I have not seen this before now. My sister's office was where the nose of the plane went in. My solace is that she probably did not know what happened. Thanks for a terrific animation.
Ah man, I’m so sorry. At least it was a quick death may she rest in piece and her memory never forgotten as with the many who lost their lives or were injured during the attack.
It’s disturbing to think there were people in that plane, and people right there at their desks, that were either crushed or incinerated or both. The ones who died instantly were spared the horror, despair, injury and pain of those who survived, only to die in the collapse.
Based on a couple of witnesses that were near the buildings after the first plane hit, there were body parts littered around the grounds. They go into a little bit of detail about it in the Nat Geo docuseries on 9/11. It sounds to me like the wings sent a lot of people flying, many in pieces, down to the ground from the upper floors. I would've much rather have gone instantly on impact than be stuck above or around the impact site(s).
@@BryanClark-gk6ie - There was the one story of a young woman, just got to work, did a pregnancy test, it was positive. She was at her desk in the North Tower, telling her husband the good news over the phone. She must have seen the plane barreling toward her, screamed OMG, and the line went dead. Sickening. Her name was Patricia A. Massari age 25. She worked for Marsh & McLennan on the 98th floor of the North Tower.
There are videos of people who God only knows survived the impact zone, standing on the very edge of the torn and mangled building with fire all around them...some where till it collapsed, so sad for families who identified there loved one by the clothes worn & seen on the images
I did,I lost my brother Kohn M Rigo at the WTC in NYC. He was working for Marsh in the self insured group at the time. I think about my brother John every day and still I miss him. FYI - I pray for all the folks murdered on 09:11 and their families and friends .☮️✝️☮️✝️☮️✝️
Well if you want revenge. Know who the perpetrators are. For a critically thinking individual This should be enough evidence to prove beyond a doubt that SATANIC ( 33RD DEGREE ) MASONIC/ILLUMINATI. CONTROL OUR GOVERNMENTS AND THE WORLD. They are Corrupt, evil and very, very Symbolic. Our entire history was literally manufactured. You can fake alot of things but dates of large documented events proves very difficult. Like we should all be able to agree that the TWIN TOWERS fell on 9/11/2001 correct? So I don't expect anyone to just believe anything I say . MY HOPE IS THAT EVERYONE WOULD DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH AND TRY TO PROVE THE INFORMATION WRONG. This is just a small example OF 33RD degree symbolism. ⬇️ .................................... One big MASONIC symbol is the square and compass flanked by Pillars, representing the Roman numerals IXXI wich is 911. The US emergency #911 was adopted in 1968. 1968+33=2001 The WTC broke ground in 1968. And fell 33YRS later in 2001. The OWNER of the WTC complex was David Rockefeller. He was on the cover of Newsweek on 4/3/1967. 43🔄34+1967=2001. In the picture he was Overlooking NYC at the future sight of the TWIN TOWERS. The hands on his watch were at 9 and 11. The Pentagon broke ground on 9/11/1941 and was Nicknamed ground zero. Exactly 60yrs later both locations were hit. And the N.name was transferred to the site of the WTC. The first president to publicly mention the coming of the NEW WORLD ORDER was George Bush sr in a speech on 9/11/1990 exactly 11 before the TWIN TOWERS fell. The USS NEW YORK was built with Recycled steel from the WTC. The original USS NEW YORK was commissioned on 9/11/1911 and was Decommissioned in a supposed nuclear test. The ILLUMINATI was supposedly founded in 1776. The ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER that replaced the TWIN TOWERS is 1,776ft tall earning it the N.name freedom tower. THE observation deck is on the 68th floor. 6+3=9 8+3=11 1968 BBC short film called NEWS BENDERS. media lies creates news 5 years in advance to scare the masses to sway public opinion and move money faster. (Good watch) 30 min . WW1 Start Date: 07/28/1914 07+28+19+14= 68. WW2 Start Date: 09/01/1939 09+01+19+39= 68. RUSS/UKRAINE aka WW3 Start Date: 02/24/2022 02+24+20+22= 68. 6 + 3=9 8 + 3=11 The MAYAN CALENDAR ended on 12/21/2012 according to the gregorian calendar that we currently use. we didn't start using until the mid 1500s. If you use the ETHIOPIAN CALENDAR that is much OLDER and also mentioned in the bible multiple times. It changes the Mayan end date to 12/31/2019. The day NIH declared C-19 a pandemic. also NEW YEARS EVE 2020. hindsight is 20/20 is reference to year and clear vision. ETHIOPIAN NEW YEARS DAY is not 01/01...its 9/11. Revelation 9:11 Is about ABADDON/ APOLLION the angel of the Bottomless pit. Look up pics Depicting ABADDON /APOLLION. Look up( IS TRUMP APOLLION) You'll find a book titled TRUMP, ABADDON AND OBAMA. Suggesting that Trump is ABADDON sent to defeat satans Army. suggesting that Obama is SATAN. I know it sounds batshit crazy. BUT? There are photos of Obama dressed as SATAN and nobody else is in costume. The cover of the Economist magazine 12/22/2012 was a cartoon Depicting the 7 Deadly sins. Bankers are on a train labeled greed. Obama is in a rowboat labeled pride. Wich was satans sin. if you spell Obama's daughter's names backwards Take out the word ALAH it spells I AM SATAN. AILAM AHSATAN MALIA NATASHA There is a video clip of Netanyahu with Obama. Netanyahu refers to Obama as big Satan and Israel as little Satan. Luke 10:18 kjv I saw SATAN fall from heaven like lightning..... ( Lightning, Fall from high ) Hebrew translation Barac bama. A FESTIVAL in Italy called CARNIVAL de VIAREGIO. Has 150FT Trump float dressed as ABADDON. NO OPINIONS All facts. You can decide what it all means. But in my opinion if you believe it means nothing. Then you're brainwashed AF. If you have anything to add or you think I got something wrong please feel free to comment 🙏☮❤✝️🌐
Like the Original Architect said many times, it’s like a hole puncture into a screen, built with the capability withstand multiple 707 hits which were also wide body aircraft in their day‼️
funniest thing: aircraft was not even shaked while hitting the steel wall, not slowed down, nothing bent, cracked or broke away, just sliding in as if it is a computer animation is, same like this video.
