I remember the black child hadith, our famous super intellectual Pakistani athiest made fun of it saying "this is bs haha , there is no chance that a man could have a darker skin child if parents have light skin" and his own fans schooled him on recessive allele and showed him that it is indeed possible and not that rare, it was such a shame for him. Like he is so dumb that he didn't knew about recessive allele but an 7th century man knew it better. He humiliated himself with his own mockery.
@D M khan No, we must confront their nonesense head-on and try to show them it's nonesense until they realise it or atleast the people around us realise it.
Please brother Hijab consider this as well : I’m a postgraduate medical student and I’m planning to major in gyn&ob , and while I was reading about sex determination of the baby and its factors I came across a research that brought to my mind this Hadith in particular and it was rather FASCINATING ! , the phraseology in one narration is “ إن علا ماء الرجل على ماء المرأة كان ذكرا بإذن الله، وإن علا ماء المرأة على ماء الرجل كان أنثى بإذن الله “ . And the research in question concluded that Alkaline environment favors the selection of Y chromosome generally hence it increases the probability of having a boy and vice versa the acidic environment favors X chromosomes hence it’s highly probable to have a girl , and it’s known to lay people not to mention medical students that MALE EJACULATE is Alkaline FEMALE EJACULATE is Acidic So in the light of this prophetic narration it makes absolutely scientific sense and it’s not even problematic from a scientific pov ! . I’m not trying to prove religion using science , I’m fully convinced of your stance on this matter Br.Hijab , All I’m saying is that this narration is NOT EVEN PROBLEMATIC ! May Allah reward you for all your work Br.Hijab and all the people behind the scenes . NB: anyone please , feel free to correct me if you find sth wrong in my comment .
ma sha Allah brother i wish i could also study medical science but i think it was a bit tough for me . how ever may Allah grant you success in life . have a good time brother ❤️
Yes Ahmed, there 2 hadiths variations. One is resemblance and the other is sex of the child. Notice How the prophet couldve said if the male's content dominate, it could've been a "female" not a male. But we know from science that if a males content dominate a.k.a his y chromosome, we know for a fact that it can never be a female. So the prophet is actually correct about the first part of the hadith. Now the second part, if the female's content dominate, there ongoing researches and proven researches that mention that a female's body if controlled to a certain extent, a.k.a her ph, then the child could favour either a male or a female. For example, if the woman has a certain PH she will favour the x chromosome from the father and this the child will be a female. And the vice verse could happen.
What a video! Beautifully explained from all angles MashAllah, and also we got to taste the prophet Muhammad pbuh emotional intelligence and how to not shun a questionnaire when they have a question 😊
I've actually long misunderstood this Hadith Subhan'Allah-I need to learn to learn Arabic ASAP Insha'Allah lol.. Jazak'Allah khair Mohammed Hijab, may Allah reward u for ur efforts ya habib
Thank you, Mohammed hijab, for that explanation. The colonialists love to jump on anything that sounds vaguely unidentifiable. And Always act like they have an ( I gotcha) moments. I am grateful that I have found you to give us good insights about islam.
May allah reward you Ameen it is very beneficial for Muslims all around the world who necessarily are consumed by these kinds of statements given by the non believers in hopes to make believers left in confusion , jazakallah khayran truly from bottom of my heart
The previous video of "Sun setting in Muddy water" explaination he talked soo fast it was like he was on fast forward mode. Alhamdulilah this video is much slower and it flows nicely.
Because he was there right? Hadith weren't written until hundreds of years after the prophet. You cant take this as canon, those who do fall in the trap of traditionalism, but whose traditions? Forefathers.. the Quran instructs against this behaviour. "Which hadith after this (Quran) will you believe in?"
