounded by experts. How they react to this will be different for each person.

@@JCavinee more like liberals and democrats voting for biden just becusse they didn't like trump and now regretting that they voted for him

@@JCavinee I think you misspelled Democrats

@@JCavinee oof

Didn’t make sense not to live for fun

Your brain gets smart but your head gets dumb

So much to do so much to see all the way in the back seat

You'll never know if you don't go

You'll never shine if you don't go, hey now you're an all star.

Maybe that was because unlike the German military the Italian one kept failing under their fascist plans from the start and had to be bailed out by the Germans regularly

Yep

It's a lot better

Russia was not a state that time

@@shayaldwarka7907 True, it was called the kevian Rus back then. But it doesn't change the fact that they were the only invaders that successfully subjugated Moscow.

@@Huang_Yisen Sad Polish-Lithuanian noises

Mongolian: Hold my Yak Milk

@@gnas1897 why everyone forgets about him?

Echt? Das wusste ich noch gar nicht

Essentially correct he wasn't against Jews he was against Israelites. If an Italian Jew saw themselves as Italian 1st Jewish 2nd he was fine with them.

Of course its incorrect, and genocide wasn't the reason any nation was for or against being his ally. That idea is utterly false and simply childish and not based on real history. It shows that the video maker has never studied Geopolitics.

Was about to comment that he did the same thing Napoleon did and it wasnt even that long ago

My grandfather, Norman Douglas Smith, was a cargo pilot for World War II during the clash with Japan and he lived till his 80s before his death. Last time I saw him while he was close to being on a deathbed, I was 21 and I did attend his funeral the following year. Kudos to such a wonderful grandparent.

Yeah Britian put up a danm good fight and .any do t recognize that

They had to invade the sovj'iet union

I think after Pearl Harbor the US was going to be all in. I am not sure his declaring war changed much. Would we have focused entirely on the Pacific if he hadn't? I have my doubts. Too much was at stake in Europe.

The invasion of the ussr is a must, the ussr was gonna invade in 1942 and Britain is not gonna give up, like how the USA was not gonna stay there. I heard that American and German ships were already shooting each other by autumn, if this was true then it was only a matter of time

Insert Bismarck joke here.

This is canon

Spittin' facts!

No because of Indy securing the Lost Ark.

Are you talking about Rudolph Hess? He flew West because he was trying to secure peace with England before the invasion of Soviet Union. Soviet Union was a threat to England as much as it was to Germany. He was arrested and jailed.

No cap

True

No. Hate NEVER lands on the right side of history. Gassing millions of innocent people would never look good no matter what.

Yep. In the grand scheme of things; it's all absolutely meaningless, because people love to lie and make stuff up.

We all would be speakin german... Zu sagen ist es klar,dass die Geschichte zu alle gehoren, die erfolgreich sind

The overwhelming majority of this was from 1944-1945. Literally 80%. The USSR had strategically defeated the Axis by 1943. American mechanization helped speed up soviet tempo in the late war, but did not change the ultimate outcome.

Yeah, but Soviets were much better than USA

😂😂

Bro please don't fail art school

@@reginaldcopperbottom1738 i'll try not to

Progress....??

Welp... WWIII seems to be on the schedule. Just need to get you into some trench warfare!

oil

there is no point to make propaganda lies about japanese

@@Sukulieh I don't have to explain if you know history

@@vladislav1069 I understood

The Maginot line was designed to force Germany through Belgium and bring Britain - who had guaranteed Belgian independence for a century by then - into the war, not as some impenetrable defence right up to the channel

He was actually super smart with an IQ of around 170 but he became over confident and narcissistic. Maybe sycophantic a little.

Convicted? There was no trial i was aware of.

Yaaaa

Clownler was dumb for not fearing that Stalin would destroy him.

Well, he made so many errors with his reckless decisions that cost his army during WW2. He underestimated Stalin & the Soviets and that was his downfall.

@@45wasright43And that makes him an idiot for his whole life? Even the Union in the Civil War lost major battles. Was General Grant an idiot? Get a clue.