I was a tourist that day visiting NYC - my third time there at the time. I really wanted to go to the top of the twin towers and we had tried to go the previous weekend but it was full. We were supposed to go on tuesday but my family decided last minute we would go to empire state instead and visit the WTC later in the day. While we were getting ready to head out that tuesday morning, we all found ourselves glued to the TV in our hotel watching the horrible images. What a scary time, I was just 13 and couldn't believe it was real.
Mad that everyone’s got some kind of spin on a story that they were meant to be there and something magically kept them from going. Also, if you were there, as in in New York, what were you watching on TV in your hotel for? Surely you could have just looked outside?
Didn't look at the date until I saw this comment lol, I was gonna say what's with the terrible physics with minecraft graphics? Now it makes sense. Would be nice if this was remade now.
On a building that was engineered to withstand a direct hit from aircraft, at that. And then not a trace found afterwards, other than random parts from aircraft not matching the purported aircraft in question. Then there's WTC 7, that just fell inside of itself...
There’s one guy I heard somewhere that watched the plane come directly at him and he was under the wing that was higher and survived. I think he still might be alive.
@@princesselani340 yes, if only they hadn't been political hostages of the u.s. gov't which at that time was controlled at a certain level by the neocons. But they didn't make it happen. The real power on this planet doesn't permit doofuses like them to have direct access to the real technology. The people who brought the buildings down were the same people who wanted to bring them down legally and were refused the right to do a controlled demolition. In order to not pay so much as it would have cost to disassemble the buildings, they blew them up with unknown technology. Let them give a signal to others in other countries that they have this technology, and let them remove all of our pseudo freedoms that we thought we had. Two stones with one bird.
The simulation of the crash is impressive. How sad what happened, not only because of the loss of life, but also because of the demolition of the towers. I was 5 years old when it happened, so I don't remember the attack, but I know we were all glued to watching the television. Greetings from Argentina.
You probably would be better off with something like a hang glider type of device rather than a parachute. At just fifteen stories, a parachute would probably not have enough time to deploy properly and do much to slow you down. Just a thought.
Helot Djut LOL...true. Yet, would you deny others a chance to be able to escape? I don't think you are that type of person. You seem to be a person that truly understands the value of all life.
Give them time, they have to wait several decades before they ever do anything else that involves the gubmint murdering AmeriKKKan citizens to start another war. This was worse than Pearl Harbor where they watched people die at the hands of a foreign nation to jump into a war, this time they actually murdered their own people to jump into a war that wasn't even connected to the people they said committed the act, LOLZ.
I’m a former New Yorker, I worked on Wall St. when they were being built. I was 53 when they collapsed, in court, sentencing a murderer to prison. I will never forget that day. Our family lost several people, three were relatives, the rest were friends. It still feels like it happened yesterday.
This is 16 years old and new to me. I'm 'glad' to see it. I have often wondered if there was any educated guess as to how things happened inside the building as the plane hit. Amazing what technology can do. I understand much better now how and why the buildings fell; I can see that it was a death blow to the buildings from the beginning. It seems that the people on the planes were killed immediately by the incredible impact, thankfully. Also that the people working on those immediate floors never knew what happened.
Ясно видно,что сердцевина здания,стальные опорные балки, мало пострадали. Здание не могло обрушиться из-за самолётов. Кроме того здание WTC 7 тоже обрушилось,но самолёты туда не попали
@@user-yg7zn6cy8oбесполезно объяснять. У них другой менталитет) они более подвержены массовой истерии и доверия к дядям с погонами. А мы наоборот никогда дядям не верим) Мне как инженеру по образованию очевидно, что самолёт из алюминия даже на скорости в 500+ км в час не способен сложить это здание пополам. Сердцевина максимум погнута но не порвана. И авиационный керосин не способен гореть с такой продолжительностью и температурой при дефиците кислорода, чтобы расплавить стальные колонны. Там инженеры тоже не дураки проектировали. Здание было рассчитано и под самолёт и под мощный пожар. Не было рассчитано оно только под систематический подрыв силовых элементов по площади) а и ещё, если бы верхушка даже и рухнула, то рухнула вбок, в сторону гле самолёт врезался, так как там больше топлива горит и больше погнуто колонн, и скорее всего частично разрушив под собой этажи, она бы рухнула под углом на город, но уж точно не прямо вниз как при инженерном сносе) Самое доверчивый народ это американцы. ))
I love how people are so possessed by the delusion that airplane wings are “flimsy” or “paper thin.” Airplane wings are extremely strong and can support several times the plane’s weight. I don’t know the rating of 767 wings, but some plane wings are rated at 12 times the plane’s weight. Have you seen a stress test? The wings can bend fully vertical and they don’t break. Also this notion that planes are built like soda cans? The aluminum they use is usually 6061 or 7075. Both of them are high quality and very very strong, and are also, you know, NOT the only metals they use… like, they have titanium and steel parts too, guys. Planes are friggin strong.
