Remote ID for Drones Delayed PLUS RID Tips and Tricks

Подписаться 39 тыс.

Просмотров 13 тыс.

50% 1

Remote ID Delayed for Drone Operators, PLUS Remote ID Questions/answers and a GiveAway!
🎬 First RID delay Interview with FAA Vid: • Remote ID for Drones U...
🎬 FAA Interview about RID Vid: • REMOTE ID Rule for Dro...
🎬 RID MODULE Vid: • Cheap Remote ID Module...
🎬 Pilot Institute 107 Vid: • Should you get your FA...
🎈🎈🎈 And the WINNERS ARE..... 🎈🎈🎈
Arizona Wyldwest
HighlanderMikeGolf
3halseys
Derek Phelps
Congrats! Send your shipping info as shown in the video and drop a comment if you like! 🎈🎈
**** You have until 9/26/2023 to reply! ******
🏅 Pilot Institute 107 course: bit.ly/3rwJrxV (or enter ALIENDRONES in the coupon section) you can get $100 off, they guarantee you pass or money back.
👕 The now INFAMOUS Alien Drones FAA SHIRT SERIES here: alien-drones.m...
☕ Enjoy the content? Buy Me a Coffee! www.buymeacoff...
‪@PilotInstitute‬
== My Equipment ==
DRONES:
DJI Mini 2 se: amzn.to/43eotpS
ATOM SE: amzn.to/3S26HRK
Skydio 2+: skydio.pxf.io/...
DJI Mini 3 Pro: amzn.to/3WnWmRZ
EXO Blackhawk 2 - Mini Pro: bit.ly/3BgyYg7
Ruko F11 GIM2: amzn.to/36XBRX7
EXO X7 Ranger Plus: bit.ly/3BgyYg7
EXO Cinemaster2: bit.ly/3BgyYg7
DJI Mavic Air 2s: amzn.to/3wlGUbI
-DJI Mavic Mini2: amzn.to/3gtK0ng
MISC. STUFF
💨TopTes Anemometer: amzn.to/3YQVxl5
DroneTag Mini: bit.ly/3z3wNvh
Lume Cube Strobe: amzn.to/2FmZHxt (EBAY): ebay.us/SVV6z3
64G Extreme SD Card: (Amazon) amzn.to/2JNk3Bi
Drone Foldable Landing Pad: (Amazon) amzn.to/3mbaa4t
CONTROLLER PARTS: - Magnetic Charging Cable: (Amazon) amzn.to/3IEYdKW
Remote Rt Angle Cable (Type C): amzn.to/2XNhJAj
Remote Rt Angle Combo Pack (Type C, tablet and phone): amzn.to/37LpFWa
Remote Rt Angle Cable (Lightning): amzn.to/2RTjYOy
Remote Rt Angle Cable (Micro): amzn.to/33ye9cx
--TABLET Rt Angle cable (Type C): (Amazon) amzn.to/2oJ7Hkp
--- TABLET Rt Angle cable (Micro): amzn.to/2XVGHLY
-- Skyreat Tablet Holder (Metal NUT): (Amazon) amzn.to/3Y4PbO0
CAMERAS AND BLOGGING EQUIPMENT:
Sony A6400: (Amazon) amzn.to/2EIt7mC
Camera Tripod (Amazon) amzn.to/2rCQdr8
Extension Tubes for Macro Photography (Amazon): amzn.to/2FRtRcN
🎤 DJI Mic: amzn.to/3BQItDo
🎤 Coiled TRS Mic Patch Cable (red): amzn.to/3IWKlOD
🎤 Coiled Saramonic TRS Patch Cable: amzn.to/3G8VxGB
🎤 Saramonic Lav (Black): amzn.to/3jgarBU
🎤 Saramonic Lav (White): amzn.to/3FEs7yC
POST PROCESSING SOFTWARE:
Luminar Neo: skylum.evyy.ne...
DISCOUNT CODE for $10 OFF Luminar: "aliendrones"
Hey, Like the music? Audiio has a pay-once, lifetime plan, no subscription!: Audiio Link here: audiio.com/pri... and Use “AlienDrones10” for 10% OFF! or "SAVE100" for $100 OFF a subscription!
Music from Audiio
Any material included herein for illustration or example creates new value and complies with industry fair use best practices. Your support is appreciated as a small stipend may be received from associate links which costs you nothing, but helps support this channel and foster future content! Thank you again for visiting Alien Drones!

Опубликовано:

5 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 263

@AlienDrones Год назад

Winner Winner Chicken Dinner! 🎈🎈 Check the description! 👀

@nightwaves3203 Год назад

The delay could be waiting for the US Fish and Wildlife Service to reply on when they can tag all birds 250 grams and up with remote ID. Duck hunters are going to love it.

