Red Dead Redemption PS4 (via PS5) Review - DIFFICULT TO RECOMMEND 

Basic fact checking isn't really a strong suit for most RU-vid "content creators". Their idea of acceptable journalism is very low, if they even consider what they do as being journalism in the first place.

@@chrisbgoodv2178as a journalist myself, looking to work on something gaming related, this is sadly true.

Yes, you are right. Isn't it crazy how rockstar used to release a masterpiece almost year after year, they got max payne 3 in 2012 and L.A noire 2011

@@chrisbgoodv2178I mean, no one is immune from simple mistakes though, like mixing up a date. Could this have been easily corrected? Sure. But anyone who has ever recorded content before knows how easy it is to slip up from time to time. Gamingbolt always puts out pretty trustworthy content, and to me, that’s more important than expecting perfection every video.

@@historical_radish4069 it's people like yourself that perpetually excuse lax standards, that ensure those standards will remain lax. My point remains valid, despite your attempt to dismiss it. Basic fact checking should be a pre-requisite before releasing information. I suppose you obviously come from a generation that foolishly believes that correction is somehow a form of harassment.

I would’ve bought it for sure

ill wait till its free or on sale for $5, r* can go eff themselves

The sad thing is that it'll probably still be a hit at $50, continuing the cycle of bare-bones overpriced ports and re-releases.

@@zgaming6806npcs will pay anything for the same product

@@zgaming6806it was a total flop, Take Two earnings call showed that

Gaming community live to buy re releases and DLC'S.... Retard community

Exactly that's why we're getting nothing new or creative.

@@MikeJAk49baldur’s gate literally just came out

@@yoda9256 And it's a contender for one of the greatest RPGs all time.

They basically do this for a quick fix and then the money goes into GTA 6

You’ll buy gta 6 still lol

​@@djstef4549of course I will Rockstar's main team never fails to deliver on an immersive massive and detailed game

@@djstef4549because it’ll be phenomenal like the last 10 games they’ve released, doesn’t change the fact they have gotten greedy with specific aspects of online and re releases of old games

It is not the same map. Same location but the scale of everything is different.

Company's do own the games and CAN charge what they want. Be happy that game companys are going to past games and bringing them forward. Nintendo are selling 10 year old games on the switch at full price and everybody pays it, so this is not a isolated case. If people want old games on newer platforms them support them when they come out. I bet other game co.lanys are looking at this planning to bring their older titles forward and are now thinking it's not worth the time and money THEY WOULD HAVE TO SPEND on it. You can not want game preservation then complain when someone does the thing everyone wants to see more off. Red dead redemption is one of the few old games that is still worth the full price , it's an amazing open world game with the DLC, it's fun to play and works. It will be one sale in a few months , wait till then to pick it up

​@@CORNERSTONECITY777Case 1 of why the future of gaming looks grim - comments justifying Rockstar's greed... Small indie company Rockstar gets away with an overpriced port because people lap up any slop with the word Rockstar attached to it even when it is far too overpriced. Shameful behaviour.

Just like sheeps line up to vote for Biden or buy the new iPhone.

@@Underdrill people have been spending millions on DLC for gta 5 for the past 8 years. Perhaps the reason why they are charging £40 For rdr1 is because gamers have shown them they can afford to pay it. You can not spend £60 on virtual money for a game then complain about paying for a game.

You’ll buy gta6 lol even though the company has bad practices

target 20.00 right now

Cheers mate

No, don't wait for a fucking sale. Just don't buy this shit at all. Stop giving money to Rockstar altogether and encouraging this kind of stuff

Giving the industry the clear message low effort remasters for a big price are fine.

A lot of people are okay with being ripped off. EA releases the same Madden game every year. Gamers complain but still rush out to buy it. These companies have no incentive to do better when they know consumers will complain but still buy whatever product they throw out.

@21raynard Exactly it could be the buggiest game ever and they will still buy it.

It's one of the best game ever made and it's better than the original port

rockstar hates you and it hates their toxic masculine games of the past that made them famous. it hates being a good company

All the more

Im glad own both Playstation and xbox

Absolutely ridiculous

It looks better than the PS3 version

@@raymondarias2034that’s not saying much

@@Ritzuh it is because the graphics are beautiful

@@raymondarias2034 but still runs on garbage 30fps

on old hardware too, it wouldve been smarter remaking it for $70 for next gen and pc. that's worth the value

Yet the price is remastered

i have no issue with it, enjoying the game

3d tv improves aa?

@@vishaalgargi No it doesn't. This guy doesn't know what he's talking about. The amount of anti-aliasing is handled by the game engine.

