@m4dn3ss999 Yeah on High and Ultra with at least Medium AA the game looks really good. I really like the graphics style, its a little fuzzy but still detailed.
played the first three missions. The first real combat mission is hard because you don't get the mp40 or gewehr 41, but after that you can clear rooms easily with the mp40 as the ruskies seem to just line up for you xD but itis still alot of fun ^.^
@LordaeronTactics I know this is untrue simply because I am not a "hardcore ass player" yet I still enjoy the Battlefield series while I see COD as a pile of 3 day old, fly-infested horse poop.
@psgchisolm no games don't need to sparkle and be super advanced in terms of graphics, but this game looks like a half life 1 mod and they're charging $40 for it.
@stevebiko2k Ahh the graphics. It's not like this game was created with the purpose of creating one of the most realistic experiences possible. You do know that not everything sparkles and gleams right(especially in combat)? Not to mention one of the most grueling battles of history.
@stevebiko2k What? So you mean a REHASHED game that added better graphics and different killstreaks should cost more than a game that has 20x the features. Explain how that works? Do you understand how long it takes to code something when you have a limited staff and have to factor ballistics, coding a cover system ect. You DO understand that Tripwire actually consulted professionals on the weapons statistics just for this game right? When has cod done that? When IW adds ballistics ill pay $60
