Russian Iskander, US-Made ATACMS Face Off In Ukraine | Which Missile Is More Powerful? Comparison

Подписаться 2,5 млн

Просмотров 71 тыс.

50% 1

While Russian Iskander-M missiles have been wreaking havoc in the war in Ukraine, the US-made ATACMS* have just entered the war zone. A former US soldier said the Iskander-M tactical short-range ballistic missiles are a "more capable weapon system" than its "equivalent", the ATACMS. Russian defence analysts also hailed Iskander-M’s performance on the battlefield, underscoring why it is recognised in the West. However, the entry of ATACMS missiles into the Ukraine war stirred a debate over which is the more lethal and superior weapon.
#russia #moscow #russiaukrainewar #ukraine #putin #usa
Video: AP/AFP/Reuters/Twitter
0:00 - INTRODUCTION
0:25 - PUTIN’S ISKANDERS BATTER ZELENSKY’S MEN AS ATACMS MAKE LATE WAR ENTRY
1:25 - RUSSIA’S ISKANDER-M MISSILE
3:22 - UKRAINE’S US-MADE ATACMS
5:26 - ISKANDER-M VS ATACMS
n18oc_world n18oc_crux
CRUX is your daily video news guide to the big events that are shaping our world. We track news, geopolitics, diplomacy and defence strategies and explain how they shape national policies. Crux makes sense of global developments, and analyses their impact on daily lives.
Follow CRUX on Telegram: bit.ly/3fnlLua
Follow CRUX on Instagram (@crux.india): bit.ly/3qSFx1K
Follow CRUX on Facebook: bit.ly/2Lte7iF
#GetCloserToTheNews with latest headlines on politics, sports and entertainment on news18.com bit.ly/2Y4QccL
Also watch:
Crux Decode: bit.ly/3MjzIoG
Crux+ : bit.ly/35mm97B
Crux Most Watched: bit.ly/3KhJ8iX

Опубликовано:

16 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 570

@KlodianHysi Месяц назад

Even the KIMskander is better than ATACMS .

@jacobngolane1105 Месяц назад

😂😂😂

@gregnelson5022 Месяц назад

💯 %

@Tom-yy2cm Месяц назад

ATACMS is destroying a lot of fuel depots and s400 defense systems. S400 can not defend itself against ATACMS. Just destroyed fuel depot in Luhansk. Cold hard facts hurt. So do ATACMS

@weikwanglee4383 Месяц назад

Atacms are limited while iskandar are in full production and direct supplies. No prize for guessing.

@randym7961 Месяц назад

Seems the Army is letting Ukraine have most their inventory of them so not so limited, you know the US army they don't do small . They have a new missile system and were already phasing them out . Funny how older western tech is as good as or often better than the newest Russian tech

@margelatu79 Месяц назад

@@randym7961 Funny how the West with all their "game changers'"' are ALWAYS the losers in a war against Russians!

@weikwanglee4383 Месяц назад

@@randym7961 I don't think so. You forget the recent need to approve 65 billion for Ukraine and Israel. Besides, US is bound to mark up the price of each weapon reaching Ukraine. Besides, where did you think US black ops get their billions in funding. The hidden paper money trail. We are not even talking about corruption. Nay. Think. uS has thousands of Abrams m1. Yet we are seeing less than 100 supplied to Ukraine. You got the wrong end. US ain't life and soul into Ukraine.

@D-E-S_8559 Месяц назад

@randym79619K720s are soviet era systems---the kremlin to would like to expedite old stocks, and there are vast stocks russia is a huge country and defending it is a full-time industry and effort. i am impressed with the russian maintenance culture of its systems....

@randym7961 Месяц назад

@@D-E-S_8559 If you are talking about the Iskanders who knew the Soviet Union was still around in the 2000s lol the USSR fell almost 20 years before they went into service . Also maintenance and Russian equipment are not two words that should be used in the same sentence ! If Russia maintained its equipment better it wouldn't have lost so much of it from breaking down .. A good portion of the Tanks APCs etc etc that Ukraine has captured were because of poor maintenance by your military ! We have all seen the many many videos of farmers hauling tanks etc off with their tractors . And you guys get excited over to 40+ year old western tanks that were broken down when you found them and then you guy shot them lol..

@trevorsutherland5263 Месяц назад

Seriously? Iskander never been shot down in two years of combat, while ATACMS shot down in first week of use. What an insult....