@@c5quared626 LOL, Again a stupid "quranist"(probably a disguised liberal) who have no idea how Quran itself was preserved and how much Quran commands us to follow the way of the Prophet(saws), follow his sayings, practices, teachings, living style, etc and accepting what the main body of Ummah has consensus upon as Quran repeatedly ordered. And you here with less knowledge intermixing the linguistic term "Hadith" used in Quran with the terminology of science of Preservation of Quran and Sunnah which came at the time of Sahaba & taba'in(means later generation) and they are two very *different* things. This important knowledge was passed generation to generation through authentic, most trustworthy and renowned scholars who were literally the students of Prophet(saws) himself, the noble companions of Prophet, then Khair ut taba'in, taba-tabain; and in between too they themselves preserved knowledge by writing down their own many "mushaf"- works which are still preserved but they were more famous and great at oral traditions bcz they were world famous for it and were exceptional, they spend their whole of their lives to preserve the knowledge of Islam until next generation scholars(whose hadiths collections are very famous today) who literally learned from those previous generations only, where Allah made "papers" more accesible and common under early abbasid caliphate who brought it from China, now they decided to write down, organize & save every authentic, unauthentic most reliable knowledge they've preserved till then coz it was necessary for whole of Ummah to have access to it as per the Quran's commandments, so the Ummah doesn't get deviated from the path of the Prophet(Saws), His proper interpretations of Quran, events of revelations of Quran, understaning of Salaf as-saliheen, rulings that Prophet(saws) and Khulfa e Rashideen preached, etc. and so the "Science of the ahadith" came into play - they saved work with all the chains of transmissions to distinguish between authentic, unauthentic, weak, strong, fabricated,etc. chains; and all those transmitter's much of the data like lifes, events, meetings, testimonies, etc. is known to us even today, in the works like Asma ul rijaal. We can still verify and testify the authenticity of Ahadith which goes back to the blessed lips of our beloved prophet(saws), in a similar way Allah preserved the Qira'at of Qur'an except it's way more precise and accurate.
@@mdfahd24 Allah mentions a few things in the Quran to have Iman in. This hadith is not one of them. End of discussion. I would say taking hadith like this with Iman would mean I'm placing Iman in Muhammad Hijab and You. The Quran mentions this shirk trap at length. Read it carefully. Inshallah
Allahomma barik, this really shows the weak arguments the anti Islam carry against our deen, to the point that, how embarrassing it would be for a muslim to really be effected of their shubuhat. May ALLAH protect all muslims.
I’m still trying to make sense of this Hadith, What kind of fluid is the Hadith referring to for females if it’s not ejacualtion? Because I’m not aware of any genes being found in any female fluids.
I think u haven't the watched the video then , Muhammad hijab in the very beginning explained the word "ejaculation or fluid" is nowhere to be find in the Arabic text. The hadith is "whoever dominates" , and yeah the nature(acidic or basic) do influence the gender of the kid. Even if u take the hadith in the context of "sex" instead of "looks" and in the context of fluid or ejaculation, it will suit that too bcz of the below mentioned article, but bcz this hadith doesn't mention "ejaculation or fluid" so we are nowhere bound to follow this interpretation , Mohammed hijab chose the "whoever dominates ( in genes )" narrative bcz of the other hadith where prophet explained the recessive allele thing to that sahabi, pointing towards the fact that he was talking about genes not necessarily of ejaculation. www.healthline.com/health/fertility/how-to-have-a-boy#medical-interventions.
The individuals accusing Mohammad Hijab of "acrobatics," clearly have a very rigid, unrefined, and unsophisticated conception of linguistic anthropology, and their expectations are unjustified and absurd. To them, unless the Prophet (pbuh) had stated "The child acquires phenotype characteristics as a result of alleles, which are variants of genes from both parents. Certain traits are dominant, thus, they will determine the phenotype characteristics of the child, come back next week so I can tell you about the concepts of homozygous and heterozygous genes," then it cannot speak about genetics. The Prophet, obviously, will speak to people in a language that reflects the time, environment, cultural ethos, and understanding of the people. The term "fluid" will encompass sperm, egg, and genes in totality within that understanding. The Prophet has stated that " I am blessed with the ability to speak the least that is imbued with the greatest level of meaning." I am paraphrasing, but yes we are perfectly justified to interpret Hadiths and Qur'an with the change of knowledge. To not do that is itself absurd and uncalled for. Mohammad Hijab is not the only one to draw this conclusion. Jamal Badawi was presented with this hadith who read it in an impromptu manner and he also stated that "the word used is DOMINATE" and not "first."
It is clearly acrobatics. It is not the water that dominates, but the genes encoded in the DNA. No matter how much twisting you do, it is still wrong and unscientfic. Only those desperate to defend Islam will believe this is explanation from Hijab is true. The rest will just laugh at the silliness of it all. نَزَعَ literally means Disarmament. In the context it means - to discard, to extract, to pull out, to remove, to strip, to take off, to throw off, to unhook, to unplug, to wrench, to peel off. You have to do back flips to make it mean dominant. Sad.
@@ummerfarooq5383 That was Arabic from the hadith. It wasn't Greek. If you can't tell the difference, then that might be your problem. نَزَعَ is naze. If you can find the meaning of "dominant" in any Arabic to English dictionary, please share it with me.
