Тёмный

RECAP: How did The Dali Ship crash into Francis Scott Key Bridge? 

WRAL
Подписаться 217 тыс.
Просмотров 2 млн
50% 1

A cargo ship lost power and rammed into a major bridge in Baltimore early Tuesday, destroying the span in a matter of seconds and plunging it into the river in a terrifying collapse that could disrupt a vital shipping port for months. Six people were missing and presumed dead, and the search for them was suspended until Wednesday morning. The ship’s crew issued a mayday call moments before the crash took down the Francis Scott Key Bridge, enabling authorities to limit vehicle traffic on the span, Maryland’s governor said.
Here's what to know about the cargo ship Dali that crashed into Baltimore's Francis Scott Key Bridge, causing it to collapse and leaving six bridge construction workers presumed dead. If stood upright, the Dali would reach almost to the top of the Eiffel Tower in Paris or about two-thirds of the way up the Empire State Building in New York. It can carry the equivalent of almost 10,000 standard-sized metal shipping containers, and at the time of the accident was carrying nearly 4,700 containers. But while those figures are impressive, the Dali pales in comparison to the world's largest container ships, which can carry more than 24,000 containers. There are environmental and economic advantages to operating giant container ships, but their sheer size and weight make them difficult to maneuver and stop - especially when something goes wrong.
(Credit: WBAL, WJLA, STREAMTIMELIVE, NTSB via CNN Newsource)
0:00 Latest on the Baltimore Bridge Collapse Investigations
1:48 Simulator - How the cargo ship could have collided with the bridge
4:49 The Importance of Cargo Ships to the World Economy
8:02 U.S. Supply Chain in Limbo after the Francis Scott Key Bridge Collapse
Subscribe to WRAL:
/ wral5
News Tips:
Online - www.wral.com/report-it/
Email - assignmentdesk@wral.com
Follow WRAL:
Facebook: / wraltv
X: / wral
IG: / wral
About WRAL-TV:
WRAL is your Raleigh, North Carolina news source. Check out our videos for the latest news in Raleigh, local sports, Raleigh weather, and more at WRAL.com
#nationalnews #baltimore #maryland

Опубликовано:

 

26 апр 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,8 тыс.   
@rustynuts89836
@rustynuts89836 29 дней назад
Prayers to the 6 contract workers that perished. It's scary to think what they went through
@LaughingSkull451
@LaughingSkull451 27 дней назад
Another bot 🤡
@srv14evr
@srv14evr Месяц назад
So heartbreaking...for Baltimore...and especially for those 6 workers who perished and their families whose lives are forever changed.
@CoreyMac_Productionz
@CoreyMac_Productionz 29 дней назад
heartbreaking...go read a novel...this is an attack by your government
@user-pb1mc4ex5x
@user-pb1mc4ex5x 29 дней назад
I doubt that six people died. More than 50 cars fell into the water. The media, as always, are lying
@Hillary4SupremeRuler
@Hillary4SupremeRuler 29 дней назад
@@Mosssflower I think the commenter understands that...hence "those 6 workers who perished"
@Hs5687
@Hs5687 29 дней назад
Tragic … Insurance Fraud cannot be Ruled Out…
@jeffhobbs3948
@jeffhobbs3948 29 дней назад
No the bridge was not clear of traffic ,There was only 90 sec.from the warning from he boat and the collapse.
@FreeMindsWillWin
@FreeMindsWillWin 27 дней назад
We demand a full investigation. Nothing redacted, all names named, all information made public
@andyhowat4624
@andyhowat4624 29 дней назад
Man takes for granted what's free. Environment, health family. We only value what cost money
@jennag3226
@jennag3226 28 дней назад
All those things cost money😂 nothing is for free
@yikesmcgee-gz3lq
@yikesmcgee-gz3lq 28 дней назад
That what I’m talkin bout
@ericsimpsom4417
@ericsimpsom4417 28 дней назад
Only 1 thing money can’t buy. It can buy love, happiness, etc but no matter what, it can’t buy you time. Everything takes money. We all know that. The key is finding a job or business that’s treats you great and u like what you do and suddenly, making money is easy.
@jjameson929
@jjameson929 28 дней назад
I value my faith it's free ..and my life
@yikesmcgee-gz3lq
@yikesmcgee-gz3lq 27 дней назад
Absolutely dominating
@duran9664
@duran9664 29 дней назад
Solution is extremely simple: 2 tug boats should escort cargo ships until they clear the whole areas & bridges. Greedy ports & shipping conglomerates don’t want to pay extra for the mom & pop owners of many of the tugging boats! 😡
@YoboYT
@YoboYT 29 дней назад
You realize the entire run from Port to sea is 100 miles right?
@prateekbhatt5444
@prateekbhatt5444 29 дней назад
What he means to say that two to three tug boats all the time standby at such crucial position at all times to avoid such situation. If tug boats are standby such situation can be take care before situation run out of control. Imagin no cost for loss of life. 191 mil dollars a day for port cost. So many people at work at port. All this is nothing compared to 3 tugs standby near bridge all time for such situations. I believe it la not just vessel to be blamed. It’s also port control. Why can’t they foresee such emergency might happen. I believe they do have a team to forsee such incidents that might happen.
@DB-thats-me
@DB-thats-me 29 дней назад
Ummmm…the ports would charge for them but, you, the public, will pay for them.
@jbrown4137
@jbrown4137 29 дней назад
​@prateekbhatt5444 the ship would need to stop prior and attach to the tug boats, then be escorted through. Tug boats return and repeat. It's not just hey I am near if needed and when you lose control we can try and get it under control then. Also that cost would not be cheap and simply passed on to the consumer. No simply solution as in "oh just do this its no issue". And you likely would need no less then 6 to 12 tug boats to make sure all ships are covered both directions.
@TK0_23_
@TK0_23_ 29 дней назад
@@harley2die4 Absolutely. And you pay for the fuel and labor cost.
@DevilDogDen1775
@DevilDogDen1775 28 дней назад
1: Ship loses power. 2: Ship can't stop. 3: Ship hits supports. 4: Bridge collapses. THAT'S how it happened.... BTW, I AM NOT being SERIOUS.....
@Zboarts1990
@Zboarts1990 28 дней назад
Yea. And don't ask any questions.
@Macarena22279
@Macarena22279 27 дней назад
Thank you
@bernym4047
@bernym4047 26 дней назад
Port authority deems it unnecessary for large cargo vessels to be towed beyond the bridge into open water by tugs. This is not a cost saving measure. It's merely to give the tug crews more time to play golf. 😉
@denzkiezeir5393
@denzkiezeir5393 26 дней назад
Captain's nationality? A big human error
@elenaferreiramaia
@elenaferreiramaia 26 дней назад
Ship can't stop, because there were no "defenses" in each pile of this bridge. Incredible. I search very carefully in Google Earth and the defenses do have a very poor design and they are very distant from the pile. Incredible mistake.
