Bruh the RTX 4070 Super takes less heat, makes lower CPU load, has average faster loading speed, higher average performance, and draw less power. It also have a lot of features. Plus, The RX 7800 XT (which the AMD XT suffix equals to NVIDIA Ti suffix) is, of course, HAVE to be better than the RTX 4070 Super since it's performance number is 8, means that it's kind of a high end card, compared to NVIDIA's 7, and the Super rating is of course lower than the TI rating in terms of performance. And don't forget the actual launch MSRP which the RX 7800 XT is $500 and the RTX 4070 Super is $550. Overall, just go with the RTX 4070 Super.
@@ashketchum7061 Not at such low RPM. That's the best thing about the Hellhound. The Nitro+ doesn't run by default at 900-1100 RPM. Watch KitGuruTech review of the Hellhound and you can see that when running noise normalized @40dB the Hellhound runs 6C cooler with a 11C cooler hotspot than the Nitro+. When run default like everyone does the Hellhound is 2-3C cooler and has a 7-8C cooler hotspot. I'm not saying the Nitro+ is loud or worse in any way, just that at the same default settings objectively it doesn't have better temps and noise level than the Hellhound.
Thank you for testing Monster Hunter World! I’m on the fence with getting a 4070 super. But I think I’ll keep my 7800xt. Seeing as world uses 10Gb VRAM I have to prepare for Wilds when it comes out.
It's actually $50 since the launch MSRP (not include inflation, supplies, and stuff) of the RTX 4070 Super is $550 and the RX 7800XT is $500. Overall, the RTX 4070 Super is better because of DLSS, ray tracing and other features, and the performance gap is not much. And don't bring up the "Um, actually, the RX 7800 XT is $400" because $499 is not $400, or the "Um, actually, AMD graphics cards have FSR" because NVIDIA cards can also use FSR somehow. FSR is just cheap DLSS.
4070 super goes braaap whit dls3 and rt performance also lower power use +alot more features for better image but its what you prefer both are best cards of this generation including 7900gre
I was considering an upgrade for my wifes rig. She currently has a 5600x/3070, playing UW 1440p. I think I am sold on the 7800xt, with the possibility of going with the GRE. Great video as always.
3070 > 7800xt? Too much money for such a small upgrade, maybe except you can sell your 3070 for a good price, get a 7800xt good price, 8gb VRAM isn’t enough for the game you are playing.
Nah, 4070 super will be cheaper in the long run. 50 - 60w+ extra usage is quite big. You can recoup the extra money that you spent on a 4070 super instead of a 7800xt with how much money you'll be saving on electricity bill in just a few months. Plus, don't forget about DLSS and FG goodness. Your FPS will sky rocket turning that on.
These video cards are purchased for games in QHD resolution, or for games with reduced graphics settings in 4K. A normal person will not play FHD on such video cards, they are in the wrong price segment and have excessive performance. For QHD and 4K resolutions, the I5 - 12400f processor is not a bottleneck. This is the first. The second thing is that the 7800xt video card really turned out to be very successful with a good amount of video memory. And this video card has a good basis for overclocking. At which it will show even better performance for less money. Personally, I don’t really need new chips from Nvidia. I like to play in real resolution, and not in low resolution, which was stretched to fill the entire screen. The raw performance of the video card is important to me.
I *do* play in 1440P, however I also have a 240Hz monitor and if I was playing a competitive game and the 1080P performance was much much better I, might use 1080P for sure. Some of my friends have 1080P monitors at 180 - 240hz as well, and they are also in the market for this type of card
@@jeremyg9305 Such games have a right to life, I don’t argue. And for such games, of course, the more frames the better. The quality of graphics is not particularly important in them. You can even buy video cards for them cheaper. I meant most people who play AAA games.
@@user-hk8sw3jx7i competitive games are pretty popular, most people playing a AAA shooter like COD or Apex care more about frames than graphics. League, Dota, CS, StarCraft - framerate is king in all these games.
@@jeremyg9305For most of these games, it's easier and cheaper to use other graphics cards. For example 7700xt or 3060ti or 4060ti. 6700xt or 6750xt. Especially in FullHD. Even 1660ti is good for playing Dota 2.
@@jeremyg9305These online games are well optimized and run with a good number of frames on not the latest and most powerful video cards. At the moment I'm talking about heavy AAA blockbusters, single-player games for which a large amount of memory and performance are needed for high screen resolutions.
I sold my rtx 4070 non S, buy this RX 7800 XT I missed those DLSS Frame Gen, but now AFMF is here. with lower temps and less noise. I'm happy with this :)
And those who like ray tracing may remember such an interesting and cool technology from Nvidia - PhysX. This is truly a great technology that Nvidia has been pushing. Now please tell me, in what modern games is it used? And this technology is much more interesting for games than ray tracing.
Ray Tracing is the future. I am happy that nVidia started pushing it. PhysX was a independent project and you needed to buy a PhysX card but nVidia bought it, today CPUs are so strong that there is no need for non CPU physics acceleration. In the other hand even though AMD still didn’t on the level of Ray Tracing as nVidia but they will sooner or later. I am using RT where I can and the image quality if the RT is well implemented could transform the game graphics. Though it is not a must have yet. 5 years and I think RT will be more popular.
