Repertoire: The BEST and WORST Sibelius Symphony Cycles 

I play in the Vänskä/Lahti recording! Was a nice experience. Provincial orchestra but very motivated!

Rozhdestvensky: all the charm and subtlety of the Finnish hinterland as viewed from the inside of a T-34 tank.

This is no slog, this is a delight--thanks very much! Here are the ones I return to most frequently--I'm surprised that there is so much overlap with you, Dave! 1. Berglund/Bournemouth--This was put on sale just after Berglund died--I was instantly blown away. 2. Davis/BSO--My first encounter with Sibelius was this recording of the 2d. Still terrific, if not quite Szell! 3. Segerstam/Helsinki--Bought on your recommendation--thank you! 4. Maazel/VPO--Really enjoy his 1st and 3d. 5. Vanska/Lahti--The speedy 1st riveted me and was worth Amazon's bargain download price. 6. Gibson/RSNO--Never noticed the imperfections until you mentioned them! 7. Bernstein/NYPO--I always forget how good this cycle is until I go back to it. 8. Davis/LSO. Really, I just love the disc with the 3d and 7th, and Kullervo. 9. Abravanel/Utah. What it lacks in technical, makes up for in character. 10. Blomstedt. Yep, one of the most consistent cycles--no weak links.

My first cycle as a teenager was watanabe. My dad did the record cover design. I was lucky. He brought home all the promotional copies from epic and Columbia and I got to hang out with McClure and Paul Myers, to great producers.

Great review David. We absolutely love your honesty and strong opinion on the quality of the performances. It's so refreshing to hear someone so transparent and honest rather than being tainted, or shall I say "bought" to give a glowing review of a performance that is clearly anything but great, and that's what I don't like about Gramophone Magazine reviews, and most others too. Love your sense of humor too (I agree with your cat's review lol), and your colorful adjectives to describe your feelings as I'd do the same if I was a reviewer! You are a very funny guy, and this review is not only very informative, it's also hilarious!

This is awesome. I was introduced to Sibelius' music during the pandemic lockdown of 2020-2021, and I'm glad I was introduced to Segerstam's recording of the second symphony. Beautiful, beautiful music! I'm gonna go look for his Sibelius cycle right now.

Great Sibelius review. Thank you for your insights. Over the years I have heard many of the cycles you covered, and am in general agreement. Bernstein, Davis/Boston, Maazel/Vienna, and Berglund/Bournemouth are among my favorites. I also strongly favor EMI's now deleted box coupling Bergland II with his Kullervo from Bournemouth and a huge cache of tone poems, minor orchestral works, and even a couple of rarely heard cantatas. That box may will be available and is a very worthwhile investment. I wish Ormandy had recorded a complete cycle; what he did leave us, particularly the earlier ones for Columbia, are superb. For whatever reason he avoided 3 and 6; maybe he found them inscrutible. Finally I want to say how much I appreciated seeing a that photo of your kitty in repose.

David, I truly cherish your video reviews. Thank you for putting them together and sharing them with us. You're very clear about why you do and don't like certain recordings with enough qualifiers to make a good point.

Great material, David. Thanks!

Just before I found your excellent videos, I splurged on a several box sets. One of those is the BSO Sibelius cycle mentioned here, chosen because it was the BSO and Im provincial about my home town orchestra. 😊 Glad to hear that you didn’t trash it! Entertaining and informative review, as always.

I keep forgetting that Vic Firth was timpanist in Boston. It reminds me there is a quite incredible piece (“Pneuma”) by a prog/rock/metal band (I know, a different world) called Tool featured in a live “drumcam” video put out by Vic Firth (the market-dominating drumstick company) that is not to be missed. Not just because it’s practically a percussion concerto full of polyrhythms and uneven time signatures (but nevertheless always solidly in a groove), but also the song has unusually good structure and fundamentals from a classical perspective, with great buildups, almost Sibelian at times. Very powerful in a symphonic sense and very unlike other rock or metal music.

