Which TV Do You like better? Purchase Product In Video On Amazon Or Best Buy LG 43NANO75UPA geni.us/BHVo7D LG 50NANO75UPA geni.us/oTIIJ5p LG 65NANO75UPA geni.us/KpG6wp LG 75NANO75UPA geni.us/u6JmB4 LG 86NANO75UPA geni.us/GlwX Samsung AU8000 43" geni.us/DyNG9CN Samsung AU8000 50" geni.us/wM3NOd Samsung AU8000 55" Soon in USA Samsung AU8000 65" geni.us/0wmo Samsung AU8000 75" geni.us/zACShZQ Samsung AU8000 85" geni.us/8lqRgW Amazon UK Samsung AU8000 43" geni.us/JGa5 Samsung AU8000 55" geni.us/4SU0v Samsung AU8000 65" geni.us/G7g0kK Samsung AU8000 75" geni.us/BwTlvSM LG 50NANO75PA geni.us/nhSHoxk LG 55NANO75PA geni.us/t9fn90 LG 75NANO75PA geni.us/wSkoCXq
Hey Steve, Which TV would you recommend. LG UP75006 or Samsung AU 7172 or the LG NANO756. To play PS5 and watch movies. It's for a bedroom. Simple budget TV. Not the main TV of the house
@@TechSteve update, I ended up getting Samsung over the LG thanks to the link you sent. bought the AU8000 instead of the 7172 that I previously said I would buy
I have the recent 2021 models of Samsung 65” & LG 75”. I enjoy both of them. They were both affordable and great pictures. I prefer Samsung since I had more experience with the Samsung brand.
What type of screen is each of them that you have? I mean, you banned the brand but not the type of TV. LG has LCD-LED, NanoCell and OLED. Samsung has LCD-LED, CrystalClear and QLED.
I love the fact that you do budget TV comparisons and not just the top, hottest models! What I don't like is the widespread use of the "What do you think? Judge for yourself.". That's extremely hard when the picture we see has first gone through your camera, youtube's compression algorithms and got displayed at our often uncalibrated monitors. What you see personally and what we see can be two completely different things. I would much rather hear your first hand impressions, as subjective and biased as they may be, in as much detail as possible. Tell us what you see and not ask as what we see.
At least both TV's are being recorded next to each other so you can actually see a comparison between the two, regardless of any post processing etc thats happening - they're always side by side and the same is happening to both so you are still able to make a comparison.
@@CallagunWindsor this is a very common misconception. Unfortunately, it far from true. I'll give you a few very common examples. You see on the video that the TV 'A' has a bit brigher picture but highlight details are completely missing (sky is almost completely white and featureless). TV 'B' is a bit darker but with beautifully rendered cloudy sky. Which would you prefer? Most would chose B. That could be the right choice or it could be that the TV A has the same level of detail (or more!) and looks much better IRL but either the camera or your monitor didn't have wide enough dynamic range to show those highlights and they got clipped. It's impossible to tell. The same goes for shadow detail. The same goes for colors. A TV that can produce a brigher, more saturated color would paradoxically end up looking worse on the video, with washed out colors, when compared to a TV with dimmer and less saturated color (anyone who knows anything about image processing understands this). The only thing you can relatively confidently judge from the video comparison is which picture is overall brigher. You can't compare contrast, dynamic range, highlight/shadow detail, color accuracy or saturation. You can see the difference in those things on the video but unfortunately there is no way of knowing is the picture you prefer on the video also the one that is better IRL. Due to physical way digital cameras work and how color information gets stored and displayed, it's simply not true that the process will degrade two different screens by the same amount or even in the same way. A good reviewer should do everything he can to point to this fact and emphasis objective measurements or even his subjective impressions. Unfortunately, it's enough that people seem to be happy with what they are getting (they can clearly see the difference!) regardless of the truth. Staying 'objective' and asking people for their opinion seems fair, engaging, respectful and in the process results in more views and more $$$. Unfortunately, what in reality it's not is honest but it's good for business.
@@TechSteve I would prefeer a more biased review too. its hard to gather ones own conclusion when we dont have the tv. from what i saw in the video it seemed like the lg has a deep black, but everyone is talking about it having greyish blacks. but that could be because you had a low brightness. so blacks are black but contrast is shit?
