Pascalchads be like: I mean what can you do with a 4070TS that you can't do with a 1070? Raytrace John Wicks balls in Cybercuck? I aint payin $800 to see that bro.
My daughter still using her Gigabyte 1070 OC just a bit longer. She was going to get my trusty 3070FE but not with the disappointment that's been Super cards. RTX 5 here we come!
I don't get why everyone is so pressed about it. Yall really expected it to be a 4080 for $400 lesss? Most games you're seeing 5-10% increase. Plus, gaming isn't everything. Creative applications are gonna see a really nice boost from the extra vram. It's better than the 4070ti and it didn't go up in price, I can't complain about that.
Well on paper it should be way faster: 10% more cuda cores 10% more TMUs 20% more Rops 256bit and 33% more bandwidth 4gb more Vram helps in 4k. It should be easily 15% and maybe little more faster than 4070ti in 4k. But nvidia did not increase L2 cache and power limit and that pretty much cripled this card. Also they using worst rejected crap cores from 4080 and that means big leakage. I saw in some comparing videos that 4070ti super often have higher power consuption than 4080 when both runs at same clock. Pretty mindblowing.
It sounds like none of you newbies heard about overclocking. Also duh, low end models will always be worse with power efficiency and this card has no FE which made the cheap Ventus they provided as reference look terrible in comparison.
@@Chrissy717L2 cache happened. It seems that L2 cache determine the most about GPU performance in Nvidia 4000 series. L2 cache is 48mb like regular 4070 ti. 4080 have 64mb L2 cache.
@@anitaremenarova6662it’s the tensor cores that are the selling point. I see all of these comments talking nonsense. The price for a gpu with the amount of tensor cores currently in the 4070 ti super makes it a great option for a personal ai modeling workstation. Regardless, I will wait for a price drop. If vram is your main concern, buy some computing power from Amazon or the such. Ai tools are powerful, investing into a private ai development station could be immensely beneficial. Of course, if your main concern is the quality of the possible graphics, there may be better GPus currently available.
I upgraded to this card from an original RTX 2070 from 2018. Overpriced? Yes. Worth it? Yes I increased FPS by 120% in all games at 1440P Ultra. It allowed me to keep using my 9900k system with 32gb ram. My last card lasted 6 years. I really needed to double my vram. New games were hitting 8gb vram limits. 12gb isn't going to last the next 4 years. I feel better with 16gb.
heard from people they are using the bottom of the barrel 103 dies and the best quality dies for the 4080 and 80 super which is why the performance is not only 10% behind the 4080. Also the downgrade in cache and tdp hurts gimps the card. They are also using the best 104 dies for the 70ti which is why its so close
Yes, the "4070 ti Super" is indeed using "broken" AD103 chips that didn't quite make the cut (to become 4080). nVidia have been putting aside these lesser chips for over a year now, and finally found a good use for them.
You have no clue what you're talking about, it's only lacking 10% behind the 4080 which is fine given the much cheaper cost. Overclocked you can easily close that gap.
I got my rtx4070 (non super) near launch as an “open box” model for $490USD plus taxes and I’m happy with its gaming performance in my HTPC setup and 4K OLED for chilling on the lounge gaming session for high refresh rate 1080p1440p and ~60+fps for single player titles with DLSS quality settings. It’s been a great experience and fair price and it’s gotten good use and serves it purpose well.
Will the 50 series have this stupid power connector though? Otherwise, I'll be waiting on AMD to update their cards. I'll take 3 x 8 pin connectors any day over a faulty single connector that melts or if it wiggles slightly, your game crashes.
The issue is most of the games being released that would need a card like this are total garbage. There really isn't a need to upgrade for a lot of people. Games are usually what encourage people to upgrade. No one drops $500-$1000+ on a GPU for bragging rights unless they are crazy. Games drive the need for upgrades. The games are total trash lately. Very few of them are worth spending that kind of money on. I upgraded from a 1070 Ti in 2019 to 2070 Super, and I am still using it. I would like to upgrade but so far, I haven't had a reason to upgrade. My monitor is still 1080p and all the games I play work fine with the 2070 Super. I have had it for a little more than 4 years now. I have yet to see a game that makes me want to upgrade to a new GPU. The last game I upgraded my PC for was RDR2 and that was a new GPU in 2019 (2070 Super) and a new motherboard and CPU (AMD) in 2020.
Trouble with waiting for the 5000 series is the same thing will happen as happened to the 4090, they will be in short supply, over priced or unobtainable for a long time.