Great talk as always David! Cheers!

the video i've been waiting 6 months for :D

Thank you so much for this survey! A truly magnificent magnum opus video! I haven’t the Blomstedt, but will buy, plus the others, in the great pile, also I have one.

Great video. Thanks for the recommendations.

Glad to see your praise of the Davis/BSO cycle. I have that, but I also wouldn't want to be without the Bernstein/NYPO recording of the 5th. :)

Thank you, that was truly enlightening. I have five complete cycles, with the Gibson the highest in your list. The Kamu is my personal favourite, but I do intend to level up, and your list gives me the right incentive.

Great reviews! Thank you for this most valuable service! You mentioned re: the Colin Davis/BSO offering, the importance of the "Vic Firth" tympany in the overall recording. An observation: My initial exposure to these recordings (in the 80's) was on vinyl. Not being a vinyl fan, I was happy when this cycle was eventually released on CD. However... On the vinyl recordings, I was used to booming tympany, about 10½ minutes into the 3rd movement of Symphony #4. Sadly, the engineers chose to deemphasize the tympany when they "remastered" for the CD release; to the degree that I no longer desired to listen to this version; it had lost its punch! Beware of remastering! My 2¢.

Thanks, a great survey. I have five of your top recommendations in my collection.... (Vanska\ Lahti, Berglund\ Bournemouth, Segerstam. Davis\Boston and Blomstedt)....

Great review! Most enjoyable - thank you.

Thank you for the wonderful review for novice collectors! Three box sets have already been ordered!

I bought the Blomstedt Sibelius cycle based on a previous video you did and love it. It really elevated my view of the Sibelius symphonies. But since they're practically giving away the Berglund/Bournemouth set and it has almost 80 minutes of tone poems included, I ordered it too.

The Maazel box was my baptism into Sibelius 30 years ago (followed shortly after by Esa-Pekka Salonen’s Kullervo and Lemminkäinen Suite). It got lost in a move before I could compare it with any others (though Neeme Järvi has been a decent replacement), so I was glad to hear that I got lucky in my initiation!

Very enlightening. I have Davis with the BSO on two double cds, including the other works mentioned here, plus the Barbirolli box (I'm not an expert in Sibelius, so I'll still listen to it), and a double CD of Berglund and Bournemouth playing Kullervo and other works, but not the symphonies. It's good to have an expert's recommendation of 7 excellent sets and 5 very good ones.

I owe one not complete cycle (Karajan, divided between EMI and DG recordings) and two complete, which I have always considered really beautiful for different reasons: Davis/Boston and Sanderling (I like so much that "German" approach). I am happy to have my impression confirmed! 😊 I will try for sure to grab Blomsted and/or Segerstam. Thanks for your always interesting and useful videos!

Phrase of 2020 from a music critic, "A simmering cauldron of blandness!" Brilliant!

I like to think those people who organise the BBC Proms heard your Sibelius talks David! His 2nd Symphony is the centrepiece of the opening night! Great stuff!

I just listened to the Berglund recording of the fifth symphony. A real knockout! My favorite to date. Thanks, Dave! I'm really looking forward to the other six symphonies in the set, and to the top two cycles on your list. (Could there be a better fifth in the offing? Doesn't seem possible.)

Blomstedt's 5th is exeptional in part 1 : It's a great foggy landscape of nature: Awakening & Disappearing. The timpanist makes overwhelming rolling thunders before the music disappears in the fog, by slowering the tempo and lowering the volume. and after that uprising with great forces. Sibelius & Blomstedt: Genius!

I have the Berglund, symphonies (Helsinki) and the tone poems ( Bournemouth) in one EMI box (2001). Never compared them to other versions, so I'm glad to hear they are pretty good I'm not that much of a Sibelius fan, but will listen to the favorite box if I can get a hold on it.

Excellent review, thank you. My sentimental favorite (because it was my first) is Akeo Watanabe/Japan Philharmonic on Epic lp.