@JustMe-zu2ml Месяц назад

Yeah, OK. They've apparently taken down F-16s that haven't even reached Ukraine yet too 🤣

@johnwi-l_l-iamsf3763 Месяц назад

@@JustMe-zu2mlstop crying now , desperation can't disprove the fact that ATACMS were shot down .. and we know the faith of F 16s .. like those game changer , abrams , leopards , challengers , HIMARS etc .......

@mayhem4899 Месяц назад

Go and take more copium.😂@@JustMe-zu2ml

@chinaKoronaVirus Месяц назад

😂😂😂😂😂

@chinaKoronaVirus Месяц назад

Iskander is failed missile😂😂 Not accuracy . Only hit in homes,house complexes,schools,hospitals 😢

@samipetkannen2226 Месяц назад

ISKANDER of course, massively produced over handful of atacms that are being donated.

@KonstantinVinnichenko Месяц назад

Two important caveats. First, Iskander operates on a quasi-ballistic trajectory in the final section, which makes it a much more difficult target for air defense. Secondly, Iskander also has a version with a cruise missile, which, due to the low altitude, is also difficult to detect. And I hope everyone understands that the 500 km range limit is an artificial restriction due to compliance with the treaty on medium and short-range missiles, which is no longer valid?

@bekeneel Месяц назад

Both are ballistic, but not that rus s400 etc is so succesful shooting down missiles, as like 15 of those systems got destroyed by Ukraine lol, many more buks, tors, strella, pantsir etc too.

@goodintentions5189 Месяц назад

@@bekeneel Ukraine has systems too ?

@JeffGordon-ph4vz Месяц назад

The Russians already shot down a salvo of atacms over Crimea the other day.

@tomvlodek6377 Месяц назад

@@bekeneel 🙄

@josealvaro-bc7zv Месяц назад

sempre foi a guerra do t3..... só atinge civis com kinzalius, zircons , iskanders e armas químicas. Com as mãos atadas,sem munições e com o tra.mpas americano contra o Zelenski , mesmo assim ,, bummmmmmm 💥 tropas putins derrotadas na Ucrânia? Simples . 483 mil mortos __ Inutilizados, paralíticos e evaporados no éter ___ desaparecidos ? 80 mil.Wagners extintos a 78% em Bakmut , todos aniquilados ,normal . Prisioneiros russos? 20 mil para a troca ahahaha. Aviões,barcos, refinarias? Bummmmmm 💥 ás dezenas . Refinarias ? 22 % da produção mosk0w off. __ 7350 tanques e 70 mil veículos diversos bummmmmm 💥 ____ Cercados pela nato,, Finlândia, Suécia, Bálticos, Polónia e Noruega rsssssskkkkkkkl hurraaa vivaaaaaaa urraaaa Ou seja ,os heróis Ucranianos sòzinhos devastaram 70% do fraco exército russo,se fosse com a NATO ou América, putinsss estavam derrotados há 23 meses na Ucrânia . Depois,por vingança, putinsss envia kinzalius , zircons , ataca a central nuclear e armas químicas para atingir mulheres, acamados, idosos, bebés, crianças, patos e galinhas na Ucrânia. Go Crimeia sempre foi e será Ucrânia livre 🇺🇦🔱🇺🇦

@avraniladhikari2622 Месяц назад

ATACMS loose the economic war against Iskandar

@chinaKoronaVirus Месяц назад

😂😂😂

@user-qk9he7se5w Месяц назад

Does it really though when atacms be hitting russian s400, oil refineries and russia airbases in russia and occupied territory of ukraine

@Chivalry2Clips Месяц назад

no it doesnt because the US is significantly more stronger economically than Russia. literally look at the budgets.

@Lionking65816 Месяц назад

Atacms missile cost $1.47 million 👍 Iskander missile cost $3 million 😂😂😂😂

@Ryan-ms3fk Месяц назад

⁠when has it hit an oil refinery it has 300km range acting like it’s unlimited 😂😂

@mbxcutang7918 Месяц назад

The refrigerator parts defeated the West.

@bagonza9593 Месяц назад

comparing which weapon can devastate more truly shows how far we have fallen as people. hope to see a day when we all live peaceful regardless of our political system, race or status.

@christopheropio3656 Месяц назад

It is quite a long time to read a very sensible comment to a very stupid heartless comparison by CRUX.

