Russian Bias Incarnate 

Also garbage armor but you don't see me whining about BMPs having almost the same armor at higher BR

@@anonymousunknown4811 most of the time speed is objectively better then armour.

T80-um2 be like

​@@anonymousunknown4811Not like armour matters when everything can pen everything

No armor Meh mobility No darts

Another french main gentelman

@@olivernabelek3125 Getting obliterated frontally in my Subaisse 7.7 "Heavy" tank is always a blast

@@Northern00 Amx Lives Matter

My biggest flex was going full speed and one shotting a pt 76 57 in my batchat before he could even fire back. It's like taking a dump on these kids who have a fully stabilized auto cannon and still get destroyed by a wonky frenchy tank.

@Valian that's lie saying r3 t20 lives matter

It needs a new br of 14.0 where it fights bmp2ms

yeah

right after Ikv91)

That'd be evil, I like the way you think

And move it to rank VI.

I agree 100% with this. It was the same deal with the Puma as well. Honestly my biggest gripe with these light tanks is that they manage to consistently survive hits that absolutely should total the vehicle. If they survive a shot they will look directly at you and chip you down like a pest. I play britain as well and grinding 7.3 - 8.3 for the last few months and facing these two things along with begleits and bmp 2m's was torture.

@@emersonsteffler4149 I came while reading your comment. Light tanks are way too beefy in this game, to the point where I think it is deliberate appeasement to player base that uses them regularly and is vocal/whiny

It has bounced fucking 120mm HESH from Conqueror for me, same with the APDS rounds…I hate it

Buddy I remember this. I feel for you as I hated this thing but luckily I just escaped to rank 6 and researching the chally 2 now

As a British main, we suffer

Thats why wiesel exists

its not wrecking anything lmao

I think “wrecking” is a pretty big overstatement, I play 7.7 sweden and rarely see it.

@@khajaja yeah literally same, im grinding sweden rn at that br and rarely see it. and when i do see these pt’s they arent hard to kill at all

@@vincentvovk7136 Dat applies to every tank The problem isn't Dat it is hard to kill, cuz it isn't, it's alight tank The problem is the firepower, Dat thing has probably the best combo of Canon assets Dat will ever exist. It's a rapid firing 57mm with decent pen and explosive filler, with lazer rf and full stab

thats a moment right there. when it was first announced at 7.0 it was so obvious just by looking how comically undertiered it was.

did this person speak in russian or with a russian accent? Did he smell of cheap vodka?

it can absolutely frontally pen a jumbo

@@dragoneye0979 does it even matter? Jumbo is a heavy tank, supposed to tank rounds from the front, why do people complain about america having ONE well armored tank?

@@marcogenovesi8570 he was in fact producing vodka

Italy is one of the best nations in the game

*when russian bias*

Yeah same with me, This thing is the reason I stopped grinding 8.0 , the Leopard 1 series couldn't do sh*t against this thing

@RCmaniac if you know what you're doing Italy is in my opinion the best minor nation I'm the game

@RCmaniac My brother in christ it gets a leopard 1 with laser range finder and some of the best lights in the game, literal skill issue

Rat containment vehicle

The wma at 8.3 is the biggest sin, I’ve seen people use it in 10.0 lineups

Type 87 have mobilier up and thermal, and the gun is little more Better

Not to stay the type 87 doesn’t slay, the suffering from sand and snow has been reduced and you can now go a good speed on it

The gun on the type 87 has less pen and less post pen dmg, it only wins in fire rate

the most common excuse from bad players defending their OP crutch vehicle "The R3 is fine at 3.7 because it dies to 50 cals"

@@XSpamDragonX The R3 is far from fine

@@TrueCanad1an reading is hard

Meanwhile in my British tanks; Tf is a .50 cal?

@@WearyKirin If that's a back handed comment on my spelling and grammar English is not my 1st language.

As a battle pass vehicle It definitely worth its money Even I didn't put it on my list yet

I can definitely say I regret not buying that season of the battle pass

@@BigE1205 But that's just once in the blue moon🤣😂😢🐸

Maus at 4.3 would be more balanced than this abomination

@@sheldonborb3593 don't choke yourself in anger, kiddo

CV9040 has been powercreeping everything around it ever since it was introduced...

I unlocked my CV9040B a few days ago and yeah I have to agree, the 40mm auto cannon with APFSDS is nice and wrecks side armour but the CV itself, especially the B model is abit of a glass cannon in all honesty, and when compared to the other IFV’s it’s just a straight up downgrade

@@mmmbrunommm3 Bullshit. You dont even play it. CV90 is too slow to powercreep.