I'm more like Imagining that day. What it was like on that plane. Remembering Watching these planes hit the towers on tv and everyone scared and confusing. I went to work but no one did any work. We were glued to the tvs. America was under attack and wondered what planes have terrorist on them and what are they hitting next? The most disturbing part was when you could see people committing suicide before the building collapsed and thinking what would I have done?
it's counterintuitive but that's how it was, ie: foam can cut a hole through a thick high durability carbon fiber panel at the right speed, it took real tests to convince many NASA engineers that it was a thing. When you think of foam, you think anything but it being something so strong to go through one of the strongest materials. Momentum changes things drastically, in the end it's all about energy vs time distributing through materials.
funniest thing: aircraft was not even shakes while hitting the steel wall, not slowed down, nothing bent, cracked or broke away, just sliding in as if it a computer animation is, same like this video. and this means government of USA was involved and is guilty
@@mindblow7617 Good analogy. To understand what foam at high speed can do, one only needs to remember the Columbia disaster. A piece of foam broke off the center tank and struck the shuttle wing putting a hole through the toughest part of the shuttle and causing it to disintegrate on reentry.
@@buttafan4010 Who says, a RW nut job? Conclusion: There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles that you would expect to see from a thermite burn. They say the red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon-steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments. And there is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, so the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nano-thermite.
@@douglasross594 Can you find specific faults with Harrit's scientific paper? Who are the THEY you are referring to ... N.I.S.T.? NIST did not test for accelerants because they said there were no loud explosions. Thermate does not make loud explosions. And stop calling it thermite. It was not thermite. It was nano thermate; basically thermite + sulfur that has been weaponized. So there was no arson investigation as mandated by NYC fire regulations. I called several NYC fire investigators, and some from other major cities, and they all said that they do not "pull" buildings ... as Larry Silverstein stated on video. Are you a person who conflates religious and national myths such as those outlined for the 9/!! Commission members before their first meeting by Philip Zelikow. Why would side with the Mossad?
Imagine going to work that day only to find yourself locked in a decision to either be burned alive, suffocate until you died, OR still alive but barely able to breathe until the weight of the collapsing building crushed you, OR jump in which you felt like you were on the world's scariest rollercoaster going down for about 4 seconds before being hit with the most pain you've ever felt in your life for a brief one second, until you were dead. For 2,977 people, the end of the world came that day.
In conclusion: it appears that that particular 767 was made out of Japanese sword steel and that wall of the Trade Center was obviously made out of Play-Doh... NOT possible!
The "high quality" doesn't refer to high definition. Rather, it refers to the detail and accuracy to the physical effects of the crash. They could easily take that same rendering and reanimate it in higher resolution using newer technology.
That was really cool and graphic and at the same time so very sad to see what those people inside would have seen. I know they would not have known what happened. This video was extremely well done and thank you for taking us inside and see what happened. So many years later and it still breaks my heart. Amazing the technology we have.
This does not show at all what happened. Where are the explosions? Not the one from the plane, but the one around the building? Why is this a pro explanation video when REAL scientist say that both thos buildings could have withhold 13 planes each. This was all done from inside.
@@vyros.3234 Meanwhile there are thousands of independent engineers who disagree with the, what was it, a 12 person panel's opinion? Tower 7, which was over 50 stories tall could not have collapsed at those speeds or in that direction under that form of damage. There was minimum fire, the object didn't penetrate that far, and right before it collapsed, you can see flashes of light and the windows popping in a straight line near a structural location on a corner. Their official opinion was "tower 7 collapsed because of fires" -Shyam Sunders which is the guy youre probably referring to in one shape or form. Here is the thing. No jet fuel, and its the first time before or since a metal high rise has ever collapsed from fire. EVER. There have been buildings built half as well burn for over a month and were still standing. Tower 7 was the facility that housed the backup data for government debt. It was destroyed the day after the pentagon stated they couldn't account for 2 trillion dollars. Coincidentally the part of the pentagon that collapsed was the other location that data was stored. There were far too many coincidences during 9/11. Such as the plane that was crashed into a field is the only time weve ever in aviation history that there was nearly zero discernable pieces of the plane or bodies. It's not like we havent had similar if not exact same planes land nose first with more left over. And I never saw anyone like Alex Jones going to court for talking about it, because the government doesn't want to have to defend the evidence. I can tell you haven't invested any real time into it all. Cheers.
consider the fact a boeing 767 can travel between 500-600mph. this video helps show what happens to a skyscraper when something that size going that speed crashes into it. regardless of conspiracies of who was actually behind the attack, the planes flying into the buildings are what destroyed them
At the speed they pretend an airplane hit, the wings would first be torn from the body at sea level air density. And second when an object moves above 400 mph hits a solid object it atomizes and turns to dust. The image of the building so perfectly done was created with explosives. It even shows the shape of the engines. It's more like a cartoon than reality.
the very same day there was a simulation of exactly the sort of attack which actually happened. The only difference between the simulation and the attack was that the simulation invoked (fake) airplanes. The attack had no airplanes. Only the belief of airplanes. Because 99% of americans believe the TV more completely than they believe their own senses.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 and as for the people in New York who used their visual senses to watch the horrifying scene of a pair of planes hitting two of the most iconic buildings on the planet?
@@NaenaeGaming show me their statements. I don't believe it happened that way and that looking at their statements will show that to be the case. send me a link.
Dude the plane is going 200-400 mph when it hits a bird the birds at least going 2-7 mph it’s going super slow of course it’s gonna dent the plane it’s basically the same thing here do you think at all?
This is the first and last time in history that an aluminium plane (wings, tail section and fuselage) passed effortlessly through reinforced concrete and steel girders. Someone is gonna have to rewrite the laws of physics. ‘To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction’
Building 7 fell at free fall acceleration through the path of greatest resistance and was not hit by an aeroplane . Newton's 3rd law of motion apparently took the day off. Obvious controlled demolition.
The plane, that is virtually made of aluminum, hits the second tower and cuts through a steel and concrete building, in tact, like a knife through butter, no wing or tail damage, but the plane that hits the Pentagon virtually disappears, engines and all, wings collapse, engines disintegrate, no seats, luggage, just disappears. You can't have it both ways and besides, both scenarios defy the laws of physics !