Gibson is a nice pick, maybe overlooked by some folks. Loved his account of the third (bought on fine Chandos LP years ago) and the tone poems.

Hello Dave, Thank you for infotaining with knowledge and humour! Even more thank you for providing a personal opinion in these days! :-) Any thoughts about Hannu Lintu's cycle with the finish RSO from 2015 (on DVD/bluray/youtube) ? Thanks a lot!

Entertaining video, Dave. Enjoyed the categories too. My senior school music teacher introduced me to Alexander Gibson's recordings back in the early 90s and he made a lot of good records with the Scottish National Orchestra, his Sibelius really is excellent and you are right to give it a recommendation as I think it is often overlooked, especially these days. I totally agree as well with your high praise for Maazel/VPO and Berglund's Bournemouth cycle... Let's be honest, he inherited a great band from Silvestri and he made the most of it! I was aware of his Helsinki cycle but you mentioned a third cycle, was this with the Chamber Orchestra of Europe? I may have a listen to it to check it out. I also don't mind Sakari Oramo's cycle from Birmingham, it's not the best but I think it is "good" throughout. Vanska's Lahti cycle is up there for me also, your point about them being more of a chamber band absolutely comes through with the extreme dynamics in the final movement of #2.

Another superb presentation. Thank you, David. Have to disagree about John Barbirolli ! Colin Davis set a very high bar with his peerless Boston set on Philips Duo. I've owned it for many years, and it still sends a thrill and a chill down my spine. May I just ask if you have any thoughts on Neeme Jarvi's RCA set with the Orchestre de Paris? I ask simply because if I'm not mistaken, you are (as I am) rather partial to French orchestras. I look forawrd to your forthcoming presentations. Maybe a Sibelius violin concerto...?

After years of waiting I finally found a copy on CD of the Ehrling set (issued here by Mercury back in the day). It was much too expensive, and the recordings are mono, but I was pleasantly surprised by the performances, and the sound was fairly good.

Dear Dave, I must congratulate and thank you for this Sibelius cycle review. Not only did I find myself in agreement for the most part, but I discovered the true extent of my obsession. 28 cycles, 11 Kullervos, plus hundreds of other recordings. I AM NOT ALONE!

Maazel's cycle with the VPO, 'wonderful' indeed. Tried Blomstedt on your recommendation and was very put off by his heavy-footed prosaic sixth, Maazel's sixth is just magical. DAVE ... is there any chance you can do a survey of the Mount Everest of solo violin works, Bach's Sonatas and Partitas?

I have the cycle with Colin Davis and the London Symphony, the one from the LSO Live series. I absolutely love it.

I've lost count of the number of CDs of Sibelius symphonies in my possession after 40 years of collecting, but the cycles I have are very consistent to my way of thinking: Berglund/Bournemouth, Vänska/Lahti, Davis/Boston and yes, Noddy too ('Noddy' being the nickname the BBC SO players gave Gennady). All have something to say about this music that's been in my bloodstream since for ever, and all the better for being so contrasting.

I am very fussy about Sibelius symphonies, I can’t stand 2, 4 & 6! I just love 1, 3, 5 & 7. The Davis/Boston set is great.

Hi David this was great. A magnificent talk...I have all the cycles in the dysfunctional and superlative categories. And really the only one I have an issue is the Maazel. I really cannot abide by his 3rd symphony in Vienna and the 5th as you pointed out is too fast in places. I don’t like hi 2nd as well, just a shade too cool for me. But that is very personal as I happen to like the Ashkenazy 2nd which really hangs fire but it was my first foray into Sibelius and in India heard it on a cheap cassette. What is your view on Inkinen and his Naxos cycle? And the first Jarvi...I gathered it was uneven from your talk. Thanks again.

Nice to see Segerstam up there in the top few. He was much liked in the Philharmonia, but of course liked conducting his own works too. I've certainly loved playing Sibelius with him. I love big personalities when we often just get big egos. Of course, big personalities can have big egos too, but it's nice to see the flair first. Less popular with some of my colleagues over the years were people like Lazarev and Simonov - possibly having more flair than respect for the sanctity of tradition - but I loved playing with those conductors.

