@@celtic2626 yes it would be a pretty big upgrade, i upgraded to the 1660 super from a rx 570 which is a bit stronger than the 470 and i saw about 20-40 fps increase depending on the game. If you wanna know for sure you can search on youtube "rx 470 vs gtx 1660 super" to watch some benchmark comparison of the two cards.
90% of the people complaining here about the 3050 don't have the card and not even tested it, but they speak like experts. What I can Say is, I own this card, I play all the games I have with ultra settings, no stutters, I don't care if there are any better gpus, I'm just glad with what I have since I got the perfect performance
You come in a comparison channel and you get upset that the gpu that you bought is getting 💩on. You come in videos like these before you buy a GPU not after, and not to convince yourself, that you made a good decision 😂😂😂.
@@BanditzMods hes saying that the 3050 is actually ok for gaming and that people are over exaggerating in the comments on how bad it is even tho they dont own one. Its not being mad, hes just telling people to stop over exaggerating
Hey dude nice to see you here lol. Yea in my country the 2060 is also cheaper than the 3050, at that point might as well just get the 2060 instead of the 3050 lmao
@@mypfpiswhatourphonesees4294 Yoo we meet again. Yeah I also found out 2060 is only $40 more than 1660 super and it seems like a great deal. I've decided to wait till the end of the year and see if the price reduces any further and I will make my decision
@@raz6182 yea i think that's smart, with the rtx 4000 release i think the 2060 will probably drop in price a bit more, also with 13th gen CPU coming the 12th gen will probably drop in price too, so that's a good thing for you.
Rtx 3050 = 1660super with ray tracing and extra 2gb of VRAM. Buy the 3050 if they are on the same price range, but if its 10% more expensive or more, go for the 1660super
Not even mentioning Dlss which is a crucial game-changing upscaling technology completely absent on the 1660Super? Okay. The "ray tracing" kind of thing is not even worth listing as it inherently has no use on the 3050. You can technically enable RT on the 1660S too, not to say that it'd be even remotely playable. But the additional memory and Dlss is precisely what makes 3050 stand out from the GTX cards.
@@NoThisIsntMyChannel Not pointless whatsoever lmao. 2.0 in Quality mode looks just fine enough to where it's 100% worth using at 1080p. "kind of pointless" lol. Some people actually not only notice no difference between it and native image, but instead prefer the Dlss one due to it looking sharper. So you're wrong there.
@@christophermullins7163 Would you look at that, a smartass entirely entitled to his opinion without bringing arguments to the table lol. Classic, and stupid
And? 960 outperforms 1050, just like GTX 660 outperforms 750 on about 35%. This is how Nvidia does things for a while, age is not a main factor which defines performance, x60 was always better than new gen x50
@@drainthis The RTX 3050 is literally the weakest RTX card, it's only saving factor is that it has 8 GB of VRAM. Why would NVIDIA release an RTX card that's weaker than the first RTX card they released 3 years ago? Besides if the VRAM is the issue let's not forget that the RTX 2060 just got a 12 GB variant. The RTX 3050 literally only exist to compete with AMD's RX 6500 XT.
@@laszlozsurka8991 they did not have a budget variant back in 20 series, so basically 3050 should’ve been an improvement if nVidia made a 2050. It has a newer architecture than 2060, newer tensor and RT cores and a bit more VRAM. I tested the 3050, and can obviously tell the ray tracing experience is far from pleasant, and at this point I personally find it as a rather fun addition than a practical thing. Talking about msrp (Which is just a silly number nowadays)3050 is 100$ less than 2060 (Not a surprise, x50 is a budget series) Newer does not always mean its better. At this point 2060 may be a better option. Hell, comparing it to 980ti, 3050, a 2022 RT card is 10% worse than a GPU released back in 2015. Shows how superior and long lasting x80 cards are.
@@drainthis Neither the architecture nor newer RT/Tensor cores do shit for it against 2060. It's always worse than it by a meaningful margin. As for Vram, for those who deem 6Gb too low for 1080p in 2022, which is not baseless so to speak, there's the freshly produced 2060 12Gb which is basically a 2060Super with more Vram but less bandwidth.
If we disregard the price then 3050 would be better because it has more vram and it has dlss support, it also has ray tracing but thats just a gimmick its not really usable in most games.
Play on highest graphical settings, textures included, and get your 1660S' 6Gb buffer exceeded as is seen in the video in a couple games. Then enable Dlss on the 3050, which was not used here once, in games that have it and get 1660S embarassed. That's not something you call a "rebrand", the term would make more sense if for example you spoke of 1650 GDDR5 and GDDR6 models. Now price is an other story.
Considering the TI is selling for $150 and is stronger than the super and equal to the 3050.. I wouldnt pay more than $200 for the 3050. That is the current market value for price to performance.
@@pastelmacaroon the states.. this is not necessarily the average price but the decent prices I've seen after looking consistently for a few weeks. Some people want $300 which is insane. You have to find the people that just want to move the card and he done with it.
I bought gtx 1660Super too but i prefer rtx 3050 because of the DLSS support. Its a critical technology for gaming performance. I don't get it why you didnt use DLSS btw.. 👎👎
You can still use fsr on the 1660 super, its not as good as dlss but hey its free performance boost provided by amd lol so no reason to not use it if you are really desperate for fps
@@mypfpiswhatourphonesees4294 FSR 1 and DLSS 2 are not comperable. Maybe FSR 2 is enough to compare but a very few games officially supports for FSR 2 "for now".
@@xardas7499 i know, that's what i meant when i said "its not as good as dlss" but hey everybody can use it so that's really good. For someone that has a gtx 1080 ti and plays on 1440p they can definitely use fsr to give more life to their card and of course fsr at a higher resolution than 1080p will look better. But also in general anyone with a weaker older gpu would benefit a lot from fsr. Also they have added or will be adding fsr 2.0 on quite a few games already so thats good news, you can go to ancient gameplay's youtube channel and check his community post, he posted a list there.
Me están vendiendo una pc con la RTX 3050 y un i5 10400F 16 de Ram en DDR4-3200MHZ y un tera de espacio por 650 dolares no se si comprar la para empezar a jugar en una pc
@@eusojedrevadnal3181 I am just listing the price range around the msrp, and I am just saying it from my pov, if it doesnt apply to his sorry then. just trying to help.
The best is the 1660, much cheaper than the 1660 Super ( and almost half the price of a 3050) and you overclock the memory and the core and it gives you 10% more performance (minimum), turning into a 1660 Super.
I disagree, they offered good price to performance by cutting out those unnecessary at this performance range RT cores. Specifically the Super variants, the rest are kinda lack luster tho.
In Vram-bound scenarios where 6Gb don't quite cut it, which in certain games is a possibility even at 1080p, the 3050 would outdo the Ti as well. Not mentioning Dlss, or lack thereof on the GTX.
@@coperphil fsr 2.0 is improved a lot and it looks on par with dlss. Also no point in getting the rtx 3050 anyways if rx 6600 is available for the same price or only a bit more expensive lol.