I myself have the LG OLED 48" C1 and it is out of this world. Therefor after also seeing this comparison, I have to go with the LG NanoCell between the two. The brightness and the color is just too superior to pass up in my opinion.
I’m partial to LG but have had multiple TVs from both brands. I find the UI and menus of Samsung TVs to be more intuitive and easier to figure out. I prefer the picture on the LGs I have used, though, and overall liked the looks of the LG in this video over the Samsung, though both looked good. I currently have a 43 inch LG class 75 QNED in my bedroom that is impressing me with its colors, brightness and other good traits. I wish I had discovered the world of QLED, QNED and ULED TVs sooner, though they cost more just a year or two ago.
I 'm really comparing these 2 series panels with sony x80K in this budget friendly selections. As I found OLED level is already overkill for me in normal use. After that I'm now heading to LG Nano77 series. I have Samsung S23 120hz refresh rate mobile and Asus ROG 240hz gaming notebook. This made me feel high refresh rate is just for specific use.
Hi steve. A very useful test would be if the global dimming of backlight (or frame dimming) on led tvs in dark scenes can be disabled on movie and game mode without hdr. It is very distracting in games and movies with dark scenes and subtitles.
I was also comparing similar models but they had the LG 65” on clearance at Target for $450 so I snagged that! We will see how it goes but it’s for light use
I've said it once and I'll say it again; I'm very impressed with that LG! It's a pity that they didn't go with Dolby Vision on it though, then it would be a total no brainer.
Whats the big deal with dolby vision if you dont mind me asking? Its been around for years and i dont get the hype behind it from my experience LG outshines Samsung in everyway possible i wouldnt let dolby vision be a dealbreaker unless i just dont know enough about it
@@ragingrobsta2684 sorry for taking so long to reply. From my uneducated point of view, on my Hisense U7QFTUK (which can reach a peak brightness of 750nits I believe, and has FALD), is that Dolby Vision content looks more natural and believable. HDR content is intended really to shine in tv sets with 1000nit brightness or above (unless you have an OLED, where the near limitless contrast helps out a little here). Tvs with lower peak brightness, like budget tvs who have peak brightness of 200-400 nits usually, will end up clipping a lot of the details in HDR 10 content. The Dolby Vision metadata interacts with your tv and makes picture setting adjustments in every scene to make the very most out of what your tv has to offer. It eeks out an extra 10-20% in picture quality I feel, and when you're on a budget, than can mean a lot with a tv that has limitations.
@@ragingrobsta2684 lg panels are terrible. These dreadful ips panels make blacks look grey. Even the nano cell tvs are awfull. The only lg tv I would buy would be the awsome oled tvs which in my opinion are king of the tvs.
I recently bought the LG NANO75. I dont know how to describe this. My initial impression was amazing. Like, this is a TV worth buying. But after days of using it. I realised that when playing games and you're in a dark place, its hard to see. So, I increased the backlight brightness and Contrast. But whenever it reaches maximum, it looks great but my eyes hurt. So I reduce it to 85 percent, barely see anything but my eyes is fine. I don't know. Not sure if the tv is not supposed to be on the level of brightness or its a problem of my eye. Which is a shame, cos I like this TV.
That is a IPS panel. I know your pain my friend. I suffered from this from years. Nice natural colors, great viewing angles but... the dreaded "milky blacks". Reviewers should talk more about that. I really don't understand how some people is ok with that.
Hey Steve you are my man! helping our family so much with your work. So the LG nano 50" will have a VA panel? If so would you say that would be better?
I bought the 50 inch LG Nano75 a month ago. What bothers me the most is the amount of reflections on the screen. It is really bothersome on dark scenes, where I can see my household objects reflected on the screen. Even at nighttime with few lights on, the reflections on the screen are quite prominent. Is this an issue with the AU8000 as well?
I just bought the au8000 and the deciding factor over the nano 75 was the reflections on the LG. It seemed a big difference when examining them in the store
The AU8000 model in Brazil can totally display 1440p. Already tested. The brazilian model also have ambient mode and analog rca inputs. Don't know why they make this diferences.
My man you are so underrated. Thanks for the tv i been watching lately and really appreciate all the information. Really which you would let me know which you would take if you can only take one.