@rahulvinalnarayan9743
@rahulvinalnarayan9743 29 дней назад
I’m sorry, it is indeed appropriate to discuss previous incidents occurring from this shipping company..it makes us better understand the culture of incompetence and negligence they have
@snakeoids1
@snakeoids1 29 дней назад
I knew it
@dnb_brett_breezy
@dnb_brett_breezy 29 дней назад
Just like boeing planes they do discuss their previous incidents why not this ships history and lives were lost 😢
@mikeylazovich3262
@mikeylazovich3262 29 дней назад
You mean Maersk? It happens, it comes with the territory of running a shipping company. If you are wondering, it's pretty dumb to assume that they'd destroy a structure on purpose considering all of the cargo that container ship was carrying. They did call may-day to clear the bridge and the captain on board and the pilot have to answer questions.
@mikeylazovich3262
@mikeylazovich3262 29 дней назад
Also Maersk is a Danish Shipping company and a pretty reputable one at that.
@joseph-mariopelerin7028
@joseph-mariopelerin7028 29 дней назад
The thing is; ship are expected to fail.... instead of blaming the whole industry, put device in every ship have 2 tug on every boat....and make shipping cost go up... pouring concrete island in front of pillars is just too simple I guess...
@Doodlebirds1
@Doodlebirds1 28 дней назад
The way that fell down like a house of cards is utterly horrifying
@joeturner7959
@joeturner7959 26 дней назад
That is basically why the bridge cost so much less. To over build a planter box, not much of a loss, but... to under build a bridge? It was up for decades. It just was not designed to take a full on container ship, ( which weighted in at 1/4 the ***entire*** bridge... )
@fannyluuu
@fannyluuu 29 дней назад
It breaks my heart they still haven’t found the workers
@janetphillips2875
@janetphillips2875 28 дней назад
Well, I think they know their whereabouts, they just cannot get to them until some of the steel, concret, and cables are removed.
@virtualmartini
@virtualmartini 23 дня назад
in America: a ship crewed by Indians collapses a bridge ending six foreign workers. What happened to all the Americans?
@erict7867
@erict7867 29 дней назад
Worst thing that can happen to a ship (other than a fire) is to lose power. You have to look at why it lost power
@JohnleBonReturns
@JohnleBonReturns 29 дней назад
On your list of 'worst things that can happen to a ship', where does *sinking* rank?
@colliswilliams8992
@colliswilliams8992 29 дней назад
The same reason gas pumps never work correctly at certain gas stations. The owners are cheap.
@keyjam9
@keyjam9 29 дней назад
Why it went hard right when the power came back on?
@michaelcalland801
@michaelcalland801 29 дней назад
@@JohnleBonReturns I think he was referring to a “floating” ship
@pk3
@pk3 29 дней назад
Oh they have to look at why it lost power? Omg.. Did you come up with that idea on your own? You’re a genius.
@tiskodi
@tiskodi 28 дней назад
The engines were in full reverse at the time, which is why the ship didn’t go straight through the pillars and kept on moving. It is like trying to stop a car going down hill on ice. Also, on ships like these, when you lose power, the rudder doesn’t work anymore. The reason why they were turning is because the channel is a left turn out. Which is why the rudder was pointed left to begin with. The rudder is motor powered so when they lose power they can’t change the angle of the rudder which is why they kept turning. And for everyone saying they need tugs, they did. They had 2 which let it feel when they hit the standard speed. They also have pilot that boards the ship only for the trip out then he gets off again. They are the most skilled drivers of the port so the actual captain wasn’t piloting the ship when it crashed. It also doesn’t help that the ship was in an accident 4 years prior and sustained damages to the rudder which were never fixed. This is just a weird coincidence and accident. We’ve seen it before. Know your facts.
@liamwinchester8398
@liamwinchester8398 23 дня назад
This bridge has been very special to me. I live right next to it. I remember before my dad died. We went on the bridge and we saw the nice view. They didn’t have to do this to my last memory of my dad.
@shellyaus
@shellyaus 29 дней назад
A similar thing happened in Tasmania 3 years before this bridge was built, traffic is now stopped when large ships approach on the new bridge
@eagles4eva05
@eagles4eva05 29 дней назад
I live on the island of Atlantic city in nj and same here on our small bridges. Traffic is stopped so bridge can raise up for boats to pass thru
@NateInDC
@NateInDC 28 дней назад
I live in the DMV area and have driven across that bridge on a few occasions, once drove across while a cruise ship was passing underneath, and was a little afraid of what would happen if the ship hit the column, I made it across before the ship passed, that shipping port is huge and very busy with cargo ships and cruise liners, prayers to the families of those workers.
@listen2music811
@listen2music811 26 дней назад
I live in the DMV and have been across the Key Bridge and many many times over decades, the Chesapeake /bay bridge..talk about scary! God was with me ..I never gave driving across a 2nd thought . As above, prayers for the families of deceased workers..God Bless their souls.
@Tech9xt1
@Tech9xt1 29 дней назад
RECAP: loss of power and no bridge protection.
@tammyallen8205
@tammyallen8205 29 дней назад
You got that right. So, true.
@109sssss
@109sssss 29 дней назад
change that to poor chip maintenance and no tugboat escort
@WaaDoku
@WaaDoku 29 дней назад
Kinda weird that one of the biggest ports in the entire US didn't have any proper bridge pillar protection installed.
@MsDancer50
@MsDancer50 25 дней назад
Maybe Under ground tunnels prevented installing better pillar protectors? Just guessing.
@jarelprecila599
@jarelprecila599 29 дней назад
Where is the ship's captain's interview?
@Jonathan-mt9up
@Jonathan-mt9up 29 дней назад
Guess those years of collecting tolls to pay for ‘taking care of the bridge’ didn’t include installing protective concrete dolphins.
@Rozwell007
@Rozwell007 29 дней назад
Preeeeaaaacccccchhhhhh
@DB-thats-me
@DB-thats-me 29 дней назад
Tolls go the roading authority, dolphins are the pervue of the Army Corps.
@cattnipp
@cattnipp 29 дней назад
Yep, it went to DEI stupidity
@QUICKBOOKS1
@QUICKBOOKS1 29 дней назад
Another phrase I had never heard of. Thank You!
@nikostalk5730
@nikostalk5730 27 дней назад
a non-spent dollar is an easy-saved dollar
@gerrycoogan6544
@gerrycoogan6544 26 дней назад
Why was the ship heading in the wrong direction in the first place, even before the apparent power failure? It shouldn't have been anywhere near the bridge. It should have been heading out to sea.
@bwelc0076
@bwelc0076 24 дня назад
It was heading out to sea.
@silviaflores791
@silviaflores791 29 дней назад
SO SORRY FOR ALL THIS
@henrysantos121
@henrysantos121 29 дней назад
Rip all victims souls.🙏. And my full condolences to all family members and friends involved, Really sad and heartbreaking,
@kenpryor4440
@kenpryor4440 29 дней назад
The united states shouldnt foot the bill for a new bridge the ships owner should pay it all if it has to sell all its ships and assets so be it if we was to hit something in our cars our insurance would have to pay
@DB-thats-me
@DB-thats-me 29 дней назад
Ok. One of your friends borrows your car and crashes it into a building. Should you pay? After all, it’s your car! This ship is owed by one company, leased to another, flagged to a third country, crewed by yet another country and carrying goods from everywhere else. Good luck suing anyone!
