Rome 2 - Caesar in Gaul Campaign #1 

Braden Vande Plasse lol it's a hard thing to do!

Ximen This is intro is one of the rare one's that are actually pretty good imo

So we went to McDonald's. The Senate got Happy Meals. It was a good compromise.

8,954,681 views in game he uses the same mode throughout his entire life

there is the AAA generals mod now so you can get a young caesar then he will get older as time passes

Stress

Александр Леонкин My thoughts exactly! Have the whole campaign map as big and detailed as this. And give us the option of ''short campaign'', so if you don't wanna go map completion, you'll get victory once you've conquered Gaul, subdued Carthage, or whatever

Александр Леонкин that would be a ridiciously big map. The europa barbarorum map is already crazy big, but what you are suggesting is incredibly big. Would still be interesting tho

meinefressekeineahnung wieichdenkackkanalnennensoll But the campaign maps would be so much better. Invading areas would be a big deal and actually take some planning. The problem with total war now is that it's better to just conquer the entire map instead of establishing borders and frontiers. Take the Grand campaign, instead of establishing a frontier in Syria, it's better to just conquer everything to the edge of the map.

Denam I don't know anything at all about TWW, did it work do have a campaign map that big, or is it fucked?

There are so many mods which do this to games past and present. It is insanely overrated. Campaigns go on for too long and are just grinds. By the later stages, when you've unlocked your best troops, you're creating hordes of Doom stacks and just crushing the AI over and over again. There is a reason these games have the capability to have many regions than they put in; it just isn't that fun. There is a sweet number of regions you can have before it starts getting too tedious. I don't like Empires map where it was too few regions for the territory, yet the map of say Europe Barbarorum is too big and tedious. I think games should focus on battles and the settings for them. Instead of more regions have more battles which both matter and are intense.

Also, it's a shame that Rome 2 and Attila have this "why bother" auto-resolve balance. I really enjoy seeing you fight manually. Let's hope they address this issue on the next historical titles (as they seem to be doing, judging from your Warhammer 2 review). Although I must say I don't have much faith due to CA's latest decisions regarding game design.

@@LucaHMafra Tbf If I have more than 80% I auto remove everything under I fight myself.

Aki Popovic That's just wrong. Especially with Legend's dulcet tones ringing out.

Seriously over HANNIBAL AT GATES ???

Julia was his daughter lol. He gave her to Pompey for diplomatic relations.

Pranav Bandekar he has already done this before

meinefressekeineahnung wieichdenkackkanalnennensoll when? Can you send me link

Pranav Bandekar ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pSuv8jsxfDo.html

meinefressekeineahnung wieichdenkackkanalnennensoll thnks mate

Mateo Kralj It is still latin, maybe plural for all the gods ;)

Roma Invicta!

Or rather... Ave Caesar!

Ave Caesar, moriduri te salutante?

Never the wrong series for Deus vult

ShallowDramatic They are in a locked group so they won't break formation.

Ah, thank you, I've been wondering how he does that for ages.

Why thou thats where the campaign goals are , and now that region is making me more money than anything else. I played it different I set up taxes on max advanced public order tech religious buildings to bring it to normal and now money is not as tight . Putting taxes on very high seems smart considering it stops growth cause you don't have time to upgrade all the buildings most of the time anyways so slowing down growth is very smart , I didn't initially have that reasoning for putting max taxes but then in clarified itself

If you say so, I was under impression that Legend doesnt really like either of those two. :D

I always had the impression that Legend appreciates Rome 2 for the things it did right while being a critic and realist towards the many things it did wrong, especially before DLC campaigns. Over time found enjoyment in the few merits it has over Rome 1. And I have to say that I'm glad. I don't know why, but I much prefer to watch him play Empire TW and Rome 2 over other games, despite M2TW being my own favourite game in the series. I just think the modern look and focus on cinematics and graphics makes it more enjoyable to watch in a video for me.

same thing with the marriage popups, i had one that demanded like 8000 gold to marry a general, click no, went to the character screen, did the marriage for like 500 from there lol

Caesar held Narbo Martius, crushed the Helvetii then proceeded to defeat the Suebi within 6 turns of eachother then immediately marched North and crushed the Belgae and then assumed control of all of Gaul. Legend will never match my pal Caesar

i have to disagree, i'm afraid :( Caesar rushed all over Gaul for years to obtain his victories; Legend doesn't need to leave his chair. That's TRUE victory :)

Armchair Civilian Caesar swiftly conquered Eastern Gaul, subdued a tribe in Britanny and then raided Germania and invaded Britannia then after a Gallic uprising defended Narbo Martius from Gallic rebels and crushed the Gauls at the battle of Alesia. Keep in mind, Caesar didn't have a birds eye view of the battles, he had to worry about morale while on the march and supply wagons and routes. Legend can do it from his chair because he's playing a video game which is actually much easier because Legend doesn't have to wait days for the battle to begin or hours for the battle to end, Legend also doesn't have to worry about Gallic mercenaries and cavalry betraying him or his boats getting thrown off course into the middle of enemy territory. Legend has it easy by being in his chair. Caesar obtained UTTER and TOTAL VICTORY.

Ceasar = TheLegend27

i'm disappointed - i thought you'd know a joke when you saw one :P

ahhhh Rome 1, the best

OK don't watch it then, what are you complaining for?