If truthers are scum? What are liars? Fox News? World Trade Center building fell at the rate of gravity. Then NIST tried to deny it. When they were unable to deny it, they simply said that "they would go back to the drawing board on it" . Now, does that mean that they are compliant in the cover-up conspiracy? Let me put it this way. If we woke up in the morning and I was the supreme leader of the world., I would have every member of NIST and their ebntire extended families flown to GITMO. And one by one we would find out everything they know. If they denied the acceleration rate of gravity (and they did) then he'll yes they are in on it. Give me the power to subpoena and to grant immunity and some reward money and I'll bring you the heads of everybody who was in on 911. I'll bet my own head that I won't have a single Arab high jacked in the damn mix anywhere. Then I'd start with the media. And Fox News, including the janitorial staff. Isn't that excessive? Did you see those people jumping from the towers? Nothing is excessive. But, under my plan , not one innocent person would be harmed in any way. But I'd get every one of the guilty
i totally agree with yr synopsis , i think of it this way - lets just say it was the building that was moving @ 500 mph , and the building hits a stationary plain , obviously the building would demolish the far less superior airoplain !! do u live in america friend ??
One story was a young wife went to work, purchased a pregnancy test on the way, took the test….it was positive. She was by the window in her office in the tower, on the phone with her elated husband, telling him they were going to be parents……..in seconds she screamed…..he could hear the loud roar of a plane drown out the call and then nothing. Heartbreaking.
You should have got an engineer to do it. They would have known that the plane is made from thin soft aluminium and the the building out of stick steel and concrete. Like trying to stab someone with tin foil. These scientists were Tom and Jerry cartoonists really, like when Tom makes a cat shaped hole in a brick wall.
No they didn't. There are significant differences between the collapses of the two Twin Towers even though they were both of identical design and hit by the same type of plane. The collapses of Building 3, 4, 7 and St Nicholas Church were all completely different.
@pippa3150, Apparently you did, or at least all New Yorkers did, years later they actually selected a Muslim, and turned tail and ran leaving billions in weapons to the enemy. Do you even know who the enemy was? Why did we attack two countries that had nothing to do with 9-11, so yes you forgot everything. Maybe you didn't even know to begin with what the real truth is. You should stop watching the criminal media for starters.
not bad for being done with January 2002 computer huh? Crazy part is, the computer they used for this simulation was considered the most advanced computer in the united states at the time... I do believe this was partially done on NASAs computers. those computers compared to SC of today? not even a comparison anymore... like putting a regular Nintendo side by side with a PlayStation 5. I honestly wish they'd go back and re-do the simulation again, today, with the current tech. It would be far and above any simulation we've ever had depicting the attack.
One thing I find incredible about this simulation is that it utilizes ray tracing, which is something that ONLY in recent years has hardware been able to render in real time. Really neat!
@@mw00295 right but it hasn’t been rendered in real time on consumer hardware until just recently. Prior to 2018 it was not a selling point of gpus, just a rendering method that otherwise took several machines, and days to render out.
@@MealsMedia the video you just watched was most likely not rendered in real time, with each frame taking minutes or even hours to render. Ray tracing has been used in 3d animated movies since their inception. It's not a new technology, and modern games still cheat a lot with Ray tracing, as most of them aren't rendered using full ray tracing (e.g. Global lighting), and only smaller things like mirror reflections are actually Ray traced.
What an event... Every time I watch any video about the WTC attack I'm amazed that hundreds of people died in those planes when hit the buildings, people who knew they were about to die. RIP forever innocent victims of the greed for power, you'll never be forgotten.
The only thing I find funny about this (from a 2021 standpoint) is how he keeps reiterating that it's a state of the art animation system. My, we've come a long way. Edit: how are there 62 replies on this thing already
We? You mean scientists cause they ain't a damn thing 99% of people have done to better science. This is like taking credit for something you didn't do.
@@midsizesedan7620 scientists don't make these , they have 3D artists and programmers make sims But ig scientists provide the math for realistic physics
No... I'm sorry, but in no way do I buy this. Aluminium that has been completely obliterated and destroyed from the impact cannot slice and cut through solid steel like that.
It was dropped later to magnify the losses and exaggerate them. This is all a plan by the American government in order to convince the American people that they are in danger and spending on the army must be increased so that it can occupy and destroy countries.
It’s amazing you think the entire building could have collapsed like a controlled demolition from a few floors being destroyed the building was made to handle 5x the load it supported
Time for an update from Purdue! This time the amazing Boilermakers could include the long-term (2 hours) heat effects on the outer structural members of the WTC. You might want to try a finite element software that can perform structural thermal coupling like LS-DYNA. The folks at the Johnson Space Center have all of the material (heat damage) models for structural aluminum that could be used in this scenario. What a great Masters thesis that would be. BTW. America's most famous astronauts graduated from Purdue.
Not really, full of physics violations like all the airplane parts being indestructible after breaching the wall, and never slowing down even when hitting other objects, and even no gravity! So Purdue violates the conservation of energy, equal and opposite forces, and even that gravity exists, with parts floating UP at the end and traveling a straight line without arcing towards the Earth. The Bugs Bunny Road Runner show was more accurate. p.s. As a bonus, some parts just vanish when hit, violating that matter can't be destroyed.....