@@bringemyoungpbuh4123 sabaqa can also mean dominate. for example you can say sabaq in terms of a horse winning on a race. Cry us a river some where else
The more common narration of this hadith says resemblance is determined by whether the man or woman's maa (water i.e. Semen) sabaqa (precedes, as in winning a race) the other rather than 'ala (on, upon) the other. This exact idea is found also in the Talmud: "If the woman emits her semen first she bears a male child; if the man emits his semen first she bears a female child;"
But the authentic hadith deals with resemblance, not sex. The male/female version was actually called into question by Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Al Qayyim. It's possible that an Israeliyat was mixed in
It looks like the opposite in Talmud first of all. Secondly the version you talked about can be interpreted differently. Thirdly the Hadith talks about resemblance not necessarily gender. The similarity with Talmud isn’t actually that much. Such similarity can easily be a result of coincidence.
Series should be called: "Man attempts to reconcile medieval folk beliefs with modern science". Hijab, the thinking man that he is, will one day realise the futility of such an exercise, if, deep down, he hasn't already.
@Joker there is no "First" Mentioned in the Hadith. I'll save both of our time. Read about it in details here. www.google.com/amp/s/qurananswers.me/2017/08/26/gender-determination-hadith/amp/ And please which come first the word 'genetics' or the Hadith?. You sound very intelligent btw.
I know this isn't exactly in the "doubts / specious claims" category, but could you please do a video on what khimar really means and meant at the time the 24:31 verse was revealed? You seem to be really good at researching original sources, and I constantly find conflicting claims that khimar only means general covering vs head-specific covering. Also 24:31 doesn't seem to command wearing khimars; rather it clearly commands covering the chest area. Would really appreciate your insight on this if you get a chance.
Even if the prophet meant what THE anti islamist says, I dont really dont know why it matters? The prophet is a Messenger of God that were given THE Quran along with religious guiding, but he were just a man, not a scientist.
It doesn't at all mean who ejaculates first determines the gender. Its about which parents' genes dominate over the other and about parent deciding gender by xx chromosome or xy chromosomes
The whole premise of Br Hamza Tzortzis creating the Sapience channel was to disassociate the predominant mentality of Muslims reading between the lines and trying to create an artificial association between Islam and science. But lately Br. Hijab is trying to do the same old Islam & science thing by trying to validate hadith with science. When you people have clearly explained it is a flawed methodology, why go back and do the same science-Islam exercise?
You misunderstood it probably. 1)observation and theories of science are different. 2)mh isnt trying to show islam is true with science. He is showing hadith isnt in conflict in this particular case (an observation)
@@propheticguidance7842 by trying to show that the particular hadith isn't in conflict with science he is essentially giving importance to the phenomenon of juxtaposing Islam and science. It is nothing but trying to validate the hadith by using science as a crutch or touchstone. I mean why should science even be brought into the picture? Why try to give some credence to the hadith by saying its not in conflict with science.
@@incognittooo No, you’ve misunderstood the approach. Mohammed Hijab is trying to show that the Quran speaks of these issues in a way that conforms to 7th century understanding and 21st century understand. The language is vague enough that allows for this scope of interpretation. in this case he is showing 1) that the Hadith is mistranslated and 2) When translated properly he shows the understanding one can get from this Hadith from a scientific perspective. He admits that it may have been understood differently back then but the language is such that it could be in line with science as well.
Hamza Tzortzis is a philosophy student. He doesn't study the many subjects of hard science. But that doesn't mean those who are studying their peculiar hard subject be denied of the Quran. They should hear it five times a day. Inshaallah. They should not be controlled by atheists who wish to turn them into cheap lab slave labour.
@@ummerfarooq5383 In the attempts to validate Quran and Hadith with science or even associating Science with islam has done more harm than good. I mean the whole Bucaillism was OK until a certain time, but now it is backfiring heavily. Its about time we stop using science to show hadith or quran being in conformity with modern science. Then people will start questioning all the erroneous alluding we did wrt. embryology, cosmology etc.
How to answer the Atheistic point that Richard Dawkins often make that: "you are Muslim becayse you were born in a Muslim country, if you were born in India you have been Hindu... Etc"?
