Scientists Found Something Strange In The Solar System 

I'm 5 mins in I'll take Ur word for it thanks for saving me time

Same here ty

Nice , sick of vids like this 👌

And I’m out of here, thx

Not all heroes wear capes 🙏

Being able to do backflips isn't exactly useful for space exploration and gathering scientific data. Edit: But if we did put a backflippin robot on the Moon that would be pretty rad TBF.

That's just the technology they're showing us dude

I don't care

1 steps necessary 👌

It's like they said, they managed to encase the next explorer in a material that can protect it for around a month. We can get a lot done in a months time. Id like to see people protection though so that we're fine going into atmospheres like Venus though. But one step at a time though eh.

We will never be able to go into Venus’ atmosphere. Never. In a thousand years we won’t be able to survive Venus’ atmosphere. Never. Ever. Not in 10,000 years.

Oh! You're one of those!

@@TheeRyanBrice I can't get anything done in a month's time.

It had to be said 😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Well, the salt makes it freeze at a lower temperature. Also when that water freezes, the salt doesn't get frozen with it, only the water particles

Dopeness 😎😎

Rock and roll never dies, it fades into obscurity.

That's a very funny commnet

If humanity can get it's shit together . I believe we're the biggest hurdle not space itself .

O'Neil. Not P'Brien O'Neil is a professor, O'Brein is a star trek character

The major issue with habitats for a long term solution is longevity even the best made one will have a life span of 400 to 500 years. If society inside has an form of regression at all, then the entire habitat is doomed. You would need to strictly regiment education, workforce, etc... to always have skilled people. Politics would not have as much play because the constitution of each Hab would be nearly draconian to ensure survival. You would also need to make sure that you have a robust network of habitats to take on millions of refugees at any given time from any given calamity on any given habitat. In other words... they are a great idea, but fragile in so many ways even tough the habs themselves would be incredibly durable..

Unless you were unaware of the catastrophic cycles.

Since we’ll all be dead none of us will ever know. It’s like hoping your blood line makes it hundreds of years in conditions for life and the dream that the human condition doesn’t cause said bloodline to off themselves. Doing things for the future of mankind is a good faith effort based on what we know today, or is if? Live and let live = live and let die = the end. Or is it?

Bt xb41😊

Life always finds a way

If we had this understanding, we would have created life by now. It's impossible, the way they tought us in school. Don't take it from me. People like Einstein and Stephen Hawking are backing me up from heaven.

Of course. Theres so much we dont know.

@@CarolineLurks Non Christians in heaven?

@@bangrojai4868 Keep your religion to yourself, man.

I think the big question is, "was it previously sustainable?"

You disregard microbiology...

Shit potatoes?

You'll be long gone by then (likely).

uhh we can grow plants in space u realize hat right for like 30 yeRS THIS HAS BEEN THE CASE

Yeah if we think we could make Mars into Earth, then maybe we should just fix Earth

You would think but sadly the dumb are allowed to vote too. There should be a test....

Climate change is not caused by humans

All because a few greedy Crapitalist Overlords have to recreate functional kingship. We are functionally their slaves wh8le they rape our children on private islands like Epstein's. Crapitalism is EVIL.

Mars has alot of raw resources that people would be able to draw from to maintain a enclosed biosphere on Mars, the earth based one was trying to make it completely self contained which in theory should also work but as realised does not do so yet. i think the real issue would be more about space travel then planet based

Elon Musk is a showman and a scam artist. I wouldn't trust him to watch my dog, let alone set up a colony for Mars.

so many experts these days ;) :D

Such a nothing statement...

Just because we don't know everything does not mean we don't know anything.

@@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306 relative to the size of the universe and our current knowledge of it, yes, yes it does.

This was a whole lot of words to say absolutely nothing. Lol

Though, what?

@@iPsOfAcT0 Anything you're trying to say?

@@nachomuchacho1640Inferring is hard for some. Everything has to be perfectly spelled out for them to understand. ^

13:10 something is said 19:31 something you see 21:30 something happened 23:30 something said 31:30 the end

​@@uselesscommenters2707L😆L 👍 ❤

amateur or armature?