@@mmmbrunommm3 ??? This not even makes sense. How do you want to compare the 9040s to the BMP-2M, Begleit and Puma? The Puma alone is already way, way better than the Strf 9040C, and sits at 9.3 while the 9040 is at 10.0. Puma have better armor and survivability, better mobility, better gunhandling and doesn't have a ready-rack ammo. Yea sure the swedish 40mm cannon does a lot of damage, but c'mon, 24 shells in the ready-rack? The Begleit have an almost half-bigger cannon (57mm) with the double of ammo inside the ready-rack, have ATGMs, better gun handling and better mobility. Also sits at 9.3. BMP-2M have ridiculously broken ATGMs, 4 that can be shot on the move at the same time, and also have better gun handling and better mobility. And ALSO sits at 9.3, together with the Begleit and Puma. Like, what? Why the CV90s have to be at a higher BR while being marginally worse? The only one that can be excluded is the BILL, since the top attack missile is really powerful, but hey, BMP-2m also have really powerful ATGMs and sit at a lower BR...

As a swedish main, I totally agree with you

I was watching why gaijang hates france

@@MEERKAQ that’s a good one

Ye

During the PT-76-57 Spam era i used the wiesel and said in chat "cancer eliminated" every time i killed one

@@kajetus0688 doing gods work

I use marder 1a1 and 1a3 at 7-8 br and fuck these players with ATGM, pt 76 suffers

The only CV90 below 10.0 is the 9040B at 9.3. But yea, gaijin shits on minor nations and doesn't care about it since they don't give the same amount of money such as US, Germany and Russia.

@@_awston1637 and it's a shame, there is a lot of cool vehicles to add in those nations

You are a fuckin genius

@ernie_089 thanks

I think russian dont want any colleteral damage so they not using any long range weaponry they got because it will damage the city and risking to be fined for warcrime and the ukraine just smart using that excuse to their advantage

@@arilavanderboom4990 WOT?!?!

@cheggers! And that's why they shat their pants when countering the Javelin. They thought ATGMs go in straight line at 1 kmph and can be shot down by DshKs.

It still brings down mine at 8.7 italy. I literally just had a round where my M735 on my Centauro 105 bounced the things front plate. If you want to know how that's possible there is ONE spot on the entire front end at ONE angle that you can richochet that round.

It's a premium gift vehicle, so figure out why it exist.

Unlike the PT-76 57

Just wait for Czech post war Avia S-92, aka Me262 with resources, put in USSR tech tree lower BR than original Me262, because gunpoint hostage Russian satellite state.

262s are dogshit anyway

I still don't know how to kill a 103 honestly

These things as Hella buggy though like all rapid fire autocannons. I found it lol penning the front of my jadgtiger

@@pastadarasta8131 track and flank or use HE. They are thinly armored. Lower plate may also work for you as well. This is primarily how I've been killed.

@@FiveTwoSevenTHR lower plate results in transmission getting disabled but flanking is extremely difficult at times in 7.3+

One time I face a 103 in the Ho Ri Production, basically I had no chance but I decided to load HE and try and hit him and somehow sniped his cupola insta killing him at 800ms most satisfying thing I've ever done.

is it has aim9b tho? F40 right?

@@rxzxqx6982 he is talking about the CL-13

@@_awston1637 no the cl13 has access to afterburner, he is talking about the F40

Russian bias my guy

@@_awston1637 oh yeah lmao, how can i forgot about that meme plane

The PT-76-57, KV220, T-72 TURMS (in the hands fo a non-disabled player) are so ridiculously easy to play you genuinely feel bad for the people you kill. They are so stupidly undertiered it's not even funny, it's just sad IMO.

@@ZETH_27 Counter for each of these vehicles for a skilled player PT-76-57 Wiesel 1a4: That 20mm autocannon with APDS you can flank it very easly or even kill it frontally from short range also wiesel is small so hard to spot KV220 Tiger E: It can be one shotted if you know where to aim and load PzGr. ammo T-72 TURMS: well anything really its a T-72

@@ZETH_27 Got the T-72 Turms at the discount and it fits nicely in the lineup. Lost an MBT? No worry, i have 2 more to go and a light tank with the exact same cannon as the other MBTs. Oh yea and let's not forget khrizantema, for extra bullying from LONG range. Can't wait to get the BMP-2M. I'll train with the BMP-2 some more experience. This'll be useful to crush my enemies with it harder and better when i get it.

@@alexmaximus9134 I absolutely despise that lineup. The BMP-2M is just as sickening as the other tanks I mentioned IMO.

@@ZETH_27 bmp-2m good til someone gets their crosshair on you lolol

I love the pt-76b, it has stab and nvg at 5.3

M4A1 should be 8.0?!

@@Guy.WhoAsked You know what he means, don't be so pedantic.

The CCCP or CCP ones lol

You knew he already did right W/APHE footage

@@devil5cry Actually I cant seem to find any latest video of him playing the Obj 685 So no,he didnt play it at all. He made multiple videos on the PT-76-57 by now.

@@neromastic4512 probably mistook the obj 906 footage and other yter videos Sorry

it is not mobile, and cant shoot to the front. nowhere near as good.

Nah, not really comparable to the PT76-57. The damn thing is as stable as a house of cards in a hurricane, cant shoot over the frontal arc, is slow as hell and can be killed by any vehicle in the game frontaly by machinegun fire. I personally dont even use it because I really hate its unstable gun platform and fields of fire. The soviet milk trucks with 23mm are way better and funnier to play. The most OP vehicle to ever grace War Thunder though was the french 40mm LVT at its 2.3 BR. It had a fraking 40mm and two 50cals plus no armor is best armor. Damn that thing was amazingly OP. Had a game with 16 kills including aircraft and some assists. No deaths.