@Jogrm575 Месяц назад

We surely as humans riding the speed train to self destruction, most countries now spend more on military than education and health care

@JamesStreet-tp1vb Месяц назад

Tell Pooty to stop invading his neighbors to steal their territory and resources

@bjvoorhies Месяц назад

I agree! Unfortunately, it hasn't happened yet in the history of Humans - from prehistoric to the present. It doesn't say much for Humans....

@margelatu79 Месяц назад

@@JamesStreet-tp1vb Tell NATO warmongers to stay away from Russia's border!

@mbr9106 Месяц назад

Don't forget ATACMS might cost 10x more

@sylviesirikhun9321 Месяц назад

Les peuples payent une guerre, qui est celle des costumes cravates, du CAC 40, Davos....Des centaines de milliers de pauvres gens en meurent ☪️☦️✝️❤️🕊️🌏☮️🙏🏼

@jtf2dan Месяц назад

Dont forget america has thousands of them....and has the money, parts and labour force to make ten times as many...russia is broke and sanctions for parts limits them

@deepnurmom1737 Месяц назад

It's old outdated tech us mil doesn't even use it anymore It's 1960 tech

@brandonlongdikjones8117 Месяц назад

@@deepnurmom1737does that mean it still doesn't cost ten times more than the Iskander or no?

@Leadbelly. Месяц назад

@@brandonlongdikjones8117 ATACMS are old stock, if Ukraine doesn't use them they would be discarded anyway. There are thousands of them, just sitting there already made.

@bereketdamtew7766 Месяц назад

Which US-made toy ever won in Ukraine?

@kamalchandramoney3541 Месяц назад

That why they are officially sending troops now . The Himars did had some success though in the first months .took the Russians slightly longer to figure out how to deal with them!

@efghggdxlmfn33 Месяц назад

PR-brainwashing mashine

@Gdb987 23 дня назад

@@kamalchandramoney3541troops won’t help, they will only get droned into oblivion

@johnback0007 11 дней назад

@@kamalchandramoney3541How is the s-400 and s-300 doing in Ukraine getting pooped on by himars and atacms left and right? 😂😂

@fridaynight3181 5 дней назад

F35?

@mokotjolegodi9753 Месяц назад

It is an insult to compare the 2 since it is proven that Russia was able to shoot down more than 50 percent of atacms whereas Ukraine has shot 0 per ent of iskander

@loudtim265 Месяц назад

Proven where? Source? It’s just a short range ballistic missile from the 1980s.

@user-ni6wx9in9p Месяц назад

Iskander-M is more destructive.

@jader9356 Месяц назад

😂

@jader9356 Месяц назад

Ok bot

@darkangel_21 Месяц назад

🤡

@feriferi7134 Месяц назад

🙋‍♂️iskander-M

@onelov3288 Месяц назад

😆

@dragodragic-zl5yt Месяц назад

ATACMS is replaced with PrSM missiles, so the warehouses are emptied for new goods, so its price is irrelevant because it is being disposed of. Anyone who gets it in large quantities can do a lot of damage with this precise and deadly weapon.

@hksp Месяц назад

everytime uki use it, they got strike back 10x n then selinski cries for armament

@Greenbay-bn3yk Месяц назад

Difference : ATACMS is a missile designed for Hollywood. Iskandar M is designed for wars

@RUTHLESSambition5 Месяц назад

The iskandar has shown it's worth. The ARACMS is very expensive and not that great. America should have kept the good weapons back

@JustMe-zu2ml Месяц назад

Apparently Iskander was designed for attacking civilian infrastructure and post offices (based on what it's currently being used for)

@JamesStreet-tp1vb Месяц назад

Yastreb AV destroyed by HIMARS before the new car, vodka smell was even gone. Lol. Two hours after it was deployed--to stop the HIMARS the HIMARS found it and it destroyed exactly ONE HIMARS missile. To date 6 S400's burned to ashes. That doesn't include the aircraft, Russian soldiers, and ammo dumps destroyed by the HIMARS. The orcs had to move their Black Sea fleet because they were afraid of the HIMARS. Keep talking. Your tears betray you

@RusselTanTing-kf8zm Месяц назад

Awesome take!

@zelectric09 10 дней назад

really?

