Тёмный

Religious Freedom, Minorities Rights & Apostasy in Islam 

ByChoiceMuslim
Подписаться 20 тыс.
Просмотров 27 тыс.
50% 1

Symposium on Religious Freedom and the Rights Of Minorities (Panel 1: Ft. Dr. Shaykh Abdallah Bin Bayyah, Dr Jamal Badawi & Dr. Jonathan Brown) Modeator: Imam Mohamed Magid
Cosponsored with The Islamic Society of North America. Scholars and academics of Islam discussed the historical legacy of religious minorities in Muslim-majority societies, and how concepts of pluralism and minority rights can be examined in a contemporary context, particularly following the dramatic developments of the Arab Spring. This symposium provided an opportunity for academics, government officials, diplomats, and other experts based in Washington, DC to engage in these discussions.
Dr. Shaykh Abdallah Bin Bayyah: Pluralism & Religious Minorities in Islam: The Historical Legacy
Jamal Badawi: Early Islamic Theology on Religious Minorities and Pluralism
Jonathan Brown: Ideals and Realities for Better or for Worse in the History of Religious Minorities in Islamic Civilization
Original: vimeo.com/55551089
Panel 2: vimeo.com/55554853
Tags: Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam, Apostasy in Islam, Apostasy in Islam, Apostasy in Islam, Apostasy in Islam, Apostasy in Islam, Apostasy in Islam, Apostasy in Islam, Apostasy in Islam, Apostasy in Islam,
Sharia Law, Sharia Law, Sharia Law, Sharia Law, Sharia Law, Sharia Law, Sharia Law, Sharia Law, Sharia Law, Sharia Law,
Islamic Law, Islamic Law, Islamic Law, Islamic Law, Islamic Law, Islamic Law, Islamic Law, Islamic Law, Islamic Law, Islamic Law,

Опубликовано:

 

