Robert Pattinson on Playing an Assertive, Fearless Character in 'Good Time' | Close Up With THR 

Fedzi Yeah. They should be fired.

Hahahahaha

Probably to make money from ticket sales or something

Yellow Rice this is the best thing 🤣🤣🤣

true

He’ll be calling Robert, Armie in no time lol hahah but what if? Lol love them both

LOOOOOL he doeeeeeesssssss

That didn't age well did it

Sensitive and insecure is like every actor ever

I think there's a difference between sensitive and insecure, and one is mistaken for the other. He's actually quite confident and secure. It takes a strong person to appear vulnerable and humble. You don't will a film like Good Time into existence if you're insecure. He's the one who contacted the directors, he's the one who inspired them to write Good Time and he's the one who carries the film on his shoulders. He's modest, not insecure. Many actors would appear arrogant but Rob remains down to earth. He's also just plain shy, which is also not insecure.

its because he's a cancer rising.

Yo you can totally tell he's insecure. I bet it's because he did Twilight and those other movies that bombed miserably. This is his only good movie. Legit. So he knows he has to prove himself.

He's not insecure because he did Twilight. That franchise earned over a billion dollars, it was a huge success and left him set for life financially. None of his films have "bombed miserably." He's made a series of low budget indies that were never meant to be commercial movies. As a matter of fact, his last 7 films have all been critically successful, and that's what he cares about. His films usually premiere at Cannes (Good Time, The Rover, Maps to the Stars, Cosmopolis) and they've all been excellent films. It's not his fault that the general public wants to see comic books movies. He's making films that will stand the test of time when everyone has forgotten IronMan2.

that's exactly what I thought, the best thing about the roundtable was that the artists are among their peers and can talk more-or-less as equals, among people who do the same thing as them, and not perform the whole time, not be "on". the audience ruins the whole thing.

damn...lol

Leda Gocheva This doesn't seem to be one the regular roundtables.

forallyouknow if they have another movie with armie and rob in the lead, i'd pay my soul to watch it

Batman looking at Batman

he is like why did you take my role!!! PS cant wait for matt reeves batman

khannak_ lol he was probably thinking “ you bastard, you took my role”

He's literally just listening

yooo I never clicked until then!

MrGMovieReviews me too 🤗

Incredible movie that no one will see. No stupor heroes.

It's his best asset! He's a chameleon -- a trait worth its weight in gold for an actor.

this is by far the most accurate robert pattinson ddescription i have ever read

girl 💀

Look there's Harley too :D

lost droid It was done in the past--the combination of actors and actresses, as well as the audience, look it up.

Please stop with those stupid nicknames. His name is Robert Pattinson.

I wish people would stop dragging Stewart into every Pattinson conversation. They have no connection, they aren't even friends any more, they don't even speak. And the reality is, his career has left hers in the dust. He's in the Oscar conversation, he's doing these roundtables, he's on every "Best of 2017" list and she isn't. His last 6 films have been critical successes and 4 of her last 7 have been flops with critics and at the box office. He has 5 films in the pipeline with respected directors like Claire Denis, Ciro Guerra, David Michod, Joanna Hogg, etc. and she has nothing on the horizon. She's not attached to any new films and her last 3 unreleased films have been with no name hack directors. Two low budget indies and one disaster movie. So their careers are not taking the same path and they have nothing to do with each other.

Yeah, but they aren't both making brave choices in their career (she's taking whatever she's offered, like cheap disaster movies) and he's working with some of the most respected directors in the film industry. I'm tired of seeing people drag her into the conversation about how great his career is when they aren't informed on how badly her career is going. There is no comparison. She doesn't belong in the conversation. They have no professional or personal connection. You know that Anna Kendrick was also in the 5 Twilight movies-- and her career is going fantastic. If you want to drag up someone from Twilight for a comparison, try Kendrick. She's fronted one of the most popular franchises in history, Pitch Perfect, and she's had an Oscar nomination and a SAG nom, things Stewart never has. And I don't drink coke, it's very unhealthy. I will have a cup of tea however, and meditate on how the Twilight franchise ended in 2012 and it's so time for people to move on.

Мария Юдинцева but people don't hate him for that.

Him and Tom Hardy are the only two actors that I know that completely immerse themselves in their characters when playing a role.

Get rid of the audience creepy , where is Lacey ? The only reason I bought subscription to THR, was her excellent interviewing style. This guy sucks but is barely better then the previous english dousche bag that has recently been doing the roundtables. Bring back the true brains and talent for these roundtables. THR WAKE UP the roundtables are the ONLY thing that makes you dfferent and better then the dozens of entertainment media. Get a grip fix things now . As previous comments have said fix the screw up.

I want to see Phantom Thread as well, but I saw CMBYN and I was not as impressed as the critics have been. It's a good movie but it's not great, and Chalamet can't hold a candle to Pattinson in Good Time. Pattinson's role required more than riding a bike and swimming in pools while staring at Armie Hammer. Nothing against Chalamet, but there's way too much hype over his performance this year.

H. Madison Not trying to sound like a douche, but I have also seen CMBYN, & I would have to agree with your assessment of Chalamet's performance. Don't get me wrong, he does a wonderfully competent job of inhabiting that character, but the outright adulation, the thunderous hyperbole surrounding Chalamet in that film is imho largely for political reasons; reasons I am sympathetic toward, but ultimately reasons that should not (at least in my opinion) be a part of any self respecting critics criteria for quality. The movie Good Time made me forget who Robert Pattinson was for an hour and a half. Good Time is or at least as I see it, the high point of a culmination of some surprising turns for Pattinson in more art house fair such as Cronenberg's Cosmopolis, Michod's TheRover, and now here collaborating with the Safdie's I felt I'd watch an arch or a transformation of sorts where at the end of said arch I walked out of the theater knowing I had just witnessed the arrival of one of the grestest actors of his generation the transformative arch was complete, & I was fucking floored! Chalamet on the other hand did great in a role that suited him. Anyways, I see Chalamet or Oldman taking it, & out of those two I sincerely hope Oldman finally gets some awards love the guy's a beast of an actor!

We're on the same page. I like Chalamet and he did a good job (he's also friends with Pattinson, I wish them both the best). Good Time just asked so much more of Pattinson and he delivered a thousand percent. The Oscars and awards hype isn't fair. CMBYN is like a luxurious travelogue--it's easy to watch, where Good Time is a rough ride, grimy, visceral and seedy. The critics have also embraced it, but they don't celebrate it in the way they hype the "pretty" movie. It's annoying. I think it might be between Oldman and DDL, and that's because of their ages and filmography, not the performances this year.

Shanoriya Robinson just silent shifting meat bags staring at them