@jubantympuina2964 Месяц назад

Islander M is more deadly

@user-ht8dd8kc3x Месяц назад

ATACMS distroyed russian made s-400 to scrap metals......hahahaha

@gregnelson5022 Месяц назад

@@user-ht8dd8kc3x😂according to who jewlensky

@user-ht8dd8kc3x Месяц назад

@@gregnelson5022 😁🤣according to who PuTIN he is the best comedian and joker🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@raphael3620 Месяц назад

You should be comparing ATACMS to North Korea missile

@stephenhall3515 Месяц назад

"Sub-munitions" means cluster weapons which are banned by most countries. Russia still uses Soviet era cluster warheads but ceased developing them and does not manufacture any. This is because although it is not an official signatory of the UN Convention on Cluster Munitions (2010), CIS affiliated states voted to end production and use. Russia was in no position to disagree and had learned horrible lessons in the Chechen War. The USA is the only known manufacturer of cluster munitions and deploys 3 especially cruel types, some with timers. The USA, Poland, Romania, Latvia and Estonia are not signatories to the 2010 UN law. The 1992 raid on a Russian Navy airfield in disputed Crimea used timed cluster weapons which could not have been launched by Ukraine.

@Tom-yy2cm Месяц назад

Russia cluster munitions have a much higher rate of failure to explode than the United States. Russia has used them against Ukraine long before Ukraine received the United States older cluster munitions . Claiming unlimited supply .Putin bragged about Russia's massive stock pile of them. Besides the new and improved cluster munitions that are a much lower failure rate then Russia. The US has powerful cluster bombs that do not explode. It’s steel spheres that devastate enemy soldiers. But does not leave un exploded ordinance on the ground. Being much safer than Russian cluster munitions. Unexploded ordnance kills people long after wars end. And it’s all over Ukraine. If you think Russia is ethical and worried about civilian casualtiesJust look at the Ukraine landscape. And all the leveled cities. The US does not send its latest upgraded weapons to Ukraine. Keep up the wishful thinking!

@nesseihtgnay9419 Месяц назад

Id say the ATACMS just because it can be reloaded much faster getting more shots in, and its smaller so it can hide better

@johnnewman1483 Месяц назад

😂 copium .....ATACMs has been destroyed while on the move by iskander but iskander has not been shot down, talklsa its luncher being hit

@najiv8797 Месяц назад

"Its smaller so it can hide better" it doesnt work like that bro. Size doesnt matter. 😂

@nesseihtgnay9419 Месяц назад

@@najiv8797 do you even get what the point is? guessing no you dont. smh

@hksp Месяц назад

9m54- series 300mm glonass guided mlrs, 250kg multipurpose warhead, he frag, cluster dpicm and Ap ,120km listed, 200km is good to go too,

@PerceivedREALITY999 Месяц назад

Saying US can defeat Russia is like saying biden can run up the stairs without stumbling.

@etronicw2729 Месяц назад

Ignore my previous comment and I apologise, I misread what you wrote 🙏

@Spartan12317 Месяц назад

I bet for Iskander M

@joshboyer3655 Месяц назад

Iskander wins.

@bpyangyang2153 Месяц назад

With the mentioned comparison and destructions caused by, Iskander is more superior than the ATACMS. As shown several of the latter were shot down and failed to do havoc on the target.

@lattehour Месяц назад

lol atacms are less than half the size of a istakender why would you compare them totally different weapons

@Tom-yy2cm Месяц назад

Because they can’t persuade the uninformed with facts.

@chegekariuki4744 Месяц назад

Iskander definitely.❤ Russia

@SafariJournals Месяц назад

Modo Wa jobaaaa

@humbertomonteiro6742 Месяц назад

😂, 🤮🤮🤮🤮

@roryjoseph7645 Месяц назад

numbers will overwhelm technology :)

@niva0809 Месяц назад

Russia shoots down Atakams, but Iskander cannot be shot down by Western air defense forces, which is a big difference. Iskander is cheaper and more powerful in terms of accuracy.

@delldell191 Месяц назад

Everything is better in Russia, even the advertising. Russia's invincible missiles have been destroyed.

@oldowleye3161 Месяц назад

Lol…joke of the century … russian as never shot an atacams and iskander misdiles have been intercepted many times…nice try bot …😂

@niva0809 Месяц назад

@@oldowleye3161 Iskander has never been shot down, while Atakams, according to the latest data, have been shot down 11 times. It's a fact. Google it well and make sure.