Thanks for another great discussion. I simply love sibelius. He's really one of my favorite composers. I got introduced to him via sanderling, so this is my reference set. I especially love his third symphony, one of the fastest tempos I heard, along with gibson and kondarshin. And I realized I really like my sibelius on the fast and upbeat side. I have no patience for conductors who drag him along. I thank you for introducing me to gibson. His set is really wonderful in my opinion. I don't know about buying it, but it is on the streaming apps. And how about discussing Scandinavian composers who are not called sibelius, Nielsen or grieg? I would love such a discussion and recommendations.

My pared-down list of favorites; 2: a Tanglewood performance, vintage 1976 or so, of Davis and the Boston. The animal response of the audience could only be compared to a Callas opera performance. Also, Barbirolli's Chesky version. :5: Barbirolli/Halle and Davis/Boston (the Phillips recording). 7: Ormandy. There are many great versions with which I supplement these, including Sagerstam.

I learned how important timpani parts are in Sibelius symphonies at a Maazel/VPO concert at Carnegie Hall in 2012. It was 1, 5, and 7. They were performed in reverse order, which kind of irked me! Anyway, I was mesmerized watching the timpanist in Sibelius 1. We all know there’s lots of timpani in that symphony, but it was a big “Whoa!” experiencing it first-hand.

Wondering about your views on Jarvi père (Neeme) - he did two with Goteborg: first on BIS, second on DG.

Just listened to symph 1 to 3 in recent release by Orchestre de Paris under Paavo Jarvi. I'm not sure on a first listening, have you reviewed it?

Spot on as usual Dave. I have a particular fascination for the Sixth. Choice of tempi is crucial - there are those conductors who feel the whole work really gravitates back to one tempo. The last movement is especially problematic. It's marked Allegro molto up to just before the coda when it becomes Allegro assai (faster, slower, the same??) and the basic pulse holds through the doppio più lento. Sibelius doesn't mark for any slackening of tempo through the coda but most conductors assume that's what he intended anyway. Yet, Sibelius was usually scrupulous about his tempi - did he *really* intend for the Allegro molto/assai to be adhered to right through the movement? Vänskä is the only one who does this. First time I heard it I was gobsmacked. But it works, and 'the shadows lengthen' as Sibelius describes. Berglund and Segerstam both choose tempi well under Allegro molto at the start of the movement - to allow them to match the slower tempi that they elect to use in the coda. Which also works. Because of these sorts of considerations I regard the Sixth as a kind of litmus test as to whether the conductor has done their homework or not, and cycles tend to rise up or fall down on account of them.

I have Berglund I & II, Bernstein/NY, Davis/Boston, Blomstedt/San Francisco and Mazzel/Vienna. Honestly haven't felt any need to expand my collection. (I also have the Barbirolli but that's only because it came in the complete Warner box set) But with any or even just a couple of those top choices for variation I don't see how anyone could be unhappy.

Just wanted to add this... A few weeks ago I watched your discussion on Taneyev. Recieved my CD Taneyev 4/ Jarvi/ Philharmonia...WOW!!! This afternoon is first chance I've had to sit down with it, and it has been a Fantastic,Musical Joy...Can't thank you enough. Now I need to decide what of his to get next 😁 Thanks again 👍

Thanks for this review ... I've ordered the Colin Davis set; couldn't get the Blomstedt even through Amazon ... not available. Any idea where you can find it?

Like very much you lexicon, which is an obvious condition to be a critic. Very good take on box sets I mostly have! (And in spite of disagreements.)

Love your introductions., "..for reason I can't explain." I don't think I have even one cycle of Sibelius Symphonies.

So true about orchestras playing loud and conductors getting in the way.

I have three of the top seven, Davis, Berglund and Maazel. And they are great. I still have some attachment to Barbirolli/Halle - it is not that bad - surely!! I have the Davis on Philips Duos, and always felt the sound a bit subdued. Were these remastered at any point?

