REFEREE VS SPECTATOR FEUD AFTER TWO PENALTIES IN 30 SECONDS!!! 

I stopped refereeing a long time ago because I got tired of arguing the rules with people who don't know the rules.

Easy to make a judgment when you can rewatch an incident in slow motion vs when you get one quick look

The PK (while originally may not have been awarded given that from the only angle we were given looked like it was in a natural position) would have been retaken if the ref & AR called it correctly before the clear foul that lead to another PK. The keeper moves off the line with both feet before the kick is taken and encroachment from the players into the box before the PK is taken.

First one was harsh BUT should have been retaken because of encroachment. The ref should of at least back his assistant up and sent the parent away or ordered him from the field of play

The second that the guy walks out there and starts running his mouth at the ref, he should be booted. That's completely unacceptable.

I don't know about that old guy, but for my real estate needs I'm calling Tom!

Referee was correct , he missed the encroachment of the two players in blue team also

I'm a referee as well and they were both good calls. The defending players arm made his body naturally bigger and there was a blatant touch on the 2nd foul.

Yea the first one is a tough call, ya it hits the elbow but the arm is tight to the body, probably a no call n my opinion. And agree that it should have been retaken with the Croatia players entering too early. 2nd one is a clear peno tho, guy gets taken out from behind, good call.

Encroachment on the first penalty. Should’ve been a retake.

That referee handled himself really well. And I have no problem with either call. They were both really close though I thought that the second one was a clear foul. My guess is the arguing fan is just a local drunk that all of them know. He didn't exactly get a lot of support from the players.

It's funny, because they where complaining about getting another kick when no matter what there should have been a re-kick because not just one but TWO players #21 #86 entered the box before the kick was taken. So no matter what when the ball was saved it should have been retaken.

The biggest problem in this video is parents thinking they know what they’re talking about and the constant yelling, coaching, etc. from the parents. For all my teams I train, I tell the parents right away if they say anything besides great job, nice goal, etc. I’m telling them to leave. Even if they aren’t going nuts and just “coaching” from the side, they aren’t the coach. These parents are awful today

No chance is the first one a pen. But when it’s taken and not scored it should be retaken, 21 is practically at the penalty spot before the shot is taken. Oh and the second offence is 100% a pen.

1st one no penalty, but 2nd one is a good call.

That encroachment on the first pen was so bad I would of have ordered it to be retaken anyway

Totally agree so did I

I was on a Board for Soccer in our Town. We started a ban on parents criticizing referees. The first week this started one of the other board members was criticizing a 17 year old girl referee. That was the end for me.

I wished you couldve showed the replays to that spectator to shut him up

It should have been a retake on PK 1 because of Encroachment by No. 21 @0:31

Great save on that first PK - the handball was not intentional, rather incidental contact

Good 1st call, older players get very good at disguising handling the ball. Go frame by frame and watch him open his palm, and bend at the knees so as to deliberately put his hand in the way of the shot...very sneaky. Was the "F" bomb actually directed at the referee with no reprercussions??

The ref is always right. That's how football works.

I agreed with both of the calls.

2 CLEAR PENALTY KICKS !

As a referee, I'm embarrassed by seeing the first penalty call. The rule states: "A handball occurs if any player, other than the team’s goalkeeper within his own penalty area, deliberately handles the ball when in play." The player had his arms by his side, had the ball drilled at him and did not move his arms/hands to intercept the ball. It's a clear case of "ball to hand", and should never have been a penalty. I had to watch a replay, just to try and figure out what the penalty was given for - as I couldn't figure it out, on first watching! First penalty - defender #21 comes into the penalty area before the ball has been struck. I warn all players, before a penalty is taken, that it will be retaken automatically under two conditions 1. Defender enters early, and goal is not scored 2. Attacker enters early, and goal is scored. It's right in front of the referee, he can't fail to see this happen - should have been a retaken penalty after the save. Second penalty claim. No complaints here, defender cannot get to the ball and makes a clumsy tackle. No need for any cards, but it's a definite penalty.

In My opinion, the first one is not a penalty, hands in the right place, no way he couldent "hide" better is hands, the 2nd for me is a right call, he fell over the striker, good call also by The aar

❤❤

Yeah at first I thought the 2nd one was a bad call, but after watching it 17,000 times in slow-mo, I have to admit: It was a surprisingly GOOD call. (Lucky? LOL) Usually soccer refs just BLOW THE WHISTLE every time someone falls down.

Second PK is a no-brainer, clear offense in the PA.

1st was never a pen but the 2nd on replay is the clearest penalty I've seen in my life. He literally gets their 1st gets his body in front of the defender and the barrels through him lol.

On the first PK, did the goalie move too quickly'? Also, 2 blue players moved in too soon, which would mean the PK needs to be retaken.

First pen should be retaken for encroachment second one is borderline encroachment

1st one very tough call, 2nd one is a good PK. But the original PK should have been retaken due to defender encroachment. Referee needs to be quick when calling the 2nd pk, as you can tell game control is about to be lost.

Where else?! Toronto!!!

Kozina Enterprise getting some free air time!

Amazingly slow reflexes by the keeper on that second goal. Looked he expected the chip and had his weight back. What a buffoon :)

Both are pens at this level and without ANY sort of replay technology. I don’t see the issue here

I love how #7 in white scores that second goal and give the jackwad in the blue cap a "that one's for you." And THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is how you deal with hecklers. Unless you're LeChina James, of course. Then you run to the referee and cry, "That person is saying MEAN things to me," and getting them run out of the building.