Facts

They were never high. the only way Germany could have achieced a quick victory against Russia is if they surrender. They could not have gained Moscow due to not doing Halders strategy, Stalingrad was virtually unwinnable even if Germany had more men there. Germany NEVER could have even made a victory, let alone a quick one against the soviets. Kursk was unwinnable too due to the Soviets having 5 times as many soldiers and good fortifications, and Germany usually only won battles against the soviets when they werent ready, but at Kursk they were. Germany was doomed

By the time the Battle of Kursk came along, the war was already on the Soviet's side.

Some histirians say turning point was as early as August 41. The Russian resistance was much more than was anticipated and the Germans were starting to fall behind schedule. Definitely by the start of Kursk there was no way German was going to defeat the Soviet Union.

A quick victory in Russia is impossible.

Besieging Stalingrad would also have cut off the river through it

Wait fr?😂😂

And how do we know that this isn’t propaganda? They could be just failed attempts

@@antonioljubicic9420 that's common knowledge. How have you never heard that??

@@jeffreyval9665 Nope. As a history entusiast, I got a little surprised, but to me that just sounds like a propaganda, to make fun of him

@@antonioljubicic9420 I don't care

Ngl I have never even heard Australia mentioned in the world wars, I just assumed they stayed on their continent and let everyone do their own thing. I'm gonna look this up now thanks c:

@@j8246 I could be wrong but pretty sure most wars America has fought in Australia was there and today I think there’s even a treaty between the 2 countries that pretty much say americas wars are Australias and Vice versa. But I could be very very wrong on that lol can’t remember where I heard/read that

And the Oil and Manpower shortages

No

But the oil in the middle east was only in its infancy

You realize the invasion of Soviet Union was NEVER about oil or any other resource? The Germans had enough resources of their own. Germany invaded because it was becoming quite clear that the Allied powers were funding Soviet's army into a massive offensive force to take advantage of the weakened countries due to the prolonged war that Churchill the warmonger wanted so badly. Germans stationed at East Prussia could clearly see a massive force of Red Army soldiers amassing at the border in preparations for their invasion of Germany and Western Europe. The allied powers knew the full extent of Soviet Union's intention to invade and conquer the weakened Western European states and it was coming (if as Stalin had hoped) as Germany invaded Britain or not, either way they were going to invade Germany. You really oughta listen to his speeches, you would understand why he invaded Soviet Union and sent peace offers to Britain beforehand to end their unnecessary war and stand with Germany against the Soviet menace, and not some propagandist piece on RU-vid who gets his information from the already questionable history told by the victors of WWII.

Of course, he literally decided to go against THE only 2 countries and armies that shouldn’t be F’d with.

@@natethegreatndt5711 he would have crushed Russia one on one.

@@dylonmc4323 Possibly, but he got cocky and thought he could take on both of them.

@@natethegreatndt5711 yes, that's exactly right. It seems he became so confident because of his easy victories over Poland , France and others and because he actually wiped out the entire western Russian army down to less than 600 tanks in Moscow, destroyed the entire Russian airforce and it's economy all within 3 months. Japan had alot of success at that time as well so he probably assumed Japan could hold off the US long enough for him to finish Russia. He did not see lend lease helping Russia rebiuld so many army's and tanks. Then the Germany first policy began to wipe out the German economy hammering oil supplies and resources.. Then the US landing an entire army in Africa during Stalingrad didn't help much.

@@dylonmc4323 Russia crushed him one on one.

Here to say this

wasn't Dresden the city firebombed and almost completely turned into ash...? Of course Hamburg was bombed but pretty sure Dresden is the more memorable one for incendiary bombing.

could they not just blockade the railways too

When you see the german military cross on the planes bombing "pearl harbor"

Quite, as they used modern day borders, comepletely destroying the point of education in that factor, as they used german aircraft for pearl harbour scene, if germany had no idea of the invasion whatsoever, and modern day borders would force the ceding of danzig to be impossible as germany didnt have konigsberg, and since russia is comepletly cut-off from russia they couldnt invade them, as belarus and ukraine stood in the way. I agree with your statement, and it really is sad.

or the mud

Never underestimate an empty fuel gage

There info can be wrong alot of times, if you watch other historians and look at the Internet the info you get is different to this show but I agree its interesting watching this channel

this channel could teach a lot, but i reallly can spot a few giant problems with this video, such as Borders, aircraft designs, and just a small amount of accuracy, but it really can make up for it with the actual content

😃

But expanding east was thé main goal of the war. If they don't do that, then it's no longer world war 2

Maybe after I think operation compass if I'm correct but the Americans did land in north Africa If I remember correctly

I think that was later in 1942, a year or two before the north African campaign started.

