Rolex Submariner No Date Comparison - 14060M vs 114060 vs 124060 (4K) 

Wonderful job, no BS, no flashy B roll, music. Just pure knowledge and true user feedback.

Lol. Love the video. Love the remarks “you buy a 14060m when you know about Rolex. When you have try all of them you can back to the submariner no date two lines”. That is me right now. Searching for that 14060m. Thank you for sharing.

The 124060 is the best Submariner in existence, but it is not perfect. I find it a bit too large. My ideal Submariner would be the 124060 specs (movement, glidelock, ceramic bezel, chromolight etc), with the case demenions of the 14060M. Hopefully they do a 39mm Submariner for the 134060 coming out in 2030.

Great historical comparison here! I have the new 41mm Sub and it certainly still feels a little square and boxy. I think in isolation, separated from the older models, the newer one can still be enjoyable though. The 14060M is the absolute beauty but I just couldn't love the older bracelets. Everything else about that watch is fantastic. Thank you for this demonstration.

“This is the watch you end up buying once you have been through the whole Rolex line-up” sums me up! I’ve owned almost every Rolex model and this is the quintessential Rolex for me! As you say, the 14060M is the last of the Submariner line with vintage DNA! This is the watch to own when you have nothing to prove since you have already owned the line-up!

Good choice my friend. I prefer the Sea Dweller 16600 overall. It’s perfect.

Honestly who at rolex thought it would be a good idea to in make the clasp bigger; and the dial too for that matter. All that was needed was to go back to the 14060m dimensions and make the bezel ceramic, maybe add a glide lock (unless that is the reason for the bigger clasp, then I'd say unnecessary).

Great video bro, I just got my 14060m after turn down 124060 from AD. I got a late production random serial number 4 liners… after turn down few bad conditioned 2 liners, flat topped 4. I still trying to find a best solution for 14060m bracelet sizing (mine is about 6’5 inches)

"I don't look at my watch to tell time.."

00:00:22 As a german I love how you are imitating the german accent. This is exactly the way many people speak 😄 I like the 114060 most, as it has the ceramic bezel and a high quality clasp, which is slimmer than the new ones. I also owned the 124060 but sold it because of the fat strap and clasp.

I'm not sure about the new one. It appears that, rather than go back to thinner lugs and dump the maxi case, they simply upped the size of the watch/bezel and gave it a wider bracelet. Result - the lugs looks smaller. I'm not sure, however, that making the face of the watch bigger was the right way of going about it and yes, the face does look bigger compared to the outgoing 40mm

At 4:44 my man morphed into a G for a sec

Omg what have Rolex done. The case on the new sub is absolutely horrendous 🤮

Had the seadweller 16600 bought the 114060 and with my large wrist this fits sooo much better and not too top heavy. All subjective I guess. All beauties

“I don’t look at my watch to tell time”- What???

Love the content, and subscribed! I was fortunate to get the call, a few days ago, and picked up the 126610LN!! Great comparison of the three models!!!

For me, the 70 hour power reserve is why I'd go for the new one

The NEW sub looks ugly with oversize bracelet and clasp.

You don't look at your watch to tell time? Why even have a watch? Get yourself a pretty bracelet 😅

Completely disagree with your opinion, still enjoyed the video. Thank you very much, very informative.

124060 is the king 👑 of the wrist

Good review but I would avoid using bad words as it adds nothing to the video.

I have the latest model. However, I agree with you on your choice of which one is best.

I have the ceramic sub and pepsi. But have to admit I much prefer the aesthetic or pre ceramic. It's just a practical thing that I bought modern. Will no doubt eventually get 5 digit version

114060 is #1. Ceramic bezel, glidelock, thinner clasp. 14060M in 2nd, then 124060 last.

You can definitely see the new AR coating working on the 124060

i would choose the early version . . thanks for the vid

Just been considering some great deals on all three while shopping in Hong Kong, and agree 100% with your take. Both newer ones have a bolder/blingier look (bigger crown guards, fatter dial markings, more text, rehaut engraving) - and I can see why that will appeal to some - while the 2-liner 14060m is classic, simple, clean, yet with a great movement ... kinda like the classic Porsche 911 before it got bloated. So bought the 14060m in the end. The only feature I miss is the glide-lock.

What you said on the 14060 is so dang true! Went tru full circle of modern Rolex n now back to the 14060! 😂

Thanks 👍🏻 For me: 14060M (4 Liner) & 116600.

I bought the Kermit 41, but that is also not new. I think it was 16 or 18, but not last year. I don’t wear it, I wear the gmt, even when it’s pretty much the same, like the black submariner except the 24 hour arrow, and the closing with that sliding for diving. My perfect watch is my jaeger, not enough people know it to mug me;)

yah i don't understand why the clasps keep getting bigger as well... these big watch brands must hate the asian market and their smaller wrist sizes. Shitty because most of their business is done in those markets

came for bezel action comparison

That’s my favorite too .. flow with class , if you want more of a statement then go for an SD43.. the Ceramic ones look like every other watch out there …16610 classic has a look of it’s own .

1 its watch Video do need to swear, 2 the bigger clasp on the latest 2 models is most probably a safer and stronger clasp plus the glide lock. 3 you neglected to state the new movement gone from 48 hours to 72 hours.