We live in different countries, social atmospheres, regions etc. We all have free will and the ability to think for ourselves. If you are born in a Muslim country it doesn’t mean that you will become Muslim automatically. However , you will be more exposed to Islam and therefore take interest in it and practice it. Dawkins is subjective, just like everyone else. The best thing would be to look things objectively and seek the truth. How come that he is an atheist and not a Christian? He was born and brought up in a Christian household. The same argument can be given - you are only atheist as you were born in a Christian country as most atheists are from Christian countries (especially in the west). Or the Chinese are atheist because they were born in China - therefore their belief is wrong. The arguments are invalid but it may have some truth in that as you are more exposed to the religion. A convert could say - if it was not for the internet or this time and age (due to exposure of Islam), I would not have become Muslim. Just because you are something does not mean your beliefs are wrong. If you let’s say were born in India and was a Hindu, you still have the freedom to think as objectively as possible and change religion. Same way ideas and theories can be changed based on experience, knowledge and other factors.
I'm not convinced even if the hadith is proved to be 100% sahih that anything scientific is meant by it. It could be just common sense and observation. But how may cases are there of recessive genes, many generations old suddenly appearing ? It must be an extremely rare case. In any case, the child would still resemble the mother and father in some way , e.g. ears, nose , lips etc. The hadith does not mention this? When the Qur'aan does speak of genetics, we have the verse '..created He, the two of a pair, the male and the female from a drop of sperm...' Scientifically this is linked to XX and XY, thus the Qur'aan maintains what is know through science today, gender is determined by the male sperm cell.
If you said the Arabic word used doesn't refer to discharge, so help me answer the following: Did Muhammad at the time spoke the right Arabic word when giving the answer? if yes than would you consider that it was a wrong translation collected by those who eventually wrote the Hadith? [this will open the danger of having a contradiction which Surah 4:82 goes against] if however you say Muhammad spoke the word which means ejaculation ... than ...did Gabriel gave the wrong revelation to Muhammad? or Shaitan interrupted the revelation [Surah 22:52] and Allah eradicated
None. He clearly said it was the fact that the Arabs at the time understood it that way even though there is another word for ejaculation used multiple times in the Qur’an and Ahadith. Unlike English, there are more words in Arabic that mean something specific, depending on the context since Arabic is a very high-context language.
Please explain this hadith Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 537 : Narrated by Abu Huraira The Prophet said "If a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease."
Assalamu alaikum, I think this is a good explanation for the hadith. www.reddit.com/r/MuslimsRespond/comments/8l1e9n/the_if_a_house_fly_falls_in_the_drinkhe_should/
There has been shown that flies have anti poison on them, since they tend to be around dirt so much, ALLAH gave them poison and anti poison, that's why they survive aswell
@@philipcoriolis6614 idiot if u mix those two, it wont have an harm on you, since u getting the disease and its cure at the same time, is almost comparable to an injection, where they inject a disease and the cure at the same time, you will be fine, you low intelligent understanding of a human
This was on EF dawah stream where Dr imran explained very well also you forgot to mention how did the prophet know that women contribute to the genetics of a child? Which wasn't even known in those times anywhere in the world
How was it known that woman conributed to the genetics of the child? Common sense and observation.....because there were children who resembled their mother or maternal relatives in looks....