@niva0809 Месяц назад

@@oldowleye3161 Iskander has never been shot down, while Atakams, according to the latest data, have been shot down 11 times. It's a fact. Google it well and make sure.

@niva0809 Месяц назад

@@oldowleye3161 Iskander has never been shot down, while Atakams, according to the latest data, have been shot down 11 times. It's a fact. Google it well and make sure.

@israel_illuminati_Rothschild Месяц назад

iScandal is definitely more advanced...

@abcdbridge1824 Месяц назад

ATACMs are being destroyed over Russia but Iskander has been invincible. Where is the comparison charlie ?

@ahokkumar2775 Месяц назад

Iskander super

@iamTheSnark Месяц назад

But the vehicle is much larger and heavier. HIMARS can get to many more places easily. Iskander, not so much.

@johnwi-l_l-iamsf3763 Месяц назад

@@iamTheSnarkHIMARS is useless now , it's been taken down like nothing with electronic warfare systems

@raphael3620 Месяц назад

@@iamTheSnarkislander doesn’t need to get to anywhere that’s why they have a longer range

@bekeneel Месяц назад

@@johnwi-l_l-iamsf3763 u haven't been paying attention son 😂😂 himars still very effective.

@SnakePliskin762 Месяц назад

Ones about as accurate as a German V2,the other can hit a target within 5 metres cep.

@tomvlodek6377 Месяц назад

I think atacms are a little better than a V2, not a good comparison

@SnakePliskin762 Месяц назад

@@tomvlodek6377 you've got the comparison the wrong way round.

@tomvlodek6377 Месяц назад

@@SnakePliskin762 uhhh, no, you’re the one who’s shameless and continues embarrassing himself after given the opportunity to slither back into the hole he crawled out of…

@neojupyter322 Месяц назад

Iskander is 10x cheaper to produce but 10x stronger than ATACMS.

@mattyboy456 Месяц назад

Source: pooty bot farm. A simple Google would say iskander costs 3 million apiece and atacms costs barely a million apiece 😊.

@user-qk9he7se5w Месяц назад

Yet islander can be shot down by a patriot while atacms blows up russian s400 air defence

@Lionking65816 Месяц назад

Atacms missile cost $1.47 million 👍 Iskander missile cost $3 million 😂😂😂😂

@neojupyter322 Месяц назад

@user-qk9he7se5w mach 7 Iskander missile is shot down by mach 3.5 patriot missile. So funny🤣

@neojupyter322 Месяц назад

@user-qk9he7se5w "atacms blows up russian s400 air defence"-claimed by joker Volodymyr Zelenskyy🤣🤣

@najiv8797 Месяц назад

Didnt even close to Iskander.. while Russia have Kinzhal. 😢

@carlitos2k2 Месяц назад

Well considering Iskanders slam Odesa and Kharkov on a regular basis while all ATACMS fired at Crimea were downed the answer is clear

@Tom-yy2cm Месяц назад

That is completely false.

@carlitos2k2 Месяц назад

@@Tom-yy2cm prove it!!

@MrEdmundF Месяц назад

ATACMs has higher mobility and much faster load times

@rahulrathnayake1104 Месяц назад

⚒⛏nowadays Russian shovels are more lethal than ever -- U.S weapon analyst 😅

@AnthonyKypros Месяц назад

And their washing machines are pretty good too.

@jajasaria Месяц назад

okay kid. its seem you are happy to repeat the "shovel" word but forgot the "days".

@brandonlongdikjones8117 Месяц назад

@@jajasariaAnother day, so what, you going to the front t count how long it takes or no , plus you don't even know who said that "days" thing to begin with obviously 😅

@hassannasir8401 Месяц назад

@@AnthonyKyprosi am an indian. I bought russian made pressure cooker from saudi arabia and brought to my indian. home. That was wonderful cooker. Russians Russians make

@rahulrathnayake1104 Месяц назад

@@jajasaria right , that's plural. I mean the present time and the future except the past. Mr. English 😎

@tmafungo84 Месяц назад

Atacms not cost effective.

@bekeneel Месяц назад

3x cheaper than iskander, muppet.

@Tom-yy2cm Месяц назад

@@bekeneel Direct! Accurate! Funny!!!

@Babuka54 Месяц назад

Российская Армия не меряется письками-она воюет!