@@THUND3RzEdits He is saying that the Autocannon is enough for the job almost always. What does that have to do with skill issue?

I can do a lot better on type 87 rcv compared to type 89 even though type 89 has stabilizer, thermals and atgm.

@@EPE77U the Type-89 did have a few historical nerfs to kt

im confoosed but ok

@@EPE77U rip to the high turret rotation and on the move atgms on the type 89, the nerf was warranted tho, that thing was just too good

ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT? I have killed Mice with the ZSU-57.

It used to be 7.0 believe it or not O_o Maus is the only vehicle I have never once killed in the PT... Seems obvious enough

Isn't the JPZ 4-5 just a large and fast m56?

Sorta? It’s not that large. Compared to a m56 it’s large, but compared to turreted vehicles it’s nice and squat. The selling point of the JPZ 4-5 is what no one seems to talk about, which is the optics. I don’t know what the max magnification on it is, but I do know I can very comfortably make 1000-2000m shots in that thing where most vehicles at that BR struggle. The HEAT-FS completes the package, but it’s still not a bad vehicles just running the HESH.

@@soulforge3468 if I remember correctly gunner have 16x and commander have 20x(can't shoot)

@@soulforge3468 Yes, the optics are great, it’s the only tank below 7.3 which I’m able to fire accurately on the distance between 1000-2000m. Another thing is it has great smoke launchers, they basically don’t cover you from the front, but from one side to. And it has the NVD, which can be very useful in the evening/night battles.

I second this. The warrior has become my most played tank. If it wasn’t for it’s ridiculous 8k repair cost, it’d be the most fun vehicle in the game imo.

I can't lie, that's a pretty accurate description of the thing. Managed like 3.2k SP with 27 assists and only 3 kills lmao. Raden go plonk plonk 😐

Wdym the cv9040s have a magazine of 24

That has nothing to do with balance but how the vehicle works IRL

he got gayjined

They definitely have a bias towards Russians and against US

maybe he was reloading? I think if they're reloading the blast door is open so it doesn't protect jack shit

If it was mid reload. Even so, the second shot he fired was low at the hull. So he still would've died.

Easy; the blowout panels only work if the panel itself isn't penetrated. The angle he shot it at likely smashed into the interior panel, causing the ammo det to kill the crew. I'm not saying it isn't BS, but the panels pretty often (in my experience) work if the ammo is shot directly from the side. This isn't to detract from your statement about the PT76-57; it's *very* overpowered, but in this case the blowout panels likely wouldn't have worked as the interior was damaged.

i play the wz305 and it's amazing still at 8.0 (in an AT role that is). and in an AA role it's fucking godlike, i've gotten 8 plane kills in one match thanks to the proxy it gets in comparison to its russian counterpart. the zsu-57 works as a 7.3 or maybe even a 7.7, with the better wz305 being at 8.0.

They should just give zsu the proxy shells and move it up to 8.0 like chinese one. I agree zsu is really good at killing tanks and has enough pen even for ww2 heavies. Killing planes is very hard though. PT 76 57 should be 8.3 which would be fair when compared to similiar tank like type 89. PT has better damage and pen so not having atgms is not that big of a deal

120 isn’t too bad i think, it’s made of paper at least

The T10A is mediocre at 7.7, what are you talking about? m103 and conqueror are far better.

@@Ropetor mediocre at 7.7 but i stated that its a complete bully at 6.7

@@CssHDmonster most things are bullies in downtiers.

@@garvdog3793 but not ''nearly invincible from every side'' level of bully

spookstoon I know it's you stop pretending ( u true tho even If I hate the hstvl ,not op I just hate it (always os me doing my front fuel tank in leclerc))

@@elcousteau3441 no it’s not I swear

Guess what. They lowered the BR right after this video.

It's kinda indescribably both far better and worse than back then, on average it gets stomped quite fast, often without even a single kill, because of all the nerfs it has had since its introduction, the very poor survivability , the below average gun laying on the vertical, and poor penetration with loss of its apds belt so you will struggle to fight opponents to get kills if you play it like a normal tank, most games on it will be below average if you are an average player. In good hands however, with someone able to exploit the advantages the cannon, speed and turret traverse this thing offers, it is TOO good, my most recent nuke game was with the zsu-57, I got it less than 5 minutes into the game by just outgunning the entire team coming out of their spawn on single "C" cap El Alamein because almost their entire team was fast light tanks rushing C cap, (yay light tank meta) held a back flank after that and carefully picked off some slower vehicles while playing defensively, had about 15 kills in the span of about 2-3 mins and when I noticed I just ended the match with a nuke. Was the fastest nuke game I'd even gotten, but that kinda highlights what the vehicle is, its got some extreme firepower but none of the handholds the PT-76-57 does, you don't just have to know what YOU are doing, but also what the enemy is doing, where, when, and why,(and THEN get lucky) or you won't do even decently well with this tinder box on tracks.