I really enjoy your uploads as they are very honest and because I agree with the sentiments. I had a 14060m two line that I got brand new from an AD (£2000! Back then there were anniversary models in windows that no one wanted 🙈) and kept for 20 years. I sold it because it felt frail by today’s standards but really regret it now. I also have the 41 like you and it’s a great modern watch but I miss the one I had. The box yours came in is very different to the one I had. Maybe this box was introduced towards the end of production but I’m not sure it’s the original. Mine came with a silver anchor, a booklet about the history of the watch, paper warranty, a calendar and the box was covered in a darker green leather - the inside of the top and the inside of the bottom sides was exposed wood - the outer box was also completely different with a natural stone pattern. I think the ‘m’ meant that it was COSC certified although the dial text didn’t mention it as with the date version at the time. Keep uploading and thank you for your insights - it’s good to see someone talking about the shortcomings instead of just gushing praise. Great watches but not perfect - what is?

The new model is the best Sub to date. The proportions are perfect. 124060 over the 114060 all day long!

It's just damn stupid that Rolex went for a 21mm lug width on the 124060 🤦‍♂ Just hoping they'll correct that in the next generation or two...

Loves my 1967 5513 more for its iconic feel - modern watches are OK, but only age gives watches real iconic status. That 5513 will of course never go in the water. My go-in-the-water pieces are 4 Omegas - the neovintage sword hands SMPs, 2 in steel, 2 in titanium. Bought them years ago for about 2K apiece. Have a nice day.

Great informal style. Love it. Greetings from England. 👍🇬🇧

114060 all day over the 124060 the movement is very noisy 🤔😜

Pre ceramic looks way better to me.

For me 36mm Day Date in platinum is the best

I have to disagree with at least some of your assessment. They tapered down the lugs on the 124060, but it’s still nothing like the 14060. Neither watch does a very great job of capturing the aesthetic of the pre-ceramic Sub. Not to say that’s a bad thing by any means, they’re all great in their own way; just how it is from my point of view.

The newest version has good proportions. It’s just all too big. They needed to go smaller with everything rather that increase the size from supercase.

Fantastic video! Maybe the best out there on the no date sub.

The 904L steel has been used by Rolex since 85 and their oyster steal percentage wise is almost exactly 904L. Omega experimented with that steel in 72. So, the 14060m is 904L steel. Just wanted to clarify.

Great comparison, I love the new one but I hate that it has a 21mm lug width, it’s sad that the old one doesn’t have ceramic bezel

So I watched this again last night. I’m really torn between getting a perfect condition 5 digit ( with engraved rehaut) and the new one. Still undecided even after watching this again. Great comparison… I guess time will tell

"Basic as fuck, but really all you need". I'll quote you on that😂 Thank you for the video!

Where do you buy those genuine rolex gloves?

Simple, the date window is used when your not diving.

Why do you look at your watch then?

Informative video. Thanks.

All beautiful. P.s. great review.

ここまでやっといて接写動画がないって

Such bitchy complaints to an extent. I have the 114060... if your wrists aren't baby sized the watch fits/looks fine. There are MUCH bigger dive watches out these days. The 114060 has broader lugs and I do agree they don't look as good as the refined 14060m but that's part of the modern take on divers these days, the 14060m was trying to recreate the past. The 124060 still looks as massive as the 114060 and trying to make it like only the "uninitiated" don't get the "big" differences is quite condescending. They are literally minor little changes, the thing is still "big."

14060m entry level?

3:31 "It's really basic as FUCK, but is really all you need..." Perfectly said! I think I am going to purchase a 2007 2-Liner No-Date Sub :D

TUDOR Black Bay 54 for you.

OK,YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT THE SELLING MORE BUT ITS A PITY,SOMETIMES ANCIENT THINGS ARE MORE BEAUTIFUL AND THIS IS THE CASE!THAT'S WHY THEY BECAME FAMOUS IN THAT TIME AFTER THE MOVIES OF JAMES BOND!THIS NEW SUBMARINERS ARE TO BIG AND UGLY!

Great video

ALL THESE SUBMARINES ARE BIG AND UGLY!THE BEST MODEL WAS THE MODEL OF JAMES BOND IN THE MOVIE GOLDFINGER WITH THE CIRCUNFERENCES OF THE MINUTES BIGER! PITY THAT ROLEX DO NOT DO THAT MODEL AGAIN,THEY WOULD SELL MORE SUBMARINERS THAN NOW!

“”If it’s a dive watch, why would you need the date”? Then if you’re not diving, why would you need this watch?

The newer ceramic Rolex GMTs and Subs are better in every way

114060 is probably the best rolex Submariner ever

New 12 series submariner is made for an increasingly obese population. Huge.

Nice vlog i agree Enjoy

Bracelet on the Omega 3861 looks really nice!! The pointed crown brand messed it up on the NEW Submariner with their 41mm and massive ugly bracelet.

Whatever you do......don’t put the watch on your wrist!!

Was sarcasm fella

And the sea dweller deep sea blue is the best of the series.

Sadly a tool watch worn by people who work in the office and people who buy them put them in a draw 🤣😂👍👍

The 124060 is like a fat woman with skinny legs..

Yaw yaw meh 🔥🔥🔥 wassaaaapp

Ammm,soo...

Just get yourself a Blackbay 54

Brother the best Rolex submariner is 40mm it’s the original 41mm is a joke