@AlienDrones Год назад

Wait, if a duck is fitted with remote ID then does it become an aircraft, and if so, wouldn't shooting down an aircraft be frowned upon by the FAA? 😂

@nightwaves3203 Год назад

@@AlienDrones A simple sub section to exclude birds with RID with a further sub section for endangered species and eagles. making them non huntable. Maybe eagles should have ADSB hehehe.

@frankmoreau8847 Год назад

What is really the unfortunate outcome of this remote ID nonsense is how it hurts RC modeler community. If they have a scale replica of a P-51, they have to find a way to attach the module to the outside the plane (hideous) or mount it inside if there is room, as there is virtually no legal place for them to fly otherwise. In my state there are four FRIAs all four are a minimum three hour drive from me. They are really only convenient to either Seattle or Spokane. Some western states don't have any FRIAs at all. So far, the FAA has approved 234 sites, less than five per state. If this were just to regulate drones then RC modelers would not have been included, this is to clear the skies for Amazon and other for profit enterprises. Thank you Congress!!!

@iwontreplybacklol7481 Год назад

When it comes to politicians, follow the money...

@TheDroneAngle Год назад

Since I pulled out all the stops and spent $350 complying by their deadline, I should get something special from the FAA, like an extra 100 feet or so...lol

@SlackerU Год назад

That'd be nice, give me 500ft over my private-property in uncontrolled-airspace.

@AlienDrones Год назад

Seems fair to me... 👽

@WW5RM Год назад

Vertically, horizontally or both?

@rafaelontiveros7450 Год назад

"Relief" means, this is unnecessary pressure on the consumer. RID, can be delayed infinitely, enforced soon. Thank you, for the update.

@amen_ra6926 Год назад

Question #3 is almost a trick question. Depending on when the drone was manufactured, you cannot use a module under Part 107. If it was manufactured after 9/1/2023, a drone must have Standard RID built-in by the manufacturer if it is being used for Part 107 work. If it is manufactured after 9/1/2023 and retrofitted with a module, it is not in compliance. This means it must have RID somehow built into either the flight controller code and have the hardware or into the ESC code. In theory, ESC code could be written so the drone doesn't arm if the right data hasn't been provided. . A company like DJI will likely have all their drones compliant because their software is not open source and therefore tamper proof and can have Standard RID built in. This makes it easier for them to get the Declaration of Compliance. Unlike a bind & fly unit that uses open source software. There is no compelling reason for a manufacturer of a bind & fly to build in RID when the FC software can be modified.

@N2TheOcean Год назад

Warehouses all of over the US are loaded up with drones for Christmas shoppers that do not know about this new bs rule.

@geezerpleasers_OG Год назад

Given that the driving factor is a supply chain issue, I don't see any indication that they'll be doing anything other than postponing the start date. They've said that they'll monitor any issues that arise, and they won't be monitoring anything until it goes live.

@geezerpleasers_OG Год назад

@@tanker7757 Materials to make the product is one thing. Manufacturers with capability and capacity to make the product in sufficient numbers is something else. It's supply chain.

@SunriseWaterMedia Год назад

What's crazy is that if I'm flying a 30 gram tiny whoop, filming a friend's music video, this is under Part 107 and adding a module would make it unflyable, which means I would need a bigger drone to hold the module, maybe less safe and less agile than a tiny whoop. 🤔

@azwb Год назад

Friends Music Video ---> Posted to RU-vid? ---> Montization? = Registration Required / Part 107

@AlienDrones Год назад

Wait, are you trying to apply logic to government? I think my brain just broke. 🧠

@ShaneInseine Год назад

Do you really think if you film this video and your friend post it to RU-vid that someone is going to report it to the FAA on the off chance that the pilot may have not been remote ID compliant? Or maybe the pilot was not licensed under 107? Do you really think the FAA would spend the resources to chase this information down and do a full investigation so that they can possibly get a fine out? I think people are being a little bit crazy with the paranoia.

@SunriseWaterMedia Год назад

@@azwb Exactly my point. Part 107 which means it needs a module, but the drone can't fly with a module. This is just nuts.

@SunriseWaterMedia Год назад

@@AlienDrones Sorry for breaking your brain, Keith. 🤣

@davideberhardt4977 Год назад

Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. But what is "unreasonable" and I guess it doesn't apply to individual citizens, or does it?

@solvend Год назад

They tried that argument and lost already

@ke4prf Год назад

Look for the DIY registration and repo, with some skills, you can create your own for home built drones for a fraction of what they are asking for them. The S3 Arduino module and GPS are less than $25 total. There is no reason for them to be selling for > $250. Stand alone units aren't compliant in the US unless there is an exemption that I don't know about. (No broadcast -> no fly rule) It's my understanding it has to be integrated with the flight controller in the US.. Someone show me where I'm incorrect for the US because they are simple to make and I have the parts already to create all I need for my home built drones.

@AlienDrones Год назад

That's a really innovative solution and sounds fun to boot, but in order for it to be legal for home build's I believe the module built would be required to be submitted and have an approved DOC from the FAA. Not that this is impossible, but probably more of a hassle than most are willing to bare.

