Тёмный

Roger Stritmatter - Leveraging the Shakespeare Allusion Book 

Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship
Подписаться 4,8 тыс.
Просмотров 16 тыс.
50% 1

"The New Shakespeare Allusion Book" is a forthcoming, collaboratively prepared reference book of over 700 pages, co-edited by Alexander Waugh and Roger Stritmatter. Canvassing the critical reception, in both orthodox and post-Stratfordian traditions, of more than 182 allusions to Shakespeare or Shakespeare plays from 1584 to 1786, the work not only summarizes the history of each allusion in the secondary literature, but comprehensively and carefully contextualizes each allusion to reach a surprising conclusion:
The vast majority of these allusions exhibit clear evidence for their authors’ awareness that the Shakespeare works were written under a pseudonym.
And a large number of these allusions, using early modern tactics of literal indirection, even reveal a clear understanding that the real author of the works was Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. No comparable resource, bringing the Oxfordian case to an academic as well as a popular readership on strictly scholarly terms, is currently available. The presentation will cover some highlights from the forthcoming allusion book and then facilitate discussion on how the SOF and other post-Stratfordian groups can make use of the allusion book in our public education projects.
This talk was presented on October 15, 2017, at the SOF Annual Conference in Chicago.
Roger Stritmatter, Ph.D., is Professor of Humanities and Literature at Coppin State University (Baltimore) and a member of the Shakespeare Oxford Society (SOS) since 1990. He was a founding member of the Shakespeare Fellowship (2001-13), which merged with the SOS to form the SOF in 2013. In 2009, with Gary Goldstein, he created Brief Chronicles: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Authorship Studies, serving as general editor (2009-16). The 2015 third edition of James A. Warren's "Index to Oxfordian Publications" identifies 105 articles by him between 1990 and 2014, many in orthodox academic journals including Shakespeare Yearbook, Review of English Studies, Notes and Queries, Cahiers Elisabethains, and Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review. He is co-author, with Lynne Kositsky, of "On the Date, Sources, and Design of Shakespeare’s The Tempest" (McFarland 2013). He has appeared in two authorship documentaries, Last Will. & Testament (2012) and Nothing Is Truer Than Truth (2018).
For more on the Shakespeare Authorship Question, visit ShakespeareOxfordFellowship.org.

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

 

1 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 10   
@michaelpisapia
@michaelpisapia 4 года назад
Watch this video! Dr. Stritmatter is incisive - his manner and presentation are excellent. The content is extremely well researched and set out in an interesting and clear way- he makes it look easy. Thank you for this great post-Stratfordian work.
@MaHa-um5sv
@MaHa-um5sv 6 месяцев назад
I am learning so much!
@beaulah_califa9867
@beaulah_califa9867 2 года назад
1:05:00 Ben Jonson's preferred book re cryptography of literary works
@Short-Cipher
@Short-Cipher 3 года назад
Very impressive 👏.
@rooruffneck
@rooruffneck 5 лет назад
I'd love to know what the ratio of anonymous to non-anonymous plays was all through the 90s. Hard to know when something is an anomaly in these contexts.
@rstritmatter
@rstritmatter 5 лет назад
Good question. Plays were mostly anonymous until after 1598-- but "Shakespeare" is the big transition, in 1598, preceded by Lyly's Endymion in 1597. After that, names frequently start appearing on play quartos.
@joecurran2811
@joecurran2811 4 месяца назад
​@@rstritmatterDid this book ever come out?
@RalphEllis
@RalphEllis 3 года назад
Regards writing on many levels, this was common in ancient manuscripts. As Jesus said to his disciples: “He said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.”. Math 13:11. And the text of the Talmud is even more opaque…. Ralph
@heartofjesusdj
@heartofjesusdj 3 месяца назад
He nearly lost his job? Good grief, for what charge? There is something else behind this not wanting Shakespeare to be discovered for who he was. I believe I know what’s behind it but I won’t say. I will say that if people know the truth their eyes will be opened and the power that certain people hold r would be upended.
Далее
Bob Meyers - Was It Really William?
47:04
Просмотров 12 тыс.
#28 Christianity and Unknowing: Richard Rohr
1:11:45
Просмотров 64 тыс.
Shake-speare's TREASON
1:49:38
Просмотров 36 тыс.
Being Human | Robert Sapolsky
37:00
Просмотров 245 тыс.