I just ordered one RTX 4070 TI SUPER :) , for me the boost of performance in game is okay. the boost of productivity in 3d rendering software like vray worth the price, 16 Gb are future proof, the card use less watt than 4080 and is smaller .... and it's really less expensive than the 4080
9 месяцев назад
That's the same idea that I have. But then again, anything is an upgrade from a gtx 1080ti.
That's what people said about the R9 390 compared to the GTX 970 with it's 3.5GB of VRAM. The R9 390 had 8GB of VRAM and people were claiming it would be future proof. It really wasn't.
Don't listen too much to other gamers. From my point of view, PC gamers are really vocal... I've always played playstation and just now built my own PC. I got the regular 4070 Super, and I'm very happy with it. Plays like a dream. Kind of miss 4k, but with 1440p with ultra settings and great raytracing, I'm gonna survive 😅
@@wulfone5961 You are aware that came out in 2015? Your card will die sooner than that becomes an issue. With 16GB it will be a bit faster but still, in 7+ years rasterization will be the thing to give out first.
I was looking at building my first PC with the 4070 ti super/7600x. I have an Rx580 4 GB right now... Is this card really that much of a disappointment?
What hype GPU is what it was meant to be! Its meant to replace RTX 4070ti not vanilla RTX 4080, that replace will be in the form of RTX 4080 Super which will bring even less progress but better price.
@@club4ghz the 3070 did its duty for long enough and picked this 2nd one up cheap. I'm only doing 1440p. Works great for me. Just saying I'm glad I didn't fork out for this overpriced, underwhelming card. I'll stick where I am until the whole pc needs a refresh.
Haha, I have an rtx 3070ti and I am not buying this. Not with that pricing and not with stupid companies like Ubisoft saying we should get used to not owning our games. Maybe starving these companies a bit will soften their attitude,
I was planning on picking up the 4070ti super until it released. Like many, I will wait. I may pickup the 4080 super like others if they are available.
Nothing wrong with the 4070ti super, people hyped themselves and are now disappointed 😂 it was never going to be a 4080 replacement! It's the cheapest nvidia card with 16gb of vram. You will never notice the difference between a 4080 and 4070ti super @1440p especially with DLSS
@@Amp_Edition never said there was anything wrong with it. Just be getting the 4080 super now instead if it’s available and if it’s price to performance makes sense. Laughing crying emoji face to make me feel clever.
@burnbarrelnetwork4013 I was just sharing my thoughts and trying to save you 200$ minimum, I wasn't trying to shame you or make you feel dumb, the emoji was me laughing at people who believed the hype of the 4070ti super was supposed to perform more like a 4080 so they didn't have to pay the premium. It's just nvidia being the scam artist that they are. Make the card everyone wants close to the price to the one before it so they say...screw it, its only 200 more or whatever the amount may be. Just like the 4080 and 4090, they are trying to upsale people. Clearly they could have made the 4080 200$ cheaper this whole time! You'll never notice the difference between the 4070ti super and the 4080 unless you watch a fps counter, with an overclock and dlss you really won't notice! But hey its your cash. Don't be so sensitive, I don't use emoji to be clever, I can use facts and data for that.
I knew 4070 Super will be the most exiting card this gen. It is strange, that so many people really thought Nvidia will give them 4080 for $800. Have they already forgot that 4070 Ti should have been 4080 12GB? 4080 Super will also be ~5% faster than non-Super. 4090 still exists for everyone who wants much faster card.
Maybe in bandwidth heavy games, the 4070 Ti Super could provide a bigger performance uplift. If they had given the 4070 Ti Super a few hundred more CUDA Cores and slightly more L2 Cache, that could have made a big difference. Nvidia said the 4070 Ti Super is 15% faster than the 4070 Ti. It's more like 10% faster, and that’s at 1440p and 4K where the biggest margins would be.
Finally someone points out the cache. Even Tom’s hardware review still has the 64MB of cache and point it out as a bonus. Very few reviews caught this.
@@Obie327it would be too close to the 4080. ADA is very sensitive to cache which is how they were able to go down to a 192 bit bus on lower cards. They talked about this on their spec breakdown.
@@jassco2 True, Totally get their dilemma, But then again who is really the loser here? The GPU performance flattening, Cache lacking, 800 pound pretending Gorilla thumping,, Or the consumer who has to suffer the Wallet rape from buying it? lol Thought it was funny. Peace!