You can adjust the saturation and contrast in the video settings on ps3, which I find helps the graphics immensely, but maybe the improved AA is a visual side effect of the 3Dtv, not the game engine.

Its been 4k on XB1X for 6 years mate, rip off.

@@sten2147 It's more of an illusion than actually helping with AA. I've seen a TV that could make films and some games look like they were running higher than the target frame rate.

If it's a masterpiece as is, they shouldn't have to remaster it.

So you're asking for Rockstar to split up its main team who are currently full-steam ahead on GTA 6 to remake this game with rdr2 engine and Graphics from the ground up? Yeah you're smoking crack

@@calijack2006 I am not asking Rockstar for anything, I just think that it is stupid not to use what they have build and modernized in their latest title.

Why don't you just play red dead redemption 2

Good luck getting strauss zelnick fired lol

Alright Karen

STRAUSSSS!

I think that's a bit extreme. It's not really a remaster. Just a port with a few extra languages. Whatever graphical changes there maybe are overshadowed by the fact that the graphics are obsolete. That said the game still holds up for me personally. I heard that they were tossing around the remake and thinking about changing things with the story. If they had changed things in the story for the worst or added some woke nonsense I would have hated it more than this port.

You should finish the first one. I was blown away by it when it first came out. Dutch was apart of the game but he was more mysterious in a way because you as the player still don't know the full story even after beating the game. Rdr2 gave so much more context in a well written way and elevated the first game.

It's $80 here in NZ and it's not available untill mid October.

Like a smart person. It's sad by how many comments of people said they buy it or going to buy it for 50 ..People love that R* D lodged in their throat sad thing too they pay for it to be placed there.😂😂

bro so u only play what’s trending that must suck😂 a remaster makes u want to play it

@@leelee-uq5ui no I already played RDR2 but my Ps3 does not turn on for some reason so I couldn’t play it there and my old pc would not be able to run I just got a new pc this month and when I heard of it coming to PS5 I thought I would play it there but as it turns out it’s just a port for 50 so I just emulated it

@@leelee-uq5uiIt reminded him of playing

Doesn't run well on Rpcs3 even with a "high end PC". But I'm not sure how it runs on Xenia. I'll be honest I wanted to play this game without issues for years so I paid the 50$ just for nostalgia but I know they went in deep on me without vaseline along with many others 😢

I did exactly that and you are right. I literally finished this game 1 week before it came out and was satisfied with the PC emulated experience with high frame rates and anti aliasing.

​@incognito326 You should have saved your money and tried it on Xenia Canary, it runs fine and you can patch it to increase frame rates and anti aliasing all for less then 50 dollars.

No need, shinny graphics, don't make games better.

@danielyoungblood8525 Oh, I meant like any good changes like bug fixes and stability updates. Not even graphical changes. I knew that wasn't gonna happen.

@@d-jams Is the zombie glitch still in the game?

@@danielyoungblood8525no , but 60 fps does and this doesn’t have it. What a rip off.

Imagine caring what other people spend their money on 😆 just let people have their fun with the videogames they want. Quit your bitching and find something to do.

So you think it's ok for developers to take a 13 year old game, take part of it away, and then charge $50 for it? That's an odd take.

​​@@csolivais1979what's the big deal? They can do whatever they want and price it however they want, it's their game. You don't have to buy it if you don't agree. And this is nothing new, Nintendo has been doing this for years and no one cares. LA Noire got ported at full priced and no one cared. TLOU got a full $70 remake last year and people complained. The fact that RDR 1 is a 2010 game is irrelevant, the game still holds up and its still better than most $70 games in the market. RDR 1 is a masterpiece with or without its multiplayer (and the multiplayer was trash anyway). Having the multiplayer for the sake of just having it doesn't add anything to the experience. And you already have RDR Online anyway

GTA 6 will mark 60 years of Grand Theft Auto! GO ROCK STAR! Rocking that shit atari-style!

Better graphics, = more valuable? 😂😂 are you 10?

Stop u will be first to pre order gta6 and starfield at 30 fps

@@acezero12345 Gonna get that GTA 6 sharkcard edition. 😂

@@danielyoungblood8525well yeah better graphics is more value instead of just a port over. It’s really lazy of rockstar to charge full price for a game that’s over 10years old when they haven’t changed anything. If rockstar used RDR2 engine/graphics then I would gladly spend full price

​@@Mattube1983would you pay that for a remake of GTA V?

Yes, I am rebuying this after playing it on the Series X as this is now 60fps which is massive and was not available when this review was done.

Same parent company. They will sell a lot for 50 bucks and when it stop selling they will drop the price. There is cold calculation behind every price in the market.