Curious why Herbie von K. did not do a complete cycle, since his BPO 4th through 7th, coupled with a variety of the tone poems, are excellent. Any thoughts / comments?

Hi Dave, curious as to what you think about the new Klaus Mäkelä cycle with Oslo?

Funfact: there are 44 existing cycles ;) As a huge Sibelius geek I do own 43 of them, the only one missing is Arvo Volmer/Adelaide SO. So maybe a few additions to your list: Sixten Ehrlings cycle in my opinion is a quite good cycle, (it was the first cycle at all) even though it is mono. Paavo Järvis recent cycle also is a really nice one. Watanabes first cycle is also not bad, his second one falls a bit behind. I liked Ashkenazy's second one as well, Inkinen's both cycles are good too, even though they fall a bit flat in terms of emphasis. An insider tip is Tadaaki Otaka's cycle, while hard to get and rather expensive, really surprised me in a good way, especially for the 4th and 5th symphony. Hannu Lintu's cycle (even though only available on DVD/BluRay) is great for the bonus documentations, the symphonies are nicely played but a bit mannered. Two of the cycles that didn´t got mentioned here are Mark Elder's and Sakari Oramo's, unfortunately both are more of a snooze :/

Herbert Blomstedt is 93 years old (born July 11, 1927). Still waiting for a complete Blomstedt/San Francisco box. I hope Decca isn't waiting for an In Memoriam box. I know you liked the 15 CD box, but a lot of the items not in that box are hard to find and/or expensive.

I applaud your efforts in this expansive talk! I have never heard the Anthony Collins recordings, buy have seen them reissued and talked about many times. It would be easy for someone to accidentally and unknowingly fall for the hype. Fortunately I did not fall for it!

Dear Dave, On your recommendation, I purchased the Segerstam-Helsinki cycle. It is really wonderful, and its trip to my location was an adventure in itself. It came from Athens, Greece by surface mail, and the box was in mint condition upon arrival. I note that Segerstam has this Santa Claus look about him. This is consistent with a Swedish-Finnish family that I used to know. They all sat on the lawn on one fine summer day, and all the men looked like Segerstam. But we were discussing Finnish music, not the appearance of Finnish people. Sorry.

David, I think you are a bit harsh on Davis with the LSO... I was the tape editor on this set, so when you talk about the orchestra getting lost and 'a bar out for the entire coda of the first movement of the 5th', I thought, 'OMG, did I mess up an edit?'. I went back to the original marked-up score, which I still have after all these years, and there is no edit for the last 10 or so pages. And as far as I can tell, the timpanist and everyone else are rock-solid and on the beat. Great impression of Robert Leyton...

Loved this review as Sibelius is my favorite composer. Interestingly, one doesn't have to listen to the "best" to learn to love a piece of music: for me the door that opened an appreciation for Sibelius symphonies was a 1930's Beacham recording of Symphony #4!

Speaking of chamber orchestras (Lahti), there is a quite nice video here on RU-vid of the River Oaks Chamber Orchestra (ROCO) of Houston Texas (who?) conducted by Michael Stern (who?) doing the 7th quite surprisingly wonderfully.

Thank you David for this informative examination of the various Sibelius symphony cycles. It brought forth a memory from when I was at Cornell University in the late 1960's- George Szell and Cleveland Symphony came and played the Sibelius Second Symphony- what an unforgettable performance! We were fortunate at Cornell, we were on the tour circuit for many great artists, another one that I remember vividly was Regine Crespin. I expect, and hope that Cornell continues that tradition. I now live near Johns Hopkins University and they continue a wonderful chamber music series at Shriver Hall, to which I subscribe. best wishes.

