Nice piece of kit, at $2700.00 it's far beyond my budget, and no, did not see them listed below that price within about ten different vendors. I'll just have to muddle along with a separate unit from my binocs and maybe just upgrade my rifle and optics while still beating that price.
Zero percent chance that thing calculates for the Coriolis effect. Not even the longest shot ever made in the world took that into effect. He said so himself.
Hi Ron, I have been wanting to get my hands on a good beginner level camera for wildlife and landscape photography. I was just curious if you had any recommendations. I'm not trying to do it professionally, I'm just doing it for fun. I went to Yellowstone back in September and the pictures I took with my phone camera were so grainy. The bison looked like black blobs from only fifty yards away. I'm going to Great Smoky Mountains National Park in September of this year and I don't want to make the same mistake.
I’m not knocking the binoculars but you better be able to read the wind. Reading the wind at distance is more important to making the shot than the Coriolis effect.
At the price of a pair of range finding binoculars, I could buy the gas needed to get to my favorite hunting spot for the whole season, or 2 or 3 seasons to go 'hunting'. If I wanted to go 'shooting' I'd stop by the local shooting range! To each his own.
@@EatingElk Leica, Swarovski and Zeiss just to name a few with with hundreds of years experience with top tier glass is superior....best is a very strong statement when comparing it to this three Juggernauts.
Seems overcomplicated! What, no image stabilization? For Snipers? Heck, just use the new Burris Eliminator 5! Otherwise, for normal hunting, I sight my 300 Weatherby, 300 RUM, 28 Nosler for a 300-yard bullseye. Then, I know my drops out to as far as I care to shoot. I'm pretty much good to 400 without thinking. There is no need to waste time ranging. Aim and squeeze trigger. Unless one lacks experience to judge 400 yards? I would think, most shots beyond 300 yards, one would have plenty time to range, then shoot? Now, if you're shooting 1,000 yards... sniping at game, we'll then, I guess these binoculars would be great! Like I said, the Eliminator 5 sounds interesting for sure!
At $2700, this piece of equipment is not worth it. Buy a range finding scope and save the money. Burris makes one that I use and love in the west at a fraction of the cost.
I've nothing truly relative or new to say about this video concerning the new Revic binos, except that it certainly would be a nice to have and all though luxury is a sin, knowledge of modern technology that aids in the release of the everyday stresses of life of mankind by participating in a sporting activity has to be beneficial somewhere down the road. It's just to bad that pollution is a byproduct of it's creation. But without pollution we would still be herding Animals off of cliffs for sustinance or putting ourselves in great danger by killing formidable animals at close range with rocks spears , knives or even the popular but still dangerous activity of bow hunting. That is technology has been extremely helpful to mankind at getting formidable animals from the wilderness, (the formidable animals natural habitat) to the cutting board, by lowering the possible danger to the health or lives of humans. Great video and product....
🙋🏼♀️ sir! Hmm 🤭 this may sound kinda funny to you but I'm just gonna ask: - I play Cod mobile? And there's this type of weapons? Called Marksman? And I sort of kinda confused them with sniper rifles? But like I'm having troubles like finding like the right scope? And like the sight? Cuz well dunno how on real life works? But like in cod mobile u have kinda like this hipfire option? And is kinda good. I discovered recently that aiming towards the head gives u better kills regardless? 🤔 But I wish I knew more about scopes? 😒 I mean I'm not a looser? 🤭 I'm not that bad at cod mobile but I also like wanna be realistic about my scope options like with sniper rifle and Marksman stuff? 🤗 Well... Hope u can help. I'll search my weapons and scope's anyways. I like the -Rytek -SVD -Sks -M21? And the ARTIC.50 with thermal stuff 😎 so cool. But u get those on BR like airdrops? 🙄 Hardly get to be like super awesome and get kills with that one 🤭🤭🤭🤭. Ok. Thanx! 🤗🤗🤗
I don't purchase or eat Wagyu beef because I won't pay that much for something thats going to turn into a turd in a few hours. Now yall are doing that to venison.
Pair to the phone... enough said... cue sad trombone... The connection is Bluetooth, Bluetooth is awful it's always been awful ask 5 guys in a submersible how much they love Bluetooth. This devices has tons of cool features, but with Bluetooth there will be devices that work and some that don't, so it's possible to need a new phone or tablet or the connection just will for no reason just never work even though the device did work, but now it doesn't. But it does work... see lab radar in this industry... no it wont it would take thousands of use cases, Anker who sells millions of earbuds yearly if not monthly often hits in the low 4s rating on average because of "compatibility issues". Oh yeah so some company 100s of times smaller is going to hit on it and have zero issues. I'm sure they are great glass, sounds like functionally with range finding and if they work in 6 out of 10 planned scenarios, they will work just amazing, but I would also bet there is a smashed pair out in the wilderness during testing because it was giving garbage data (for no explainable reason and if there wassn't there will be, shortly after release). How is the firmware on the binos updated? Through Bluetooth? Yeah nothing has ever been bricked at multiple times the rate any other transfer method has ever experienced. the binos in many way will likely be great, but the software is likely to be a disaster or lab radar levels of livable annoyance, but if there was anything else "you would jump ship so fast."
The beginning premise was simplify the shot. This complicated that premise. Promoted by Gunwerks because they promote irresponsible shots at game animals that deserve more respect than being sniped from half a mile away.
Well, the Earth is rotating, which is why we have those cool things called daytime and nighttime, but yes, it’s realistically not rotating enough to truly make a difference on shots.
🕵️♂️ If you can judge how far away that the animal is, then you are either too far away to shoot or you aren't "Competent Enough" to make the shot! 👨⚖
🧐 My State has Already Outlawed Many of these "Electronic Aids", so you had better be familiar with a States Regulations/Laws that you are hunting in before you go and use such devices! 👮♂️🚔
@@prone_wolf8871 The only thing missing from this, as presented, is factoring the wind. Then it could "pair" with your smart scope, which would adjust the crosshairs for you. Why not have electronic trigger control so that when the scope and/or binocular-range finder decided the rifle was on target, the rifle would fire. Why even go out in the field at all? The gun could be mounted on a motorized pedestal which would detect and track the animal. The "hunter" could be snug back at the lodge (or, still at home for that matter), watching a computer screen. He, or his guide, would authorize the shot and the machine would do the rest.
First, a nit that has nothing to do with my actual opinion. What is happening at 5:32? How is that image related to the description? Second, am I the only Luddite here who thinks this is a complete abomination? 2:04 "They've really promoted that long-range hunting trend...", as though that is a good thing. 2:14 "...that calculates your ballistic solution for you...", as though that were a good thing. 2:21 "...you pair it with your phone." Remember the part where he bragged about not having to carry another piece of gear? The only thing missing from this, as presented, is factoring the wind. Then it could "pair" with your smart scope, which would adjust the crosshairs for you. Why not have electronic trigger control so that when the scope and/or binocular-range finder decided the rifle was on target, the rifle would fire. Why even go out in the field at all? The gun could be mounted on a motorized pedestal which would detect and track the animal. The "hunter" could be snug back at the lodge (or, still at home for that matter), watching a computer screen. He, or his guide, would authorize the shot and the machine would do the rest.