@@eli8922 operation compass was british. The americans landed in operation torch.

Good spot. Thats what I thought when I noticed the American flags too. It was predominately British troops defending in North Africa aswell as Free French troops.

And mechanized also they didn’t have many cars and tanks to get around

@John Grigg as long as nukes are a thing a direct confrontation with China probably wouldn’t happen. Plus, both China and the US fuel each other’s economies, it would be economical suicide if the two went at it

true but another huge factor was the allied breaking of the german enigma code.thus, the allies usually knew exactly what the german plans were.

I respectfully disagree. The US Army activated all National Guard and Reserve units after the fall of France. Intensive training was initiated and men who could lead were sent to officer and NCO training programs. In early Pacific Battles mostly prewar us troops usually out fought the Japanese.

@John Grigg same

Love this channel? Bro are you in your senses ? They don't make thier animations first of all. They purchase vectors from shutter stock. Their content is repetitive. Nothing special, same things all the time.

Education? The general idea maybe, if you open one book you will find a lot of mistakes here and in almost every video. They prefer quantity over quality.

@@eliasl332 Prove those 'mistakes.' make a more accurate RU-vid series or STHU.

@@machupikachu1085 I don't have the time for that but I see only good in warning others of what is happening here. If you want to learn another at all read books, this easy solution you have here is only to entertain 9 year olds. Or at least if you are that lazy subscribe to Mark Felton.

@@eliasl332 "I don't have the time for that..." you're too important to tell the truth? Gotcha! One RU-vid channel - genius truth sayer This RU-vid channel - manipulative sociopath Thanks for clearing all of that up! You've been so helpful! Pro tip - if you truly want to help society CREATE something, don't just sit back and say "You're doing it wrong!" Otherwise, your credibility is nil. Cheers!

Because he thought the UK could still be an ally

The Germans were literally out of gas and coming down from their amphetamine highs. They couldn't advance.

A theorised reason was using the Dunkirk encirclement as a bargaining tool to get an easier peace deal with the allies by using the trapped troops as hostages

What difference would it make? The allies could replace the men. And France fell anyway.

@@leonpaelinck If he hadn't halted the ground troops at Dunkirk. The war would have certainly last a lot longer and the body count much higher.

I believe that if Stalin wasnt General Secretary which was entirely possible and Winston Churchill along with FDR not becoming in charge of their respective countries during the war

@@deaddok999 No, Germany could not win no matter what. If another soviet leader was in charge then it would have went better for the Reds. Considering no great purge.

@@HappyChap8 yes but no forced industrialization and Lenin's plans for state capitalism which would force the soviets to industrialize in the late 1930s which would be FAR too late

Well the Germans can actually won if Japan dint attack pearl harbour,Germany attacked Soviet sooner and clearing North Africa first

@@yapperbird Yes but the thing is that Japan was still genociding Chinese people's causing an embargo against them which provokes Japan to do pearl harbor

Sad but true. Once the Russians reached Berlin and the German soldiers knew it was over, most of them made a break for the west to surrender to the Allies rather than get captured by the Russians.

Russian POWS had a worse survival rate believe it or not .The Germans basically starved them to death . Well the men anyway Worse for the women

@@dbunch904 Im pretty sure they brought the civilians with them too, and if they did it was truly a heroic act that should be respected.

Dresden was HEAVILY bombed. Very true

samosamo

Rommel is a very over rated general he was a good front line commander i ww1 and a good tank commander in the invasion of france but he hade a very big ego and saw him self as the greatest commander in the world he underestameted the britsh and he over estameted his own forces capablitis and made alot if big mistakes that cost him the african campaine

I think it has more to do with Russia being so big, requiring long supply lines and longer to get to the cities. Otherwise it wouldn't have taken so long and they'd be done before winter came