Voilà un autre Hadith dans le même sens que celui qui est discuté ici : Ummu Sulaym vint trouver le Prophète, que Dieu le bénisse et le salue, et lui dit : "Messager de Dieu, Dieu n'a pas honte par rapport à ce qui est vrai ! La femme doit-elle faire les grandes ablutions si elle voit un rêve érotique ?" : "عن زينب بنت أبي سلمة، عن أم سلمة قالت: جاءت أم سليم إلى النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم فقالت: "يا رسول الله، إن الله لا يستحيي من الحق، فهل على المرأة من غسل إذا احتلمت؟". Aïcha* dit alors : "Ummu Sulaym, tu as déshonoré les femmes ! Que tes mains soient dans la terre !" : "فقالت عائشة: "يا أم سليم، فضحت النساء، تربت يمينك" (Muslim, 310/29). Le Prophète dit à Aïcha : "Laisse-la. Plutôt, toi, que tes mains soient dans la terre !" : "فقال لعائشة: "بل أنت، فتربت يمينك" (Muslim, 310/29) / "دعيها" (Muslim, 314). Puis il dit à Ummu Sulaym : "فقال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: "نعم، إذا رأت الماء" : "Si (à son réveil) cette femme trouve du liquide, alors : oui." Ummu Salama** dit alors : "Messager de Dieu, cela se produirait-il ? La femme aussi émettrait-elle du liquide ?" : "وهل يكون هذا؟" (Muslim n° 311) / "يا رسول الله، وتحتلم المرأة؟" (Muslim n° 313). Le Prophète lui répondit : "Oui. Sinon d'où proviendrait la ressemblance (de l'enfant avec sa mère) ? Le liquide masculin est épais et blanchâtre, et celui de la femme est fluet et jaunâtre. Si le liquide de la femme domine celui de l'homme, l'enfant ressemble à ses oncles maternels. Et si le liquide de l'homme domine son liquide, l'enfant ressemble à ses oncles paternels" : "نعم، فمن أين يكون الشبه؟ إن ماء الرجل غليظ أبيض، وماء المرأة رقيق أصفر؛ فمن أيهما علا أو سبق، يكون منه الشبه" (Muslim n° 311) / "وهل يكون الشبه إلا من قبل ذلك؟ إذا علا ماؤها ماء الرجل، أشبه الولد أخواله؛ وإذا علا ماء الرجل ماءها، أشبه أعمامه" (Muslim n° 314). Le problème n’est pas seulement dans le sens à donner au mot "سَبَقَ". Même en supposant qu’il signifie “dominer” au sens génétique du terme, ici il est bien dit que si le sperme de l’homme… et les caractéristiques du sperme ont bien été données. Désolé mais le concept de dominance ne s’applique pas à un liquide mais aux allèles d’un gène. Par ailleurs, Il est difficile de prédire exactement à quoi un enfant ressemblera en fonction de ses gènes hérités de ses parents, car la manière dont ces gènes s'expriment est complexe et influencée par des facteurs environnementaux. Peut-être qu’au fond la cause qu’il défend est juste mais visiblement les arguments qu’il utilise ne sont pas les bons.
Try this topic, "Sapient Thoughts #21: Has the Quran been distorted multiple times, verses gone forever because of a sheep and because Muslims didn't recite them enough? Btw I love these vids, not trying to hate, but I think that the preservation of the quran problem is unsolvable. It has not at all been perfectly preserved.
@The Visiting Soul "As a Christian you must believe in it by nessecity aswell. Such as Adams rulings being different then Moses and Jesus. " What? I must believe in the Quran? I'm confused. The fact is that the quran has not been perfectly preserved, just ask Yasir Quadi. According to Abu Musa, Momos companion, chapters of the quran were lost because Muslims didn't recite them enough. Sahih Muslim 2286. Now, why would a fellow Muslim make this up? Ubayy ibn Ka'b, states, Abu Ubaid, Kitab Fada'il-al-quran, that there are hundreds of verses missing from the Quran. Why would another companion of Momo make this up? Momos top reciters couldn't even agree on which verse should be in the quran. (ibn abi dawud, kitab al-masahif). In case you were wondering why even Yasir Quadi thinks perfect preservation is ridiculous, that's why.
@Ahmed Yusof Ok, so what you said addresses one of my points only. You haven't even bothered to quote the other two so as of now the Quran hasn't been perfectly preserved. Oh, and you want me to take a class from Muslim scholars? Ok, how about famous Muslim scholar Yasir Quadi? "The standard narrative has holes in it." "This should not be discussed among the masses, it's not wise". Umm, thanks? Now to address your point, "Umar bin al-Khattab asked about a verse of Allah’s book, they answered: ‘It was with a man who got killed on day of Yamama (battle)’. He (Umar) said: ‘We all shall return to Allah’. Then he ordered to collect the Quran, therefore he was the first one who collected it in one book.” (Kanz ul Ummal, Volume 2, p. 574) And: Umar was once looking for the text of a specific verse of the Qur’an he vaguely remembered. To his deep sorrow, he discovered that the only person who had any record of that verse had been killed in the battle of Yamama and that the verse was consequently lost. (Ibn Abi Dawud, Kitab al-Masahif, p. 10 - see also as-Suyuti’s al-Itqan fi ‘ulum al-Quran, volume 1, p. 204) " This addresses your point because even if scholars supposedly agreed on Uthman's quran (which they didn't but I don't feel like debunking), then they agreed that verses had still been lost forever. Soooo, Muslim scholars also are telling me that verses of the Quran are lost forever!? Because Muslims died in war?? Sweet, now I'm even more far from Islam. Good advice. Oh, and btw, they're hundreds of more examples of Muslim apologists saying verses have been lost, but I wouldn't want to spam up this chat.
