Тёмный

Roy Jenkins interview| Liberal Democrats | SDP | Afternoon plus | 1982 

ThamesTv
Подписаться 377 тыс.
Просмотров 8 тыс.
50% 1

SDP Politician and a member of the 'Gang of four' Roy Jenkins, is interviewed by Thames TV's Elaine Grand - in this interview Jenkins also takes questions from the audience at home. Including questions on Scottish Devolution and the common Market.
First shown: 14/05/1982
If you would like to license a clip from this vide please a mail:
archive@fremantlemedia.com
Quote: VT26541

Опубликовано:

 

27 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 22   
@harmlessdrudge
@harmlessdrudge 5 лет назад
Thank you for uploading this. Do you have Jenkins' November 1979 Dimbleby Lecture?
@poundlandvodka
@poundlandvodka 7 месяцев назад
It's really interesting how strong his RP speech is, despite the fact he came from a poor Welsh mining community. Speaks volumes about how you had to present yourself to get ahead in those days (and to a certain extent today, of course).
@stephenholmes1036
@stephenholmes1036 Месяц назад
A disaster for the Liberal parry
@CaradhrasAiguo49
@CaradhrasAiguo49 3 года назад
16:00 What does he mean by "in the latter [or former] circumstance, you've got to govern the country"? Isn't that a tautology, as that is the constitutional default: current government stays on until it is clear they would be defeated in the Commons on a confidence or budget vote? Or am I missing something here?
@stevebbuk
@stevebbuk Год назад
He means that there has to be a government formed somehow following a General Election. In either scenario (former or latter) he's hinting that the SDP would not cooperate without electoral reform.
@richardlaversuch9460
@richardlaversuch9460 5 лет назад
"Fairness" and "social justice" are nebulous concepts.
@th8257
@th8257 2 года назад
and yet everyone has a reasonable understanding of what they mean in practice
@Myndir
@Myndir 2 года назад
Roy Jenkins was a nebulous man.
@MagicNash89
@MagicNash89 7 месяцев назад
@@th8257 They do, however that was true back in 1945 when Attley won and started huge social justice reforms, but so was it true in the 1980s when Thatcher undid some of those reforms. There was a very broad consensus for this in both eras. So the understanding changes and is not universal for all situations. Which makes it at least a little bit nebulous as a concept, unless you are a hardcore supporter of some ideology of course, then the world is clear - black and white.
@briandelaney9710
@briandelaney9710 Год назад
Woy!!!!! 😂
@tubularbill
@tubularbill 5 лет назад
He was never going to be a Prime Minister.
@harmlessdrudge
@harmlessdrudge 5 лет назад
The last poll before the Falklands War showed Conservative, Labour and the Alliance roughly neck and neck. If Argentina had not invaded the Falklands, it may have worked out differently.
@notsuretbh7215
@notsuretbh7215 2 года назад
On the contrary if he had stayed in Labour and toppled Wilson after say '67 he could've taken over and then assuming Heath still can't get a pay policy past Labour gets back in and voila, of course he would still have a very divided cabinet and we can't know for certain his abilities on keeping his party together like Wilson (or I guess if Callaghan did) but he certainly could've been a prime minister
@michaelmagarian1081
@michaelmagarian1081 Год назад
A very great parliamentarian and ushered in modern liberal UK when Home Sec in 60’s
@bunkerbill
@bunkerbill 5 лет назад
He was wrong on most fronts to be honest.
Далее
ТРОЛЛИНГ СКАМЕРА СТАНДОФФ 2
00:59
Maybe a little TOO much gel 😂
00:12
Просмотров 12 млн
Tony Benn  - Afternoon plus - Thames Television
31:21
Просмотров 63 тыс.
Michael Foot interview  | Labour Party |1982
25:11
Просмотров 24 тыс.
Hear what VP Harris says she told Israel's Netanyahu
11:01
ТРОЛЛИНГ СКАМЕРА СТАНДОФФ 2
00:59