@@anthonywilliams7052 how are you dealing with being in a world where most people are either stupid or refuse to believe their own eyes and ears? I'm finding it stressful.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 It isn't fun sometimes but I've found that more and more people are paying more attention and more open-minded in general than 5 or 10 years ago. Also, many more people fighting back, exposing the craziness all over. That goes for 9/11 and the craziness going on in the world now. More and more people are finally speaking up. Don't let the media convince you otherwise. Better yet, don't watch any TV. I go to thrift stores sometimes and talk to other people, mention the crazy things in the media and almost always several other people will speak up. Be the first to say things and watch how fast people speak up and see there are many people that feel just like we do. We just need to organize, protest, expose the other side every way possible. Use their tactics against them like calling their financers and ask if they support things like the 173 segregated college or rheysyst things taught there now. Many new media or more popular media too like Epoch Times too. The far-left is only about 8% but they are taught to be very active and get a lot of financing and paid protesters too. We just need to organize and fight back as much as possible now so it doesn't turn into a Sivel Wore as they want. Support for the left is at record lows now, if not for hacked machines very few would be in office. Check out a channel Salty Cra---cker too (no dashes), see him here and better yet on Ody___see where many channels are moving since there isn't sen so ring. He's pretty funny and you can see where people are fighting back. Like one of my favorite movies said, "never give up, never surrender". p.s. Check the plane's seating charts and the number of passengers, what are the chances most of the planes would barely be about 25% full when they bumped people from planes to keep them at 100%? Search for "911 research seating charts" and see what I mean. I mostly stick to the numbers since they are easier to prove.
@@anthonywilliams7052 well anthony, I sure hope that there are lots more like you out there. I haven't owned a television for 13 years (since the divorce). I noticed one thing which seems important to keep in mind. There is a theory that suggests that there are inanimate, non-alive microscopic particles so small that you have to have a very expensive machine to even have a shadowy image of them. The theory goes on further to suggest that when nobody's looking these not alive particles penetrate the membranes of living cells and take over their reproductive systems and reprogram them temporarily to use them for their own purposes. Has this theory ever been substantiated? I've looked. I'd say somebody would have had to create an experiment which cleverly demonstrates that this is a true fact. The person or persons who'd have managed this would surely have accumulated a nobel prize or two and we'd all know their names. But I can't find any such experiment. So I have to conclude that there is no proof that any virus exists which has these capacities. Since there is no proof of that, I have to conclude that alternative theories are just as valuable. That perhaps particles that look like that are actually molecular debris from our own dying cells or the cells of any of thousands of species of colleague bacteria that my have died in our bodies. The envelope they talk about may be our own cells work. Perhaps our own cells do the equivalent of putting certain debris in a plastic bag of their own creation because it will be easier than breaking this debris down further. Why not? There's no proof of the other theory. So based on some unproven theory, the pharm companies write a bunch of papers which we're all supposed to believe are true. But in every case they are based on this unsustained theory, and therefore are not at all true. Can anybody find peer reviewed papers which show a repeatable experiment which clearly demonstrates the virus theory? I can't and I haven't and I've looked. If you have found such a thing please point me in the right directions so I can see it too. But I think the virus theory is like 911 and the apollo program. It's bullshit which is used to steal money from us all and in this case our health too. However the new technology that we still don't have access to is the technology which turned two giant buildings into microscopic dust particles in a few seconds while we watched. That is real. That could get us to and from the moon inside of the waldorf astoria. we could even bring the swimming pool. And all of the doofuses here refuse to believe in that and they've seen it with their own eyes. I was just looking at misinterpretations of the seismic data from that day. It didn't even mention that there were no s waves and p waves, only surface waves. The waves measured show that suddenly 350,000 tons of weight was removed from the surface. Figures don't lie but liars can figure. Not sure who said that before my mother did, probably somebody famous.
@@jsforce77 Yea 2007 youtube. RU-vid was only 2 year old..and this guys talked what happened 6 years ago.Now it's 20 years wow since that terrorist attack.
I think the people in the floors above the impact zones were basically cooked. A lot jumped, but not everyone needed to. I think some waited. It is horrifying. However that is the story in a high-rise block and uncontrollable fire (like Grenfell tower here in UK).
It is incredible that an aluminum plane broke the steel beams of the best in history capable of withstanding more than 300 degrees, the thermite explosive makes no noise
Can u imagine being in the building. Looking out and seeing a big ass plane coming right at u. Seeing it blow through the building, dozens of people dying. And then just being stuck up there, unable to leave, eventually falling down with the collapse of the tower
Cell phone call quality has only diminished over the years. Cell phones are not sold to be high quality phones, but small computers. Long before that stage, they were much better quality. Try seeing if you know anyone still using a flip phone and compare the service with a Galaxy.
Jeffrey C NO PLANE hit the Pentagon it was a cruse missile !! The hole that was only shown briefly and only once showed a hole too small for a plane to fit in !! And NO plane parts !!!
Senior Frog LIAR!!!! Firstly missile don't leave exit holes and knock over light poles, idiot. Secondly, there was plenty of IDENTIFIABLE wreckage that aerospace experts have identified. We even have the flight data recorder as well as over 130 people witnessing the plane strike. On top of that the personal possessions and physical remains of EVERY passenger and crew member known to be on board, as well as radar evidence. Are you really that desperate to believe the conspiracy, or just so gullible you blindly believe everything you read on conspiracy websites?
Just like the old rose said in Titanic movie..in the beginning scenes .... Thanks for your scientific explaination but the experience of it was much different
Can’t imagine how the real experience would’ve been. Being 1,000ft up, next to a burning inferno. When you’re in that position, the last thing you would think about is the scientific process of the impact.
@@onumahobart8832 no there weren't. But the worst of it is that nobody seems to realize that this was a planned attack by the people who have owned the u.s. gov't and every other gov't on earth with the objective of using fear to gain more control over us all. If we would all understand that, we could put an end to it. But the masses don't want to think about it. They don't want to get involved in their own destiny. We are in the process of being wiped out. The only ones likely to survive will be the ones most ready to accept their slavery. It's a sad commentary on the quality of the human soul.
Very informative, I can't even begin to imagine the horror those people went through on that fateful day, I live in Connecticut and remember driving home just after the second plane hit the tower, and while driving east bound I84, there was a plane embanking like it was turning around, I was thinking to myself is this the next one as I was listening to the radio and just announced a third plane went missing, ( the one that crashed into the Pentagon,) I never felt so scared in all my life. We shall never forget what happened on that day.