10 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 60   
@FaheemSohail
@FaheemSohail 7 лет назад
Interesting to see Dr Brown translating for Shaykh Bin Bayyah in place of his usual translator Sh. Hamza Yusuf :)
@Munzer1977
@Munzer1977 2 года назад
As a native Arab am amazed of the accuracy of Dr. Jonathan's translation.
@monjiaitaly
@monjiaitaly 10 лет назад
I think the fear of sharia law is that it falls on the human to dictate and can be so easily as any law can become corrupt. The little I know about sharia law is that it is fair but again can become corrupt and that is scary.
@monjiaitaly
@monjiaitaly 9 лет назад
***** but people can be bribed. Look at the stoning law four witnesses have to actually see the pen go in the ink jar. How is that possible, but still people are being stoned.
@user-ky7rd2it2r
@user-ky7rd2it2r 8 лет назад
+monjiaitaly There wouldn't be corruption because muslims are commanded to forbid evil. But to have an islamic sharia law we first need muslims.
@monjiaitaly
@monjiaitaly 8 лет назад
YES SIR Epic lols good muslims.
@mbeletoeo2803
@mbeletoeo2803 6 лет назад
monjiaitaly you are so right with this.. unfortunately.. people use the religion for their profit .. look at Iran, where high officials can rape, but if the woman who's about to get raped by this high official defends herself and kills the offender before he finished, she's gonna get hanged for "murder".. laughing stock justice system nowadays.. I am Muslim and I love Islam and sharia in theory is for me justice, but in practice.. Oh boi.. that's why I support secularism.. not because I think it's better than Islamic ahkam in itself but Muslims lost their respect and their fear of God.. you will find so many men who will lie and say they saw this and that woman doing zina just to get her killed although she didn't do it or maybe even was raped.. I sometimes really hate my Muslims folks.. 😡
@ToKyoBraZilBoriCua77
@ToKyoBraZilBoriCua77 9 лет назад
Shukran jazeelan :)
@HussainFahmy
@HussainFahmy 9 лет назад
The 'Shariah' is not what the Muslims practice, rather the practice of 'Shariah' in accordance to the Noble Quran and the authentic 'Sunnah'
@Gog3453
@Gog3453 7 лет назад
Hussain Fahmy حسين فحمي the shariah is extracted from Quran and sunnah (ijma)
@Fareeh.
@Fareeh. 3 года назад
@@Gog3453 can you explain what is the reason apostates are killed in short words? It is disturbing my imaan for some period. Pls reply.
@Gog3453
@Gog3453 3 года назад
@@Fareeh. the Quran doesn’t support the killing of apostates
@Fareeh.
@Fareeh. 3 года назад
@@Gog3453 yeah I know Quran doesn't mention but numerous hadith mention it. What is the explanation of this hadith.
@Gog3453
@Gog3453 3 года назад
@@Fareeh. then know that the Hadith is flawed
@mustno3
@mustno3 10 лет назад
"Alwaleed Bin Talal center" !!!!! Ar you kidding me? ... are you freaking kidding me ... ? Do you know who Al Walid Bin Talal is and the amount of filth that surrounds his name. Al Walid Bin Talal is the owner of MOST if not all entertainment TV networks in the middle east ... and when I say entertainment ... you should picture the kind of entertainment one finds in hip hop music videos with all the semi-naked girls and stuff ... that's what you will see on his "Rotana network" ... and not only music videos ... but movies and all sorts of filth shows Al Walid Bin Talal is the farthest Saudi prince from islam ... the guy is a known fornicator ... women are suing him in france and spain for rape ... and now he has an institute in the US for islam ... WHAAAAAT at first I was interested in the video ... but then when I saw the name in the back ... I was shocked ... Dude this guy and this institute and these conferences have only one goal apparently ... and that is to infiltrate islam and muslims' minds and distort our religion ... good can not come from filth and filthy people ...
@samiware1704
@samiware1704 9 лет назад
mustno3 I agree with most of what u said Sir, but God the Almighty has his own wisdom, our prophet says (Allah The Almighty supports this Deen by people who has nothing in the hereafter. And in another narrative (..... By a Mushrik man) So please calm down and take the gist of the Symposium. All those four people in the panel are truthful in their intentions.
@mustno3
@mustno3 9 лет назад
unitedware direware In that case the hadith you've mentioned can also be taken as an excuse to have Geert Wilders organize these kinds of Symposia. So why not have the same panel invited by e.g. Pamela Geller. Walid Ibn Talal is no different than those two people, so why the double standard? So NO. Walid ibn Talal is even more dangerous on islam than the aforementioned islamophobes; and those people in the panel should've known better before accepting his invitation.
@samiware1704
@samiware1704 9 лет назад
Again I agree with you that Waleed Bin Talal is more dangerous than disbelievers because he is a hypocrite ...but what i am saying is that we have reached an open era... so let the intellectual machine does its work God said (say /oh Muhammad/ the truth from your lord, and who is willing to believe then let him believe and who is will to disbelieve then let him disbelieve)
@eatle7604
@eatle7604 7 лет назад
mustno3 Doesnt matter who invited, if this talk gives benefit then I'll hear
@mustno3
@mustno3 7 лет назад
Raga B M you're an idiot
@hasancoool
@hasancoool 10 лет назад
