Rwanda, Israel Palestine and the Tories' war on human rights | Shami Chakrabarti interview 

Part of the reason is that a lot of right-wingers are embarrassed to admit that they are right wing, whereas people on the left tend to be proudly so. I think that perhaps people on the extremes of the right realise on some level that their beliefs are anti-humanist. If they are somewhat psychopathic, they do not mind admitting that, but if they have empathy for their in-group it can be difficult for them to square their antipathy for the 'other'.

Far-left/right are now subjective epithets. Every policy or politician is almost always described as righteous when agreed with or Communist/Fascist/Nazi if not. Most of that is almost always an unfair attribution, but those are pretty much the only historic references we think we know. Plus '.... is a .... Fundamentalist' or '... is a Communist/Fascist/Nazi' is the way to get attention/likes/shares/etc.

@@Auriflammethe good thing is the right wing are easy to pick out either through their words or deeds. Both are usually pretty shallow.

The NHS is 100% deemed "far left" just not in the public forum yet

Can't bring entire third world into the U.K.!! Naive lefties!!!

I can’t stick her !

No one's declared War,same in Ukraine,so they're not only immoral but illegal too.

You're welcome to her. I wish she would push off. Human Rights. Kerching. I've NEVER HAD ANY HUMAN RIGHTS. Im now 69 years old and I WAS NEVER ALLOWED BY THE GATEKEEPERS OF THESE THINGS to buy a house for myself to live in despite earning money and paying tax. So where were my Human Rights. I was working . I was prepared to PAY. Yet now all her cohorts talk about "giving" houses. Migrants should be "given" a house. No one ever suggested I should be given a house. In fact if I lost my flat (rented) I'd be out on the street. If the money was in the opposite to HR she'd be signed up the other side,vultures like her follow the money

RBG died at an old age. Jill Stein is alive. Cornell Wilde is alive. They're both running for President.. ..

Tony Abbot alias the London Mad Monk introduced it to Johnston.

Yep, corruption is encouraged and alive and well. More tea, vicar? Tennis anyone?

My recollection of the interview is that Nick Ferrari asked for clarification in the interview and he confirmed for a second time that he thought that cutting off essential utilities was OK.

Saw the interview were Starmer insists that he was not speaking in error. Gaslighting.

​@@zernebock73There's a bew book out: "On Gaslighting", by Kate Abramson, Princeton University Press. I'm thinking of reading it also.

No, no, no. Didn't you hear? He was answering the previous question, he's a massive two Ronnie's fan, that's all it was.

The lord's has many brains have you ever watched a debate?

I predict a tory lab coalition after the next GE, with Labour as the junior partner.

@@therealrobertbirchall I doubt that outcome.

If someone loses then someone will win. I get your point if people vote for Labour because he no longer wants a Conservative Government, but if the Conservatives lose power someone will win power because Government carries on and no specific threshold is needed other than to be the single biggest party in the House of Commons.

@jonathandnicholson are you sure? In Aberdeen there is a Labour Tory coalition local council. Scotland is the place to watch in the GE the SNP have bet the farm on the supreme Court ruling and lost. Labour and the cons will take most of the Scottish seats in the GE between them, casing a hung parliament. Starmer is so desperate foe power he will work with the tories in Westminster. In Scotland there is a Holyrood election in 2005 and again the SNP will be wiped out and their constituencies will be divided among tory a d Labour who will form a coalition in Holyrood to keep the SNP out or from reforming itself.

@@therealrobertbirchall Interesting, but I doubt a Conservative Party - Labour Party coalition.

That's not how fiat currency works

Same argument put by Australia. Animosity to people arriving by boat was huge. Most were ‘economic’ refugees who had relatives already in Aus. These relatives paid the smugglers Also, Australia takes approx 20.000 refugees annually, so the boat people were unfairly taking places of those waiting for yrs in refugee camps

If there’s ever a civil war or natural disaster that devastates the UK British refugees will go to a variety of nations across the world for refuge, as is their legal right. When someone insists on going to Spain because they speak fluent Spanish, or Australia because they have family there, you need to pedantically tell them they must go to France, the nearest safe nation. When the French say they can’t afford millions of British refugees by themselves and the responsibility should be spread around you can tell the French you believe their proximity to the UK means they must take in and accommodate every British refugee. If you can see how silly this suggestion is you can also see how silly the ‘first safe nation’ lie you people tell each other is.

Women are allowed inside mosques 😂

100%

Nope

So you gonna explain how you would solve the issues under discussion.

@@therealrobertbirchall I just did but the censor Nazis dont want a solution.

@@therealrobertbirchall I'm literally not permitted to do so.

She's part of the Vulture Elite. I wonder what her BLOODLINE is,anyone looked into her family tree.

Many of the issues and mounting costs we see today wrt migrants is the governments deliberate effort to prevent the processing of claims and cause a backlog. This causes an enormous backlog which requires them to be housed whilst they await processing. The sooner they are processed, the sooner failed claims are deported.

Just so you know your comment is visible. People of all political stripes and none complain about censorship, however YT's auto-moderation software has no discernible pattern to its shadow banning/ outright deletion of comments. It's very frustrating, but please don't take it personally as the heightened emotion helps no-one.

@LimeyRedneck thanks for the heads up. After you are visited by 77th, it is hard to believe the censorship is not that little bit more personal. The government is passing the blame for mass Chinese style censorship on to the private companies like Google,RU-vid and Facebook ect. Reality is failed ministers like Nick Clegg are moved on into cushy high profile jobs in these companies/institutions and can manifest government/WEF ambitions from within them. If you think the censorship is some, how random or impartial. Then you're a very silly sausage.

@@LimeyRedneck an my response did get randomly removed 🙃