@@dianakibbe1885 you saw the detailed aftermath on tv didya? considering that no detailed aftermath was ever televised, i find that unlikely. are you aware as to what rolls-royce's response was when they were asked for engine model details when given whatever details were available about the engine in the wreckage aftermath? btw, i don't merely 'watch the news'.
I was 16 when this happened, during my 2nd Period Health Class Sophomore Year. I was in shock, had no idea what was going on, all assignments were cancelled and TVs were on showing what happened. Still didn’t know until I called my mom when I got home after school, my jaw hit the floor.
We still dont have an idea what was going on. The only thing we know is that the world has gone totally crazy after 9/11. The world is really upsidedown compared on how it was before 9/11.
not a good sign. you saw images on tv and didn't know what you saw until your mommy told you what you saw? And the TV told her what she saw. What's the point of having eyes and a brain?
You have to consider the energies at those speeds. As seen repeatedly in tornado and hurricane damage, even small, light-weight materials can do amazing things when given enough energy and velocity.
I wasn't in NYC, DC, or PA, I was just at work in a warehouse near Detroit. You don't really notice how used to certain noises you are until they're simply not there. Every day it's normal to hear airliners fly overhead constantly there, it's an approach to Detroit metro airport, but that day it was eerily silent and something felt very off about it, I just knew something was wrong. I didn't see what was going on until I got home from work since that warehouse didn't allow people in or out, and nobody really had radios or anything in there. Only thing in the sky was fighter jets, so high up you couldn't really hear them at all, just see the lights on them. It was so f*cked up seeing those people jump out of desperation live on tv, I'll never forget that day. It was also messed up when the east coast blackout hit soon after, that shit was crazy too.
I called in sick that tuesday morning. I just got home from the store, the first plane had already hit. I thought it must've been an accident. Then I 💩 my pants when I watched the second plane hit the other building. I knew then that it was no accident.
Like the analogy ... and think I get what you mean; however, I believe this to be an accurate simulation of what went on on that horrific day, albeit it is impossble to simulate the terrible experience of actually having been there ...
It might be extremely morbid but I've always had a big fasciation with seeing exactly what the impact looked like on those floors when the plane directly hit there. Not so much the smoke and carnage aftermath, just the sudden switch from normal to absolute chaos in a split second. And the likelihood that there is a big possibility that a person, or people, were hit directly by a burting apart airplane, when it first entered the building. Was there ever a feeling for them or was it so sudden that they didnt even have a chance to grasp? Also did anyone see the plane through the window right before the crash and try to run just from instinct? There are really a lot of morbid questions I have about 9/11 and I doubt I'm the only one. And unfortunately these questions will never be answered. And as morbid as this might be, I think this is a big difference than when people want to see jumpers hit the ground just for the pure fasciation of watching people die. Or atleast thats what I tell myself.
My hope is that it happened so quickly and those poor people did not suffer. I can't even begin to imagine how difficult it has been for the family members of those who died. It's so horrible there are no words. Rest in love and eternal Peace ❤
In accident situations our self quickly separated from our bodies. We're aware but in split seconds we jump out of our bodies and never feel a thing but those who maybe got trapped somewhere else in the incident unfortunately and didn't die in a moment notice they sat w pain eventually once shock wares away and reconnect w reality of something terrible happened but what.. dose this help?
When you realize this video was posted here much closer to the 9/11 attack than we're today here from this video being posted. R.I.P all the poor innocent souls 💔 Gone, not forgotten!
Awesome. l love how each part of the plane was done separately. The trijectory interested me for years and the fuel dispersion. Thanks for the upload!!!
In 2005, 4 years after the attack, the government's own National Institute of Standards and Technolegy issued it's report. It stated out of the 236 outer columns 33 were damaged leaving 86% undamaged. NIST estimated 6 to 8 out of 47 core columns were damaged leaving 85% intact and undamaged. That is what's known as Minimal Damage. They found no scientific reason why or how these two towers fell. They also found all materials used, welds,and bolts were above standards and no core column showed a temperature above 250 degrees. NIST never tested for residue from explosives or accelerates. In 2008 Shyam Sunder of the NIST said about building 7 " The phenomenon that was saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building was really thermal expansion that occurs at lower temperatures". Science demands a clear path for structural mass to accelerate at the rate of gravity, except on 9/11. Just what is this lower temp. thermal expansion that allows free fall speed ignoring load bearing continuous vertical support, floors of truss assemblies with carrier beams, lateral crosses, diagonal bracing, tens of thousands of welds and bolts, interior walls and partitions, office contents, 1 1/2" through 12"cast iron pipe, electric conduit, and all the other utilities to fall at the speed of gravity. If this new 'science' is now a known fact wouldn't we want to condemn all high rise buildings in places like L.A. and Phoenix? And to think there are people that believe this crap.
_"no core column showed a temperature above 250 degrees."_ Here's the full quote. You left out quite a bit there. *"For columns HH and C-80, few areas of paint were observed (three to five spots per column) with no indication of temperatures over 250°C. Note that these core columns represent less than 1 percent of the core columns on floors involved with fire and cannot be considered representative of any other core columns."*
Mark H You speak of truther dishonesty, and yet you state your opinions as fact. The head of NIST has stated that NIST did not test for explosives residue. Your thinking that they did, does not make it so.
IXL2BW _" NIST did not test for explosives residue."_ You didn't read or didn't understand my post. They inspected the steel for failure signs and clues.... They did this at the scrap yards.... this would have included the EXTREMELY OBVIOUS damage from any explosives destroying the steel.... in fact had there been any damage from explosives it would have been so obvious that it wouldn't have been seen at ground zero when they were pulling it out.