I had the LG 75NANO80 ($1799 CND) for almost a month and the one thing I couldn't get over was the blooming in dark scenes. I decided to return it for a more expensive QN85Q70 ($2800 CND). Once I had it setup, my wife and I immediately saw the difference in picture quality. The images from the Q70 produced was softer and natural to the eyes. It wasn't straineous to naked eye like the 75Nano80. My wife complained that the LG was too bright and was painful to watch bright and colorful scenes. I couldn't get over the blooming. On the Q70, the blooming was all but eliminated and reflection was reduced thanks to the anti reflective coating. The one good thing about the Q70 is the stand, it can fit onto any size table ( I don't understand why other companies don't offer middle stands with large screens). Anyway, I recommend the Q70 if you don't want blooming, for the extra money I think it's worth it especially when your staring into a massive screen watching any content. I think QLED is the more superior due to the VA panel and the duel LED. The Titan software is more responsive that the LG WebOS but I really like the LG magic remote ( reminds me of the Nintendo Wiimote), then the Samsung (more physical buttons are a plus in my books). My advice is to spend time (within your 30 days to return policy) with family and nitpick the tv. Watch your favorite tv shows/ movies and games but test smaller screens tv's to test and return then like myself who started with a 75" then went to 85".
I got the 75 samsung ultra UHD but I feel my LG nanocell is so good 65 inch That I feel reluctant to change it for samsung.. Also samsung has in my house like lots So yes I might put the LG SINCE its smaller to watch or play near my bed and the big one samsung in lounge That's I think most reasonable
Steve Welcome Back! Been a Hometheater enthusiast since 1995. Looking to get another TV love my Sony and Vizio. Was thinking Nanocell 90 (2021) or... I know it's a deal to good to be true a A1 OLED. Your input would e great. OLED A1 is definitely a good price but again you get what you pay for . Plus the Burn In to much of a turn off. Thanks in Advance 🤝 hope you and your are Safe and Healthy.
I wanna know the same thing! Whenever the screen is black or watching a wide screen movie, I can see white spots around the edges of the TV. I was wondering if I had a defect on my tv
Okay i think you didnt mentioned the most important part... of the video. Which is the most durable of the two... im my experience i always go for samsung because of its look and its brightness and for gaming purposes. However samsung is good for maximum of 2 yrs with heavy using.. then you will see the picture burns on the screen.. either there will be shadow frame on the screen or a map shadow when its dark scene already.. so i decided to buy lg for now.. because according to the sales rep. That i ask lg is much heavy duty and it has 2 yrs warranty than samsung.. this is from my country.. the warranty. I dont know in different countries So thats why i pick lg over samsung. Due to its warranty and hopefully it will not burn sooner..
couple of months ago I wanted to buy the LG Nano then in the shop I saw the AU8072 in the same TV Store. I have changed my mind. I have no regrets. I wrote this at 00:01 . I'll be coming back with another comment after the video. p.s. Thanks for uploading exactly what I missed on RU-vid a h2h comparison between these two models.
I think the Sony will have better colors and the Samsung will have a smother picture for motion. I like the Android or Google TV that the sony has as well
Great video, just bought a samsung au8100 to replace my LG. I do feel the need to warn potential LG customers, LG back lights turn blue after 2 years due to poor quality back lights used. Usually LGs warranty expires after the second year.
I wonder if its a panel lottery thing with the Samsung because the tv seems to have issues... I'm not use to seeing the blacks so crushed and dark. I wonder if this unit is defective??
It depends on the content and settings. I use 4K on every in the videos so they will look better then playing 1080p from cable boxes or older 8bit consoles.
@@TechSteve You did a great review! I've said before that these are the important type reviews that you need to and have been doing. Its about the consumer that needs these comparisons. I'm a Samsung guy but the LG was looking really good!
which has the better converter? in Aus we have a lot of HD channel and not very many UHD channels which is better for this issue, i noticed with another UHD tv i had TCL it looked terrible.
Because of using a VA panel on the 50" lg, I passed on this model. Reason? It flushed out quickly when changing viewing angles as compared to the 43" lg of the same model which uses an IPS panel. Very disappointed here because I wanted a 50" model and thought both had the same panel, as I favor IPS panels.