The Jihad declared by Abu Bakr RA against the apostates and the eventual agreement to it by the Sahabah RAA clearly proves that those persons who received religious instruction directly from the Prophet were united in deciding that an Islamic government should wage war against any group that renounces Islam. Some people argue that this event was a jihad because they consider the apostates to have been rebels who had ceased paying the government tax (zakat), dismissed the government officials and began to establish their own governments. But this argument is definitely wrong on four accounts: 1. Not all the people against whom the jihad was conducted withheld zakat. In fact they included various types of apostates. Some Arabs believed in individuals who had laid claim to prophethood and proclaimed their message in various corners of Arabia. Others renounced their faith in the prophethood of Muhammad (Sallallahu Alaihi wasallam) saying that if Muhammad had been a prophet, he would not have died. Some people acknowledged all the requirements of religion and were ready to pay even zakat. But, they added, they themselves would collect and spend their zakat and would not give it to the officials of Abu Bakr. 2. For all these various kinds of people the Companions of the Prophet used the word "apostate" (murtadd) instead of "rebel" and the word "apostasy" (irtidad) instead of "rebellion" when referring to that disturbance. From this it is clearly evident that in their view the real crime that the people had committed was apostasy and not rebellion. At the time when Abu Bakr sent Ikrimah ibn Abi Jahl to wage a jihad against the people in South Arabia who had confessed the prophethood of Laqit ibn Malik al-Azdi, he advised him: Wherever you find apostates from Oman to Hadramaut and Yemen, crush them. 3. When doubt was expressed regarding the permissibility or otherwise of waging a war against those who refused to pay zakat, Abu Bakr replied: By God! I will wage war against anyone who differentiates between prayer and zakat. This clearly means that in the view of the first caliph their real crime was not the withholding of zakat but the acceptance of one pillar (of Islam) and the rejection of another. Finally the companions agreed with the caliph to wage jihad against those refusing to pay zakat only because they were completely satisfied with the incumbent caliph's arguments that the opponents had renounced the true religion by drawing a distinction between prayer and zakat. 4. More decisive than all of the above is Abu Bakr's proclamation which he had issued in writing to each of the commanders of the eleven armies at the time he sent the armies to the various parts of Arabia to wage jihad against the apostates. The following sentences especially merit consideration: "I have come to know about the movement of those among you who have accepted following Satan and who, having no fear of God, have turned from Islam to kufr. Now I have sent you someone with an army of believers and have advised him to accept nothing from anyone except faith and to execute no one without first inviting him to God, the Mighty and Glorious One. Then whoever accepts his invitation to God and, after confession, maintains good conduct, he will accept his confession and assist him in walking in the right path. And he will fight whoever refuses until he returns to the commandment of God." (Al-Bidayah w'al-Nahayah (Vol. 6, p. 316). "
@dashroom4036
@dashroom4036 10 лет назад
Excellent, mostly correct. Most people do use zakat as the primary reason Abu Bakr RA waged war, but yes, it was more than that, it was a defiance to the central Muslim government authority, taken shape in different forms, most famously the withholding of zakaat and laying claims of false prophets to meet their own ends, mirroring the likes of Musaylama al-kazzab whose primary goal was his own rise to power over the Quraysh. 1. Therefore, we see the common reason, a rebellion against the central Muslim government, in different ways. 2. Indeed, when we read the books of Fiqh, the order usually goes Kitab us Siyar (Institutions, military campaigns against external non-muslims), then Murdad (apostates/non-muslim internal rebels), then Bugat (internal Muslim rebels). Therefore, a murtad was always understood and treated in the military/rebellious context. 3. Again, correct, the real crime was undermining and rebelling against the central Muslim government, with zakaat as it's most famous form. 4. Yes, same principle, rebellion, chaos and undermining of the central government. They were given the chance to stop their rebellion ( "Now I have sent you someone with an army of believers and have advised him to accept nothing from anyone except faith and to execute no one without first inviting him to God, the Mighty and Glorious One. Then whoever accepts his invitation to God and, after confession, maintains good conduct, he will accept his confession and assist him in walking in the right path"), and told of the consequence of those who would not stop ("And he will fight whoever refuses until he returns to the commandment of God.") I'm glad someone understand the full picture of the issue. Also, I don't know if it was intentional or not, but you have pointed out a great usool in fiqh, that is the extent and establishment of the Ijmaa of Sahaba. Little do people know how this issue is not based explicit in the Kitaab (Qur'aan) or the established Sunna. In this case it is Ijmaa Ma'qool (a consensus of the Sahaba that is based in logic/rational/policy (or 'illah)). And, as the Uslouluyoon like Imam Karkhi say, that Ijmaa which is Ma'qool is not binding in sharia.
@Gog3453
@Gog3453 7 лет назад
Mehfooz Husein you can believe what you want to believe in a Islamic state but you will comply to the rule of law
@hakimseddiq8414
@hakimseddiq8414 6 лет назад
Mehfooz Husein wasnt it against Musaylama the liar Who claimed to be a prophète and its mischiefs that made Abu BAKR radia'ALLAHOU 3AN declare Jihad against him!???
@riyastrazack
@riyastrazack 3 года назад
How a political action necessitated the situation could be model for all time ?
@Fareeh.
@Fareeh. 3 года назад
@@dashroom4036 can you explain what is the reason apostates are killed in short words? It is disturbing my imaan for some period. Pls reply.
Далее
Securing Open Societies - with Sh Abdallah bin Bayyah
58:03
Slavery in Islam - Dr. Jonathan AC Brown | Lecture
1:09:53
A Conversation With Shaykh Abdallah bin Bayyah
1:16:40
Просмотров 77 тыс.
Reclaiming Our Faith: Lecture 5 by Jonathan Brown
30:55