We are not talking about what should have been done, we are talking about what was done or not done. And in this case, like I said before, the top guy at NIST said that they did not test for explosives. Look up the video "explosive evidence" and see for yourself. Your claims are not fact, only opinion.
I also received this in my recommended. I’ve seen it before. Given the structural damage, it made me wonder, and all the videos of the people in the streets at the time, it doesn’t seem to occur to anyone watching that there will be a collapse. Not many are seem to be running away, though they should be. You would think there would be somebody in the crowd with enough knowledge of post and beam construction to recognize that the floors of these buildings would implode like dominoes. Somebody who would be screaming at people to run away? Strange. It’s as though curiosity overwhelmed them. Paralyzed. Awestruck. I wonder if there’s a video that shows The subsequent structural collapse in detail? Or how the spread of debris weekend surrounding buildings and caused their collapse?
@@juicenetmuzik765 The fire from burning jet fuel went on for sometime. Steel beams would expand and warp radically. Truss joists would fall off of the beams and corrugated pan and concrete flooring. along with it. The cumulative weight of each collapsing floor slapping down into the next would then pound layer by layer through everything below it. video footage shows exactly that. Laminated wooden beams deform far less than steel, and have a fire rating of greater duration than steel, notably.
It takes a lot of explosives to implode a building of steel, every 2 floors have to be cut. Simultaneously. Bars of 250 mm or 10 inches. Each floor section presenting hundred of columns, like a world of steel.
Omg so true! One aluminium plane can definitely cut through 47 steel columns. If you don't believe then take some baking foil and fold it in half to make it stronger then cut a steel spoon in half. It works!!! my spoon even caught fire from the vicious impact of the super strong baking foil. I hate my science teacher he lied to me because aluminium is way stronger than steel.
Ian Pemberton One is designed to take the impact of a couple airliners. and the other is designed for flight. Secondly the supposed commercial aircraft couldnt reach its highest speed which is mid 400's let alone surpass is capability so close to sea level. There is footage of a dump truck driving through smashing though an airplane and then continuing to be smashed when it tried to drive through some concrete.
Jesse Jennings _"and the other is designed for flight. "_ Sure it is... but what does that have to do with the impact force of a 100+ ton object travelling hundreds of mph? _" let alone surpass is capability so close to sea level. "_ This is total bullshit from people gullible enough to believe whatever the pilots for truth morons say. ..these are people who don't understand what VMO is. It's not a physical limit.
+Ian Pemberton so did the planes really cause those towers to crumble like that? The planes hit the top of the building and caused the foundations to crumble?? Really? Dang I need to re-think my whole life if that's the case!
I remember 9/11 like it was yesterday. I was in Florida at the time on holiday with my family from the UK. We had literally just arrived at a Disney waterpark and were told to evacuate. On the radio there was a report of a "small plane going into the WTC". We went back to our villa and switched the TV. I literally could not believe what I was seeing. When the second plane hit the South Tower, I was stunned. It was like watching a movie, but the fact it was reality I was watching was horrifying and hard to grasp. By the time the second tower collapsed, I was in tears. We went out to eat that night and the US people were incredible. Their grit in the face of such a tragedy, their camaraderie and grace with us and their determination to see justice. What also haunts me is that literally an exact year before, I went to New York and had dinner in the beautiful "Windows on the World" restaurant on the 107th floor of the North Tower. I remember my Mum asking me to stand in the window for a photo, but I was too nervous to do so as I don't like heights. To think that so many people were trapped up on those high floors of the towers at those same windows with no option but to remain or jump is horrendous. Just terrifying and awful beyond belief. 9/11 is imprinted on my brain and will never leave me. My heart goes out to everyone who lost their lives, their loved ones and all of the survivors of that terrible, terrible day.
I was only a 1 year old when it happened. But my mum had turned the TV on and was shocked an sickened by what she saw, it was 3 in the afternoon over in the UK at that time.
@@EuanWhitehead you are little older than my son Anders . He was in the womb that morning ( born late Oct 2001) He would flip inside line a dolphin, ( different wife ) none my other 4 children did that . Had birth trauma , he very healthy
And this shows what a lot of people sadly do not understand. Sure, jet fuel cannot melt steel beams, but the debris of the plane knocking out so many of them weakened that section so much that, between the weight of the upper floors and the heat, the rest of the beams buckled and the upper-floors collapsed, essentially pancaking the building all the way down. A simple game of Jenga will teach you this stuff.
@@TheStrangeKage That one is unexplainable. In my opinion, the fire marshal and the city probably deemed it too expensive to repair (cheaper to rebuild), so they imploded it and just lumped it in with the other buildings as a loss.
@IAmNeomic do.ypu understand what it takes to rig a building day of during a pandemic to be a perfect execution? (Video of my 911 experience, dropping tomorrow) I was right by building 7
Wow, who knew thin sheet aluminum could totally cut through and destroy structural steel and concrete. Airplanes must REALLY be strong. Notice the large hole in the perfect shape of an airplane on the side of the building, this is solid proof how strong they are. I’m sure any aircraft design engineer could corroborate this. It reminds us of the old Roadrunner cartoons when Wiley Coyote would run through solid rock and leave the perfect outline of his body, totally believable. Imagine repurposing airplane wings somehow for high rise building demolition.
Less about object strength and more about speed and weight. The plane was more or less disintegrated on impact. However get any heavy object moving fast enough and you can punch through anything.
You could punch a hole through 12 feet of concrete with a sock if it was moving fast enough. The energy of a moving object is equal to the MASS of that object (not material strength) multiplied by the SQUARE of the velocity. So while aluminum wings are much softer than steel beams, they could absolutely inflict enough damage to sever them at high speeds.
By your logic anything stronger than an aluminum can will deflect a plane hitting it at any given speed. Think before you post. Kudos to the responses above mine.
