Religion, economics and extremism | Q+A Highlights | ABC News

Подписаться 1,7 млн

Просмотров 10 тыс.

50% 1

The Q+A panel discuss global economic insecurity, Australia's cost of living crisis, and racism in sport and politics.
Subscribe: ab.co/3yqPOZ5
Panellists: Jonathan Sumption, Former Justice of the UK Supreme Court and author; Amanda Rishworth, Minister for Social Services; Mehreen Faruqi, Australian Greens Deputy Leader; Francis Awaritefe, Chair, Professional Footballers Australia; and Alan Oster, Group Chief Economist, National Australia Bank.
This episode was broadcast on Thursday October 6, 2022.
00:00 Introduction
00:50 Religion and Employment - Andrew Thorburn
10:17 Mehreen Faruqi, Pauline Hanson, and racist tweets
16:50 Cost of Living and Stage 3 Tax Cuts
26:32 Risk of World War III
ABC News In-depth takes you deeper on the big stories, with long-form journalism from Four Corners, Foreign Correspondent, Australian Story, Planet America and more, and explainers from ABC News Video Lab.
Watch more ABC News content ad-free on ABC iview: ab.co/2OB7Mk1
For more from ABC News, click here: ab.co/2kxYCZY
Get breaking news and livestreams from our ABC News channel: / newsonabc
Like ABC News on Facebook: / abcnews.au
Follow ABC News on Instagram: / abcnews_au
Follow ABC News on Twitter: / abcnews
Note: In most cases, our captions are auto-generated.
#ABCNewsIndepth #ABCNewsAustralia

Опубликовано:

3 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 75

@LK-vv2xk Год назад

Sumption, as always, is the cleverest person in the room.

@ic3yboy Год назад

4:32 hatred and bigotry

@takemasu45 Год назад

I'm trying so hard to figure out why she's scowling. Does she disagree with him? She looks like the type who'd be fully behind what he's saying

@ManForToday 11 месяцев назад

She was expecting him to have the opposite opinion of her. Hilarious that he finished his sentence with what is effectively the liberal position.

@FueledbyJohn Год назад

Interesting commentary. 🙂👍

@MrBibi86 Год назад

*Wasn't Jesus against greed? this fella was the head of a bank. the irony!*

@danielrussell6079 Год назад

Just because he just is a leader of a bank doesn't mean he is greedy

@MrBibi86 Год назад

@@danielrussell6079 lol

@MrBibi86 Год назад

getting a 7 figure income plus bonuses a year whilst the company you run rips people off and kicks people out of their homes isn't greedy? I think it's greedy and morally wrong! especially when you are throwing stones at minority groups

@gustaaf1892 Год назад

Some of the modern churches encourage wealth accumulation, but in general wealth is unrelated to religion.

@LS-xs7sg 3 месяца назад

4:31 and these people call us the “hateful” ones lol. She is seething at the idea a man she disagrees with had a job.

@grandmothergoose Год назад

Religious schools and institutions want to be able to hire and fire people based on their religious beliefs, but as soon as anyone else wants to do the same, they scream discrimination. It has to be one rule for all. It's not religion nor homosexuality or anti-anything that's tearing society apart, it's hypocrisy and one rule for me and one rule for you attitudes that's doing all the damage.

@bernie4268 Год назад

For all its virtue signalling over tolerance, there is still not one openly gay footballer in the AFL. Will there ever be? And in defence of Christians here- in particular Catholic schools here - I worked alongside many staff in defacto relationships and gay staff in Catholic schools. Their lives and partners were welcome at staff functions. So they are being very tolerant of diversity.

@michaelandrews4783 Год назад

The whole point of religion is to divide, to claim one religion is true (subscribing to it) and by default all others are not with no actual evidence is a bizarre way to behave, but that's not my problem it's Catholics and those who insist their religion is the true one.

@crookedclassic Год назад

Amanda Rishworth is embarrassingly poor at piecing words together that mean anything. Maybe she just isn't a very good public speaker but it sounds like she has no idea what she's talking about, and repeatedly presents an exaggerated fake kindness with obvious attempts at empathy. She brought nothing to the panel and perhaps even made a bit of a fool out of herself.

@MrBibi86 Год назад

*Would his church hire a gay person in a leadership role?*

@gustaaf1892 Год назад

Churches are exempt from legal discrimination charges.

@danielrussell6079 Год назад

No sorry

@MrBibi86 Год назад

@@danielrussell6079 he should accept the same treatment.

@danielrussell6079 Год назад

@@MrBibi86 why you can't fire someone for being gay and you can't fire someone for their religious beliefs. You guys assume he hates gays because of the church he attends last time I checked that man is an individual. The God of the bible is against same set relationships because it goes against his design for humankind. And the God of the bible is against abortion as well because according to the bible life starts in the womb not after. (Leviticus 18:22/Luke 1:44 God bless you and turn your heart to Jesus Christ and believe in his death on the cross for the forgiveness of your sins and his resurrection from the dead

@mikerobinson2008 Год назад

personal beliefs are always relevant. if I thought it was alright to punch anyone that annoyed me would you employ me?

@bidzam Год назад

That is not a belief but that is assault. Your example in itself is off the mark.

@mikerobinson2008 Год назад

@@bidzam you missed the point completely whilst actually agreeing with it.