I sold my 4090 and bought a 2080ti for $250.00. Honestly happier with the 2080ti, especially since it’s a good bin. 10% behind a stock 3080 when it’s using a ~400w vbios. And $300.00 less in the used market, no brainer really. I am done with high end shit
This gpu is still a really good upgrade tho. It’s been killing 1440p 180hz max settings 100+ fps on hard titles like Tarkov and Star Citizen. It’s been such a nice upgrade from my 1070ti
I've been wondering about the purpose of L2 cache for GPUs. The most noticeable difference I see from RTX 3000 to 4000 is that 4000 has a lot more L2 cache. However, when comparing benchmarks between 3000 and 4000 the performance in terms of 1% lows is about the same. The VCache for CPUs helps out the 1% lows that doesn't seem to be the case for GPUs. I suspect that more L2 cache only helps out with power efficiency.
Lol idk what to tell you but it helps massively. Also you know that so called driver overhead advantage amd had? Yeah it's gone with the 40 series and it was a thinf specifically because of the extra cache on amd allowing for much better throughput at low core utilisation such as with esporys games. The 40 series has 0 ipc uplift compared to the 30 series at a core level. It's literally all the cache and clocks giving something like a 4070 with the same corres as a 3070, significantly more performance.
Yes. The only worthwhile upgrade is the 4080 Super, 4090, or 7900 XTX. You definitely want to wait until next generation. In fact, you can skip this and the next generation.
Watching this on my MSI 4070 Super nearly 24 hours in use now: The temperature is very stable and wattage usages impressive low. 2 Huge benefits already! About the game play: well we all have seen the benchmark videos. Coming from an GTX 3060 I am easily impressed I guess.
What resolution? I have a 3060 too but I can’t justify spending nearly $1000 after taxes here in canada for a 70 tier card. Our dollar sucks so that doesn’t help 😂
@@NGreedia 3840 x 1600 144hz on an Alienware AW3821dw 38 inch display. I know many people may be disapionted. But many benchmark shows that the 4070 super is in the range of the 3090 which is far less power efficiënt, produce allot more heat and much more expensive. Win - Win - Win IMO
There are to many Nvidia nay-sayers. I ordered a 4070 ti Super. It's not a 4080 but it has 16 GB of VRAM. I saved some money not buying a 4080 and it's going to kick tail. Plus, it outperforms AMD's best card, the 7900 XTX.
@@freedomearthmoon1 The 7900 XTX is a fair bit better than the TI super and better than the 4080/4080s. Meanwhile, the 7900 XT is also slightly ahead in raw raster but at that point, i can see a lot more people buying the TI super over the xt if the price delta is just $50 for the extra features. If the XT fell to $650-ish, it would be enough to justify my next gpu purchase.
@@SureBlameItOnYourISPPassmark scores the 4070 ti Super 7.6% higher than the 7900 XTX. The XTX requires more power. The 4070 has 8448 cuda cores the XTX has 6144 OR / 2,304 fewer cores. Why anyone would think it would outperform the 4070? Plus, the ti Super cost less and has better ray tracing. So, go ahead and buy the AMD if you wish.
4070 ti super has one problem, 7900xt More VRAM, lower boost and clock frequencies, with DLSS turned off, a slight advantage in some games for AMD the technological advantages of NVIDIA help to perform better in some games, in others AMD drags and cries far behind. 4080 is definitely above 7900xt and the price difference is not huge Looking forward to more tests and reviews
@@mitsuhh Some time ago we had 4 GB and were happy, now we complain about 16 GB for 1000+ euros 4080 is a fact that it is a better card with 16 GB A card with 24 GB is 4090 and the difference even with 7900 xtx is huge
@@mitsuhh Of course it has banafits. If you mod your games you will notice it at once. 20 GB is so much better. And 7900 XT is simply faster and cheaper than 4070Ti Super. It has also its own good software not avaiable to 4070 Ti Super like AFMF.
@Anderl True 7900XT is a better GPU in every way. It is cheaper, performs faster, and has more VRAM. However if one really need the Nivdia Features like Ray tracing, VR, AI, and blender for example then you would go Nivdia. I personally don’t care about those features so AMD for me
@@AnonymousUser-ww6ns I don't agree that she is better in everything. DLSS and Ray tracing make NVIDIA the leader at the moment Most games integrate this, NVIDIA integrates this into new games. In tests with DLSS, the 7900xt lags behind brutally
Thanks Dannyz for the heads up. "Meh", Seems to be the thoughts on the Ti Super. Looks good on paper? I'm also wondering about that L2 cache reduction and also the limited power they gave it as being the Kryptonite to its Superman. Every little bump up in performance is better than none? I guess time will tell...