Water is a mixture (has H2O and other compounds) H2O is just the compound (of Hydrogen and oxygen-2). Water is always a liquid unless a suffix or prefix ice, solid etc. is added.

Lmao no

Would need a satellite of some vast magnitude... I'm talking whatever the theory is about how Earths moon got there... Like two planet sized bodies smashing into eachother or something, then maybe in a few billion years you'd have a reignited moltan core and tide creating and this life creating body in the sky of mars that would create some sort or habitat for some imagined form of life...

It has , check out the precautions NASA took regarding contamination on that asteroid sample they recentl harvested

If our history here on Earth is anything to go by in the vast reaches of outer space... when two groups of organisms that have evolved separately over millennia eventually come into contact with eachother it is more often than not devastating to at least one of those groups of organisms.

By giving them free food and cell phones

Well president bill Clinton was given a report that claimed NASA had found a meteorite that contained what appeared to be microscopic fossils, Bill ran with it and shared the report with the world, sadly Bill should have cooled his heels a bit and waited for further studies to be performed.

Welp I just did some quick maths for you and 18% of Jupiter is still actually about 234 times the size of earth... so indeed Not a small size by any Earthly comparison.

62 discovered in May this year.

True. The voice is the correct one.

That and planets are living beings. Assuming that Mars & other planets we're sustainable at one point. But, everything that lives must die eventually.

Some have said that humanity is a destructively predatory species, but predatory species (besides humans) on earth all have a balanced place in the food chain and are invaluable to the continued balance of their respective ecosystem, and the Sahara desert is in turn invaluable to the continued balance on the mass scale of the Amazon Rainforest, Central America, and North America. Same is true Northwestern North America to Japan, Siberia, and much of the rest of the Asian coastlines.

There is absolutely 0 evidence to support this.

@@quetzalcoatlz true, just fantasizing

You act like those things wouldn't of been possible on Mars you are also speculating this based on one instance. Just because the only life we know might of needed that it doesn't mean all life would need the same circumstances.

Yep. It is really not possible to set odds on things we only have one example of occurring other then 1/1.

Exactly, so many driving factors, the size of the planet, the size of a moon that distance away, water doesn't just magic from nowhere neither you know? That stuff is only forged in the few moments a star commits super nova... theres really so many many many things that need to be just right to make a home suitable to sustain life... we collectively aren't even sure with all our knowledge how it actually started... but we've been several billion years in the making, I'm certain of one thing, life will find a way.

Praise to the Omnissiah!

Google search rate earth theory, or improbable earth

9 atmospheres is a heck of a lot of pressure. 130 PSI

Will humanity ever achieve its destiny?? I share your concern at the ineptitudes of our species.

130 PSI...Yep, that will flatten steel. like being 300' below the surface of the ocean.

@@Frankthetank-zr5mc 262 feet, you discount 1 atmosphere as a pressure vessel would be equalised for the surface. The overall would be 9atmospheres but the differential is 8. It is PSI and seeing as the (I) is missing from the equation you do not have the information (nor does the script writer) to make a call of how much distortion, (if any) the pressure vessel (if it is one) would experience. Many many vessels (some designed for habitation with breathable air) and many instruments, tools and sensors (some liquid filled to protect and cool electronics) survive at those depths and well beyond. Also the shape has a huge part to play in the calculations of whether the vessel would be “flattened” which is also a misnomer. A common heavy goods vehicle tyre withstands an internal pressure of about 130psi without any adverse effects, it is not that much. A scenario of crushing force that the script writer might be trying to evoke is a bulk tank being crushed by 1 atmosphere when the gas inside the tanker is evacuated. But that is a vessel that is not designed to withstand any pressure differential. No design accommodations in structure, size, shape, metal thickness or metallurgy, and still it is not flat after. The most likely scenario is that the corrosive atmosphere made ingress to the delicate electronics. The script is lazy and inaccurate designed for sensationalism. Should they wish to state facts then they should state actual facts not guesses or sensational fiction pretending to be facts. I am not an engineer, I don’t even have a degree but I can use critical thinking and basic knowledge to see through their pseudoscience. It is lazy.