@Ahmed Yusof Ohhh, by abrogation, that was your way of explaining why we have chapters and verses missing from the Quran. "Pay attention the verses Were abrogated In the life of the prophet (Saw) but there were times where People dind’t know. The sahaba told Them and then they left those verses." So, there was the eternal speech of allah, then the companions of mohhamed said, or mohamned said, "Hey, you know that thing in the quran? Well, it's stupid, and let's remove it take it back. Let's abrogate it. I think no one saw it, so we're cool." Cool prophet, and cool holy book. Sounds like early muslims wasn't even sure what should and shouldn't be in the eternal speech of allah, or what should be removed and "abrogated". I'm not agreeing that everyone agreed on the quran from uthman, but I am taking your claim, taking it for a test drive, and look where we got lol. So the quran momo preached, not all of it is here because the companions of momo said so. I could go on refuting that the companions of the quran agreed on the one by uthman, but I don't care because you admitted the verses from the quran, the eternal speech of allah has been 'abrogated'. Thanks, we agree friend :)
@Ahmed Yusof Lol, nice excuse to get out of having to refute what I said. The fact is, you agreed that verses and chapters of the Quran are lost, but you spend your time making excuses for this. Like the companions said it was ok, therefore it is ok. I pointed out this is ridiculous, then you left the conversation. May Jesus open your heart to the truth. All Islam has to stand on is the quran, and how could this be the eternal speech of allah, with no errors, when allah couldn't even preserve that original narrative? Jesus died on the cross for you, don't you know?
Please provide with references when giving proof I think that is very important, especially with videos like these. The first hadith which found talking about this is the following; Umm Salama told how Umm Sulaim said, "Messenger of God, God is not ashamed of the truth. Is any washing necessary for a woman when she has a sexual dream?” He replied, "Yes, when she sees signs of liquid.” Umm Salama then covered her face and said, "Messenger of God, does a woman have sexual dreams?” He replied, "Of course she does. In what way does her child resemble her?” (Bukhari and Muslim.) Muslim added in the version of Umm Sulaim, "The man’s liquid is coarse and white, the woman’s fine and yellow, so the resemblance comes from the one which prevails or comes first.” sunnah.com/mishkat:433, also see sunnah.com/ibnmajah/1/334 This talks about a women’s liquid being fine and yellow - which determines the resemblance. Genes are not “fine and yellow” and they are definitely not dissimilar depending on gender. Also the other hadith with the camels is hasan and it contradicts the first hadith. If the first preposition is that the dominate gene gets expressed, then there is no possibility for a recessive (or ancestral gene) to be expressed in order to resemble a child. Even if the hadith talked about genes, it is inconsistent with modern knowledge of genetics.
Don't say if. Hadith حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، وَابْنُ، نُمَيْرٍ قَالاَ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ إِدْرِيسَ، عَنْ رَبِيعَةَ بْنِ عُثْمَانَ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ يَحْيَى بْنِ حَبَّانَ، عَنِ الأَعْرَجِ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم الْمُؤْمِنُ الْقَوِيُّ خَيْرٌ وَأَحَبُّ إِلَى اللَّهِ مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنِ الضَّعِيفِ وَفِي كُلٍّ خَيْرٌ احْرِصْ عَلَى مَا يَنْفَعُكَ وَاسْتَعِنْ بِاللَّهِ وَلاَ تَعْجِزْ وَإِنْ أَصَابَكَ شَىْءٌ فَلاَ تَقُلْ لَوْ أَنِّي فَعَلْتُ كَانَ كَذَا وَكَذَا . وَلَكِنْ قُلْ قَدَرُ اللَّهِ وَمَا شَاءَ فَعَلَ فَإِنَّ لَوْ تَفْتَحُ عَمَلَ الشَّيْطَانِ " Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying: A strong believer is better and is more lovable to Allah than a weak believer, and there is good in everyone, (but) cherish that which gives you benefit (in the Hereafter) and seek help from Allah and do not lose heart, and if anything (in the form of trouble) comes to you, don't say: If I had not done that, it would not have happened so and so, but say: Allah did that what He had ordained to do and your" if" opens the (gate) for the Satan. Sahih Muslim 2664 In-book : Book 46, Hadith 52 USC-MSA web (English) : Book 33, Hadith 6441 (deprecated) Sahih Muslim Get Hadith Collection (All in one) App: #GreentechApps #Hadith Anyone who knows how, knows one need to give the woman an orgasm before females are born. Stress only gives birth to males. It doesn't matter how much knowledge of modern genetics an atheist cries about, when he just revealed his lack of vigour.
Ummer Farooq Sorry but you are very wrong in your statement that a woman has to orgasm in order for a female to be born. At least you have your interpretation that goes on par with what the hadith is saying (according to my understanding). Brother Hijabs explanation seem very apologetic. If you dismiss the current “knowledge” of how a baby is conceived, I have no arguments to use. If you think a woman has to orgasm in order to give birth to a female baby, that’s on you.
