I help a guy use one of these machines occasionally. Actually the barrel stays locked down in the same position all the time. There is a indexing feature that moves the cutting rod to the exact next place where a groove will be. The idea is not to cut each groove in its entirety at once but to initially establish each groove and slowly deepen each one. It usually takes around 300 or more for each groove. It is imperative to count the strokes so all grooves will be close to equal. When the cutter stops cutting you lift it out of its groove and put a paper shim under it to deepen the cut. When the paper shim is installed the first pull stroke is sort of hard to get started. We use crisco or lard for cutting oil as the chips stick to it good.
I like this machine. I have pictures of the orignal rifling machine ( looks like your machine) used to make the first 1856 rifled muskets in Conneticut.
I made a shorter version to rifle a 10 inch octagonal pistol barrel of .50 caliber. The bore circumference is 1.5 inches. My cutting bit(made from the edge of an old file) was just a couple thousandths under 1/8 inch wide so I could only cut six grooves (3/4 inch or one half of the bore surface area). I cut one groove at a time and adjusted the bit on every pull. Five or six cuts got the .010 groove depth I wanted.
8 grooves .008"-.010" deep, ea. cut is shimed up with paper (.001 @ the smallest paper increment) with ea. cut having 1-2 wind or pressure cuts. How would this add up to "several thousand cuts"? I have rifled many barrels. I would like to see his math.
Or the guy behind the camera, there several thousand strokes. 8 grooves say a hundred strokes each. Can't these guys add up. I believe what you said would be closer to the mark.
@@diegosuarez1265 This rifling bench is homemade. You should be able to find a booklet on the internet on home made riflling machines. Thanks for watching.
There is a gunsmith in Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia who demonstrates how they made muzzle loaders and barrels and rifling with this same set up. IT IS NOT CHEAP to get a rifle made this way
It would not be cheap. You need to understand these weapons are handmande, the guy has to work from pieces of metal and work some 300 hours into having an finished gun. If you just want to shoot an relatively accurate replica you are better of getting an pedersoli.
Drill it out a bit bigger than the bore, thread it and use a threaded breach plug. You make it bigger so that it fully seals the end and doesn’t leave the threads exposed to the bore / explosion
This is an example of an old design. Yes, that could make it easier and faster, but it'd lose the actual purpose of this one. Tradition and simplicity. I mean, they could just go and use a CNC machine to do this instead and it'd be incredibly easier. But that's just not the point.
Because it would need too much force to pull and also too much force to force the tool into it's rotational movement. Such long rod that holds the tool can not withstand too much torque force without give in. It acts like a spring then.
No one seems to know how to make proper rifling heads. Imagine that this poor guy needs to make several thousands of passers to get he his rifling done. No wonder the Swedish gov. carried out industrial espionage to gain acess of my rifling technology. The Indian gov. is going to make them pay for that.