Тёмный

Russia's Tu-95 Bomber Is No Joke (Even If She Is Old) 

Military TV
Подписаться 718 тыс.
Просмотров 115 тыс.
50% 1

In today’s session we will discuss some reasons Why the Tu-95 Bear Has Been in Service for So Long. Best known by its NATO codename as the Bear, the Soviet Tu-95 was the most distinctive aircraft of the Cold War. It first flew in 1952, like Britain's Avro Vulcan and America's Boeing B-52, which are still in service to this day. The aircraft will be upgraded to keep it in operation until at least the 2040s, giving it a near 100-year service history in the Russian Air Force. Here are some reasons why this aircraft has been operated for so long.
All content on Military TV is presented for educational purposes.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv
/ militarytv.channel
defense-tv.com/

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

18 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 174   
@bryanong6570
@bryanong6570 2 года назад
Probably the main reason its still in service is due to its high reliability, like the 52, and probably lower cost to operate per hour compared to others.
@abdiganiaden
@abdiganiaden 2 года назад
Also if they can be be outfitted with stand off weapons with long range cruise missiles so it doesn’t have to go into danger zone, just close enough is good enough like 52. It’s the long range missiles that keep these old bombers still in service, if no long range missiles then they would be useless.
@ajaykumarsingh702
@ajaykumarsingh702 2 года назад
@@abdiganiaden Exactly. The BVR missiles are making these old machine useful. H6 bomber is an example too.
@protorhinocerator142
@protorhinocerator142 Год назад
It's like a slightly smaller B-52. There are a lot of similarities.
@user-jj2dk5ew9j
@user-jj2dk5ew9j 9 месяцев назад
us a bomber is very good , but us a passinger west said is bad!!
@RasPutintheGreat
@RasPutintheGreat 2 года назад
Reliable, proven, performance, engineered very well, hell this plane outlived it's designers, creators and even pilots...
@simkahop8519
@simkahop8519 Год назад
et have been made with - Stalin, first flight 12 novembre 1952, while Stalin hawe been dead in ars 1953, so ty 95 , It is Airplane yet - Stalinian. 🤔😎😎 - In Service and modernised of course, but - untill today.🤔😎
@mia1shooter
@mia1shooter Год назад
Just like the B-52
@garynew9637
@garynew9637 Год назад
@@mia1shooter b52 old and slow, 160 fast and modern with better stand off weapons.
@Jarek13
@Jarek13 9 месяцев назад
"Outlived" their usefulness.
@NK-ne9uf
@NK-ne9uf 7 дней назад
@@Jarek13you say as Ukraine is hit weekly by missiles carried on the TU95 🤣🤣🤣
@micklaws5520
@micklaws5520 Год назад
This aircraft is on my top ten aircraft of all time. She is just beautiful
@defencebangladesh4068
@defencebangladesh4068 Год назад
Mine too
@cherrypoptart2001
@cherrypoptart2001 2 года назад
A common misconception with people is that they think once an aircraft or military hardware in general have reached a specific age its obsolete or doesnt have a place on the modern battlefield. U have to remember, when these aircrafts were being designed, they werent just designed for back then , they were designed to be upgradable for decades to come. The range of the missiles and nukes in this thing can hit targets from far away without putting in the plane in danger of SAMs and even modern fighter jets with their limited operational fuel range
@xxz1434
@xxz1434 Год назад
Yeah military stuff isn't mass produced cars for consumers
@mikewazowski6161
@mikewazowski6161 8 месяцев назад
one of the most beautiful aircraft ever built...greetings from germany....
@suman3316
@suman3316 2 года назад
My Brother Was the pilot For the Tu95 for Indian Navy...Now He is Operating Boeing Poseidon P8
@sunilsankuru9247
@sunilsankuru9247 2 года назад
India does not have a TU95 lier!