Tough call. To me looks like the defender reacted to the ball and it hit his hand. PK. However it should have been a rekick anyway as the blue players were in the penalty area prior to the kick.

2:28 even fkn Nico from GTA 5 is spectating the match

I don't much like either call; but honestly both of these would have been called in EPL and FIFA.

Both proper calls and they know it.

It's a shame people have to disrespect the officials to make themselves feel good about a call

And everyone wonders why officials don't want to work games when they're constantly questioned about every single call they make. Not worth it.

As a ref myself, no one thinks you are cool when you fight the ref. Piss off and let us do our job. We get paid wether the game happens or not. We WILL call it off.

1st one no foul, arm was down by his side in a natural position. 2nd one definitely a foul, how can anyone argue with it? Offensive player got to the ball first and was run into by the defender. The fact that there can be 2 pk’s back to back just blows people’s minds. It’s like when parent’s say ‘All the calls are going against us’ Well did it ever occur to you that maybe your son’s team is doing all the fouling?

On the initial PK the blue players were in the box before he even kicked it, so replay the initial PK!

Second one was clear first one could’ve been ball to hand or handball it’s reAlly 50/5

spectacle aside, thats a good camera

First one definitely wasn't a penalty but difficult to tell with such a wicked deviation Second one definitely was a penalty (and incredibly naive defending too)

2nd one is a nailed on pen

Should've been a retake of the pen anyway. Two defenders clearly entered the box before the ball was kicked.

Tough call there. If that 2nd penalty kick wasn't called, then should've been re-taken for encroaching

One thing leaves no doubt... White really blow at taking PKs

1st penalty should have been retaken as 2 defenders ran into the area prior to the attacker kicking the ball.

I thought they called encroachment

First one wasn’t a penalty. Second one was more of a penalty than the first, by far.

It baffles me to read that some people think the first one is a penalty. It is ball to hand and never ever a penalty, even if the defender was on the goal line and the ball to hand prevented a goal.

Those goals aren’t regulation size

Both of those calls were correct, 2 PKs awarded

People like that are why sports leagues everywhere are having a hard time recruiting and retaining referees. Grown men screaming at kids, over a game.

Ignoring the debate on whether it was a handball (as the balance between how far away was the kick and how far from the body was the arm is quite delicate), the first penalty should have been retaken, as the goalie was off the line early.

Both good calls, and I hate referees.

Keeper moved the second time too, which would have invited more drama....

First one was indeed a handball ref didn't call it fans got upset. That right there refs you got to stay alert and pay close attention otherwise you'll get nasty words from spectators.

As a Brit i can tell you the first definitely wasn't a penalty but the second one was 😂😂🇬🇧✌

I can’t figure out the blue team PK strategy. In both kicks Blue attackers went with the kicker into the area before the ball was kicked. Almost like an American football kickoff.

Regardless of what you think about the veracity of the foul decisions, the referee should have easily been through Ask, Tell, Dismiss in the duration of that confrontation. The gentleman who was confronting should NOT have been permitted to stay on the field of play after approaching and directly intimidating a match official.

Keeper looked off his line before the ball was struck the first time anyway......probably should've been a retake

I think that was the Croatian Mob. If anybody shows up missing..........

❤❤MILO

the first mistake was when the referee allowed the spectator to approach him. Just walk away and inform coaches the game will restart when the spectator is told to leave the field. The second mistake is that the guy was smoking, probably won't be around for the next season.

That guy would have been gone in 5 seconds if I was the ref. Plus, he's smoking. Another ejection.

At games I've seen threw the years spectators talking to refs Would last ten seconds before they had to leave the field.

Smoking is allowed on the soccer field?

These players look pretty old to be having a parent argue with the ref on the field.🤣😆🤣😆🤣😆🤣

The First call was a harsh one his hands where in a natural position saying that he awarded the pen and when missed it should of been retaken as clearly there is Defending Team players in the Area prior to the kick been taken

First one should have been retaken anyway for encroachment.

1st, no penalty; the goalie came off his line anyway...re-kick the PK. 2nd was questionable...if anything, the ball should go the other way...free kick to blue.

Both calls are correct

First one shouldn't have been a hand ball. Ball kicked into his hand , he didn't try to stop the ball with his hand. Second on a clear foul. He never made contact with the ball and ran through the player in front of him. To all the sideline judges , try reffing this at full speed with Ahole parents on the sideline yelling at you.

1st call no pen but the 2 call clear pen

Ajmo Hrvatska!

Both clear penalties. Plus should’ve been a retake. Pause at 0:31

what kind of weird game are they playing?

Referee was spot on with both penalty decisions, as for the old guy in the blue cap he needs to learn to keep his mouth shut....

Remember guys, for all your real estate needs, call Tom today.

First one is a handball because it stops the progression of an attack. According to the fifa laws, it is a handball regardless of intention

Stop the game, dismiss the "fan," restart it only when he is out the area, sight and sound.

First penalty should’ve been retaken anyway

I think he missed the first one and got #2 right

Anyone want to explain what happened in the first few seconds?

Referee should pay attention to the massive encroachment by the defenders right in front of his face on the 1st kick, and have it re-taken. Of course, maybe shouldn't have called the 1st penalty at all...

Should be a redo of the first PK since the blue team encroached A TON lmao

I didn't know that Bradley Cooper played soccer

First one was iffy but the second one was clear

How many cigarettes did that spectator smoke while this video was being made?

The first one wasn't a penalty his hang was by his side and the second one was definitely apparently you can't tackle from behind

3:22 it's free real estate ;)