@@PeterPaulsNvidia said the same thing about PhysX many years ago. That this is the future. And this technology adds much more realism than Ray tracing. These are destructible environments, great water realism, etc. Yes, and Ray tracing was not invented by Nvidia. It was used long before Nvidia started talking about it.
@@user-hk8sw3jx7i we are talking about real time ray tracing in games. It is the next step for realism. NVidia brought it into gaming still very demanding feature but as I remember my 8600GT wasn’t able to render Physix in Mirror’s Edge because the technology was too demanding, today a 6 core 12 thread CPU is able to render better physics than a videocard back in 2008. Ray Tracing has to mature but as I said that is the future. If ray tracing, especially path tracing will not be the mainstream lighting system we will never reach real realism in gaming. But I’m 100% sure that 8 years from now that will be the standard.
@@user-hk8sw3jx7i this is the point, physics became mainstream and nvidia (and before that ageia) has nothing to do with it… RT already a directX feature so sooner or later gpus will strong enough to run it just like what happened whit phisx.
13th gen can use ddr4 too, but be sure to get the ddr4 mobo first, this days almost all good b660 mobo are gone, the remaining decent option is that gigabyte b660, but im sure it needs that bios update
@@JegsTV , sadly, but it's true. This game is real cpu benchmark.. One of the way is nvidia's "performance panel" with recording by something like OBS studio.
В большинстве игр, за исключением call of duty, 7800xt обошла 4070с лишь благодаря более эффективной работе с процессором на dx12. Был бы здесь проц мощнее 4070с обошла бы в большинстве игр, т.к. она банально мощнее. Имейте это ввиду
Thanks for these benchmarks. Was torn between the 2. I play at 1440p, i dont care for ray tracing, not worth it imo. The 7800xt makes more sense. Similar / better performance, 4gb more Vram, 100 dollars cheaper. AMD won me over this time.
The 7800 xt in this video's has a better cooler than the rtx 4070 S model. So you cant compare them, Also the 7800 xt uses more power so get hotter if you have a model with a bad cooler.
I took 4070s for me, for Itx case it is a must have. But clearly it is was a difficult choice on my build, the cpu was easy to choose xD Nzxt H1 V1 Asus strix B760-I 12400f 32Go DDR5 6000Mhz 4070s 2To nvme 650W 40 decibel on load, pretty ok Your test confirm I did good. I had a 1070 before xD
12400F creates a serious bottleneck on the 7800XT card. You can see it in 4K that there is less load on the processor, in my opinion a more powerful processor will give better results for the 7800XT.
Hello, I have a r5 5600x (no oc), and today I got the rx7800xt from nitro, but I am getting roughly half of your fps in game, for example cyberpunk in fhd im getting low 60s, do you have any idea why I am underperforming?
Make sure ray tracing is off if you want performance like in the video, it still might be somewhat different due to cpu but I wouldn’t expect that big of a difference
You have a bottleneck. You need a better CPU to keep up with the GPU. Another alternative is to play at a higher resolution and graphical settings. I have a 5700x and I still get bottlenecked in CPU intensive games like cyberpunk, Starfield ect. Play at 1440p ultra settings, you will still get a slight bottleneck but it won't be as bad as playing at 1080p. .
@@JegsTV there is no point in trying to take away the importance of ray tracing, nowadays 9 out of 10 games come with ray tracing, companies wanting to stop using lighting and reflections through rasterization and use only ray tracing, soon in the future games will come with native ray tracing, mandatory .
@@TheKlebiN FANBOY HERE WE HAVE A FANBOY HERE!!!!! let me put it simply there is ONLY 1 game that has full RT support and that is Cyberpunk.. and even 4090 runs only 40fps when full RT is on... so yea we are faaar away from RT actually being important.. only thing you should care is FPS/$ and right now and since 20 series Nvidia is not good
With Rt, dlss 3 and frame génération, rtx 4070s is much better than Amd .. rasterisation is not an argument in 2024, only if yoy play cs2 only.. and about random crashing, unstable drivers, bsod for unknow reason and multiples rebooting.. AMD is really late on all this technology!
Dont mind this buffoon. He knows nothing. Just your typical fanboy. Even nvidia cards can consume upto 14gbs of vram on diablo 4. Its the game not the hardware. Heres my test of the 4070ti super with 16gbs of vram ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KctfXrookPs.htmlsi=S1MxV01EM9G827NJ
@@d4nith3 You have no idea what you are talking about. That's not the actual amount of Vram used, it's what the game is alloc... you know what, never mind. I swear these Nvidia fanboys are something else lol.
very strange the 4070 super on all sites beat the 7800xt by a good margin, only on your channel strangely the 7800xt is winning, this is suspiciously sabotaged!
@@alypaches4528 yup, if most of the fanboys that come here use their brain for a second, they would know that both GPUs are bottlenecked by the 12400f causing the 7800xt to have a slight lead on 1080p as its easier for the CPU to keep up on the frames it produces. But hey, get tunnel visioned by your fanboyism and only consider the 4070 super getting outperformed by its rival.