@syncmonism
@syncmonism 29 дней назад
There would be a maximum amount for any policy though, and the ship's insurance policy likely has a maximum payout that isn't anywhere near the cost of replacing this bridge.
@bfa-xi1py
@bfa-xi1py 29 дней назад
BS, the ships owner only has to pay for the economic value of bridge that was almost 0 dollar. USA always waits to let an accident happen, and let others pay. USA will give a blanket to the people who lost loved ones in this incident. The bow of ship hits pillar andf then pier stopped ship, completely absurd. A shame for a country, not for a banana republic like USA of course.
@Johnnie223
@Johnnie223 29 дней назад
The country needs a replacement bridge asap. Too many jobs at stake. Other business comes after this has been started.
@doreenstodolski615
@doreenstodolski615 29 дней назад
Sleepy joe just blowing smoke As Always, Deter-Deflect
@duncanmcgoo4891
@duncanmcgoo4891 29 дней назад
The bridge supports were left unprotested in a huge busy Cargo port...No-one ever thought of pouring concrete collision guards that would deflect the ship back into the channel?
@JBTYpr
@JBTYpr 29 дней назад
I’m not sure what kind of barrier would effectively deflect something that huge and heavy, effectively a skyscraper on the water. Even with barriers in place this may have still happened, even with all that I tend to agree that something would have been better than nothing.
@robertandlizforever7862
@robertandlizforever7862 29 дней назад
Our tampa bridge has them look it up there built 100 foot from the piles and about 20 foot concrete circles
@Paul1958R
@Paul1958R 29 дней назад
If you watch this NTSB yt video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-CwgOHpZlxvc.html you can see that there were four (two at each main span concrete support, one on either side) round (20 ft diameter ?) structures in the channel. At two:fifty five in that video you can see one just on the starboard (right) side of the ship. I assume these were intended to deflect a vessel heading toward the supports. They are not very large - especially in relation to the size of that container ship so I have no idea how effective they would be if the ship even struck it. You can also see that towers for power lines parallell to the bridge also had barriers.
@maiden5427
@maiden5427 29 дней назад
That bridge came down like lego, a complete redesign of the bridge is the only thing that would have made sense to me
@lizbethartemis4886
@lizbethartemis4886 29 дней назад
since 2015 increase size of mega cargo ships without modernizing bridge. Ever Green got stuck there. it took weeks to dredge around and free. Greed - mega ships, fewer trips, & less marine gasoline.
@alekseyadrianov8941
@alekseyadrianov8941 29 дней назад
The bridge pillar had to be protected by a sandbank, so that no deep-draught ship could bump into it. The bridge itself should not be a single piece prone to avalanche collapse.
@MrUranium238
@MrUranium238 29 дней назад
I love how everyone on the comment section are bridge and ship experts Edit: I myself am a deep-sea submersible expert when it come to carbon fibers ---
@IntenseShot
@IntenseShot 29 дней назад
Just theories
@duncanmcgoo4891
@duncanmcgoo4891 29 дней назад
I love how people are allowed to discuss their personal theories and opinions
@vesstig
@vesstig 29 дней назад
@MrUranium238 shut it
@freddieNyack
@freddieNyack 29 дней назад
mayor Pete is.
@reynaldomadolaria8139
@reynaldomadolaria8139 29 дней назад
you this by an engineering intelligence , where you can connect matters in science. However, an ordinary poorman can think this like. But in an extreme xases, where axts of God is now in despair, no one except superman can do this.
@darylshanley2674
@darylshanley2674 29 дней назад
Can anyone show me how a ship with that momentum turned so much please lol
@darylshanley2674
@darylshanley2674 29 дней назад
Redact that lol for a moment I forgot about the souls that lost their lives
@mikeylazovich3262
@mikeylazovich3262 29 дней назад
No steering
@prateekbhatt5444
@prateekbhatt5444 29 дней назад
Since she was still moving the momentum was there. As soon as power restored they used hard over the rudders and emergency astern engines. Since container ships have powerful engines reacted fast and with momentum and wake the ship turned to stbd so quickly. But sadly again power loss left them with no hand and limbs to fight the war. Suggest they shud have maintained course and speed to allow vessel to steer under the bridge. Could have a good chance to sail out safely under as ship had momentum good 10-15 were manageable. But this is easy to say after the incident happened. Putting in such situation I guess they did best under such emergency. Panic and situation. Hats off to all crew onboard. And RIP for the souls who left this world. Learning lesson shud be ship managers and owners to avoid cost cutting for vessels. Ports to start spending money on tug boats and other means. Surprisingly most ports in world are short of proper power tug boats.
@faithhowe6170
@faithhowe6170 29 дней назад
They were without steering, at the mercy of winds and water currents, and they dropped an anchor. The reason for the turn can be for any one or a combination of these. The NTSB will figure it out.
@crystalo.4929
@crystalo.4929 29 дней назад
Rudders stay the course it was set for even without power, someone had to manually stir the boat into the beam...per a Navel supervisor with years of experience.
@boricuaspr
@boricuaspr 29 дней назад
Not an expert, but I believe that bridge with that high of ship traffic should have had better protection knowing it was an old design that could not hold an accident with today’s ship.
@lizbethartemis4886
@lizbethartemis4886 29 дней назад
since 2015 receiving larger and larger cargo ships and Ever Green hot stuck there. 10 ships have gotten stuck leaving that port.
@evilpotatoman9436
@evilpotatoman9436 29 дней назад
protection does nothing against a ship of this size, literally nothing. This is a case of they got too greedy with ship size and now we pay the price, you either accept bad luck every few years or change ship sizes back to "normal".
@davids.2703
@davids.2703 29 дней назад
"No bridge pier could withstand being hit by a ship the size of the Dali, said Benjamin W. Schafer, a professor of civil and systems engineering at Johns Hopkins University."
@themistoklis6237
@themistoklis6237 29 дней назад
Or train pilots not to aim for the bridge supports as they had out. How about the middle section where there is plenty of room.
@duncanmcgoo4891
@duncanmcgoo4891 29 дней назад
Yes it does. Ships can be deflected rather easily @@evilpotatoman9436
@everythinglidd
@everythinglidd 29 дней назад
Prayers for everyone ❤
@user-vy5rs1rh4n
@user-vy5rs1rh4n 28 дней назад
What a wild coincidence the way the boat seems to make hard turn right into the worst spot 🙏 for all victims
@fjb3544
@fjb3544 29 дней назад
Ok so then why are the taxpayers paying for this?
@amossimon3438
@amossimon3438 29 дней назад
The ship went throught maintance check.up. Just before the ship ran into the main section of the Bridge. That took it down.. . Couldn't drop emergency anchor. ..Sounds little fishie to me.