@geezerpleasers_OG Год назад

PS: The really wacky part concerns sub-250 drones which have optional long life batteries that put them over 250g. For those drones, every time you swap out the lighter batteries and put in the heavier batteries, you have to register them and make them RID compliant, but when you put the lighter batteries back in, you can cancel the registration and turn off RID or remove the module.

@SlackerU Год назад

If the drone was manufactured with Remote ID then you can't turn it off even with the smaller batteries. I have a Mini 3 with only one battery, therefore I have never been over 250g, yet it has been broadcasting RemoteID & in any emergency it clearly shows a notification that the Remote ID is functioning properly.

@geezerpleasers_OG Год назад

@@SlackerU DJI drones have been broadcasting information about the drone's location, direction, speed, and serial number for at least a decade now, long before Remote ID was even a topic of discussion. There has never been a way to turn that off. The DJI Aeroscope system, which has been installed at major airports all over the US, has been receiving and recording that information the entire time. As for Remote ID, some drones will let you turn it off, some won't. It depends on the maker and the model.

@SlackerU Год назад

@@geezerpleasers_OG A search says Aeroscope systems were discontinued in the US but still active in Russia. No doubt though that it's probably just secret now as it didn't take two-weeks for plainclothes-randoms to approach me who oddly had aviation backgrounds. I fly an unregistered-RID in uncontrolled-airspace that's within tower-range of three controlled-airports.

@N2TheOcean Год назад

I use 5000mah batteries in my drone. I am looking at reducing weight with 3400. I am already just barely over 250g.. But with lesser capacity batteries, I might can get under that with a minimal loss in flight time. But the way I understand this new rule, you still have to have an identification beacon so you can always be tracked as to exactly where you are and where your drone is. Really ... what next? Your motor vehicles and motorboats? Sail boats? Kites?

@Pe5jJ9 Год назад

The personal security issues caused by broadcasting pilot/controller location are bad enough when flying out in public but I can legally fly from home. I certainly won't be broadcasting that location for all to see!

@WR3ND Год назад

Bro, you should get your ham radio license. There's a lot of overlap between the worlds and there's a lot you can do with it and if you're a nerd like me, it's a lot of fun too. Cheers.

@SlackerU Год назад

I agree, the hobby needs to have more discussion in those drone mods that require a FCC Ham Radio License.

@WW5RM Год назад

Yup! 73 WW5RM

@wismokey Год назад

Send me some swag 9. Thanks for the update. Last month I contacted FAA about the RID issue and my Mavic 2 Pro. I asked if they would delay implementation with all the supply issues. They said there would be no delay, and the date was set. But now they changed and have something i the works. I sold my M2P and bought an AIR 3 so I am compliant. Well, what's done is done and I like my new drone.

@AlienDrones Год назад

Well, on the upside, at least you ended up with a drone you like... 😎

@HoundDogMech Год назад

RID will be used 2 ways 1.) for enforcement of FAR's just asADS-B is recorded and stred so will be RID. 2.) It will be used to record your use of the NAS and just as commerical Droe opperators will be charched for their Use of the NAS so will all DRONE users be charged. Follow the Money Bro. If the Gobb-r-mnt can charge fo breathing NAS air they will.

@N2TheOcean Год назад

And the communist will seize our homes and other property if we do not obey their mandates.

@mattalford3932 Год назад

So basically no you cant use 1 module for all your part 107 drones. Nobody is going to go through all that.

@SlackerU Год назад

& you can only legally fly 1 drone at a time.

@YellowRoseDrones Год назад

@@SlackerUYou can only fly with one drone at a time, but I frequently fly multiple drones in sequence. Depending upon what the gig needs me to do. Fortunately, most of my drones are new enough to have it built in.

@0utcast Год назад

so give up the hobby. thats what the FAA wants and RID is designed to covertly do.

@richardamiss7000 Год назад

You're being too hopeful. "What relief might look like" will likely be "The rule is in place, but we won't enforce during the grace period".

@0utcast Год назад

which is not relief since i cant see how they are going to effectively enforce it to begin with. ALTHOUGH inability to enforce RID itself would be relief.