@najiv8797 Месяц назад

🔥🔥

@swaggie8 Месяц назад

Iskandar is combat proven missile

@chinaKoronaVirus Месяц назад

😂😂😂failed missile😂 Cant be compare with Atacms😂

@user-ht8dd8kc3x Месяц назад

also ATACMS was distroyed s-400 to scrap metal

@nuke_Godjira Месяц назад

Iskandr is a lot cheaper to produce with the same capability.

@Tsongpogi Месяц назад

To be fair compare iskander to USA stealth missiles. Someone just fast and someone hard to detect.

@ijatpingrhyb Месяц назад

Us weapons aren't that good

@najiv8797 Месяц назад

Its only good against habibi

@Tom-yy2cm Месяц назад

They are good enough to be better than anything Russia had made. By a superior margin.

@user-kb7ic2pi6x Месяц назад

❤Come on Guyz this is an insult .Even non military guyz know thez no answer to Iskander missiles. NO nation has absolutely none has an answer to Iskanders

@Aboulhabass260 Месяц назад

You have compared the inncomparable

@Testio26 Месяц назад

According to Putin it’s also nuclear weapon capable!

@rated-gr3983 Месяц назад

Iskander is like a tiny nuclear blast, accurate and faster than ATCMS.

@tazanddo Месяц назад

Russia created a purpose built Iskander missile with it's own military industrial complex. NATO purchased a profit driven ATACMS missile from it's own military industrial complex, sold from the lowest bidder. Purpose built probably wins, but that remain to be seen.

@pacificventure Месяц назад

had to swith the sound off....

@deven6518 Месяц назад

Iskander, especially the domestic variant, is in a league of its own. That isnt to say atacms arent good, but yk

@indiamylove4833 Месяц назад

Iskander is the Secendar of battlefield❤❤❤❤

@michaelfaraday8391 Месяц назад

Iskander is too powerful and difficult to intercept

@Babayaga97111 Месяц назад

It's a music i have heard already....👂

@bekeneel Месяц назад

so is Atacms apparently.

@Tom-yy2cm Месяц назад

You should read up on that false statement

@francisMuriuki-rr5bw Месяц назад

Iskanders are more powerful than attacms

@chinaKoronaVirus Месяц назад

but no accuracy 😂

@Bacahonest Месяц назад

What type of news it is?

@allanbaldoque2578 Месяц назад

I dont believe cruxx because iskander is effective only in times that Ukraine is luck of air defence while atacsm is effective while russia has enough airdefence and modern, atacsm is better than iskander, islander is considiered as old model😮😮😮😅

@najiv8797 Месяц назад

Yup.. you need a wakey wakey buddy!

@callwar-zr1xm Месяц назад

Russian budget when Putin seated has been able to use it by upgrading the Russian weapons meanwhile USA used their economic by starting a war 😂😂

@VINLAND_777 Месяц назад

Iskandaler? The Hyper-Tonic Missile?

@user-vh8wj9id9e Месяц назад

The Iskander an equal to nuclear weapons

@kingomedlanki6151 Месяц назад

Cue all the strategic analysts and missile system procurement experts

@JustARandomFio Месяц назад

Difficult to compare since Ukraine and Russia target different sorts of objects. In theory, we could find out which system works better the next time Russia targets Kharkiv by sending the exact numbers of ATACMS and drones to Belgorod. In practice, this won't work since Ukraine is not Russia.

@everTriumph Месяц назад

The main shackle on ATACMS is the US insistence on Ukraine only using them within its internationally agreed borders, which includes Ukraine and other territory illegally seized by the invasions. If Ukraine was allowed to hit sources within Russia, maybe Russia would not be crowing.

@ILUVATAR228 Месяц назад

Да,она бы сравняла Украину с землей

@tomvlodek6377 Месяц назад

Ohhhh, they’ll be crowing all the way to the Moldovan border 😂

@tazanddo Месяц назад

To be fair Ukraine isn't the originator of these arms so it must abide by the dictates of it's arms suppliers. Russia produces it's own arms so it can use them as it sees fit. There is no fairness in war and these two brothers need to patch up their differences. That may ruffle some feathers, but it's the only way for these two civilizations to move forward some day once all the mutual anger is flushed out.

@SilverBear568 Месяц назад

Iklander must be a priority to stop

@michaelanderson3096 Месяц назад

Advanced manufactured items = Jobs

@Blackcain Месяц назад

People treating this war as if supporting their favorite sport team

@sajedakhan133 Месяц назад

Iskander ❤

@D-E-S_8559 Месяц назад

i feel this is a mismatch atacms are no better than 9k58/9a52-2 smerch...