@JakeTurbine
@JakeTurbine 29 дней назад
Weren’t most of the crew Chinese? 🤔
@michaelcalland801
@michaelcalland801 29 дней назад
@@JakeTurbine Ukrainian Pilot …… Just another coincidence though
@williammitcheltree8788
@williammitcheltree8788 29 дней назад
I was afraid that I was the only one who wondered WHY the Anchor wasn't dropped when the first power loss occurred !!
@JakeTurbine
@JakeTurbine 29 дней назад
@@Ramjeet_PooInTheStreet_ I seem to be hearing conflicting details on the crew. I’ll have to look into it myself this evening if I find the time.
@michaelcalland801
@michaelcalland801 28 дней назад
And 2 minutes of Data is missing from black box… Just another coincidence.. As is power failing at that exact moment.
@AnotherBlackGuy100
@AnotherBlackGuy100 29 дней назад
Absolutely devastating. So sorry for their losses
@sumguy01
@sumguy01 29 дней назад
Man, they really wrapped this one up quick, huh? Hardly mentioned the casualties. Guess they can build their new bridge now.
@notworthit1096
@notworthit1096 29 дней назад
That’s what Im thinking too. They had the perfect opportunity and went for it.
@aseasonedtrucker431
@aseasonedtrucker431 29 дней назад
No according to Biden us taxpayers are going to pay for it and not the Dali’s insurance
@Techmatt167Official
@Techmatt167Official 29 дней назад
And guess who’s paying for it all!
@wesleeysutton5935
@wesleeysutton5935 29 дней назад
Its sad atleast they did it during maintenance imagine rush hour...its crazy how are government does this though its not the first time either
@micaheller6426
@micaheller6426 29 дней назад
Definitely intentional, by who I don’t know.
@lindaross783
@lindaross783 29 дней назад
Ships have gotten too big for bridges built years ago
@bfa-xi1py
@bfa-xi1py 29 дней назад
Nonsense, this bridge had a not protected pier, in 1980 a ship also did hit pillar with bow, but then it only chipped pillar. This time, bow of ship destroyed pillar and then pier stopped ship, absurd. 100% proof a pier with protection would have stopped ship, bow would never have hit pillar.
@jimpowell2296
@jimpowell2296 29 дней назад
I believe the harbormaster and the captains of each ship are the ones responsible for safe passage. Would they not have certain things you do for all scenarios coming in and out of the harbor, day or night.
@bfa-xi1py
@bfa-xi1py 29 дней назад
@@jimpowell2296 That is why they protected bridge in Florida after accident with bridge did happen? In this case bow did hit pillar, boat should have hit pier first. Lot of damage far above water line, that should never have happened, with a wider pier bow would never have hit pillar.
@moggpiano8043
@moggpiano8043 29 дней назад
​@@bfa-xi1py No. The two situations cannot be compared. This is a full face direct hit by a huge vessel not even thought of in the 80s. Bigger and heavier ships are being built all the time, how can you constantly upgrade bridge defences across the world, every time a new monster takes to the sea? A 1977 bridge versus a 2015 vessel. No contest.
@Aaron-dp5kb
@Aaron-dp5kb 29 дней назад
No there were tugs to help these ship in harbor. If there was a tug this would have never happend
@jaydewitte2958
@jaydewitte2958 29 дней назад
I pray for all those who lost loved ones. I also pray for those who have no idea who Francis Scott Key was. Do better, America!
@mauricioweber8879
@mauricioweber8879 28 дней назад
Best report on the issue out there..complete with a quick simulation and all. Thumbs up
@janetphillips2875
@janetphillips2875 28 дней назад
Bless those families❤
@brucea550
@brucea550 27 дней назад
A little late now. Doubt they feel very blessed. What would you suggest?
@reynaldomadolaria8139
@reynaldomadolaria8139 29 дней назад
Does the section of the anchor is also dependent on the main engine of the ship as weel as the steering wheel of the ship.
@nikostalk5730
@nikostalk5730 27 дней назад
dunno how it works, but this must work as handbrake on a car, with no power and anything to rely on
@MakeArtNotWar2023
@MakeArtNotWar2023 29 дней назад
This could have been avoided if concrete dolphins were installed to protect the supports for the bridge. See the 1980 Sunshine Skyway bridge collapse in Florida and the solution to that problem
@davidjones-vx9ju
@davidjones-vx9ju 29 дней назад
don't blame the bridge
@moggpiano8043
@moggpiano8043 29 дней назад
There are "dolphins" there. The vessel just rode over them. The real problem is...... How do we upgrade every bridge, everytime someone builds a bigger, heavier ship?
@bfa-xi1py
@bfa-xi1py 29 дней назад
@@moggpiano8043 Nonsense, it did miss a dolphin and then bow did hit pillar. Same did happen in 1980 with same bridge , but then bow did just "chip" pillar, a bit different direction and perhaps bridge would have collapsed then. The pillar is not made for collisions. The pier later did stop ship, you can see it everywhere on video. The pier was not wide enough, damage can be see far above water line.
@AlexDrewsumin
@AlexDrewsumin 29 дней назад
These ships are 2-3 times larger than the ones in 1980.
@robertkerr8734
@robertkerr8734 29 дней назад
Right ! 40 years ago and nothing was learned.
@glenwallis2366
@glenwallis2366 29 дней назад
Why were they sailing so close to the bridge support anyway?
@JenniferSchumacher-rx8ri
@JenniferSchumacher-rx8ri 28 дней назад
Because it was on purpose
@jimtalbott2894
@jimtalbott2894 27 дней назад
What timing the ship loses power only when it gets close to the bridge. It's kind of funny. 😂
@Macarena22279
@Macarena22279 27 дней назад
​@@JenniferSchumacher-rx8ri🤡🤡🤡
@Macarena22279
@Macarena22279 27 дней назад
​@@jimtalbott2894well I'm glad you can laugh
@SyniaWillis-qk1ji
@SyniaWillis-qk1ji 29 дней назад
It hurts deep down as I was on that ship year2022😢
@user-rf3cn2ou3x
@user-rf3cn2ou3x 29 дней назад
It looked like it was made of match sticks !
@lizbethartemis4886
@lizbethartemis4886 29 дней назад
that bridge was open in 1975. Not built for mega cargo ships.
@Gullah_James1962
@Gullah_James1962 29 дней назад
Yes, I am not an expert but that bridge do look like it was weld together/ builded in the cheapest fashion..!!!
@RichardCourtney-
@RichardCourtney- 29 дней назад
@@Gullah_James1962 Yes, you are not. The construction was fine. Park your "builded" garden shed on some train tracks, and let's see what happens.
@kevinmach730
@kevinmach730 29 дней назад
@@RichardCourtney- "No, you are not"
@wolf44875
@wolf44875 29 дней назад
😂
@shaylafon6671
@shaylafon6671 29 дней назад
Why wasn’t the ship going in the direction of going under the bridge instead it looks like it was hit intentionally and where are the workers of the ship? What do they have to say?? 🤔🤔🤔🤔
@johnmills837
@johnmills837 28 дней назад
Navy needs to take charge and direct efforts
@lonnieburkes8166
@lonnieburkes8166 28 дней назад
There should be something in place around all bridge supports that keep vessels this size away from pilons, make them pay the tugs into the channel or keep them away from the supports!!!