Im really wondering how the msi trio, strix and aorous master will overclock. To me it seems like having the same tdp as the 4070ti will definitely hinder 10% more cuda/tensor/ray tracing cores. Strange that the tester cards sent out were the non OC cards..🤔
@@Mopantsu Yeah, it absolutely does matter. You want 16GB if you don't want to be lowering setting manually or the game does it for you (alternatively with lazy optimalization just crashes).
I think it needs an OC VBIOS to go around the power limitations. I'd like to see some modders results with this card before writing its obituary, but it really almost defys logic how poorly it performed out of the box. It was right there on the spec sheet but noone saw it coming, the power draw being the issue. And as quick as we are to assume nvidia kneecapped it on purpose, I think the reason they did this was for their board partners to retain the same designs on their cards. They would have more EVGA situations on their hands if they straight up cancelled their whole product line and replaced them in less than a year because of their own price/performance gating made them unsellable.
Sadly, far to many evaluate cards in terms of gaming and fps. Nvidia outperforms AMD in production work, offers more free software and the 4070 ti Super outperforms AMD's best card with many other RTX cards above this one. I think its a shame that people are complaining Nvidia is offering so many options to save money and purchase a card that suits their needs. Nvidia in not as myopic as reviewers who look at fps. Nvidia serves the business community, Hollywood, etc.
I would get the 7900XT over the RTX 4070TI super as it’s cheaper and performs faster. However if you turely need the Nivdia features for AI or for VR then I would go for the ASUS TUF model as Gigabyte GPUs crack and they will 100% refuse your RMA. ASUS GPUS form what I know don’t crack but if they do ASUS will accept the RMA.
They can both be overclocked manually, that is only what frequency you're getting out of the box. Buy Gigabyte gaming OC, has the highest overclocking potential out of the 3.
I have been waiting since the 900 series for that perfect 4k gpu that is atm 4k 240 Hz in non ray traced native gameplay hope that 5090 will be that card 😊
@@mitsuhhthat will be fine by me as long as it can do 240fps or close on last gen 4k games that the 4090 struggling with that's not those games thats so unoptimised even 4090 cant do more then 30 to 60
7900XT if you are going to be playing at 1440p. If you are going to be playing 4k, 4070ti Super will be better where DLSS and FG are superior over AMD's FSR and FG.
The elder statesman on Digital Foundry's 4070ti Super's review said it doesn't make sense that the 4070ti Super performs closer to the 4070ti than the 4080 given it's specs.
I guess Nvidia was right about L2 cache being much more important than bus bandwidth. A lot of reviewers are getting slapped in the face with reality, it seems.
Excuse me, but how did NVIDIA hype this card up? Anybody who read the specs could see that it would be at max 10% faster than the RTX 4070Ti, if you expected anything more than that you set yourself up for disappointment. Just because it uses the same chip as the RTX 4080 and has the same amount of memory with the same memory bus width, doesn't change the fact that it has less CUDA cores than the RTX 4080. So it couldn't ever be anywhere near that card in performance terms. It is what it says on the box: a better RTX 4070Ti. If you already have that card, don't upgrade, its not worth it. If you have an older card that performs significantly worse, consider it only if you want to spend the money it costs.
16 GB of VRAM is huge with many titles these days. By comparison AMD ray tracing sucks. Gaming is all anyone seems to want to talk about. For production work, Nvidia is a much better choice. The free software is very nice. If you take everything into account, you might not be complaining.
They could make it that fast that if you overclocked it it match the 4080 ffs what did you expect. Overclock it and it’s 5 percent behind the 4080 and cost £770
7900 XT did get a recent big push in RT too, but is still slacking. TBH 4070 TI Super is probably the best price/perf in this area, since you can turn on more features. Better graphics at a similar price is a win. Coming from someone that likes AMD a lot. Low segment (1080p), Buy Intel Battlemage. Its $350 for 4070 perf, with better ram. Mid segment (1440p), buy either AMD or Nvidia. 7800 or 4070 (12gb or better) is good nuff High segment (4k), Nvidia is still the only real choice if you are playing any AAA games. Still. Let's be honest. Pressure is now on AMD in this segment to change their gameplan or be forgotten. I'm pretty sure Intel wants that low segment for the value of cards, and their drivers are now fairly well caught up. I will say though. People are voting with their wallets regardless of this, and basically saying, "We are tired of your greedy b.s. nvidia". Because 1600-2k for a 'hardcore gamer' experience is a bit much man.