@Jabba.Da.Hutt_
@Jabba.Da.Hutt_ 2 года назад
@@sunilsankuru9247 India does have the Tu-95 it’s just called the Tu-142 for there Navy, so Suman isn’t lying.
@antifragile3881
@antifragile3881 11 месяцев назад
@@Jabba.Da.Hutt_ Aircraft retired in 2017
@Jabba.Da.Hutt_
@Jabba.Da.Hutt_ 11 месяцев назад
@@antifragile3881 oh really. That’s sad
@user-jj2dk5ew9j
@user-jj2dk5ew9j 9 месяцев назад
!!!????
@supersonicdiesel4836
@supersonicdiesel4836 Год назад
B52 Stratofortress and TU95- amazing 1950s aircraft that still operate effectively today.
@PavelAVasilevich
@PavelAVasilevich 2 года назад
Also the in 1961,Tu-95 was used to drop hydrogen bomb "Tsar Bomba" on the Novaya Zemlya Island.
@TheSonicfrog
@TheSonicfrog 2 года назад
Old Russian saying: easy to tempt a Bear out of its cage ... much harder to tempt it to go back inside
@user-hp4qy9dy4v
@user-hp4qy9dy4v 2 года назад
This is the first time I've heard this saying. Hello from Russia.
@andrewflower9533
@andrewflower9533 Год назад
Есть такое высказывание, только, если я не ошибаюсь, сказала это Бисмарк…
@joshuacorden4295
@joshuacorden4295 Год назад
HAL9000 that you
@TheSonicfrog
@TheSonicfrog Год назад
@@joshuacorden4295 Sorry, Dave, I can't open the pod bay door for you.
@petegarnett7731
@petegarnett7731 Год назад
@@user-hp4qy9dy4v It's one of those old Russian sayings they invented in America.
@Firebrand55
@Firebrand55 2 года назад
....because it has the best turbo-prop engine ever made....The Kuznetsov N-12...no other engine of this type comes near it for reliability longevity.
@user-jj2dk5ew9j
@user-jj2dk5ew9j 9 месяцев назад
now it feed with more reliability up date turbo-prop engine
@hamiltoncarvalho2383
@hamiltoncarvalho2383 7 месяцев назад
Alao because of this plane s contrarotatory propõe
@benyomovod6904
@benyomovod6904 5 месяцев назад
The engine was made in Ukraine
@qwwe1324
@qwwe1324 3 месяца назад
​@@benyomovod6904двигатель изобрели в ссср, сейчас продолжается его производство в самаре. На украине, все, как водиться, растащили😂
@alexandrstepanenko5854
@alexandrstepanenko5854 Месяц назад
@@benyomovod6904 никогда двигатель не производили на Украине. Их делали в г. Куйбышев, теперь это Самара. Учи матчасть, глупо выглядишь.
@forfreedomandpeaceinukrain2943
@forfreedomandpeaceinukrain2943 2 года назад
It has been a regular customer for Japan since the Cold War.
@imitv630
@imitv630 2 года назад
Unfortunately, they have to fly there )))
@sue08401
@sue08401 2 года назад
Just funny to consider the B52, the TU 95 and CH47 all came out in the 1950's (I think the first ch47's came out in 1959) And they are still in service.
@Delgen1951
@Delgen1951 2 года назад
produces of the Ture Golden age of flight. True Classics.
@fareazy3239
@fareazy3239 2 года назад
Transport planes and bombers can also be time capsules in the military world☺
@tgsgardenmaintenance4627
@tgsgardenmaintenance4627 2 года назад
Very simple, just like the B-52, if it ain't broke, don't fix it!
@borissljukic1470
@borissljukic1470 2 года назад
Comparing Tu 95 and B 52 I came to the following conclusions: - The B 52 consumes 4.33x more fuel - Has 4x more expensive engine response That says the B 52 is 17.33x more expensive to maintain. - B 52 is 1.14x faster - B 52 has 2.12x more the payload - The B 52 has 1.52x longer range That says the B 52 has 3.66x better features than Tu 95. Altogether Tu 95 is 4.74x more economical in performing its tasks than B 52.