@KnowledgeEnthusiast
@KnowledgeEnthusiast 29 дней назад
USA govt and Baltimore Govt official statement says that Fortunately just because of the Indian Crew onboard has made SOS message to Authorities about power failure of the cargo ship within time, it enabled them to avoid a lot of potential life threatening scenarios.
@amandawatkins4447
@amandawatkins4447 29 дней назад
6 people lost their lives. 4 families grieving without bodies they may never get back. It happened in the middle of the night when most are in the bed. This is already terrible what more can happen but of course the government gonna come and act like a savior. The government did this that ship curved and headed straight towards that bridge. I would hope by now most eyes are open that the us government always “secretly” doing thing behind our back
@Ramjeet_PooInTheStreet_
@Ramjeet_PooInTheStreet_ 29 дней назад
Hindu never misses an opportunity to pat himself on the back.
@Bennie32831
@Bennie32831 29 дней назад
Tug boats are used in our Port All the time and we don't have a bridge 🤔
@duran9664
@duran9664 29 дней назад
Solution is extremely simple: 2 tug boats should escort cargo ships until they clear the whole areas & bridges. Greedy ports & shipping conglomerates don’t want to pay extra for the mom & pop owners of many of the tugging boats! 😡
@davidulmer9774
@davidulmer9774 29 дней назад
I don't know what ports your in, but working offshore in Lousianna, Mississippi, Alabama, and Texas, I don't think I've ever seen tug boats bringing boats in. Seen them with some jackup drilling rigs and a few boats that lost power, other than constantly moving barges. Not saying they don't some places, but I haven't seen it.
@NCMCPlantier
@NCMCPlantier 29 дней назад
Tug boats are used here also. They had just released this vessel being away for from the docks. The Captain had called for them when power went out. There just wasn’t enough time before impact
@darvinclement8404
@darvinclement8404 29 дней назад
I’m shocked it took this long before it did!
@JP71165
@JP71165 29 дней назад
So the Pilot made all the right calls, Really?? If he had done the right thing from the Get Go, it wouldn't of been a News.
@whaleriderthewatcher5875
@whaleriderthewatcher5875 29 дней назад
The Government should put in place a stricter law which states all vessels that gos under a bridge must be accompanied with a tugboat to present and the companys must pay for the service for the safety of both sides safety is the issue
@arthurhernandez8937
@arthurhernandez8937 29 дней назад
Bigger issue is the bridge poor design, it had no pylon barriers to protect bridge from collision
@bfa-xi1py
@bfa-xi1py 29 дней назад
Why not protect a bridge? The bow of ship did hit pillar, pillars are not made for collisions. The pier was not wide enough. In 1980 another ship did hit same bridge, with bow it dfid "chip" pillar, bit different direction of ship, bridge would have collapsed as well.
@destructionman1
@destructionman1 29 дней назад
You gonna pay for that?
@themistoklis6237
@themistoklis6237 29 дней назад
How about not planning to graze the supports as you head out? Why sail so close to the supports.
@arthurhernandez8937
@arthurhernandez8937 29 дней назад
@@themistoklis6237 they lost power it seems and were just along for the ride couldnt change course
@ridgemanron
@ridgemanron 29 дней назад
How could these huge ships not have escort tug boats encircling them when nearing bridges?
@RichardCourtney-
@RichardCourtney- 29 дней назад
Insufficient regulations. They very well may need to be required to do it from now on.
@B501R
@B501R 29 дней назад
Where's the ship's captain. Did he fled???
@elaineweinberg7094
@elaineweinberg7094 29 дней назад
I live on the Delaware I see tug boats assisting all the time.
@frost_spirit3314
@frost_spirit3314 29 дней назад
@@B501R the ship lost power what's bro supposed to do
@RichardCourtney-
@RichardCourtney- 29 дней назад
@@B501R You mean flee? The port captain is on board until he/she turns control over to the ship's captain. Port captains are experts in local conditions and hazards. This is normal in every large port in the world.
@Leeta
@Leeta 29 дней назад
But why was the ship headed that far right in the first place? Are you saying that it WAS centered between the pillars and, when they lost power, the ship just swerved all the way to the right?!
@andrewmcarthur3843
@andrewmcarthur3843 29 дней назад
Ya.Didn't look centered at any point
@ThresholdGaming
@ThresholdGaming 27 дней назад
Rule 9 - Narrow Channels (a) A vessel proceeding along the course of a narrow channel or fairway shall keep as near to the outer limit of the channel or fairway which lies on her starboard side as is safe and practicable.
@ThresholdGaming
@ThresholdGaming 27 дней назад
@@andrewmcarthur3843 Rule 9 - Narrow Channels (a) A vessel proceeding along the course of a narrow channel or fairway shall keep as near to the outer limit of the channel or fairway which lies on her starboard side as is safe and practicable.
@listen2music811
@listen2music811 26 дней назад
Devastating because Baltimore has had so many major problems in the past decade or more. I just gave up going there after the Inner Harbor became dangerous and no longer a tourist draw. Just a major crime hub for the state--sadly--Maybe this will bring the city back . And just think of the jobs lost in addition to the workers who lost their LIVES just going to work---Families, their children, wives, grandparents ---just heartbreaking.
@danarbuckle6640
@danarbuckle6640 29 дней назад
The real challenge is getting the insurance to pay after your president has already said he is paying 100% for the new bridge.
@syncmonism
@syncmonism 29 дней назад
The insurance company doesn't get released from their obligation to pay just because some other party offers to pay, and, believe it or not, the US federal government has a lot of bargaining leverage and isn't easily bullied by an insurance corporation. It's implicit that Biden was only committing to pay whatever doesn't get covered by insurance.
@jo0123
@jo0123 29 дней назад
Insurance takes time, they will have to pay eventually.
@barbwire4879
@barbwire4879 29 дней назад
It's Biden. He thinks he has a credit card with JOE Biden. I'm on in RU-vid jail. Now. !!!! It's the truth
@lawrence809
@lawrence809 29 дней назад
Oddly the cost of the bridge is the same amount the Ukraine needs.
@bfa-xi1py
@bfa-xi1py 29 дней назад
They will only have to pay for an old bridge, not a new one. Besides, bridge was not protected, bow did hit pillar, should never have happened, pier was not wide enough.
@tammyallen8205
@tammyallen8205 29 дней назад
I was reading that the River there is 50 feet deep.. That's another reason why it's been hard to Recover the Missing Road Construction Crew.
@bwelc0076
@bwelc0076 24 дня назад
It's dredged periodically to maintain that depth. There are plans for bigger ships.
@warriorfb2010
@warriorfb2010 29 дней назад
"This is all a simulation... but we have a REAL captain" lol. Had me fooled.