@RogerJJSmith Год назад

@@mikerobinson2008 You're not the sharpest tool in the box, are you Mike?

@mikerobinson2008 Год назад

@@RogerJJSmith says the guy responding to a 3 month old thread.

@gustaaf1892 Год назад

Does this woman want to abolish parliamentary privilege? That is a fundamental part of our political system. Politics is tough and you can't take everything political opponents say to heart and personal.

@qicomittee8501 Год назад

Quality of this show has significantly decreased with illogical and quite left leaning panelists. Very biased show.

@michaelandrews4783 Год назад

Move to the USA and enjoy a right wing hell hole. Democrats are not left wing by world standards, they are conservatives.

@goodyear05 Год назад

only 58 comments 😝 the wiggles gets more comments and views then this crap show

@mikerobinson2008 Год назад

"faith" the cover for bigots.

@Frohicky1 10 месяцев назад

Yes. And bigotry, a cover for lack of faith.

@johndwyer818 Год назад

Does being anti-homosexual relationships qualify as "homophobic" ? What right does one segment of the community have to dictate to another segment what they can and cannot believe ?

@MrBibi86 Год назад

don't know. I'm anti religion

@tmuxor Год назад

@@MrBibi86 nobody asked you

@koalitaDormilona Год назад

is there a word for phobia of being labelled homophobic

@kristinehayes4885 Год назад

@@MrBibi86 yeah religions and their gods need to go the way of the Dodo.

@zennydoo Год назад

Ok snowflake ❄️

@avishekmondal2982 Год назад

Why this lady not wear her hijab if it's so important in islam... In India mullah said that hijab is compulsory in islam🤣🤣i just don't understand are the Iranian women are against islam🤣🤣

@forallofme4441 Год назад

4:32 The face of ABC's bias. Very "subtle" of you ABC - why not add a booing track and a laugh track next?

@organicod2438 Год назад

Isn't showing one person's disagreement to another person's statement more indicative of there being two sides to the argument. I mean, there was imagery and audio of people applauding points too. If anything, this is simply imagery of one person's opinion on a topic. It sort of signalled to me that the majority of the crowd was supporting the point being made. Different story if there were a number of people scowling about pro-choice opinions.

@forallofme4441 Год назад

@@organicod2438 It could be if it were evenly applied. There wasn't any negative reaction shown when the lady before was making her point and I've noticed the pattern when it's points that the ABC tends to agree with that have supporting shots. That feels like bias to me.

@organicod2438 Год назад

@@forallofme4441 one easy solution for you to not be annoyed by it would be to only listen to the show. But I take your point. It is sadly not possible to have unbiased media. The human element, and the drive for ratings via outrage etc. is impossible to remove, I think

@forallofme4441 Год назад

@@organicod2438 I've actually stopped watching Q+A for a while now. Just checked out this episode cause the title was interesting. Not watching it has been a really good solution for me. Now all I'd want is to stop funding the ABC altogether.

@organicod2438 Год назад

@@forallofme4441 Haha fair enough. I barely watched it either since I left Australia, but every now and again the clickbait finds me

@farright118 Год назад

Australia isn't Australia any more. Let's not pretend this is Australia

@danwhythough Год назад

Nobody told me. When did that happen?! Where the bloody hell are we?

@gustaaf1892 Год назад

Are you going to spam your racist nonsense? As I've already said, unfortunately for you your power is restricted to just one vote at the ballot box, so you basically get no say. That must eat you up knowing how powerless you are in spite of your tough racist talk.

@channelname1019 Год назад

What is Australia, fashboy?

@farright118 Год назад

@@channelname1019 it is a different nation with the name Australia slapped on. While your comment is funny I am factually correct

@channelname1019 Год назад

@@farright118 "Factually correct"? No, you are fatuously incorrect. You're nostalgic for an age that never existed and are projecting your own fascistic inclinations onto a skewed version of history. Australia has a shameful colonial history that should never be forgotten or ignored, but to pretend that Australian culture (outside of state propaganda) has ever been the jingoistic flag-waving white mono-culture that your imported US American style pseudo-patriotism (ie ethno-nationalism in disguise) tries to promulgate is an act of dense ignorance, knowing dishonesty or a combination of the two. In short, you're full of shit.

@farright118 Год назад

13:30 Australia was founded by Europeans for Europeans. Just because you have a piece of paper doesn't make you Australian. That's not to say allied people can't be Australian ie. Koreans Japanese etc

@qarey Год назад

Say it loud say it proud. Australia WAS founded by Europeans for Europeans. But it's time we erased that Eurocentrism from this great country.

@farright118 Год назад

@@qarey then it's not Australia anymore thus giving me the democratic right to rise and and proclaim a new nation by the name of Australia whist re issuing citizenship and expelling the rest

@markwalshopoulos Год назад

Imagine pretending that you're an Australian nationalist while saying that it's European

@gustaaf1892 Год назад

Ok you racist. Unfortunately the power you have is restricted to just one vote at the ballot box, so you basically get no say. That must eat you up knowing how powerless you are in spite of your tough talk.

@seanocd Год назад

If you wanna start getting picky: Australia was invaded and taken by Brits for Brittan. You wanna talk national heritage? Better be First Nations. They're the only people who can claim any right to this land.