I have LG nanocell series75 75” & Samsung crystal au8000 85”. Can’t figure out which one to put in the living room or family room. Also on which Tv should I connect the ps5 & Xbox x, one console on each Tv. I also have a Nintendo switch Oled an need help on buying a 50”-55” Tv no more than $500 to run the switch oled.
I’ve had 8 Samsung TV’s of varsity types including my last 4K Q7F and had a 1080 p 900 series both 75 Inch.I recently purchased this QN800 8K in 85 inch.I can only say that I don’t know yet if I have A bad one but it is The Worst TV I’ve ever had.The panel itself is slightly bent.The one connect box input for IO Optical cable will not lock on the lead and keeps coming loose.Not that bothered about that as I’m changing to EARC HDMI.The picture quality on a lot of media looks like Standard Definitely.You can’t tell much different between SD and HD.4K HDR is absolutely dreadful the dark scenes are to black and the bright scenes are blindingly bright.The overall picture looks blurry and really not sharp.Brights scenes are washed out.Really poor overall picture quality.Don’t tell me to change settings as I knew all about the complete menu on this TV before purchasing and have spent hours and hours trying to achieve a good picture.I do a lot of pro editing and have had cinema rooms and AV equipment for decades so I can say I haven’t missed anything.I purchased new HDMI 2.1 cables and the tv is connected to the Internet via a cat 8 cable with a very strong signal.I cannot believe that this TV could be so bad.My last 4K set is in my storerooms and I think it’s coming back.I’m going to the store to try and change this TV for something else.Over €5400 Euros waisted.Plus the fitting and a new wall bracket and disruption.
Sorry but they don't sell this model where I live. You will have to do your own research on this one or Try Display Specification Website and see if the specs are on there.
Hi Steve well it looks like the are similar to each other in so many way which one you prefer for home tv (movies , series that stuff) no for gaming UA65AU8000 vs LG 64nano756pa ?
In my Full sRGB monitor samsung au 8000 color looks very natural compared to LG which is a bit saturated or more colorful during the initial comparison at 5:29. Does crystal UHD AU 8000 has wide color gamut like QLED TVs?
@@bilalsabur I really like it. Colours and picture quality is really good. Blue is insanely vibrant. The only negative is, tizen store. Hasn't got much on offer and a lack of third party apps as Tizen isn't that popular. Doesn't matter because I have a formular Z8 box connected
Maaaan. I bought the 43” LG Nano 75 from Best Buy and right out of the box it had 2 big cracks in the display. 🤦🏻 I had to take it back. They almost made me eat it cos the box wasn’t damaged. Tried blaming me. Now I’m scared to buy another one lol
I’m about to buy the LG nano cell 75 70 inch but can’t tell if it’s IPS or VA… I heard somewhere it’s VA but I need IPS for my wife seating arrangement
Подскажите, пожалуйста, Вы рекомендуете LG 50 Nano756 с матрицей VA к покупке? Какой уровень яркости и контрастности. Не могу найти информацию. Спасибо. Can you please tell me if you recommend LG 50 Nano756 with VA matrix for purchase? What is the level of brightness and contrast. I can't find information. Thanks.
Bought the AU8000 the sound quality is terrible. The interface is extremely laggy out the box. Its picture quality is beautiful but so is LGs id honestly recommend an LG anyday being someone who has owned and tried both
We purchased Samsung LED six months back. In last month LED panel replaced twice. Samsung has so many issue. Samsung is not ready to replace full set considering two times issues back to back in a month. Don't buy Samsung.
Sorry but they don't sell this model where I live. You will have to do your own research on this one or Try Display Specification Website and see if the specs are on there. AU8100 www.samsung.com/levant/tvs/uhd-4k-tv/au8100-crystal-uhd-4k-smart-tv-2021-50-inch-ua50au8100uxtw/ UP8150 webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:NfTB8m-gwJoJ:www.lg.com/eg_en/tvs/lg-55up8150pvb+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
@@coreyfowler3395 LG better than the Samsung in terms of which comparisons? I currently have the LG that Steve here did the video of but I feel like the blacks are washed out/milky. You find any of that in the Samsung tv?
I love the colors on the LG but how’s the contrast for you during dark settings? I went with the LG but I’m finding the blacks are really washed out for me.