@Sandhillduck
@Sandhillduck 29 дней назад
I've been on some big jobs and I can't believe they let ships that big go through there without tugboats they're not allowed to go under the bridge without a tugboat not even get close to it without a tugboat should I say tugboat again
@FalconXE302
@FalconXE302 28 дней назад
I thought that interesting also. Where I live, TWO Tugboats follow each and every ship IN and OUT the port until they reach the ocean, or are docked.
@nikostalk5730
@nikostalk5730 27 дней назад
saving money of excessive safety, this is how big money works
@Jockinoz
@Jockinoz 29 дней назад
the problem is easily explained. This ship loses power. it doesn"t have any control whatsoever.
@michaelcalland801
@michaelcalland801 28 дней назад
Then how did it make a sharp right turn directly into the bridge support.? At the EXACT right moment !
@nikostalk5730
@nikostalk5730 27 дней назад
@@michaelcalland801 well, i think is kinda RWD car issues on ice. Not much to do, but you have to chose. When you are already in a slide, anything you'll do - will end up with collision, anyway, the possible change is - which side will suffer more, the front, the side, or front+side.
@aprilbennett7277
@aprilbennett7277 27 дней назад
This is so emotional saying a prayer for the families 😇💜RIP
@stevewhalen6973
@stevewhalen6973 29 дней назад
Thanks!
@user-qn7iw7ee7c
@user-qn7iw7ee7c 29 дней назад
ensure seaworthiness before leaving the docks. the bridge was constructed to withstand the weight and load of vehicles and not the impact of a collision with a more or less 100,000 ton ship at harbor speed with no breaks.
@mikekraan823
@mikekraan823 29 дней назад
The bridge was built taking ships into consideration from the 1970's. They are obviously much larger and heavier today than they were back then. And the are BRAKES, not "breaks", and no, ships don't have them.
@harleighquinnmekyra
@harleighquinnmekyra 29 дней назад
We've had that bridge for YEARS & anybody that live here or in the area knows not to take that big a** ship under that bridge.
@mikeylazovich3262
@mikeylazovich3262 29 дней назад
It's a cargo ship
@gomez2724
@gomez2724 29 дней назад
Apparently you never see a cargo ship go in or out of the port?
@patrickdenegri9115
@patrickdenegri9115 29 дней назад
It’s a commercial port. It’s a cargo ship. I don’t know what bridge you’re referring to, but ships that size have been navigating under the FSKB for 50 years. The fact this is their first catastrophic event in half a century is more of a testament to the port authority than it is an indictment. It’s a tragedy and could have been avoided. But the size of the ship has as much to do with it as the color of the shirt the captain was wearing.
@yikesmcgee-gz3lq
@yikesmcgee-gz3lq 28 дней назад
It’s just a cargo ship. It’s not that big compared to mega ships. 🚢 🛳️
@dansanger5340
@dansanger5340 28 дней назад
How would cargo ships access the port facilities built to service them without going under the bridge?
@withtheshitzpodcast416
@withtheshitzpodcast416 29 дней назад
I love how the video now starts after the ship bust that right smh
@tms372
@tms372 29 дней назад
That Miguel guy should just go home, what a dork.
@MissTJ516
@MissTJ516 29 дней назад
He seems young and learning, why so rude?
@fairwaycaddy18
@fairwaycaddy18 Месяц назад
no mention of the bumpers placed to protect base of bridge
@MakeArtNotWar2023
@MakeArtNotWar2023 29 дней назад
There weren't any concrete dolphins installed there, that's why. That's surprising for such an important port on the east coast.
@DB-thats-me
@DB-thats-me 29 дней назад
⁠even with dolphins, 100,000tons, 8 knots….probably same result.
@bfa-xi1py
@bfa-xi1py 29 дней назад
@@DB-thats-me No, pier did stop ship. But first bow of ship did hit pillar. Lot of damage far above water line, in 1980 another ship did hit bridge, but then bow only did "chip" pillar, but different direction and perhaps bridge would already have collapsed then. When a ship is deflected, the water displacement does increase, water does become friend to stop ship.
@cliffbyrum3534
@cliffbyrum3534 29 дней назад
It was an accident. Just like if your car broke down on the highway. Asking ‘how can we prevent this from happening’ is completely ridiculous. You can’t prevent any and all accidents from happening. Much like news reports like this.
@bfa-xi1py
@bfa-xi1py 29 дней назад
BS, a wider pier would have stopped ship as in fact the pier did, but bow did hit pillar first and the pillar is not designed for collisions.
@ohsweetmystery
@ohsweetmystery 29 дней назад
If the captain had responded appropriately and immediately dropped anchor at the first power outage, he would have had four minutes to try to stop. Instead he waited for several minutes before dropping anchor.. This is just incompetence and it could absolutely be used as a lesson to prevent future accidents.
@guguigugu
@guguigugu 29 дней назад
in every accident we ask ourselves how to prevent it. this is how safety is improved.
@terezjordon2290
@terezjordon2290 28 дней назад
It’s called a debriefing; the entire team comes together and discusses what went wrong so changes can be made to prevent better future outcomes. That’s how process improvement works. This is common sense to most professionals. It’s also good to practice scenarios like this so tasks become a natural instinct during an emergency situation.
@doobiedoo157
@doobiedoo157 28 дней назад
Use Tugs to control ships going near bridges or build correct pillar buffers and banking
@adambirman2379
@adambirman2379 24 дня назад
In addition: these ships are so large and move so slow, they do not rely on the rudder entirely. They have side thrusters. So a loss of power is a death sentence.
@mixflip
@mixflip 29 дней назад
So no tug boats are used at night?
@himayamata
@himayamata 29 дней назад
if the ship blacked out, they should have drop the anchor
@lolzlolz102
@lolzlolz102 28 дней назад
First of all they did drop anchor, secondly anchors are not designed to stop a moving ship of that mass. Given enough time and space you could knock speed off (providing the chain isn't ripped from the ship) but those are two things they didn't have!
@BrentStAmant
@BrentStAmant 29 дней назад
And yes I do know a little something about this because I’m a towboat captain and have 43 years experience
@Nopaants
@Nopaants 29 дней назад
“Careened helplessly out of control” remember when we had journalists who spoke unbiased facts without sensational assumptions?!
@themadoneplays7842
@themadoneplays7842 29 дней назад
Eh to be fair I would use similar terminology considering what we know so far about what happened. I mean, stopping a shipping vessel isn't like trying to apply brakes to a car. Its not just the engines that can move a ship forward.
@Nopaants
@Nopaants 29 дней назад
@@themadoneplays7842 to be fair would be to not make assumptions about a situation without knowing the facts. There is zero evidence at this time to state the ship was out of control. Deliberate or a mistake means the ship was in control but no evidence either way so don’t put misleading assumptions in people’s heads especially when it’s the media’s responsibility to report facts not opinion. That’s fair.
@themadoneplays7842
@themadoneplays7842 29 дней назад
@@Nopaants well how would you have described it then without it sounding "sensationalist?" I'm morbidly curious.