The only yellow liquid is the follicular liquid which contains the Ovum. And judging by the hadith which that states that the man is only created from a tiny part of the fluid, we can conclude that the same applies here. In other words, just like "water of the man" refers to the sperm within the semen, "water of the woman" could refer to the egg within the follicular liquid. "whichever dominates" doesn't necessarily mean "dominant genes" but could refer to simply whichever gene is selected from a parent regardless of recessive/dominant. And it's a fact that if a man's genes dominate, the child will resemble the father more than the mother
UnNamed Beast The hadith mentions that the fluid is seen, Follocullar liquid is not seen nor is it “ejaculated”. Also the ovum is free from the follicular fluid when mature, meaning it does not mix with semen. Also as far as my understanding goes “mixed fluid” in the Quran (which would also apply to the hadiths) are talking about semen - which is a mixed fluid. So it is about follicular fluid is out of the question in this case. Your argument about “whichever dominates” is solid and find it a better argument than what Hijab talked about. However, it is not true if paternal genes “dominate” that the child will resemble the father more. We have several thousands genes with result in multiple phenotypes. The majority of genes could be inherited by the father but the child would still more resemble their mother if it happens that the phenotype of visual resemblance/physical appearance is more inclined to a maternal inheritance.
I've been following this for awhile and need some clarification. Hijab has always discourage interpretating the scripture in light of science, and prefers interpretation which reflects the understanding of people at the time of the revelation. However in this case Hijab seems to prefer scientific explanation (genetics) over the understanding of the people at that time (ejaculate). Anyone care to elaborate?
Mh isnt saying this has to be the right interpretation. And also interpreting with observations (like this fact or the fact that mt everest is tall) is different from interpreting with theories.
@@propheticguidance7842 The explanation of how genes enable parents to transmit traits to their offspring is known as GENE THEORY, not just by genes observation.
in the same field, It would be great to speak about the hadeeth of (الضلع الاعوج) and how this really looks like the chromosomes, the fact that Allah created Eve from Adam., is in fact a true miracle, because now we know that the male gender can produce men and women while female gender cannot do so. If Islam was a lie, why doesn’t any of the three monotheistic religion says that God created Adam and Eve at the same time ? Because Now we know the purpose of the creation of Eve AFTER Adam.
@Joker in the Islamic scriptures, the prophet Mohammad (pbuh) teaches us that Allah created Adam, and then he created Eve from Adam, literally he says he created her from "The most cantilevered rib" of Adam.
@Mark Gimme The ZUCC as you can see im talking about the admission Al lah saying in the Quran, that he will abrogate what the devil have inspired. im not talking of Hadith.
@Mark Gimme The ZUCC since you deny it , why the quran says that Omar said to muhammad do such thing this way such such such! and then Allah reveal the same thing exactly as Omar said. isn't that funny?
@Mark Gimme The ZUCC I though you dont want to talk about the satanic verses, because all you do is denying, denying is not a rational response but an emotional .
Why didn’t you give the reference for the story of the man with a black son? You could have been lying about it, and since you didn’t give a reference, then I have to assume so.
Salams can someone please explain to me this Hadith as I couldn’t quite grasp exactly what he was saying, also does it have to be in line with science?
So basically people understood the hadith incorrectly. They understood it as if the man ejaculates first, then the child will look like the father, and if the woman ejaculates first, then the child will look like the mother. But this is not how the hadith is supposed to be interpreted. The correct interpretation is if the substance of the discharge of the man dominates over the woman then the child will appear like the father and vice versa. Clearly this talks about dominant genes where the father's genes dominates over the mother's making the child to appear more like him. This is aligned both in the understanding of the Arabs at the Prophet's time and also aligned with the 21st century understanding of genetics. But it doesn't mean it has to be aligned with science, but it just is aligned with today's science. The Truth only comes from Allah subhana wa ta'ala. InshaAllah you understand.
@@hugoassamywirama3674 jazakallah akin just one more question,are we allowed to change the meaning or understand the language of Arabic differently? Or are these things being done to fit in with science?
@@alitaleb8731 Wa iyyakum akhi, do you mean when understanding the arabic of the Qur'an? Only the mufassirun (exegetes) are allowed to interpret the Qur'an, so we can't interpret the Qur'an and the arabic in it according to our own desire, we have to open the tafsir. And these things are not being done to fit in with science, but to fit in with what Allah, the Prophet, the Sahaba, and the Salafus shalih have said. Remember that science is not absolute truth. Allah and the religion of Islam is the absolute truth. And Allah knows best.