@OrtonHeadXIV
@OrtonHeadXIV 2 года назад
Both are highly reliable, just shows how great they're and how both countries refuse to let go of these old but capable beasts.
@skip123davis
@skip123davis 2 года назад
boris, that is cool!
@borissljukic1470
@borissljukic1470 2 года назад
Analyzing both planes, I came to the startling fact that for the same money, the Tu 95 can carry 2.23x more weight.
@borissljukic1470
@borissljukic1470 2 года назад
I started the analysis with the preconception that the B 52 was a better aircraft, but the facts convinced me otherwise.
@TripleAce1
@TripleAce1 2 года назад
Price wise B-52 likely cost 2 to 4 time more.
@Desire123ification
@Desire123ification 2 года назад
100 years = Great Engineering
@juniorballs6025
@juniorballs6025 Год назад
Minor correction: The Avro Vulcan was taken out of service in 1984, but some examples remained airworthy and were used in shows and government things for the Royal Family etc. Sorry!
@LalisaManoban-ss2cs
@LalisaManoban-ss2cs 2 года назад
Counter rotation blades ❤
@class.C
@class.C 2 года назад
cus they dont have money to replace it
@pitsonamane5356
@pitsonamane5356 2 года назад
The US fear it. They will even send the F-22 Raptor to intercept it. Why send such capable fighter jet not other propeller driving fighter?? Bear is the monster of the sky....
@randomuser5443
@randomuser5443 2 года назад
@@pitsonamane5356 crazy idea, the f22s were in the area and we needed intelligence on them
@artemvektor1
@artemvektor1 2 года назад
Actually all Russian operational Tu95's are much younger then American b52's
@aloh5613
@aloh5613 2 года назад
It has a secondary role... Annoying the British, by flying close to the UK every other month 😂😂
@KillerPigeon-ct6ss
@KillerPigeon-ct6ss 2 года назад
Literally every other month lol!
@kingofcrimson4177
@kingofcrimson4177 2 года назад
True. Bet you it’ll be here in January, especially with the current tension on the Ukrainian border to ‘keep an eye on us’
@haimcukerman1012
@haimcukerman1012 2 года назад
And nobody knows what is onboard. Maby some stupid 50 megatons.
@joshuacorden4295
@joshuacorden4295 Год назад
@@kingofcrimson4177 I hate Ukraine. From Birmingham.
@SilverforceX
@SilverforceX 5 месяцев назад
Its still potent because of the missiles it carry which are modern cruise missiles, including the new hypersonic variants. It doesn't need to be agile or fast, because its range strike are the missiles not the platform itself. Plus, its reliable, efficient.
@IqbalKhan-eg9fc
@IqbalKhan-eg9fc 2 года назад
World most advanced and reliable biggest bomber aircraft Tu 95
@Picasso_305
@Picasso_305 9 месяцев назад
With that push and pull turbine engine system and swept back wings could teach 575 miles per hour for a prop driven aircraft of the 1950s was great
@ferminbf2224
@ferminbf2224 2 года назад
..... because it´s true badass aircraft
@adilachahbar3154
@adilachahbar3154 2 года назад
Tu 95 Bear voice is terrifying and beautiful
@mibfox
@mibfox Год назад
Oldie but goldie. Such a fine plane.
@alphasixfive1658
@alphasixfive1658 2 года назад
One flew over us in SE Asia in 1986 and took photos.
@petegarnett7731
@petegarnett7731 Год назад
Unique. The only bomber you can hear coming before it appears on your radar screen
@user-jj2dk5ew9j
@user-jj2dk5ew9j 9 месяцев назад
but now is carry rocket faster than you thing
@user-jz1ft5jp5k
@user-jz1ft5jp5k 8 месяцев назад
Нет не услышите его рев , он скинет ракеты в безопасной зоне и повернет.