@Nopaants
@Nopaants 29 дней назад
@@themadoneplays7842 well gee?! I’m not a journalist! Oh wait, it doesn’t matter. “The latest goal is piecing together the final moments on board the ship just before colliding with Baltimore’s Key bridge.” Just the facts.
@timwalling3101
@timwalling3101 29 дней назад
lose power lose control what else do you need to know
@user-jc8rz2jj9r
@user-jc8rz2jj9r 29 дней назад
I think it’s ‘lose’ not loose.
@davidjones-vx9ju
@davidjones-vx9ju 29 дней назад
why did it lose power?
@timwalling3101
@timwalling3101 29 дней назад
@@davidjones-vx9ju still waiting like everyone else on that one ah
@michaelcalland801
@michaelcalland801 29 дней назад
@@davidjones-vx9ju At that exact moment
@oleanderson3693
@oleanderson3693 29 дней назад
Why, after the bridge strike in Tampa Bay in 1980, did they not recommend and fund dolphins at critical bridges? 44 years later and how many bridges are still unprotected?
@RADARTechie
@RADARTechie 29 дней назад
I was on the USNS Navajo (T-ATF 169) towing the ex-USS Coronado when we lost power at sea. We started slowing down, but the much more massive ship behind us didn't. If we didn't have rudder control we would have been run over. Even if they had rudder control, they would have had a hell of a time trying to get that insanely massive ship turned/stopped.
@bigcmac8006
@bigcmac8006 29 дней назад
I don’t understand why the ship was even over there in the first place, like shouldn’t you wanna be close to middle
@Mikee535
@Mikee535 29 дней назад
That was my question too
@rachelmackrell9891
@rachelmackrell9891 29 дней назад
I felt the same way. Why did they go that way to begin with?
@michaelcalland801
@michaelcalland801 29 дней назад
You would think… But asking questions is forbidden… They already told us…” Mechanical Error”,,, “ No terrorism”…! And that was before they even examined the black box. Just nod your head & obey
@ThresholdGaming
@ThresholdGaming 27 дней назад
Rule 9 - Narrow Channels (a) A vessel proceeding along the course of a narrow channel or fairway shall keep as near to the outer limit of the channel or fairway which lies on her starboard side as is safe and practicable.
@ThresholdGaming
@ThresholdGaming 27 дней назад
@@Mikee535 Rule 9 - Narrow Channels (a) A vessel proceeding along the course of a narrow channel or fairway shall keep as near to the outer limit of the channel or fairway which lies on her starboard side as is safe and practicable.
@bsrcat1
@bsrcat1 29 дней назад
They aren't going to rethink the size of the ships... That would disrupt the flow of commerce It would be cheaper to rethink the bridge designs. Cargo vessels are no different than commercial trucks and the car that you drive. You can do all the maintenance in the world but sometimes s*** happens. Piloting a large vessel is similar to driving a car with bald tires on ice. They don't have brakes, no action you take with regards to propulsion or navigating is seen immediately. It takes time for any large motor vessel to react to your input strictly because of the gross tonnage, the lack of friction that all vessels have due to physics and an object in motion wants to stay in motion... The more mass and object has in motion the longer it takes to change direction or momentum. This was just worst case scenario from top to bottom. Sometimes s*** just happens. They can find out what the cause was... They can check the fuel tanks make sure that there was no water. Check the fuel pumps. Check the human factor. You can see in the video, the times, when the EGT kicked off and when they restarted the mains. They were all within SOLAS and US regulations. There's a few things that I don't get, like they only dropped one anchor... If you have a major casualty you drop both. If you only drop one you created a pivot point that you can swing and that's the last thing you want to do when you're that close to something you can hit. Nobody has said who made that call but the recorder will let us know. Was it the pilot, was it the master? Just understand they were very limited given when the casualty occurred when it comes to options available to rectify or correct. Those of us with experience can all play armchair quarterback. Like I said I would have dropped both anchors and I would have done it sooner. Yes it would have delayed departure. Yes there would be an investigation and we'd have to turn back around and more up but it's far better than this. The main thing is that we learn how it happened, why it happened make new legislation to prevent it from happening in the future and I'm sure that international regulations will change depending on the outcome of the investigation
@syncmonism
@syncmonism 29 дней назад
Probably this is not just a matter of bad luck, but it's possible. Likely there is at least something to be learned from this which can help to make it less likely to happen again in the future.
@davidjones-vx9ju
@davidjones-vx9ju 29 дней назад
thanks mr wizard
@lukequigley121
@lukequigley121 29 дней назад
UNFORSEEN events befall us all..
@JeffroNoNothing
@JeffroNoNothing 26 дней назад
That only dropping one anchor also bothers me. Not saying it's the case but perhaps they only had one crew member to let loose the anchors and he only had time to do one and not the other (dependent on how close the release mechanisms are to each other). But I'm kind of thinking anyway that it was already too late even if both anchors were dropped, even if simultaneously. For the moment, it looks like the crew, including and especially the harbor pilot, pretty much did everything properly that they could do (apart from leaving port with faulty vital equipment and insufficient maintenance, if they were aware of it). It's that the timing was awful. It all happened so late that a difference could not be made even with all the emergency measures they took. The only question then is if they could have made them any sooner to make a difference?
@bsrcat1
@bsrcat1 26 дней назад
@@JeffroNoNothing I am kind of surprised that given how close the bridge is to the moorings for the harbor that it's wasn't a COTP requirement to at least have one tug if you're over x amount GWT.
@DavidJohnsonFromSeattle
@DavidJohnsonFromSeattle 29 дней назад
Why was it pointed towards the pillar right before it was going to hit it?
@CHARLIEC-lb4kw
@CHARLIEC-lb4kw 29 дней назад
Are the engine controller and generator controllers hackable from outside the ship???
@Bennie32831
@Bennie32831 29 дней назад
Incompetence
@prateekbhatt5444
@prateekbhatt5444 29 дней назад
Above your knowledge level and understanding.
@blueeyedsoulman
@blueeyedsoulman 29 дней назад
The ship is stacked so high it didn't even look like it could pass under the bridge.
@davidbhart1867
@davidbhart1867 29 дней назад
It absolutely could. How do you think it got into the port in the first place?
@blueeyedsoulman
@blueeyedsoulman 29 дней назад
@@davidbhart1867 Without the containers.
@BethB2010
@BethB2010 29 дней назад
The ship's bridge is easily in full view over top of the shipping containers. Use your brain, stop saying goofy things.
@blueeyedsoulman
@blueeyedsoulman 28 дней назад
@@BethB2010 So why not drop the anchors? Something's not right here. How did he get on a trajectory straight for the pylon?
@BethB2010
@BethB2010 28 дней назад
Dude take the tinfoil hat off. They did try that but it was too late. Trying to stop that couple hundred thousand ton ship on a dime is literally impossible. It already had forward momentum when it lost power. The amount of drag/energy that would need to be exerted to pull it to a stop is unimaginable. Those in control of that ship did everything they could to prevent as much loss of life as possible. Called mayday immediately and begin multiple attempts to regain power and steer away from the pier of that bridge. It is a tragedy that there wasn't more time to tell those working on the bridge. But traffic was halted which saved so many lives.
