RICH Intel on China's Fujian Carrier: Design, Flight Deck & Sea Trial 

Thank Daniel Duggan

However in this case, the chinese are trying to figure out if it's a ship...

no, the "shakedown cruise" is the 1st real world deployment of a carrier in commision; this was the 1st CV-18 sea trial.

Thanks!

Merci beaucoup !

Your military is a fraud

Hahahaha that's right

Glimpse of the future perhaps. Unmanned aircraft would be the majority of the load out in 10-20 years.

Yeahh it call trials for a reason dude.US carrier first launched is trolly bro..

it will never launch a jet plane...systems are to weak..

@@williamblomster2387 care to wager actual money ( I will take crypto or gold if you prefer that route) on it? I bet that Fujian will launch at least 1 aircraft before the ship is scrapped. Never is a very long time.

Yea, nice CGI

China needs to throw her weight around. This carrier isn’t designed for use against Taiwan or Japan, but to enforce its interests in Africa. In a shooting war with the US this carrier will need to be under a shore-based air umbrella and anti-aircraft missiles. Because it will be outnumbered 5-1 by larger carriers with decades of combat experience.

Looks like a Russian carrier ,no smoke. Another pos made to look like ours. Thanks Clinton for selling us out.

​@@CorePathway用你的大嘴巴吗?

給我狠狠踢美國佬的屁股！😂

Have you recovered the body of your dead dictator ?

From America fu

伊朗，挺住。Love from China, Bro

​@@worldatpeace8979美国🐶又跑出来乱咬人了

Thanks man!

Many thanks!

I saw this story but feel like it never had any evidence.

you mean 076LHD？

@@jinz948 There satelite image of it being build in jiangsu dayang shipyard. along with 2 Catamaran "Drone Mothership" I have seen the photo, which quite weird. its like LHD but cut in half ?!?

​@@user-ni9mj1km5jno not a LHD

Feelipins nott evun afreit. Dhey ar williing becom cannan foddurs for Amerikka an winniing waar evedyday laik ukrein

Yes, I think it is high time the Chinese move away from Russian design. Since they can design huge ship there is no reason why they will struggle to design newer aircraft carrier. Maybe the new design and testing took longer than desired hence this Fujian is a fusion of both Russians and Chinese design.

Don’t underestimate the power of cow dung!

China is competing with the USA not India.

估計印度耍破防了

I see no waves in this clip, so untill there are similar conditions you can't compare.

Have you seen the HMS Queen Elizabeth? It couldn't even move to make waves. Kept leaking.

Ship parts already in construction, so minimising changes required. There's ~half year pause to refit, modification be done. There must ne a lot of internal structure changes between 2 different catapult

​@@james_l4337i'ld imagine emals to b less bulky internally.

@@james_l4337it would have been more than half a year of delay if they make more design changes. Not just due to parts already been manufactured. The hull length would have to change to accommodate the longer catapult while maintaining relative position with elevator. that impacts the weight balance, hull strength, water flow around the hull, and possibly power requirements. All of that would have to be recalculated and verified.

@orzdxy Source ? Or is this just a personal theory ?

@@xsu-is7vqchanging the entire front nose structure is a 1/4 ship. Building another 1/4 mean ship was a lose lose design from get start. So everyone is correct as minimal chnage as is possible Limiting only to replacing steam catapult to EMALS Although lot more expense then do it right 1st time It release lot more room internal for other use. Also a carrier PLAN had to live with for 40 or more years. It's 20 million to fill up its tank! It will have been better to cater for EMALS in 1st place, as that is the future that's how overtaking can happen. Steam catapult has inherently all points not equal to EMALS, same with launching planes with earlier catapult (not steam) that also isn't a viable option for plane that's now 10 to 40+ tons Redeemable fact of higher up that EMALS, is put on shio 😊

Thanks!

Exactly!!!...They learn from everything..No experience is wasted...😀👍

Exactly. China only builds one of each class as a development platform. Fujian is a Type 003. There are strong rumors that the Type 004 will have 4 EMALS cats, and quite possibly nuclear propulsion. I personally expect that will also be a development platform, as the Chinese are smart enough to avoid a Ford-type disaster. I expect the Type 005 will become the first Chinese Fleet Carrier. And they will build the heck out of them when that time comes.

@@georgemorris9616well, the only new technology for a nuclear powered 004 would be just the propulsion system. If that is tested on a training ship, then nothing would be new. I predict the next design would be the standard model, followed by several hulls in rapid succession with only minor changes between them.

@@xsu-is7vq My guess is that this is indeed that path. The Chines are known to be working on a nuclear power plant of a size capable of meeting the needs of a carrier and I assume that their carrier tech is likely on par with US other than the nuclear plant.

@@georgemorris9616 hunk of junk...will never carry aircraft

Yes the electro optical turrets, aka R2D2

You have a wisdom that is not common among RU-vid commentors. The common refrain is that "it isn't as good as ours" and the realty is that it doesn't have to be. It only has to be good enough to do what China wants to do. What China really wants to do is re-unite Taiwan, and since the Taiwanese don't actually have an aircraft carrier, it would seem that the Chinese carrier will be better than no carrier.

