Russian Empire anthem (old rare instrumental recording) 

1721 - 1917 ( 196 years )

I think the song is good

@@blwxrp it was a good anthem

1721-1850s Russian Empire and for Tsardom of Russia 1680/90s-1721

Monarchist music in early soviet era russia Doubt it.

@@Central_Intelligence_Agency_ Nope. It was not recorded in USSR, but could be in USA, France or something. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-zXX8ZQ-Bxp8.html that recording was made in France 1930, so there is a possibility that it was the France as for this one. And somewhere in 30's, without a doubt. And of course I would write 10000-word essay on acoustic recordings vs electric recordings. This one is an electrical which should be abvious if you are into the topic of history of sound recording.

Lenin and Stalin murdered people intentionally. Tsars (maybe with exeption of Ivan the Terrible) never did that

i agree stalin is 30 millions people killing

Unfortunately they had no way of knowing what would’ve happened, if they did, they likely would’ve supported Kerensky or not revolted.

Its best to say the Czardom and the Soviets were no better than eachother, the common thing they had were ignorant to what was happening, the Czardom ignored the problem of industrialization and worsening conditions, the Soviets ignored it by censorship and massacre

​@@USSFFRU No,Tsardom didn't ignore industrialization and conditions,before WW1 and after Japanese war so 1906-1914 Russia was industrializing fast and it would have continued,Tsardom worked on problem of industrialization more and more until WW1 broke out. Had it continued,Tsardom would have industrialized fully and made conditions much much better than during Stalin's times. So,it's best to say that Tsardom was much better than Soviets. Also Tsardom didn't do as much censorship as soviets and Tsardom kept real Russian culture,Orthodoxy,art, Russian politics while Soviets destroyed all of that even tho most of Russia supported all that stuff.

пон

No lol

​​@russianoccupant7383 Huh? Not intended as an insult. Just a stupid little joke. And why tf does it matter which is Vlad?

vlad the impaler?? or putin cause i wanna which vlad it is

Definitely later than 1860, the first ever recording existed until today is created by a French guy named Scott in 1859 using a 435 hz tuning fork (slighty lower A). I think it is early 20th century as recordings started to become more common then (e.g. gaisberg went to Russia on April 1900 for recording music from local artist) :)

@@amnopusthegreat Thank you. Didn't know about the first French sound recording in 1859.

@@MayEmperor30 Sorry I was also wrong, this recording was recorded after 1992 Source: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8kep3iqrPQQ.html the first 10 seconds was the intro song of the Russian film company CTB, which was not founded until 1992. I believe this was in the early days of the company due to quite poor sound quality and a sped up version of the intro. We all got faked

God Save The Tsar

Go read some history💀

@@sayhanwadud6172 Man, if it was recorded in 1915 (electrical recording was introduced in 1925, before there was acoustic method), it would've sound differently. You gotta have a read on history of sound recording and listen to thousands of different records to get the idea of what I am talking about. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-zXX8ZQ-Bxp8.html this is a instrumental recording from 1930, from France, most likely performed by musicians that were russian emigrants (bc you know, Soviet Union). Taking into account both facts we can clearly assume the the vocal recording was 30 or 40, but more likely 30'. Even could've been made the same day, who knows...

​@@jednatakaosoba356your comeback answer was soo impressive, that, the other person couldn't think of a comeback and just shuted up

Когда Россия злой стала? Ирак и Афганистан не слыхали?

@@Neofs yup yeah totally whatever you said yup

@@sfctw1 Ну вот. А то "злая, злая". В зеркало хоть раз взгляните перед тем, как кого-то судить.

@@Neofs again don't expect the world to be able to understand your backwards letters. Speak English like the rest of the civilized world

Dammit soviets!

CCCP

@@Bo-gh6ty Haha sounds like you don't know history, idiot. The tsardoms regime was terrible no matter what you call me. maybe it would have been better under the provisional government given enough time but soviets did do the work and improved the living conditions. And I don't belive in religious delusions, God doesn't exist and is a man made concept, just as man made as the fairy tale book bible.

Russia and brutal regimes. It's like the two things were made to go together.

@@apsifox5874 This is the problem with Communism, Even though the Tsarist regime had flaws they did allowed religious freedom and Ethnic groups werent AS forcefully russifyed during the tsars regime. However the Communists led the country into an dark age of unsafe times and genocides of religious groups and the burning of the russian orthodox cathedral in 1933 and Forced athiesm basically making the people of russia live under an poorly and genocidal led regime from 1922 to 1991. The tsars allowed far much better freedom of the russian people. Tsar Nicholas could have continued to fight until his last breath but choose to Abdicate and told the people of russia not to avenge him even when he had considerable support still. And then an group of communists massacred Nicholas and his son as well as his family and raped his sister which is what communism symbolizes. Russia would have been better off without 23 million brother and sisters of russia being killed. Fuck genocidal communes like you.

This ofcoarse does depend on which tsar, there were some good tsars. It were mostly the last couple of tsars who were bad

@@victorkuppens4962 Tsar Nicholas I and Alexander II where pretty bad but alexandra (Tsar Nicholas II's wife) and Nicholas II was actually not that bad. nicholas was just put into an bad spot by the communists who murderd him but he still made major reforms which really put russia onto par with the other european powers. But at the same time it is really hard to keep stability in your empire when all your govenors and advisors get killed lol. i recommend looking at Old Monarchists video called "political incorrections of Nicholas II" Link: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-QY9ZvOyo1qA.html