@anoopharidas9261
@anoopharidas9261 2 месяца назад
What's the name of the soundtrack in the video?
@imrekalman9044
@imrekalman9044 2 года назад
There have been attempts to make another aircraft with such an awesome soundtrack, including with contra-rotating propellers, but all failed to deliver. That's why the BEAR remains in service.
@simkahop8519
@simkahop8519 Год назад
The Most powerful and fast turboprops EVER! This is the title, and with those engines - just look wha URSS have done - AN - 22 Antei - cargo aircraft, with same engines, such a Beauty!😎😇🥰😍😁 - Up to 80 tonnes!😎 - in turboprops, it is WOW, anyway. 😮😎🙂
@wallstreet497
@wallstreet497 2 года назад
If it doesn't break don't fix it.
@JungleYT
@JungleYT 2 года назад
*Spinny, spinny, spinny... Tee, Tee I once read a story by an F-15 interceptor pilot who described his teeth as rattling, so powerful is the sound wave from those engines as he closed in on the thing!*
@mr.aleximer
@mr.aleximer Год назад
Is it true that its propeller blade tips move faster than sound? 😳
@per-cq5nk
@per-cq5nk 2 года назад
The Tu-95MS and MSM have at least 18 years less than the B-52H. The first mass production Tu-95MS has 19 years less than the last B-52H.
@Subgunman
@Subgunman 2 года назад
Wrong, the Avro Vulcan has been retired some years back.
@ronwilsontringue6574
@ronwilsontringue6574 8 месяцев назад
Where can I buy one??
@enhancedutility266
@enhancedutility266 2 года назад
Long range, cheap, can hold missiles and bomb's why not.
@billmorris2613
@billmorris2613 2 года назад
Good morning to all from SE Louisiana 22 Jan 22.
@Military-TV
@Military-TV 2 года назад
Hello there!
@krisnawangsa5030
@krisnawangsa5030 Год назад
with a contra rotated propeller can Russia apply it to jet engines for next Bear ???
@samuelweir5985
@samuelweir5985 2 года назад
"Russia's Tu-95 Bomber is No Joke" You wouldn't even hear the joke if you were on a Tu-95 - or even for many days after the flight ended.
@MrDino1953
@MrDino1953 2 года назад
Why does it have a negative dihedral angle on the main wings?
@percival5771
@percival5771 2 года назад
to induce instability. because its so heavy and the wings root towards teh upper half of teh fuselage cross-section that "hanging weight" makes it awfully hard to control with ailerons. therefore negative dihedral gives it that instability and thus sensitivity to roll input. mind you there is likely other reasons for this too but i imagine what i said applies to it just as much as the titanic antonov AN-225
@justarandomrussiasupersoni4402
@justarandomrussiasupersoni4402 2 года назад
That's My Friend
@chippy2986
@chippy2986 2 года назад
Is the Vulcan still in service today?
@frimodig
@frimodig 2 года назад
All the british V-bombers have been retired since the collapse of the Soviet Union.
@eraserstp
@eraserstp 2 года назад
@@frimodig this is sad actually
@paulschab8152
@paulschab8152 2 года назад
No, the Vulcan left RAF service in 1984. XH558 last flew in 2015.
@chippy2986
@chippy2986 2 года назад
This was more directed at the creator and his misinformation on the Vulcan and B52 still being in service today, I know full well the Vulcan is not in service today at all.
@paulschab8152
@paulschab8152 2 года назад
@@chippy2986 Yea, I heard him say the Vulcan was still in service and SMH.
@benyomovod6904
@benyomovod6904 5 месяцев назад
No cash for new development, less sensitive to EMP, more fuel efficency
@cujbaion1
@cujbaion1 2 года назад
Because it's working - like a knife, would you buy a new fancy knife like iPhones?