@SchubertTech Год назад

I just think there's too much confusion on where they intend to take this. I first hear it's just to see what, who and where is being flown. However, then I see it's going to be feeding into a mesh network with automation for historical look ups by LEO and the FBI. That's the over-reach, and from an RF perspective the failure. BT and Wifi don't transmit long distances, so unless we're going to have more RID collection points than cell towers, and the back office infrastructure to connect them, manage or store the data, etc. then it's already going to fail. Finally that's really my main beef with RID. If DJI builds it into my drone then I know it meets Title 15 and it's very unlikely to be causing RF issues. However, if I'm adding a module to an FPV drone, how do I know the command link or VTX isn't being affected? There are RF issues when co-locating transmitters, VTX, C2 and RID, and those won't have been tested. FPV drones can and are across multiple frequencies so there's no single answer, like there would be for a DJI type drone that's "plug and play (fly)" in nature. A FPV drone pilot should also be a Ham, and hence, we're expected to know the frequencies and power levels we are transmitting, and any issues it may be causing. We also may be over-reacting though. As I know Part 61 pilots also seem to be spotty in compliance with ADS-B Out. There's been a few cases where I'm flying my Air 2 and there's no information received from the Cessna 172 that's flying by. Should I call the FBI because "I don't know if they're a valid flight or friendly aircraft?" No, I just grumble and continue my flight operation. Send me some swag 107

@N2TheOcean Год назад

Believe me when I say ... soon our communist government will mandate that all motor vehicles must have tracking beacons for the purpose of road, highway, and interstate travel for law enforcement purposes.

@JustinDavito Год назад

I just passed my part 107 exam this last week, and there were some questions on the remote ID already.

@AlienDrones Год назад

What kind of questions? Just curious

@JustinDavito Год назад

@@AlienDrones There was one on if you could transfer it to another drone. Which you answered in this video. :) I believe there was another one on my first attempt on the test too but I don’t remember.

@weseehowcommiegoogleis3770 Год назад

Such a good Sheep, Now dont fly any paper planes with out the Module!

@N2TheOcean Год назад

@@weseehowcommiegoogleis3770 ... We are in Nazi Germany, now. Show me youz papers, pleasezzz/

@fishersaerialphotography121 Год назад

Thank you for the offer. I do not need any swag. I want to comment about your video. It is fantastic. I am part 107 certified and my air2s has a remote ID that is firmware updated. I went to the FAA website and my Drone is compliant. But I did not know about swapping the remote ID on those drones that need an external device. Because I knew they had to be registered. Thank you for educating me.

@Aeronca11 Год назад

I'm not so sure about the need to redo registration. That needs more clarification. I can't imagine the FAA wants more paperwork when a simple edit of a operator would due.

@fishersaerialphotography121 Год назад

@@Aeronca11 no re-registering the transmitter that attaches to the drone for the remote ID that needs to be re-registered if you move it from one Drone to another one at a cost five dollars each time

@AlienDrones Год назад

Thanks for taking the time to comment!

@frankmoreau8847 Год назад

I disagree with your answer to the question about a Part 107 pilot flying a sub 250 gram drone. The logic is the same as saying an airline pilot can't pilot an ultralight under Part 103 for fun because he is an airline pilot. If I have a TRUST certificate and a Part 107 I can fly under either authority, but I can't use a sub 250 gram drone for commercial work unless it has remote ID.

@AlienDrones Год назад

The condition is about flying recreationally under part 107. If you fly under 44809 and you satisfy the conditions of 44809 including the trust test, you're not flying recreationally under part 107.

@foellerd Год назад

Can you explain why you used the terms “recreational “ and “part107” at the same time to describe the same drone? The pilots either making money off it (part107) or isn’t(recreational), you can’t make money off it and not at the same time. Your words in the video, not mine.

@solvend Год назад

They have nothing to enforce it if you arent already flying illegally. They cannot even fully staff ATC towers or tech ops positions needed for ACTUAL aircraft.

@AlienDrones Год назад

Indeed, I think the enforcement capability is being significantly overestimated...

@jokerace8227 Год назад

Yes, the whole thing is a giant stupid joke for all of G Class airspace. (ツ) ☕☕(ツ)

@MrRaymond1021 Год назад

Send me some swag Keith. I'll pick # 55. You're videos are always fun and enjoyable. Thanks for sharing Keith.

@Twin_Flyer Год назад

Great video. My clubs FRIA request was denied so I ordered the module from Spektrum with the expectation the 2nd request will also be denied. Send me some swag please!

@SW-Video Год назад

Wait a second! Are you saying someone with a 107 cert has to have RID on drones under 250g when they are flying recreationally? That's crazy!

@AlienDrones Год назад

If you are flying recreationally under part 107, which means your drone has your 107 registration on it, you need RID. If you have your TRUST certificate and cancel the 107 registration on the drone and fly recreationally under 44809 then you do not have to have RID.

@SW-Video Год назад

@@AlienDrones Thank you. That's much better.

@yodaiam1000 Год назад

I am not confident that your answer about the Part 107 pilot flying recreationally with a sub 250. If they do not register the drone and it is sub 250 and is only ever flown recreationally, why would they need a remote ID? They only need the the RID if the drone is registered and I don't think there is a rule that says you have to register the drone in this case. You only have to register the sub 250 if it is flown under Part 107 and not that the pilot is a Part 107 pilot. Please let me know if I am wrong about that.

