Russia’s T-14 Armata! NEW Russian Main Battle Tank Completes 152 mm Gun Test 

So, kinda like going back to WW2 tactics

T14 💩Russia🤡

Eurasia begins to unite

​@@AugustusOmegaThe Forever Winter is upon us

Yes but apparently the design has not yet been finalized for mass,production.

@@klardfarkus3891 I think it's fully ready for mass production, but at the time it was designed, no one could have imagined that the FPV drone would have such success, and that's why now, in any case, it's the best tank in the world, but in the fight against drones, it would simply do the same as any other tank. The only thing is that the crew has a better chance of surviving at the moment of a drone hit, but then what? How do you get that crew out when there are drones and stuff all around? Only if there is an armored vehicles But for smaller groups of soldiers, let's say 6?!?! But it changes the whole concept that has already been invested a lot. All in all, I think that the best solution for Russia is to share as many projects as possible with China, North Korea and Iran, because all these new projects of Russia are very expensive and if they don't do it as soon as possible, they will not be able to do anything about it.What's the point of all these projects if you can't afford them?

No it’s still breaking down 😂

it will be an eternal meme weapon like su75 femboy

@@lefunnyN1 Less than a year ago, one of the well-known Western weapons experts laughed at the SU 57 project and yesterday declared that it is one of the best aircraft of the 5th generation, we will see what will happen with the T-14 Armata very soon.

Yeah, who knew Russian stealth was so good?

T14,T90 protilietadlove rakety,oba tanky môžu strieľať protilietadlové rakety do 6km,

152* but still an artillery round gonna wreck most tanks and every armourd ifv or apc,

Except they've built 24 in 10 years. Don't hold your breath.

@@rendezvouzwithrama i said if needed ;) and you are talking about only one kind of tank t14 but they mass Produce t90m , t72 bvm ,t80bm and more. Dont talk about stuff you know nothing sbout

@@QuicksilverVM Yeah, it's a video about one type of tank, the T14, duh. So that's what I'm writing about (you do realise we aren't "talking", don't you?). And what part of what I wrote is wrong? Nothing. According to the BS propaganda, Russia was supposed to have 2.500 of these by now. But then that would involve A having a production line (they don't), and B having the high tech components they can't get any more because of sanctions. You might as well claim it can fly and fire phasers. You might also notice that you've been fighting for over 2.5 years - and you still have only 24 T14s. Meanwhile you're reconditioning tanks that predate Elvis to send up against M1 Abrams, Leopards and Challengers. I'm sure the Ukrainians are terrified.

why rush? are you nuts?

@philippee5631 Zero intelligence quotient, bro..takes some doing but I'm sure you can raise the score..

If the Russian Federation’s new tank is destroyed it could be at risk for being analyzed by the west. Deploying the Armada in its proto phase also isn’t ideal for two reasons. Adding armoured vehicles to divisions would create a logistical problem. This tank is also relatively new so I doubt they have enough shells for the tanks to be fired.

Use up the old before introducing the new..makes sense, right?!

Russians don't use T64, bro..

@@andersonarmstrong2650 I'm not your "bro" wanker. They use any old tanks..

Masz teraz wakacje to pokop piłkę, a jak tego nie potrafisz to np.oblicz ile można zabrać amuncji zamiast czwartego członka załogi.....

It's like you're not reading the room in Ukraine: Artillery is king so having tank and artillery sharing munitions means the tank is protected artillery that holds territory by engaging at arm's length, leaving infantry to hold ground by denying target acquisition to adversary weapons platforms. A tank with Krasnopol, Kornet and similar as standard, can engage at stand-off ranges, while much more nimble forces, augmented with AI, or even robotic platforms secure the flanks.

It could be much better

You didn't listen to the commentary. How might a Bradley get anywhere near a platform using 152mm main armament? Do you not understand the dimensional shift in engagement distances this represents, especially combined with drones? Bradley's are junk status. In Ukraine, most tanks are engaged through indirect fire, maybe you hadn't realised, this trend started before the end of WW2..on the Eastern Front, where the manoeuvre battle between the best armoured formations reached epic proportions. War is not a game. If you can remove weapons platforms at +10km distances, you remove enemy 'Bradleys' before inserting your own 'Bradleys', right?!

You didn't listen to the commentary. How might a Bradley get anywhere near a platform using 152mm main armament? Do you not understand the dimensional shift in engagement distances this represents, especially combined with drones? Bradley's are junk status. In Ukraine, most tanks are engaged through indirect fire, maybe you hadn't realised, this trend started before the end of WW2..on the Eastern Front, where the manoeuvre battle between the best armoured formations reached epic proportions. War is not a game. If you can remove weapons platforms at +10km distances, you remove enemy 'Bradleys' before inserting your own 'Bradleys', right?!

Spoken like a true armchair expert! Bravo!

@@andersonarmstrong2650 Ukrainians have developed a 700KM ballistic missile and they have used it at the moment 4 aerodromes in Russia have been hit . In the last three weeks over 60 jets have been destroyed following 368 jets destroyed so over 428 jets plus 120 badly damaged. Russians had 640 jet fighters so 60 percent are accounted for. Putin is losing badly.

Хочу у тебя спросить, как ты живешь когда ты идиот?

Where do you get this nonsense from? Nothing could be further from the truth.

@@mishamixailov I correct myself. After some more research, the engine is just based on the tiger 1 porsche engine, how much they changed is unknown. There are multiple sources for it, if you just look up its engine name in Wikipedia it tells you it origins in the 1930s which fits the time frame perfectly. Multiple other sources link it to the tiger 1p. However, showing its great burning performance at the military parade and the fact that mass production is still miles away tells more than enough.

​@@mishamixailovThey get it from a clown called 'Lazerpig'. Someone who's never operated a tank outside of a video screen. This clown you're replying to, is trying to connect tiger tank engines, which were developed during WW2, with post WW2 Soviet designs, via...Wikipedia, simply because the format is an opposed X-piston arrangement. The clown omits mention of the T80U engine being better than the Abrams and Leo engines.. I don't understand this where this Western superiority psychosis comes from. Maybe they think fighting an adversary with eighty divisions and their B-team General staff, better qualifies them over those overcoming 200+ divisions and that adversary's class A Generals..who knows? Now in Ukraine, they think that fighting behind Ukrainian bodies is cleverer than not fighting at all, and honouring agreements. In any case, a military grouping of thirty plus nations, being outproduced by just one nation, has its denizens wanting smaller main armaments so as to carry more of what they produce less of.. Dumbing down has been perfected in such minds.

Really? 40 year old Kornet eats it for breakfast.