@mononoke813
@mononoke813 29 дней назад
Prayers for the crew who lost their lives and prayers for the trafficked humans in the containers who will probably die before being recovered 🙏
@hojinna6396
@hojinna6396 29 дней назад
Negligence for sure... Mr. George
@elmonteslim3711
@elmonteslim3711 29 дней назад
An overloaded, badly maintained cargo ship crashed into an unprotected bridge. Sounds pretty simple to me
@Robertsusamade
@Robertsusamade 29 дней назад
lol
@Why_is_everything_taken.
@Why_is_everything_taken. 29 дней назад
Not overloaded. Not unprotected.
@robertmcmillan5640
@robertmcmillan5640 29 дней назад
I have so many sarcastic comments to make right now , but not gonna go there because there are lives lost . My Heart goes out to these people
@eagle25311
@eagle25311 29 дней назад
Your heart can't go out it has to stay in or you'll die.
@listen2music811
@listen2music811 26 дней назад
Please...no sarcastic replies. YOu don't know the full circumstances. Man lives were saved because of ht SOS sent by the crew.
@listen2music811
@listen2music811 26 дней назад
What does that mean! Very stupid remarlk..not amusing at all during thi situation@@eagle25311
@letspartyallthetime
@letspartyallthetime 27 дней назад
The amount of containers, and that's only one of countless, just wow
@JT-xh4zm
@JT-xh4zm 29 дней назад
One news agency stated that the pilot had requested tugs for the departure. The request was denied.They should ask the person who denied the request why they made that decision. I believe this might have been prevented if the tugs had been used.
@Bennie32831
@Bennie32831 29 дней назад
Incompetents
@dand7772
@dand7772 29 дней назад
At 4000 feet distance to the bridge, any attempt to stop by reversing thrust or lowering an anchor was foolishness. If the captain had done NOTHING, then the ship would have remained on course and proceeded under the bridge without incident. It is possible that a crew member intentionally sent the propeller to reverse. This reversing CAUSES a swerve to starboard with any rudder movement necessary. BTW, losing power causes the rudder to remain in the same position (close to centerline)
@tacobell7541
@tacobell7541 29 дней назад
Wasn't a infrastructure bill passed a couple of days prior to the incident ? I believe now they met the requirements for getting grants from the infrastructure bill.
@virginiabushnell3042
@virginiabushnell3042 29 дней назад
The caption on this reads: “How could this happen?” I will tell you how: POWER
@danamiller6049
@danamiller6049 29 дней назад
Or lack of power.
@SRunni_
@SRunni_ 29 дней назад
That bridge fell like a house of cards
@alansmithc6669
@alansmithc6669 29 дней назад
Shows the vulnerability of US infrastructures. Looked what happened to the railroad last year and now the bridge.
@cindyhabigturley5784
@cindyhabigturley5784 29 дней назад
I believe it was no accident. I think the shipping company should pay for rebuilding this bridge and sued
@atg1338
@atg1338 29 дней назад
No accident? What happened then Mr. Know it all🤔
@filler7359
@filler7359 29 дней назад
he's like "nah ima drive into this bridge idec bro"
@darby5987
@darby5987 29 дней назад
Your belief is based on what hard evidence? With your permission, would it be OK if we allow the NTSB to conduct a professional investigation and publish its report before we keel haul the Captain, administer 100 whip lashes before the mast to the helmsman and pilot and confine the owner to prison for life, demand they pay for the bridge and then sue them? Hey, it's just a suggestion based on, Oh...I don't know...the owner Captain, harbor pilot and the crew's 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 14th Amendment protections against deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law and equal protection of the law? Rights such as jury trial, right to legal counsel, right to call their own witnesses, right to cross examine witnesses against them?
@doompod
@doompod 29 дней назад
Negligence is still considered an accident. There’s currently no indication the ship was intentionally driven into the bridge to cause collapse.
@atg1338
@atg1338 29 дней назад
@@darby5987 He's a maga voter who has no facts!
@kurbads74
@kurbads74 29 дней назад
In 1970s container ships could not collapse a bridge by touching one of its supports.
@Why_is_everything_taken.
@Why_is_everything_taken. 29 дней назад
Search up the tasmanian bridge collapse.
@Ronin4614
@Ronin4614 29 дней назад
Why were they off course, and so close to that bridge support? There were local pilots onboard as required yet they still are seen way too close, why?
@ThresholdGaming
@ThresholdGaming 27 дней назад
Rule 9 - Narrow Channels (a) A vessel proceeding along the course of a narrow channel or fairway shall keep as near to the outer limit of the channel or fairway which lies on her starboard side as is safe and practicable.
@brianheikes1025
@brianheikes1025 29 дней назад
The "Black box" was never in danger of being lost and it was not physically removed. The data was downloaded onto a flash drive. The NTSB has a flash drive with the last 30 days of data
@Hillary4SupremeRuler
@Hillary4SupremeRuler 29 дней назад
Then what was that thing they were showing us
@Jerock216
@Jerock216 29 дней назад
No explanation as to why the ship turned sharp right to hit the bridge support directly!!
@ExecutiveGuardian
@ExecutiveGuardian 29 дней назад
It’s all part of the plan
@S.P.01
@S.P.01 29 дней назад
No one is going to reconsider the size of these ships.. Transportation cost matters.
@PatsFanAlways4Life
@PatsFanAlways4Life 29 дней назад
Rip to those who lost their lives that faithful day and i wish the best for their family and for the workers and knowing that they are in a better place now. RIP may god be with them.😢😔
@talltimbot
@talltimbot 29 дней назад
Most likely reason is remotely controlling the electric bow & stern thrusters to immediately steer ship toward bridge support
@samsanimationcorner3820
@samsanimationcorner3820 29 дней назад
No sir, stop it.
@atg1338
@atg1338 29 дней назад
So basically you have no clue!
@user-yn7ld2hi1i
@user-yn7ld2hi1i 29 дней назад
The captain is fully incompetence, inexperience and negligence, why he did't drive the ship through the middle of the two pillars of the bridge despite the weather and the sea was favourable.
@Why_is_everything_taken.
@Why_is_everything_taken. 29 дней назад
He did everything he could do.
@ThresholdGaming
@ThresholdGaming 27 дней назад
Rule 9 - Narrow Channels (a) A vessel proceeding along the course of a narrow channel or fairway shall keep as near to the outer limit of the channel or fairway which lies on her starboard side as is safe and practicable.
Далее
Golden Gate Bridge | The CRAZY Engineering behind it
15:28
когда одна дома // EVA mash
00:51
Просмотров 1,6 млн
Manam boraman🤣
01:01
Просмотров 979 тыс.
How Did A Ship Destroy Baltimore's Key Bridge?
4:30
Просмотров 759 тыс.
What caused the Power Failure : The Dali Incident
23:47
Engineer reacts to Baltimore bridge collapse
6:46
Просмотров 1,1 млн
когда одна дома // EVA mash
00:51
Просмотров 1,6 млн