@AlienDrones Год назад

No worries, it's not about you, the pilot having your part 107, it's about your drone being registered under part 107. You _can_ fly recreationally, but under part 107, and in this case your drone needs to be registered and needs RID while you fly. If you want to fly completely recreational (assuming the drone is

@sullytrny Год назад

Flying sub 250 when they report me and start stuff. And everything's legal except there might not be a spotter. I just look at the guy, and say you were spotting me. Now you just don't want to admit it. Cause you wanted to start trouble. He agreed to be my spotter. ☯️♥️👀

@johnstrzyzewski7796 Год назад

Send me some swag 69. miss your opening video, when drone drops into water, while you are looking up.

@AlienDrones Год назад

Thanks for that, I'll try and include it more!

@RosaBevington Год назад

"Send me some SWAG - 167 - Great video!

@KaiOpua Год назад

50 for Hawaii the 50th state. I know, not eligible for the swag, but just wanted to say "mahalo nui" or thank you very much for the great info on the rid release.

@AlienDrones Год назад

Thanks for that! 🤙

@DennisStOnge Год назад

How about all New Drones must comply once chips are actually available beyond Ukraine.... and all existing Drones grandfathered in

@michaelwilson3946 Год назад

Home built for recreational use should be listed as experimental and exempt from rid. Rid is sadly here to stay, but they definitely need to make some changes. Freestyle, racing, and cinematic drones are not the same, including planes as well. Using one blankets salutation for all uav just isn't right. Obviously, all they needed was for it to get passed. Hopefully with community effort, we can have some rules amended in time. Clearly with no drone deliveries, I doubt they're in much of a hurry. Stay safe. Thanks for the update

@AlienDrones Год назад

Thanks! Can't disagree. I personally think the amount of likely non-compliance is being significantly underreported and underestimated and the amount and capability of enforcement is being significantly over estimated.

@YellowRoseDrones Год назад

You referred to a couple of videos in motioned to your upper left corner during the video, but the pop-ups never appeared. Hopefully it's in your video description instead.

@AlienDrones Год назад

Indeed, in the description as well. On some devices I'm told the videos don't pop up in the corner, should have mentioned they were in the description too... Was a late night trying to get this one done, blame it on sleep deprivation! 😴

@rjung_ch Год назад

Give my luck to someone in the lower 48, I live in Europe. My guess would have been 169.

@TRITONFPV Год назад

Curious question. Will FAA or Law Enforcement be carrying scales with them to weigh our drones to actually see if its over 250 grams??

@weseehowcommiegoogleis3770 Год назад

And upon WHAT are they adjusted and engineered to be accurate? My scales dont match any of theirs for some odd reason.

@inmyfreetyme Год назад

Thanks 4 this video. U Earned a LIKE from me. I learned quite a few things. Love the test questions also. I Subscribed to You Today. See U on your next educational video. Cheers !!!!😎😎😎😎

@AlienDrones Год назад

Glad it was helpful!

@HoundDogMech Год назад

Make the USA one big FREIA and then make ZONES where RID is required just as the places are Plackared as to how high U can fly.

@slapdat.byteme Год назад

I canceled RID for my drone fleet months ago, soI’m all set!

@kevinsmith9420 Год назад

"Ugly and her mom dresses her funny"😂

@AlienDrones Год назад

Wondering if anyone was going to comment on that or if it slipped by everyone... 😎

@RPar2236 Год назад

Send me some swag! I pick 48. Thanks for sharing this info and clarifying things for us!

@richardstutler3058 Год назад

How about a grandfather Claus!

@AlienDrones Год назад

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_GkvNlRYtqc.htmlsi=EyFyDusO4NZLbbn2

@princessmoccasin4279 Год назад

Could be flying FAA approved area no remote needed

@AlienDrones Год назад

You are correct, "could" be in a FRIA, BUT the description of the area being picturesque with a river and a park negates every FRIA I've ever seen or heard about. Usually they are a crowded barren field of some sort... 🤙

@timtrottproductions Год назад

You don’t pay $5 to change a registration.

@AlienDrones Год назад

If you cancel the registration and complete a new on, it is $5.

@cayminlast Год назад

Have they (FAA) made it almost impossible to keep up with the new rues and regulations and taken all the fun out of the model aviation hobby? YES. Is it not worth the effort to continue participating in the hobby? YES

@TechJB65 Год назад

Send me some swag please!! My number guess is 107. Good information!! Keep it up!!

@joepowers3731 Год назад

Thank for all the info . I ordered the Db120 Module and I am going to do the Karen hack on it. Thanks for all you do. We would be screwed without you. Send me some swag 120. I really need an Alien Drones sticker.

@AlienDrones Год назад

You didn't pick the correct number, but if you send me your info to the email address in the vis I'll get you a AD sticker! 🤙

@joepowers3731 Год назад

YOU ROCK !!!!!!!!!!!@@AlienDrones

@foellerd Год назад

#2: so what you are saying is anybody who obtains a commercial drone pilot license (to make money from flying) can never fly a sub 250g drone recreationally without remote ID ever again? If that’s not what you meant then you left out some important wording. “Recreational” means “NOT part107” by definition, so you are also saying that those two things can be true at once somehow. Do explain.