@shepherdlusale1459
@shepherdlusale1459 2 года назад
3000 km thats awesome
@alexkor380
@alexkor380 Год назад
Х-101, 102 (the same missile Х-101, only with a thermonuclear warhead, power up to 1 megaton) The maximum range is 5500 kilometers.
@The_BIG_salad
@The_BIG_salad 2 года назад
My favorite Russian plane
@michaeladams9641
@michaeladams9641 2 года назад
Yes modernized reverse engineered B29 excellent American engineering.
@321bytor
@321bytor 2 года назад
The Vulcan is not in service now.
@msb3235
@msb3235 2 года назад
Meh, the Russian simply has no moolah to do replace it...
@user-fn8jo2mo2d
@user-fn8jo2mo2d 11 месяцев назад
This is not Oddworld. Go back to your post in Rupture farms or you'll be turned into a Mudokon Pop!
@adilachahbar3154
@adilachahbar3154 2 года назад
Because she can get the job done
@borischilykyn4923
@borischilykyn4923 Год назад
The Tu-95MS is a cruise missile bomber born in the 70s. Its first flight is in 1979, in the city of Taganrog, into mass production from the 80s. It is basically a Navy Tu-142MK, modified for the Soviet (now Russian) Long Range Aviation. Nothing to do with a "Tu-95 Bear". The Tu-95 Bear is not in the Russian service sice early 90s..... Nothing to do also with the B-52 (the last B-52H is from 1962...), different aircraft, different purposes: the Tu-95MS is a cruise missile carrier, no bombs.
@cbrito573
@cbrito573 2 года назад
Brasil Soberano
@Mahmud-ey4ee
@Mahmud-ey4ee 2 месяца назад
Very well engineered designers russian
@Jarek13
@Jarek13 9 месяцев назад
I say the AA cannons in the back are a "Joke"
@TheGrenadier97
@TheGrenadier97 2 года назад
If it works, why worry?
@user-jn2gc8fk6q
@user-jn2gc8fk6q 4 месяца назад
Regularly gets intercepted round the UK so if its war it's toast
@rastamoose
@rastamoose Год назад
The vulcan was shut down years ago
@vincentwinfield4376
@vincentwinfield4376 Год назад
The Vulcan isn’t still in service 😂😂
@robgraham5697
@robgraham5697 2 года назад
We have spotted the enemy task force. Dosvidanya Rodina!
@MrKhan-sn3ud
@MrKhan-sn3ud 2 года назад
Missiles fired from TU-95 has range of 3000 km????
@alexkor380
@alexkor380 Год назад
Х-101, 102 (the same missile Х-101, only with a thermonuclear warhead, power up to 1 megaton) The maximum range is 5500 kilometers.
@gourmetmasters910
@gourmetmasters910 5 месяцев назад
If it aint broke dont try to fix it
@engchoontan8483
@engchoontan8483 Год назад
250lb bombs are not that expensive...use smaller and more should do the trick. 250lb are about the smallest.
@jesuscarrion1381
@jesuscarrion1381 Год назад
Vulcan is retired.
@colombiaturismoyviajes
@colombiaturismoyviajes 6 месяцев назад
Congrat to russian designers, it is very danger yet
@kingofcrimson4177
@kingofcrimson4177 2 года назад
Basically the TU-95 and its variants are the Russians opposite to your (US) B-52, but without the much better payload capacity? The RAF retired the Vulcan years ago. Last combat usage was against Argentine Airfields in the 1982 Falkland War.
@j.m.5995
@j.m.5995 2 года назад
Ronald Reagan used to make fun of the Soviets but I guess the Soviets are getting the last laugh
@alexkor380
@alexkor380 Год назад
Just as at first the United States laughed at the drunken Yeltsin, and now the whole world is laughing at "sleeping Joe".