I just did a new build and replaced my 1080ti with a 7900xt. I really wanted to get a 4070ti super but the extra features don't really matter to me if it is not faster than a 7900xt in ALL situations. The 4070 ti super only wins in some RT games, costs more with less VRAM. If I can't get >120fps in RT then it's not ready for me.
And that is fine for you, as a programmer I cannot be without the CUDA cores. For AI, I also cannot be without CUDA, it is just superior when it comes to raw compute in every way. While I get it, I don't think AMD is competing seriously in the market atm. I get your usecase is different. You don't care about RT and want to be competitive in a game that needs FPS I am guessing. @@ragu4545
Didn’t waste time to check reviews because I saw this coming Bought a 4080 In Australia 4070ti super and 4080 have a price difference of AU$200-500 dollars (US$131-$330) Despite being a year older 4080 is still 20-25% faster than 4070ti super
@@mitsuhh GPU Speed has many parameters This is gonna be like 3070ti vs 3080 a few years ago Everybody knows 70 will never surpass 80 Nvidia deliberately nerfed 4070 ti super to keep fools buying “within their budget range” when their true goal is to rip off more gamers Even vintage 3090 is faster than a basic 4070
All cards released the last 10 days(4070 S, 4070TI S) are in stock and at MSRP. Nobody was fooled for what I see as the only out of stock card is the 4070 super FE and the PNY cards for the 4070ti super. $599 for 12gb in 2024 is overpriced by $100-150.
@@mitsuhh the 4090m is out of stock, the 4080 too. 4070ti S is a midrange card and I can pay $499 for a 16gb 7800xt from Gigabyte that has no problem playing tittles at 1440p.Nvidia's only selling point is ray tracing which let's be honest, no one uses.
@@mitsuhh It isn't a high end card. Also the reason why he's saying that no body was fooled is because it's still in stock with low amount of stock that tells you is ultra unpopular. It's not a well stocked card and even then it's still in stock with no issues tells you it's barely selling.
Don't really care about 12 vs 16 GB of VRAM thing, so I'm kinda considering grabbing a non-Super 4070 Ti *if* prices drop on those to sell off remaining stock. I seriously doubt this will happen, since I bet I'm not the only one considering this move and if prices on the non-Super Ti dropped too far they'd get too close to the 4070 Super's price. I guess I'm going to have to look a bit further down the food-chain and consider the 4070 Super. All in all, I think GN summed up this launch quite nicely by calling it "meh". :) Which is a shame because I still think these cards are good and the uplift they just got is also pretty decent (especially on the 4070 -> 4070 Super), but prices are still too high. Not sure about actual consumer prices in the States, but over here even some of the bare-bones Ti Super cards (smaller, 2-fan design coolers) start just under 900 EUR. And that, to my mind, is still loony-tunes-territory for a GPU of this tier.
is this a good build setup: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 6C/12T 3,80/5,10 GHz be quiet! Pure Rock 2 be quiet! Pure Power 12 M Gold 750W ASRock B650M Pro RS DDR5 Crucial P3 Plus M.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0 2TB CORSAIR Vengeance RGB DDR5 32GB 6000 CL36 be quiet! Pure Base 500DX 12GB Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Gaming OC 12G
We were told that it's only going to be a few percent faster than the ti, only with more Vram. I mean come on, failed to meet the hype? It's not supposed to beat the 4080 vanilla. Lmao
So many gamers do not understand that more VRAM does not always equal more FPS. What it does allow is higher quality textures even at 1440p. Go look at Hardware Unboxed talking about how it affects games like Halo Infinite etc if you set the game to 4K Ultra on a 12GB GPU. Texture detail vanishes to keep the framerate the same.
Yep, completely overlooked by the reviewer and so important today. You save some money, gain VRAM , great ray tracing, a great production card which AMD is not so great at either. All in all, the price difference / bump over the competition is worth it.
It isn't disappointing, as much as the price/perf isn't for most people. But in 2 years probably they will still be thankful if they bought a TI Super if they are using a 1440p resolution. Currently it does very well at 1440p but that may change. I'm looking more towards 4k entertainment, so I'm waiting for the 50 series later this year.