@AlienDrones Год назад

Hello! I know it is a bit confusing, but making money is NOT the criteria which makes a flight part 107 or recreational. You can fly recreationally under part 107 and you can fly recreationally under 44809. Both of them are viable, but part 107 "recreational" is simply semantics, meaning you are flying for fun, not performing a "commercial" mission at that moment. You can fly under part 44809 (even if you are a part 107 certified pilot) you just need to take the trust test, follow recreational rules including the rules of a CBO and if sub 250g, remove the part 107 registration number from your drone. If the drone is above 249g then to fly 44809, technically you would need to deregister the drone from your part 107 fleet, add the RID number to DroneZone and apply your 44809 (recreational) registration number to the drone.

@DoorCountyDronebyMarkEvenson Год назад

Send me some swag. 107. Pilot Institute is the best!! Great video!!

@AlienDrones Год назад

Thanks! 🤙🤙 They do a great job for sure!

@HoundDogMech Год назад

Part 107 U register the dron if Recreational fling it the Pilots registration that has to be on the out side of the craft True/False?

@MrBmca Год назад

Send me som swag. Best source for drone information , thumbs up. 👍 two like

@GrauFPV Год назад

The only solution is to just say F the FAA and not abide by overstepping rules

@bobbylefebvre6298 Год назад

Really great cool channel nice information

@robertwilliams7090 Год назад

Thank you for your information!! You are the best! Please send me some swag #9 Thanks!

@rjung_ch Год назад

Thanks! 👍💪✌

@AlienDrones Год назад

No problem 👍

@WR3ND Год назад

I do have one question, actually... If the drone doesn't need to be registered (less than 250g) and is being flied recreationally, but I have gone ahead and registered it anyway and applied the FAA registration number to it, does it then need remote ID? Thanks.

@WR3ND Год назад

It would seem counterproductive to all intents to need to unregister a drone to be able to fly it without Remote ID. 🤔 But maybe that's just me. 🤷‍♂

@SlackerU Год назад

If you're flying under-250g recreationally without Remote ID then you'd probably not want registration numbers written on the outside of the drone. If it is a Remote-ID certified DJI then the serial number is the RID number so it'd already be in your registration, I think.

@WR3ND Год назад

Thanks. This isn't a hypothetical question for me. The drone is a DJI Mini SE, which is not remote ID compliant (unless there's a firmware update looming that I'm unaware of), and is less than 250g. I feel a bit more secure having it registered with the recreational registration number on it and in the event that it was lost or similar, it might be able to be recovered and accounted for. I'm not trying to get away with anything with it and only intend to use it responsibly and in accordance with recreational guidelines. I think it is critically important that we keep the viability of the recreational aspect of the hobby and not feel threatened into becoming commercial UAS pilots, at least for those that clearly by common sense standards aren't and don't intend to be. So, hence my question. Cheers.

@SlackerU Год назад

@@WR3ND It will probably never be RID compliant b/c even the FPV only offers Remote-ID-Support b/c it can't 'broadcast' therefore can't get US-certified. It's probably why the Mini 4 is coming out so soon as the 3 PRO is only 'RemoteID-Friendly'. My Mini 3 is definitely broadcasting b/c it lets me know with on-screen notifications, I get 24 minutes of hover or 20-22 minutes of Sport-mode playing under-250g.

@mickhawkes2882 Год назад

I think there are more people that find drones annoying,than there are people concerned about legalities.The police are being called regardless

@Ariesdrone603 Год назад

Remote ID came through congress? What country?

@AlienDrones Год назад

In 2016, Congress passed a law requiring the FAA to develop standards, issue regulations, and provide guidance for the remote identification of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS).

@Ariesdrone603 Год назад

I recall that the FAA was chomping at the bit to regulate UAVs but they were explicitly restricted from taking action. I see a safe drone act from 2015 and it made it out of committee but as far as I can tell, it was not voted on. Also, it was related to flying in a newly designed "restricted zone" defined as being with 2 miles of an airport or any temporary airspace that the govt indicates needs to be restricted. Any chance you know the bill number? @@AlienDrones

@AlienDrones Год назад

PUBLIC LAW 114-190-JULY 15, 2016 130 STAT. 615 Excerpt: _SEC. 2202. IDENTIFICATION STANDARDS. (a) IN GENERAL.-The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, the President of RTCA, Inc., and the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, shall convene industry stakeholders to facilitate the development of consensus standards for remotely identifying operators and owners of unmanned aircraft systems and associated unmanned aircraft_

@Leonardokite Год назад

I think I'm missing something. I thought that in order for remote ID to be transmitted it had to go through your phone internet. It is sounding from what you say that it is actually transmitted locally. Anyhow, so go ahead and send me some swag hahaha and let's do 111!!