Interesting assessment of Blomstedt. Generally, his stuff starts out strong on me but then wears thin over time. But not in Sibelius. I concur that is very fine throughout. And perhaps the best or "safest" set over all. I would give it an A-. However, someone mentioned these: Bernstein, Davis/Boston, Maazel/Vienna, and Berglund/Bournemouth EMI. I would concur that these are my keepers. And in that order. For years, the Maazel/Vienna was my choice as the "greatest". However, over time, for some strange reason, I gravitate to the Bernstein/CBS ( not the DG singles which are intriguing in their own way.) The Berglund seems to be on my keepers but listen to it least. That said, still feel the Maazel 7th, and maybe some more of his, is amongst the greatest recordings in music. For fun, let me upset the apple cart. Love the Barbirolli / EMI box. And am not alone. Not saying it's good of bad, but love it.

Vänskä’s Mahler 10 is fantastic IMO. What’s your opinion ?

Karajan did the 6th very well back in the 60s for DG I thought (and the 5th and 7th, and 4th I guess), but never as far as I know recorded the 3rd at all. But he did the 1st and 2nd on EMI at another time. The 1st was good, though with curiously thin sonics, but I wasn’t as convinced by the 2nd. (I wasn’t convinced by Bernstein Vienna either. Blomstedt was my “ah, so THAT’s how it goes” moment in the second symphony, just as he was in the Eroica.)

Wow! Blomstedt is the one I have.

You mentioned Neeme Jarvi. How would you rate his cycle with the Gothenburg SO? I have their collection of tone poems and find it decent but not particularly inspiring. And Bernstein’s VPO remake of Sym.1 is really something special. NOT slow and ponderous like the 2nd but with wonderful Romantic sweep and passion. Great sound too.

You have an overflow room. I have an overflow cabinet. I intend to keep it that way.

Hi Dave, what’s your opinion on the Karajan/Kamu set?

David: so you were also at Tanglewood in 1988 in the Shed to hear Leonard Bernstein's unconducted Haydn 1988 finale? :-) That was amazing! Really enjoyed this - my first of your RU-vid talks.

Mr Hurwitz, are you aware that in the Fourth Symphony of your "best of best" cycle of Sibelius under Blomstedt, the solo cellist spoils things (for me anyway) by his loud sniff/intake of breath before he comes in?....and not just once.

are you familiar with the complete Sibelius symphonies conducted by Adrian Leaper in the early days of Naxos? He did some fine work with less well known orchestras on different labels.

Because I happen to own the set, I was hoping that you might make a comment or two about the old Adrian Leaper contribution with the Slovak Philharmonic (Naxos). I enjoy it, so I guess I didn't exactly waste my money, but I would value your opinion.

I saw a Mehta masterclass where he made exactly the point about the best conducting is no conducting and demonstrates the orchestra knew the Rite better than than the young conductor

The only full cycle I own is the Maazel. I was never a fan, but his Sibelius is great.

Excellent review, thank you, David. And Happy Jean Sibelius & Finnish Music Day today 8.12. for everybody :) On the home audio sofa: Some Sibelius Solo Piano Works played by Marita Viitasalo (Finlandia Records, now Warner) , to start with the celebration.

Thank you for the great review. I will try the Blomstedt and Bernstein cycles. I wonder what do you think about the Simon Rattle and Berliner Philarmoniker cycle.

The Berglund is my very favorite of these and I got it for a song back in the day. I don’t think anyone sympathizes with refined yet soaring Sibelian strings better. I will admit this video almost makes me want to run out and buy Noddy’s take on Melodiya. Boisterous brass slicing through my brain would be a welcome antidote to some of these cycles; Sibelius can turn into a somnolent snooze fest easily under the wrong baton. Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately), the online prices for the Rozhdestvensky cycle generally appear to be a massive ripoff.