@hksp Месяц назад

tornado s glonass guided mlrs 300mm 200km 552 9m544 heat frag 160mm rha, 9m549 72 he frag

@loudtim265 Месяц назад

Iskander is a current model. ATACMS is from the 1980s 😂

@templeosigwe3545 Месяц назад

Wow

@fiddler9804 Месяц назад

Shovel vs ATACMS, who wins?

@macpj12j Месяц назад

iskander making havoc while there are defenses like patriote and arrow and so forth

@JamesSmith-bo3po Месяц назад

Compare the price tag. I'm sure the US one will win...

@davidparsons2391 Месяц назад

Like asking someone if a .22 hurts more than 9. Y’all love violence

@MarkAngelo166 Месяц назад

Atacms is Powerfull

@MacDonaldkachala-cm5gc Месяц назад

Every one knows which is superior

@ds-jm8mf Месяц назад

No 1 wins.

@jerwynjames8312 Месяц назад

Change the war balance? Like seriously? That was humour.....as if Russia don't have dagger(khinzal) to throw after the stone is not effective enough and when iskandar can hit from over 200km further where is the competition?

@leestimpson1838 Месяц назад

Iskander.

@LutherusPXCs Месяц назад

Iskandar and not even close

@maheshreddymanyam1524 Месяц назад

World Powerful 💪 Military Russia 🪖❤️☝️💪💞🇮🇳🤝💞🇷🇺💪❤️

@gustavooliveira-qm3ek Месяц назад

Atacms n1

@JohnnyD45 Месяц назад

🇺🇸✌🏻🇺🇦

@ahmedomarabdallah2052 Месяц назад

😮

@novemberalpha6023 Месяц назад

Winner is the North Korean Missile 😉😉

@SP-qm6bi Месяц назад

What are you comparing Details would vary but roughly one can say that the Iskander is 2X speed, 3X warhead weight, 2X range compared to the ATACMs The 300 km range ATACMs barely carries a warhead of 174 Kgs Creating sensational sounding videos are you

@PerceivedREALITY999 Месяц назад

The proxy war in Ukraine is the first time NATO has tried to pick on someone their own size and NATO is getting humiliated.

@andreww1225 Месяц назад

Well it’s hard to say considering Russia uses their missiles on civilian targets.

@efghggdxlmfn33 Месяц назад

only military targets

@andreww1225 Месяц назад

@@efghggdxlmfn33 no all you have to do is watch the evidence. Russians target civilians, they can’t hide their crimes anymore because everyone films everything. Only a fool would believe Russia only attacks military targets.

@zpqm693 Месяц назад

60,000 Billion is USA?

@1973oiler Месяц назад

Isnt Iskander hypersonic?

@mayhem4899 Месяц назад

Iskandar is hypersonic.

@1973oiler Месяц назад

@@mayhem4899 that's what I thought. Iskander wins then. Hands down

@Tom-yy2cm Месяц назад

@1973oiler Месяц назад

@@Tom-yy2cm no what?

@charleschin6497 Месяц назад

Iskander very expensive

@efghggdxlmfn33 Месяц назад

much cheaper than american wunderweapons

@franktunde3090 10 дней назад

Off course Putin is chess player.

@thedeal86 Месяц назад

We can see the level of destruction in Ukraine even with weaker Russian missiles, no question between these two.

@delldell191 Месяц назад

We will be able to compare the level of destruction, since now the Attacks and the Stromshadow will be able to be used in Russia.

@DanielDeBenoit Месяц назад

The Russian have much more missiles. That does not mean that per se they are superior...

@thedeal86 Месяц назад

@@delldell191 yes, let's see.

@loggerhub4896 Месяц назад

@@DanielDeBenoit when NATO is losing “Numbers don’t matter”. Funny people

@thedeal86 Месяц назад

@@DanielDeBenoit much more missiles? Ukraine has exhausted almost all European stockpiles , American too, how can Russia have more missiles than 50 countries combined?

@b21raider27 Месяц назад

Iskander M cost $3 million each (see Wiki), under 200 left. Mach 5+. Atacms $820k to $1.7 million, 3,700 built. Mach 3+. Precision strike missile replaced the Atacms for the US: range 500km to + variants (upcoming). Mach 5+.