@AlienDrones Год назад

Indeed, remote ID is currently a local broadcast coming from the drone or a module, Bluetooth or WiFi. No internet is used at this point. It was initially proposed to require internet when the UTM was being proposed, but that requirement was dropped from the rule for now.

@Leonardokite Год назад

@@AlienDrones Thank you for clearing up my misconception. 👍

@frankmoreau8847 Год назад

@@AlienDrones I live about a mile off of US 97 in Washington. There is no internet or cell phone signal beyond about 2 miles of US 97. If that rule ever came into effect, remote areas like this won't be able to fly anything.

@aloftdrone Год назад

"Send me some swag". My number is: 107. 😀

@donclark8673 Год назад

Don't worry,.......... It'll get worse!!!!

@SlackerU Год назад

I do not like any of this. I have a Mini 3 that has been broadcasting Remote ID for months but the DJI FPV is still not certified for broadcast. I sent in a complaint that I must delay my 'faster than a dodge viper' purchase yet officers in my county pull out in front of teen motorcycle drivers causing life ending changes to lives with no life-saving Remote ID necessary.

@YellowRoseDrones Год назад

The DJI FPV drone just had a firmware update on August 31st, that makes it compliant with remote ID. I just installed it on mine last night and the status now says that it's working properly. Now I have to go to the FAA drone zone and update my registration for that drone.

@SlackerU Год назад

@@YellowRoseDrones I want one but sadly you're mistaken & it's not Remote ID Compliant to the newest RID standards. I asked DJI the other day & was told I still need to attach a RemoteID module to the DJI FPV in order to be FAA compliant. From what I read online the RID on their FPV doesn't 'broadcast' so they can't get compliance.

@marktomlinson6714 Год назад

Send me some swag 21. Thanks for the content!

@HighlanderMikeGolf Год назад

Thanks Keith. I ordered the Karen-proof DB-120 based on your review. It arrived last week. Send me some swag 1 (just like the discount on my Rid Module) 😂

@Abb0nz1 Год назад

Informative video but I thinkthe "moving the module" was a bit of a stretch 🙂 Oh, and send me some swag! #114

@WW5RM Год назад

Rules? We dont need no stinking rules! =]

@HoundDogMech Год назад

RID is NOT about SAFTEY or any other damed thing the say it is INFACT all about the MONEY .... RID will be used to charge for the USE of NAS and like Barreta used to say "U can take that to the BANK".

@AlienDrones Год назад

Baretta, lol. That takes me back! Those disguises! 😂

@joymakerRC Год назад

thanks bro

@AlienDrones Год назад

No problem!

@billkendall6876 Год назад

Send me Some Swag. I got all the questions right including the moving the ID my response was False unless you change the registration. So I count that is being right ... Pttth.

@kevinwells4986 Год назад

\ery confusing,. Also supportive. Of confusion. Why? Definitive numbers. Not weight. Except use. And license. Remote ID? Apple. iPhone. Good luck.

@benpacheco1553 Год назад

I enjoyed your presentation.. however, I am in disagreement with your "Karen" scenario for several reasons: Reason 1: To preface it with a "Karen" as a viewer of a potential rogue drone was.. well-biased. I am a Part 107 aviator and I view any and all spectators of my drone operations (Karens included) rather as "non-participants", not nusiances to my operation. Reason 2: If you are operating commercially, even for improving skills, parks.. backyard.., etc. You should have given advanced notice for doing this through means of "preflight validation". Example: Notice to the management/ownership of the flight path, B4UFLY, signage posting, wearing of a safety vest, all drones equipped with bright navigation lights/FAA ID, and the use of visual observers supporting the same. I try and approach it this way, the more I "pre-educate" the users of the ground in/around a flight path, the less interference with my use of the air ✌ Reason 3: I'm thinking..., the FAA purposely and with forethought is inviting the public to interact anonymously with drone operators via RID because they don't have enough "eyes" to police what will become hyperactive "low-altitude" airspace. Consider the cost savings (nationally) for not having to construct, operate, and train operators of "Droneports" versus R.I.D. modules at the expense of the operators... Hmmmmmm 🤔? Now let me be clear. We drone operators (Part 107) will always need to be prepared to define/defend our "drone presence" if questioned by law enforcement, FAA officials, or the curious "parallel observer" to your operation. It really should be expected and in most respects welcomed. See it as an opportunity to explain the drone profession or express your ability to safely operate the SUAV. If there is a viable threat to your operation, delay or delete it. I think there are other options as well if prepared ahead of time. I have operated "commercially" in the S. Eastern corridors for about a year now. I have experienced (0) zero negativity or threat to my person or my drone. Instead, I have had multiple opportunities to give some parents and their children a "short lesson" on drone safety and drone craft. Also, some I suppose (potential Karens), stopped by my flight "home area".. asked questions, viewed the layout, and then thanked me for giving them a minute. I see it as part of the "re-education" effort knowing drones have been given a "bad rep" from illegal or illegitimate use, and the media happily reporting this. Again, enjoyed your presentation, just wish it had a different "tone". We need everyone (including Karen) to understand, appreciate, and welcome the presence of drones 🥰in our lives, it seems both are here to stay!