@@alitaleb8731 Exactly, we have to based the Qur'an and the Hadith according to the explanation given by the mufassirun and the 'ulama. Only those people are credibly knowledgeable on what the Prophet, the Sahaba and the Salafus shalih have stated.
Except that sahih muslim refutes you in his hadith. Sahih Muslim 315a. States the fluid of the man is white and the fluid of the female is yellow. If the male substance prevails the child will be male and if the female substance prevails the child will be female. So the hadith is about the sex of the child. So now tell me how a female fluid has any effect on the sex of the child. The determiner of the sex of the child is ONLY THE MAN, (The female's role is inconsequential) the female release only the X chromosome and depending on what the male gives (X,Y) that is what determines the sex of the child
The thing is There’s a Hadith in bukhari that talks about the same event. But instead gender of the baby it’s resemblance and also it doesn’t say the colors of the fluids. Since sahih bukhari is more reliable than Muslim with its Hadith, it’s more reliable to choose that over the Muslim Hadith
I know this hadith first when i see one clip of cpig. I laughed on that liar cpig and understand that this is about x and y chromosome not about ejaculation.
Isn't it funny that Mi Hijab is against the word "ejaculating" but completely agrees that: there are two fluids which come forth. From a man and from the woman. Look up the tafisrs your choice brothers and there is clearly stated: man's semen produced in the backbone meets woman's semen that is produced in her chest bones (neckless area - aka they breasts are their testies)... further it will inform U that man's "water" is thick and white and woman's "water" is thin and yellow... - well who cares then if "Is the hadith of which parent "ejaculates" first unscientific?" when the whole thing is unscientific from the beginning
Whichever of the fluids dominates and you interpret that to mean whichever genes dominate. That's some acrobatics. If you are going to use gymnastics like that then there is no point trying to refute Islam, you will be told it is conceivable that it means something possibly true. I know there are a lot of islamaphobes but a majority just don't get the level of evidence they would expect for Islam to be true, which is reasonable.
@@ciismanakh9707 I wasn't talking about the religion but about the (historical) reality. But there is also a hadith in with Muhammed calls black people 'raisinheads'.
@@schorpioen7466 this hadith is the opposite what those anti islam websites claim. The prophet sallaAllaho aleyhi wa sallam orders us to obey the ruler even if he was a slave. This was something unacceptable in the pre Islamic period. Islam gives right to the slaves even that they can become a ruler.
لكن هذا الحديث مصنف على أنه صحيح (جَاءَتْ أُمُّ سُلَيْمٍ إِلَى النَّبِيِّ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ فَسَأَلَتْهُ عَنِ الْمَرْأَةِ تَرَى فِي مَنَامِهَا مَا يَرَى الرَّجُلُ قَالَ " نَعَمْ إِذَا رَأَتِ الْمَاءَ فَلْتَغْتَسِلْ " . فَقُلْتُ فَضَحْتِ النِّسَاءَ وَهَلْ تَحْتَلِمُ الْمَرْأَةُ قَالَ النَّبِيُّ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ " تَرِبَتْ يَمِينُكِ فَبِمَ يُشْبِهُهَا وَلَدُهَا إِذًا " .) انا لا أفهم هل هذا السرد صحيح أم ضعيف
But mister hijab , I have an objection Narrated Zainab bint Abi Salama: Um Salama said, "Um Sulaim said, 'O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! Allah does not refrain from saying the truth! Is it obligatory for a woman to take a bath after she gets nocturnal discharge?' He said, 'Yes, if she notices the water (i.e. discharge).' Um Salama smiled and said, 'Does a woman get discharge?' Allah's Apostle said. 'Then why does a child resemble (its mother)?" (sahih bukhari 3328) in this hadith , its super clear that he is talking about nocturnal discharge. because from here its clear that according to prophet child resembles mother because of nocturnal discharge . and nocturnal discharge is not a "GENE" as you mentioned . if he was mentioning about GENE , then why bathing ?? 😂
Umm Salama is clearly asking where women gave wet dreams or not. The prophet answered in the affirmative, giving the reason that children can look like there mothers. He said that because the Arabs thought that the mother didn't have any active role in reproduction. The problem refuted that and said that what happens to the women happens to the man. It's not speaking about the nocturnal discharge, since it actually is clear and not yellow.
@@saifhaitham4088Muhammad says that when women have discharge from a wet dream they need to bathe. And Umm Salama asks if women have discharge, and he says yes they do AND because of this discharge the child resembles the mother. It’s really not that complicated