AMD fooled everyone, Ray tracing tanks performance, power draw is much higher and the card cost much more. Your electric bill will be higher and it's a lose lose in the long run for marginal FPS gains when playing rasterized games.
Low sale volume? The market is saturated after Primeday, Black Fri and X -mas. I'm waiting for all new cards to come out. Intel is introducing Battlemage soon. I need AMDs Rx7700xt to drop in price.
The "4070 Ti SUPER" should have been called the 4070. And should have been below $500. The 70-class is expected to be on-par with the previous-gen 80Ti, but for _significantly less money,_ and to match the previous-gen 90-class would've been the exact push it needed, the cherry on top. Because *none of these cards are interesting.* Last interesting card was GTX 1070 when Leather Jacket Guy touted it on stage as being "faster than the Titan X" (the 90-class then). $800 70-class is NOT interesting. 😠
@@abraham9301 I'm not lieing tho and I dont have a 40 series graphic card why are people always looking for a reason to shit on the 40 series the launch price of 4070 is cheaper than the 3080 ti and performance isn't a huge difference at least they are cheap excluding the 4090
Yeah I'm gonna be one of those that will most likely get the 4080 Super. I find it dumb that the Ti Super doesn't have the same cache as the 4080. The straw that broke the camel's back.
Nvidia didn't hype up RTX 4070 Ti Super. Dumb people with no clue what bus width is did. "must be 16 GB, it will solve everything..." It's not that simple. It kind of should have been few percentage points better, but cutting down chips, that are designed for best full sized performance probably isn't as simple or linear. Also few percentage points won't save a day.
@@cosmic_gate476 this is 3 kids with no degree in medicine looking at a dead rat - "it must have been cardiac arrest... or food poisoning... missing her pills maybe..." Yeah, nah. I'm not a microchip engineer and I doubt you are. All I know is a lot of talks about "busses" and "must be" are fanboys fed with agenda of billion dollar businesses with no critical thinking of their own. That's why we have independent reviews that skip the science fiction part and go straight to results. Which matter.
It will basically be directly between the 4070 Super and 4080 Super in both performance and price. I don't see the big deal. At least you also get the 4GB VRAM going to the 4070 Ti Super from the 4070 Super. 4080 Super seems like the way worse deal
Not worth buying nvidia needs to drop prices substantially to make them make sense lower tier cards don’t have enough vram neither do the mid tier cards to make it worth their price if you don’t have an unlimited budget and care more about performance over ray tracing nvidia doesn’t even get a look
HUB made a correction video today, but even so, it is disappointing, the GPU. GN and others were "meh" on it and I believe that is accurate. Will the 4080 S be decent? I have no idea. I do know that the 4070 Ti was overpriced from day 1 and that Nvidia really needed to make this Super card 256 bit, but they didn't. I don't really have high hopes for Blackwell after the Super cards, but, you never know
RTX 4075- The only thing with this card that missed the mark is the price. I am a huge AMD nerd and like this card. I like this card at £500 but that was never going to happen as that is the price of the super crappy lower 40 series gpus. Ray tracing is just something Nvidia and tech fluencers say- it is not anything the average gamers cares about. If it becomes a requirement for future titles, it will be as well received as EVs being forced on petrol heads and people with the ability to see they are a con. That is what I meant to say, dlss and rt, the new con. This year I stick with our 7900xt, 6700xt and our little guys 6650xt. Next year if these drop £250 quid, I will revisit it and look at the 7800xt to use to skip the entire AM5 chipset and hold me over to AM6
Nvidia's customer milking strategies & prices are ridiculous, no doubt about it. They really f*cked up the market for sure ! But they hit AMD hard with those "video playback" (RU-vid, Netflix, VLC) power consumptions... Gr8 job nvidia, impressive "video playback" power consumption figures that may lead AMD to some thinking in technical terms too 🤔
feels to me nvidia is just artificially limiting these chips to made up price ranges. sad that only nvidia has the good features like dlss... i will just stick with my 3070ti till 4080 performance is available for something like 600 euros. maybe the 5000 series have something nice...
Lol, This whole Generation has been Bullshlt. Outside of the 4090 everything else is Worthless or Overpriced. We've got a full year of Bullshlt. Hopefully Blackwell and Radeon 8000 series brings better performance and prices because this shlt is Wack AF.
@@pituguli5816 You should've invested crypto. Maybe you would be Rich instead a Broke, Poor Loser Complaining about GPU Prices instead of buying the best. Sounds like a Skill Issue to me. My suggestion to you is "Dont Be Poor."