@AlienDrones Год назад

Hey, no worries, I appreciate and understand your perspective! We wish the tone could be different as well, however, we will agree to disagree and make no apologies for our content. We have also had many great experiences with the curious in general. Many! But, our perspective is not biased but more fully informed by experiences that you have not yet experienced that I truly hope you will _never_ be forced to personally endure as a drone pilot. However, once you are targeted by violent and/or ill meaning non-participants as we have it will change your perspective of the _possible_ experience. It's scary as hell and nearly made us hang up our remotes. Unfortunately, remote ID by design makes this negative experience _more_ likely, not less. We are not a "tinfoil hat" fringe either, this concern has been corroborated by law enforcement itself many times formally to the FAA that it adds additional potential danger to citizens. We agree that RID is here to stay, however disagree that we have to ignore or be accepting of the new dangers and negative aspects it also adds to an otherwise great hobby and feel it would be a disservice to not reflect our actual experiences and concerns in our content. Remove the ability for the general public to legally locate and track other citizens via RID and leave that ability to law enforcement or FAA and the tone of RID videos will change to indifference, to be sure. Good Flying! 😎👽

@nateteator3901 Год назад

Can a 107 pilot legally fly a recently home built?

@AlienDrones Год назад

That's a good question, and I think officially the answer might be no. I believe it has to be manufactured with standard remote ID and has to have an approved DOC with the FAA to be legal. So you'd have to submit your model to the FAA and get it approved to strictly follow the rule... I'm sure someone with more FPV experience might have more information, just my take on the rule itself...

@nateteator3901 Год назад

@@AlienDrones Correct, so then how does an individual start a drone Manufactuing business? Just building and testing the prototype would be illegal. I was hoping to develop a product and then realized it was not legal to do so.

@Guitarist33764 Год назад

Great video. Tha ja for the update. "send me some swag" #107

@Loco_Lui Год назад

It's not even SLIGHTLY practical to move a module used for Part 107 use. It's absurd to expect people to spend hundreds or thousands of $$$$ to outfit all their drones with modules. Won't happen.... not unless they make the $20 mark.

@charlescouncill Год назад

Remote ID is a precursor to confiscation.

@0utcast Год назад

doubtful BUT it is designed to frustrate people out of the hobby so its more like passive confiscation via people getting rid of their drones themselves.

@weseehowcommiegoogleis3770 Год назад

That Yellow star comes to mind. RID is the required Identifier. NAZI Germany all over again.

@randysaunders-o4k Год назад

send me some sway 165

@AG4KN Год назад

Thanks for the info! Send me some swag! Number 13

@skykingimagery899 Год назад

It was always a stupid and unnecessary requirement. Who did it benefit? Who is harmed by not having ID? Just more bureaucratic nonsense.

@kennethlowe4293 Год назад

Thanks for the updates. Send me some swag. 52

@reysicastro4242 Год назад

Hey i love your videos, im a begginer and looking for a budget drone under 300 can you please give me a recomendation. I hope you see this comment. Thanks in advanced.

@AlienDrones Год назад

For under 300 it's tough to get a high functioning, reliable drone, but the best one I've seen in this price range it the Potensic ATOM SE. Has EIS, but not a gimbal, but is a really good flier. There's a model coming out I can't talk about, it's currently stuck in customs, and it has a gimbal and if it works out may fit you're bill... Stay tuned.

@reysicastro4242 Год назад

@@AlienDrones nice, thank you so much for the info, I had that one because of ypur videos. I will wait until your review for the bew model. Thanks

@AlienDrones Год назад

@@reysicastro4242 Fingers crossed it is a winner...🤞

@daniellundy Год назад

Send me some swag. 156. Thanks for the video.

@mjc8459 Год назад

👍

@pr3vail Год назад

@pastorray5947 Год назад

Send me some swag 107

@joymakerRC Год назад

send me some sway 79

@HighlanderMikeGolf Год назад

My wife said send me some swag 74

@rrittenhouse Год назад

Send me some swag! #107 🤣

@dosdeasada Год назад

Send me some swag 107

@PikevilleDroneServices Год назад

“Send me some swag” 161

@Androidfan2011 Год назад

189. Please send me some cool swag!

@phaTrax_Studio_Productions Год назад

Send me some swag! 107

@3halseys Год назад

Send me some swag 101

@KMLmfk Год назад

Very informative as always! Send me some swag!😂 144

@luismartinez-my1nk Год назад

Wanna know the reason for Remote ID? The yahoos who keep violating airspace rules and whining about the evil gov'ment telling us what to do? We only have ourselves to blame.

@AG4KN Год назад

Send me some swag! Number 103