My vote is Lorin Maazel and the Wiener Philharmoniker. Just bought and listened to Blomstedt and San Francisco. When comparing the two cycles, the WP's brass , wind wood, and string sections are very cohesive and exuberant where they need be. They crescendo where there supposed to and are quiet where there suppose to. It all seems in place. The SF and Blomstedt set just seems sluggish and unexciting in places. I know you said the WP's No. 5 pace is too fast. But its fast where it need be compared to SF. SF is too slow in places. It reminds me of Maazel with Pittsburgh, it just lies there like a dead fish you caught an hour ago and left at the bottom of your boat. In conclusion, I think WP has just better players than SF and it shows in the performance and recording. Sonics: I have the older and the newly remastered set of Maazel with the WP. The remastered set sonics are better and bridge the gap with the digital Blomstedt recording. But, the older set is pretty damn good considering it was recorded in the 60's. I have been listening to and collecting classical music for over 20 years. You tend to learn some things after awhile. I played the guitar while growing up and know the basics of music. I don't play anymore because I have a real job. So, I am aware that I know a thing or two. But for the record--after listening to your reviews, I acquired some of your suggestions because YOU KNOW GREAT PERFORMANCES AND RECORDINGS AND TRUELY KNOW YOUR MUSIC!

Already I have Berglund/EMI and Bernstein/Columbia but now I see I must add Segerstam. $igh!

What happened to Neme Jarvi's cycle of the entire Sibelius orchestral works?

I did ask you about the Sakari Iceland Cycle but I note that you don't think much of the first two symphonies, so I think I'll give it a miss.

I’m a bit surprised a review like this didn’t include the Jarvi/Gothenburg?

One culprit is also that you really get too much glued to the first recordings you listened. So, later recordings are usually experienced as worse if they sound different.

Gibson is a musical Anthony Collins? To paraphrase Beecham, who famously described Karajan as "a musical SIr Malcolm Sargent", a priceless put-down which manages to insult both conductors equally.

My favorite had been Segerstam with Helsinki. I recently bought the Paavo Jarvi with L'Orchestre de Paris and was completely surprised and pleased. The recordings of 1 and 2 are romantic and dramatic and just knocked my socks off. The later symphonies are really well played, too.

Dave!!! Your comments on the composers are even more valuable than the reviews, which are themselves an education....”tone poems” like symphonies. Soviet brass is “lacerating”, not “assiduous “-wrong word...Your work is a treasure!

Pity Eugene Ormandy 's integrity as a musician, curiously led him to not record the Sibelius Third Symphony Nor the 6th. He claimed and I believe him having chatted about it with him that they were " enigmas to him." Since David's very cogent contention is that conductors who do the first two well often find the remaining five bedeviling because of their diversity. Eugene ormandy's performances of number 2, 4 and 7 (esp LIVE) make one truly lament one can almost be angry with him that he cheated us of a great sibelius cycle

An entertaining analysis. You're tough on Collins. His mono cycle, from the 1950s, may have been the only one in its time. He made sense of #3, delineating a great work. He never expected to be put up against a thousand versions 70 years into the future. About the first two symphonies: You seem to favor the majority view: that they must be romantic. I think Brahms composed Brahms better, which is why I dislike Barbirolli and other ultra-romantic views of 1 and 2. I like a bit more "icy Northern quality" in all the symphonies. Thanks for articulating why I prefer the Vanska Lahti set to the later one. Too bad Szell didn't do them all! In concert I heard a talented young conductor do #2. He got it all but those pauses in the second movement. Before that I hadn't realized how difficult those are to bring off.

Mark Elder's great live recordings of Sibelius cycle is missing in this review.

The Collins set is very fast. I got it from a free download. The playing is a little rough. However, IMO, it is not as bad as Dave says it is, especially when it costs nothing. Back in those days, just about everything was played faster. Maybe the musicians needed some good scotch and were in a hurry.

LOL - kudos to Pipo!

I agree with the later Bernstein recordings with the Vienna Phil. - not as successful as the first set. However, No. 1 is terrific.

I like Segerstam's cycle. But he occasionally has the basses play an octave lower than written in spots. That's a wee bit of cheating, don't you think?

I am guessing that the not mentioned Simon Rattle cycle (with the City of Birmingham SO) is neither in the worst nor the best group, but in between.

Should Svetlanov have done Sibelius and Rozhdestvensky have done Mahler? Maybe the recording assignments were wrong.