@fooktheeu8332 Месяц назад

LOL

@kamalchandramoney3541 Месяц назад

The Russian shovel is the king of weapons in Ukrainian battlefields!

@eddiehah9842 Месяц назад

Iskander will win hands down.

@Tom-yy2cm Месяц назад

But it’s not

@tafadzwagilbertkays3855 Месяц назад

Iskander is far more advanced and more deadlier than ATACMS. Russians have shot down many ATACMS while Ukraine & NATO haven't shot down any Iskander missile.

@mattyboy456 Месяц назад

The amount of bs that pooty troll farm can spew, it's mind numbing.. 😂 At least 50% of pooty's iskanders have been intercepted if not more.. If pooty's iskander was so potent, kiev must have fallen by now cos there can't be any patriots shielding kiev's skies 😂

@tomvlodek6377 Месяц назад

@@mattyboy456really? 🙄😂😂😂😂

@mattyboy456 Месяц назад

@@tomvlodek6377 so you are saying that kiev has fallen? Pooty's iskander has neutralized all the patriot systems shielding kiev's skies?? Dang!! How did the world media miss such an important update??

@bekeneel Месяц назад

Poor kid here thinking russian claims are reality we've seen it.

@tomvlodek6377 Месяц назад

@@bekeneel right, unlike you that thinks the Russians ran out of missiles in April 2022, ran out of ammunition and are using shovels, and thinks the ukrops are winning and EVER had a chance 😂🙄🤭

@christophermwaka2735 Месяц назад

Western weapons were over hype as game changers but Ukrainian war has humbled them and has destroyed their reputation ,it works well against a third rate army like Iraq ,Afghanistan and Civilian militias etc

@hansb.8 Месяц назад

except nuclear, nothing can stop Russias actions in Ukraine.

@verdebusterAP Месяц назад

You are missing key factors The ATACMS can be loaded to HIMARS and M270 in a matter of minutes The Iskander can not ATACMS weighs just 3600lbs while an Iskander weighs over 8400lbs ATACMS doesnt need specialized vehicle for reloading whereas the Iskander does The ATACMS needs no external support while the Iskander requires a whole chain of vehicles ATACMS can be sent target info, the launcher inputs it and fires Whereas the Iskander has to get the info from its command truck Lastly , the ATACMS camouflages itself so enemy cant tell what the HIMARS or M270 is carrying thereas is no mistaking an Iskander launcher, an attacking forces can easily pin point the Iskander

@johnnewman1483 Месяц назад

Cope harder😭

@verdebusterAP Месяц назад

@@johnnewman1483 its called facts try it sometime

@hksp Месяц назад

tornado s 300mm mlrs glonass 9m54- series , 200km, submunition 552 heat frag and 72 he frag

@verdebusterAP Месяц назад

@@hksp And yet they have done exactly what ?

@hksp Месяц назад

@@verdebusterAP it will do exactly what himar can do, he frag is dpicm and 160mmrha penetration , ap is jusu anti personnel.

@dougbright8120 Месяц назад

It's a stupid comparison and a pointless debate. The two missiles and their associated technologies are completely different and intended for different purposes. Regardless, in Ukraine, Iskander is being used - but not exclusively - to destroy ATACMS, sometimes before they even get a single shot off. There is nothing particularly magic about ATACMS. They are just another missile in a multiple battery mounted on a 6 x 6 truck. They are not especially or singularly more mobile than anything in the Russian collection. In Russian off-road machines are infinitely superior in its often snow-bound or swampy or boggy terrain. Russia remains the master of tracked or multi-axle off-road vehicles.

@mattyboy456 Месяц назад

Atacms is cheap and way more accurate.. Can be easily mass produced.. Pooty's iskander is more expensive and accuracy is not as good as atacms.. Plus, pooty can't produce as many due to budgetary constraints.. He has to focus on producing other equipment too within limited budget.. The US can make endless amount of atacms due to its massive budget..

@tomvlodek6377 Месяц назад

🙄🤡🤭😂

@marcelogidi9623 Месяц назад

Just keep swallowing what US tells you , you are doing great.

@KDY3 Месяц назад

Nato has made Ukraine a testing ground for all its weapon except for jets

@najiv8797 Месяц назад

Because there is not enough air defense in Ukraine. Its make US had no guts to send their best Jet Fighters.. it will end up as metal scraps. And automatically will make a vertical drop for tge price market.