Hahahahaha

by taking the risk of using electric catapult, china is the second in the world to have the super carrier, the downside is you can not change the hull of the ship that much in the process of building. that makes some uncomfortable feature you can see in this video. it can always bea choice to have a old but perfect ship or a new but not perfect ship. before WW I, German navy takes the old ship, but royal navy get the dreadnought, i am Chinese so i trust the choice taken by navy, or i have to trust in it, at war the choice may decide at the end and future of the world, you can only trust in victory of your navy and your nation. 004 may not count that much because final Taiwan trait crisis may be very soon. if you win the war, even you are actually building shit, the shit it self will be golden shit that changes the world, maybe thats why navy choose to take the risk, navy want an quick solution, bring in the victory, after the war, what ever win or lose no one will care how many aircraft carrier you have got, a defeated nation with 100 carriers can never match a winner nation with a 1000 ton frigate

It's true. You are right I think.

There is ALWAYS a submarine with a carrier

@@amunra5330 Source ? Or just a personal theory ?

@@RectalRooter amunra is quite correct. Any USN carrier task force at sea will be accompanied by at least one Los Angeles class attack boat. More often than not the task force will be trailed by a Russian attack sub. It is like this everywhere, for any modern Navy.

@@johnbuckles1344 So you guys are saying China's culture can only copy others and is not able to be imaginative / foreword thinking in it's procedures and techniques ?

@@RectalRooter What the hell kind of misinterpretation is that? This isn't about denigrating the Chinese Navy, it is just a basic tactical arrangement. The Chinese would be stupid to not do the same thing, why would you leave your surface ship vulnerable to submarine attack? Do you have even the slightest knowledge of naval history or tactics?

the us lacks the spine to be smart like that

OMG OMG hurry and Call Xi about your -- Not very sounding conspiracy theory -- theory.. Your call will save China from Intergalactic aliens sinking the ship

@@chronicandironic8701 Have you been call a Rotard a lot during your life ?

印度航母“维克拉玛蒂亚”号 是从苏联1143型航母改装而来的 中国也有一艘 不过我们不屑在这个平台上改装，而是把它变成供人参观的航母公园

China: stealing exclusive economic zones and building fake islands in the west philippine sea stirring trouble in asia and the world

??? How is China Powering ?

Can you add more capslock ?

No innovation

@@isaacasunciongallardo9781 No innovation needed. Just has to be good enough to perform the mission, and I would say that they have that down pretty well.

The answer to your question is yes.

@@jaydee6268 glad to hear

The Fujian ship cost about $7 billion to build

It's called PLAN bro

The existing configuration he said has to do with continuing familiar operations with the existing carriers China already has. Which frighteningly might also mean China doesn't want to waste time with all new processes yet because this carrier might be needed soon because war is near. What you mentioned about maximizing the potential of a new carrier config might be reserved for the next upcoming nuclear carriers.

I am quite sure that no US aircraft carrier leaves port without being observed by China and Russia. Everyone watches everyone. I don't see why that is particularly amusing.

Later

Axis of evil 😂You are missing 🇰🇵,fatty Kim is upset at you😅

American people are ruled by an alzheimer patient,which is a bad sign.

it's not meant to be

U r just too poor to get access to Chinese design, maybe.

Everyone stand for the American National Anthem .. Any other countries want to get in on this ?? 😀

Long Live the Romulan Empire

Cope

Stop crying bud

it's not meant for global deployment though. So why waste money on a nuclear powertrain

but why would you change something that works? Carriers have been looking this way for a reason. So making it worse just to look different isn't smart

India is a true THIRD WORLD COUNTRY compared to China ..India only survives because of Western help.

Cry hard baby😂

@@alinux09 laughing hard my little pink wumao chihuahua warrior keyboard wanker. Just stay within your Great Wall of infamy.

You can rest assured that the Fujian will sink after the Ford.

Taiwan 2 China's 2 Systems!💪

Is that H-Inglish?

Form follows function. Everyone copies everyone else. The British invented the angled flight deck.

At the hull length it has, I would expect that it will sail as well as a US carrier on rough seas. I was on the Forrestal in a bad storm, and the arc of the round-down was 12 feet, which is too dangerous to recover aircraft, so if you can't recover an aircraft, you can't launch an aircraft, so everyone is just going for a ride.

你有没有想过一个问题，水里的鱼为什么都长的一摸一样？因为他们的外形最符合流体力学。

@@hi-jony hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Helicopters aren’t fish, hi-jony. I agree, the Blackhawk is a beautiful helicopter

@@danielmartin7838 Don't be to hard on @hi-jony He can only Parrot what other people say.

Each lift can carry two planes folded. The jettison ramp handily serves as a mid-point delineation

SFA的同志辛苦了

They won't be able to get close enough...India is a third World country compared to China. .

我说布拉莫斯是垃圾你信不？1990年代的垃圾技术😂😂😂

That missile the Indians launched, they didn't even know where it was headed. Why do you guys always step out and make a spectacle of yourselves? The Brahmos missile, what a dud, don't you guys have a clue?

I would like to see how US carriers hold up against hypersonic missiles 😊

Bro actually thinks BRAHMOS is something.

While junk like u surf in the comments...😂