@@devinpol4258 top comment is what happens when people who don't understand physics try to wax poetic on physics. I'm an idiot and even I know there is more to the equation of airplane vs skyscraper than the material strength of the individual parts involved in the collision.
@@matthewhale1572 Absolute horseshit. When my 223 exits the barrel of my AR, it flies at more than 3,200 feet per second. It can easily penetrate, wood, concrete and thin sheets of steel BUT WILL NOT penetrate my 1/2 steel target. An airplane is a hollow aluminum can and cannot penetrate through 3” thick steel beams regardless of how fast it’s moving. How many buildings we’re supposedly hit by planes at TWC that morning? Two but three buildings collapsed at free fall speed with tons of debris being ejected sideways at certain instances which is an absolute scientific impossibility. Keep believing guys who lived in caves and couldn’t pilot a Cessna aircraft managed to successfully pilot a commercial airline and fly it in a manner even the most skilled pilot cannot pull off. I wish people would think critically instead of just believing what the TV tells them.
The demolitions were placed perfectly by demo experts. Did you know that the chief of security until 9-11-01 was Marvin Bush, George bush's little brother? YES george bushs brother ran the WTC SECURIITY and his contract ended 9-10-2001...
@@robertpatterson3321 As you can see, Bob, your question is still far from being answered four months later. Not surprinsingly, since it's been around for no less than twenty years... The truth is uncomfortable for so many!
I was there! I visited New York and got into the World Trade Center in 1999, in a hot evening. Almost nobody in the lobby, and I took the elevator to the top floor, to a place called The Greatest Bar on Earth (it´s probably the Windows on the World restaurant). I even remember I got a salmon fish sandwich and fries, and met an Asian lady who was actually German! If you´re reading this please let me know, it would fantastic to find you. Then everybody danced the twist... it was amazing. Cars in the streets were tiny dots down below... I CANNOT IMAGINE FALLING FROM THERE. It is beyond my imagination.
Ive been there too m8, i went there with my girlfriend in January 2000, up in the lift to the 'windows of the world' cafe/restaurant, the lift (elevator) was really fast i remembered...but yh, looking down from up there was pretty scary, i think they had them floor to ceiling windows aswell so it seemed worsre when u looked down.....ive still got a framed panoramic picture of the twin towers and N.Y. up in my living room at home in England.....i watched the t.v. for about 2 days solid when the attack happened.... Love to all the victims of 9/11......peace....🤘🤘❤❤
@@andybennett3736 How great! So cool that you have this picture... at the time there were no cellphone cameras and I didn´t bother enough to bring my SLR Nikon, unfortunately.
@@kevinkwiatkowski7197 Wow, hadn't heard that fantasy explanation before of seismic shock. If that was the case then most of Mahnattan would have collapsed. I hope you were kidding in your repsponse.
WTC 7 was hit and badly damaged by debree from the collapsing towers. This started an inferno inside, weakening the core columns which caved in and the building lost structural integrity. Resulting collapse was simply gravity pushing the floors straight down.
Looks like the channel owners deleted my other comment, maybe because someone reported it. This is why the terrorists attacked us because some people want to control what information is available .
@@waynelast1685 no lmao dude you’re being overly paranoid 🤣🤣🤣 RU-vid sometimes automatically remove comments if its AI algorithm detects something it deems as inappropriate
@@jamostudios7596 no there was nothing really that bad. RU-vid doesn’t remove comments but blocks comments with keywords. There was one woman making crazy comments but still I think we shouldn’t be in the practice of preventing anyone from speaking out even if we think it’s crazy or we don’t like it.
This is truly insulting. It's a cartoon. Anything can appear to happen in a cartoon. But generations raised on Walt Disney's drivel will believe anything they see on screen.
Let us never tolerate malicious lies served in the name of science to shift away from the guilty. 911 inside job planned mass murder and high treason. lets do simple math: (bush+binladen)*carlyle group +322=911 (cheney*norad) +322=911 (wolfowitz*PNAC/NWO) +322=911 (rumsfeld*alquaida)/aspartam +322=911 (kerry+clinton)*(blair+rothschildt) +322=911 (high treason*planned mass murder)+322=911 (inside job+insurance fraud)+322=911 and now the weatherforecast: advanced forms of biological warfare that can "target" specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool. (PNAC Paul Wolfowitz 2000)
terror 99% US/CIA 1% OTHERS Try math like 87(floors)/15(seconds) = *.17 of a second* Thats the time each floor had to dustify all the office furniture, office equipment, IT equipment, doors, etc. Even WooB here has not had a comeback to that statistic.
One thing that most analysts neglect to include in the total collapse of the towers is that at the top of each tower was a 30 foot thick solid slab of formed concrete used as a ballast to combat swaying in the wind. It had so much mass that moving it back and forth was nearly impossible. However, once put into downward motion from the collapse of just one weakened floor, the mass of concrete would have nothing to stop it. The second plane was larger and weakened a few floors at a slightly lower level and so that building collapsed much faster. So, the ingenious feature to help stabilize the building in intense winds also helped to hasten its total collapse.
I wasn't aware of the counterweight of that size in the towers, but it doesn't surprise me. I remember watching a summary of the building of the Burj Khalifa, and that has an approximately 400 ft long counterweight structure in the building to counteract oscillations due to wind/quakes.
Was the speed of the plane what allowed the wings to cut through steel? If so, then the simulation is believable if the plane was going that fast. If not, then the fact that the planes wings even made of aero space aluminum could hit steel and wings not break off, what? Some of these things make me ask questions about which I have no answer, but maybe someone does.
@mfitz1969 look up video "Evan Fairbanks WTC 9/11 footage". I see some of the plane come out and then a fireball. 6:40 min mark. I stated it went clean in.
@@MFitz12 there’s a core in the middle of the towers with the stairwell that stopped it. The rest of the building was mostly air. They were basically big tubes