@buddyb4343
@buddyb4343 2 года назад
One of the reasons it's still in service? Perhaps because it has never gone to war. Think about it . . . In the late 60's and 70's the BUFF was flying over hostile territory with combatants doing their best to bring it down. And pretty much in every decade since, the B52 has delivered; one might argue whether for good or bad, but it was doing what it was designed to do. Now, the Bear is an interesting plane, but how many times was it really put to the test?
@SportZFan4L1fe
@SportZFan4L1fe 11 месяцев назад
It's been active in Syria since 2015.
@THEROC972
@THEROC972 7 месяцев назад
B-52 3 years more older,😂😂
@anandhuradhakrishnan4454
@anandhuradhakrishnan4454 6 месяцев назад
Russia.. 🔥🔥🔥
@hardyanpajero69
@hardyanpajero69 2 года назад
👍😎🍺🍩✈️
@zvast
@zvast 9 месяцев назад
When YT video begs to like and subscribe, I click thumb down. 👎 It's annoying and stupid when they beg before I even see the feature.
@ikill-98
@ikill-98 2 года назад
If it's not broken don't fix It
@kaantransporttransport3198
@kaantransporttransport3198 2 года назад
in-dis-pensable charisma...
@jimallroggen314
@jimallroggen314 2 года назад
Vulcan is NOT in service.
@timmcpherson9632
@timmcpherson9632 2 года назад
A bomber with propellers ? 🤔 What could possibly go wrong, right !? 😀😁😂🤣
@VovaSidorOff
@VovaSidorOff 2 года назад
Propellers ... Why not ? It is fuel economy. Tu-95 carry supersonic long range jet missiles.
@imrekalman9044
@imrekalman9044 2 года назад
People have been dissing the Tu-95 and its propellers since 1952. And here it is, still working. Your argument (what little there is) is nothing new, and just as wrong.
@M16_Akula-III
@M16_Akula-III 2 года назад
And yet it was converted into an airliner and was and still is the fastest turboprop aircraft. Not just that, the fact that it WAS the fastest aircraft at it's time tells you a lot more.
@user-hp4qy9dy4v
@user-hp4qy9dy4v Год назад
The Tu-95 is equipped with a turboprop engine and is a missile carrier. Dropping free-falling bombs from it is useless. A turboprop engine is quite economical compared to a turbojet engine. And it still does not enter the air defense zone thanks to the X-101
@user-fn8jo2mo2d
@user-fn8jo2mo2d 11 месяцев назад
Bomber with turbine engines? 🤔 What could possibly go wrong, right?!?!??????????!??!!!!
@ghostrecon3214
@ghostrecon3214 Год назад
Constructive criticism? I think you put too much inflection in your narration which sounds too much like TV programs which is not a good thing in my opinion. Apparently 559k people don't mind or tolerate it so maybe it is just me but it really does deter me from watching your videos which is a shame i love aircraft.
@eanerickson8915
@eanerickson8915 Год назад
Using bombs is a joke.
@Wrathfist
@Wrathfist 2 года назад
I would like to inform you that the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, thus the "Bear" can't do anything now for the Soviet reputation.
@Michael_Michaels
@Michael_Michaels 9 месяцев назад
Too bad Russia doesn't have a decent human being leading the country. They have such pretty awesome machines! Quirky but awesome!
@utentesconosciuto7894
@utentesconosciuto7894 9 месяцев назад
💪🏻😎🇷🇺
Далее
What's Faster Than A Jet... And Twice As Loud?
10:05
Which one is better Tu-95 Bear or B-52 Bomber
10:00
Просмотров 18 тыс.
Why is the Su-35 Tough for Patriot Missiles to Hit
9:00
WWDC 2024 - June 10 | Apple
1:43:37
Просмотров 10 млн
Face ID iPhone 14 Pro
0:59
Просмотров 22 тыс.
ПОКУПКА ТЕЛЕФОНА С АВИТО?🤭
1:00
Телефон в воде 🤯
0:28
Просмотров 740 тыс.